Friday, March 07, 2014

Corruption and killings -- Nouri's Iraq

The assault on Anbar Province continues.  UNHCR issued the following today:

GENEVA, March 7 (UNHCR) – The UN refugee agency on Friday said the continuing fighting in western Iraq's Anbar province has forced thousands more people to move to safety. Those affected are in various locations across the province, moving westwards from previously safe locations.
"During the last week the number of displaced people in the town of Heet and surrounding areas – which lies to the northwest of [the city of] Ramadi – has increased by some 25,000-30,000 people," UNHCR spokesman Adrian Edwards told journalists in Geneva.
Elsewhere in Anbar, an inter-agency mission this week by UNHCR, the World Food Programme and the UN Children's Fund assessed the living conditions and the needs of displaced people living in Al-Obaidy, some 450 kilometres northwest of Baghdad in the Al Qaim area.
Due to the poor security situation, the mission was forced to postpone part of their assessment. Al Qaim district hosts some 5,000 Syrian refugees, some 2,000 of them are in camp Al Obaidy while others are in host communities. The team met with people displaced to temporary houses and two collective shelters in Al-Obaidy town.
The team members identified many with specific needs, particularly female-headed households with large numbers of children. In one home, three female-headed families were cramped together in one small house with 13 children.
While the local communities have generously assisted the displaced, people are still in need of food and health care. Families living in unfinished houses lack blankets, mattresses, cooking facilities and clothing. As an immediate step, UNHCR is distributing aid packs to 300 families the team visited.
"The humanitarian needs of the displaced are growing rapidly. Prolonged displacement is putting pressure on both the displaced and host communities as they begin to exhaust their resources," Edwards said.
UNHCR and other humanitarian agencies are receiving an increasing number of requests for humanitarian assistance and support. UNHCR and partners are continuing to conduct assessments of the humanitarian needs. At present the shortage of shelter remains one of the most pressing issues.
Close to Baghdad, the city of Fallujah remains under siege, the roads remain closed and there are reports of shortages of fuel, food and other basic items. Armed clashes have been reported in the north, south and east of Fallujah, even during a 72-hour ceasefire initiated by the government of Iraq last week.
The situation in Ramadi is also volatile. Shelling and clashes have continued in recent days in the city and in rural neighbourhoods. As the situation deteriorates in the Al-Malab, Al-Bothaib and 20th Street areas, small groups of residents have fled and headed to Heet. The local council in Heet is still welcoming those fleeing, despite the significant burden on the local infrastructure, lack of sufficient accommodation and overstretched services. The district already accommodates some 11,250 displaced families.
To the north-east of Anbar, the first UN humanitarian assistance has in the past few days reached some 200 displaced families living in dire conditions in Sulayman Beg, Salah Al-Din governorate. They fled clashes last week in the north-east of the governorate.
As of Thursday, the number of people displaced in Anbar and the other governorates of Iraq is approximately 380,000. This represents almost 64,000 families, some 42,000 of whom have been displaced in Anbar, the largest governorate in Iraq.
On Wednesday, the Ministry of Migration and Displacement and the UN launched a strategic response plan to address the immediate humanitarian needs of people affected by the fighting in Anbar. The plan calls for US$103.7 million to cover the provision of assistance to 240,000 internally displaced people as well as host communities and those stranded in conflict-affected areas.
UNHCR requires US$26.3 million to address humanitarian needs of people displaced by the crisis in Anbar over the next six months. These needs are 11 per cent funded.


Nouri risks the lives of innocent civilians as he pursues collective punishment.  Collective punishment is legally defined as a War Crime.  The United States government recognizes that definition.  And yet the White House continues to arm the tyrant Nouri al-Maliki who then uses the weapons to attack the Iraqi people.

There's also Nouri's corruption.  CNN reports on Thursday's incident where Nouri's Transportation Minister refused to allow a plane from Lebanon to land in Baghdad until it turned around, returned to Beirut, to pick up his son who'd missed the flight.  Now that we're all on the same page, it should be pointed out the Nouri hasn't asked for the removal of the Transportation Minister (he can't fire him, only Parliament can).  Most importantly, it should be noted that this is a 24 hour investigation tops.  It's not that complicated.  But it will most likely just vanish like all of Nouri's previous investigations.

Through yesterday, violence has killed 228 people in Iraq this month according to Iraq Body Count.  Today:

National Iraqi News Agency reports 2 Khirbet Aziz Village roadside bombings left two Iraqi soldiers injured, an eastern Mosul roadside bombing left 1 Iraqi soldier dead and three more injured, an Alakhsaf battle left 6 rebels dead, a suicide car bomber in Ramadi took his own life and the lives of 3 Iraqi soldiers with four more left injured, a Baquba roadside bombing left three people injured, Joint Special Operations Command announced they killed 10 suspects in Falluja, a Tahrir roadside bombing left 1 person dead and two more injured, an al-Musayyib roadside bombing left 1 person dead and another injured, a second Ramadi suicide car bomber took his own life and the lives of 7 police members, police Colonel Miqdad Abdul Rahman al-Izzi and his brother Lt Gen Mahmoud al-Izzi were shot dead in al-Yarkon Village,  and, dropping back to late last night for the rest,  1 government official was shot dead in Khanaqin last night and a government employee left injured, and a Musayyib home bombing left five family members injured.



The following community sites -- plus Jake Tapper, Tavis Smiley, Cindy Sheehan, Ms. magazine's blog, Chocolate City, War News Radio, KPFK  and Pacifica Evening News -- updated last night and today:








  • Finally, David Bacon's latest book is Illegal People -- How Globalization Creates Migration and Criminalizes Immigrants (Beacon Press) which won the CLR James Award. We'll close with this from Bacon's "STRIKES AND CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE PROTEST FIRINGS AND DEPORTATIONS" (Working, In These Times):

    SAN LEANDRO AND EAST PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA, 2/26-7/14

    For the last six months, community and labor activists-mostly young- have sat down in front of buses carrying people to detention centers for deportation. In Tucson, they obstructed and chained themselves to ICE vans. In San Francisco, a few days after blocking a bus carrying deportees to detention, "Dreamer" Ju Hong-a young immigrant whose deportation was deferred in the White House's executive action two years ago-challenged President Obama during a local speech. "You have the power to stop deportation," the protester told him.

    In response to these actions and others like them, the cities of Los Angeles and San Francisco have passed resolutions demanding a moratorium on deportations;  San Francisco is imposing a halt in immigration-related firings as well.

    And the pressure is only intensifying. Last week, unions and community organizations closed down an intersection in front of a Silicon Valley supermarket chain where hundreds were fired after an inspection by ICE of company personnel records (an I-9 audit), intended to identify undocumented workers for termination. The next day, immigrant recycling workers in one San Leandro, Calif. trash facility walked out of work when their employer and the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency threatened their jobs in a similar audit.

    These protests are a direct response to the deportations and firing that have intensified as a result of the Obama administration's immigration enforcement policies. 







    The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.












    Cold Wings: The Soft and Stupid Kevin Drumettes

    Kevin Drum is a con artist.

    Was he always?

    I don't know.  He whored to help start the Iraq War, that's when he shows up on my radar.

    And Mother Jones needs not lecture about the lack of accountability on the part of the media re: selling war on Iraq with lies when their hires are people who sold the Iraq War.

    It takes a lot of gall for elements on the faux left -- that's Mother Jones -- to whine about no accountability on the part of the press when they're hiring a whore like Kevin Drum as opposed to, for example, Bill Scherr (Liberal Oasis) who opposed war on Iraq.


    Kevin writes ridiculous crap for Mother Jones that may or may not be clickable but is nothing but stupidity and con-jobs.

    Not long ago, I helped the Democratic leadership structure and define a poll that disproves Kevin's lies today.

    Is it impossible for that stupid little ___ to tell the truth?

    I have no idea.

    (Polling was done for the Democratic Party by a Dem polling firm run by a friend who called me because he felt their terms weren't precise enough and I looked over it and offered input.  After the polling, I looked over the results and offered an analysis.  This was done for a friend as a favor.  There was no payment.  The purpose of the poll, though not stated to me in words, was to determine whether certain Dems could run against Bully Boy Bush as an election strategy.)

    I'm sorry little Kevin never learned a damn thing in his life.  I'm ever sorrier that Mother Jones amplifies his stupidity.

    Dim-wit Drum's piece is entitled "George Bush Lost an Entire Generation for the Republican Party" and, based on a PEW poll, Drummy types:


    Whatever it was that Karl Rove and George Bush did—and there are plenty of possibilities, ranging from Iraq to gays to religion—they massively alienated an entire generation of voters. Sure, they managed to squeak out a couple of presidential victories, but they did it at the cost of losing millions of voters who will probably never fully return.


    He's so damn stupid.

    And you can encourage that stupidity if your job is to advance the Republican Party (I don't care one way or another -- I'm really over politicians who demonize their opponent but never offer any real alternatives while insisting "I'm better!") or if  your job is to rehabilitate the image of Bully Boy Bush (I do give a damn there, he's a War Criminal).

    If the world began in November 2000, Drum's stupidity might be more understandable.


    Kat's been trying to highlight this issue since the poll.  She hasn't talked about the poll but she's written about the damage this crap does.  (She's not written about the poll because she knows the person over it was a friend of mine.)  That's why she keeps calling out the crap Rachel Maddow offers.

    Bully Boy Bush did many awful things.  And convicted felon John Dean likes to maintain that BBB was worse than Nixon.  That's debatable.

    I was opposed to the war on Vietnam.  Many Americans were and worked to end it.  But I'm not stupid like Kevin, I'm aware that Nixon's actions regarding Watergate and his enemies list mattered even more to most Americans.

    Nixon resigned to avoid being impeached.  He left office in August 1974 in disgrace.

    He was in the middle of his term and Gerald Ford served out the remainder.

    Nixon was a Republican.

    In 1976, it was known that basically any Democrat could win the presidency (as was true in 2008 -- which was why the party, if it really was left, should have backed a left candidate and a not a corporatist trickster like Barack).

    This was huge, Nixon's disgrace.

    But it only resulted in one White House term for the Democrats.  A fact liars and whores like Kevin can't deal with it.

    Jimmy Carter had his problems (I voted for Jimmy, campaigned for him and will and have critiqued him here -- negatively and positively).  But Jimmy wasn't the reason that 1980 ushered in three terms of Republican presidencies.

    Liars and whores like Kevin Drum and Rachel Maddow were.  (And Elaine noted this herself back in 2008 at her blog.  She was already writing about how over the top the whoring was and how it was going to lead to a backlash against the left just as happened following the 70s.)

    If there was a reason to comment on Nixon, by all means do so.

    But the faux left (Democratic partisans without ethichs who only focus on the next election cycle) couldn't leave it alone.

    Just like Rachel Maddow this week insisting to Andrea Mitchell that Bully Boy Bush was responsible for the Ukraine crisis.

    Assume it were true (it's most likely not), it doesn't help the Democratic Party or Barack Obama to say that.

    In fact, everything in your stupid head that you keep spewing on MSNBC et al does not advance Barack or the Democratic Party.

    And that's fine to a degree, I'm not really invested in who someone's voting for.

    So they can overplay their hand as the whores of the mid and late 70s did.

    Jose or Renee watching Rachel Maddow at home?

    They're going to do the math.  Bully Boy Bush left the White House in January 2009.  It's March 2014?

    Most people are not going to buy that.

    Some will be amused but some are going to be ticked off.

    Because it's dishonest and Americans don't like being lied to.

    Reality, you can divide the electorate (those who vote) into thirds.

    A third will support the GOP (and Bully Boy Bush), a third will support the Dems and a third is swayed.

    This is not a hidden secret.

    In fact, this is why The Nation magazine, The Progessive and (sadly) Mother Jones are worthless, they grasp that they can sway a third (often referred to as "the middle").

    So instead of tackling issues that actually matter, they whore and whore some more.  Because it's all about the elections for these whores.  It's not about ending wars, it's not about helping the poor, it's not about schools or living standards, it's about elections.

    And these whores are dumb whores because they're the ones who push people away from the Democratic Party while they're trying to get them to vote for the Democrats.

    Nixon left office in disgrace.  His final years should have been a huge disgrace but he was refurbished and he had a state funeral and was treated like a leader and a 'statesman' and people felt the news 'for balance' to offer up China or some other nonsense.

    He's a criminal who resigned to avoid impeachment.

    How does he get redeemed?

    Faux 'left' whores who couldn't be honest.

    Like Rachel Maddow trying to pin the Ukraine on Bully Boy Bush, they overplayed their hand on Nixon.

    They kept pinning things on Nixon (who already had enough shame to cover every pore of his skin) and, in doing so, made what Nixon was actually guilty of a minor issue and caused doubt for some because the new charges never stopped emerging.

    I've stated repeatedly: Bully Boy Bush no longer occupies the White House and I'm so thankful for that.

    If we raise BBB these days, it's usually due to his installing Nouri al-Maliki as prime minister of Iraq (2006) and we follow that pointing by pointing out the reality that Nouri lost the 2010 elections and only got a second term because Barack Obama went around the voters, the Constitution and democracy to broker a contract (The Erbil Agreement) granting Nouri a second term.

    We're not obsessed with Bully Boy Bush.  Life moves on.  Iraqis suffer today under a tyrant and obsessing over the past is not addressing any of the realities of the last year.

    MSNBC and Rachel Maddow have now offered their second 'special' supposedly on the Iraq War -- as with their first, it was a special that featured no Iraqis.


    Their special is nothing but an attempt to interject Bully Boy Bush into the conversation, to try to rally that third or "the middle" to vote Democrat in 2014.

    It's not a news special and its a waste of the airwaves.

    But most of all?

    It's helping Bush and it's helping the Iraq War.

    These bulls**t stunts please MSNBC's tiny audience but outside of that?  They only harm.

    Because that third or 'middle' you want to sway?

    He or she is worried about their job, worried about their home, worried about friends and family, worried about whatever news issues they manage to learn about in an increasingly corrupt US media.

    They're aware that it's 2014.  The Bush hatred?  It doesn't just seem passe, it seems weak.

    On American Dad's "All About Steve," this exchange takes place:

    Hayley:  It's not my fault the job market sucks, I didn't vote for Bush.

    Roger:  Let it go, Hayley.

    That episode first aired in September 2005.

    It's only more true today.

    And when you keep piling on and make 'creative' charges that are difficult to prove or believe, you make it look like all your charges aren't that real and people start to doubt you and the charges -- including the original and valid charges against BBB.  That's why Nixon got a little image rehab.

    It's why Bully Boy Bush could as well -- not to mention the illegal Iraq War.

    Kevin Drum's a whore like Rachel Maddow.  Neither opposed the Iraq War.

    After it started and when public sentiment clearly turned against it, Drum and Maddow came along to pretend they were against it.

    These two whores and others like them didn't try to stop the Iraq War because they were worried about Democrats getting elected.

    Now they abuse and misuse the illegal war for partisan reasons again.

    If you were part of the peace movement and not just pretending to be, you need to be calling out these whores because their over reach and their nonstop b.s. distractions will change opinion on the illegal war.

    They don't care.

    They didn't care enough to oppose it before it started.

    They don't care enough today to tell you what Nouri al-Maliki's doing in Iraq or to focus on the Human Rights Watch reports.

    But they will gladly use the illegal war they cheered on to try to now drive up votes for Democrats.


    I don't want the Iraq War 'redeemed.'

    For those who don't care one way or the other about Iraq but do care about electing Dems?  Put your rabid dogs on a leash or in a kennel because all their yapping and barking is doing is pissing people off.

    Kevin Drum-ette fails to grasp the trend of aging which is men are more likely to grow more conservative as they age.  (This is true of a number of women as well but the percentage is unknown because studies have focused on men.  As usual, studies have focused on men.)

    There's another trend: It's called living life.

    Simplistic messaging is a lot harder the further one gets from campus life.

    Can we get a health inspector to Mother Jones?  They need to take the Kevin Drumettes off the menu before someone gets hurts.





    The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.























    xxxx

    Betrayal discussed on The Lead With Jake Tapper (CNN)










    As we noted in yesterday's snapshot, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand's needed bill went down in flames.  Today on CNN's The Lead With Jake Tapper, assault survivor BriGette McCoy talks about the "betrayal" and specifically names Senator Claire McCaskill.



    We'll use this opportunity to again note that Senator Gillibrand's office issued the following statement after the vote:

    March 6, 2014

    Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand delivered the following remarks Thursday following the vote on the bipartisan Military Justice Improvement Act, which despite having the support of a bipartisan majority of the Senate, fell five votes shy of breaking a filibuster.

    Senator Gillibrand’s remarks as prepared for delivery:

    I want to first thank my colleagues who stood so strong and united in this effort from the very beginning. Your leadership truly made the difference to gain the support of a majority of the Senate.

    From the very beginning – this was never about being a Democratic idea or a Republican idea. It was just the right thing to do – that people of good faith from both parties could unite around.

    And I want to thank the retired Generals, former commanders and veterans of every rank for making their voices heard – to make the military they love so dear as strong as it can be.

    And I want to especially thank all the survivors. We owe our gratitude to the brave survivors who, despite being betrayed by their chain of command, continue to serve their country by fighting for a justice system that will help make sure no one else suffers the same tragedy they did. Their struggles, sacrifice and courage inspire me every day.

    They may not wear the uniform anymore, but they believe so strongly in these reforms that for a full year now, they marched the halls of this Congress, reliving the horror they endured, telling their stories, in hopes that no one else who serves our country has to suffer as they did.

    Tragically, today the Senate failed them. Despite earning the support of the majority of the Senate, we fell five votes short of overcoming the 60-vote filibuster threshold. But we will not walk away, we will continue to work harder than ever in the coming year to strengthen our military.

    Without a doubt, with the National Defense bill we passed, and Senator McCaskill’s Victims Protection Act, we have taken good steps to stand up for victims, and hold offenders accountable.

    But we have not taken a step far enough. We know the deck is stacked against victims of sexual assault in the military, and today, we saw the same in the halls of Congress.

    For two full decades, since Dick Cheney served as the Defense Secretary during the Tailhook scandal that shook the military and shocked the nation, we’ve heard the same thing: “zero tolerance” to sexual assault in the military.

    But the truth is in the results, and that’s “zero accountability.”



    I always hoped we could do the right thing here – and deliver a military justice system that is free from bias and conflict of interest – a military justice system that is worthy of the brave men and women who fight for us.

    But today the Senate turned its back on a majority of its members.

    As painful as today’s vote is, our struggle on behalf of the brave men and women who serve in our military will go on. We owe so much to those who bravely serve our country, and I will never quit on them.

    For the men and women who sign up to serve our country for all the right reasons – only to be twice betrayed by their chain of command – if they can find the courage to make their voices heard to strengthen the military they hold so dear– we have to keep up this fight.

    We will continue to the fight for justice and accountability. That is our duty.
      





    The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.