Friday, March 23, 2018

Rand Paul reviews the spending bill

Senator Rand Paul reviews the $1.3 trillion spending bill that, if signed by President Donald Trump, will become law.



  1.  16 hours ago
    1. On page 207. 2000+ pages to go! Reading about the ever wasteful $6 billion National Science Foundation.
    1,119 replies6,151 retweets11,947 likes
     
     
  2.  16 hours ago
    2. Remember the $350,000 NSF spent asking if japanese quail are more sexually promiscuous on cocaine?
    212 replies2,607 retweets4,753 likes
     
     
  3.  16 hours ago
    3. Reading this monstrous bill full of grant programs begun decades ago reminds me of Reagan’s critique: the nearest thing to immortality is a government program.
    150 replies2,385 retweets5,274 likes
     
     
  4.  16 hours ago
    Page 226 of terrible, no good, rotten deficit spending bill. I found a kernel of hope: “no funds in this act will be used to support or justify torture."
    143 replies1,206 retweets3,325 likes
     
     
  5.  16 hours ago
    Page 240 good news for states rights: no funds will be spent to prevent any state’s medical marijuana initiatives. Thank you Congr. Rohrbacher
    96 replies1,758 retweets4,554 likes
     
     
  6.  16 hours ago
    Page 278. (1954 to go!) $961 million to destroy our chemical weapons. Who was it, exactly, who convinced our government to pay billions to develop weapons we now find deplorable?
    181 replies2,018 retweets4,387 likes
     
     
  7.  15 hours ago
    Page 281 of “crumni-bus”. CIA retirement funding. Wouldn’t it be great to amend out the retirement benefits of Trump hater John Brennan and Congressional dissembler James Clapper?
    462 replies2,985 retweets6,261 likes
     
     
  8.  15 hours ago
    Here are a few more highlights: o $1m for the Cultural Antiquities Task Force o $6.25m for the Ambassadors Fund for Cultural Preservation o $20m for Countering Foreign State Propaganda o $12m for Countering State Disinformation and Pressure
    266 replies2,529 retweets3,170 likes
     
     
  9.  15 hours ago
    o $5m for Vietnam Education Foundation Grants o $2.579m for Commission on Security and Co-operation in Europe o $15m to USAID for promoting international higher education between universities o $2.696bn for International Disaster Assistance
    186 replies2,226 retweets2,700 likes
     
     
  10.  15 hours ago
    o $1.371bn for Contributions to International Organizations o $51m to promote International Family Planning and Reproductive Health o $7m promoting International Conservation o $10m for UN Environmental Programs
    350 replies2,664 retweets2,913 likes
     
     
  11.  15 hours ago
    o $1m for the World Meteorological Organization o $218m for Promoting Democracy Development in Europe (yep..the birthplace of democracy needs promoting) o $25m for International Religious Freedom o $10m for disadvantaged Egyptian Students
    445 replies3,426 retweets4,159 likes
     
     
  12.  15 hours ago
    o $12m for Scholarships for Lebanon o $20m for Middle East Partnership Initiative Scholarship Program o $12m in military funding for Vietnam o $3.5m in nutrition assistance to Laos o $15m in Developmental assistance to China o $10m for Women LEOs in Afghanistan
    1,229 replies4,460 retweets5,102 likes
     
     
  13.  14 hours ago
    on page 355. NSA prohibited from targeting US persons with FISA 702 program. sounds good —but — privacy advocates fear that NSA still does back-door targeting of US persons. Courageous Senator Wyden has asked how many US persons caught up in supposedly foreign data base.
    57 replies1,474 retweets2,806 likes
     
     
  14.  14 hours ago
    But Brennan and Clapper too busy spewing hatred of Trump to respond to legitimate requests.
    69 replies1,448 retweets3,276 likes
     
     
Page 357. Sec. 8116 no funds can be used in Iraq in contravention of the War Powers Act sounds good but . . . haven’t we been back in Iraq at war against new foes without any new congressional authorization?
3:01 PM - 22 Mar 2018
28 replies1,021 retweets2,245 likes
 
 
    1. New conversation
    1.  14 hours ago
      Page 348 of terrible, rotten, no-good budget busting bill, a nugget that I wish we obeyed sec. 8103: none of the funds may be used in contravention of the War Powers Act
      24 replies1,088 retweets2,139 likes
       
       
    2.  14 hours ago
      hmm . . . that would mean we shouldn’t be spending $ in undeclared wars in Yemen, Libya, Niger, Somalia, Afghanistan wonder why the party that talks about the rule of law, doesn’t obey the rule of law?
      69 replies1,503 retweets3,396 likes
       
       
    3.  14 hours ago
      and I’m STILL reading. This bill is no thriller. Page 365: Overseas contingency operations. aka military slush fund that circumvents budget caps. All told, we’ve spent over a trillion dollars in this budget busting category.
      74 replies1,306 retweets2,551 likes
       
       
    4.  14 hours ago
      Page 376 of terrible, rotten, no-good budget busting bill: I found it! I found it! Border security, what President Trump wanted! no . . .wait a minute section says Defense can spend what funds it determines to enhance the border security of Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt, and Tunisia
      384 replies4,455 retweets6,266 likes
       
       
    5.  14 hours ago
      eyes getting tired but really someone should read this beast. Page 392 sec 9007: no $ shall be spent “for the permanent stationing of US forces in Afghanistan” Wonder what they meant by permanent? Some might argue that after 16 years we approaching the definition of permanent.
      224 replies2,138 retweets5,075 likes
       
       
    6.  13 hours ago
      Page 430 of “crumni-bus:” Good news. The government is going to “earn” $350 million by selling oil from Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Bad news is the $ won’t go to reduce the $21 trillion debt. The $ will be instead be spent elsewhere by the Federal government.
      85 replies1,630 retweets2,532 likes
       
       
    7.  13 hours ago
      Page 447: a little over $30 billion for Dept of Energy Wonder if anyone would notice if we had no Dept of Energy Put oversight of nuclear waste in DOD and let supply & demand be our Energy policy
      169 replies1,943 retweets4,436 likes
       
       
    8.  13 hours ago
      Page 485: No $ used by the IRS to target citizens for exercising 1st amendment rights. Do you think Lois Lerner knew about this part of the law before she targeted Tea Party groups?
      173 replies2,209 retweets5,117 likes
       
       
    9.  13 hours ago
      Ordered some pizza to help me get through. Still going...
      526 replies1,477 retweets5,638 likes
       
       
    10.  12 hours ago
      page 550: $9 billion for Govt Services Admin that oversees federal properties Fed government spends $1.7 billion a year to maintain 770,000 empty buildings while continuing to buy new properties.
      173 replies2,112 retweets2,880 likes
       
       
    11.  12 hours ago
      General Services Administration database of properties for sale is not available to public, Congress or other federal agencies. Govt Acctbility Office says govt continues to hold more property than it needs. No matter. . .this year the big spenders still give GSA big $
      42 replies914 retweets1,677 likes
       
       
    12.  12 hours ago
      Page 580: Post Office gets $58 million but only if it promises not to close down small, underutilized, money-losing post offices.
      204 replies1,293 retweets2,370 likes
       
       
    13.  12 hours ago
      Page 587: No $ for the President to request FBI background report on any individual. If we had amendments, this would be a good place to add no $ for partisan hacks in the Intel community to unmask any American without a judicial warrant.
      79 replies1,721 retweets3,632 likes
       
       
    14.  12 hours ago
      Page 594 sec 626: No $ to require disclosure of content of an electronic communication. Good amendment here. It would be to also protect forced disclosure of metadata, ie phone #’s and identities of the phone callers.
      38 replies891 retweets2,371 likes
       
       
    15.  12 hours ago
      I shared 600 pages tonight. I’m done tweeting them for the evening. If they insist on voting, I will vote no because it spends to much and there’s just too little time to read the bill and let everyone know what’s actually in it. Thanks for sticking with me.
      1,648 replies4,766 retweets14,423 likes
       
       
at