Tuesday, December 9, 2025. Labor Rights and Labor Law matter -- a few attorneys need to learn that even if they find the topic not as sexy or glamorous as Free Speech issues, Donald Chump continues to flounder in the polls and drags the GOP down with him, Kristi Noem has legal problems and so do her ICE agents, Sean Duffy really wants to be Trophy Wife, Robert Kennedy Jr. cannot do even one chin up, THE NEW YORK TIMES' David E. Sanger betrays journalism to cover for Chump, and much more.
A dozen F.B.I.
agents fired this year for having knelt during a racial justice protest
in 2020 sued the bureau’s director, Kash Patel, and the Trump
administration on Monday, arguing that they had been unjustly punished
for de-escalating a potentially dangerous situation.
The
suit involves one of the largest groups of former law enforcement
officials to challenge the Trump administration in court over its
continuing purge of personnel at the Justice Department and F.B.I. Mr.
Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi have vowed to end what they call
weaponization of government, which they define as Democratic officials
pursuing criminal investigations of President Trump and conservatives.
So far, that has meant firing many senior career officials, as well as
lower-level agents and prosecutors who worked on investigations related
to Mr. Trump.
Mary Dohrmann, a lawyer
representing the agents filing suit on Monday, warned of the
repercussions given that the administration summarily removed about 16 agents
who worked on counterintelligence and counterterrorism. “The country is
less safe than it was before these F.B.I. agents were fired en masse,”
she said.
She added that the abrupt
dismissals violated the F.B.I.’s rules, which protect not only the
agents but also the country by “ensuring that people who are highly
trained and effective are employed at the F.B.I.” Ms. Dohrmann took the
case as part of the Washington Litigation Group, which was formed this
spring by former Justice Department lawyers seeking to defend the rule
of law.
You know what that says to me? Blah blah blah I'm a f**king idiot. I'm not calling the writers an idiot but I am calling Mary Dohrmann an idiot and anyone else responsible for this legal strategy.
You're job is to help your client. I am so sick of attorneys with something to prove or some point to make that they ignore the real issue.
The real issue is not taking a knee.
Last week, Ava and I wrote "Media: Chump's administration doesn't even grasp the firing process." It applies here as well. David Maltinsky worked for the FBI. His attorneys want to make this a Free Speech case. That could go either way under the Supreme Court -- most likely David loses under the Supreme Court. David was fired for displaying a Pride Flag. LGBTQ+ issues don't really matter to the Supreme Court which regularly finds that LGBTQ+ people are not full persons. The Court regularly rules that they are second class citizens.
Do I believe that? Hell no. But were I David's attorney, I should know the climate we're currently in with regrds to the crooked Supreme Court. And I should be doing the best I can, in this climate, to ensure my clients prevails in court.
David wants to be let back in the FBI to complete his training so that he can be a special agent.
Maybe his attorneys win on this as a Free Speech issue. Maybe they don't.
But here's the reality for the FBI-ers taking the knee as it was for David.
You can't just fire people. You have to have cause. You have to document this and that.
Both cases should be fought that way.
The flag David displayed? Given to him by his supervisors. It had been displayed publicly and when they took it down, they gave it to David and he displayed it at his desk. And did so for years. No issue, no problem. Then Donald Chump gets sworn in and it's a problem.
You can't fire David because Chump doesn't like the Pride Flag. Now you could fire him for the flag if -- IF -- you changed the policy -- in writing -- and you informed David that the policy had changed. Had you done that and David was fired, it was no a Free Speech issue and only that. Does he have the right or not to display the flag.
But that's not what took place. What took place is Ka$h Patel acted on a whim and fired someone for doing something that had been with the FBI for years and now they were firing someone for doing what had been okay when no policy had been changed and he was given no warning.
You can't do that.
By the same token, the kneelers? They did what they did several years ago and several performance reviews ago. It was known then and it was not illegal and it was not considered unethical. They broke no rules. Years later, Ka$h and Donald don't like what happened long ago so they to punish the kneelers. They can't do that. They can't make a law or a policy in 2025 and try to retroactively apply it to five years ago.
The administration is breaking the law. Proving that in court -- all the way up to a Supreme Court appeal -- is enough of a win. For everyone who's gone public like David, that are hundreds who haven't. We need to fight when the administration thinks they're not bound by employment laws. That's a win for everyone.
I believe in Free Speech. But we're not there on these cases. This is wrongful termination and everyone involved could have their jobs back if attorneys weren't so quick to sneer at Labor Rights. Guess it's not sexy enough or doesn't pay enough money or doesn't get you the media coverage.
But most Americans in this country work or have worked. And Labor Rights are very important.
I decide to buy a Little Ceaser's (I'm hungry right now so we'll go with that for the example). I tell an employee who's been working there that he or she is fired today because five years ago they chewed gum on a shift. Their immediate response would be -- and should be -- that wasn't the rule five years ago. If we're not going to fight for Labor Rights, a lot of people are going to get fired until Chump leaves the White House.
Free Speech maters and, as Rachel Maddow noted last night, Joshua Aaron is suing the government over Free Speech due to APPLE dropping ICE BLOCK from the APPLE store under government pressure.
There is no right to fight Joshua's case except as a Free Speech case.
But there are other ways -- on stronger legal ground that requires no interpretation from Chump's idiotic appointees -- and then people like David -- who just wants his job back and to finish the last weeks of his training to be a special agent -- get what they want and need and Chump is delivered another blow.
What worker in this country is going to applaud Chump -- or any management -- for thinking you can change a policy and make the change retroactive to fire someone? No one. I would bet David's case and the kneelers could also be part of disparate-impact discrimination. They'd need to compile evidence to make that case -- others had political signs besides David but only David lost his job or the kneelers were fired while another group had similar actions of political speech and they weren't fired.
Moving from that to MEIDASTOUCH NEWS. Ben's first YOUTUBE posting of the day is always interesting and informative. But today even more than usual.
There are so many things in that video. Including that despite the steroid use (abuse) on the part of Robert Kennedy Jr., he still can't do a pull up. Not once in those multiple trials does his chin come above the bar -- he doesn't even get his eyes above the bar. But what I want to focus on is the uselessness of Melanie Trump. Even Barbara Bush had literacy. Melanie has nothing. I agree that clothing and exercise is not the business of the Secretary of Transportation.
But now I get it. Like me, Sean Duffy is worried how America will get through four years without a First Lady? So he's decided to take the soft causes like what to wear in flight and how to burn off a few calories before tackling that in-flight meal. If he can't be the First Lady, Sean's bound and determined to be The First Trophy Wife. He has the determination and now he ha the attitude of "Someone's got to do it so why not me!"
I think it's the sweetest thing in the world and as long as he stays away from busy dress patterns, I'm sure he'll do quite well in his new position.
Much better than Junior who made three attempts at a chin and, despite encouragement from observers, didn't complete one.
Donald
Trump’s approval rating is sinking again, and one columnist says the
crash that follows will be more than just another bad poll for a deeply
unpopular president. He thinks it will mark the unraveling of what he
calls “one of the greatest and most destructive cons in American
history.”
In a USA Today column, writer Rex Huppke argues
that Trump’s second term is entering a final phase, with voters
increasingly fed up and the president more interested in side projects
than governing.
This fall,
Huppke writes, is “going to be spectacular” as Trump remains
“horrendously unpopular and [a] swiftly deteriorating lame duck focused
more on building a glitzy ballroom or possibly invading Venezuela than
on making life better for Americans.” He frames Trump’s grip on his
supporters as a long running deception that is finally running into a
wall of reality.
The latest Gallup survey helps
explain the tone. According to the most recent numbers, Trump’s
approval rating stands at 36 percent, with 60 percent disapproving, a
new low of his second term. That kind of 20 point gap is the kind of
political air pocket that usually sets off panic in any White House,
especially one already staring down a tough midterm map.
A
series of scandals and policy controversies tied to Republicans and
President Donald Trump have kept the party in the headlines and hurt its
standing with voters.
House
Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) and Senate Majority Leader John Thune
(R-SD) have held the conference together, yet approval among Republican
voters has fallen from 53 percent to 23 percent.
Do you think the Republicans currently fleeing Congress and the ones that will lose in the upcoming mid-terms knew this time last year that they were signing a suicide pact?
With ICE alone -- and it's not the only crime of the administration -- Chump has done real damage for the GOP. This could result in serious setbacks for the party for decades to come. Which idiot said, as they approached the cliff, "Don't worry, we'll be fine." And, as they now begin falling from the cliff, which idiot is still saying, "Don't worry, we'll be fine."
Whispers continue that Chump's about to send Kristi Noem packing from her post as H*A*R*L*O*T of Homeland Security and that an announcement is imminent where she declares she's stepping down to spend less time with her family and more time hunting dogs. But for now, at least, she remains in charge of the agency that has harmed America's name more than anyone except Chump himself.
The
Trump administration has been sued over claims federal agents harmed
low-income seniors, veterans, and families by firing chemical agents
near an apartment building as part of an attempt by Department of
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to impress conservative
influencers.
Since
the summer, the use of force by Immigration and Customs Enforcement
agents has escalated around a federal facility in Portland, Oregon, with
the deployment of tear gas, pepper balls, and chaotic tactics that even
hit peaceful crowds. A new lawsuit alleges that their use has affected
residents living near the facility.
The
complaint, filed Dec. 5 by REACH Community Development and nine
residents of Gray’s Landing in Portland, Oregon, argues that, for the
past six months, federal agents have “indiscriminately deploy[ed tear
gas], smoke grenades, pepper balls, and other chemical agents in mass
volume,” with fumes that “seep through windows and vents, accumulate in
hallways and bedrooms, and bind to walls, carpets, clothing, furniture,
and children’s toys.”
It details yellow gas clouds, persistent coughs, burning eyes and throats, dizziness, and headaches.
Some
deployments were “not to address any real danger,” according to the
complaint, but to ”put on a show for conservative ‘influencers’” who had
been invited by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and DHS to the
ICE facility “to film the protests for propaganda purposes.”
They
have included Benny Johnson, a pro-Trump social media personality from
Florida, with 4 million X followers, and Trump ally Nick Sortor, who
were mocked in October after filming Noem on the roof of the facility
looking down at what Johnson called an “army of antifa,” but was
actually just two small groups of peaceful protesters—and a man in a
chicken suit.
A U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement (ICE) official is under arrest and held on an order of “no
bond” at the request of Hamilton County prosecutors, according to a
prosecutor’s office spokesperson.
Samuel
Saxon, 47, of Cincinnati, is accused of putting a female household
member in a “chokehold” and “causing serious physical harm,” court
records show.
Cincinnati police arrested Saxon over the weekend on charges of felonious assault, strangulation and domestic violence.
That is the true face of ICE -- as violent in the home as they are on the streets. What a proud moment for Noem and Chump. This is caliber of the average ICE agent. Too stupid to get another job. Grasp that the test is now open book. Their recruits were too stupid to pass a test so they made the test open book. And guess what? Even after doing that, over half their recruits still weren't able to pass.
The
Brazilian-born mother of White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt’s
nephew – who was recently detained by US immigration authorities – has
rejected the Trump administration’s characterizations of her as an
absentee parent.
Bruna Ferreira, who was
detained by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in November
during a traffic stop in Massachusetts and was being held at a Louisiana
detention center, said in an interview with the Washington Post that
the White House’s statements that she had never lived with her son or
spoken with Leavitt “in many years” were incorrect.
Ferreira,
33, had a relationship with Leavitt’s brother, 35-year-old Michael
Leavitt. They had a son, Michael Leavitt Jr, now aged 11.
She
said she was offended by the White House’s characterizations, calling
them “disgusting”. She said she takes her son to Dave & Buster’s, a
food and video games chain; ferries him to school, cheers at sports
games; and fills his bedroom with “everything a young boy needs”.
Ferreira
told the Post that she also “moved mountains” to ensure her son could
attend Karoline Leavitt’s wedding to real estate developer Nicholas
Riccio in early January. Ferreira also said she approved her son to
attend the White House Easter egg hunt in the spring.
I
believe Bruna. I believe her for two reasons. Karoline is a known
liar and the story as originally reported by the press. It broke about
ten minutes into the snapshot I was dictating November 26th. I knew about it because
one of the outlets noted in that snapshot called -- a friend with them
called. And I stopped dictating to take the call, while on the phone I
was scrolling through other coverage and was asking questions --
including 'it's the mother of Karoline's nephew. Why doesn't it say
that instead of this garbled description?" Karoline can play dumb but
she was involved in massaging that story to the press. That woman was
badly mistreated and I wouldn't be at all surprised if a Congressional
investigation revealed that Karoline's brother did order his ex picked
up. Bruna does not have a pattern of lying. Karoline cannot say the
same. And we all know that the original claims were false -- those came
from Karoline -- that Bruna had little to do with her own son, blah
blah blah. Karoline probably thought that, in all her Whiteness, she
could say whatever she wanted about Bruna and get away with it.
It's
not that easy, Karoline. And it won't be that easy for your nephew who,
as he grows older, will always remember that Karoline tried to have his
mother ripped out of his life. I hope he shows Karoline all the
kindness she showed him (none) when she tried to get his mother kicked
out of the country.
The
White House had said in a statement that Ferreira had not spoken to
Karoline Leavitt in years and that Ferreira had never lived with her
son. Trump administration officials have not responded to requests for
supporting documentation for the accusations about Ferreira.
Court
records, family photos and news accounts show that Ferreira lived with
her son and shared custody of him with Michael Leavitt. In a recent
interview with The Washington Post, Ferreira said she had chosen
Karoline Leavitt to be the child’s godmother. Ferreira arrived in the
United States when she was 6 years old.
Criminals is not the focus, quotas are. And so they will go after anyone they think they can deport easily -- criminal background or not. For example, Billal Rahman (WASHINGTON POST) reports:
A
65-year-old Jamaican-born U.S. Army veteran is reportedly facing
deportation after being detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement
(ICE) in Georgia.
Godfrey Wade, a longtime U.S.
resident, was taken into custody following a September 2025 traffic
stop for driving without a valid license, according to KENS5.
Newsweek has contacted the family and the Department of Homeland Security for comment.
President
Donald Trump has pledged to launch the largest mass deportation
operation in U.S. history, and his administration has ramped up
immigration arrests and removals.
Following
the traffic stop, local authorities referred him to ICE, which
transferred him to the Stewart Detention Center in Lumpkin, Georgia, a
CoreCivic-operated immigration jail that has faced years of scrutiny
over conditions.
“The Stewart Detention Center
is overcrowded and our dad has been denied a bed for weeks,” the family
wrote in a post on GoFundMe.
When
I interviewed Sanho Tree, I wanted to discuss a recent CNN report.
Apparently, in 2016, when Pete Hegseth was still a Fox anchor, he said
military personnel should refuse to obey unlawful orders.
I
wanted to talk to Tree, who is a fellow at the Institute for Policy
Studies, about the hypocrisy of saying one thing when the president is
Barack Obama and another when the president is Donald Trump.
That’s mostly what we discussed (see below) – until the last question.
That’s
when Tree characterized the September boat bombing as a much bigger
deal. “I think this policy of murdering civilians goes much deeper in
this administration. … This was a conspiracy to commit murder and that's
how it should be investigated,” Tree told me.
I’m putting up front this concept of a conspiracy to commit murder, because of what the Post reported today
– details from a meeting in October between congressional leaders and
military officials on the killing of suspected drug runners in the
Caribbean near Venezuela.
Evidently, the
Pentagon did not send any lawyers to explain the legal basis for the
boat attacks. (There have been nearly 20 since the first one on
September 2.) The Department of Defense could not explain the mission’s
“strategy or scope.” Leading Republicans complained about receiving more
transparency from the Biden administration. Alabama Congressman Mike
Rogers, who is chair of the House Armed Services Committee, was critical
of the Pentagon’s “secrecy.”
Dan Abrms reviews the statements and claims and notes "This is nuts" in the analysis below.
Heroes still walks among us, the new Vote Vets ad notes, so do cowards and fools.
Isn't tomorrow the day Pete's supposed to learn if they can prosecute Senator Mark Kelly for free speech? For reminding the country of the actual law? The next 24 hours must be a very nervous period for Pete now that multiple videos from 2016 have emerged of Pete saying, when Barack Obama was president, on FOX "NEWS," that troops are legally barred from following illegal orders. Pete didn't think about that when he was attacking Senator Mark Kelly's character with one lie after another.
I'm calling out David E. Sanger and hadn't planned to. Saw he was covering Chump's change on releasing the video and thought it would be a solid text inclusion. It's not. From his NYT writing:
Days after President Trump declared he had “no problem” releasing a video of a second strike
on a boat in the Caribbean on Sept. 2 that killed two alleged drug
smugglers hanging to remnants of the hull, he reversed himself on Monday
and said he would let Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth decide whether to
make it public.
The video was shown to
a few members of Congress last week, in the Pentagon’s first effort to
tamp down intense criticism, some from Republicans, of the decision to
attack the boat again. Some members of Congress have said that if the
follow-on strike was intended to kill the remaining two survivors of the
crew of about 11, it could be a war crime as well as a violation of the
U.S. military’s own code of conduct.
Democrats
who emerged from a showing of the video described it showing the two
men clinging to wreckage to avoid drowning, and that the images were
shocking and would repulse the public. Representative Jim Himes of
Connecticut, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said
on CBS’s “Face the Nation” on Sunday that the two survivors “were barely
alive, much less engaging in hostilities,” when the follow-up strike
took place.
Mr. Trump told reporters
who asked about the video last week, “I don’t know what they have, but
whatever they have, we’d certainly release, no problem.”
But on Monday he denied ever endorsing its release and referred the issue to Mr. Hegseth.
We spent years covering David E. Sanger in the past. I'm not a legacy artist, I don't do greatest hits. We're focused on the now. But we're having to note what a pathetic piece of writing this is. If you don't get it, go stream Ben's video above. Because David's offering the mildest version of what took place Monday.
I'm embarrassed for David. He's damn lucky that we're winding down or he would be the entire focus of this snapshot.
Go watch that video again. Ben provides it for you -- actual video of Chump raging and telling the female reporter that she's a liar and that he never said he would release the video and that she's lyin gand . . .
David E. Sanger, you owe your peers an apology. A journalist stood in the Oval Office and quoted back to Chump what he said, what he's on video and film saying, and he attacked her.
Yet when you write up what happened, not only do you not defend your fellow jouranlist, you don't even report to the readers that Chump attacked her. That Chump lied and attacked her.
You really need to find a new profession. If you can't even defend journalism, you have no place being a journalist. I'm going to stop now before I say anything else.
Let's note this from Senator Patty Murray's office:
SEATTLE TIMES: WA health insurance buyers fret as ACA subsidies remain in limbo
NEW YORK TIMES: Running Out of Time, Republicans in Congress Still Lack a Health Plan
Senator Murray has been sounding
the alarm on the looming health care cost cliff and calling on
Republicans to work with Democrats to extend the ACA tax credits well
over a year—FULL TIMELINE HERE
Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray
(D-WA), a senior member and former chair of the Senate Health,
Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee, held a virtual press
conference on the fight to save the Affordable Care Act (ACA) enhanced premium tax credits ahead of the critical vote
this week on a proposal to extend the tax credits for three years.
Joining Senator Murray for the press conference were Ingrid Ulrey, CEO
of the Washington State Health Benefit Exchange, and Lisa, a Washington
resident of King County who buys her health care through the Marketplace
and is facing skyrocketing premiums with the looming expiration of the
ACA enhanced premium tax credits.
At the press conference, Senator Murray discussed how inaction by
Republican Members of Congress will force Washingtonians to pay
significantly more for health care next year, and how this week’s vote
on a clean, three-year extension of the ACA tax credits is the last
chance to prevent skyrocketing health care premiums starting in January,
when the tax credits expire. Due to Republicans’ refusal to extend the
ACA enhanced premium tax credits, 22 million Americans—including over 216,000 in Washington state—are seeing their health care costs for next year skyrocket. Premiums are more than doubling on average for people who buy health coverage on the ACA Marketplace (Washington Healthplanfinder in Washington state), and these higher costs will push 4.8 million
people off their health insurance coverage over the next decade. A
Washington-state specific fact sheet on the ACA enhanced premium tax
credits is HERE.
“I’ve heard from families across the country who are staring
down unthinkable health care hikes. Premiums doubling, tripling, and
worse. I am talking to people who learned their monthly premium is
jumping by hundreds—in some cases thousands—of dollars a month.
Americans who are making painful decisions wondering how they can cut
down on groceries, gas, and other essentials to cover their rising
premiums, or whether they will just roll the dice and go without
coverage, even if it means skipping checkups or rationing their
prescriptions,” said Senator Murray. “These stories are
so important to drive home the reality for Republicans who keep trying
to bury their heads in the sand. This is not some talking point. It is
not some thought exercise. The MAGA health care hike is a reality that
millions of families are facing in this country right now. And unless we
take action—decisive, quick action this week—to stop it, higher premium
costs for millions of American families will be getting locked in for
good.”
Senator Murray played a critical role in passing the ACA enhanced premium tax credits into law in the American Rescue Plan Act in 2021 and extending them in the Inflation Reduction Act in
2022. Since then, she has called on Republicans to extend the enhanced
premium tax credits dozens of times, calling attention to the tax credit
cliff and how millions of Americans will see their health care costs
jump dramatically if Republicans don’t work with Democrats on an
extension.
Senator Murray has been speakingoutnonstop about
the urgent need to save the ACA tax credits and stop health care costs
from skyrocketing and calling on Republicans to come to the negotiating
table to work out a bipartisan deal to extend the tax credits—which they
have so far refused to do. She has spoken on the Senate floor numeroustimes to call for an extension of the ACA tax credits, and has held numerous virtualpressconferences with Washingtonians, as well as residents of neighboring states Idaho and Montana,
to sound the alarm and highlight the stakes of the health care fight.
As the top Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee, Senator
Murray led legislation supported
by the Democratic caucus that would have addressed the health care
crisis and prevented the government shutdown. Senator Murray has also
cosponsored multiple pieces of legislation over the past year—the Health Care Affordability Actand the Protecting Health Care and Lowering Costs Act—that would make the ACA tax credits permanent.
“Open enrollment is really tough right now. People, as you
said, are experiencing sticker shock. And I really want to emphasize
what you said about a clean extension—we’re overdue, we need this to
happen. Literally, our customers are suffering and experiencing so much
worry and anxiety about how they’re going to afford something so basic
and meaningful and important as health insurance. As you said, we need a
clean extension, that’s important. That means extending the existing
policy as is, not changing into some other kind of policy, because we
want to act quickly to pass on relief to our customers as soon as
possible,” saidIngrid Ulrey, CEO of the Washington State Health Benefit Exchange.
“Our average customer coming in who will no longer be eligible in that
income bracket, the increase will be up to $800 a month, is what they’ll
be seeing versus last year, a policy that cost $450 a month. And that’s
just the average. Many people are experiencing tens of thousands of
dollar increases. So overall [they are] thinking about what kind of
choices am I going to make? How am I going to afford to pay for health
insurance at $10,000, $20,000, or even $30,000 a year?”
“When I went on Washington Healthplanfinder to get insurance
for 2026, I found that the premium for continuing my current plan is now
over $1,600 a month. That is an increase of nearly $9,000 for the
calendar year – all to continue the same coverage with no increase in my
health care needs. As a person living on a fixed retirement income, I
do not have that extra money… I have been planning for my retirement for
30 years. I have been responsible with my spending. I waited to retire
until I had savings and retirement income that allowed me to be
self-sufficient and also pay for some modest recreation, travel and
occasional gestures for my adult children. That’s now gone,” said Lisa Riveland, a resident of King County, Washington. “In
the past year, my fixed income has already been stretched by
skyrocketing prices for food, housing and basic services. Now the loss
of the health care tax credit, and accompanying increased healthcare
premium rates, has tipped my carefully planned budget on its head. This
is my story. I expect every member of Congress is hearing similar
stories. I hope these stories will translate to immediate action in
Congress to secure affordable health care.”
A timeline detailing how Senator Murray has been fighting
for years to extend the ACA tax credits, and calling on Republicans to
come to the table and negotiate, is HERE.
Senator Murray’s remarks, as delivered on today’s press call, are below:
“Thank you all for joining me as we keep the spotlight on the MAGA
health care hike, and give Republicans one last chance to join us and
stop these premiums from skyrocketing across the country.
“I have been raising the alarm about this all year long, and
Republicans have been trying to ignore it all year long. Literally, they
chose to shut down the government rather than even talk with us about
health care.
“Still, just because Republicans don’t want to talk about something,
that’s never going to stop me from talking to my constituents about it,
and lifting up their stories and concerns loud and clear in the other
Washington.
“And I will tell you—I have heard so many heartbreaking stories from
so many concerned families when it comes to skyrocketing health care
costs. I’ve heard from families across the country who are staring down
unthinkable health care hikes. Premiums doubling, tripling, worse. I am
talking to people who learned their monthly premium is jumping by
hundreds, and in some cases thousands—of dollars a month.
“Americans who are making painful decisions wondering how they can
cut down on groceries, gas, and other essentials to cover their rising
premiums, or whether they will just roll the dice and go without
coverage, even if it means skipping checkups or rationing prescriptions.
“Later on this call, Lisa from Washington state is going to share her
story and talk about the health care price hike she’s facing next year
because of this Republican inaction.
“These stories are so important to drive home the reality for
Republicans who keep trying to bury their heads in the sand. This is not
some talking point. It is not some thought exercise. The MAGA health
care hike is a reality that millions of families are facing in this
county right now.
“And unless we take action—decisive, quick action this week—to stop
it, higher premium costs for millions of American families will be
getting locked in for good.
“So, time is of the absolute essence right now. The fact of the
matter is, this should have been happening months ago. We should not be
having this conversation in the middle of December. If Republicans
wanted to make reforms to the tax credits, the time for that was before
open enrollment.
“But right now, the only thing we have time for is a clean extension
of the tax credits—which is exactly what Democrats will be forcing a
vote on this week.
“We need to stop the health care hike right now, and we need to save
health care for the tens of millions of American families who are
counting on us. We are way past the deadline—we are in overtime.
“Republicans need to understand that it’s literally now or never for
stopping these premium hikes families are facing next year. And by
refusing a clean extension and running out the clock, Republicans are
choosing: the never.
“But I’m not going to stop pushing. I am not going to stop sharing
families’ stories, and keeping up the pressure. So long as there is even
a chance we can stop premiums from skyrocketing, and save millions of
patients from getting priced out of their health coverage. I am going to
push with everything I’ve got to make sure we get it done.
“And if Republicans refuse to do the right thing, the obvious thing,
the thing their own constituents are begging us to do, if they refuse to
stop this MAGA health care hike, well, our fight doesn’t end at the end
of this year.
“I am going to continue sharing these stories. I am going to continue
holding Republicans accountable. And more importantly, the American
people are going to hold Republicans accountable too—with their voices
and their votes.
“And listen, looking past this fight to save the ACA tax credits,
which is so crucial, we still need universal health care in America. We
have needed that for a very long time. It’s always what I’ve fought for.
So I am going to keep pushing for reforms that make high-quality health
care—that’s actually affordable—a reality for every American.
“And now, I’ll turn it over to Ingrid, CEO of the Washington Health Benefit Exchange to share some remarks.”