Sunday, September 21, 2025

Chump's war on immigrants

Starting with this from WEEKEND EDITION SUNDAY:


AYESHA RASCOE, HOST:

Chicago has a long, proud history of activism and is considered by many the birthplace of community organizing. So it's no surprise that there's fierce opposition in the city to increased immigration enforcement. On Friday, Immigration and Customs Enforcement - or ICE - said it made 400 arrests since it launched Operation Midway Blitz two weeks ago. Resistance in the city is attracting many who are becoming politically active for the first time, as Jessica Pupovac reports.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

UNIDENTIFIED PROTESTER: (Chanting) No more suspicion (ph)...

UNIDENTIFIED PROTESTERS: (Chanting) No more suspicion (ph)...

UNIDENTIFIED PROTESTER: ...(Chanting) From fascist politicians.

UNIDENTIFIED PROTESTERS: ...(Chanting) From fascist politicians.

JESSICA PUPOVAC: Outside an ICE processing facility in the Chicago suburb of Broadview, armed federal agents in tactical gear and gas masks recently stared down about 50 demonstrators. Jose Richter (ph) stood toward the front, wearing a pro-Second Amendment hat. He was in his work clothes, a black security guard uniform with an American flag on the sleeve.

JOSE RICHTER: I do security at Navy Pier.

PUPOVAC: Have you been to many protests?

RICHTER: No. This is my first one.

PUPOVAC: Richter is a U.S. Army veteran, born in Mexico and adopted by a U.S. family as a child. He has legal status but said he's standing up for those who don't.

RICHTER: I never seen this, how they discriminate if you're Latino and looking at you like a criminal. That's not right. My old friends, they got deported already. They went to court. Not even 10 minutes, they were out of the courthouse, sent back to Mexico. And it shouldn't be like that. We're not in Russia. They need to stop it.

PUPOVAC: The Trump administration's crackdown on illegal immigration has sparked a wave of new organizing here and inspired many first-time activists like Richter and Kevin Naglich. Naglich used to work in cybersecurity. Now he's devoting most of his time to resisting Trump's second-term agenda, including his call for mass deportations.


Since September 8th, Chump has sent ICE into a war against Chicago.  People don't really seem to get that.  We're the United States -- not the Divided States.  We're not supposed to be at war with one another and certainly not while a member of the "state's rights" party occupies the White House.  But here we are.  Laws violated, democracy trashed.  All the signs that Chump's been here.  Nicole Acevedo (NBC NEWS) reports:

Nearly a week after a Mexican immigrant was fatally shot by an immigration officer during a traffic stop in the Chicago area, his family in Mexico and community members continue to seek answers as they call for more transparency in the probe looking into the sequence of events surrounding his death.

The Mexican Consulate in Chicago and local police confirmed the the FBI is leading the investigation into the death of 38-year-old Silverio Villegas González, a single father of two boys.

A spokesperson for the FBI Chicago Field Office did not confirm or deny their involvement in the investigation, but told NBC News in an email that "as a general matter, we examine the facts with consideration of federal criminal statutes. We then proceed as appropriate, whether by investigating or referring the matter to the relevant partners."

With law enforcement releasing little information about the ongoing probe, some community members in the Chicago area feel like they "have to stitch this together" themselves, with "no expectation of a real investigation," Brandon Lee, an organizer with the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights. "The community is expected to do their own."

Speaking to Telemundo Chicago from Mexico, Jorge Villegas González, Silverio's brother, said his family "wants justice to be done."


We could consult the footage from the body cam; however, the ICE agent "was not wearing a body camera."  How convenient, right?

They've been caught on camera multiple times where they stop someone and surround him or her and then while he answers the questions one ICE agent asks, another steps behind the one being questioned and shoves him/her into the ICE agent asking questions.  That's not an accident.  They do intentionally because then they can lie further and claim assault.  


This has been captured on camera repeatedly.


If that happened once to real officer of the law -- one with actual training -- that officer would be kicked off the force.


Anthony Callahan (WSWS) reports:

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has instituted a policy of mass arrests and deportations of Michigan immigrants under Trump’s executive orders claiming the need to rid the country of “the worst of the worst” criminals. A report published September 4 by the Detroit News directly refutes these lies. By far, most immigrants arrested in Michigan have been innocent of any crime. Close to two-thirds, or 65 percent, of the more than 3,100 people Detroit ICE arrested from January to July had no convictions. Most had never been charged with a crime.

The Deportation Data Project, a database maintained by lawyers and academics using Freedom of Information Act requests to ICE and US Customs and Border Protection (CBP), shows that only approximately 35 percent of these immigrants were convicted of any crime. The remaining 65 percent of the arrests targeted people who either had pending criminal charges, that is, had not yet pled guilty or been convicted of a crime, or had no criminal history whatsoever.

While many immigrant families are unable to speak publicly, those who have spoken have shed light on the unspeakable brutality being meted out to people who happen to have been born in other countries and are seeking to make a life in the US.

As part of its report, the News spoke with Taicha, an autoworker at the Lansing General Motors plant, whose Haitian husband has been detained since August. The case is an example of the egregious violations of democratic rights taking place. Taicha is a lawful permanent resident of the United States. Her husband, Mike entered the United States in October 2023, using the CBPOne mobile app to apply for asylum. He was granted permission to live and work in the US. In 2024, he applied for Temporary Protective Status (TPS), but his application was still pending in June when Trump ended the program.


Did Anthony miss a key fact or just decide not to report on it -- you know, the immigrant protection in Michigan that Chump's agreed to protect due to the way the state voted.  We all just going to ignore that fact forever?


Meanwhile, the Center for American Progress notes:

On July 4, 2025, President Donald Trump signed into law a massive, partisan budget bill: the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA). This bill—which congressional Republicans passed—makes devastating cuts to programs such as Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) that help Americans meet their basic needs while giving massive tax breaks to the wealthy. The OBBBA—combined with other changes to the Affordable Care Act enacted by the president and congressional Republicans—will leave 15 million more people without health insurance and cause about 4 million people to have their food assistance terminated or cut substantially.

However, the harmful impacts of the law don’t stop there. The new law provides an unprecedented increase in funding to implement the Trump administration’s mass deportation agenda with zero accountability, after congressional Republicans rejected multiple requests to amend the bill to place checks on the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) use of these funds. The law provides $45 billion—available through fiscal year 2029—to dramatically expand Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention capacity to 100,000 beds. Additionally, the law appropriates nearly $30 billion for ICE personnel and enforcement operations. It pushes ICE’s overall annual budget of around $9.9 billion in fiscal year 2024 to $28 billion. The OBBBA will nearly triple ICE’s budget with this infusion of additional funding while taking away valuable support for vulnerable populations, including more than $1 trillion in cuts to medical care for children, the elderly, and disabled people. Even prior to the OBBBA, ICE and its contractors have operated without sufficient accountability and oversight. This funding increase will only enhance the Trump administration’s cruel immigration actions without making Americans safer.

In response to the Trump administration’s arbitrary demand that DHS arrest 3,000 immigrants per day, ICE has operated with impunity. The administration has essentially dismantled congressionally created watchdog agencies that provided oversight of DHS, including monitoring immigration detention and ensuring the protection of detainees’ civil rights. Unless Congress steps up and demands accountability for the slush fund, DHS under the Trump administration now has at its disposal the additional funding provided by the OBBBA. This funding will be used to further escalate the Trump administration’s unprecedented and indiscriminate deportation agenda that separates families, detains students and children, and terrorizes communities. Although we are already seeing the effects of the administration’s cruel, anti-immigrant policies, the full extent of the economic and human impact on families and communities will only multiply as these funds are expended.


Let's wind down with this from Senator Patty Murray's office:


Senate Judiciary Committee report: Trump Administration appears to have ended presumption of release, is detaining more and more pregnant women in facilities ill-equipped to manage their well-being and safety;

ICYMI: Senator Murray Leads Colleagues in Reintroducing Legislation to Prevent the Shackling and Mistreatment of Pregnant Women in ICE and CBP Custody

***LETTER HERE***

Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), a senior member and former Chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pension (HELP) Committee, and Senator Blumenthal (D-CT), a member of the Judiciary Committee, led 27 of their Senate colleagues in a new letter expressing grave concerns about the prevalence and treatment of pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention. In their letter to U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, the lawmakers urgently requested that ICE stop detaining pregnant women absent exceptional circumstances, and asked the Department to provide information about the number of pregnant women in its custody and the treatment of pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women who are in ICE detention—as well as answers to a long list of additional oversight questions no later than September 26th.

A Government Accountability Office (GAO) study published in 2020 found that between 2016 and 2018, ICE detained pregnant women over 4,600 times. As Congress increased its oversight into the detention of pregnant women, that number dropped to just 158 pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women detained in the first half of Fiscal Year 2024. After President Trump took office this year, the Administration stopped providing reports to Congress on the number of pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women in their custody.

“We write to express grave concerns about the prevalence and treatment of pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention. A recent Senate Judiciary Committee site visit and media reports point to the alarming detention of a significant number of pregnant women in ICE custody. We urgently request that ICE cease detaining pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women absent exceptional circumstances and that the agency provide information about the number and treatment of pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women in its custody,” the senators wrote. In their letter, the senators referenced reporting on 911 calls recorded from ICE facilities involving pregnant women in “distress, bleeding or suffering severe pain,” as well as a recent Senate Judiciary Committee staff visit to the South Louisiana ICE Processing Center in Basile, LA that found 14 pregnant women—a shockingly large number—detained at the time of the visit, with many of them receiving little to no medical care.

“Medical research links ICE detention to high rates of pregnancy complications, with physicians finding serious risks to both fetal and maternal health.  These already serious risks are heightened by the deteriorating conditions inside detention facilities, including severe overcrowding, reports of inadequate food and water, and lack of emergency medical care,” the senators continued. “At this time, we do not know how many pregnant women are in ICE custody, whether U.S. citizen babies have been born in ICE custody, and what provisions have been made for mothers’ and children’s health, safety, and wellbeing.”

“ICE’s own standards are unambiguous on the detention, monitoring, and treatment of pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women in detention. ICE Directive 11032.4, Identification and Monitoring of Pregnant, Postpartum, or Nursing Individuals (2021 Pregnancy Directive), states that ICE should not detain pregnant, postpartum, or nursing individuals except under very limited circumstances,” the senators wrote. “If detention of these individuals is deemed absolutely necessary, the directive provides detailed requirements for ensuring that they are monitored closely, kept in suitable facilities, and given access to both routine and emergency health care… Given the urgent nature of pregnant women’s health and safety needs, we request that you ensure all detention facilities are in full compliance with current law and the 2021 Pregnancy Directive.”

Senator Murray has long fought against the mistreatment of pregnant women in detention, and leads legislation—the Stop Shackling and Detaining Pregnant Women Act—that would provide permanent safeguards for pregnant and postpartum women in ICE and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) custody. She first introduced the legislation in 2018 during the 115th Congress, and reintroduced it in 2019—on the heels of a Washington Post report about a woman in ICE custody whose pregnancy ended in a stillbirth after she went into labor prematurely—2023, and 2025 alongside Congresswoman Sylvia Garcia (D, TX-29), who leads companion legislation in the House of Representatives.

“In defiance of medical evidence counseling against their detention, ICE is horrifically detaining pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women in conditions that compromise their physical and mental health,” said Jennifer Ibañez Whitlock, Senior Policy Counsel for the National Immigration Law Center. “It is clear that ICE is ill-prepared to meet even the minimum healthcare and safety standards for pregnant women in their custody. The National Immigration Law Center calls on Secretary Noem to immediately halt the detention of pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women, resume transparent reporting, and ensure full compliance with federal law and agency directives. The health and dignity of these women must no longer be compromised.”

“U.S. policy makes clear that pregnant, postpartum, and lactating women should not be detained — yet ICE continues to ignore these protections,” said Zain Lakhani, Director of Migrant Rights and Justice at the Women’s Refugee Commission. “We continue to hear reports of pregnant women being held in dangerous conditions without adequate food or medical care, putting their health and lives at risk. These harms are occurring in a black box, where we know precious little about immigrant women’s access to healthcare and nutrition. We thank Senators Murray and Blumenthal for demanding that the Department of Homeland Security end this inhumane practice and call for vital transparency around their access to services. Together we must shine a light on detention conditions and ensure these women and their babies are treated with safety, dignity, and humanity.”

In addition to Murray and Blumenthal, the following 27 senators also signed onto the letter to Secretary Noem: Michael Bennet (D-CO), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Maria Cantwell (D-WA), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NM), Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), Richard Durbin (D-IL), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), John Hickenlooper (D-CO), Mazie Hirono (D-HI), Andy Kim (D-NJ), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Ben Ray Luján (D-NM), Ed Markey (D-MA), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Alex Padilla (D-CA), Jack Reed (D-RI), Jacky Rosen (D-NV), Brian Schatz (D-HI), Adam Schiff (D-CA), Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Tina Smith (D-MN), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Raphael Warnock (D-GA), Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Peter Welch (D-VT), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), and Ron Wyden (D-OR).

The full text of the letter is available HERE and below.

Secretary Noem:

We write to express grave concerns about the prevalence and treatment of pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention. A recent Senate Judiciary Committee site visit and media reports point to the alarming detention of a significant number of pregnant women in ICE custody. We urgently request that ICE cease detaining pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women absent exceptional circumstances and that the agency provide information about the number and treatment of pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women in its custody.

Medical research links ICE detention to high rates of pregnancy complications, with physicians finding serious risks to both fetal and maternal health. These already serious risks are heightened by the deteriorating conditions inside detention facilities, including severe overcrowding, reports of inadequate food and water, and lack of emergency medical care. According to one media investigation, since January 2025, at least four 911 calls have been recorded from ICE detention facilities involving pregnant women in “distress, bleeding or suffering severe pain”– including one involving a facility staff member. A recent Senate Judiciary Committee staff visit to the South Louisiana ICE Processing Center in Basile, Louisiana revealed that 14 pregnant women—a shockingly large number—were detained at the time of the visit. Women reported receiving little to no medical care and insufficient nutrition; some reported having never been seen by a physician in the facility, despite efforts to get care. The report shares an anecdote of “a pregnant woman who had a miscarriage while detained and was allegedly still bleeding when she was deported.”

Since the start of the Trump administration, accurate information about the number of pregnant women in ICE custody has been difficult to ascertain. Until this year, ICE provided semiannual reports to Congress on the number and treatment of pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women in immigration detention; however this previously required reporting has now ceased. Moreover, the effective closure of the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties and Office of the Immigration Detention Ombudsman means that there is little visibility and independent oversight of the treatment of vulnerable populations, including pregnant women.  At this time, we do not know how many pregnant women are in ICE custody, whether U.S. citizen babies have been born in ICE custody, and what provisions have been made for mothers’ and children’s health, safety, and wellbeing.

ICE’s own standards are unambiguous on the detention, monitoring, and treatment of pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women in detention. ICE Directive 11032.4, Identification and Monitoring of Pregnant, Postpartum, or Nursing Individuals (2021 Pregnancy Directive), states that ICE should not detain pregnant, postpartum, or nursing individuals except under very limited circumstances.  If detention of these individuals is deemed absolutely necessary, the directive provides detailed requirements for ensuring that they are monitored closely, kept in suitable facilities, and given access to both routine and emergency health care. ICE recently reaffirmed its commitment to the health and safety of detained pregnant women in the 2025 revisions to its National Detention Standards.

In response to our concerns that pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women may not be receiving necessary monitoring, health care, and treatment, we request answers to the following questions by September 26, 2025.

  1. As of the date of receipt of this letter, how many women currently in ICE custody are known to be pregnant, postpartum, and nursing? Please provide totals for each category. How many of those women currently are in their third trimester of pregnancy? For the purposes of defining “postpartum,” please use the number of women in the one-year period following the end of pregnancy.
  2. Section 5.4 of the 2021 Pregnancy Directive requires that pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women receive weekly evaluations to determine whether continued detention is appropriate.
    1. What is the process for conducting these evaluations and what criteria are used? From January 1, 2025 to the date of receipt of this letter, how many pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women have been released pursuant to one of these screenings? Who is conducting these evaluations and are they reported to ICE headquarters? If yes, what office?
    2. From January 1, 2025 to the date of receipt of this letter, how many have remained in ICE custody? Of those pregnant women who received determinations to remain in custody, how many were in their third trimester?
  3. Have any women given birth in ICE facilities from January 1, 2025 to the date of receipt of this letter, including both live and stillborn births? If so, how many live and stillborn births and in which facilities? In that same time frame, how many miscarriages have occurred?
  4. All children born on U.S. soil, including at ICE detention facilities, are U.S. citizens. For any child born in ICE custody, what is the process for allowing their mothers to secure U.S. birth certificates and other vital documents? Have any women been deported before having an opportunity to seek and obtain a birth certificate for their child?
  5. How many pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women have been deported since January 1, 2025? Please provide the monthly total.
  6. Section 2 of the 2021 Pregnancy Directive requires that pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women be detained in facilities that are suitable for their physical and mental health needs.
    1. What ICE facilities currently detain pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women? Please provide a list by facility name and location.
    2. What are the criteria for determining if a facility is suitable for pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women? Of the pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women in ICE custody, how many were detained in facilities that have been deemed suitable according to these criteria from January 1, 2025 to the date of receipt of this letter? What ICE office determined those facilities were suitable and when was that determination made?
    3. How many women since January 1, 2025 have been transferred into a suitable facility once it is discovered that they are pregnant, postpartum, and nursing? How many of these transfers occurred because the woman was pregnant?
  7. Since January 1, 2025, how many approved referrals for offsite obstetrics and gynecology services have been completed? How many inpatient hospitalizations related to active labor and birth for ICE detainees have occurred since January 1, 2025?
  8. Please describe pregnant women’s access to prenatal and postnatal health care in all ICE facilities that detain pregnant women, including routine medical examinations, treatment for pregnancy complications, and access to medical specialists such as OB/GYNs.
  9. Please describe the provisions for ensuring safe labor and delivery, including an opportunity for mother and child to bond immediately after birth.
  10. Current law (Section 528 of P.L. 118-47) and Section 2.3 of the 2021 Pregnancy Directive severely curtails the use of restraints on pregnant women at any time and prohibits them entirely during active labor and delivery.  If restraints are used, documented medical approval is required. Since January 1, 2025, have any pregnant women been placed in restraints? If yes, how many and at which locations have restraints been used on pregnant women?
  11. Please describe any provisions for ensuring that pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women have access to a diet that meets the U.S. government recommended dietary guidelines for pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women, which includes including fruits, dairy products, vegetables, to support a healthy pregnancy and ensure their safety after birth.

Given the urgent nature of pregnant women’s health and safety needs, we request that you ensure all detention facilities are in full compliance with current law and the 2021 Pregnancy Directive. We also request as a sign of your agency’s commitment to the care of all individuals in your custody that you immediately resume semiannual reporting on Pregnant, Postpartum, and Lactating Individuals in Immigration Detention.

We look forward to receipt of this reporting and responses to our questions.

###

Isaiah's THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS "The Homan Side Hustle Press Briefing" went up this morning.  The following sites updated:

 

Posted by at