Friday, August 31, 2012. Chaos and violence continue, war resister Kimberly Rivera appeals publicly to remain in Canada, Barack lies that the war is over, the US press whores whatever's left of their name to lie for him, the Telegraph of London (however) reports that British and US forces have killed over 3,000 Iraqis in the last two years alone (no, the war hasn't ended), Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani calls for the security forces to stop the increase in assassinations across Iraq, the UN and Human Rights Watch call out the executions the Iraqi government is carrying out, Jill Stein focuses on real issues in her campaign for the presidency, and more.
Michelle Robidoux: We are calling on the government not to deport this family. We think it's unfortunate that this government and, in particular, the Minister of Immigration [Jason Kenney] has seen fit to intervene in a process that should that should be fair and impartial by putting forward Operation Bulletin 202 which directs immigration officers to red flag the cases of US soldiers like Kim Rivera who are applying for status in this country and to label them criminally inadmissable.
Kim Rivera: If you want to know my biggest fear is being separated from my children and having to -- having to sit in a prison for politically being against the war in Iraq which I had experience in. Without that experience, I know that I would not have come to the decision I had made to leave and also be here in Canada for people to know that experience which I had spoken many of. So the only thing that I guess I can really ask is that all of my legal applications that I applied be considered and my agency application also get a decision. That's pretty much all I have.
Michelle Robidoux: It's a matter of public record that Canada did not participate in the Iraq War, that two motions were passed in Parliament calling on the government to allow war resisters to stay in Canada and that also there have been a number of federal court and federal court of appeal decisions which are upholding the arguments that war resisters have made that they face differential punishment if they're returned to the United States, that they are punished more harshly for having spoken up against the war.
Kim took a great personal risk and did so for what she believed in. Once in Canada, she spoke out when the issue needed her. She didn't try to turn herself into a celebrity. If you ever read her blog on Liveblog (I can't find it there anymore), you know she was focused on her family and on her kids and she was trying to teach them ethics and how to lead a solid life. Kim's someone I would be friends with. She's someone I would make a point to go up and hug when I saw her in church on Sundays. She's a regular person like you or me and that came out in her blog where, like me, she'd write about food or about her kids. And now this woman who was so glad and so grateful to be in Canada and so wanting to become a Canadian citizen may be forced out of the country. Kim is not a person who tried to grab the spotlight. She's just a mother who couldn't live with returning to what she saw in Iraq, couldn't live with herself if she returned. And she also had to make sure that whatever did happen, it kept her family together. Canada was the best possible answer and I just can't believe that Canada's going to force her to leave.
Casey Irvin (Torontoist) explains, "While on leave in 2007, Rivera came to Canada to avoid a second tour of duty in Iraq, a war with which she had become disillusioned. Rivera lives here with her husband and their four children (the two youngest were born in Canada). The family and their lawyers are looking into their options, but Rivera probably faces jail time if she goes back. " Jeanette Torres (ABC News Radio) notes that "Robin Long and Clifford Cornell, two American war resisters deported to the U.S., wound up facing year-long jail sentences because they refused deployment to Iraq." Patty Winsa (Toronoto Star) reports:
On Friday, the quiet Texan spoke out for the first time after learning this week from the Canada Border Services Agency that she had been given a negative pre-removal risk assessment and must leave the country by Sept. 20.
"I'm just a bit overwhelmed. I don't want to face reality. I respect Canada's law. I'm going to take it one step at a time so I don't have a meltdown," said Rivera, who was surrounded by supporters and peace activists. "But it's is very difficult."
Rivera said quietly that she hoped her application for permanent residency status on humanitarian and compassionate grounds, which she made in 2009, would still be considered.
Charmaine Noronha (AP) adds that Kim "stepped away during a press conference Friday when she became visibly upset" and quotes Kim's attorney Alyssa Manning stating, "The 6 percent of (war) deserters who are punished through incarceration include service personnel who have been publicly outspoken about their criticisms of the Iraq war while AWOL. The government has failed to assess that risk that Kim faces and that needs to be considered." Alexandra Posadzki (Canadian Press) continues, "Manning said federal officials failed to consider the fact that Rivera has been outspoken about her opposition to the Iraq war when they evaluated her assessment."
Kim and the man now trying to force her out of Canada, Minister Kenney, have met. Here's a trasncript of the video.
Minister Kenney at the University of Toronto
March 18, 2009
Michelle Robidoux: Hello my name is Michelle Robidoux. This is Kim Rivera.
Kim Rivera: (Shaking his hand) Hi.
Jason Kenney: Hello.
Michelle Robidoux: We're just absolutely desperate and we're just sort of pleading with you. If there's anything you can do to stop the petition. The family has been here for almost two years.
Jason Kenney: Okay.
Michelle Robidoux: She's an Iraq War resister who has refused to fight in Iraq, who has refused to continue to fight in Iraq. And we know that you have the ability to do something to hopefully help this family in distress. They are in considerable distress. We know there's an arrest warrant for her for deporation. She will be arrested when she crosses the border when she's forced out next week. So we're just asking for your intervention. Some compassion for this family --
Pleae call Peter Van Loan, Minister of Public Safety: 1-877-738-3748 or 613-996-7752.
Jason Kenney: Okay. Well, actually, it's-it's the Minister of Public Safety that deals with removals, not me. If you want to send me the particulars on the case . . .
Michelle Robidoux: Absolutely. But the -- the humanitarian situation she's in, she did apply for humanitarian compassionate consideration and we're just desperate trying to --
Jason Kenney: Okay. I'm sorry ma'am because I'm not aware of your particular case because we receive thousands of applications for agency and they're generally dealt with by department officials but --
Michelle Robidoux: She faces deporation next Wednesday.
Jason Kenney: But if you send me the particulars, I will have my office look into it. I'm afraid I'm late for my next thing. Thank you.
Canada's Parliament has adopted two motions calling on the federal government to allow war resisters to stay in Canada. But Minister of Citizenship and Immigration Jason Kenney has publicly labelled Iraq War resisters as "bogus refugee claimants". In July 2010, he issued a bulletin to all Immigration Officers requiring them to red-flag applications that involve US war resisters, labeling them as 'criminally inadmissible'.
Amnesty International Canada and former Immigration and Refugee Board Chair Peter Showler have called for Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) Operational Bulletin 202 to be rescinded because it "fails to recognize that military desertion for reasons of conscience is in fact clearly recognized as a legitimate ground for refugee protection" and it "misstates the law and seeks to intrude on the independence of both IRB members and Immigration Officers."
He told them it wasn't his department in March of 2009. Then he issued orders in 2010 and now he's trying to force Kim out of Canada. Is it his department or not? Is any grown up in the Canadian government or is Kenney just allowed to make up whatever rules he wants?
An upcoming event, next week, in Toronto is planned:
Please attend an emergency community meeting to support U.S. war resister Kimberly Rivera and her family!
WHEN: Wednesday, September 5, 7:00 PM
WHERE: Parkdale United Church, 171 Dunn Avenue, Toronto
WHY: STOP THE DEPORTATIONS!
When Kimberly Rivera saw with her own eyes the devastation of war, and the trauma it inflicts on children and families, she followed her conscience and refused to go back. Instead, she and her husband and their (then) two children came to Canada.
Since that day in 2007, the Riveras have been fighting to live their lives in peace. But despite the widespread support of the Canadian people for U.S. war resisters, and despite two votes in Parliament calling on the government to let war resisters stay, the Harper Government continues to target war resisters for deportation.
Kim and her family - which now includes two children born in Canada - now face deportation on September 20. In the U.S., Kim faces court martial, jail time, and a felony conviction that will follow her for life. All for the "crime" of refusing to participate in the invasion, destruction, and occupation of Iraq.
Kim stood up for peace at great risk to herself. Now we must stand up for Kim, and for other war resisters who face the same struggle. Please join the War Resisters Support Campaign for an emergency community meeting to support the Riveras, and to call on Immigration Minister Jason Kenney to stop the deportation.
Please share this information with your friends and neighbours. We hope to see you there! In peace and solidarity, the War Resisters Support Campaign
While Kim fights for her family, US President Barack Obama fights for re-election. If only Kim Rivera had a pack of Devin Dwyer's to lie and whore for her. ABC News' Devy, still so excited about sprouting pubes, can't be bothered with things like reporting. When not rubbing his fingers in the tangle of his new downy growth and then sniffing his fingers, Devy assumes reporting is transcribing what Barack said and transcribing what Barack's "top aides" told him. There's no attempt at facts, there's not an even attempt to get a response from any of the other presidential campaigns. No, Devy, a response the Romney campaign gave on Wednesday is not what members of the press do when printing new attacks made on Friday. Less fingers on yourself, more attention on your job.
Devy quotes Barack stating, "I told the American people that all our troops would be out of Iraq by the end of" and Devy adds" ." Don't general studies majors learn math?
You'd think since Devy's always got his fingers next to his nose, he could also use them to count. Barack promised -- in those tent revivals that gave the Cult of St. Barack such tingles -- that all troops would be out of Iraq sixteen months after he was sworn in. He was sworn in January 2009. How many months does Devy think is in a year? It's 12, Devy, twelve. So what he promised was 2010. By the first fourth of 2010. Not the end of 2011.
What you did was not reporting, Little Devy, and sorry to drop this in the midst of your horny frenzy, but ALL the US service members have not returned home nor are they all out of Iraq. Earlier this month, when US General Martin Dempsey, Chair of the Joint-Chiefs of Staff, visited Iraq, RTT reported, "More than 225 U.S. troops, seven Defense Department civilians, 530 security assistance team members and more than 4,000 contracted personnel are currently in the office at the Iraqi government's invitation."
is it really that hard for Devin Dwyer to stop self-pleasuring and start reporting? Devy quotes White House spokesperson Jay Carney declaring his "surprise" that GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney did not includ "the 70,000 men and women who are serving in Afghanistan" in his acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention yesterday.
I'm more shocked that a sitting president stood in front of service members today and lied that all US troops were out of Iraq. I'm also appalled that this fact is vanished from the press.
Those deaths are perspective as well and how very sad and telling about the whore class trying to pass itself off as a press corps that they don't have the decency or common sense to even acknowledge those deaths.
The Iraq War has not ended. But when you keep head in the sand (and Devin keeps his hand in his pants), you may miss that. Remember this from Monday's snapshot: "Dar Addustour reports 5 British citizens were arrested in Baghdad yesterday -- they did not have passports or i.d. on them."
Golly gee, why would any British people be in Iraq? The war 'ended,' right?
Three of us went into the event. I had tickets, which were free and which the campaign could barely give away, while back in 2007 Obama had sold out the same venue. We didn't go in so as to spend hours in the hot sun just to hear an Obama speech like the one he'd given the day before in another town which we could have watched on Youtube. Thousands of people did that. We went in to disturb the war.
We wanted to shout. But what could we shout? We were only three. We were not near the front. (I recommend taking 10 to the front of one of these events if you can. You'll own the place.) We would have to be loud and clear. We couldn't mention the kill list which would be like mentioning UFOs to these people. We couldn't mention Social Security because they pretend Obama's not threatening it. We couldn't mention peace because people would think it was a pro-Obama chant. We decided to say this: Get out of Afghanistan! End the sanctions on Iran!
Here's how the Washington Post's blog reported on that:
"Protesters drown out Obama
"Posted by Amy Gardner on August 29, 2012 at 3:58 pm "CHARLOTTESVILLE, Va. — An outdoor political rally erupted into a moment of chaos as protesters drowned out President Obama's speech at a downtown amphitheater here — and then the rest of the crowd drowned out the protesters. It was unclear what the protesters were saying, but several members of the crowd said a few minutes later that they heard 'Get out of Afghanistan!' The shouts prompted a flurry of Secret Service activity, and they also prompted an enthusiastic crowd of more than 7,000 to shut down the protesters with two cacophonous chants: 'Four more years!' and 'O-ba-ma!' Obama couldn't continue for a long moment, but when the noise finally died down, he said: 'I couldn't hear what those young people had to say, but that's good that they got involved.' To the rest of the crowd, he said: 'Don't just chant! Vote!'"
Obama was pretending the crowd was all young people. He'd tried to speak at the University of Virginia which had turned him down, but he gave his speech as if he were there. The crowd didn't shout us down till we'd run out of breath. They were not nearly as fast as Republicans are with their "U-S-A! U-S-A!" In fact, they seemed tremendously proud of themselves when they managed to discover that they could yell "O-BA-MA! O-BA-MA!" Voting, in the pretense of those in power, constitutes more activism than chanting or any other activity. Don't just hold teach-ins, vote! Don't just occupy the square, vote! Don't just risk your life to expose injustice, vote! If Bradley Manning had just voted, that would have been the last full measure of devotion.
As to the flurry of Secret Service activity, an Obama campaign guy started standing next to us, and a mean possibly drunk guy started shoving and threatening us. After various additional disruptions of the war (not the peace) by us, the Obama guy called the local police over who asked us to leave, and asked for our names, etc., to tell them to the Secret Service. The police had earlier refused numerous requests by the Obama staff and volunteers to evict our poster demonstration. The police had mentioned freedom of speech. The local media, as well as the police, were surprisingly decent. The Obama campaigners, on the other hand, would have exiled us all to Gitmo if they'd been able, and if they weren't suffering under the misconception that it's been closed.
Sunday is the second show and her guests will include US House Rep "Eleanor Holmes Norton on the election, Jodie Evans (CODEPINK) from the conventions; El Diario's Erica Gonzalez on Latina politics; author Ariel Levy on books and vaginas." If you missed the first episode of the radio show from the Women's Media Center, you can stream it at the link and, because WMC understands the need for being inclusive, the transcript is here. Realizing that a stream doesn't reach every computer user -- due to platform or connection issues or due to hearing issues -- WMC plans to transcribe each broadcast -- which will also allow for a very strong archive.
Who listened live on Sunday? As Robin noted at the top of her broadcast, "And a special welcome to the international family online from (that I know of) Brazil, Egypt, Germany, India, Italy, Kenya, the Philippines, South Africa, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the pioneering feminists in Kurdistan."
The practice of female genital mutilation continues in the Kurdistan region of Iraq a year after a landmark law banning it went into effect because the Kurdistan Regional Government has not taken steps to implement the law. The Family Violence Law, which went into effect on August 11, 2011, includes several provisions to eradicate female genital mutilation (FGM), recognized internationally as a form of violence against women.
The regional government has begun to run awareness campaigns, train judges, and issue orders to police on the articles of the law dealing with domestic violence. But it apparently has not taken similar steps to implement the FGM ban, Human Rights Watch found. Between late May and mid-August, 2012, Human Rights Watch spoke with over 60 villagers, policemen, government officials, lawyers, and human rights workers in the districts of Chamachamal, Choman, Erbil, Penjwin, Pishdar, Rania, Soran, Shaqlawa, and Sulaimaniya about the problem.
"The KRG parliament took a huge step forward when it passed the Family Violence Law," said Joe Stork, deputy Middle East director at Human Rights Watch. "Authorities now need to begin the difficult process of putting a comprehensive plan in place to implement the law, including informing the public, police, and health professionals about the ban on FGM."
In June 2010, Human Rights Watch issued an 81-page report, "They Took Me and Told Me Nothing: Female Genital Mutilation in Iraqi Kurdistan," which urged the Kurdistan Regional Government, parliament, civil society, and donors to take steps to end the practice. The report described the experiences of young girls and women who undergo FGM and the terrible toll it takes on their physical and mental health. The KRG parliament passed the Family Violence Law in June 2011.
In the recent interviews, Human Rights Watch spoke with more than 20 villagers who had daughters in the age range when FGM is traditionally performed – between ages 4 and 12. Some said they were no longer intending to have the procedure performed on their daughters, as a result of awareness campaigns conducted by representatives of nongovernmental organizations who had visited their villages, but a few said they planned to have the procedure done. None had seen any action or awareness efforts by the government.
"Okay, so there's a law now, so people don't talk about it as much now, but if people in my village or another village want to have it done to their girls, they can easily still do it secretly," said a woman from Rania.
"There is no doubt that Iraq still has a serious terrorism problem, but it also has a huge problem with torture and unfair trials," said Joe Stork, deputy Middle East director at Human Rights Watch. "The lack of transparency around these convictions and executions, in a country where confessions that may have been coerced are often the only evidence against a person, makes it crucial for Iraq to declare an immediate moratorium on all executions."
Human Rights Watch opposes the death penalty in all circumstances because it is unique in its cruelty and finality, and is plagued with arbitrariness, prejudice, and error.
An August 30 statement released by Iraq's parliament said that members of the Human Rights Committee had met on the previous day to discuss "a mechanism for slowing down executions." Members told Iraqi media that they had contacted Justice Minister Hassan al-Shimmari to inquire about concerns expressed this week by politicians and nongovernmental organizations that executions of about 200 prisoners now on death-row were being accelerated in anticipation of the passage of an amnesty law currently before parliament. Al-Shimmari denied these claims.
On August 29, Human Rights Watch spoke with two Justice Ministry officials as well as a guard in a prison run by the ministry and an inmate currently in another facility. All said that hundreds of inmates had begun hunger strikes on August 28 in Baghdad's Taji and Rusafa prisons to protest the recent executions and concern about the alleged plan to accelerate other executions. According to the inmate, guards had told prisoners about such a plan in the days preceding the latest executions. Human Rights Watch could not confirm the existence of such a plan.
Carol J. Williams (Los Angeles Times) notes, "Iraq has long featured in the dubious ranks of the Top Five countries carrying out the most executions each year. In 2011, China led Amnesty's list with executions estimated at more than 1,000, but it also eliminated the death penalty for 13 crimes that previously could draw the ultimate punishment. Iran acknowledged executing at least 360 people, followed by Saudi Arabia with 82 reported executions, Iraq with 68 and the United States 43." The UN News Centre adds:
The United Nations agency tasked with defending human rights voiced renewed concern today over the sudden spate of executions in countries around the world following the recent use of capital punishment in Gambia, Iraq, and South Sudan.
"We urge all States, who have not yet done so, to introduce – or reintroduce – an official moratorium on the use of the death penalty aiming to abolish it," Rupert Colville, spokesperson for the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), declared in a briefing to the press in Geneva.
While Jill Stein continues to focus on issues, Roseanne's campaign can't find any. Part of coverage is analysis and the analysis I'm offering for Roseanne's campaign right now is not positive.
Roseanne's on a one-woman public hatred tour. I'm deeply disappointed in a number of people including one friend who was going to get a rave review for her new show from Ava and I but now we're on the fence about whether or not we're even going to cover it. You do not accuse people of wanting to kill other people, Ellen Barkin. That is disgusting and it is appalling. And you're ensuring that your career in TV will be as dead as your film carreer was when the 90s started. Somewhere, somehow, you and a bunch of other actors forgot the first rule: To have a career, you need an audience. It's fine and dandy to take a polticial stand for something. It's antoher thing to pour on hate and distortions. Clint Eastwood, who I know and do not care for, does not want to kill anyone, certainly not a politician. Ellen Barkin crossed a line.
(And Clint gave a great speech. I would have preferred not to have seen it but I said "Hold on" and stopped dictating to go and stream it since I was stating that Clint would not threaten to kill anyone. Clint gave a great speech. He stumbled once that might not have been intentional. But the speech was great. He wasn't dottering and only the dumb and foolish would say that. What Clint did was steal a page from Jane Fonda. Something we all should do. She is the most effective speaker and one of her standard tricks is to start off nervous, hesitant and, as she speaks, grow more sure in her delivery. That allows the audience to witness a transformation and have it be due to beliefs. In other words, the effective speech sells the beliefs as strength. Clint didn't do as well as Jane -- again, she's the best speaker alive. But he's obviously borrowed a page for her book and, yes, his speech was effective. You can stream it at the Washington Post.) (And on Jane, this week she's blogged about her latest film role.)
Roseanne is doing the same as well. And NBC's not backing her new show. They're making that decision right now. NBC won't back it, none of the networks will. Because she's going beyond political into hateful. To have a career in the performing arts, you're going to need an audience. When you go around trashing people, making up disgusting claims about your peer group (as Ellen did to Clint), you destroy everything. I'm all for taking stands, I'm all for calling out and I can be bitchier than anyone but when you accuse someone of wanting to kill, you've crossed a line and what's really sad is you are so far gone into a world of hatred that you can't even see that. And if you are trying to help Barack Obama, you're hatred Tweeted is of no help to him. It saddles him down with an ugly hatred that his campaign is not engaging in. You desire to pollute the world with hate is harming you, harming your career and harming Barack's chances at re-election. You really need to rethink your actions.
And the hatred of women needs to stop right damn now. This is inexcusable:
Those are only two of the Tweets that are unacceptable. They do not help Barack Obama. They do not help anyone. They are why the basic cable network is now considering dropping Jason Biggs. His film career is over. As a sitcom star, he struck out. (Though he wasn't the problem in that sitcom and was actually funny and appealing.) Now all he has is voice work. When you are on thin ice, Jason, you do not jump and down. Those statements were repugnant and offensive. That you can't grasp that says there is something seriously wrong with you. Maybe it's temporary and you need to get out in the world. Maybe it's something more serious and you need therapy. But there is no excuse for what you have Tweeted -- and it's more than just those two Tweets. You need to stop and you need to stop now. Not only does it hurt Barack, your hero, but Barack will be called upon to apologize for your actions. He may or may not take that step to distance himself. But you are distracting from the campaign. If for no other reason, that should cause you to cease and desist. But, repeating, your comments are offensive and they are sexist. There is not an excuse for them. They need to stop.
Roseanne needs to find her way back to focusing on issues. If she can't, she's accomplishing nothing and hurting the Peace and Freedom Party. She said she was running to raise issues. So, Roseanne, when is your big mouth going to be used to tackle an issue other than smoking pot? Is that all you have? If that is all you have, the Peace and Freedom Party will distance itself from you -- there were already efforts underway to make that happen. How would it feel to be the first presidential candidate whose own party publicly rebukes them?
I noted months ago here that I would not vote for Roseanne because she's governed by fear. I know Roseanne and I like her as a person and as an artist. But I don't back putting fear into the White House or our election cycles. I could end up voting for Jill Stein who continues to run a campaign based on issues. (At this point, my plan is still not to vote for that office.)
After her public speech, I asked her what it's been like trying to convince people that we're at a tipping point in terms of breaking the endless (and fruitless) back-and-forth between the two establishment political parties. She likened her experience to being a "political therapist, helping people get out of an abusive political relationship." There will always be excuses as to why people should continue voting for status quo candidates, why they should stay within the confines of a system that isn't helping them, and in fact may be hurting them.
"The politics of fear has delivered all the things we were afraid of" Stein said.
What's that adage about being insane? Doing the same thing over and over but expecting a different result every time?
Perhaps its time to try something new, before we all lose our minds.
During a series of campaign stops in Maine, Stein gave the keynote address during a Green Party rally in Monument Square. Local Green Party candidates for the state legislature and school board. Stein said it's time to take back people's jobs, their health care and their educations. She said people want to take back their democracy. "It needs fixing at every level," she said. "It won't get fixed ... unless it's challenged." Stein, who lives in Lexington, Mass., has a long history of activism and political involvement outside her work as a doctor. It was during the discussion on the debt ceiling last year that Stein became more involved with the Green Party. She said both political parties made proposals to cut the debt that dismantled programs like Medicare and Medicaid and removed the social safety net. Attached to the Stein ticket as vice president is Cheri Honkala -- a renowned anti-poverty activist based in Philadelphia.
As a mother of young kids and a doctor in a clinic, she saw the epidemic of chronic diseases descend on this generation's children.
"It took becoming a mother to feel the incredible vulnerability of our future, and to take it personally," said Stein.
Diabetes, obesity, ADHD and others were among her biggest concern. Some even hit close to home.
"To learn that we have effectively poisoned our own nest," she said, "not only the air, but the food that we're eating, and that it has fundamentally contaminated the womb, drives home the imperative to protect it all."
It was that realization that became the catalyst for her political career. While she is on target to be on 45 separate state ballots, she recently learned that she will not appear on the Georgia ballot. Georgia has "the most antidemocratic ballot in the country," according to Stein. Instead, she is encouraging a grassroots write-in campaign.
Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein said she recognizes that it's unlikely that a third party can take the White House but at least another presence in the election can turn attention to the voters who are fed up with the current policies of the two major parties.
"We're in at a unique breaking point moment right now," said Stein, during an interview with the Daily Sun. "People are ready to turn that breaking point into a tipping point."
Jill Stein has to work for coverage and is getting it. Roseanne's a household name and the press has a natural interest in her as such but the only press she's getting is about how hateful she's being. It's not highlighting any issues, it's not helping anyone -- including Roseanne. November's not that far away, has she already tossed in the towel and lost interest in her own campaign? Those are tough words. I'd really prefer not to have to write them. But I don't whore for anyone. And Roseanne needs to get her act together. (Cindy Sheehan is not top of the ticket. She is the running mate. But, yes, Cindy is focusing on issues. Roseanne is the distraction. The plan for today was actually to highlight the Roseanne-Cindy ticket with an interview Cindy did but Roseanne's appalling behavior is the story of the day for the Roseanne-Cindy ticket. And it will remain the story of the day until she stops this nonsense and starts talking about issues.)