Wednesday, July 22, 2026

The Snapshot

Wednesday, July 22, 2026.  Pete Hegseth goes begging to Congress for more money, Todd Blanche doesn't want to pay the court ordered fines, the Iran War continues with no end in sight, and much more. 


Senator Patty Murray:  143 days ago, President Trump started a war of his own choosing with Iran.  He did not consult Congress. He did not get authorization from Congress.  He did not build a coalition of allies.  He did not make a case to the American people. Nor did he ever win their support. Two-thirds of Americans oppose the war.  And the president's decision had catastrophic costs.  Seventeen American servicemembers have now died.  That includes three who tragically lost their lives over the last few days. And another is still missing.  Several hundred more have been injured -- including nearly 100 who have been hurt in just the last few weeks.  We owe all of them and their families a debt of gratitude we can never repay.  Thousands of civilians have also been killed.  The administration will not tell the public -- or Congress -- the true financial costs of the war but we know it is very well into the tens of billions of dollars.  Tax dollars we could've spent helping people afford health care-- or building new housing -- have now been lit on fire by a president who blundered us into a disastrous war.  And the costs to families' bank accounts are staggering.  Economic growth has slowed to a crawl. Inflation has shot up about 50% since this war began.  On average, gas cost just under three dollars on February 28. Today, it’s over four dollars and ticking back up with the Strait closed again. Americans have now paid more than $70 billion more on gas since the war began. That is $550 more per household.  Fertilizer costs skyrocketed in the middle of spring planting, crushing farmers operating on extremely thin margins, and costing families more on just about everything they buy at the grocery store.  The costs of this war have been astronomical. And what has it been for? What has actually been achieved?  We hear a different rationale for this war every few days. It was about preempting 'imminent threats,' which we now know did not exist. It was about regime change, then liberating the Iranian people. It was about destroying Iran's nuclear program and its navy. And at one point, it was about taking out its ballistic missiles until, that is, the president decided that actually ‘it’s a little bit unfair for them not to have some.’ Trump has even suggested the war is about taking Iran's oil to "make a fortune."  And now, the United States' primary strategic objective seems to actually just be reopening the Strait of Hormuz, which, of course, was fully open -- toll-free --before the war began.

 

That's Senator Patty Murray speaking at yesterday afternoon's Senate Appropriations Committee that Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and Gen John D. Caine, Chair of the Joint-Chiefs, testified before as they sought more money for Chump's war of choice. 

 Chump started this war with lies, told the American people about it in a early morning broadcast -- of a pre-taped speech.  From the get-go, Chump and his cronies have repeatedly lied.  Senator Kirsten Gillibrand confronted Hegseth on the administration's inability to speak honestly and truthfully.

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand: Secretary Hegseth, the reason why people are so upset, the reason why they are so upset with you and this administration is because the words you have used in the past don't add up. About Iran specifically: you said that we had "obliterated," quote-unquote, Iran's ability to create nuclear weapons. The president made the same claim. Yet eight months later, in February of 2026, the president launched an active war, claiming Iran was within two weeks of having a weapon. So when you say two very different things, the American people don't know who to believe or what to believe. They just know they can't afford their healthcare, they can't afford their food, they can't afford housing, and our farmers are continuing to suffer. So, which is true? Was it obliterated, or wasn't it? What;s the status?

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth: The nuclear sites under Midnight Hammer were obliterated. But the Iranians foolishly continued to attempt to pursue nuclear capabilities, which is why we destroyed their defense industrial base and so many of their other capabilities, to ensure they can't get to a nuclear weapon. So we're staying laser-focused on the objective, and you're trying to make campaign commercials. And that's fine.

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand: No we're not. So listen to this: You also say that you made the missile program, quote, "destroyed and made combat ineffective." Quote, "Iran's entire ballistic missile production capacity, every company that builds every component of those missiles, has been functionally defeated --  destroyed," and that the missile program's "existing stockpiles depleted and decimated, almost completely ineffective." So why are there missiles left to hit Jordan and result in the loss of life of our brave men and women?

Secretary Pete Hegseth: As we stated from the beginning, the Iranian defense industrial base is effectively gone. But they do have underground facilities, because they're the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism, and they've spent 47 years trying to hide their missiles under mountains, just like their nuclear capabilities, because they would like to get a nuclear weapon to wield it against us.

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand: We just don't know what version of the war to believe. Because it's either over or it's not over, it's within two weeks or it's not two weeks, we have no missiles or we have missiles. And that consternation is why so many New Yorkers are perplexed, stressed out, and find this war to be incredibly unpopular. Because they don't understand the choices that the president's making, they don't agree with those choices. 


Senator Patty Murray -- who is the co-chair of the Committee -- also noted the differences between what Hegsteh and Chump claim from one moment to the next. But let's instead focus on her noting the monies.  

Co-Chair Patty Murray: Secretary Hegseth, your department received $150 billion last year in the Republicans' "Big Beautiful Bill." And it also received a record $839 billion for fiscal year 2026 --  more money than you asked for last year. Combined, that is a $1 trillion budget for the year -- and as I already mentioned, your department has yet to spend half of the reconciliation funds.  Despite that, you are here today asking for tens of billions of dollars more for things that you've already asked for in your FY27 request or that have nothing to do with Iran.  This administration has tried to sell this as an emergency request, but it may be better understood as an attempt to skirt the normal appropriations process.  Here are just a few of the things requested in this "Iran" supplemental: $800 million for the National Guard to patrol DC even longer. Over $1 billion for the Army to patrol the southern border, which is DHS's job. $900 million to support the administration's illegal boat strikes in the Caribbean. Over $18 billion for munitions, which you have already requested in your FY27 budget request. And $1.7 billion to pay for your decision to recruit more people than the services need, which was not contemplated by the FY26 funding bill Congress recently passed. Now, you have already submitted a reprogramming request on this that our subcommittee is considering now, which really underscores the point I made in my opening remarks that the problem is not a lack of money, but poor planning.  So, I'll be blunt: the truth is your request does not make a lot of sense. So, let me ask you a simple question: Why exactly are billions of dollars more for the National Guard and this administration's illegal strikes in the Caribbean urgently needed for the Iran war?

Secretary Pete Hegseth:  Well, Senator, I wouldn't -- of course -- agree with your characterization, but why this kind of spending is needed is because of the gross negligence and neglect of the Biden administration inside our department. [Biden] ran it like a bureaucracy, abandoned our strength posture around the world, so we're having to reestablish deterrence.  You mentioned the end strength numbers, and I will acknowledge that we are ahead of schedule on end strength in recruiting, 8,000 in the Navy, 6,000 in the Army, 4,000 in the Air Force. Because under President Trump, there's been record and historic over 30-year recruiting records inside our department since he won the election. Because the American people didn't want to sign up for what Joe Biden was providing our military, and they want to sign up for what President Trump is doing in his leadership, and so those are good problems to have that we need to fund, and a reflection of momentum. And this budget will allow us to continue the kind of momentum that gets us ahead.

Co-Chair Patty Murray:  My point is that a lot of this request does not feel like an emergency.  



Senator Chris Murphy found that if you repeatedly asked the same question, you would finally get an answer from Hegseth.

Senator Chris Murphy: Thank you all for being here today, Secretary Hegseth. The American people either didn't want this war or were deeply skeptical of this war because they have seen this country make the same mistake over and over again in wars in the Middle East, and that is to create either unrealistic or open-ended objectives. You said in March that the United States was "on plan to defeat, destroy, and disable all of Iran's meaningful military capabilities at a pace that the world has never seen before." Obviously, as we've discussed here today, that objective has not been achieved and is not going to be achieved. Iran is adept, more adept than even at the start of the war, at hiding their capabilities or repairing after damage we have done. There's an open report that when it comes to their missile sites along the Strait of Hormuz, 30 of 33 are still operational.

Secretary Pete Hegseth: I wouldn't believe all the open reports, Senator.

Senator Chris Murphy: But I've also heard you say in this hearing that the objectives now seem to be more limited than they were at the outset of the war. That this is about reopening the Strait and this is about dismantling nuclear capability. And the president, of course, has said himself that he thinks Iran has a right to a missile program.  So, my question is pretty simple: Is it correct that it is no longer a war objective to destroy all of their military capacities? This is what the president has said. Have our goals been simplified to reopening the Strait and to getting into a negotiation over a nuclear program. Now, I don't think you have a realistic plan to do either of those things, but I think it's important for us to know what we're funding. Are the objectives much more limited today than they were when you made that statement in March?


Secretary Pete Hegseth: So, I think the objectives have been consistent and clear from the beginning. And I would compare it to North Korea, where a conventional buildup was used to hide a nuclear capability that eventually evolved to a point where it couldn't be contested. And what Iran continued to do, even after Midnight Hammer, was try to build that conventional capability to dare anyone to stop them from pursuing nuclear weapons.  So, getting after their conventional capabilities, missile launchers, defense industrial base, their navy was all part of it. Ensuring they can't blackmail us into pursuing a nuclear capability, laser-focused on Iran will never have a nuclear capability – that's the promise the president has made, and that he will keep.

Senator Chris Murphy: Is it still a war objective, either through military action or through a diplomatic agreement to destroy and disable all of Iran's meaningful military capacities, including their missile program?

Secretary Pete Hegseth: As far as all: when we talked about that from the podium at the outset of this, we were talking about their defense industrial base. And if you look at the metrics of their ability to make more, that it's been overwhelmingly destroyed. Not everything, but overwhelmingly. Now, do they have missiles in underground bunkers because they're a terror state? Sure, they do, and we've acknowledged that from the beginning. But their capacity is less today than it's ever been…

Senator Chris Murphy: They obviously, they obviously have significant capacity to effectively disrupt the entirety of the Middle East and oil flows out of the Middle East, and that's not going to change. 


As Senator Tammy Baldwin noted to Hegseth: 

This supplemental request is another example of this Administration's backwards priorities. Instead of spending tens of billions of dollars more for the President's war in Iran, we should be meeting the needs of American families.  We could invest this money to accelerate new cures and treatments for cancer and Alzheimer's disease. Or we could use it to help more families with rising home energy costs. We could use this funding to help more families afford quality childcare. We could use this funding to help more kids get free school lunch. We could use this funding to restore healthcare for working families. We could use this funding to support our public schools and special education. This was a misguided war of choice, and every dollar spent on this war is a dollar not spent helping families afford housing, health care, childcare or groceries at home.




Hegseth sputtered and lied throughout the hearing about the war that no one ever needed.  AP notes:

The U.S. and Iran are back to bombing every day in a bid to control the Strait of Hormuz. And neither is backing down, showing the limitations of President Donald Trump’s reliance on escalating airstrikes to bend Tehran to his will. While the Trump administration says it is open to diplomacy, Iran so far has refused to loosen its grip over the crucial oil shipping corridor in the Persian Gulf. It is raising questions about the strategy for the conflict's next phase. The intensifying attacks have collapsed an interim ceasefire deal, killed more American troops and sent U.S. gasoline prices back up, posing more problems for Republicans hoping to get reelected.

Let's get something straight for Chump and for the media -- stop using "soldiers."  Chump posted "Every time Iran kills an American Soldier they will pay for that killing many times over."  The 18 dead include Cmdr Gabriel Edwards who was not a "soldier" but a sailor since he was in the Navy and the 18 dead include Maj John A. Klinner, Sgt Ashley B. Pruitt and Capt Ariana G. Savino who were not "soldiers"  but  airmen since they were in the Air Force. Marines are not soldiers, they are Marines.  Stop using the term "soldiers" for all members of the US military.  You can use "troops" and you can use "service members" but "soldiers" is not an all inclusive term. 



The war in Iran has entered a bleak new phase.

After weeks of fragile peace and stalled negotiations, the weekend deaths of multiple U.S. service members — coupled with new reporting showing there may be more previously undisclosed injuries — have left White House allies afraid the president is rapidly running out of ways to extricate the U.S. from an unpopular, expensive conflict ahead of the midterms.
“This is what a quagmire looks like,” said one person close to the White House, who was granted anonymity to discuss private conversations.


The Pentagon faces an urgent budget shortfall caused largely by the war in Iran, with some critical lines of funding set to run out within weeks even as President Donald Trump escalates the conflict with Tehran, according to lawmakers and current and former U.S. officials.

The funding crunch is already leading the Pentagon to limit training and maintenance that help maintain military readiness, according to four current and former officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity to candidly describe the budget constraints.
And the collapsed ceasefire with Iran could further strain the military’s budget: After four U.S. service members died during more than a week of intensified fighting, officials in Washington signaled they were preparing for a wider conflict.

The White House has asked Congress for an immediate infusion of $67 billion to help cover the costs of the war, but lawmakers are gridlocked over how to proceed. The House plans to leave Washington on Thursday for a month-long recess, leaving any deal on military funding weeks away at the earliest.
[. . .]
When Hegseth testified before the House panel on defense spending in April, committee leaders urged him to provide information on the war’s costs as soon as possible. The Pentagon later missed the panel’s deadline and has since failed to share requested details for weeks, including the number of precision weapons the military has in its inventories after burning through thousands of munitions in Iran, according to lawmakers and congressional aides.

“We need to know what we’re purchasing and why we’re purchasing it,” Rep. Betty McCollum of Minnesota, the top Democrat on the panel, said in an interview.

Hegseth has at times dismissed concerns about munitions shortages, telling CBS News in an interview last month that U.S. stockpiles were “great, and they’re only getting stronger.”

In private, Pentagon officials have expressed far greater anxiety, according to current and former officials, arguing that the military desperately needs more money to restock munitions needed to deter U.S. adversaries like Russia and China.

Returning to loose lips Hegseth, Tom Boggioni (RAW STORY) reports MORNING JOE's Jonathan Lemire stated on air Tuesday:

During a segment on reports that there are more military casualties in the war than have been publicly announced by the Pentagon, Lemire said all the bad news out of Iran is weighing on the president — and there is no way he will take the blame.

“Secretary Hegseth, you know, he still, I am told, is liked by the president,“ Lemire told co-host Joe Scarborough before adding, “He does not have that many fans in the administration otherwise, that's been the case from the very beginning, from even the transition when he wasn't very truthful with the vetting teams about some of the issues in his past.
“But at least, right now, Trump is still on board. But I am told that if this continues to bog down, whether it's a low-level conflict or a high-intensity resumption of war for months, Trump will eventually look for a fall guy, and it's hard to imagine it being anyone other than Pete Hegseth.”


 If that does happen, don't look for Hegseth to go on to become a leading name in the fitness industry.  Sarah Rumpf (MEDIAITE) notes:

It sounds plausible to say that America has seen Pete Hegseth in a T-shirt and shorts more than any prior Secretary of Defense, but his technique in those workout videos he loves posting would get a flunking grade, according to several military fitness experts interviewed by The Atlantic.
The Secretary of Defense has made physical fitness and appearance a core part of his focus since making the transition from a Fox & Friends Weekend host to leading the world’s powerful military. He’s scolded older officers for getting “fat,” barred troops with facial hair from events, and posted numerous videos of himself working out with members of the military.

One recent video Hegseth posted showed him and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. promoting what they called “The Pete and Bobby Challenge,” which consists of trying to do at least 50 pull-ups and 100 push-ups in under ten minutes.

Video clips of Hegseth and Kennedy went viral, with many commentators mocking Kennedy’s habit of working out in jeans and dissing the whole thing as cringy and awkward.
Hegseth’s form is so bad, multiple military fitness experts said he “fails on form” the service’s tests based on his videos, according to a report by The Atlantic’s Tom Bartlett headlined “Pete Hegseth, You Call That a Pull-Up?”

Bartlett noted that Hegseth and the agency he oversees are the ones recording, editing, posting, and heavily promoting these videos (which he mockingly refers to as “Boot Camp Pete” episodes), and he’s the one who declared strict and harsh judgment was the way to go on military fitness issues.
With each one of these videos, Bartlett wrote, “critics skewer his form and mock his endurance,” dissing him as “all flex and no fundamentals.”



The publication also got feedback on the Pete & Bobby Challenge from Maureen LeBoeuf, a retired brigadier general.

The first and only woman to head the physical education department at West Point said nothing Hegseth did in the video would have counted had she been grading him.
“His pull-ups or chin-ups and the kicking that he does—you would never allow that. You’d stop somebody; you’d say, ‘OK, you’re done,’” she said. “He just keeps kicking, and it’s not a good look.”

Factoring in possible exhaustion, LeBoeuf pointed out the irony of fatigue and cutting corners from someone who is “real big on standards.”
Citing a Marine guide that calls out “poor quality work” that can lead to injury, Bartlett says “Hegseth’s work is, by Marine standards, poor.”


Juan Jairo Coronilla Durán, a 28-year-old Mexican national from San Luis de la Paz, Guanajuato, who died during an immigration enforcement operation by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in St. Augustine, Florida, on July 14, 2026, had a valid tourist visa. A close associate of the family revealed that he had entered the country three weeks ago for a vacation.
The incident occurred when ICE agents encountered Coronilla Durán and three other men during an operation at a gas station near State Road 16 in St. Augustine, Florida. Durán attempted to flee on foot and tried to cross State Road 16, where he was struck by an eastbound tractor-trailer. He later died of his injuries at the scene.
Isaret Jeffers, who is part of an organization supporting Durán’s wife, said he had proper documentation to be in the U.S. Durán had allegedly entered the United States three weeks ago for vacation and had been in Florida for two days. “He was going to return this past Saturday. He had already bought a flight ticket,” Jeffers said in a conversation with the Tampa Bay Times. “Now, unfortunately, if he is returning, his return is different.”
“People are too afraid to go out and do things that used to be normal, like going to the supermarket, taking their kids to the park,” Jeffers said in a statement, referring to the increasing amount of immigrant deaths under the Trump administration. “None of that is happening anymore.”

But ICE continues to waive their guns around.  Even at teenagers.  Dina Arévalo (MY SA) reports:

Days after ICE agents fatally shot two motorists in Houston and Biddeford, Maine, another encounter involving federal immigration agents has left residents in a South Texas town shaken.

On Tuesday, July 14, Samantha Alarcón took to Facebook to share her experience during an ICE operation in Laguna Vista, which is about 10 miles from South Padre Island. Her post quickly gained traction, drawing more than 3,000 shares and 2,000 comments, as she described federal agents wearing face coverings apprehending a young man on a residential street. Agents later released the 18-year-old after determining he was a U.S. citizen.
Alarcón said she was nearly "run off the road" as multiple unmarked vehicles pursued an SUV across narrow, curbless residential streets where the speed limit is 20 mph. Alarcón was with her son when the unmarked vehicles drove past her "with no lights, no logos, and masked men inside." Alarcón told MySA she was forced to veer into the grass as the vehicles sped over speed humps.

In Alarcón's photos, body-worn cameras can be seen on both federal agents and local police officers.

The teen remained in the back seat after the driver and another passenger fled from a vehicle stopped in the driveway of a home. Alarcón alleged in the Facebook post that federal immigration agents entered a neighbor's yard, drew their weapons and pointed a gun at the teen.

Alarcón said she yelled for agents to let the teen go. She wrote in her post, "I screamed at the top of my lungs that he was just a high school kid." Ultimately, the agents did, allegedly asking Alarcón to give him a ride home.
"The drive home broke my heart. This poor young man was sitting in my truck crying in pure, unadulterated fear while talking to his mom on the phone," Alarcón said.



A U.S. Customs and Border Protection officer from El Paso, Texas, appeared in federal court after he was indicted and arrested for charges related to alleged false reporting of an excessive use of force.

Court documents reveal while CBP officer Jesus Espinosa, 52, was acting as a federal law enforcement officer in August 2021, he allegedly used excessive force to detain a person, including using a chokehold that led to the detainee being injured.




Democrats running for office have to face falsehoods from Republicans and from some Democrats as well.  Enter the Hogglette.  Ahmad Austin Jr. (MEDIAITE) reports on David Hogg:

Ex-DNC vice chair David Hogg torched the top campaign arm of the Democratic Party as being “evil” and picking “terrible candidates.”

Hogg reignited his feud with the Democratic establishment this past weekend at the College Democrats of America convention in Washington, D.C. During his remarks, be blasted party leadership for its choice of candidates and declared the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee was inherently “evil.”

“We’re an organization — imagine if there was a non-evil version of the [DCCC] that existed,” Hogg said. “No offense. Like, we need their funding in general elections, but man, they really know how to pick terrible candidates sometimes. But it’s fine. They usually lose.”


The Hogglette couldn't stop crying suuu-eee, suuu-eee.  If he had been able to, he might have been able to have spoken the truth and apologized.  For what?  His new group is Leaders We Deserve and they're supposed to back young progressives.  I don't know that 41 is all that young but they did back a 41 year old this year.  And it was the most infamous 'Democrat.'  It's the one that resigned in disgrace after credible reports of sexual assault, after Nazi tattoos and so very much more.  Yes, that's right, David endorsed Graham Platner. He was one of 9 people running for the state or national legislature that David endorsed. What did David say again?  Oh, that's right, he said, "As our party charts a path forward, Graham Platner represents not the entire solution, but a vital step in the right direction"  The right direction?  Hogg, Platner resigned in disgrace.  The right direction, you said.  Imainge if there was a non-evil version of David Hogg that existed.  Imagine that. 




Turning to Chump's now-dead pal Jeffrey Epstein.  For years, decades, the two were thick as thieves.  At least two meetings took place at the White House in the Situation Room that Chump wasn't present for but in which underlings like then-Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, head of the FBI Ka$h Patel and others plotted and schemed on how to handle a release of the Epstein files in a manner that would cause the least harm to Donald Chump.  That's a conspiracy and everyone in that room should be made to answer for why they were present and how they reconcile their actions in those two meetings with their oaths to the Constitution.  


Emails from Jeffrey Epstein to world leaders indicate he should have registered as a foreign agent, House Judiciary Democrats argue, including messages showing he sought to capitalize on his relationship to President Trump.

In a letter to top Trump administration officials, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) said the communications from the deceased sex offender that have been publicly released show significant conversations that raise “serious questions about the extent to which he wielded his ties to President Trump in dealings with foreign governments.”
Epstein has long come under fire for his significant foreign ties and has been trailed by conspiracy theories he was a spy, accusations Vice President Vance referenced last week in telling podcaster Joe Rogan that the financier surely must have had connections to American and Israeli intelligence at the highest levels. 
The letter from Raskin makes no such claim but argues that even if unpaid, the work performed by Epstein would have required registration under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), as required of all who lobby on behalf of foreign governments.
“We find substantial evidence that Mr. Epstein acted to advance the interests of the governments of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait; advised the government of Russia on how to shape its dealings with President Trump; worked as an ongoing consultant for Ehud Barak, the former Prime Minister of the government of Israel; and repeatedly capitalized on his long-term friendship with President Donald Trump to sign up business from these and other foreign governments and actors in the aftermath of President Trump’s first election, without ever registering as a foreign agent,” Raskin wrote.



In other Epstein news, Lauren Peller and Peter Charalambous (ABC NEWS) report that Alan Dershowitz bailed on the House Oversight Committee Monday, "House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., called it 'unacceptable' Tuesday that attorney Alan Dershowitz failed to appear Monday for a scheduled transcribed interview as part of the committee's probe into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein."  Josh Christenson (NEW YORK POST) adds:

Oversight Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) seethed in a Tuesday letter to Dershowitz that he was attempting to “hide from this Committee’s investigation” into the powerful late pedophile, including of his potential government connections — despite having said he had “nothing to hide” and that he could share relevant details at the scheduled July 20 sit-down.

“The Committee will not tolerate any further delay,” Comer fumed. “Accordingly, we reiterate our request that you testify at an in-person, videotaped transcribed interview on September 2, 2026.
“If you fail to adhere to this request, the Committee will explore all available tools at its disposal, including the use of the compulsory process,” the GOP chairman added.


In other news, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche did not release all of The Epstein Files.  Journalist Katie Phang brought a suit against him over this.  The court sided with Katie but Blanche is refusing to do as instructed.  MORNING HONEY explains:

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche asked a federal judge on Monday to avoid a $1,000-a-day fine, describing a contempt action against him as "absurd."
Blanche is the defendant in a lawsuit brought by independent journalist Katie Phang. 

She claims he violated the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which requires the Justice Department to release files on convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan supported Phang in June. He found that Blanche never challenged her main claims in court: that he missed the law’s deadline, made improper redactions, and withheld documents he was required to provide.

Sullivan ordered Blanche to produce handwritten FBI notes from agents who interviewed a woman accusing President Donald Trump of sexually assaulting her as a minor. 

He also ordered emails to Epstein without redacted sender names and documents naming potential co-conspirators. Phang asked the judge to impose a $1,000-a-day fine until Blanche complied.

In his reply brief on Monday, Blanche called Phang's filings filled with "hyperbolic rhetoric seeking to impose punitive sanctions" and "outlandish claims." 

He referred to her contempt argument as "absurd" and her factual claims as "sensational and unsubstantiated." 


Phang’s ongoing lawsuit is yet another headache for Blanche, whose scheme to secure a permanent promotion to attorney general has not exactly been smooth sailing. After days of tense confirmation hearings in the Senate, an uncomfortable meeting with Epstein survivors, and hundreds of Blanche’s former colleagues opposing his nomination, $1,000 a day just might drive him over the edge.

Katie Phang responds in the video below.


Let's wind down with this from Senator Elizabeth Warren's office:

Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Jim Banks (R-Ind.), along with Representatives Becca Balint (D-Vt.) and Ben Cline (R-Va.), filed a bipartisan, bicameral resolution directing the FTC to investigate serial acquisitions of firetruck manufacturers. 

Following two decades of consolidation by private equity firms and larger manufacturers, a vast majority of the fire truck manufacturing industry is now controlled by just three companies. Since then:

  • Prices have skyrocketed. Fire truck prices have doubled over the last decade, far outpacing inflation for heavy-duty truck manufacturing over that time period. Manufacturers have also exploited their market power to implement “floating” prices, increasing the final price of a fire truck after it goes into production.
  • Manufacturing plants have shuttered. Dominant fire truck manufacturers have restricted supply by closing their own manufacturing facilities, even though demand for fire trucks has increased in recent years.
  • Delivery backlogs are growing. Since 2019, the lead times for fire truck delivery have nearly tripled, and fire departments are now facing delivery delays of up to five years.
  • Working conditions are unsafe. Higher prices and longer delivery times for fire trucks have prevented fire departments from replacing aging trucks, depriving fire fighters of the essential equipment required to work safely and effectively.

Rampant consolidation in the fire truck manufacturing industry is undermining public safety, squeezing fire departments’ budgets, and forcing taxpayers to bear the consequences.

The Federal Trade Commission Act authorizes Congress, through a joint resolution passed by the Senate and House of Representatives, to direct the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to investigate and report the facts relating to any alleged violations of antitrust law. However, Congress has not used this authority to order an FTC investigation since the Great Depression era.

This bipartisan joint resolution would revive that authority and direct the FTC to report to Congress within one year on:

  • The extent of anticompetitive practices and violations of antitrust law in the fire truck manufacturing industry, including price fixing, price gouging, serial acquisitions, and monopolization;
  • The monetary and other harms of anticompetitive practices and violations of antitrust law in the fire truck manufacturing industry on fire fighters, fire departments, states, municipalities, and small businesses; and
  • Recommendations for legislation or other remedial actions.

“When giant corporations and Wall Street investors buy up all the fire truck manufacturers, it’s a threat to public safety,” said Senator Warren. “There’s a growing, bipartisan consensus that Congress must stop a handful of corporations from dominating fire truck manufacturing and making it harder and tremendously more expensive to get fire trucks.”

“Anticompetitive practices are strong-arming our cities, wasting taxpayer dollars, and leaving firefighters without life-saving equipment. I’m proud to join this bipartisan investigation as we fight to put hardworking Indiana taxpayers first,” said Senator Banks.

“Too often, growing delivery backlogs in the fire truck manufacturing industry are leaving fire departments across the Commonwealth and our Nation without the necessary equipment first responders need to do their jobs safely and effectively. This bipartisan resolution takes an important first step to restore competition, strengthen domestic manufacturing, and ensure taxpayers and local fire departments receive fair value,” said Representative Cline.

“Every community deserves to have the fire trucks it needs to keep people safe. But corporate consolidation has driven up prices considerably and left communities waiting years for this essential, lifesaving equipment,” said Representative Balint. “This is yet another example of why we need strong antitrust enforcement: a handful of powerful companies shouldn’t be able to use their power to get richer by making it harder for communities to protect themselves.”

This follows a bipartisan investigation led by Senators Warren and Banks into the harms of private equity roll-ups of fire truck manufacturers that they launched in April 2025.

Senator Warren also sounded the alarm on private equity’s consolidation of the fire truck manufacturing industry at a September 2025 hearing of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Subcommittee on Disaster Management, District of Columbia, and Census.

The International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) and the American Economic Liberties Project (AELP) have endorsed the resolution.

###