Thought I was done but went back to the e-mail and Keesha sent two articles.
For all the people who said they went to the site asking Kerry to join the recounts, here's this from The Washington Post:
Sen. John F. Kerry's presidential campaign asked an Ohio judge yesterday to allow it to join a legal fight there over whether election officials in one county may sit out the state's impending recount.
[. . . ]
Lawyers for the Kerry campaign asked to join Green Party presidential candidate David Cobb, Libertarian candidate Michael Badnarik and the National Voting Rights Institute in the fight to force the county to participate in the recount. "If there's going to be a recount in Ohio, we don't want it to exclude Delaware County or any other county that might decide to follow Delaware County's lead," Kerry lawyer Dan Hoffheimer said. "It should be a full, fair and accurate recount."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A23344-2004Nov30.html
From The New York Daily News (click link for the full article):
Voter fraud in the Ukraine? Give me a break.
It has been a month now and we still don't have a clear count of the votes for our own presidential race from the state of Ohio.
For those who may have forgotten, Ohio supposedly assured George W. Bush a second term in the White House - only the most important job on the planet.
The morning after the election, we were told Bush was ahead of John Kerry in that state's unofficial count by 139,000 votes, or 2.5%.
At the time there were 155,000 uncounted provisional ballots and an unknown number of overseas ballots, but Kerry concluded they would not produce enough of a margin to erase his deficit, so he promptly conceded.
At the same time, given the bitter Democratic memories of the 2000 Florida fiasco, he assured his supporters he would fight to have every vote properly counted this time.
Within a few days, other problems began to show up in Ohio's preliminary tally.
We learned, for example, that an additional 93,000 voters had gone to the polls yet machines had registered no preference of theirs for President. Only a manual recount can tell us for sure what happened to those 93,000 ballots.
Then, red-faced election officials in Franklin County admitted a computer error on Election Night had tallied 4,258 votes for Bush in a precinct where only 638 people voted. That correction alone will drop Bush's margin by 3,620.
And now Daily News reporter Larry Cohler-Esses and I have uncovered some more unusual vote totals, this time in black neighborhoods of Cleveland. Those results are from the precinct-by-precinct tallies released by the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections, where Cleveland is located.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/col/jgonzalez/
Democracy Now! viewers are familiar with Juan Gonzales. Whether you watch him on DN! or not, there is an e-mail address on his column if you'd like to drop him a note to thank him for covering this when the majority seem completely uninterested in the story. (If you've already read the article and are in a rush to send him a thank you note for drawing attention to this issue, his e-mail is jgonzalez@ edit.nydailynews.com.)
If you'd like to see some TV coverage on this, why not use New York Daily News' e-mail function to send the article to The Today Show? Maybe that would help broadcast TV find this story?
Today's picked at random. It's the number one rated daytime "news" show. (I did watch Today regularly as I got ready each morning until I gave up on it and all other TV "news.") Their e-mail address is today@nbc.com and possibly if enough people sent them this story, they might notice it?
[Thanks to the attention Buzzflash has given the Ohio issue since the election, I'm aware that Keith Olberman is covering this issue on his MSNBC show. I'll try to find his blog tomorrow and post it though I'm sure most of you already know where to go to check it out.]
Wednesday, December 01, 2004
Judith Miller, caesarian, Ohio, Jesse Jackson & Lizz Winstead
As the day passed, more e-mails came in. It appears a lot of you watched The Charlie Rose Show last night to catch Judith Miller.
Dave may have summed it up for those who tuned in: "I was just wanting to see if somehow she could find a way to justify covering up a crime. She didn't. She wants to put out everything but that. 'Poor put on Judy.'"
The latter sentiment was shared by Arlene who wrote, "As she tried to play up the vulnerability factor, I found myself humming 'Poor, Poor, Pitiful Me.' And wondering who sold her on that haircut?"
Eric said, "Disgusting! Seeing Richard Cohen yucking it up as though this was Tonight Show and Judith Miller was Pammy Anderson explaining her latest breakup! Disgusting!"
Alice who says to put in that she's 66 years old wants to add this on Cohen, "I've always had a soft spot for Richard. But he needed to trim his beard. When he was laughing about 'no exemption' for [Robert] Novak I felt like he had no grasp of how serious this was. I think he's spent too much time around [David] Broder."
Frank in Orlando felt that, "Judy came off sexy, smart and standing up for all of us! She said it. It's hard to do her job! Why won't people let up?"
Janeane feels people do not need to let up, "Pretzel logic! Pretzel logic! Pretzel logic! She's twisted the truth and events for so long that she's practicing Ashtanga journalism in a fantasy world far, far, far removed from reality."
Gore Vidal Is God says, "I didn't think there could be something more sickening than Judy Miller but Charlie Rose provided it. 'Sweet Judy Miller.' He was fawning, cooing and doing everything but journalism. It was Pat O'Brian nodding sympathetically as Elizabeth Berkley whined no one takes her seriously as a dramatic actress."
Davy found it "hard to believe" as well and added, "So now No Truth Judith has discovered some knowledge about the profession she's been malpracticing for years? Let's break it down for little Judy because journalism is so far beyond her understanding. When someone breaks the law and you're writing a story about it, you may have a First Amendment right to withhold the story. If you're interviewing a woman about how she home schools her child and over coffee she says, 'By the way, I'm killing my husband tomorrow' you've got no First Amendment protection."
Someone who wants to be billed only as Professional Journalist was thinking about First Amendment rights as well, "Every time we have a solid reason to protect a source, we need to go to the mat for the principal. When people like Judith Miller or Mark Bowden start confusing journalistic principles with their personal right of refusal, they set us all back and erode the protections that our profession is supposed to have. In the hostile court climate of the last decade, why Miller's willing to risk the protection journalists have fought long and hard for in order to avoid answering a question that she probably knows she should answer is not something I'm comfortable speculating about. But I do know that if she loses in court, we all suffer. Being a source on one or several stories does not give you blanket immunity. Miller's confusing her relationship with the source with that of a psychiatrist and a patient. If she continues to attempt to hide behind the First Amendment, we will all suffer."
Suffer is what Matt felt he was doing as he watched The Charlie Rose Show, "Tough as nails Judith Miller, Sure of herself Judith Miller and all her other annoying contexts were not in evidence. Instead, she tried to play sweet, innocent and standing up for truth-justice. Let's put aside that Miller hasn't been in the truth business for years, is anyone buying her as Brave, little Judy? I'm not. But it was quite a performance. She was all but hugging herself on air."
"You like me, you really like me!" wrote Rolanda. "It was as though she was attempting to come off like Sally Field! Gidget Goes To Work For The Times! Playing now to nauseated audiences everywhere!"
Brandon also felt Miller was trying to come off like Sally Field and "I wasn't buying it. She must think we're all a bunch of rubes who've forgotten that she pounded the drums to lead us into war and now wants to act as though she's been fighting for journalistic integrity her entire career."
Trevor felt we should remember, "It's hard work. How do I know that? She told us and Judes Miller never lies, right? She has all these things she wants to do but she's having a hard time concentrating and may only get two things on her to do list checked off by December. Lucky us, maybe war with Iran will wait another year."
"When The New York Times loses this case," Liang began, "they'll have only themselves to blame. They should have cut her loose when all her Iraq stories unraveled. Reading her bashing of the UN stories I get the feeling she's still using the same questionable sources. The paper has brought this on themselves."
Geneva wrote in with some tips for Miller, "1) Drop the innocent victim act, no one's going to buy it. 2) Quit acting as though you're the one being hurt. You haven't been hurt. 3) If a principal means anything you suck it up and take it. 4) Don't equate your difficulty in writing current articles with the difficulties that were created for Valerie Plame. 5) Valerie Plame is the victim here. 6) Lose the bangs, you're too old to pull them off."
Valerie Plame was mentioned a great deal in the e-mails. Ralph wondered, "What world is he [Richard Cohen] living in that he actually thinks the majority of the reporting has focused on Valerie Plame? There hasn't been a majority of reporting. The only reason the outing of Plame has finally gotten attention is because the press has turned this into a story about themselves.
B___, moan and whine all you want, you're lives haven't been destroyed, your cover hasn't been blown. Here's a tip for that guy [Cohen] and Miller, it isn't always about you. Everything that happens in the world isn't about you. I didn't hear one person seriously address the issue of what was done to Plame and what it means for her and anyone she had public contact with and that's the issue. They're all suspect now, from the waiter who took her order to the person she walked down the street with. Their lives are destroyed. You are all overpaid performers passing yourself off as brave truth tellers. You should all be ashamed that Plame was outed and that you are yet again making it all about you."
Tim says, "Taking a page from Thoroughly Modern Cheney, I recast as I watched. Charlie Rose was Robert Wagner, Richard Cohen was Dom DeLuise, Floyd Abrams was the dad on Everybody Loves Raymond [Peter Boyle], Zachary Carter was Tim Reid, and Judy Miller was Joey Heatheron. As the attempted touching story on a really bad Love Boat, I could almost watch this ____!"
Finally, Rachel wrote, "Hey Jude, the movement you need is on your shoulder -- wait! That's a chip on your shoulder, Judy, not a movement. Never mind."
On the subject of the Times caesarian story, "Trying to Avoid 2nd caesarian Many Find Choice Isn't Theirs" by Denise Grady (http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/29/health/29birth.html), that ran Monday, thirty of you wrote in. Susan, a midwife in Vermont, says she was stunned reading this article, "I kept waiting to come across some new information, some new study that justified this change. There wasn't any. If doctors and hospitals don't want to perform natural child birth with a woman who has previously had a caesarian, the choice of home birthing will only become more popular." Robyn wonders, "Why does it seem like the hospital's nervousness and the doctor's schedule were the issues but the choice of the mother wasn't even factored in?"
"This was useful information," Kim felt. "I was led to believe I had no choice with my first birth and that I had to have a c-section. My husband and I are planning a bigger family and you can be sure I'll now be twice as suspicious when dealing with any doctor."
Marie questioned the estimates: "Let me see if I have this right, and correct me if I'm wrong, but ten years ago there was thought to be a 1 in 200 chance of a c-section scar rupturing and now it may or may not have increased to 1 in 100 but there's no data on injury to the child? Trust me, if there was a study that showed even that slight increase, there would be data on infant injuries. This isn't about a safer delivery, it's about a quicker one for doctors."
This morning three e-mails came in asking where the rally in Ohio will be Saturday. Thanks to www.buzzflash.com I can answer pass on some information. The rally is this Saturday, December 4th, one p.m. at the Ohio Statehouse in Columbus, Ohio. You can find more information on this at http://www.uacitizensforchange.com/rally/.
I also want to link to Jesse Jackson's op-ed in Tuesday's Chicago Sun-Times, "Something's Fishy In Ohio" http://www.suntimes.com/output/jesse/cst-edt-jesse30.html. Here's the opening paragraph:
In the Ukraine, citizens are in the streets protesting what they charge is a fixed election. U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell expresses this nation's concern about apparent voting irregularities. The media give the dispute around-the-clock coverage. But in the United States, massive and systemic voter irregularities go unreported and unnoticed.
For those who asked about Lizz Winstead's Tom Ridge "tribute" done on Unfiltered this morning, here's a sample. Please note, you really have to hear her delivery to truly enjoy the humor. They also used "Thanks for the Memory" as the theme music for this segment. The ". . . ." indicate an edited line, not Lizz's pauses. Edited to comply with fair use, not due to language.
In honor of Tom Ridge's resignation, here's Lizz's "Tribute":
Remember when Tom Ridge said, "Beware of people dressed like fireman?" To this day, no one has ever actually been attacked by a terrorist fireman. . . . Remember Ridge's frequent but vague public warnings about possible terrorists activities like floating cooler bombs on the fourth of July? Or the exploding Valentine's day Teddy bear alert? Not a single teddy bear blew up and harmed a single American child. Remember when Ridge warned us that several financial landmarks in New York and New Jersey were being cased for an attack? But they weren't. At least not in the last few years. Oh and who could forget in May when he warned Al Qaeda had entered an operational period world wide? Ridge instinctively knew Al Qaeda's vacation schedule. . . . And last but not least, thanks to Tom Ridge children across the nation will always associate the color red with bad; and orange with almost bad; and the color yellow with consistent underlying doom. So thanks Tom Ridge for ruining the crayola system for our many, many children. They're now afraid of the simple colors we all used to enjoy. So in the words of Homeland Secretary Tom Ridge, "Mr. President, I hereby resign my post."
Unfiltered airs on Air America Radio (http://www.airamericaradio.com/) and is hosted by Lizz Winstead, Rachel Maddow and Chuck D. The Tom Ridge "Tribute" can be heard on the December 1st show and you can find the Unfiltered archive here http://airamericaplace.com/archive.php?mode=show&id=4 at Air America Place.
Dave may have summed it up for those who tuned in: "I was just wanting to see if somehow she could find a way to justify covering up a crime. She didn't. She wants to put out everything but that. 'Poor put on Judy.'"
The latter sentiment was shared by Arlene who wrote, "As she tried to play up the vulnerability factor, I found myself humming 'Poor, Poor, Pitiful Me.' And wondering who sold her on that haircut?"
Eric said, "Disgusting! Seeing Richard Cohen yucking it up as though this was Tonight Show and Judith Miller was Pammy Anderson explaining her latest breakup! Disgusting!"
Alice who says to put in that she's 66 years old wants to add this on Cohen, "I've always had a soft spot for Richard. But he needed to trim his beard. When he was laughing about 'no exemption' for [Robert] Novak I felt like he had no grasp of how serious this was. I think he's spent too much time around [David] Broder."
Frank in Orlando felt that, "Judy came off sexy, smart and standing up for all of us! She said it. It's hard to do her job! Why won't people let up?"
Janeane feels people do not need to let up, "Pretzel logic! Pretzel logic! Pretzel logic! She's twisted the truth and events for so long that she's practicing Ashtanga journalism in a fantasy world far, far, far removed from reality."
Gore Vidal Is God says, "I didn't think there could be something more sickening than Judy Miller but Charlie Rose provided it. 'Sweet Judy Miller.' He was fawning, cooing and doing everything but journalism. It was Pat O'Brian nodding sympathetically as Elizabeth Berkley whined no one takes her seriously as a dramatic actress."
Davy found it "hard to believe" as well and added, "So now No Truth Judith has discovered some knowledge about the profession she's been malpracticing for years? Let's break it down for little Judy because journalism is so far beyond her understanding. When someone breaks the law and you're writing a story about it, you may have a First Amendment right to withhold the story. If you're interviewing a woman about how she home schools her child and over coffee she says, 'By the way, I'm killing my husband tomorrow' you've got no First Amendment protection."
Someone who wants to be billed only as Professional Journalist was thinking about First Amendment rights as well, "Every time we have a solid reason to protect a source, we need to go to the mat for the principal. When people like Judith Miller or Mark Bowden start confusing journalistic principles with their personal right of refusal, they set us all back and erode the protections that our profession is supposed to have. In the hostile court climate of the last decade, why Miller's willing to risk the protection journalists have fought long and hard for in order to avoid answering a question that she probably knows she should answer is not something I'm comfortable speculating about. But I do know that if she loses in court, we all suffer. Being a source on one or several stories does not give you blanket immunity. Miller's confusing her relationship with the source with that of a psychiatrist and a patient. If she continues to attempt to hide behind the First Amendment, we will all suffer."
Suffer is what Matt felt he was doing as he watched The Charlie Rose Show, "Tough as nails Judith Miller, Sure of herself Judith Miller and all her other annoying contexts were not in evidence. Instead, she tried to play sweet, innocent and standing up for truth-justice. Let's put aside that Miller hasn't been in the truth business for years, is anyone buying her as Brave, little Judy? I'm not. But it was quite a performance. She was all but hugging herself on air."
"You like me, you really like me!" wrote Rolanda. "It was as though she was attempting to come off like Sally Field! Gidget Goes To Work For The Times! Playing now to nauseated audiences everywhere!"
Brandon also felt Miller was trying to come off like Sally Field and "I wasn't buying it. She must think we're all a bunch of rubes who've forgotten that she pounded the drums to lead us into war and now wants to act as though she's been fighting for journalistic integrity her entire career."
Trevor felt we should remember, "It's hard work. How do I know that? She told us and Judes Miller never lies, right? She has all these things she wants to do but she's having a hard time concentrating and may only get two things on her to do list checked off by December. Lucky us, maybe war with Iran will wait another year."
"When The New York Times loses this case," Liang began, "they'll have only themselves to blame. They should have cut her loose when all her Iraq stories unraveled. Reading her bashing of the UN stories I get the feeling she's still using the same questionable sources. The paper has brought this on themselves."
Geneva wrote in with some tips for Miller, "1) Drop the innocent victim act, no one's going to buy it. 2) Quit acting as though you're the one being hurt. You haven't been hurt. 3) If a principal means anything you suck it up and take it. 4) Don't equate your difficulty in writing current articles with the difficulties that were created for Valerie Plame. 5) Valerie Plame is the victim here. 6) Lose the bangs, you're too old to pull them off."
Valerie Plame was mentioned a great deal in the e-mails. Ralph wondered, "What world is he [Richard Cohen] living in that he actually thinks the majority of the reporting has focused on Valerie Plame? There hasn't been a majority of reporting. The only reason the outing of Plame has finally gotten attention is because the press has turned this into a story about themselves.
B___, moan and whine all you want, you're lives haven't been destroyed, your cover hasn't been blown. Here's a tip for that guy [Cohen] and Miller, it isn't always about you. Everything that happens in the world isn't about you. I didn't hear one person seriously address the issue of what was done to Plame and what it means for her and anyone she had public contact with and that's the issue. They're all suspect now, from the waiter who took her order to the person she walked down the street with. Their lives are destroyed. You are all overpaid performers passing yourself off as brave truth tellers. You should all be ashamed that Plame was outed and that you are yet again making it all about you."
Tim says, "Taking a page from Thoroughly Modern Cheney, I recast as I watched. Charlie Rose was Robert Wagner, Richard Cohen was Dom DeLuise, Floyd Abrams was the dad on Everybody Loves Raymond [Peter Boyle], Zachary Carter was Tim Reid, and Judy Miller was Joey Heatheron. As the attempted touching story on a really bad Love Boat, I could almost watch this ____!"
Finally, Rachel wrote, "Hey Jude, the movement you need is on your shoulder -- wait! That's a chip on your shoulder, Judy, not a movement. Never mind."
On the subject of the Times caesarian story, "Trying to Avoid 2nd caesarian Many Find Choice Isn't Theirs" by Denise Grady (http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/29/health/29birth.html), that ran Monday, thirty of you wrote in. Susan, a midwife in Vermont, says she was stunned reading this article, "I kept waiting to come across some new information, some new study that justified this change. There wasn't any. If doctors and hospitals don't want to perform natural child birth with a woman who has previously had a caesarian, the choice of home birthing will only become more popular." Robyn wonders, "Why does it seem like the hospital's nervousness and the doctor's schedule were the issues but the choice of the mother wasn't even factored in?"
"This was useful information," Kim felt. "I was led to believe I had no choice with my first birth and that I had to have a c-section. My husband and I are planning a bigger family and you can be sure I'll now be twice as suspicious when dealing with any doctor."
Marie questioned the estimates: "Let me see if I have this right, and correct me if I'm wrong, but ten years ago there was thought to be a 1 in 200 chance of a c-section scar rupturing and now it may or may not have increased to 1 in 100 but there's no data on injury to the child? Trust me, if there was a study that showed even that slight increase, there would be data on infant injuries. This isn't about a safer delivery, it's about a quicker one for doctors."
This morning three e-mails came in asking where the rally in Ohio will be Saturday. Thanks to www.buzzflash.com I can answer pass on some information. The rally is this Saturday, December 4th, one p.m. at the Ohio Statehouse in Columbus, Ohio. You can find more information on this at http://www.uacitizensforchange.com/rally/.
I also want to link to Jesse Jackson's op-ed in Tuesday's Chicago Sun-Times, "Something's Fishy In Ohio" http://www.suntimes.com/output/jesse/cst-edt-jesse30.html. Here's the opening paragraph:
In the Ukraine, citizens are in the streets protesting what they charge is a fixed election. U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell expresses this nation's concern about apparent voting irregularities. The media give the dispute around-the-clock coverage. But in the United States, massive and systemic voter irregularities go unreported and unnoticed.
For those who asked about Lizz Winstead's Tom Ridge "tribute" done on Unfiltered this morning, here's a sample. Please note, you really have to hear her delivery to truly enjoy the humor. They also used "Thanks for the Memory" as the theme music for this segment. The ". . . ." indicate an edited line, not Lizz's pauses. Edited to comply with fair use, not due to language.
In honor of Tom Ridge's resignation, here's Lizz's "Tribute":
Remember when Tom Ridge said, "Beware of people dressed like fireman?" To this day, no one has ever actually been attacked by a terrorist fireman. . . . Remember Ridge's frequent but vague public warnings about possible terrorists activities like floating cooler bombs on the fourth of July? Or the exploding Valentine's day Teddy bear alert? Not a single teddy bear blew up and harmed a single American child. Remember when Ridge warned us that several financial landmarks in New York and New Jersey were being cased for an attack? But they weren't. At least not in the last few years. Oh and who could forget in May when he warned Al Qaeda had entered an operational period world wide? Ridge instinctively knew Al Qaeda's vacation schedule. . . . And last but not least, thanks to Tom Ridge children across the nation will always associate the color red with bad; and orange with almost bad; and the color yellow with consistent underlying doom. So thanks Tom Ridge for ruining the crayola system for our many, many children. They're now afraid of the simple colors we all used to enjoy. So in the words of Homeland Secretary Tom Ridge, "Mr. President, I hereby resign my post."
Unfiltered airs on Air America Radio (http://www.airamericaradio.com/) and is hosted by Lizz Winstead, Rachel Maddow and Chuck D. The Tom Ridge "Tribute" can be heard on the December 1st show and you can find the Unfiltered archive here http://airamericaplace.com/archive.php?mode=show&id=4 at Air America Place.
Falluja, UN and even another small AP item on domestic recounts in this morning's New York Times
Pretty strong edition of the New York Times today. Warren Hoge reports on some proposals for the UN in "U.N. Report Urges Big Changes; Security Council Would Expand." According to Hoge, among the things being considered are:
* upping the Security Council to 24 member
(including six additional permanent members, though the veto power with the current five: China, England, France, Russia & United States)
* six threats to international peace are named: "interstate conflict, civil war, economic and social threats, weapons of mass destruction, terrorism and organized international crime"
Robert F. Worth's "In Falluja's Ruins, Big Plans and a Risk of Chaos" opens strong and is well worth reading:
Standing in the rubble outside an empty medical clinic here, Dr. Basam Mohamed, dressed in a blue blazer and work boots, gazed out at the ruins of his native city. He had just heard a group of American civil affairs officers explain their plans to rebuild the clinic and install a huge water tank behind it until the water pipes - smashed by bombs - could be fixed.
But Dr. Mohamed, a Health Ministry official in the Iraqi interim government, had other worries. His parents are among the residents who fled Falluja just before the American military offensive here earlier this month, he said. They are eager to return but have no idea how badly the fighting damaged the city
"They will feel hard toward the Americans," Dr. Mohamed said with a wince, as his American guides led him off to look at another ruined clinic.
* more than 200 buildings destroyed
* power lines damaged to the point that the city's looking at ripping out everything and rebuilding "from scratch" (a job expected to take a minimum of six months)
* months needed for repairs "to the city's water and sewer pipes"
Big plans, thirty-five million dollars spending project, but we've been down that road before.
Again, worth reading.
Richard W. Stevenson & David Johnston write about Tom "Ridge, First Head of U.S. Security Is Qutting Post." Lizz Winstead did a very funny "tribute" to Ridge to the tune of "Thanks for the Memories" this morning on Unfiltered.
Eli Sanders writes "Washington Has a Governor, but the Race Goes On" ( http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/01/national/01gov.html). Refer to previous blog entry to get the site on the recount if you'd like to make a donation.
On A18 is another article worthy of mention which opens strongly:
An animal rights group released grisly undercover videotapes yesterday showing steers in a major kosher slaughterhouse in Iowa staggering and bellowing long after their throats were cut. The plant, run by AgriProcessors Inc. in Postville, Iowa, is being denounced as inhumane by the group, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, and by several experts on animal science and kosher practice.
But the plant's supervising rabbi said the tapes were "testimony that this is being done right." And representatives of the Orthodox Union, the leading organization that certifies kosher products, said that while the pictures were not pretty, they did not make the case that the slaughterhouse had violated kosher law.
To read more of Donald G. McNeil, Jr.'s "Videos Cited in Calling Kosher Slaughterhouse Inhumane" click http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/01/national/01kosher.html .
Neil A. Lewis' "Red Cross President Plans Visit to Washington on Question of Detainees' Treatment' notes that IRC head, M. Jakob Kellenberger, would like to visit D.C. and speak with administration officials.
The only recount news in the paper (other than the governor's race in Washington state) is an Associated Press article "Nevada Judge Dismisses Vote Fraud Case" which deals with Peter Breen of Washoe County District Court tossing "out a legal challenge inteded to block Nevada's five electoral votes" from going to Bush. Doesn't it seem like if the Times truly feels that Ohio in and of itself is not enough for a story that with Nevada and New Hampshire recount issues as well, they could assemble some sort of a major article on this topic? (AP article notes that the New Hampshire recount "ended with results changing little." I haven't read anything on the New Hamsphire's results, has anyone?)
Judith Miller turns in "another slam piece on the UN" notes Carl in an e-mail on this morning's Times (Miller's story appears on A12). No one's e-mailed yet to mention the Charlie Rose appearence. (I taped Charlie Rose last month when Katrina Vanden Heuvel was on. Making time to watch it, and I wanted to see that, was almost impossible. I wasn't curious as to Judith Miller or what she had to say.)
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! – What will yours do?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)