Saturday, March 14, 2015. Chaos and violence continue, the Tikrit attack proves to be humiliating for Baghdad and Tehran, lies and more lies from the US government on Iraq get exposed, we note the shooting death of an Iraqi in Dallas, Texas, and much more.
Qassim Abdul-Zahra (AP) reports that Badr militia leader Hadi al-Amiri has praised Iran for it's "unconditional" aid and support as contrasted with the US -- Iraqi leaders "kiss the hands of the Americans and get nothing in return."
Oh, Hadi, you're such an embarrassment, such an idiot.
Do you really think we've forgotten you or your weakling son?
Or the 2014 incident where your little baby (grown adult son) threw a tantrum because an airline refused to delay a flight for him.
Or that you, as Transportation Minister, then refused to allow the flight to land in Iraq?
Oh, Hadi, you stupid ass.
The world has not forgotten.
Nor has the world forgotten that, in your denials (lies) about the incident, you promised a full investigation.
There was never an investigation.
Which was good for your little boy, right?
Because you'd publicly insisted that if he was responsible, you'd turn him over to the authorities.
Poor little Hadi. Such a joke on the world stage.
And part of the reason the US government did not back, last summer, Ammar al-Hakim for the post of prime minister. Hadi's part of the al-Hakim led Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq. All Iraq News reports Ammar met with Brett McGurk of the US State Dept to tell McGurk that Iraq doesn't need the US.
Good enough, let's pull all US troops out of Iraq (at last).
Wednesday the Senate Foreign Relations Committee held an important hearing on Iraq and the Authorization for the Use of Military Force that US President Barack Obama has requested. We've covered the hearing in the Wednesday and Thursday
snapshots and will cover it later in this one. But for now, let's note what Ranking Member Robert Menendez stated as the hearing was coming to a close.
Ranking Member Robert Menendez: Finally, I do hope that we can get to a point to find the right balance and that's not easy in this proposition to give you an AUMF that gives you the wherewithall to degrade and defeat ISIL but by the same token doesn't provide an open-ended check. And I think that the real concern here is for some of us who lived under shock and awe and were told that Iraqi oil was going to pay for everything and saw a lot of lives and national treasure spent, that even well intentioned efforts can move in a totally different direction. And this is the most critical vote that any member of the Congress will take which is basically a vote on war and peace and life and death.
As if to underscore the points he was making Wednesday, CBS News reported Friday:
A U.S. soldier at an Iraqi training base was injured by gunfire
directed at the base, marking the first time an American soldier has
been wounded by fire from the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), CBS News national security correspondent David Martin reports.
A
Pentagon spokesman told Martin that the soldier received superficial
wounds to his face after the incident, which occurred Wednesday at 3:00
a.m. Iraqi time.
National Iraqi News Agency adds, "The Spokesman of the Pentagon said that this is the first time that a US
soldier wounded are carried out on the ground, since the United States
began training Iraqi forces as part of coalition efforts to defeat the
IS organization." All Iraq News quotes the Pentagon spokesperson, Steve Warren, stating that "US soldiers returned fire."
Oh, what a beautiful city
Oh, what a beautiful city
Oh, what a beautiful city
Twelve gates to the city
Hallelujah
There are three gates in the east
And three to the west
There's three to the north
And three to the south
There's twelve gates to the city
Hallelujah
-- "Twelve Gates To The City," traditional song recorded by Carly Simon on her Christmas Is Almost Here
Twelve Gates To The City, and 12 days to reach Tikrit.
That's how long it's taken the Baghdad-Tehran alliance. On Thursday, the 12th day of the operation, they finally reached Tikrit. Apparently, there was no direct path so they had to take stop overs, possibly they traveled Jet Blue via Miami.
Thursday, All Iraq News reported that Khalid al-Khazrji (Deputy Chair of the Local Security Committee) was insisting, "The Iraqi forces have completely controlled over Tikrit."
Oh, the lies and the liars.
Like Khaled al-Obeidi. Thursday, National Iraqi News Agency reported that Defense Minister al-Obeidi declared that the battle for Tikrit "will be today and will be a decisive battle."
Didn't happen.
But Iran and Baghdad's Shi'ite forces had finally made it to Tikrit.
And?
Jean Marc Mojon (AFP) didn't seem to grasp what he reported on Friday morning:
Iraqi forces on Friday battled jihadists making what looked increasingly
like a last stand in Tikrit but the Islamic State group responded by
vowing to expand its "caliphate".
Thousands of fighters surrounded a few hundred holdout IS militants,
pounding their positions from the air but treading carefully to avoid
the thousands of bombs littering the city centre.
The bulk of Islamic State fighters had left, only a "few hundred" remained and that was still too much for the combined might of Baghdad and Tehran.
Offering a more clear-eyed assessment on Friday was Saif Hameed (Reuters) who reported:
The offensive to retake Tikrit appeared to stall on Friday, two days
after Iraqi security forces and mainly Shi’ite militia pushed into
Saddam Hussein’s home city in their biggest offensive yet against the
militants.
A source in the Salah Al-Din Operations Command said Iraqi forces
would not move forward until reinforcements reached Tikrit, of which the
Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) still holds around half.
Using guerrilla warfare tactics, the militants have turned the city
into a labyrinth of home-made bombs and booby-trapped buildings, and are
using snipers to halt their progress.
Adam Rawnsley (War Is Boring) notes that, "in a sign of Tehran’s growing military presence in the Iraq, Iranian
weapons were a nearly ubiquitous sight in images and videos coming out
of the offensive to take the mostly Sunni city." Yamei Wang (Xinhua) adds that Friday saw at least seventy-two security forces injured and another 26 killed.
And today? Xinhua reports:
Iraqi security forces fighting to free the besiege
city of Tikrit planned to clear the city from the Islamic State (IS)
militants within 72 hours, a militia spokesman said on Saturday.
The city "will be liberated within 72 hours," Karim al-Nouri, a
leading figure of the Shiite party Badr Organization and the spokesman
of the government-backed militia of al-Hashed al-Shaabi, said in the
town of Awja, south of Tikrit.
But reality is not what's above. Reuters reports reality which is that the Islamic State still controls at least half of Tirkit and the security forces who entered the city?
They have "paused their
offensive for a second day on Saturday as they awaited reinforcements, a
military source said."
This is also echoed by the Oman Tribune, "Earlier, Iraqi forces and Shia militia battling to wrest full
control of the city of Tikrit from Baghdadi militiamen paused their
offensive for a second day on Saturday as they awaited reinforcements. A
source in the local military command centre said military commanders
had reached a decision to halt the operation until a suitable, carefully
set plan is in place to break into central Tikrit."
So the operation starts with claims that are never met (they were supposed to have entered and seized Tikrit two Fridays ago -- that is what the officials promised) and after they finally arrive in Tikrit and face significantly fewer Islamic State forces than they expected, they're still so inept that they have to pause their fighting and wait for reinforcements.
Hundreds of Islamic State fighters.
Thousands of security forces.
And the security forces have to wait for reinforcements before continuing the battle.
This was supposed to be a confidence builder.
It has been anything but.
Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi is again demonstrating he's no different than Nouri al-Maliki.
In 2008, you may remember, Nouri decided to attack Basra (and Sadr City in Baghdad).
It was an operation that the US was planning with Iraqi forces.
But Nouri jumped the gun.
And Iraqi forces, once fighting began, began deserting.
And Nouri hadto count on the US forces to rescue his plan.
But because the US government needed to promote Nouri as a leader, it was considered unkind to point out that it was only US forces that diverted the disaster.
And now there's Haider.
Who didn't want US help on this.
And the forces -- with all of Tehran's help -- couldn't even make it into Tirkit on time.
And when they did?
They can't even fight a much smaller than expected group of Islamic State fighters.
This was supposed to be the morale booster.
It should be the wake up call.
Yes, the US military assessment was correct: Iraqi forces (with or without help from Tehran) are still not ready or maybe just still not committed to the actual fight.
Sending Shi'ites into Saddam Hussein's home town?
It was supposed to be a morale builder because Shi'ites hated (and continue to hate) the late Iraqi President Saddam Hussein.
This was the area they would shoot up and destroy, feeding on their own hatred.
But even with all that, they still can't pull it off.
They're an embarrassment.
So is stupidity.
We're not even going to go into Nancy A. Youssef's idiotic efforts to claim a slice of Tikrit for the US -- she (and brass) feared the operation would be a success -- because they're unable to use their eyes and ears -- so she did a piece of whoring -- like what she used to do for McClatchy all the time. We're not linking to her nonsense.
But we will go to greater stupidity.
Foreign Policy, we mean you.
Why did you ever hire idiots like David Frances and Sabine Muscat who wrote on Friday:
Congress sits by as Christians are besieged by the Islamic State. Last
August, President Barack Obama signed a bill creating a special envoy
charged with helping Iraq’s Christian communities and other minority
religious groups targeted by the Islamic State. Seven months later, the
post is still vacant, and Congress seems in no rush to fill it. FP’s Bethany Allen-Ebrahimian and Yochi Dreazen report on a “small but concrete example of Washington’s passivity
in the face of an ongoing wave of atrocities against the Assyrian,
Chaldean, and other Christian communities of Iraq and Syria.”
Leave out Yochi and Bethany because they don't argue what Frances and Muscat stupidly do.
Have you finished the third grade?
If so and you're an American citizen going to school in America you should be rolling your eyes at what Frances and Muscat wrote.
Congress isn't sitting by.
They're not the ones "in no rush to fill it."
Because, even though Frances and Muscat are too stupid to know it, Congress merely votes to confirm (or deny) someone the president nominates.
What kind of whores are Frances and Muscat to blame Congress for Barack's inaction?
Stupid whores if they think they can get away with it.
Again, the linked to article by Yochi and Bethany does not make the claim Frances and Muscat do.
Frances and Muscat are wrong, they're wrong about the Constitution and they really shouldn't be allowed to cover these topics anymore because either they're too stupid or they're too biased to be trusted.
Here's reality, Barack waited 10 days to sign the bill in question (passed by Congress) and did so quietly, as Yochi and Bethany note, "the White House quietly announced the signing in a late-afternoon press
release that lumped it in with an array of other low-profile
legislation. Neither Obama nor any prominent lawmakers made any explicit
public reference to the bill."
When Barack's failure to nominate someone for the post results in two 'reporters' rushing to slam Congress, then Foreign Policy needs to do a house cleaning. Frances and Muscat are not qualified to even write up synopsis so they shouldn't be working for Foreign Policy.
Yochi and Bethany write an even-handed report which includes:
Administration officials say they are paying close attention to the
plight of Iraq’s religious minorities and doing all they can to help. In
an interview, Rabbi David Saperstein, the State Department’s
ambassador-at-large for international religious freedom, said that he
has devoted the majority of his time since assuming his post last
December to the plight of the Christians and other groups that find
themselves in the crosshairs of the Islamic State.
Saperstein noted that when the Islamic State encircled thousands of
members of the country’s Yazidi community and threatened to exterminate
them last year, it was American warplanes that beat back the militants
and allowed the civilians to escape their clutches. “There are scores of
thousands of people who are alive because of what we did,” he said.
The issue is Iraqi Christians.
If Saperstein is too ignorant to know that Yazidis are not Christians may be he's not up for his job.
The Yazidis should have been (and were) provided with supplies dropped from planes.
In addition, they were used to put US forces (publicly) back into Iraq.
The Yazidis are now aligned with the neocons -- via their sole MP in Parliament who spends so much of her time in England, Canada and the United States. They really don't need an advocate.
But Iraqi Christians have been very public about the fact that the Yazidis have gotten the world's attention while the slaughter of Iraqi Christians in Iraq goes largely unnoticed.
The so called objective press might want to explain to their news consumers why that is, why they ignore the Iraqi Christians while they provide tons of coverage to the group advocating for US combat troops in Iraq -- because that's what the Yazidi leadership signed off on when they agreed to take neocon money in an effort to publicize themselves.
On the battles in Iraq, Kareem Shaheen (Guardian) reports:
On Friday a prominent Iraqi Sunni preacher urged authorities to
prevent Shia militias from carrying out revenge attacks. Sheikh Abdel
Sattar Abdul Jabbar said that if the government failed to stop revenge
attacks by Shia militias, the country would face reignited sectarian
tensions such as the ones it witnessed at the height of the war in 2006
and 2007.
“We ask that actions follow words to punish those who are attacking
houses in Tikrit,” Abdul Jabbar said during his Friday sermon in
Baghdad. “We are sorry about those acting in revenge that might ignite
tribal anger and add to our sectarian problems.
Analysts say the campaign to liberate Sunni areas must be led by
members of the community, fearing retributions and revenge attacks that
could upend the campaign to drive out Isis.
Back to Wednesday's hearing. Isakson questioned the need for a time limit on Barack's proposed AUMF -- which currently has a 3-year-provision calling for a review three years after it is passed. Isakson wondered, "Wouldn't we be better off sending a clear signal that there is no end to this conflict as far as we are concerned until we win the victory?" Click here for the press release from Senator Isakson's office.
For any wondering about the answer, Ash Carter repeatedly stated this was a "political consideration" and that the Good and Powerful Barack didn't want to tie anyone's hands.
Strange because Bully Boy Bush signed a three year agreement with Iraq after -- after -- the 2008 elections which saw Barack win the presidency. Before Barack won the presidency, he (and Joe Biden) insisted they would oppose Bully Boy Bush doing any such agreement without the Senate signing off. Immediately after the election -- Deletion You Can Believe In -- that promise disappeared from the campaign site and neither Barack nor Joe ever brought it up again.
Ash Carter is the Secretary of Defense. He appeared at the hearing to offer testimony as did Secretary of State John Kerry and General Martin Dempsey who is the Chair of the Joint Chiefs.
Let's jump in on this exchange.
Senator Cory Gardner: . . . what weight of effort would you say that the Peshmerga or other fighting in the region are pursuing against ISIL?
Gen Martin Dempsey: The early successes against ISIL were largely through the Peshmerga. And that will evolve over time but they've been carrying the majority of the effort thus far.
Senator Cory Gardner: And by majority of effort, is there a weight? Like they're carrying out a third? Three-quarters? Ninety percent?
Gen Martin Dempsey: No, Senator, I can't actually put
Senator Cory Gardner: -- the weight of effort on it?
Gen Martin Depmsey: -- but the early, uh, the early effort to blunt ISIL's momentum were north and therefore with the Peshmerga
Senator Cory Gardner: And reports in the news and other places have stated the Peshmerga are only getting about 10% of the arms that have routed through -- that have been routed through Baghdad. Is that correct?
Gen Martin Dempsey: Uh, again, I don't have the percentage but I can certainly take it for the record. But there were some friction early on with the willingness of the government of Iraq to provide weapons to the Peshmerga but we think we've-we've managed our way through that.
Senator Cory Gardner: And so right now you feel confident that the process by which arms will reach Erbil have now been settled or resolved?
Gen Martin Dempsey: I am confident that we've broke through the initial friction but it doesn't mean it won't return.
He was confident on Wednesday.
Is he still confident?
Or is he just a liar?
Massoud Barazani is the President of the Kurdistan Regional Government.
Hours after the hearing, The NewsHour (PBS -- link is text, audio and video) aired an interview with Barzani which included Barzani declaring:
We are satisfied with the [US] air support. We are getting good support,
but, in reality, to this present moment, we have the same view as in the
past on arming and equipping the Peshmerga forces with the right
weapons. It’s not to the standard we want.
If that's confusing for anyone -- possibly confusing for Dempsey, the title of the segment is "Kurdish leader says more U.S. weapons needed in fight against Islamic State."
Peshmerga forces include women and Cale Salih has written about that for CNN here.
But to the point of Dempsey's dishonesty?
That's all the hearing offered: dishonesty from the witnesses.
Hour after the hearing, James Gordon Meek, Brian Ross, Rym Momtaz and Alex Hosenball (ABC News) broke the news that Shi'ites were committing War Crimes (they called it "human rights violations") in Iraq.
At the hearing, John Kerry lied non-stop including, "So as long as we continue to work on the integration, the
internal inclusivity of Iraq and its government -- to help the Iraqis
to be able to do this themselves, help the region feel empowered by it,
that is a long term recipe for the United States not to have as much
risk and not to have to put ourselves on the line the way we have
historically."
There is no 'inclusivity' in Iraq. Shi'ites forces are targeting, terrorizing and killing Sunni civilians.
A fact Kerry didn't raise before the Committee.
Let's again note, the Thursday broadcast of ABC World News with David Muir:
David Muir: Now to new fall out after our ABC investigation last
night. It involves the fight against ISIS known for those awful videos,
lining up their victims on the beach. And now a new concern. Are some
of the Iraqi forces -- trained and paid for by US taxpayers -- using
techniques that are just as brutal? Well the State Dept tonight
responding to our report and ABC's chief investigative reporter Brian
Ross back on the job tonight.
Brian Ross: The State Dept called these scenes today serious and
disturbing. Brutal images of what appear to be Iraqi forces and militias
carrying out, celebrating, torture and beheadings. In this torture
scene, two US weapons against the wall. This video shows two civilians,
pleading for their lives, about to be shot dead. A man with an American
supplied weapon walks by, a gunman with what appears to be the insignia
of Iraqi Special Forces caught on tape.
US State Dept spokesperson Jen Psaki: Their behavior must be above
reproach or they risk being painted with the same brush as ISIL
fighters.
Brian Ross: The Pentagon says it has already cut off money to some
Iraqi units because of gross human rights violations. But Senator
Patrick Leahy says the ABC News report shows the government should cut
off money to more Iraqi units.
Senator Patrick Leahy: When you look at at the videos and look at the
uniforms being worn, do we really want to say the US condones that?
Brian Ross: US officials tonight tell ABC News that America's top
military leader Gen Martin Dempsey, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs,
has repeatedly warned Iraqi leaders about the conduct of the Iraqi
military and the militias that fight with them -- especially because the
US is sending $1.5 billion to the Iraqi army and almost 3,000 American
troops to help train them.
The hearing on Iraq? John Kerry should have informed the Committee.
Especially since this was Senator Bob Menendez's concern.
Not his concern today.
His concern back in November of 2013.
He was very concerned -- and very public about it -- that the US government would be arming thugs who would use the weapons to terrorize the people.
The White House not only assured him that would not happen, they promised that if it did, they would -- as the law requires -- cut off all arm shipments to Iraq.
Starting to understand why John Kerry lied and failed to disclose the abuses to Congress?
It was one lie after another.
And Kerry was also caught this week in yet another lie.
Last month, he was grandstanding in Munich -- yet again acting as though
he were the Secretary of Defense -- and he created a figure -- how very
Brian Williams of him -- that really didn't exist as he claimed that
50% of the Islamic State's leadership had been decimated in Syria and in
Iraq.
Eli Lake and Josh Rogin (Daily Beast) reported Friday:
When asked about Kerry's 50 percent claim, Army Captain John J.
Moore, a spokesman for U.S. Central Command, told us: "We currently
don't have a percentage attached to that statistic."
Experts told us Kerry’s estimate is tough to understand, because
defining the Islamic State’s “leadership” is subjective. Cole Bunzel, a
Princeton University scholar of Near Eastern Studies who closely follows
Islamic State, said its leadership structure is opaque, and not much is
known about the true membership of its Shura and Sharia councils, which
play an important role in the organization. When the Islamic State has
announced major decisions, such as its decision to expand into Syria or
declare itself a caliphate, said Bunzel, it has made clear that one or
both of those councils were consulted by Baghdadi.
"I am very skeptical of the claim that the coalition has killed 50
percent of the leadership of the Islamic State, whatever that means,”
said Bunzel.
He later added, "The Islamic State has publicly announced when senior
members of the group have been killed. But they have never talked about
anyone in the core leadership being killed since 2010."
It's just been one lie after another.
And that's why Congress should be very alarmed at the wording in Barack's requested AUMF.
In the hearing, Senator Chris Murphy noted:
I remain as frustrated as many of my colleagues with this question over these definitions
I think the problem is in part every different member of the administration we talk to does seem to have a slightly different interpretation of what these words mean and I can't blame them because, I think, as Secretary Carter said there's no historical operational definition of these words. But I think the lack of consistency has hampered our efforts to get on the same page together.
Senator Rand Paul noted in the hearing, "It's disdainful to say, 'We want you to pass something but it really doesn't matter, we'll just use 2001' -- which is really absurd. It just means that Congress is inconsequential and so are the people and the country,"
And it was disdainful for the witnesses to lie to Congress.
And Kerry's entire presentation was disdainful and, yes, shameful.
He needs to learn to shut his mouth.
Yeah, he chaired the Committee -- back when people traveled in wagons. He's Secretary of State now and he needs to learn to shut his mouth.
At one point, the Chair told him he was done.
Kerry insisted he wasn't.
Chair Bob Corker said he was done with his "speech" and that he had taken five minutes and 20 seconds to 'answer' a question. The time was up. The Senator asking questions had already pushed the time limit before finally giving Kerry a chance to speechify. It was time for the next Senator to ask questions.
When the Chair tells you that, you don't keep talking, you don't argue.
You just shut your damn mouth.
When he chaired the Committee, Kerry certainly understood that.
His preening ego, however, prevents from understanding it today.
Moving from Kerry's never ending jaw boning and lying to violence in the US, All Iraq News notes the fatal shooting of Iraqi Ahmed al-Jumaili in Dallas, Texas. Al-Jumaili was an Iraqi refugee who had only recently arrived in the US. CBS News reports:
The victim's wife, Zahraa Altaie, told the station they noticed the
men that night but paid no attention to them nor did anything to provoke
them. She said the shooting appeared to be random.
"I put my hand on his heart. I still feel his heart beating. I tried to stop his bleeding, but I couldn't," said Zahraa.
Iraqi community members are e-mailing asking where the left is on this?
They note that the American left was calling out the movie American Sniper. (Some were calling it out. I didn't call it out.) They note the protests in Ferguson over the killing of an African-American (Michael Brown) by police.
So why isn't this faction of the left also objecting to the murder of Ahmed, the e-mails ask?
That's a question they'll have to answer. I don't think it will be a pretty answer so I'm guessing those that called out a film -- Debra Useless Sweet, Cindy Sheehan and all the others -- will not call out the killer who, for the record, is African-American. Nykerion Nealon is the killer's name.
Rachelle Blinder (New York Daily News) reports:
Nealon, who went by the nickname Kaca, did not know al-Jumaili and shot
him while seeking revenge, Cotner said. Someone reportedly shot at his
girlfriend's apartment in a neighboring complex, making Nealon round up
three buddies to look for the suspect, a witness told police. They went
to Nealon's apartment to get his assault rifle and then headed to
Al-Jumaili's apartment complex.
The thug saw al-Jumaili taking pictures of the snow and raised his
rifle, one of his friends told police. The friend took cover under
bushes and heard shots ring out, he said.
Al-Jumaili ran back to his apartment as Nealon followed him with his
eyes, continually aiming his rifle and firing at him, Cotner said.
Al-Jumaili was shot in the chest.
15 shell casings were found at the crime scene.
Let's also note that the claim of Kaca's girlfriend's apartment being shot at was made -- in a phone call to the police -- after Kaca shot dead Ahmed. After. Whether the claim is true or not, no one knows.
Whether it's true or not, it does not justify Kaca grabbing a gun and killing anyone.
But it's important to remember the claim came after the fact.
It's important to remember Kaca shot dead Ahmed. Kaca and friends then ran to girlfriend's apartment. Then the police were called and the alleged shooting at girlfriend's apartment was reported to the police but they didn't report the murder of Ahmed. They didn't report that Kaca had shot Ahmed.
As Telemundo reports, the police only discovered Kaca shot Ahmed because Kaca was caught on security cameras (with his rifle).
I wouldn't believe, were I on the jury, the claim of a shooting at an apartment without physical evidence. That said, were I the defense attorney, I would be sure to put Walnut Bend Apartments on trial and note that the ownership (BH Management) is notorious for its shoddy practices -- including falsely telling renters that eviction processes had been started, including failure to salt frozen stairs and walk ways, etc. They have one of the worst images of any in the region. They do not have security, they often arrange drive throughs with local police. Were I the defense attorney, I'd be asking what the security was like and how responsive the management was to security concerns.
Regardless of whether or not the shooting at his girlfriend's apartment can be proven, if BH Management did their usual poor job of security and of responding to safety concerns, a case for Kaca could be built around that. And it's winter -- almost over -- so BH Management probably distributed in January or February a flier to the residents of Walnut Bend Apartments that would basically make clear how little responsibility BH Management takes for their properties. I'd get a copy of that, were I the defense attorney, to explain why Kaca might have felt it was necessary to defend his girlfriend himself.
If he is convicted? A few e-mails from Iraqi community members ask about the death penalty? Texas is a death penalty state. If tried as an adult (Kaca is 17), the killer could face the death penalty.
(We are not calling the victim, Ahmed, by his last name because we humanize people by calling them by their first names here. Due to the accused's age, we're also going with something other than the last name. And we would have gone with his first name but when people have a preferred name that is on the record -- such as Ed Snowden always introducing himself as "Ed" -- we call them by the name they prefer.)
iraq
cbs news
david martin
pbs
the newshour
eli lake
bloomberg news
abc news
james gordon meek
Brian Ross
rym momtaz
alex hosenball
david muir
abc world news
Saturday, March 14, 2015
Friday, March 13, 2015
House, Senate Leaders Call for Answers on Construction Delays, Cost Overruns at Colorado VA Hospital
The leadership of the House and Senate VA Committees have joined together to call for answers. The Senate Veterans Affairs Committee Chair is Johnny Isakson and the Ranking Member is Richard Blumenthal while the House Veterans Affairs Committee Chair is Jeff Miller and the Ranking Member is Corrine Brown.
veterans
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
|
|
Wednesday, March 11, 2015
|
Curt Cashour (Miller), 202-225-3527
Josh Zembik (Blumenthal), 202-224-6452
David Simon (Brown), 202-225-0123
|
House, Senate Leaders Call for Answers on Construction Delays, Cost Overruns at Colorado VA Hospital
WASHINGTON
– Leaders of the House and Senate Committees on Veterans’ Affairs this
week called on the Department of Veterans
Affairs to address the ongoing problems that have plagued the
replacement Denver VA Medical Center hospital, including mismanagement
that has led to hundreds of millions in cost overruns and repeated
delays.
In a
letter to VA Secretary Robert McDonald, Sens. Johnny Isakson, R-Ga. and
Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., chairman and ranking member of the Senate
Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, respectively, along
with Reps. Jeff Miller, R-Fla., and Corrine Brown, D-Fla., chairman and
ranking member of the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs,
respectively, requested a detailed analysis of the project’s
construction costs and updates on efforts to hold those responsible
for the cost overruns and delays accountable.
“It
is crucial that we get answers from Secretary McDonald about his plans
to address these issues surrounding the construction cost overruns and
serious schedule delays at the Denver VA Medical
Center,” said Isakson, chairman of the
Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs.
“First and foremost, we must ensure the veterans of Colorado are
provided for, and completion of the project is critical in providing
necessary care and support. We must also get to the bottom of what went
wrong
here and hold accountable the VA and those responsible for the gross
mismanagement of this construction project. As one of my top priorities
to bring oversight directly to the VA, I intend to make Denver one of
the next in a series of VA site visits and field
hearings conducted by the Senate VA committee.”
“Months after the biggest
construction failure in VA history, and weeks before work is yet again
set to stop on the replacement Denver VA medical center, the department
hasn’t provided Congress
the information required to get the effort back on track,” said Rep. Jeff Miller, Chairman, House Committee on Veterans Affairs.
“Since the project’s inception, the cost of the hospital
has ballooned from $328 million to $800 million, and now it looks as if
the price tag could top $1 billion. Absent a VA plan to hold the
employees responsible for this massive failure accountable and ensure
the project is completed in a timely fashion, authorizing
any more money for this project would simply be irresponsible. We are
committed to ensuring all veterans receive the best health care
possible. But in order for that to happen, VA must put forth a plan to
solve its construction challenges once and for all.
That hasn’t happened yet.”
"Veterans in Denver and the
surrounding area deserve the best medical care available in the
state-of-the-art facility they were promised years and years ago—delays
and mismanagement of the construction
for the replacement VA Medical Center are simply unacceptable,” said Blumenthal, ranking member of the Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs.
“Secretary McDonald must be more transparent
regarding the ongoing issues that led to these delays and cost
overruns, and any actions the VA is taking to prevent them on future
projects. Further, the American public, particularly our nation’s
veterans, deserve to know who is responsible and what will
be done to remedy these serious issues. As Ranking Member of the Senate
Veterans Affairs Committee, I will continue to call on the Secretary to
make good on his promise of transparency and accountability at the VA."
“As the Ranking Member on the House
Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, I urge the VA to immediately address the
serious issues concerning funding at the Denver VA Medical Center,”
said Rep. Corrine Brown, Ranking Member, House Committee on Veterans Affairs.
“We must ensure that America’s veterans, who have made tremendous
sacrifices for our great nation, receive the best care available from
our VA medical facilities. I am confident
that under the leadership of Secretary McDonald, the Department of
Veterans Affairs is capable of bringing a quick resolution to the
management problems at this facility. Along with my colleagues on the
committee, I will be vigilant in ensuring that the VA
carries out this important task.”
The group has requested a response from Secretary McDonald no later than Monday, March 16, 2015.
Full text of the letter is provided below, and the letter can also be viewed online
here.
March 10, 2015
The Honorable Robert A. McDonald
Secretary
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
810 Vermont Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20240
Dear Secretary McDonald:
The
VA notified Congress in responses to House Veterans’ Affairs Committee
pre-hearing questions for the February 11, 2015 budget hearing, that it
would need an interim increase in the funding authorization
cap and a reprogramming of about $200 to $240 million from other VA
projects to continue construction of the replacement Denver VA Medical
Center. Work on this project is estimated to cease on March 29, 2015,
without additional funding. As you are aware,
Congress originally authorized and appropriated $800 million to build
the replacement Denver VA Medical Center. To date, you have provided
Congress no report on the need for a cap increase, any analysis for the
cost overruns or updates on efforts to hold properly
accountable those responsible. To consider any further funding
authorization cap increase and reprogramming request, we ask that you
respond to the following questions:
1.
We
have been informed that, as of February 26, VA has already reprogrammed
over $56 million from other sources to accommodate some of the
additional
funds that will be needed to complete the project in Denver. Please
identify any other sources of funds in addition to the $56 million which
have been reprogrammed to date.
2.
Please
identify any further reprogramming you may request, the specific
facilities impacted and the amount of funding from each facility. Also,
identify
what delays, if any, will be associated with the reprogramming of funds
from these other facilities.
3.
Please
provide the Committees with an update on the progress of the
administrative investigation board review that was convened in January
to investigate
mismanagement and misconduct concerning the replacement Denver VA
Medical Center. This progress report should also include a timeline and
summary of actions that VA has taken to ensure accountability in this
matter including but not limited to the convening
of the administrative investigation board, information on when you
anticipate the administrative investigation board will complete its
work, and when subsequent disciplinary actions, as appropriate, could be
expected. In the case of serious misconduct by
senior executives, we fully expect the Department to take action using
the enhanced authority that Congress has provided in Public Law 113-146,
“Choice Act.” Once the investigation is completed, we expect you to
provide the Committees with a list of who has
been, or will be, held accountable for the problems that occurred on
this project. Please include the names of the individuals, the
reasoning behind the decision to hold each accountable, and what
employment actions will be taken against them.
4.
Further,
the Committees understand that the Army Corps of Engineers is
conducting an independent detailed examination of VA’s major
construction programs
in order to make recommendations that can improve processes,
structures, and controls related to project delivery and oversight.
Please provide the Committee with an update on this review, with
specific regard to the replacement Denver VA Medical Center.
We ask that you respond to these
questions and provide any additional information you have concerning the
status of the replacement Denver VA Medical Center by no later than
Monday, March 16, 2015.
Thank you for your prompt consideration to our request.
Sincerely,
Jeff Miller
Johnny Isakson
Richard Blumenthal
Corrine Brown
###
The Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs is chaired by U.S. Senator Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., in the 114th Congress.
Isakson
is a veteran himself – having served in the Georgia Air National Guard
from 1966-1972 – and has been a member of the Senate VA Committee since
he joined the Senate in 2005. Isakson’s home
state of Georgia is home to more than a dozen military installations
representing each branch of the military as well as more than 750,000
veterans.
AMANDA MADDOX
|
|
Press Secretary
|
|
OFFICE OF UNITED STATES SENATOR JOHNNY ISAKSON
|
|
131 Russell Senate Office Building | Washington, DC 20510
|
|
phone: 202.224.3643
| fax: 202.228.0724
|
|
veterans
Isakson Calls for Stronger Commitment to Defeat ISIL
Wednesday the Senate Foreign Relations Committee held an important hearing on Iraq. We've covered it in the Wednesday and Thursday snapshots and will cover it in the next one. But for now we'll note this from the office of the Chair of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee Senator Johnny Isakson:
iraq
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
|
|
Wednesday, March 11, 2015
|
Marie Gordon,
770-661-0999
|
Isakson Calls for Stronger Commitment to Defeat ISIL
‘Unequivocal commitment to see this to the end’
WASHINGTON
– U.S. Senator Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., today highlighted the critical
need for Congress to provide unequivocal authority
for the use of military force to allow the president and our military
to degrade and destroy the Islamic State of Iraq and Levant, or ISIL,
and its affiliates.
At a
Senate hearing on the president’s proposed authorization for use of
military force against ISIL, Isakson called on top defense officials to
use swift and decisive action to send a bold message
to all terrorist groups and our allies that the United States will not
equivocate when it comes to protecting our homeland.
“We know that ISIL is … a growing regional threat,” said Isakson. “We all agree that the need to come together as Congress
is important. We have a united commitment as a country to fight and defeat ISIL.”
Isakson
also raised concern over the president’s proposed time limitation, or
three-year “sunset” provision, on U.S. military engagement that was
included in the authorization sent to Congress last
month.
“Wouldn't
we be better off sending a clear signal that there is no end to this
conflict as far as we are concerned until we win the victory?”
Isakson asked.
“The unequivocal commitment to see this conflict to the end is an important message to be sent,”
Isakson continued.
Secretary
of State John Kerry, Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter and General
Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, testified at
today’s Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing
on President Obama’s request for authorization of use for military
force against ISIL.
Isakson
has repeatedly called for strong military action against ISIL since the
beheading of American journalist James Foley in August 2014.
###
AMANDA MADDOX
|
|
Press Secretary
|
|
OFFICE OF UNITED STATES SENATOR JOHNNY ISAKSON
|
|
131 Russell Senate Office Building | Washington, DC 20510
|
|
phone: 202.224.3643
| fax: 202.228.0724
|
iraq
Kerry caught lying, Shi'ite fighters caught inept and still struggling
John Kerry should be thanking Hillary Clinton for both her e-mail scandal and her refusal to take accountability. ('Nah-nah-nah, it was easier for me!' is not accountability.)
The former US Secretary of State's deeds and actions has allowed many to miss that this has been the most humiliating week ever for Kerry since he became Secretary of State.
He's told one lie after another and been exposed for it.
Today, he's exposed as a liar again and, boy, does it give the right wing fresh meat if they want hop in the Way Back Machine.
Last month, he was grandstanding in Munich -- yet again acting as though he were the Secretary of Defense -- and he created a figure -- how very Brian Williams of him -- that really didn't exist as he claimed that 50% of the Islamic State's leadership had been decimated in Syria and in Iraq.
Eli Lake and Josh Rogin (Daily Beast) take on that claim today:
When asked about Kerry's 50 percent claim, Army Captain John J. Moore, a spokesman for U.S. Central Command, told us: "We currently don't have a percentage attached to that statistic."
Experts told us Kerry’s estimate is tough to understand, because defining the Islamic State’s “leadership” is subjective. Cole Bunzel, a Princeton University scholar of Near Eastern Studies who closely follows Islamic State, said its leadership structure is opaque, and not much is known about the true membership of its Shura and Sharia councils, which play an important role in the organization. When the Islamic State has announced major decisions, such as its decision to expand into Syria or declare itself a caliphate, said Bunzel, it has made clear that one or both of those councils were consulted by Baghdadi.
"I am very skeptical of the claim that the coalition has killed 50 percent of the leadership of the Islamic State, whatever that means,” said Bunzel.
He later added, "The Islamic State has publicly announced when senior members of the group have been killed. But they have never talked about anyone in the core leadership being killed since 2010."
Again, this has been a very bad week for John Reporting-For-Duty Kerry (his 2004 DNC acceptance speech in Boston).
Very bad.
Lying about kills.
See that goes to the heart of the attack the Swift Boat Veterans launched at him.
I don't believe John lied in the paper work to obtain his various combat decorations. Nor do I believe Al Gore was claiming he invented the internet. But both men set themselves up with their oversized egos and their chronic foot-in-the-mouth disease.
Meanwhile, the Tehran-Baghdad offensive in Tikrit took only 12 days -- only! -- to reach Tikrit, finally getting some feet on the ground yesterday.
Today, AFP competes to be named Most Idiotic Outlet.
Competes and, yes, wins.
Jean Marc Mojon usually his really big crayon to scribble:
Iraqi forces on Friday battled jihadists making what looked increasingly like a last stand in Tikrit but the Islamic State group responded by vowing to expand its "caliphate".
Thousands of fighters surrounded a few hundred holdout IS militants, pounding their positions from the air but treading carefully to avoid the thousands of bombs littering the city centre.
So they've defeated the Islamic State!
Wait.
A few hundred holdouts?
I guess that means -- exactly as we said would happen -- as the forces advanced -- at a snail's pace -- the Islamic State would pull the bulk of their fighters out -- remember the toothpaste analogy?
And that's what they did.
There's no victorious battle taking place.
A skeletal crew was left in Tikrit and the Shi'ite military and militia -- Iraqi and Iranian -- can't even seem to handle that.
Some in the press, like AFP, will try to portray this as a great moment.
Some will do so because they're trying to do propaganda, others because they were present and they want to make themselves seem more important than they are so they have to make the events seem more important than they are.
But this is no victory moment -- setting aside the fact that the Shi'ite forces are still scrambling -- because the reality is, they're so unqualified for the job that it took them forever to get the city and once there they couldn't even handles -- thousand of Shi'ite fighters -- a couple hundred left behind.
If this was supposed to inspire, it clearly backfired.
The following community sites -- plus Antiwar.com -- updated:
The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.
iraq
eli lake
bloomberg news
The former US Secretary of State's deeds and actions has allowed many to miss that this has been the most humiliating week ever for Kerry since he became Secretary of State.
He's told one lie after another and been exposed for it.
Today, he's exposed as a liar again and, boy, does it give the right wing fresh meat if they want hop in the Way Back Machine.
Last month, he was grandstanding in Munich -- yet again acting as though he were the Secretary of Defense -- and he created a figure -- how very Brian Williams of him -- that really didn't exist as he claimed that 50% of the Islamic State's leadership had been decimated in Syria and in Iraq.
Eli Lake and Josh Rogin (Daily Beast) take on that claim today:
When asked about Kerry's 50 percent claim, Army Captain John J. Moore, a spokesman for U.S. Central Command, told us: "We currently don't have a percentage attached to that statistic."
Experts told us Kerry’s estimate is tough to understand, because defining the Islamic State’s “leadership” is subjective. Cole Bunzel, a Princeton University scholar of Near Eastern Studies who closely follows Islamic State, said its leadership structure is opaque, and not much is known about the true membership of its Shura and Sharia councils, which play an important role in the organization. When the Islamic State has announced major decisions, such as its decision to expand into Syria or declare itself a caliphate, said Bunzel, it has made clear that one or both of those councils were consulted by Baghdadi.
"I am very skeptical of the claim that the coalition has killed 50 percent of the leadership of the Islamic State, whatever that means,” said Bunzel.
He later added, "The Islamic State has publicly announced when senior members of the group have been killed. But they have never talked about anyone in the core leadership being killed since 2010."
Again, this has been a very bad week for John Reporting-For-Duty Kerry (his 2004 DNC acceptance speech in Boston).
Very bad.
Lying about kills.
See that goes to the heart of the attack the Swift Boat Veterans launched at him.
I don't believe John lied in the paper work to obtain his various combat decorations. Nor do I believe Al Gore was claiming he invented the internet. But both men set themselves up with their oversized egos and their chronic foot-in-the-mouth disease.
Meanwhile, the Tehran-Baghdad offensive in Tikrit took only 12 days -- only! -- to reach Tikrit, finally getting some feet on the ground yesterday.
Today, AFP competes to be named Most Idiotic Outlet.
Competes and, yes, wins.
Jean Marc Mojon usually his really big crayon to scribble:
Iraqi forces on Friday battled jihadists making what looked increasingly like a last stand in Tikrit but the Islamic State group responded by vowing to expand its "caliphate".
Thousands of fighters surrounded a few hundred holdout IS militants, pounding their positions from the air but treading carefully to avoid the thousands of bombs littering the city centre.
So they've defeated the Islamic State!
Wait.
A few hundred holdouts?
I guess that means -- exactly as we said would happen -- as the forces advanced -- at a snail's pace -- the Islamic State would pull the bulk of their fighters out -- remember the toothpaste analogy?
And that's what they did.
There's no victorious battle taking place.
A skeletal crew was left in Tikrit and the Shi'ite military and militia -- Iraqi and Iranian -- can't even seem to handle that.
Some in the press, like AFP, will try to portray this as a great moment.
Some will do so because they're trying to do propaganda, others because they were present and they want to make themselves seem more important than they are so they have to make the events seem more important than they are.
But this is no victory moment -- setting aside the fact that the Shi'ite forces are still scrambling -- because the reality is, they're so unqualified for the job that it took them forever to get the city and once there they couldn't even handles -- thousand of Shi'ite fighters -- a couple hundred left behind.
If this was supposed to inspire, it clearly backfired.
The following community sites -- plus Antiwar.com -- updated:
Iran in Iraq
4 hours ago
Brief
4 hours ago
Greenwald
4 hours ago
margaux's bugger and a dumb plot point (revenge)
4 hours ago
About the hearing coverage
4 hours ago
Hillary's e-mails
4 hours ago
Well it's her idea of fun
1y hours ago
The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.
iraq
eli lake
bloomberg news
Thursday, March 12, 2015
Iraq snapshot
Thursday, March 13, 2015. Chaos and violence continue, the Iraqi forces violence against Sunnis gets serious media attention, CodeStink needs to pack it in having done too much damage (they aren't the only ones doing damage), and much more.
On the Thursday broadcast of ABC World News with David Muir, Iraq was covered:
David Muir: Now to new fall out after our ABC investigation last night. It involves the fight against ISIS known for those awful videos, lining up their victims on the beach. And now a new concern. Are some of the Iraqi forces -- trained and paid for by US taxpayers -- using techniques that are just as brutal? Well the State Dept tonight responding to our report and ABC's chief investigative reporter Brian Ross back on the job tonight.
Brian Ross: The State Dept called these scenes today serious and distuuing. Brutal images of what appear to be Iraqi forces and militias carrying out, celebrating, torture and beheadings. In this torture scene, two US weapons against the wall. This video shows two civilians, pleading for their lives, about to be shot dead. A man with an American supplied weapon walks by, a gunman with what appears to be the insignia of Iraqi Special Forces caught on tape.
US State Dept spokesperson Jen Psaki: Their behavior must be above reproach or they risk being painted with the same brush as ISIL fighters.
Brian Ross: The Pentagon says it has already cut off money to some Iraqi units because of gross human rights violations. But Senator Patrick Leahy says the ABC News report shows the government should cut off money to more Iraqi units.
Senator Patrick Leahy: When you look at at the videos and look at the uniforms being worn, do we really want to say the US condones that?
Brian Ross: US officials tonight tell ABC News that America's top military leader Gen Martin Dempsey, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, has repeatedly warned Iraqi leaders about the conduct of the Iraqi military and the militias that fight with them -- especially because the US is sending $1.5 billion to the Iraqi army and almost 3,000 American troops to help train them.
At the link, you'll find not only the video report, but also a text article and a photo essay. James Gordon Meek, Brian Ross, Rym Momtaz and Alex Hosenball did the previous ABC News report on this topic.
The Jen Psaki moment in the transcript above is from today's State Dept press briefing.
Jen is shown looking down at her notebook and reading a pre-written statement.
She's ridiculous and shameful. Let's move to that moment at today's briefing:
QUESTION: There’s some really disturbing images coming out of Iraq, which appear to show uniformed Iraqi soldiers committing atrocities – beheadings, torture. Are you – I mean, Iraq has said they’re investigating. Do you have confidence in their investigation, their ability to investigate this alone? Will you, the State Department, do any investigating? That’s the first question.
MS. PSAKI: Sure. Well, these are clearly disturbing and serious allegations, ones that we’ve, unfortunately, spoken about many times before, including from this podium, because we’ve been – there have been a range of reports out there for some time about these types of abuses. So we’re, of course, deeply concerned by the reports. The Iraqi Government, as you mentioned, has indicated that it will investigate to determine the facts behind these claims. We urge it to conduct a transparent, thorough, and timely investigation.
I would also note that Prime Minister Abadi, I think including in his inaugural remarks, spoke about this, has stated that he – not about this specifically, but about efforts to kind of address unregulated militias, which is part of the problem – has stated that he has a zero-tolerance policy of human rights abuses by any security element. U.S. officials from Washington and Baghdad continue to raise our concerns with senior Government of Iraq officials, and we have been doing that for some time.
This behavior is clearly – their behavior must be above reproach or they risk being painted with the same brush as ISIL fighters. And certainly that’s a message that we are making clear. But they’ve indicated they’re investigating. There’s no plans for the United States Government to investigate, no.
QUESTION: Okay. But do they not also risk, then, the U.S. sort of cutting off funding and pulling out of the coalition and sort of stopping their involvement?
MS. PSAKI: Well, we have withheld assistance from certain Iraqi units on the basis of credible information in the past. There’s an entire process of review that happens. And certainly if new information surfaced that warranted that – the Leahy law being put into effect, we would do the same thing.
QUESTION: Right. So unlikely that you would – as a result of these types of crimes, if proven true – I mean, there’s images supporting them at this point. But if proven true, it’s unlikely that you would do some sort of broad pullout of Iraq as a result, just stopping financing to certain brigades?
MS. PSAKI: Well, there are laws in place, that have been in place for time, that we have applied to some Iraqi units. And certainly we would continue to apply those if applicable. Obviously we look at any information that was available, including reports and media reports as well. But I’m not going to prejudge what that would mean in the future.
That's not the law and the State Dept looks like a pack of idiot War Criminals right now.
The US government is not allowed to pick and choose -- per the law -- which parts of a military they give assistance to. The law is that when incidents like the above take place, the US government has to cut off all military assistance.
That's the law.
I thought Jen was leaving. I thought she was taking her lying to the White House?
After today, she can't leave soon enough.
There is spin and there is whoring.
We've been rather kind to Jen here. Marie Harf, not so much. But Jen's largely gotten a pass because she's usually been professional not whorish.
When she stands in front of the press and lies through her teeth about the law -- to cover for War Crimes -- she's nothing but a cheap whore.
She has no shame and she clearly has no ethics.
The Leahy Amendment does not say: If the government the US is sending military aid to has human rights abuses (War Crimes), the US government must ensure that the 'good' elements of the military receive money and weapons.
The law says when these human rights abuses take place, the aid is to be immediately cut.
The State Dept is a disgrace today.
John Kerry's confused himself with Secretary of Defense throughout his tenure as Secretary of State.
It is shameful.
And it should be criminal for a spokesperson to lie about what the law says.
What the trashy liar doesn't tell the press briefing is that the US government is refusing to investigate because such an investigation -- if the charges bore out (and they will) -- would mean -- Leahy Amendment or not -- the US drop all aid immediately or be guilty of supporting the War Crimes, of funding the War Crimes.
This goes beyond the Leahy Amendment and goes to charters and treaties the US government has signed.
Jen Psaki lied.
She disgraced herself.
She disgraced the State Dept (which I'm sure Kerry is happy about because he's become such a liar himself).
She betrayed democracy and open government with the effort to lie and deceive the American people.
Spin is one thing. We've let her spin in the past and rolled our eyes over it.
This was deceit, this was trickery.
Some are pointing out that the Pentagon had held off funds.
That's even worse.
The Pentagon came to the conclusion that certain funds shouldn't go to certain parts of the Iraqi forces because of human rights abuses (War Crimes).
Those decisions -- which, again, are not legal, legal is all or nothing -- should have been conveyed to the American people.
It's the American people who are footing the bill.
It is the American people the administration is supposed to serve -- Serve.
And they lied.
The Pentagon lied.
It lied by not informing the American people.
This isn't 'national security.'
This shouldn't be 'classified.'
It is the willful disregard of the American people, of democracy and of informed consent that has been the hallmark of Barack Obama's tenure as President of the United States.
He has made a mockery of transparency and of his own claim, prior to becoming president, that his administration would be open.
And Barack himself should have told the American people the news that the Pentagon had learned that certain elements in the Iraqi forces were committing human rights abuses (War Crimes).
Maybe he'll again insist that he didn't know until the press just reported it.
Last week we noted, starting with the March 5th snapshot, Iraqi forces surrounding an 11-year-old boy. This is video. It's not in dispute. The child is sitting in the middle of the street as he is bullied and threatened by Iraqi forces and then they execute this child.
These things are not in dispute.
I long ago noted being sickened by the video where Iraqi forces burned a man alive.
It's over a year later.
Mountains of documented cases of these abuses.
CodeStink.
They set themselves up as our saviors on the left.
The nothing but attention getting problem makers.
At yesterday's hearing, one was evicted after screaming about "killing people."
The tired point being made was that any war is going to result in killing -- and that will include populations -- civilians -- caught up in the war.
Yes, CodeStink, we all know that. We all get that.
The Iraq War's been going on since 2003.
Over a million Iraqi civilians have died of violence during just the early part of the war.
After the CodeStinker was flushed from the hearing, John Kerry went to town.
Because they'd set him up perfectly.
He preened and grinned, he really did, as he tried to act stern and angry and insisted that if CodeStink was so concerned about killings, they should ask the families of the American journalists who were killed and they should consider the Jordanian pilot who was burned alive. That was it. Of all the victims of the Islamic State, that was it for Kerry. Didn't care about the aid workers, for example.
If CodeStink had been doing their job, they would have joined me in calling out the abuses of the Iraqi forces.
But for over a year they've ignored.
Maybe they don't care, maybe they're too stupid.
I think they're too lazy to do the work required and that's why, whenever they talk the Iraq War, they don't have a single thing to say that they weren't already saying before Barack became president. Six years of the war, the most recent six, are erased or ignored by CodeStink.
So a CodeStinker gave Kerry the moment he wanted where he couldn't pretend he was so moral and upstanding. (I know John. I like him outside of his office. But I'd never accuse of being upstanding or ethical in his work as Secretary of State.)
Now if the CodeStinker had done any work required, the shout would have been, "Why are we funding this war and these forces when they are killing Iraqi civilians!"
And Kerry would have responded.
And since ABC News hadn't broken the story yet and since Kerry repeatedly lied throughout the hearing, he would have lied on this.
And CodeStink could have had credit, in the hours that passed, for setting Kerry up to get caught in a lie.
Instead they're just useless.
Yesterday's snapshot covered the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Cedric's "John Kerry has a hissy" and Wally's "THIS JUST IN! AND THE HUFFY BIKE HE RODE IN ON!" humor joint-post covered it, Wally covered it also in "Is there a bigger bitch than John Kerry (Wally)," Kat covered it with "I honestly feel sorry for Barack Obama," Ann covered it with "How afraid of us is the US government?" -- this is about the police presence at the hearing and that was appalling -- and Ava covered it with "John Kerry's become a bully and a bore (Ava)."
Let me start with Ava's real quick. At Antiwar.com, Lucy Steigerwald has a new column tonight entitled "Loving America Means Letting It Go to War" and I thought, "Well good. Someone else is picking up on the points of the hearing that bothered Ava." No. Lucy can't be bothered with the hearing so she does a 'greatest hits.' She plays the jukebox and there's nothing breathing or alive in her dead prose. As Ava points out, John Kerry ridiculously attempted to blackmail the Committee. They had to vote for the AUMF, he insisted, or the terrorists win. And if Congress votes for it and it barely passes? The terrorists still win.
Kerry invoked 9/11 and everything else in an attempt to shame Congress into voting for war.
Someone needs to inform Lucy. Her headline was topical. Her tired column was not.
I really don't get these people -- and I've called them out for years -- at least since 2006 -- who think they can dust off their past remarks about Iraq and 'repurpose' those remarks into a 'new' column on Iraq.
And it's offensive and it's damaging.
John Kerry lied repeatedly to the Committee.
Never more so than when he rewrote history regarding al Qaeda in Mesopotamia.
And he gets away with it because of lazy whores on the left.
They're not new to my side.
They've been lazy since at least 2006.
And by their constant whoring to blame everything on Bully Boy Bush, they allow a John Kerry to invoke 9/11 before a Senate Committee to argue for further war on Iraq and to claim a link between Iraq and 9/11.
You need to get your heads out of your asses and start grasping -- and talking and writing about -- what happened from 2010 to 2014. If you can't do that, please, find another topic because the world cannot afford your lies and stupidity.
You have created an environment in which John Kerry can falsely link 9/11 to Iraq.
You created that by ignoring reality because you're lazy and also because your life's goal is not to help Iraqis but instead to provide cover for Barack Obama.
You're whores.
You're disgusting.
The Iraqi protesters -- not that any of you ever acknowledged it -- called on Barack for help.
And he ignored them.
For example, in March of 2013, activists in Samarra put their message on display.
"Obama, If you Cannot Hear Us Can you Not See Us?"
The following month, Sunnis would be slaughtered at a protest elsewhere.
April 23, 2013 massacre of a sit-in in Hawija which resulted from Nouri's federal forces storming in. Alsumaria noted Kirkuk's Department of Health (Hawija is in Kirkuk) announced 50 activists have died and 110 were injured in the assault. AFP reported the death toll eventually (as some wounded died) rose to 53 dead. UNICEF noted that the dead included 8 children (twelve more were injured).
And Barack, the White House and the State Dept could offer nothing but 'we call for both sides to be careful.'
Nouri's forces slaughtered 8 children.
The BRussells Tribunal carried the account of survivor Thamer Hussein Mousa who lost his son Mohammed Thamer, who saw his son killed by Nouri's forces. What did he say?
"I hold Obama responsible for this act because he is the one who gave them these weapons. The weapons and aircrafts they used and fired upon us were American weapons. I also hold the United States of America responsible for this criminal act, above all, Obama."
So you're tired bulls**t about what Bully Boy Bush did in 2003 is worthless and cowardly.
That's if you're Noam Chomsky, CodeStink, whomever you are.
You have ignored War Crimes in Iraq and provided Barack Obama the cover to ignore them as well.
You cheap little whores -- and, yes, that's you Noam, you endorsed Barack don't pretend you didn't now -- insisted that, if he became president, you would hold his feet to the fire.
You never did.
And Iraq suffered because of you.
You're as guilty as Barack Obama.
You're as guilty as Bully Boy Bush.
You're craven, whorish and shameful.
So stop telling us about 2003 because that was a lifetime for Iraq -- it is a very young population.
Under Barack, things have been as bad and arguably worse.
Iraqis went to the polls in 2010 wanting change. They voted for Iraqiya. Nouri's State of Law came in second. Nouri lost.
But Barack refused to allow the Iraqi people to choose their own leader. He refused to respect democracy.
When Nouri al-Maliki wouldn't step down, Barack didn't demand it. Instead, he has US officials negotiate a contract (The Erbil Agreement) which gave Nouri a second term.
This is what set everything in motion for the crises today.
We documented in real time. We've documented it since.
If you can't be honest, just don't speak.
Find another thing to pretend you care about.
Your lies are hurting Iraqis and have hurt Iraqis.
Back to Ann.
So we, the American people, now have to put up with a non-stop police presence at a Congressional hearing.
Thank you, CodeStink.
You're worthless attention getters whose behavior has become self-parody.
And now, thanks to you, we have to have armed police standing in the aisles of a Congressional hearing.
I mean, if you ever accomplished anything with your little stunts, I'd be fine with your actions.
But you're a disgrace.
And it was probably your behavior with Condi Rice that will be cited as the excuse for what's now going to be the new policy at Congressional hearings.
For those who missed, CodeStink's ridiculous Diane -- we won't promote her by giving her full name, we used to promote her book and other things she asked for but that ended after the stunt she pulled -- she wanted to call out Condi.
Okay.
Fine.
Even fine to disrupt the hearing to do so.
But here's where Diane crossed the line.
With red paint on her hands -- to symbolize blood -- she stood right in front of Condi -- in the middle of a hearing -- shoving her hands at Condi's face.
I'm not a fan of Condi Rice. I've never even bothered to learn the spelling of her first name.
I think she was part of a criminal administration.
So I really didn't appreciate Diane making me feel sorry for Condi.
Or Diane making me note how Condi responded to this 2007 outrageous act with grace.
Standing up in a hearing and unfurling a banner is one thing.
Heckling or shouting is one thing.
I can support those actions regardless of whether or not I agree with the message being shouted or on a banner or whatever.
But when you act in a way that makes you look nuts and your actions involve thrusting your hands at someone in a hearing?
If Diane had been tasered (or is it tazed?), I wouldn't have objected.
Her actions were outrageous and Condi -- or security -- could have made the logical conclusion that this crazy woman was a threat.
(They could have done the same with Medea I-Need-Attention Benjamin who refused to leave and made police drag her -- across people sitting at the hearing -- she's not a woman of peace, she's an idiot and a nut case. You are asked to leave, leave.)
Because of that nutty behavior and so much more, we're apparently -- now that the Republicans are in charge of the Senate -- going to have to endure armed police standing on each aisle throughout a hearing, staring down those gathered to exercise their right to attend a Congressional hearing..
It's intimidating and it needs to stop.
I'm calling out the Republican leadership for doing this.
I'm also calling out CodeStink whose actions have resulted in the Republican response.
CodeStink has outlived its purpose.
Jason Ditz (Antiwar.com) notes the Pentagon is denying reports that US bombings killed 22 Iraqi soldiers in Anbar, "Denials from US officials are common, and not always credible. It is hard to imagine, likewise, that the US launched only a single airstrike in the whole Anbar Province in an entire day." Margaret Griffis (Antiwar.com) counts 214 dead across Iraq from violence (read her report and not just the headline before you e-mail me that the number is 208).
iraq
abc news
james gordon meek
Brian Ross
rym momtaz
alex hosenball
david muir
abc world news
antiwar.com
margaret griffis
jason ditz
On the Thursday broadcast of ABC World News with David Muir, Iraq was covered:
David Muir: Now to new fall out after our ABC investigation last night. It involves the fight against ISIS known for those awful videos, lining up their victims on the beach. And now a new concern. Are some of the Iraqi forces -- trained and paid for by US taxpayers -- using techniques that are just as brutal? Well the State Dept tonight responding to our report and ABC's chief investigative reporter Brian Ross back on the job tonight.
Brian Ross: The State Dept called these scenes today serious and distuuing. Brutal images of what appear to be Iraqi forces and militias carrying out, celebrating, torture and beheadings. In this torture scene, two US weapons against the wall. This video shows two civilians, pleading for their lives, about to be shot dead. A man with an American supplied weapon walks by, a gunman with what appears to be the insignia of Iraqi Special Forces caught on tape.
US State Dept spokesperson Jen Psaki: Their behavior must be above reproach or they risk being painted with the same brush as ISIL fighters.
Brian Ross: The Pentagon says it has already cut off money to some Iraqi units because of gross human rights violations. But Senator Patrick Leahy says the ABC News report shows the government should cut off money to more Iraqi units.
Senator Patrick Leahy: When you look at at the videos and look at the uniforms being worn, do we really want to say the US condones that?
Brian Ross: US officials tonight tell ABC News that America's top military leader Gen Martin Dempsey, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, has repeatedly warned Iraqi leaders about the conduct of the Iraqi military and the militias that fight with them -- especially because the US is sending $1.5 billion to the Iraqi army and almost 3,000 American troops to help train them.
At the link, you'll find not only the video report, but also a text article and a photo essay. James Gordon Meek, Brian Ross, Rym Momtaz and Alex Hosenball did the previous ABC News report on this topic.
The Jen Psaki moment in the transcript above is from today's State Dept press briefing.
Jen is shown looking down at her notebook and reading a pre-written statement.
She's ridiculous and shameful. Let's move to that moment at today's briefing:
QUESTION: There’s some really disturbing images coming out of Iraq, which appear to show uniformed Iraqi soldiers committing atrocities – beheadings, torture. Are you – I mean, Iraq has said they’re investigating. Do you have confidence in their investigation, their ability to investigate this alone? Will you, the State Department, do any investigating? That’s the first question.
MS. PSAKI: Sure. Well, these are clearly disturbing and serious allegations, ones that we’ve, unfortunately, spoken about many times before, including from this podium, because we’ve been – there have been a range of reports out there for some time about these types of abuses. So we’re, of course, deeply concerned by the reports. The Iraqi Government, as you mentioned, has indicated that it will investigate to determine the facts behind these claims. We urge it to conduct a transparent, thorough, and timely investigation.
I would also note that Prime Minister Abadi, I think including in his inaugural remarks, spoke about this, has stated that he – not about this specifically, but about efforts to kind of address unregulated militias, which is part of the problem – has stated that he has a zero-tolerance policy of human rights abuses by any security element. U.S. officials from Washington and Baghdad continue to raise our concerns with senior Government of Iraq officials, and we have been doing that for some time.
This behavior is clearly – their behavior must be above reproach or they risk being painted with the same brush as ISIL fighters. And certainly that’s a message that we are making clear. But they’ve indicated they’re investigating. There’s no plans for the United States Government to investigate, no.
QUESTION: Okay. But do they not also risk, then, the U.S. sort of cutting off funding and pulling out of the coalition and sort of stopping their involvement?
MS. PSAKI: Well, we have withheld assistance from certain Iraqi units on the basis of credible information in the past. There’s an entire process of review that happens. And certainly if new information surfaced that warranted that – the Leahy law being put into effect, we would do the same thing.
QUESTION: Right. So unlikely that you would – as a result of these types of crimes, if proven true – I mean, there’s images supporting them at this point. But if proven true, it’s unlikely that you would do some sort of broad pullout of Iraq as a result, just stopping financing to certain brigades?
MS. PSAKI: Well, there are laws in place, that have been in place for time, that we have applied to some Iraqi units. And certainly we would continue to apply those if applicable. Obviously we look at any information that was available, including reports and media reports as well. But I’m not going to prejudge what that would mean in the future.
That's not the law and the State Dept looks like a pack of idiot War Criminals right now.
The US government is not allowed to pick and choose -- per the law -- which parts of a military they give assistance to. The law is that when incidents like the above take place, the US government has to cut off all military assistance.
That's the law.
I thought Jen was leaving. I thought she was taking her lying to the White House?
After today, she can't leave soon enough.
There is spin and there is whoring.
We've been rather kind to Jen here. Marie Harf, not so much. But Jen's largely gotten a pass because she's usually been professional not whorish.
When she stands in front of the press and lies through her teeth about the law -- to cover for War Crimes -- she's nothing but a cheap whore.
She has no shame and she clearly has no ethics.
The Leahy Amendment does not say: If the government the US is sending military aid to has human rights abuses (War Crimes), the US government must ensure that the 'good' elements of the military receive money and weapons.
The law says when these human rights abuses take place, the aid is to be immediately cut.
The State Dept is a disgrace today.
John Kerry's confused himself with Secretary of Defense throughout his tenure as Secretary of State.
It is shameful.
And it should be criminal for a spokesperson to lie about what the law says.
What the trashy liar doesn't tell the press briefing is that the US government is refusing to investigate because such an investigation -- if the charges bore out (and they will) -- would mean -- Leahy Amendment or not -- the US drop all aid immediately or be guilty of supporting the War Crimes, of funding the War Crimes.
This goes beyond the Leahy Amendment and goes to charters and treaties the US government has signed.
Jen Psaki lied.
She disgraced herself.
She disgraced the State Dept (which I'm sure Kerry is happy about because he's become such a liar himself).
She betrayed democracy and open government with the effort to lie and deceive the American people.
Spin is one thing. We've let her spin in the past and rolled our eyes over it.
This was deceit, this was trickery.
Some are pointing out that the Pentagon had held off funds.
That's even worse.
The Pentagon came to the conclusion that certain funds shouldn't go to certain parts of the Iraqi forces because of human rights abuses (War Crimes).
Those decisions -- which, again, are not legal, legal is all or nothing -- should have been conveyed to the American people.
It's the American people who are footing the bill.
It is the American people the administration is supposed to serve -- Serve.
And they lied.
The Pentagon lied.
It lied by not informing the American people.
This isn't 'national security.'
This shouldn't be 'classified.'
It is the willful disregard of the American people, of democracy and of informed consent that has been the hallmark of Barack Obama's tenure as President of the United States.
He has made a mockery of transparency and of his own claim, prior to becoming president, that his administration would be open.
And Barack himself should have told the American people the news that the Pentagon had learned that certain elements in the Iraqi forces were committing human rights abuses (War Crimes).
Maybe he'll again insist that he didn't know until the press just reported it.
Last week we noted, starting with the March 5th snapshot, Iraqi forces surrounding an 11-year-old boy. This is video. It's not in dispute. The child is sitting in the middle of the street as he is bullied and threatened by Iraqi forces and then they execute this child.
These things are not in dispute.
I long ago noted being sickened by the video where Iraqi forces burned a man alive.
It's over a year later.
Mountains of documented cases of these abuses.
CodeStink.
They set themselves up as our saviors on the left.
The nothing but attention getting problem makers.
At yesterday's hearing, one was evicted after screaming about "killing people."
The tired point being made was that any war is going to result in killing -- and that will include populations -- civilians -- caught up in the war.
Yes, CodeStink, we all know that. We all get that.
The Iraq War's been going on since 2003.
Over a million Iraqi civilians have died of violence during just the early part of the war.
After the CodeStinker was flushed from the hearing, John Kerry went to town.
Because they'd set him up perfectly.
He preened and grinned, he really did, as he tried to act stern and angry and insisted that if CodeStink was so concerned about killings, they should ask the families of the American journalists who were killed and they should consider the Jordanian pilot who was burned alive. That was it. Of all the victims of the Islamic State, that was it for Kerry. Didn't care about the aid workers, for example.
If CodeStink had been doing their job, they would have joined me in calling out the abuses of the Iraqi forces.
But for over a year they've ignored.
Maybe they don't care, maybe they're too stupid.
I think they're too lazy to do the work required and that's why, whenever they talk the Iraq War, they don't have a single thing to say that they weren't already saying before Barack became president. Six years of the war, the most recent six, are erased or ignored by CodeStink.
So a CodeStinker gave Kerry the moment he wanted where he couldn't pretend he was so moral and upstanding. (I know John. I like him outside of his office. But I'd never accuse of being upstanding or ethical in his work as Secretary of State.)
Now if the CodeStinker had done any work required, the shout would have been, "Why are we funding this war and these forces when they are killing Iraqi civilians!"
And Kerry would have responded.
And since ABC News hadn't broken the story yet and since Kerry repeatedly lied throughout the hearing, he would have lied on this.
And CodeStink could have had credit, in the hours that passed, for setting Kerry up to get caught in a lie.
Instead they're just useless.
Yesterday's snapshot covered the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Cedric's "John Kerry has a hissy" and Wally's "THIS JUST IN! AND THE HUFFY BIKE HE RODE IN ON!" humor joint-post covered it, Wally covered it also in "Is there a bigger bitch than John Kerry (Wally)," Kat covered it with "I honestly feel sorry for Barack Obama," Ann covered it with "How afraid of us is the US government?" -- this is about the police presence at the hearing and that was appalling -- and Ava covered it with "John Kerry's become a bully and a bore (Ava)."
Let me start with Ava's real quick. At Antiwar.com, Lucy Steigerwald has a new column tonight entitled "Loving America Means Letting It Go to War" and I thought, "Well good. Someone else is picking up on the points of the hearing that bothered Ava." No. Lucy can't be bothered with the hearing so she does a 'greatest hits.' She plays the jukebox and there's nothing breathing or alive in her dead prose. As Ava points out, John Kerry ridiculously attempted to blackmail the Committee. They had to vote for the AUMF, he insisted, or the terrorists win. And if Congress votes for it and it barely passes? The terrorists still win.
Kerry invoked 9/11 and everything else in an attempt to shame Congress into voting for war.
Someone needs to inform Lucy. Her headline was topical. Her tired column was not.
I really don't get these people -- and I've called them out for years -- at least since 2006 -- who think they can dust off their past remarks about Iraq and 'repurpose' those remarks into a 'new' column on Iraq.
And it's offensive and it's damaging.
John Kerry lied repeatedly to the Committee.
Never more so than when he rewrote history regarding al Qaeda in Mesopotamia.
And he gets away with it because of lazy whores on the left.
They're not new to my side.
They've been lazy since at least 2006.
And by their constant whoring to blame everything on Bully Boy Bush, they allow a John Kerry to invoke 9/11 before a Senate Committee to argue for further war on Iraq and to claim a link between Iraq and 9/11.
You need to get your heads out of your asses and start grasping -- and talking and writing about -- what happened from 2010 to 2014. If you can't do that, please, find another topic because the world cannot afford your lies and stupidity.
You have created an environment in which John Kerry can falsely link 9/11 to Iraq.
You created that by ignoring reality because you're lazy and also because your life's goal is not to help Iraqis but instead to provide cover for Barack Obama.
You're whores.
You're disgusting.
The Iraqi protesters -- not that any of you ever acknowledged it -- called on Barack for help.
And he ignored them.
For example, in March of 2013, activists in Samarra put their message on display.
"Obama, If you Cannot Hear Us Can you Not See Us?"
The following month, Sunnis would be slaughtered at a protest elsewhere.
April 23, 2013 massacre of a sit-in in Hawija which resulted from Nouri's federal forces storming in. Alsumaria noted Kirkuk's Department of Health (Hawija is in Kirkuk) announced 50 activists have died and 110 were injured in the assault. AFP reported the death toll eventually (as some wounded died) rose to 53 dead. UNICEF noted that the dead included 8 children (twelve more were injured).
And Barack, the White House and the State Dept could offer nothing but 'we call for both sides to be careful.'
Nouri's forces slaughtered 8 children.
The BRussells Tribunal carried the account of survivor Thamer Hussein Mousa who lost his son Mohammed Thamer, who saw his son killed by Nouri's forces. What did he say?
"I hold Obama responsible for this act because he is the one who gave them these weapons. The weapons and aircrafts they used and fired upon us were American weapons. I also hold the United States of America responsible for this criminal act, above all, Obama."
So you're tired bulls**t about what Bully Boy Bush did in 2003 is worthless and cowardly.
That's if you're Noam Chomsky, CodeStink, whomever you are.
You have ignored War Crimes in Iraq and provided Barack Obama the cover to ignore them as well.
You cheap little whores -- and, yes, that's you Noam, you endorsed Barack don't pretend you didn't now -- insisted that, if he became president, you would hold his feet to the fire.
You never did.
And Iraq suffered because of you.
You're as guilty as Barack Obama.
You're as guilty as Bully Boy Bush.
You're craven, whorish and shameful.
So stop telling us about 2003 because that was a lifetime for Iraq -- it is a very young population.
Under Barack, things have been as bad and arguably worse.
Iraqis went to the polls in 2010 wanting change. They voted for Iraqiya. Nouri's State of Law came in second. Nouri lost.
But Barack refused to allow the Iraqi people to choose their own leader. He refused to respect democracy.
When Nouri al-Maliki wouldn't step down, Barack didn't demand it. Instead, he has US officials negotiate a contract (The Erbil Agreement) which gave Nouri a second term.
This is what set everything in motion for the crises today.
We documented in real time. We've documented it since.
If you can't be honest, just don't speak.
Find another thing to pretend you care about.
Your lies are hurting Iraqis and have hurt Iraqis.
Back to Ann.
So we, the American people, now have to put up with a non-stop police presence at a Congressional hearing.
Thank you, CodeStink.
You're worthless attention getters whose behavior has become self-parody.
And now, thanks to you, we have to have armed police standing in the aisles of a Congressional hearing.
I mean, if you ever accomplished anything with your little stunts, I'd be fine with your actions.
But you're a disgrace.
And it was probably your behavior with Condi Rice that will be cited as the excuse for what's now going to be the new policy at Congressional hearings.
For those who missed, CodeStink's ridiculous Diane -- we won't promote her by giving her full name, we used to promote her book and other things she asked for but that ended after the stunt she pulled -- she wanted to call out Condi.
Okay.
Fine.
Even fine to disrupt the hearing to do so.
But here's where Diane crossed the line.
With red paint on her hands -- to symbolize blood -- she stood right in front of Condi -- in the middle of a hearing -- shoving her hands at Condi's face.
I'm not a fan of Condi Rice. I've never even bothered to learn the spelling of her first name.
I think she was part of a criminal administration.
So I really didn't appreciate Diane making me feel sorry for Condi.
Or Diane making me note how Condi responded to this 2007 outrageous act with grace.
Standing up in a hearing and unfurling a banner is one thing.
Heckling or shouting is one thing.
I can support those actions regardless of whether or not I agree with the message being shouted or on a banner or whatever.
But when you act in a way that makes you look nuts and your actions involve thrusting your hands at someone in a hearing?
If Diane had been tasered (or is it tazed?), I wouldn't have objected.
Her actions were outrageous and Condi -- or security -- could have made the logical conclusion that this crazy woman was a threat.
(They could have done the same with Medea I-Need-Attention Benjamin who refused to leave and made police drag her -- across people sitting at the hearing -- she's not a woman of peace, she's an idiot and a nut case. You are asked to leave, leave.)
Because of that nutty behavior and so much more, we're apparently -- now that the Republicans are in charge of the Senate -- going to have to endure armed police standing on each aisle throughout a hearing, staring down those gathered to exercise their right to attend a Congressional hearing..
It's intimidating and it needs to stop.
I'm calling out the Republican leadership for doing this.
I'm also calling out CodeStink whose actions have resulted in the Republican response.
CodeStink has outlived its purpose.
Jason Ditz (Antiwar.com) notes the Pentagon is denying reports that US bombings killed 22 Iraqi soldiers in Anbar, "Denials from US officials are common, and not always credible. It is hard to imagine, likewise, that the US launched only a single airstrike in the whole Anbar Province in an entire day." Margaret Griffis (Antiwar.com) counts 214 dead across Iraq from violence (read her report and not just the headline before you e-mail me that the number is 208).
iraq
abc news
james gordon meek
Brian Ross
rym momtaz
alex hosenball
david muir
abc world news
antiwar.com
margaret griffis
jason ditz