Friday, February 20, 2009

Dropping Campbell Robertson off at school

Let's start by explaining majority which isn't a confusing term, or I didn't think it was. A majority is a number that is more than half of a total. For example, if you are assigned 7 math problems and you complete four of them, you can say you did the majority of the problems. If you only complete 3 of them, you did not complete the majority because 3 is not more than 1/2 of 7. It's not even 1/2 of 7. For the very slow-witted, the Campbell Robertsons, let's move very slowly. 3+3=6. 3 is half of six. 3 is not half of 7. 7 is greater than 6.

I hope we didn't move too fast but we most likely did -- at least for Campbell Robertson. In today's New York Times, Robertson files a really bad report entitled "At Trial, Iraqi Calls Shoe-Throwing Payback" which is nonsense on every topic it covers and it covers a lot of topics. Regarding math, he writes, "Mr. Maliki's party, Dawa, holds a solid majority on the councils of Iraq's two largest cities, Basra and Baghdad." In Baghdad, there are 57 seats. Dawa won 27 of them. (For those who need a second source, you can check the numbers in this bad McClatchy article.)

27+27=54. 54 is less than 57. A majority of seats are not held by Dawa in Baghdad.

I am so very sorry that the New York Times apparently needs to hire a math tutor. Are we clear on a majority? Do we need to discuss simple majority or plurality next?

Campbell Robertson's article indicates no one reads at the Times, they just waive things through. (In fairness, Alissa J. Rubin has long demonstrated math isn't her strong point. So any catch wouldn't have been made by her on this topic.)

When someone has so many problems with math fundamentals that they most likely were steered towards Developmental Math in college, I really hate to also tack on a reading list but Campbell makes it necessary by writing:

Right after the election, some Awakening leaders threatened violence when the Iraqi Islamic Party claimed to have swept Anbar's election, as it had in 2005 when most Sunnis boycotted the vote. The leaders toned down their words as early results showed that the former governing party had not done nearly as well as it had said.

That's when the sheiks toned it down? That's when? Not when the US military moved into Anbar to ensure safety, not when the US military met with the sheiks, not when Nouri al-Maliki sent an envoy telling them to tone it down?

Realizing that math tutorials will keep Campbell busy for some time, we'll whittle the required reading list down to one source, the New York Times, and to two articles only: Alissa J. Rubin and Steven Lee Myers' "As Iraqis Tally Votes, Former Leader Re-emerges" and Sam Dagher's "Iraqi Government Aims to Calm Tensions in Anbar Over Allegations of Election Fraud." There are many, many more. The Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post did some great work on this topic, for example. But we'll keep it as simple as possible for Robertson who may not only have math and comprehension issues but also location ones as well. If that is the case, Campbell need not fear embarrassment by asking, "How do I find Washington Post online?" Campbell can instead saddle up to Alissa or Steve and Sam and say, "Hey, I'd really like to read that article you wrote about the sheiks. Could you print a copy up for me." And, Campbell, no one will ever know that you were unable to find it on your own. They will never know. They need never know. It will be our secret. Pinky swear.

And for Campbell Robertson's praise -- it's so upsetting when teacher can't also impart a positive, apparently -- despite the fact that Robertson gets everything so wrong, Campbell thankfully avoided joining in the hot new fad: insisting Kurds are begging for violence and war by maintaining the Iraqi Constitution should be followed. Campbell did not join the other alarmists on that for which we can all be thankful. Campbell also does well in unstructured playtime.

Public television notes. Both programs being airing tonight in most markets. NOW on PBS offers a look at sexual harassment:

A shocking statistic—teenagers are in more danger from sexual predators at their part time jobs than through the Internet. According to one estimate, 200,000 teenagers are assaulted at the workplace each year. It's a vastly underreported phenomenon, but some brave young women are stepping up publicly to tell their stories.
This week, NOW collaborates with the Schuster Institute for Investigative Journalism at Brandeis University to bring you an unprecedented broadcast investigation of teen sexual harassment in the workplace.
In the program, abused teenagers share their own stories with Senior Correspondent Maria Hinojosa. We track their legal journeys to justice, and how the issue impacts hundreds of thousands of teenagers across the country—many of whom don't know how to report workplace abuse, or to even recognize when their bosses cross the line.
This is the first report in a new NOW on PBS beat on women and men in the twenty-first century we call "Life Now."

Late Friday night, NOW should be available online for those who'd like to watch online. On Washington Week, Gwen continues to demonstrate how difficult it is for her -- despite PBS' mandate -- to offer up a panel with an equal number of men and women. Four slots open and yet again Gwen's only been able to find one woman. Jeanne Cummings stands by while Gwen and the boys have a measuring contest. NPR's Tom Gjelten, New York Times' David Sanger and the Associated Press' Charles Babington. (Though who knows what Gwen's packing, smart money is on Charlie as the winner.) This will be available online for streaming Monday afternoon and a transcript will be posted then as well. If you podcast, the show will be available either late tonight or Saturday morning -- podcasts for Washington Week are available at iTunes (for free) in audio or video form (audio downloads faster).


Moving over to broadcast TV (CBS) Sunday, on 60 Minutes:

The Drinking Age
Lesley Stahl examines the debate over lowering the drinking age to 18, a controversial idea embraced by some people and roundly criticized by groups like Mothers Against Drunk Driving. | Watch Video
Kidnapped In Basra
When the Iraqi army regained control of the city of Basra from warring religious militias, it meant peace for the city's war-torn residents and rescue for CBS News producer Richard Butler, who had been held captive there for three months. Lara Logan reports. | Watch Video
The Mascot
A young Jewish boy who fled into the forest after his family was killed by the Nazis was later captured by Nazi soldiers who, not knowing he was Jewish, gave him a little uniform and a gun and made him their mascot. Bob Simon reports. | Watch Video
60 Minutes, Sunday, Feb. 22 at 7 p.m. ET/PT.
60 Minutes Update:
The Kanzius Machine
On Wednesday, Feb. 18, John Kanzius, a retired radio technician who invented a possible cancer fighting machine in his garage, died after a long battle with leukemia. In April 2008, Lesley Stahl reported on Kanzius and his machine, which had been dreamed up while he was battling the side effects of chemotherapy treatment. Experiments building on John Kanzius' research continue. | Video

Ava and I noted Washington Unplugged in "TV: Blustering Boys" and, all week long, I've intended to post the video to the segment with Thomas E. Ricks, author of the new book The Gamble.



Watch CBS Videos Online

Slate's John Dickerson did the interview and anchored last week's show. Bob Schieffer is the regular anchor. Washington Unplugged is CBS News' online program. They do it every Friday. It is made for online. It is not a clip job of CBS reports from other news programs. Also remember that Washington Unplugged streams every Friday afternoon at CBS News. (You can click on either link. Option for streaming is usually on a banner at the top of the page and Washington Unplugged contains archives of previous episodes.)

Last night, Marcia wrote about United Progressives in "United Progressives and other thoughts" and this is their latest press release:



February 19, 2009


Home

Latest News from United Progressives

Survey Results:
Are You A Progressive?

The following information represents results for a survey we conducted between July 2008 and January 2009, Are You A Progressive? A request for people to take it was emailed to more than 50,000 people without any awareness of their political affiliation or preferences. Slightly over 500 people, or 1%, responded. 489 actually completed the survey, and the results have been published below.

We believe that the majority of those who responded felt that they might be progressive, and used this survey as a measure of how they compared with others who support the same positions on issues. It is clearly an indication of where people stand on these issues who believe that they are progressive.

This cannot be considered a scientific survey, because there were no perimeters or guidelines established or methods for insuring a fair sample of American political views. However, because we permitted anyone who had an interest to take the survey, without qualifications or specific targeting of audience, we believe that it is a fair indication of how progressives view themselves as a group.

We welcome any comments.

Survey Issue Positions True False NMI
1 . I oppose war as an instrument of foreign policy and believe in the immediate but responsible withdrawal of all U.S. forces from Iraq. 85.07 8.79 6.13
2 . I believe in holding our leaders accountable to the American people and to Congress through all necessary means, including the impeachment process, when constitutionally justified. 97.96 1.02 1.02
3 . I oppose the further development and/or use of all nuclear weapons. 83.46 11.25 5.11
4 . I believe in treating illegal drug use as a public health issue. 80.78 10.02 9.20
5 . I believe in the rights of the people to access to the commons, such as natural resources, public airwaves, and the technology of the internet, free from interference by corporate agendas. 91.62 3.27 5.11
6 . I believe in single-payer, not-for-profit, universal health care. 82.24 9.00 8.79
7 . I believe in an end to capital punishment. 74.16 17.44 8.40
8 . I believe in the right for all women to make decisions about their reproductive health. 87.39 7.56 5.04
9 . I believe in guaranteed, high quality, public education for all from Pre-K through four years of college. 81.09 10.29 8.61
10 . I believe in limiting political campaigns and elections to public control and financing. 76.47 9.87 13.66
11 . I believe in public control and financing of social security. 82.14 6.72 11.13
12 . I believe in a sustainable future for our planet, our nation and our community, of holding a policy of respect for nature and maintaining an ecological balance between the interests of man and nature. 95.38 2.31 2.31
13 . I believe in a fair and just immigration policy that opens a path to legal status for those working in and contributing to the American society. 86.17 6.12 7.71
14 . I believe in equality under the law for all minorities and same sex couples. 89.76 6.90 3.34
15 . I believe in repealing or improving NAFTA to require the enforcement of human and environmental rights, working conditions and pay scales for workers in all countries. 84.30 5.38 10.31
16 . I support research and investment in renewable energy which effectively uses natural resources such as sunlight, wind, rain, tides and geothermal heat, and which may be naturally replenished. Renewable energy technologies range from solar power, wind power, hydroelectricity/micro hydro, biomass and biofuels for transportation. 98.00 0.67 1.34
17 . I believe in the Precautionary Principle. I believe that products and services must be shown to be sufficiently safe for the general public before any person or corporation can market them. Sufficient testing and time to ensure product or service safety must be required.


Survey Results

Survey Issue Positions True False NMI
1 . I oppose war as an instrument of foreign policy and believe in the immediate but responsible withdrawal of all U.S. forces from Iraq. 85.07 8.79 6.13
2 . I believe in holding our leaders accountable to the American people and to Congress through all necessary means, including the impeachment process, when constitutionally justified. 97.96 1.02 1.02
3 . I oppose the further development and/or use of all nuclear weapons. 83.46 11.25 5.11
4 . I believe in treating illegal drug use as a public health issue. 80.78 10.02 9.20
5 . I believe in the rights of the people to access to the commons, such as natural resources, public airwaves, and the technology of the internet, free from interference by corporate agendas. 91.62 3.27 5.11
6 . I believe in single-payer, not-for-profit, universal health care. 82.24 9.00 8.79
7 . I believe in an end to capital punishment. 74.16 17.44 8.40
8 . I believe in the right for all women to make decisions about their reproductive health. 87.39 7.56 5.04
9 . I believe in guaranteed, high quality, public education for all from Pre-K through four years of college. 81.09 10.29 8.61
10 . I believe in limiting political campaigns and elections to public control and financing. 76.47 9.87 13.66
11 . I believe in public control and financing of social security. 82.14 6.72 11.13
12 . I believe in a sustainable future for our planet, our nation and our community, of holding a policy of respect for nature and maintaining an ecological balance between the interests of man and nature. 95.38 2.31 2.31
13 . I believe in a fair and just immigration policy that opens a path to legal status for those working in and contributing to the American society. 86.17 6.12 7.71
14 . I believe in equality under the law for all minorities and same sex couples. 89.76 6.90 3.34
15 . I believe in repealing or improving NAFTA to require the enforcement of human and environmental rights, working conditions and pay scales for workers in all countries. 84.30 5.38 10.31
16 . I support research and investment in renewable energy which effectively uses natural resources such as sunlight, wind, rain, tides and geothermal heat, and which may be naturally replenished. Renewable energy technologies range from solar power, wind power, hydroelectricity/micro hydro, biomass and biofuels for transportation. 98.00 0.67 1.34
17 . I believe in the Precautionary Principle. I believe that products and services must be shown to be sufficiently safe for the general public before any person or corporation can market them. Sufficient testing and time to ensure product or service safety must be required. 83.00 4.70 12.30

United Progressives
44 Music Square East
#702
Nashville, TN 37203

http://www.unitedprogressives.us

If there's a problem with the above, use the link to read the results in full.

The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.


the new york times
sam dagher
alissa j. rubin
steven lee myers

60 minutes
pbs
 washington week
now on pbs