Michael S. Schmidt (New York Times) tries to recap major recent events of the political crisis. In some parts, he's wrong on his chronology, leaves out a key detail, more disturbing -- and blame the paper for this, it's already covered for Nouri which is why it was the Washington Post and NPR -- not the New York Times -- which reported on the February 25th arrests of protesters in downtown Baghdad and the torture of them and the kidnappings of reporters covering the February 25th arrests and their torture. This was by Nouri's forces. To this day, those counting on the New York Times to provide them the truth really don't know what happened. That's not fair to the paper of record. Let me correct that. Readers of the Sunday, February 27th Washington Post discovered Stephanie McCrummen's report and learned that protesters were rounded up, that journalists were kidnapped (at least four) after they were at the protests (covering them) and had gone on to lunch, and all were stating they were tortured and supplying evidence of torture. Readers of the the New York Times?
Well that 'protest' coverage would be the embarrassing nonsense of "We present the protests the way Nouri wants us to" as written by, yes, Schmidt and Jack Healy. Click and chuckle.
Again, the paper covers for Nouri and it always has. It's really more that it's a coward in the face of power. The official reason given by higher ups is that by being 'neutral,' they are able to make requests when, for example, journalists are detained. That's nonsense. Neutrality is not covering up for human rights abuses. Human Rights Watch released a report yesterday entitled [PDF format warning] World Report: 2012 (we noted it yesterday, we'll note it in the snapshot) and that's the main reason that the paper offers an Iraq report today. To minimize the findings by Human Rights Watch. Only 3 paragraphs of the 22 paragraph report address or even allude to the findings. Two of which come half way through the report. Covering for Nouri also means that they mention conflict between Nouri and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan by just mentioning that Erdogan spoke to Iraqi politicians and US Vice President Joe Biden.
Oh, how the New York Times LIES.
They leave out Nouri's public remarks, threatening remarks, and they leave out the Wednesday attack on the Turkish Embassy in Baghdad. And Nouri's remarks and State of Law's that came before the attack on the Embassy.
From the January 13th snapshot:
President Obama and Prime Minister Erdogan spoke by telephone today about issues related to democracy, security and development in the Middle East and North Africa region; this was their first conversation in the New Year. The two leaders discussed recent developments in Iraq and their continued support for an inclusive, partnership government that brings stability, democracy and prosperity to the Iraqi people. They agreed that the U.S. and Turkey should continue to support the legitimate demands for democracy for the Syrian people and condemned the brutal action of the Assad regime. The two leaders discussed Iran's nuclear program and how Iran should engage with the international community in this regard. They agreed that U.S. and Turkish teams would remain in close contact on ways that Turkey and the U.S. can support the democratic transitions underway in the Middle East and North Africa.
From January 15th:
Not content at lashing out at politicians in his own country, Nouri appears determined to expand the political crisis into the entire region. Al Mada notes that Nouri is stating the remarks of Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan will cause a catastrophe. Hyperbole's always been a part of Nouri's make up. Kitabat also notes Nouri's attack on Erdogan and how he accuses Erdogan's call for Iraq to resolve the political crisis as Turkey interfering in Iraq's domestic affairs. You've heard of a pep squad? Well Nouri has a thug squad. And Al Mada reports that State of Law, on Saturday, joined Nouri in attacking Edrogan and the country of Turkey.
After all those public attacks, is it really a surprise that the embassy was attacked with rockets?
And if you're not grasping how much Schmidt's story is nothing but damage control, click here and read Dan Morse's report for the Washington Post. His report also includes reaction to the report from Nouri's spokesperson Ali Hadi al-Moussawi whose comments include, "Their number [protesters in Baghdad's Tahrir Square] is gradually decreasing, and they do not reflect strong opposition to the government."
Of course the number has decreased. Nouri's forces attacked and tortured journalist and organizer Hadi al-Mahdi in February 2011 and then Nouri's forces or his supporters killed Haidi in September. As Jane Arraf reported for Al Jazeera yesterday, Nouri 'supporters' shout down protesters in Tahrir Square. This was one in a series of reports, another recent report was noted in the January 10th snapshot:
Bonnie reminds that Isaiah's The World Today Just Nuts "State of the Union" went up last night. This week on Law and Disorder Radio -- a weekly hour long program that airs Monday mornings at 9:00 a.m. EST on WBAI and around the country throughout the week, hosted by attorneys Heidi Boghosian, Michael S. Smith and Michael Ratner (Center for Constitutional Rights) -- topics explored include an update on Mumia Abu-Jamal, Guantanamo Prison, the murder of Iranian scientists, Occupy Chicago Tribune lawsuit, Bradley Manning, the whistle blower site Honest Appalachi (with Jimmy Tobias as guest -- to interact/submit with the website, you need to install something on your computer first to interact with the site.)
The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.
iraq
aswat al-iraq
the new york times
michael s. schmidt
the washington post
dan morse
al jazeera
jane arraf
cnn
jomana karadsheh
stephanie mccrummen
wbai
law and disorder radio
michael s. smith
heidi boghosian
michael ratner
iraq
iraq
iraq
iraq
iraq
iraq
iraq
iraq
iraq
iraq
iraq
iraq
iraq
iraq