Yesterday afternoon, SCRIPPS NEWS GROUP reported,
"Former Attorney General Pam Bondi will not appear next week for a
scheduled deposition before the House Oversight Committee as part of its
investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, Scripps News has confirmed. A
committee spokeswoman said the Department of Justice informed lawmakers
that Bondi will not appear for the April 14 deposition because she is no
longer serving as attorney general and was subpoenaed in that
capacity." The Democrats on the House Oversight Committee issued the
following:
Washington,
D.C. — Today, Rep. Robert Garcia, Ranking Member of the House Committee
on Oversight and Reform, released the following statement after former
Attorney General Pam Bondi refused to appear for her deposition before
the Oversight Committee on April 14, despite the lawful bipartisan
subpoena the Committee issued last month. This subpoena is binding, even
after she was fired. The subpoena followed the Department of Justice’s
botched release of the Epstein files and the continued White House
cover-up.
“Now that Pam Bondi has been fired,
she’s trying to get out of her legal obligation to testify before the
Oversight Committee about the Epstein files and the White House
cover-up.
Our bipartisan subpoena is to Pam
Bondi, whether she is the Attorney General or not. She must come in to
testify immediately, and if she defies the subpoena, we will begin
contempt charges in the Congress. The survivors deserve justice,” said
Ranking Member Robert Garcia.
###
The
Department of Justice said Wednesday that Pam Bondi will not appear for
her upcoming deposition in the House Oversight Committee’s Jeffrey
Epstein investigation given that she is no longer serving as the US
attorney general.
It marks the latest roadblock
in Congress’ fight to secure Bondi’s sworn testimony related to the
Justice Department’s public release of its investigative files into the
late convicted sex offender.
The
Department of Justice says this? DoJ is now the expert on
Congressional subpoenas? Congress subpoenas someone which makes them
the 'decider' in this matter. The DoJ appears to be overstepping. In
addition, Pam's job has not been filled and she remains, per Chump's
social media post announcing her firing, a government employee -- so
still being paid her AG salary -- for the rest of the month as part of a
"transitioning." Therefore, she's still with the Justice Dept and
she's still being paid her AG salary through the end of the month and
April 14th is in the middle of the month so she could appear before the
Committee as part of her "transitioning."
The
DOJ’s position has drawn criticism from members of both parties on the
Oversight Committee. Representative Nancy Mace (R-SC), who supported the
subpoena alongside Democrats, said Bondi remains obligated to testify
regardless of her current status.
“She was
subpoenaed by name,” Mace said, arguing that leaving office does not
remove the requirement to comply with congressional oversight. Several
lawmakers have indicated they view the issue as a matter of
institutional authority rather than a partisan dispute.
Nancy
Mace is correct, Bondi was subpoenaed by name. She is compelled to
testify or be held in contempt. There was no "Unless you resign or are
fired" exception to the subpoena. So what happens now? Alison Durkee (FORBES) ponders that:
What
will happen next week. It’s unclear if the threat of contempt could
lead Bondi to show up on April 14 as scheduled, and if any GOP lawmakers
would support Democrats in bringing contempt charges against her.
Republicans on the House Oversight Committee said Wednesday they planned
to work with Bondi’s personal counsel to reschedule and have her
testify in her personal capacity. It’s unclear when Bondi could testify,
if it’s rescheduled, and if that would be enough to keep Democrats from
trying to move forward with contempt charges.
Some
Epstein victims expressed anger at Bondi’s intent not to appear.
“Survivors have waited nearly three decades for answers – how much
longer must we wait?” said Maria and Annie Farmer in a joint statement.
“Any further delays only deepen survivors’ pain and weakens our
confidence in the government’s willingness to hold accountable those who
enabled and perpetrated Epstein’s heinous crimes.”
Bondi
does not care about the survivors. She made that clear in February
when she appeared before the House Judiciary Committee and refused to turn around and look at the Epstein survivors who were attending the hearing. The Democrats on the Committee noted this refusal in a press
release they issued:
Washington,
D.C. (February 12, 2026)—Rep. Jamie Raskin, Ranking Member of the House
Judiciary Committee, led Judiciary Committee Democrats in
cross-examining Attorney General Pam Bondi for the damage done to the
Department of Justice (DOJ) under her watch.
Seated
in the audience were survivors and families of late survivors of
Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell’s sex trafficking ring, who were
recognized, with their permission, at the start of the hearing: Theresa
Helm; Jess Michaels; Lara Blume McGee; Dani Bensky; Liz Stein; Marina
Lacerda; Sky and Amanda Roberts, who are the family of the late Virginia
Giuffre; Sharlene Lund; and Lisa Phillips. Bondi ignored Members’ pleas
for her to apologize directly to the survivors for the catastrophic
harm Bondi’s DOJ caused by releasing their information and intimate
details of their abuse. Rather than apologize, Bondi called the question
“theatrics.”
Bondi refused to confront the
Trump DOJ’s botched handling of the Epstein files, which recklessly
exposed survivors and shielded potential criminal co-conspirators.
Rep.
Pramila Jayapal pressed Bondi: “Will you turn to [the Epstein
survivors] now and apologize for what your Department of Justice has put
them through with the absolutely unacceptable release of the Epstein
files and their information?” Bondi said: “I’m not going to get into the
gutter with this woman doing theatrics.”
Rep.
Jayapal asked Epstein survivors to raise their hand if they still
haven’t been invited to meet with Pam Bondi or the DOJ. Every single one
raised their hand.
Rep. Hank Johnson said: “We
have the Epstein victim survivors here today. Rep. Jayapal asked a
simple question. If you would be so kind and honorable as to turn around
and face them and apologize to them for outing them. I mean, how many
lives have been derailed because your Department was either sloppy and
incompetent or willfully trying to intimidate and punish these ladies?”
Bondi again refused to acknowledge the survivors, saying: “Your time is
up.”
Bondi obfuscated and filibustered when asked
by Rep. Jerry Nadler how many of Epstein’s co-conspirators she has
indicted. Rep. Nadler slammed her stonewalling: “The answer to my
question of how many of Epstein’s co-conspirators has she indicted is
zero. You have been the Attorney General for a whole year, and your DOJ
fired the lead prosecutor of this case, sat on evidence this entire
time, and claimed falsely last July that there were no more leads. It
took an act of Congress for you to finally release part of the Epstein
files. And when you did, you included personal information about the
victims while protecting the names of abusers.”
In
response to a question from Rep. Ted Lieu on why she shut down the
investigation into Epstein’s co-conspirators, the Attorney General
deflected and made clear she is only here to defend Trump: “This is so
ridiculous, that they are trying to deflect from all the great things
Donald Trump has done.” Rep. Lieu slammed her non-response: “There are
over 1,000 sex trafficking victims. And you have not held a single man
accountable. Shame on you. If you had any decency, you would resign
right after this hearing concludes.”
Rep. Lou
Correa blasted Bondi for redacting the names of powerful men in the
Epstein files while dangerously exposing victims: “We have to make sure
we tell those predators there is no place for them to hide. And if they
commit the crime, they’re going to fry for it. It starts with showing us
the names of the perpetrators in the Epstein files.”
Bondi
responded with personal attacks when Ranking Member Raskin asked her to
“create a joint task force of the Department of Justice and governors
and state attorneys general and district attorneys across the country to
investigate the crimes that have taken place against [Epstein]
victims.”
In response to a question from Rep. Dan
Goldman, Bondi refused to commit to providing key documents still
missing from the Epstein files production: an 86-page prosecution memo
from the Southern District of New York, and a draft indictment from
Florida against Jeffrey Epstein’s co-conspirators. Bondi’s DOJ is
violating the bipartisan Epstein Files Transparency Act compelling the
unredacted release of these documents.
Rep.
Jared Moskowitz pointed out precisely why the DOJ has covered up the
Epstein files: “Trump’s name appears more times in the Epstein file than
Harry Potter’s name appears in the seven books about Harry Potter.”
Rep.
Deborah Ross probed the Trump Administration’s shameful transfer of sex
offender Ghislaine Maxwell to a lower-security prison where she has
been pampered: “Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein’s co-conspirator
received perk after perk in prison. In July, she had a two-day interview
with your deputy and President Trump’s former defense attorney, Todd
Blanche. Just days after that, Maxwell was transferred from a federal
correctional institution in Florida to a minimum-security camp in Texas,
which she, as a sex offender, would normally be ineligible for at this
new facility. We’ve heard reports that she’s been afforded special
privileges: puppy time, private workouts, personal mail, secretarial
services.” Bondi bizarrely claimed she didn’t know about the prison
transfer that occurred under her watch and falsely claimed that Maxwell
had not been transferred to a lower-security prison.
Rep.
Becca Balint said: “Now, I’ve seen some of the unredacted Epstein
files. And obviously, as you know, President Trump’s name is all over
them. But so are the names of other senior Trump officials. Howard
Lutnick, Secretary of Commerce, John Phelan, the Secretary of the Navy,
and Steven Feinberg, the Deputy Secretary of Defense. These men were
appointed by President Trump to senior positions in his Administration.
All of them have clear and confirmed ties to Jeffrey Epstein.” Bondi
flailed when Rep. Balint pressed her on these ties and why they weren’t a
dealbreaker for the President who hired them anyway.
Amid
all the lies and evasions, Bondi made a rare admission, saying that
Trump’s name “appeared countless times” in the Epstein files.
On Chump's pal Jeffrey Epstein, Shirsho Dasgupta (THE STATE COLUMBIA) reports:
In
his attempts to position himself at the confluence of money and power,
Jeffrey Epstein cultivated myriad relationships among the ruling elite
of the Middle East, according to an extensive Miami Herald review of
several million pages of documents recently released by the U.S. Justice
Department.
From his Palm
Beach and New York mansions and his luxurious apartment in Paris,
Epstein enjoyed a remarkable level of access to sensitive information
like the outcomes of political meetings and the itineraries of Gulf
royals.
The disgraced financier, the Herald
found, regularly corresponded with members of the ruling classes in
Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Yemen and the United Arab Emirates. He invited them
to his properties and gave them business advice - even suggesting to
Saudi palace officials that he tutor the crown prince about the ways of
Wall Street.
He asked that he be given a “small
palace” to live in while schooling the prince and demanded that the
Saudis give him sweeping oversight over the kingdom’s fortunes.
When
Qatar was accused of supporting Al Qaeda and the Islamic State, Epstein
detailed to a Qatari royal a four-point campaign on how the country
could clean up its image. Epstein also intervened on behalf of a Yemeni
billionaire’s son to help him fight murder and rape allegations in
Britain.
[. . .]
Epstein first got acquainted with Yemeni billionaire Shaher Abdulhak in the spring of 2012.
Abdulhak, at the time, was in a fix.
His
son, Farouk, was a suspect in the rape and murder of 23-year-old
Norwegian student Martine Vik Magnussen in London in 2008. According to
the British press, British authorities wanted him for questioning, but
Farouk had fled to Yemen.
Epstein, the records
show, claimed to have facilitated an introduction with British attorney
Lord Ken Macdonald, who had previously served as the top prosecutor in
England and Wales.
Epstein told Abdulhak in a
June 2012 email that he had spoken to Macdonald, who believed that
Farouk could get a reduced charge and be granted bail, records show.
Epstein advised Abdulhak to focus on “what punishment would be
acceptable.”
“I think you are right, something like house arrest, plus charity work,” Abdulhak replied.
Let's
move on over to the terrorist that is Donald Chump, the one who said
he'd take a country back to "the stone age" and "obliterate" the people
living there. Chump sounded like a terrorist and like a lunatic. He
should be removed from office immediately. Yes, Chump being Chump, he
ended up chickening out at the last minute. But that he took it that
far goes to how severe the dementia has become.
He
joined Netanyahu in starting a war of choice and he is now at a point
where the US is much weaker and the government of Iran is much
stronger. Tom Boggioni (RAW STORY) reports:
Donald
Trump claims to have reached a successful but still evolving ceasefire
agreement with Iran, but National Review editor Jim Geraghty has a
different assessment: the president has been completely outmaneuvered
and is poised to capitulate on nearly every significant demand.
According to Geraghty's scathing analysis,
Trump and Iran are describing fundamentally different agreements. The
Iranian proposal includes concessions that represent a catastrophic
setback for American national security interests.
The
Iranian demands include: "Iran's continued control of the Strait of
Hormuz," "Iran's uranium enrichment right should be accepted," and
"Payment of compensation for damages inflicted on Iran."
Again, he lost. Rex Huppke (USA TODAY) notes:
I
don’t mean to sound controversial, but a president shouldn’t be able to
walk away from threatening to wipe out an entire civilization ‒ even
setting a deadline, as if Armageddon is a bloody reality show ‒ and then
carry on like he’s a normal president. Even if Republicans want you to
think it's normal.
In the sweep of less than 24 hours on April 7, Donald Trump went from threatening genocide to agreeing to a two-week ceasefire with Iran, a ceasefire that appears to give the Middle East nation a lot in return for nothing.
Don’t
get me wrong, I’m damn glad he stepped away from mass murder. But let’s
be honest: America can’t continue with this kind of “Look at me, I’m a
crazy former reality show star, tune in to see what I’ll do next?!?”
insanity.
Donald
Trump has lashed out at “fraudsters and charlatans” who he claims are
circulating fake lists of Iran’s ceasefire plan as he tries to put a
positive spin on the war.
In an angry Truth
Social post on Wednesday, Trump claimed that “numerous agreements, lists
and letters” were being sent out by people who had nothing to do with
negotiations between the two countries.
“In
many cases, they are total Fraudsters, Charlatans, and WORSE. They will
be rapidly exposed after our Federal Investigation is completed,” he
wrote, without providing any specifics.
“There
is only one group of meaningful “POINTS” that are acceptable to the
United States, and we will be discussing them behind closed doors during
these Negotiations.”
The tirade came hours
after Trump agreed to a two-week ceasefire with Iran—an abrupt climbdown
from his earlier threat to unleash devastating military strikes if
Tehran failed to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.
Chump gets a revealed as a chump who needs someone to teach him THE ART OF THE DEAL and he lashes out at others. Brad Bannon (THE HILL) offers:
“Trump Net Approval Drops to Record Low.”
That’s the headline from the YouGov story about the new national survey
it conducted last week for The Economist. His overall performance score
comes in at net negative 23 percent, which puts him as deep underwater
as the Great Marianas Trench in the Pacific Ocean. Trump’s ratings have
been in intensive care for months but the controversy over starting a
war against Iran a month ago have put them on life support.
Iran
is a big problem for the president. You don’t need a meteorologist to
know which way the wind is blowing. Americans oppose the war by a 2-to-1 margin.
While Republicans still support the conflict, opposition to his
misguided military misadventure is high in every demographic public
subgroup.
Trump also suffers from a significant
credibility gap. A clear majority of people believe he hasn’t provided
accurate information about the progress of the war. Things could soon
even get worse for the commander in chief if he decides to put U.S.
troops on Iranian ground. Only one out of every six surveyed favor the
use of U.S. ground forces against the Middle Eastern nation.
There
are two reasons why the situation has gone from bad to worse for Trump.
He failed to demonstrate at the onset that Iran was a serious threat to
U.S. national security and the assault weaponized existing public
concerns about his failure to reduce inflationary prices.
His reputation is in tatters on the world stage. Need an example? Sam Meredith (CNBC) reports:
Spanish
Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez on Wednesday joined a chorus of world
leaders welcoming the announcement of a U.S.-Iran ceasefire but issued a
thinly veiled swipe at the Trump administration for having initiated
the hostilities.
"Ceasefires are always good
news. Especially if they lead to a just and lasting peace. But this
momentary relief cannot make us forget the chaos, the destruction, and
the lives lost," Sánchez said in a social media post, according to a
translation.
"The Government of Spain will not applaud those who set the world on fire just because they show up with a bucket."
Sánchez,
who has emerged as one of the European Union's leading critics of U.S.
and Israeli strikes against Iran, called for "diplomacy, international
law and PEACE" to prevail.
I can't imagine any US president in post-WWII era being insulted like that. And from our ally Spain. But this is what Chump has fostered with his attacks and his bullying. He's treated the world as though it doesn't matter and now he's getting the same treatment back.
Steven Erlanger (NEW YORK TIMES) writes this morning:
But the two-week cease-fire leaves the Islamic Republic in place and still in command of the future of the Strait of Hormuz, with Iran’s nuclear stockpile and ballistic missile program unresolved. After Mr. Trump’s declaration of victory, however hollow, it is difficult to imagine a resumption of full-scale war.
For the rest of the world, the war “is starting to look like a military defeat, more serious than Iraq or Afghanistan,” said Bruno Maçães, former secretary of state for European affairs for Portugal.
“The myth of America as all-powerful is important,” he added, “and it’s the basic requirement of a global hegemon to keep the oil flowing, to open up the strait and keep it open. This belief in an all-powerful America that can solve anything is disappearing.”
Keeping sea lanes open for American goods and global trade is one of the few permanent interests the United States has in the Middle East, as well as in Asia.
The war in Iran shut down the strait. Now, the Iranian military is still in control of the passageway and is likely to demand large tolls. “The strategic rationale for the American military presence in the region has taken a huge hit,” said Stephen Wertheim, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment in Washington.
The US looks like a crazed lunatic and a loser thanks to Chump. And Iran? As Charles P. Pierce points out at ESQUIRE:
Iran
walks away with more than it had in the previous agreement it struck
with the Obama administration. Israel is still firing missiles into
Iran, to say nothing of laying waste to half of Lebanon. Iran maintains
control of the Strait of Hormuz. Indeed, the deal turns the strait into
an Iranian tollbooth. I think we’re lucky that Iran doesn’t now own half
of Montana. On the other hand, Pete Hegseth thinks the whole thing
is/was a masterstroke:
This morning, a big day
for world peace. Iran wants it to happen. They’ve had enough. Operation
Epic Fury was a historic and overwhelming victory on the battlefield. A
capital V.
And JD Vance, fresh off canoodling with Viktor
Orbán and still cosplaying Urban II in Budapest, emphasized that the
U.S. is not kidding around this time. No sir. Not us. Uh-uhhh.
June 23rd, Jonathan
Swan and Maggie Haberman's REGIME CHANGE is released. It's about
Chump's second term thus far. The two reporters for THE NEW YORK TIMES
have written "How Trump Took the U.S. to War With Iran"
which is based on their book and which THE TIMES published Monday.
Interesting details in the piece. Most interesting? Tulsi Gabbard, the
Director of National Intelligence, was not present when Netanyahu made
his case for war. We'll note this part because it's been repeated in
the media and it was always wrong:
The
Israelis also raised the prospect of Iranian Kurdish fighters crossing
the border from Iraq to open a ground front in the northwest, further
stretching the regime’s forces and accelerating its collapse.
[. . .]
The
intelligence officials had deep expertise in U.S. military
capabilities, and they knew the Iranian system and its players inside
out. They had broken down Mr. Netanyahu’s presentation into four parts.
First was decapitation — killing the ayatollah. Second was crippling
Iran’s capacity to project power and threaten its neighbors. Third was a
popular uprising inside Iran. And fourth was regime change, with a
secular leader installed to govern the country.
The
U.S. officials assessed that the first two objectives were achievable
with American intelligence and military power. They assessed that the
third and fourth parts of Mr. Netanyahu’s pitch, which included the
possibility of the Kurds mounting a ground invasion of Iran, were
detached from reality.
The
Kurds in Iraq were never going to mount an invasion. As we noted here
repeatedly -- often noting the Talabni's extreme closeness to the
Iranian government -- that was not going to happen. The two ruling
dynasties in the Kurdistan are both close to the government of Iran and
have been for years. Many fools in the US media repeated this claim --
from US anonymice whispers or Israeli anonymice whispers, I don't know
-- and it was never viable.
Back to the article:
When
Mr. Trump joined the meeting, Mr. Ratcliffe briefed him on the
assessment. The C.I.A. director used one word to describe the Israeli
prime minister’s regime change scenarios: “farcical.”
At that point, Mr. Rubio cut in. “In other words, it’s bullshit,” he said.
Mr.
Ratcliffe added that given the unpredictability of events in any
conflict, regime change could happen, but it should not be considered an
achievable objective.
Several others jumped
in, including Mr. Vance, just back from Azerbaijan, who also expressed
strong skepticism about the prospect of regime change.
The president then turned to General Caine. “General, what do you think?”
General
Caine replied: “Sir, this is, in my experience, standard operating
procedure for the Israelis. They oversell, and their plans are not
always well-developed. They know they need us, and that’s why they’re
hard-selling.”
Mr. Trump quickly weighed the
assessment. Regime change, he said, would be “their problem.” It was
unclear whether he was referring to the Israelis or the Iranian people.
But the bottom line was that his decision on whether to go to war
against Iran would not hinge on whether Parts 3 and 4 of Mr. Netanyahu’s
presentation were achievable.
Let's wind down with this from Senator Elizabeth Warren's office:
Washington, D.C. — U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), along with Representative Delia Ramirez (D-Ill.) and Representative Troy Carter (D-La.), pressed the Inspectors General of the Departments of Homeland Security (DHS) and State to open an investigation into the Trump administration’s attempts to deport people to countries they have no ties to.
“We request that your offices evaluate the Trump Administration’s unlawful and costly system of “third-country removals”...Congress and the public deserve answers to better understand the scale of legal violations within this system that was recently ruled unconstitutional,” wrote the lawmakers.
Since President Trump took office for a second time, his administration has deported hundreds of people, including children, long-time U.S. residents, and individuals with no criminal records, to countries they are not from and that were not designated for their removal, which U.S. immigration law only allows in rare circumstances. Deportees are being sent to these countries without proper due process, and in some cases without being provided an opportunity to voice concerns that their life or freedom would be in danger in that third country. To persuade countries to accept deportees, the Trump Administration has used a combination of threats and payments, including paying $32 million to El Salvador, Rwanda, Eswatini, Equatorial Guinea, and Palau.
In September 2025, Senator Warren led over 60 members of Congress in launching an investigation into these practices. Despite the serious implications of third-country removals, both State and Homeland Security have failed to comply with the requests made as part of that investigation.
On February 25, 2026, a federal court ruled that this third-country removal system violates the U.S. Constitution and immigration law. Even so, DHS’s 2025 guidance regarding third country removals — which do not appear to have been updated since the February 2026 court ruling — claim the Department can deport individuals to third countries with no individualized process whatsoever.
Many people first learn that they are being deported to a third country while on the flight overseas. Even when a country has not credibly promised to refrain from torture or persecution, DHS still generally gives individuals only 24 hours’ notice that they will be deported to a particular country, with no guaranteed opportunity to speak with an attorney. To make matters worse, some DHS attorneys have reportedly threatened asylum seekers that they may be deported to third countries in order to pressure them to abandon their asylum claims and accept deportation to their home countries.
Some people deported to third countries have reported torture, arbitrary detention, and forced return to their countries of origin where courts have found they are likely to face persecution, and other human rights violations.
“Such reports cast serious doubt on DoS’s process, if one exists, of verifying the reliability of countries’ assertions that they will not torture or persecute deportees, or transport them onward to other countries where they’re likely to face torture or persecution,” wrote the lawmakers.
Meanwhile, the Administration is continuing to execute third-country deportations. As of early March, ICE had over 500 people in its custody slated for third-country deportations, and DHS signaled that it had its sights on deporting over 8,000 people to third countries.
The lawmakers asked that Inspectors General’s investigation include the administration’s failure to follow due process, negotiations with foreign governments, evaluating the risk of torture and persecution, and the cost of third-country deportations.
Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Patty Murray (D-Wash.), Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Jackie Rosen (D-Nev.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) signed on to this letter.
Representatives Donald Beyer (D-Va.), Yvette Clarke (D-N.Y.), Diana DeGette (D-Colo.), Dwight Evans (D-Pa.), John Garamendi (D-Calif.), Jesús García (D-Ill.), Sylvia Garcia (D-Texas), Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.), Jahana Hayes (D-Conn.), Jared Huffman (D-Calif.), Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.), Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.), Jim McGovern (D-Mass.), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.), Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), Chellie Pingree (D-Maine), and Adam Smith (D-Wash.) signed on to this letter.
###
The following sites updated:
-
How Your Data Is Powering Trump’s Surveillance State57 minutes ago
-
-
Lecrae: Tiny Desk Concert2 hours ago
-
-
Chump will never be presidential6 hours ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Grifter Ed Martin6 hours ago
-
-
-
-
Ignorance and Ignominy21 hours ago
-
-
