During the 1980s war between Iraq and Iran, she was embedded with the Iraqi army and filed dispatches from the front lines. Her 1991 exposé of corruption at the Iraqi tax agency led to a minister's dismissal.
Her latest venture -- launching an independent online news site -- offers a snapshot of the present travails of Iraqis who yearned for basic freedoms during years of dictatorship. As Operation Iraqi Freedom draws to a close, Khadum is finding that the brand of freedom the United States ushered in is at best tenuous, at worst a temporary illusion.
That is the opening to Ernesto Londono's "Iraqi journalist sees threats to press freedom" (Washington Post) which is an important story and the one filed from Iraq to read today if you only have time to read one. Londono reports on the climate to the press which became more deadly following the start of the Iraq War and which has become more restrictive with each year of the occupation. New rules are already having an effect (my editorial comment, not Londono's story). It's not just that the US outlets have cut back on their staffs in Iraq (which was never that large to begin with, it should be noted), but it's also these new rules which prevent the kind of coverage you might expect on the elections. Might expect?
Supposedly this elections (voting starts March 5th and ends the 7th) are monumental. The press and the US administration has invested all this meaning in them which, alone, would mean the campaigning would be covered. When you add in that the increase in violence as well as the bannings give it an increased 'timely' quality and news value (conflict is always news), you should expect to read tons of coverage on the campaigning. That's not happening. And it's in part because Nouri's insisting that those covering the elections register with the government. Most outlets rely on Iraqi journalists to be stringers and eyes and ears as well as to be the co- or sole reporter on news reports but many of the Iraqis cannot register as journalists due to threats that might follow as a result of their occupation being known. This has seriously curtailed a great deal of coverage news consumers would otherwise be receiving.
Voting will take place in 16 other countries besides Iraq due to Iraq's large refugee population. Bassel Oudat (Al-Ahram Weekly) reports from Damascus:
Although elections in Iraq will be held soon, so far there has been no real campaigning among Iraqis living in Syria and certainly nothing when compared to the electioneering currently taking place in Iraq itself. The general sense among Iraqi refugees living in Syria is that the political manifestos and candidates in this election are not trustworthy.
The overall electoral atmosphere among the refugees is different from that back home in Iraq itself. Many had expected changes in the electoral process, but their hopes have been dashed. Now, the refugees believe that the forthcoming Iraqi elections may well turn out to be a farce.
Iraqi refugees in Syria have been shocked by the rhetoric accompanying the election law, passed some weeks ago, which allocates seats for refugees living outside Iraq. The passage of this law came hot on the heels of the Iraqi government officially rejecting UN statistics on the number of Iraqi refugees living outside the country, unilaterally estimating the number of refugees in Syria at a meagre 200,000.
Sami Moubayed (Asia Times) offers some details on those vying for office:
Two of the candidates running for parliament, for example, are former football (soccer) champions Karim Saddam and Ahmad Radi, who mesmerized Iraqis in the 1980s with their football skills. They are now challenging each other once again, this time not for goals and trophies, but for a parliamentary seat in Baghdad.
In Karbala, a massive turnout of poor people showed up at a rally for Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki, breaking through security to present him with petitions, knowing that no time is better for ordinary Iraqis to reach out directly to top officials - and have all of their requests answered immediately.
Also last week, during a live television debate between Abbas al-Bayati, a senior member of the prime minister's coalition, and Sabah al-Saidi, a Maliki opponent, yet another surprise took place. Just as the program was coming to an end, Saidi took out a handgun - sending shivers down the spine of all those present at the studio - saying he bought it at one of the old markets of Baghdad for US$3,000.
Candidates are running to become one of the 325 members of Parliament. The Parliament elects the Prime Minister. Technically, the current Parliament and Prime Minister (Nouri) aren't 'in office' -- their terms have expired. Elections were supposed to take place in December and then moved back to January and now March. In Iraq, the process is such that the votes will not be counted for several days or weeks. After the vote tallies are released, the Parliament will be known. However, it could be (could be) weeks before a prime minister is named. The naming could take place quickly. If, for example, State of Law holds a large number of seats and enters into political alliance with other major blocs, Nouri could be re-named prime minister in a matter of days. How likely is that? Well, when you run off all your competition, you make it a lot easier. But naming any prime minister may take much longer. There are new factions and parties and the creation of those may have led to grudges that could be hard to put aside. December 15, 2005, the last Parliamentary elections were held (for only 275 seats back then). The election results were not 'official' until January 20, 2006. (They still weren't certified at that point.) And Nouri, who was not the first choice, was not named as prime minister until April 22, 2006.
Something similar may take place this time around. If it took as long as last time (which most observers -- including at the UN -- do not expect), it would be July before a prime minister was selected. On the subject of the UN, Matthew Russell Lee (Inner City Press) reports on questioning the UN Secretary-General's Special Representative to Iraq, Ad Melkert:
Melkert's main job right now is, like Kai Eide's was in Afghanistan, to try to make national elections appear credible. Inner City Press asked him about barred candidate Saleh Mutlak, who has been told he cannot run for office because he was a member of the Baath party. Mutlak says he quit in 1977, and was only goaded into saying he was still a member.
Melkert called the grounds for exclusion "legitimate," and said the UN only advocates for transparency in the application of the rules, citing Iraq's "Accountability and Justice Law of 2008." While speaking about reconciliation, Melkert said that excluding former Baath party members is similar to what happened in Europe "after the Communist regimes."
While Melkert told Inner City Press that the UN "has a permanent position against the death penalty" -- one that Ban Ki-moon backtracked on during his first day in office, on the subject of Iraq -- when Melkert was asked about the execution of former Baath party members, he replied, "I could not take your point on that, the way you formulated it, so I could not comment further."
Many press reports on the elections today reflect on the 2005 boycott by Sunnis but few note the widespread allegations of voter fraud -- allegations the UN refused to take seriously. Also in 2005, women were to have 25% of the seats in Parliament. 25% is also the number of seats women must hold in the new Parliament. Mariwan Hama-Saeed (Global Arab Network) reports:
Female political candidates warned this week that the constitutional quota guaranteeing Iraqi women parliamentary seats has failed to deliver them real political power.
Five female contenders vying for parliamentary seats in Sulaimaniyah and Baghdad laid out their positions on women’s issues, the economy and education in a rare all-women debate on February 20.
The Sulaimaniyah forum, which was organised by the United States-based International Human Rights Law Institute, included candidates from two secular parties and two Islamic factions.
Last year, provincial elections were held. 14 provinces voted in January 2009. The Kurdish provinces voted in July 2009. The KRG will be voting at the same time as everyone in the national elections (March 5th through 7th). And I need to state that because they've fallen off the radar here. That wasn't intentional. I'd hoped all week to pick them up but other events cried for attention. I told myself I'd grab it in the "I Hate The War" entry and then when I was ready to write that last night, the big news was the judge dismissing the case against KBR due to jurisdiction issues. Michael Busch (CUNY Advocate) reports from the region:
I had entered Iraq overland a week earlier through the border town of Zahko which hugs the Turkish frontier, where I hired Mohammed, a chain-smoking taxi driver, to bring me to the country’s northernmost city of prominence, Dohuk. The journey there begins with a chaotic tangle of dusty, dilapidated roads snaking through mountains and farmland drained of their color by the sun and drought. Any feelings of passing through the bleached landscape of an old photograph soon subside, however, on the approach to Dohuk. Here, the countryside gives way to the most extraordinarily emerald pastures -- electric greens familiar to northernmost Syria -- framed by the gentle slopes of a purple-tinted mountain range to the east. As he tore through at breakneck speed what seemed to be endless waves of lumbering lorries on their way to and from Turkey, Mohammed waved a cigarette out the window, smiling. "Iraq," he said, clearly pleased. "Beautiful."
Dohuk itself offers a glimpse into the Iraq of neo-con wet dreams. The city boasts a rapidly developing infrastructure, street graffiti celebrating Eminem, an American style mega-mall, bustling markets, and the reputation as a safe weekend getaway for vacationing American GIs. Indeed, the groups of troops I saw there were treated like celebrities, unfailingly followed by a paparazzi of young men and women asking for photographs and contact info. Alarmingly, the downtown hotel I checked into featured a large portrait of George W. Bush in its foyer, and the hotel manager -- an Adidas tracksuit-wearing, Raul Julia carbon-copy -- feigned disappointment to learn I was not a distant relative of the former president.
Similar displays of explicitly pro-American sympathies are not as easily found south of Dohuk, but the trappings of a nascent prosperity have taken hold in urban areas throughout the Kurdish controlled north. The imperial splendor of the main road alone that leads into the regional capital Erbil -- miles of magnificently massive, arching light posts hanging over the four-lane highway -- its state of the art international airport, and the formidable bomb-blast walls surrounding the fancy, VIP-only Sheraton hotel, unquestionably announce the city’s ambitious pretensions to twenty-first century regional dominance.
More impressive still, perhaps, the southeastern city of Sulimaniyah -- long considered a free-spirited hotbed of liberalism and resistance to outside influence, not to mention a persistent thorn in the side of Saddam Hussein's regime -- has been tamed by the twin influences of Iranian investment and an American University. All over the city, construction teams frame high-rise office buildings, money-lenders hawk impossibly tall piles of Iranian rials, and young people practice their English in cafes advertising wifi, Red Bull, and "Kan Tucky Fried Chiken."
Yet evidence supporting the arguments that Kurdish Iraq offers a model for the rest of the country to follow in order to achieve peace and stability are largely confined to urban centers, and belied by a number of sobering realities. Chief among them is the violent anarchy destroying any hope for a normal life in the northern cities of Mosul and Kirkuk. Both cities -- the most ethnically and religiously diverse spots in the country -- feature highly combustible mixtures of Sunni and Shia Arabs, Kurds and Turkomen, and a slew of other religious minorities including Assyrian Christian and Yazidi groups. As it happens, both cities also sit astride massive oil deposits, and therefore, not surprisingly, have served as playgrounds for the sometimes violent power struggles between regional Kurdish authorities and the central government in Baghdad. These contests for control have left power vacuums filled by unbridled sectarian violence and mark the cities as virtual no-go zones for outsiders.
As Liz Sly (Los Angeles Times) reports on the extra-legal Justice and Accountability Commission's decision to remove 580 Iraqis from the country's security forces for being alleged 'Ba'athists.' Mohammed Tawfeeq and CNN report on the simultaneous announcement yesterday that 20,000 military officers under Saddam Hussein would be reinstated, "Kurdish lawmaker Mahmoud Othman said al-Maliki was simply trying to secure more votes. 'This contradicts his anti-Baathist election campaign and it is very obvious that he wants to appeal to voters'." Meanwhile Leila Fadel and K.I. Ibrahim (Washington Post) quote the extra-legal commission's Ali Falial al-Lami stating they have proof that banned candidate Saleh al-Mutlaq is a 'Ba'athist.' Apparently, they've forced some more confessions in Iraq yet again or maybe forged some -- didn't Chalabi forge a few documents when he was selling the Iraq War?
And we'll note this issued by the KRG:
Washington, US (KRG.org) - The Kurdistan Regional Government to the US today expressed support for the passage of US House of Representatives resolution 944 calling for steps to be taken to protect religious minorities in Iraq. The reosulution was introduced by Democratic Party Representative for Michigan Gary C. Peters.
The Kurdistan Region is home to a diverse collection of ethnic and religious groups, including Chaldeans, Syriacs, Assyrians, and other Christians, Sabean Mandeans, and Yezidis, Turkmen and Arabs, many of whom have fled violence in other parts of Iraq. Consistent with requests made by the resolution, the KRG has made repeated calls for full adherence to the federal constitution, which has provisions designed to protect these groups.
Mr Qubad Talabani, the KRG’s Representative to the US, said, “The resolution introduced by Congressman Peters reinforces the need for swift implementation of Article 140 of Iraq’s federal constitution, which will put to rest conflicts over Iraq’s disputed territories - issues that have indirectly led to the neglect, and at times, oppression of religious minorities in these areas.”
The disputed territory issue, if left unresolved, has the potential to contribute to the degeneration of the situation in Iraq. As stated in the House resolution, these minority groups “…are caught in the middle of this struggle for control and have been targeted for abuses and discrimination as a result.” Article 140 of the federal constitution was written and approved to solve this situation, as it calls for a referendum by the people within the disputed territories to determine their own destinies. Since the approval of the federal constitution, the KRG has worked to implement Article 140.
In his official floor statement during debate on the resolution today, Congressman Gary C. Peters said: “This resolution calls upon the combined efforts of the United States Government and United Nations to ask the Iraqi Government to protect religious minorities by encouraging free and fair elections, training Iraqi security forces and providing safe places to worship.”
The KRG candidates (not covered in the above) have been on hold as have other topics. For example, among the hearings we attended this week were ones where Don't Ask, Don't Tell was addressed. There hasn't been time for that in the snapshots due to other topics (and the template switch). Hopefully, we'll do something on the topic at Third this weekend. If not, I'll probably pass my notes over to Marcia (who will do a fine job with the topic and covers it regularly at her site). On the template switch. As I noted earlier this week, "You get one." Last night, before I did "I Hate The War," I logged into the e-mail accounts and complaints were again on the language as the s-word was used in full in a headline by Random Notes. The template switch means that the if you're on the permalinks/blogroll, your most recent post title shows. We can't have the s-word. That's not a judgment call on Susan who is an incredible writer. That's just that we have to be work safe here. So she's removed from the permalinks. She is a valuable writer and probably the strongest voice calling out so-called education 'reform' -- strongest voice online to be sure. If you click on "About me," you'll see her blog title on "Following" and can access her site there. We will continue to link to her in entries. Probably not in the next weeks due to the elections and the Iraq Inquiry which is starting back up and due to the Congressional hearings that we're planning to attend. But that's not anything 'wrong' with her. That's I'm just too busy right at the moment. She is a strong writer and remains a strong writer. She does not have a 'filthy' mouth or any other problems. On our end, from the start, we've been work safe. We have to maintain that, there are members who need that because they check the site from work computers.
And this should have already been up. I'm dictating it around links already in. And I didn't realize we needed background so pretend there are links here on the snapshots. Monday the top US commander in Iraq, Gen Ray Odierno, gave a briefing in DC where he noted that the draw down could be slowed. This was a testing the water move (by the administration -- though some want to pretend Odierno was a 'loose canon' acting alone). Wednesday morning's New York Times featured a column by former journalist Thomas E. Ricks (speaking for Michele Flournoy to be sure) advocating for a longer US presence in Iraq. Thursday, it was learned that slowing the draw down was actually a request currently submitted to the administration. That's the background. Jason Ditz (Antiwar.com) observes that Barry O's "soft pullout" just got softer while Michael Hastings (The Hastings Report, True/Slant) takes on Rick's suck up to Australian -- who really needs to take his ass home -- David Kilcullen's assertion that entering stupidly doesn't mean you have to depart stupidly. Hastings observes, "So, if you never leave, there's no worry of acting stupid. Except that you never leave. Which seems kind of stupid, too."
In reply to an e-mail in the public account about what Laura Rozen was referring to at Politico, I don't know. I didn't read her article. A joint-statement about Iraq, bi-partisan? Sounds to me like she was referring to the statement Senators John Kerry and John McCain are releasing (or planning to) on Iraq elections.
Press TV reports that at least 4 are dead when bombs in Baghdad targeted the temporary location for the Finance Ministry today. Reuters notes a Mosul dumpster bombing which claimed 2 lives and left ten people injured and a Mosul car bombing which wounded nine people (three were Iraqi soliders).
TV notes. NOW on PBS begins airing Friday on most PBS stations (check local listings):
Yellowstone National Park and central Idaho to help recover a wolf
population that had been exterminated in the northern Rockies. The gray
wolf relocation is considered one of the most successful wildlife
recovery projects ever attempted under the ; today
there are more than 1,600 wolves in the region. But a debate has erupted
between conservationists and ranchers over the question: how many wolves
are too many?
Last year, the Obama Administration entered the fray by removing for some of these wolves, paving the way for controversial
state-regulated wolf hunts. The move has wolf advocates fuming, with
more than a dozen conservation groups suing the Interior Department to
restore federal protections. On February 26 at 8:30 pm (check local
listings), NOW reports on this war over wolves and implications for the
Staying with TV notes, Washington Week begins airing on many PBS stations tonight (and throughout the weekend, check local listings) and we'll note who joins Gwen around the table this afternoon in the snapshot. Right now? We'll ask a question. Has a president, in the 'modern era,' ever refused to deliver a State of the Union speech? Washington Week, as part of its site redesign and increased web presence provides an answer to that by dipping into the archives and making available a February 2, 1973 installment of Washington Week. You can also view the Webcast Extra for last week's show (or any other show this year or last year) which is an additional segment where Gwen and the guests discuss topics submitted by viewers of the show. Meanwhile Bonnie Erbe will sit down with Karen Czarnecki, Avis Jones-DeWeever, Melinda Henneberger and Tara Setmayer to discuss the week's events on PBS' To The Contrary. Check local listings, on many stations, it begins airing tonight. And turning to broadcast TV, Sunday CBS' 60 Minutes:
Stealing American Secrets
"60 Minutes" has obtained an FBI videotape showing a Defense Department employee selling secrets to a Chinese spy that offers a rare glimpse into the secretive world of espionage and illustrates how China's spying may pose the biggest espionage threat to the U.S. Scott Pelley reports. | Watch Video
Battle Over History
Bob Simon reports on what the Armenians call their holocaust - the 1915 forced deportation and massacre of more than a million ethnic Armenians by the Turks - an event that the Turks and our own government have refused to call genocide. | Watch Video
Lesley Stahl talks to Academy Award best-director nominee Kathryn Bigelow about her award-winning film, "The Hurt Locker." If she's chosen, she would be the first woman ever to win in that category. | Watch Video
60 Minutes, Sunday, Feb. 28, at 7 p.m. ET/PT.
Radio notes. On today's The Diane Rehm Show (NPR -- begins airing on most stations at 10:00 a.m. EST and streams live online at that time), the first hour finds Diane joined by Naftali Bendavid (Wall St. Journal), Eleanor Clift (Newsweek) and Byron York (Washington Examiner) to discuss the week's domestic news, while the international hour (second hour) her panel is composed of Thom Shanker (New York Times), Farah Stockman (Boston Globe) and David Wood (Politics.Daily.com). Remember that the show is also podcast.
The Democratic Policy Committee has a series of videos here and we were going to have them displayed in this entry but the type on them has gone huge since I copied and pasted this morning and I'm dictating this so I'm not at a computer and can't go into HTML to change code.
We may note it on Saturday but if you use the DPC link, they have daily videos you can stream online.
The e-mail address for this site is email@example.com.
the washington post
the asia times
the inner city press
matthew russell lee
global arab network
the los angeles times
the washington post
now on pbs
to the contrary
the diane rehm show