Thursday, June 07, 2007

Iraq snapshot

Thursday, June 7, 2007.  Chaos and violence continue, the 3500 mark is passed, what is Turkey doing, and more.
 
The 3500 mark for US service members who have died in the Iraq war was passed yesterday but it takes AP (and others) a little longer to count. ICCC lists the current total as 3504. Don't expect to hear much about it or for it to lead to many pieces (or air time) exploring Iraq -- it's summer so it's time for All Things Media Big and Small to begin their summer breaks.
As with last summer -- or the 'coverage' of the 3,000 mark -- don't expect a great deal.  There's an election!  A cruise!  A summer rental!  And about fifty other 'fun' topics that will yet again grab all the attention. 
 
As media tries to covering their mouths while yawning, the illegal war drags on and it's up to the people to stop it.   Adam Kokesh did and is doing his part and maybe someday someone in little media other than Matthew Rothschild can provide some serious coverage?  That is it, for the record.  The Nation -- when you've got a cruise to pack for, you've got a cruise to pack for!  They can't do everything!  They can't even do one damn thing. But  Adam Kokesh has been standing up.  On Monday, he faced a hearing for engaging in street theater with other members of Iraq Veterans Against the War while he wore fatigues.  The recommendation was to recommend he be issued a general discharge.  Yesterday, his attorney Michael Lebowitz attempted to file an appeal but KMBC reports that the appeal was denied by Brig. Gen. and shrinking violet Darrell L. Moore who also has the "power" to decide whether the recommendation of general discharge goes forward or not.  Dave Helling (Kansas City Star) notes that "Moore can't increase Kokesh's punishment by issuing an other-than-honorable discharge."  Writing to Editor & Publisher, Tom Wieliczka points out that while Kokesh is punished for street theater, General Petey Pace is able to write a letter of support for convicted liar Scooter Libby and no one questions that "the hypocrisy of the military when it comes to the 'grunts' vs the 'generals' when both of them use their first amendment rights."
 
 
The movement of resistance within the US military grows and includes Joshua Key, Ehren Watada, Terri Johnson, Luke Kamunen, Leif Kamunen, Leo Kamunen, Camilo Mejia, Kimberly Rivera, Dean Walcott, Linjamin Mull, Augstin Aguayo, Justin Colby, Marc Train, Robert Zabala, Darrell Anderson, Kyle Snyder , Corey Glass, Jeremy Hinzman, Kevin Lee, Joshua Key, Mark Wilkerson, Patrick Hart, Ricky Clousing, Ivan Brobeck, Aidan Delgado, Pablo Paredes, Carl Webb, Jeremy Hinzman, Stephen Funk, Clifton Hicks, David Sanders, Dan Felushko, Brandon Hughey, Clifford Cornell, Joshua Despain, Joshua Casteel, Katherine Jashinski, Chris Teske, Matt Lowell, Jimmy Massey, Tim Richard, Hart Viges, Michael Blake, Christopher Mogwai, Christian Care and Kevin Benderman. In total, forty US war resisters in Canada have applied for asylum.
 
 
Information on war resistance within the military can be found at Center on Conscience & War, The Objector, The G.I. Rights Hotline, Iraq Veterans Against the War and the War Resisters Support Campaign. Courage to Resist offers information on all public war resisters.
 
 
Turning to the issue of Turkey? Did they or didn't they?  Richard A. Oppel Jr. and Khalid W. Hassan (New York Times) obeserved that the Turkish military was reported to state yesterday that "thousands of soldiers crossed the border [into Iraq] in pursuit of members of the Kurdistan Worker's Party, or P.K.K." but that "American and Turkish officials quickly denied those reports".  Patrick Cockburn (Independent of London) reports that Turkish troops did enter "northern Iraq in pursuit of Kurdish guerrillas" causing the US concern "that its entanglement in Iraq is about to become even more complicated if American troops and aircraf are asked to counter even a limited Turkish assault."  China's Xinhua reports US State Department's flack Sean McCormak declaring, "Bottom line it for you, (I) don't think there's any substance to it.  Our ambassador in Ankara, Ross Wilson, went in and talked to the Turkish General Staff, they said the reports weren't accurate."  Turkish Daily News states the PKK killed 7 Turkish soldiers on Monday and wounded 6 yesterday.  The Turkish Daily News also notes that the country's Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Levent Bilman, declared yesterday that "the Turkish Republic is ready for anything any time."  Lebanon's Daily Star reports that the border crossing happened, quotes a Turkish military official characterizing it as "a hot pursuit, not an incursion," and quotes their third Turkish official stating that "600 commandos entered Iraq and were backed up by several thousand troops along the border.  He said the commandos raided Iraqi territory across from the Turkish border town of Cukurca before dawn after rebels from the Kurdistan Workers Party [PKK] opened fire from Iraqi soil on Turkish patrols." Audio on this topic can be found on Thursday's Flashpoints (KPFA) where Robert Knight covered it in his "Knight Report" at the start of the program noting that Jabar Yawir declared, "This afternoon ten Turkish helicopters landed in a village in Mazouri, which is 2 miles inside the Iraqi border.  They landed with around 150 Turkish special forces."  Scott Peterson (Christian Sciene Monitor) notes the "hot pursuit" reports as well as: "Analysts say news of the raid is a warning to both the US and Iraqi Kurds, nominally in control in northern Iraq, to clamp down on the PKK, which has waged a fight for a homeland in southeast Turkey since 1984. Peterson also notes that ill will is building and cites Metehan Demi ("Ankara bureau chief of Turkey's Sabah newspaper and a military speciailist") noting, "The Americans are not doing things deliberately.  But the Americans are not acting as much as they can [to control the PKK in northern Iraq], according to Turkey. . . .  When any Turkish soldier dies, immediate focus [lands] on the US -- this is the public view, that the US is not acting sincerely for Turkey as an ally."  Patrick Seale (Agence Global via Pacific Free Press) maintains, "Turkey is dangerously close to launching a full-scale war across its eastern border into northern Iraq.  The aim would be to wipe out the bases of the militant Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), destroy once and for all the party's separatist ambitions, and put an end to cross-border terrorist attacks and hit-and-run raids by the PKK, which have inflamed nationalist opinion in Turkey."  The BBC notes the establishment of "temporary security zones" by Turkey "near its border with Iraq, where it has already deployed extra forces."  Vincent Boland (Financial Times of London via MSNBC) notes that troop build up will result in "special security measures in three provinces close to the border with Iraq" and that the approximately "100,000 Turkish troops" have led to "intense speculation that they are preparing for a large-scale incursion."  Suzan Fraser (AP) observes that "temporary security zones" has not been clarified; however, it may mean that "the areas would be off limits to civilian flights.  Others said the zones meant that additional security would be implemented, and entry into the regions would be restricted and tightly controlled" presumably through September 9th which the Turkish military has announced as the projected end date. As the details are discussed and debated, only Patrick Cockburn (Independent of London) notes the upcoming "referendrum . . . to be held on the future of the oil province of Kirkuk before the end of this year."
 
Meanwhile, tensions rise in Iraq as the BBC reports that Iraqi's Islamic Party (Sunni) states that two Sunni Baghdad mosques were attacked by Shi'ite "militiamen, backed by commando troops, [who] raised their banners over the Rahman and Fataah Basha mosques." 
 
Bombings?
 
AFP reports 9 dead and twenty-two injured from a truck bombing in Rabiaa. AFP also reports a bombing in Ramadi that killed 2 people and wounded six  and a Baghdad car bombing ("northwestern Shiite district of Talbiyah") that left 4 dead and fourteen injured.  Hussein Kadhim (McClatchy Newspapers) reports an east Bagdhad car bombing that killed 5 people (fifteen wounded), a Baghdad mortar attack that left 1 person dead and nine more wounded and notes the Baghdad car bombing's death toll had risen to 5 and that it involved two car bombs.  Reuters notes that a roadside bombing outside Tikrit wounded two bodyguards of "a senior pollice officer".
 
Shootings?
 
Hussein Kadhim (McClatchy Newspapers) reports two Iraqi soldiers wounded from gunfire in Baghdad,  Reuters reports 8 "suspected insurgents" were shot dead by Iraqi soldiers.  Sameer N. Yacoub (AP) reports that journalist Sahar al-Haidari was shot dead as she was "waiting for a taxi" in Mosul today: "She was attacked by gunment who pulled up in a car and opened fire" and had worked for Voice of Iraq.  China's Xinhua reports that Sahar al-Haidari used fake names to avoid attacks and that she was mother of three children.
 
Corpses?
 
Hussein Kadhim (McClatchy Newspapers) reports 32 corpses were discovered in Baghdad. Reuters notes 5 corpses discovered in Falluja and 2 in Mahmudiya.
 
The United Kingdom's Ministry of Defence announced today: "It is with much sadness that the Ministry of Defence must confirm the death of a British soldier from 4th Battalion The Rifles, in southern Iraq today, Thursday 7 June 2007.  The soldiers was part of a patrol conducting a search and detention opertaion in the Al Atiyah district, north west of Basra City at about 0220 local time when he was shot by small arms fire."
 
The US military announced today: "A Multi-National Divison - Baghdad Soldier was killed when an improvised explosive device detonated during combat operations in a southwestern section of Baghdad June 6."
 
Turning to political news, rotund talk show host Ed Schultz got a lot of mileage out of trashing Hillary Clinton (something he no doubt did very often before his recent conversion to the 'left') back in January of this year, whining her staff was rude and immediately putting a photo of himself with Barack Obama up at his website -- then going on to trash Hillary regularly. Call it karama, but BuzzFlash has posted an explanation of why their recent wide ranging interview with Randi Rhodes (The Randi Rhodes Show) will not be followed by an interview Schultz: "BuzzFlash.com arranged two interview times with Ed Schultz's producers.  Schultz stood us up for both appointments.  The producer then asked if we would call back next week and he 'might' be able to arrange something.  We responded that, considering the blow offs by Ed and our shortage of time, it was up to Ed to call us on our BuzzFlash interview phone line at his convenience." 
 
Meanwhile, Obama's gotten a ton of attention -- none of it serious -- for a (bad) speech given earlier this week.  Speaking Tuesday at Hampton University (Hampton, Virginia), Obama delivered a speech billed by some as being on the Iraq war, poverty and race.  Strangely, in the long winded speech, Iraq gets three mentions (four if you count "Iraqi") while God and Jesus are mentioned at least 19 times.  On Iraq and US senators and 2008 Democratic presidential candidates, Bob Geary (Raleigh Durham Independent) observes the antics of "those two brave presidential candidates who say they want the war to end" by noting:
 
But Sunday night, Edwards called them out for their lack of leadership on the issue, and he was right. Clinton and Obama finally did cast the "correct" vote, but not until the last possible minute, each apparently waiting for the other to take a stand before finally, with the vote clock running down, Obama entered the chamber and voted no, after which Clinton, rushing in, also voted no.
Until that moment, however, neither Clinton nor Obama had said a word about the bill, what was wrong with it, or that anything was wrong with it or with the Democratic leadership. They are the two leading candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination. Think they might've had some influence over what the Senate bill said if, that is, they'd wanted any influence?
 
In the new issue of The Progressive (June 2007), Ruth Conniff looks at Obama mania, the empty suit behind it (pp. 14-15, "Obama's Kenney Bid") and notes of his highly hyped latest book: "Less inspring, in his best-selling book, The Audacity of Hope, Obama stakes out the middle ground between political poles he describes as right and left 'extremes.'  He associates Rush Limbaugh with one and NPR with the other.  This 'truth is in the middle' canard, designed to appeal to apological swing voters, is depressing for progressives."  And depressing for reality because who but the most Fox-ified right-winger would put out the b.s. that NPR is extreme liberal?  As Conniff observes, he owes a huge debt to "Third Way" and triangulation.  In the Sunday debate, John Edwards (rightly) pointed out that though Clinton and Obama voted "no" to the supplemental, they didn't canvas for it or attempt to build support.  He stated that was not leadership to which Obama whimpered that Edwards was "about four and a half years late on leadership on this issue" as if that would excuse the cowardly behavior by Obama or Clinton.  If Edwards is late to the party, he was present this year.  Where has Obama been?  Ducking outside to have a smoke?  The way he's spent the bullk of his public life after allowing his campaign to unearth trash on his only serious opponent in 2004?  Obama can bore everyone with his double-speak and his 'inspirational' sermonettes, but he's yet to offer the American people anything they couldn't find inside a Hallmark card.  And those giving him a pass on his nonsense aren't helping the Democratic Party.  (Though Katrina's former coffee fetcher's work for the campaign does provide unintentionally hilarious laughs.)
 
In news of contractors, Editor & Publisher's "Documents Emerge Two Years After Col. Westhusing's Controversial Suicide in Iraq" explores the suicide from two years ago of Col. Ted Westhusing whose suicide note ends:
 
I didn't volunteer to support corrupt, money grubbing contractors, nor work for commanders only interested in themselves. I came to serve honorably and feel dishonored. I trust no Iraqi. I cannot live this way. All my love to my family, my wife and my precious children. I love you and trust you only. Death before being dishonored any more.
 
More on Westhusing's suicide can be found at RobertBryce.com.
 
 
In media news, as independent media continues to be under attack, News Dissector Danny Schechter's "Special Blog: Can Our Media Channel Survive?" announces the potential fate of
Mediachannel.org which may shut down: "If we can get 1500 of our readers (that means you) to give $25, we can keep going for another quarter. [PLEASE CLICK HERE TO MAKE A TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATION ONLINE]"
 
 
Finally, independent journalist John Pilger is on a speaking tour with his new book Freedom Next Time and his documentary Breaking the Silence: Truth and Lies in the War on Terror (which looks at DC, Afghanistan and Iraq). Today, June 7th, he will discuss his book with Amy Goodman at The New School, Tishman Auditorium, 66 West 12th Street, beginning at 7:00 pm (doors open at 6:15). Admission is $5 per person and students (with ID) can attend for free. Pilger will sign copies of his book afterwards and Amy Goodman will sign copies of her latest book (written with her brother David Goodman) Static. "For ticket information, contact (212) 229-5488 or boxoffice@newschool.edu. For media inquiries, contact (212) 209-5407 or ruth@nationbooks.org For more information, click here or e-mail pilgerny@gmail.com." He will also be interviewed by Amy Goodman on Democracy Now! Thursday June 7th.

June 11th, Pilger will be in Los Angeles at the Japanese American Cultural and Community Center (244 S. San Pedro St.) and will discuss his book and show his documentary beginning at 7:00 pm (doors open at 6:00 pm). The price of admission to the even is five dollars. "Directions, maps, and parking info at: http://www.jaccc.org/directions.htm
Presented by The Center for Economic Research and Social Change, and The Nation Institute, with support from the Wallace Global Fund. For ticket information, call or visit the JACCC. Box office: 213-680-3700 (Box Office Hours: Monday - Saturday: Noon - 5 pm)
For media inquiries, contact (212) 209-5407 or ruth@nationbooks.org For more information, email pilger.la@gmail.com."

June 13th finds him in San Francisco showing his film and discussing his book at Yerba Beuna Center for Arts (beginning at 7:00 pm, doors open at 6:00 pm) and the price of admission is $15 general and $5 for students. "Presented by The Center for Economic Research and Social Change, The Nation Institute, and KPFA, with support from the Wallace Global Fund. For ticket information, call 415-978-2787 or order online at http://www.ybca.org/. In person tickets at YBCA Box office located inside the Galleries and Forum Building, 701 Mission Street at Third. (Hours: Tue, Wed, Fri, Sat & Sun: noon - 5 pm; Thu: noon - 8 pm.) For media inquiries, contact (212) 209-5407 or ruth@nationbooks.org For more information, email pilgersf@gmail.com."

From San Francisco, he moves on to Chicago for the 2007 Socialism conference. At 11:30 am Saturday June 16th, he and Anthony Arnove will participate in a conversation, audience dialogue and book signing (Arnove is the author most recently of IRAQ: The Logic of Withdrawal) and that evening (still June 16th) at 7:30 Pilger will be at Chicago Crowne Plaza O'Hare (5440 North River Road, Rosemont, IL 60018) as part of a panel of international activists. To attend the conference, the fee is $85. For Saturday and Sunday only, the price is $70. To attend only one session, the cost is ten dollars. "Presented by The Center for Economic Research and Social Change, The Nation Institute, with support from the Wallace Global Fund. Co-sponsors: Obrera Socialista, Socialist Worker, International Socialist Review, and Haymarket Books. For ticket information, call 773-583-8665 or e-mail info@socialismconference.org For media inquiries, contact (212) 209-5407 or ruth@nationbooks.org. For more information, email info@socialismconference.org."

The Socialism 2007 conference will take place in Chicago from June 14-17. Along with Pilger and Arnove, others participating will include Dahr Jamail, Laura Flanders, Kelly Dougherty, Joshua Frank, Amy Goodman, Sharon Smith, Dave Zirin, Camilo Mejia, Jeremy Scahill, Jeffrey St. Clair and many others.
 


Don't get soaked. Take a quick peak at the forecast
with theYahoo! Search weather shortcut.

Adam Kokesh

adam

KMBC's "Marine Loses Appeal In Military Protest Case" offers the latest on Adam Kokesh whose attorney filed an appeal of Monday's ruling/finding/recommendation that Kokesh receive a general discharge. Yesterday, Michael Lebowitz, one of Kokesh's two attorneys, filed an appeal for a new hearing due to the fact that the marines' rules demand only commissioned officers preside over the type of hearing Kokesh had Monday and one of the three member/judges was not a commissioned officer. KMBC reports Darrell L. Moore has "dismissed the appeal." Brig. Gen. Moore will not decide whether to go along with the panel's recommendations or not and is expected to issue a ruling within a week. Lebowitz is quoted by KMBC stating, "I find it unfortunate that Moore has the final say in that decision when he is the one who is in a way directly involved in this case because Adam Kokesh included him in one of his e-mails. That decision shouldn't be left to General Moore; it should be made by an unbiased individual." Brendan notes Dave Helling's "Marine protestor denied rehearing" (Kansas City Star):

Kokesh, a student at George Washington University in Washington, D.C., is scheduled to be separated from the reserves June 18 with his original, active-duty honorable discharge in place.
Under Marine rules, Lebowitz said, Moore can’t increase Kokesh’s punishment by issuing an other-than-honorable discharge.
He can only accept the board’s general discharge recommendation, or reinstate the honorable discharge.


Turning to the issue of politicians, Durham Gal notes Bob Geary's "Profiles in Courage -- and cowardice" (Raleigh Durham Independent):

So what does Congress do? It sends Bush a bill with all the money he asked for and no timetable, because if we put a timetable in it (the cowardly Democrats say) that mean man in the White House would tell everybody we hate the troops.
Yes, he would. That mean, careless (of the troops) and vastly unpopular man in the White House is also determined to keep our soldiers in Iraq until the last dog dies or the oil runs out--or until he starts it up with Iran and then the troops can be in Iraq and Iran.
Permanent bases, after all, were the whole point of Bush's invasion. It was never WMDs, Hillary.
Last week we saw how the House Democrats managed, John Kerry-style, to vote for the blank-check bill before they voted against it. They voted to bring the bill to the floor, that is, with a rule against proposing amendments (read: a timetable). Then, they very bravely voted against the same bill--most of them, but darn it, not quite enough of them to stop the minority Republicans from passing it over their very stern objections. LOL, if you can.
(Kucinich, to his credit, did not assist in this charade. He was one of the handful of Democrats--seven against, seven abstaining--who were actually for ending the war.)
Then, of course, the bill went to the Senate, where the majority Democrats also arranged (with Bush) for an up-or-down vote, blank-check bill or not. Result: Blank-check wins, 80-14! And among the 14 dissenters, those two brave presidential candidates who say they want the war to end, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.
But Sunday night, Edwards called them out for their lack of leadership on the issue, and he was right. Clinton and Obama finally did cast the "correct" vote, but not until the last possible minute, each apparently waiting for the other to take a stand before finally, with the vote clock running down, Obama entered the chamber and voted no, after which Clinton, rushing in, also voted no.
Until that moment, however, neither Clinton nor Obama had said a word about the bill, what was wrong with it, or that anything was wrong with it or with the Democratic leadership. They are the two leading candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination. Think they might've had some influence over what the Senate bill said if, that is, they'd wanted any influence?


Also on the subject of the illegal war and politicians, Charlie notes Ted Rall's "Mission Accomplished" (Boise Weekly):

"Like it or not, we ran out of options," said David Obey, the Democratic chairman of the House appropriations committee. "There has never been a chance of a snowball in Hades that Congress would cut off those funds to those troops in the field." Even Hillary Clinton, one of just 14 senators who voted no, said she'd thought "long and hard" about her vote because she wanted to "do everything we can to protect the troops."
Remember, this isn't about war--it's about logic. Cutting off funding would do nothing to jeopardize U.S. troops fighting in Iraq. That's obvious. It would, of course, endanger the war itself. Without Congressional appropriations, Bush would be forced to bring them home. Which would make them, despite the reductionist and false 2003 GOP talking point that the streets of some U.S. cities are more dangerous than Iraq, safer. A lot safer.
Both parties, with the media playing along, have painted a bleak, transparently ridiculous portrait of besieged American soldiers, surrounded by rabid insurgents. It's The Alamo 2007, or maybe 2008, and our brave young men and women go down, fighting to the last man (or woman) until they run out of ammo, cursing Washington politicians for failing them. Save the last bullet for me, buddy!
It is baffling that this fiction prompted any response from the media, or Democratic pols, beyond dismissive laughter. The fact that it carried the day in a congressional vote, without even a word of comment from national barometer Jon Stewart, stands as testimony to the triumph of what Mike Judge termed "idiocracy."
"Thank goodness we are finally here," Republican Congressman John Boehner said in reference to the Democratic agreement to support the war, "choking up" for C-SPAN. "Three and a half months [the time spent on the debate] to respond to our troops and their families is too long," added his colleague Roy Blunt. What are they talking about? The troops don't need or want the appropriation. They get a paycheck whether they're stationed in Iraq or here in the States. The congressional appropriation in question goes to weapons manufacturers, contracting firms such as Halliburton and Iraqi tribal sheiks in the form of bribes. The troops don't see a cent, much less their families.
What puts our troops in harm's way is the war. No war, no worries. Sure, Iraq falls apart (faster). Sure, Iraqis die (faster). But lost in the malarkey is the brutal truth: Voting for more money for the war means more troops get killed and wounded. Again, there are valid arguments for subjecting them to these risks. But there is no logical basis for the claim that the money will make them safer.


And yet people still attempt to pretend that the supplemental gave any money to US service members. It didn't. Congress didn't have to pass anything. John Edwards suggested sending the same thing back to the Bully Boy. They could have done that. Or they could have done nothing. It would have been the easiest cover: "We voted it. He vetoed it. We did our part, ask him why he didn't want the supplemental." Best thing to do would have been to stand up and say, "No more money for an illegal war." Bully Boy would've had to start bringing troops home.
But there's no bravery in Congressional leadership. Thankfully, we can find elsewhere. Trevor notes Ian Sands' "Faces of Conflict: Marine Corps challenge anti-war vets" (Boston Phoenix):

Each summer, it seems, the Iraq War springs another issue for the peace movement to rally around, symbolized by a specific face with a story to tell. In 2005, it was Cindy Sheehan’s loss and her dogged insistence that Bush explain why we invaded Iraq, where she lost her 24-year-old son. In 2006, it was Lieutenant Ehren Watada’s refusal to deploy. This summer, the latest phase of the movement may be epitomized by two more faces: Marine Corporal Adam Kokesh and Marine Sergeant and Boston-chapter president of Iraq Veterans Against the War (IVAW) Liam Madden, both of whom were honorably discharged from the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR), a group of unpaid reservists that can be, but rarely are, called up. The pair learned this past week that the Marine Corps was recommending they receive “other than honorable” discharges as a result of certain aspects of their anti-war activities.

Mike's father notes Margery Eagan's article on Lisa Hayes (who is not a war resister, just someone who got screwed by the system) from the Boston Herald:

New Hampshire National Guard specialist Lisa Hayes - who’s done two tours of duty in Iraq, a total of 16 months - was, until late yesterday, facingprison time, desertion charges and/or dishonorable discharge because she refused to return to Iraq before settling a custody fight over her daughter Brystal, 7.
[. . .]
"I feel utterly betrayed by the U.S. Military," says Karen Jeffries. She's been like a mother to Lisa Hayes, who has no family of her own. "They always talk about how the children of the troops will be their first priority. And look what’s happened."
Lisa's has been a difficult life, says Jeffries. She was in foster care as a teenager when authorities suspected physical abuse. She found out about her biological father's death when somebody told her "in a grocery store."
After a brief marriage to and divorce from Brystal's father, Lisa Hayes determined "to educate herself and become a professional to care for Brystal the best she could," said Jeffries. When the money ran out, like so many others, she enlisted because the service would help her complete her education.
But within months, Lisa Hayes was in Iraq, her little girl in the custody of her ex-husband. Then this winter, after weeks of trying and failing to reach Brystal or her father, Hayes learned of brawls at her ex-husband's home. The Concord Monitor reported Sunday that the father claimed his live-in girlfriend struck him with a phone, knocked him to the ground, duct-taped his wrists together, then slammed his head into the ground. A court later ruled that leaving Brystal there "would pose an impermissible risk."


Quick note. Some are having trouble with entries being displayed. I don't know what to say on that. There was a snapshot yesterday as well as two brief entries last night. If those aren't showing up, go to the mirror site (where I'll cross-post as soon as this goes up).

Finally, Marcia notes John Catalinotto's "USMC retreats on bad discharge" (Workers World):

The U.S. Marine Corps launched another offensive this May--this one not a landing on some foreign beach but a legal attack on its own anti-war Iraq veterans. Given the results of the first skirmish in Kansas City, Mo., on June 4, the USMC already seems to be deciding that it might retreat rather than find itself fighting another losing battle with a popular army.
Instead of deciding on a less-than-honorable discharge for PFC Adam Kokesh, a board of three Marine officers admitted that military rules shouldn't apply to members of its Inactive Ready Reserve and recommended a "general discharge," barely a punishment. Kokesh will still appeal to get his honorable discharge restored.
The hearing arose following an action by a group of about a dozen members of Iraq Veterans Against the War (IVAW), who performed street theater in a few cities to bring the war home. Dressed not in complete official uniforms, but in outfits resembling uniforms, they acted out the kind of roundups of the civilian population that occur daily in Iraq. Anti-war activists played the role of Iraqi civilians.
It caused quite an uproar to see Marines pushing civilians down on the street, covering their heads with bags, terrorizing them. Someone in the Pentagon must have disliked having it known that Marines in Iraq were acting like Nazi SS troops did in occupied Poland in 1942. The officers decided to take steps to try to stop the veterans from exercising their right to free speech. (See www.ivaw.org for more information and videos.)
Brass try to stop street theater
The USMC brought charges against Kokesh, and charges are pending against Staff Sgt. Liam Madden and Cpl. Cloy Richards, in effect, for speaking out against the war.
While the charges cannot lead to imprisonment, getting a less-than-honorable discharge has serious consequences. Since Richards is disabled, he would lose monthly disability payments and also could lose the free medical care now available to him. The troops could also lose or even be forced to repay educational benefits.
If the Marine Corps succeeds in enforcing less-than-honorable discharges, it could intimidate other veterans. But bringing charges like these in a broadly anti-war atmosphere can also boomerang on the brass.
One surprising result of the Marines' charges is that the Veterans of Foreign Wars, a veterans' group that almost always backs U.S. government policy, made a statement supporting the Marine veterans' right to speech and to protest. This VFW position is a sign of widespread disgust with the Iraq experience, even though the VFW says it backs the war.
The veterans involved acted more angry than intimidated. They went on a special bus covered with anti-war slogans--called the Yellow Rose of Texas Bus for Peace--from Washington to Kansas City from June 1 to 3 and gave interviews to the media all along the way. At each stop they drew more attention to the existence of a solid group of anti-war Iraq veterans. They also said that the Marines who are still on active duty and still in Iraq support them.
Madden, who received an honorable discharge from active duty Jan. 20, was a co-initiator of the "Appeal for Redress" and is known among aware GIs. The "appeal" effectively calls for a U.S. withdrawal from Iraq. Issued first last Oct. 23, it is now signed by nearly 2,000 active-duty troops--60 percent of whom have spent at least one tour of duty in Iraq.
Call for defense committee
Navy Petty Officer Jonathan Hutto, who initiated the appeal with Madden and is now chairperson of the Appeal for Redress Task Force, sent out a statement to active duty troops on May 31 calling for the formation of a defense committee of active-duty troops and National Guard for "Madden and all those within the ranks who face reprisal and/or retaliation from the brass anywhere in the world for speaking out against an unjust war."
The statement notes that the "disloyal statement" Madden is charged with making stems from his saying on a college campus that the U.S. has committed "war crimes" in Iraq.
"Madden maintains he could never be disloyal being he served on the ground in Iraq for seven months and served his country for five years. Furthermore, Madden maintains if the uniform can be worn for imperialist adventures, surely it can be worn for peace and justice," wrote Hutto.
Besides spreading publicity and raising money to support Madden and others, a goal of the defense committee will be to "mobilize a grass-roots movement from the bottom-up calling for an end to retaliation/reprisals, an end to the Iraq War and democracy within the ranks." (www.appealforredress.org)
E-mail: jcat@workers.org
Articles copyright 1995-2007 Workers World. Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved. Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011

Email: ww@workers.org
Subscribe wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Support independent news http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php


The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.





NYT: Ponders Turkey in or not in Iraq

As the rising body count stoked new concerns about how well the troop expansion will tamp down execution-style killings, Iraqi and American officials got a jolt late in the day when reports emerged suggesting that Turkish forces had begun a long-threatened incursion into northern Iraq to hunt Kurdish guerrillas who stage attacks inside Turkey.
The reports, attributed to Turkish military officials, said thousands of soldiers crossed the border in pursuit of members of the Kurdistan Worker’s Party, or P.K.K.
American and Turkish officials quickly denied the reports. Iraq’s foreign minister, Hoshyar Zebari, also said in a telephone interview that while a large force of Turkish troops remained massed on the border, none had crossed into Iraq.
"There hasn't been any Turkish military incursion or operation inside Iraqi territory," Mr. Zebari said Wednesday evening.
Despite the official denials, two news agencies citing sources within the Turkish military continued to report that a limited cross-border attack had taken place.


The above is from Richard A. Oppel Jr. and Khalid W. Hassan's "Bombs Hit Shiites in Baghdad; Turkish Threats Grow Acute" in this morning's New York Times. Anne Flaherty (AP) reports on Lt. Gen. Douglas Lute who has criticized the escalation (Flaherty is only aware of a recent criticism -- his criticism actually goes back to at least 2005) and is a three star general who wants to take the post all the four star generals turned down. The post?

It was called war czar, then they went with war cooridnator and now they are going with
deputy national security adviser. He testifies today and will need confirmation.

And in the continued scandal that was the Congressional supplemental, file it under "And the pork goes on," AP reports that the supplemental (which provides no money for US service members) does include benefits for American and Continental airlines -- "pension relief" --
"End-stage talks on the Iraq war spending bill added a plan to extend relief to American, Continental and other airlines by reducing the money the companies must set aside each year to fulfill their pension obligations. Supporters said similar legislation is already on the books for Northwest and Delta." The Democrats, who refused to say no to the illegal war, were more than happy to stab American workers in the back (again).

The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.