Saturday, April 18, 2026

Chump's claim of victory explodes in his face as whispers abound over Ka$h Patel's drinking

Yesterday, Chump was claiming victory in his war of choice on Iran.  Didn't work out that way.  No, like most things out of Chump's mouth, this was a lie.  Sarah-Jane Collins (DAILY BEAST) reports:

It took less than 12 hours for President Donald Trump’s latest claims of victory in Iran to blow up in his face, as an Iranian Revolutionary Guard ship fired on a tanker in the Strait of Hormuz early Saturday.

Iran’s military announced that it was against closing the vital waterway and putting it under “strict control” until the U.S. ended its blockade. It was a dizzying reversal after Iranian officials and Trump had said the strait was open to commercial vessels again on Friday.

The 79-year-old president had called journalists with the news of his triumphs on Friday afternoon. In a phone interview, he told USA Today that the standoff over the crucial waterway was “over.”

“It’s over, it’s a great victory,” he said. “We’ve had a great victory and we’re going to finish it off.”

 

The lesson should have been learned years ago.  Chump is a known liar.  He's been one his entire life.  If he makes a statement, present it as "Chump claims . . ."  Not as a fact, never as a fact, until you can verify his claim.  Many in the press didn't learn that lesson as Ben noted late yesterday on MEIDASTOUCH NEWS. 



Scarlett O'Toole (THE IRISH STAR) notes, "News anchor Richard Quest appeared live on CNN on Friday, April 17, to tell viewers the Strait of Hormuz is still closed amid the ongoing Iran war. This is despite the president insisting the strait is open."

He's a known liar and now he has dementia as well.  Alan Rusbridger (INDEPENDENT) observes:


Last week in this space, I suggested that maybe Donald Trump was not quite all there. I would like to revise that opinion. I think he may be what we used to call stark raving bonkers.

I apologise for my use of rather blunt language. A reader cautioned me that the use of such terms was stigmatising of people with mental health issues. Of course, Donald Trump himself would regard this as woke nonsense. Only this week, he used the phrase “NUT JOBS” to describe four former cheerleaders who dared criticise his chaotic and murderous adventure in Iran. Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens and Alex Jones were not only NUT JOBS, but they were also LOSERS with low IQs.

In this spirit, I think Donald Trump would appreciate others using direct speech. So let’s not pussyfoot around talking about his “erratic” or “unpredictable” behaviour. Let’s just say all the signs are that he is positively unhinged.

Let’s consider four episodes this week in which the president’s behaviour was straightforwardly loony.

The first was the Jesus image thing. Let’s say just say this slowly so that the full insanity of what happened can fully sink in. The most powerful political leader in the world posted an AI image of himself dressed up as the son of God, healing the sick.

How narcissistic do you have to be to do such a thing? What kind of delusions of grandeur do you have, what degree of messianic complex or hypomania?

A useful measure of abnormality would be to consider how an averagely well-run business or organisation would deal with a leader who behaved so aberrantly that it became routine for observers to suggest they had lost their marbles.


His mental capacity isn't the only thing he's losing, he's also losing support.  The polls have made that clear.  But so did an appearance last night.  Tom Boggioni (RAW STORY) reports:

Donald Trump's ability to pack arenas is evaporating.

The president who once filled sports venues across the country couldn't even come close to filling a 4,500-seat Arizona church on Friday night, exposing the dramatic erosion of his political momentum.

According to the Washington Post, Trump was the featured speaker at a Turning Point USA rally in Phoenix at Dream City Church. Despite his boast earlier in the day on Truth Social about addressing a "BIG CROWD," the turnout was sparse and underwhelming.

The attendance numbers tell the story. A Turning Point USA spokeperson claimed only about 3,000 people attended — meaning the church was roughly two-thirds full at best. For a president who once commanded arena-sized audiences, the half-empty megachurch represents a stunning reversal.

The demographic breakdown was equally telling, reports the Post. The megachurch was supposed to be a venue for Trump to drum up support among young voters. Instead, he found an audience whose members skewed older and were focused on divisions within their own party.


The only thing more messed up than Chump may be his administration.  Yesterday, THE ATLANTIC published Sarah Fitzpatrick's "The FBI Director Is MIA: Kash Patel has alarmed colleagues with episodes of excessive drinking and unexplained absences."  Jen Psaki spoke with Fitzpatrick about her exclusive last night on MS NOW.



Fitzpatrick's report opens:


On Friday, April 10, as FBI Director Kash Patel was preparing to leave work for the weekend, he struggled to log into an internal computer system. He quickly became convinced that he had been locked out, and he panicked, frantically calling aides and allies to announce that he had been fired by the White House, according to nine people familiar with his outreach. Two of these people described his behavior as a “freak-out.”

Patel oversees an agency that employs roughly 38,000 people, including many who are trained to investigate and verify information that can be presented under oath in a court of law. News of his emotional outburst ricocheted through the bureau, prompting chatter among officials and, in some corners of the building, expressions of relief. The White House fielded calls from the bureau and from members of Congress asking who was now in charge of the FBI.

It turned out that the answer was still Patel. He had not been fired. The access problem, two people familiar with the matter said, appears to have been a technical error, and it was quickly resolved. “It was all ultimately bullshit,” one FBI official told me.

But Patel, according to multiple current officials, as well as former officials who have stayed close to him, is deeply concerned that his job is in jeopardy.



The Atlantic report, published Friday evening, claimed that Patel is known to drink to the point of obvious intoxication at clubs in Washington, D.C. and his home city of Las Vegas, violating FBI conduct standards and potentially leaving the nation’s top law enforcement official vulnerable to coercion or exploitation.

The director’s drinking reportedly angered President Donald Trump, who is famously sober, and whose brother died from alcoholism-related health issues. Trump called Patel after the director was seen chugging beer with members of the victorious U.S. Olympic men’s hockey team to express his displeasure, according to the report.

Sources told The Atlantic that Patel’s alleged conduct at the helm of the FBI has alarmed officials about what would happen if the bureau was needed in a national crisis, such as a terror attack.


Friday’s Atlantic story also stated that Patel has drunk “to the point of obvious intoxication” in public, often at Ned’s in Washington, D.C., and at the Poodle Room in Las Vegas, where he lives. On occasion, the FBI has even reportedly had to reschedule meetings “as a result of his alcohol-fueled nights, six current and former officials and others familiar with Patel’s schedule” told The Atlantic.

In some cases, the director’s FBI security detail had difficulty waking him because he was so drunk. In one incident, the FBI had to use “breaching equipment” of the sort SWAT teams use:

On multiple occasions in the past year, members of his security detail had difficulty waking Patel because he was seemingly intoxicated, according to information supplied to Justice Department and White House officials. A request for “breaching equipment”—normally used by SWAT and hostage-rescue teams to quickly gain entry into buildings—was made last year because Patel had been unreachable behind locked doors, according to multiple people familiar with the request.

The report mentions Patel’s appearance in the U.S. men’s hockey team locker room after its win over Canada in the Olympic gold medal game in Italy. Patel was captured on camera chugging a beer. The scene reportedly prompted Trump to let Patel know he was unhappy with the director’s behavior.


Ka$h Patel.  It's a long list of potential fires Chump's considering -- there's Hegseth, Tulsi Gabbard, Lori Chavez-DeRemer, and Ka$h are just a few of the names.  That's what happens when you nominate unqualified people to posts.  In most cases, they are not able to handle the job.  And that means that they're always in danger of being fired.  

Ka$h has misused government funds and resources on his girlfriend and on his hobby as a hockey nut and he's done a very poor job as FBI director -- one screw up after another, always quick to run to the press with self-congratulations only to have the 'we've done it!' explode in his face.  

Bongino's gone, Bondi's gone.  Ka$h is the last big name in his department and he could be next.

He gets so drunk apparently, per what Fitzpatrick told Jen Psaki, that the FBI had to force open his front door one morning when they couldn't reach him by phone and he wasn't answering his door.  He apparently got blotto drunk and was passed out and unable to awaken on his own.


This is who's running the FBI? 


Ewan Gleadow (RAW STORY) reports:

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) took to Bluesky and suggested an exclusive from The Atlantic would be enough to see Patel removed from his post. He wrote, "Stooge Patel getting sloshed at the 'Poodle Room' in Vegas? You simply cannot make this up!! Too good. Start the clock."

Former Trump administration staffer Olivia Troye, who is running for a Democratic Party House seat nomination in Virginia, added, "Remember when I warned this would happen if Kash Patel became FBI Director? I said he was unfit. He threatened to sue me. Now he is the Director—and it’s happening."

Patel has exhibited erratic behavior, including unexplained absences and what witnesses described as "bouts of excessive drinking" that have alarmed FBI staff, according to Sarah Fitzpatrick's investigation in The Atlantic.


Meanwhile, Ka$h has retained an attorney to sue THE ATLANTIC:

The lawyer FBI Director Kash Patel has enlisted to help him go to war against The Atlantic for a report accusing him of “excessive drinking” is known for several unsuccessful MAGA-aligned lawsuits.

Jesse Binnall represented former North Carolina lieutenant governor Mark Robinson in a failed defamation lawsuit against CNN and also worked on President Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.

“See you in court,” Binnall posted on X following the publication of a Friday report by The Atlantic, which cited sources familiar with Patel, 46, alleging he was alarming officials with excessive drinking, erratic behavior, and unexplained absences. 


So he represented Mark Robinson previously?  The liar who admitted a few weeks ago, that he had lied and CNN was correct in their reporting.  Ka$h went with the attorney no one now wants.  

Ka$h isn't the only one in the administration whose booze consumption has raised eye brows.  Brigid Brown (THE IRISH STAR) reports:

Democrats have been reportedly trolling Pete Hegseth, piggybacking off rumors of him having a drinking problem, which he has vehemently denied.

The most recent attack is a photo of Hegseth with a caption that simply reads, “Vermouth?” referring to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s slip-up when talking about the Iran war and saying the Strait of Vermouth, instead of the Strait of Hormuz. It's not clear where that came from, but the Democrats took it and ran with it.

The photo is meant to be a reaction from Hegseth, that he heard the word Vermouth, and it piqued his interest, for example, him saying, “Vermouth? Did someone mention vermouth?” All joking aside, the Secretary of War has repeatedly and firmly denied having a drinking problem.


Let's wind down with this from Senator Elizabeth Warren's office:

National Labor Relations Board previously charged SpaceX with unlawfully firing employees who spoke up about Elon Musk mocking sexual assault allegations

Senators question whether political interference by or on behalf of Elon Musk undermined enforcement actions at NLRB

Text of Letter (PDF)

Washington, D.C. — U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) opened a new investigation into possible political influence in the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB) decision to drop charges against SpaceX for labor rights violations. Elon Musk, who was previously close allies with President Donald Trump, is SpaceX CEO.

“Given [SpaceX CEO Elon] Musk’s extraordinary financial support for President Trump in the 2024 election, his substantial influence in the Trump Administration and interest in the NLRB’s work as head of [DOGE]...we seek answers to determine if the decision to drop the case may have been based on political considerations rather than the facts at hand,” wrote the senators.

In 2022, allegations of sexual abuse by Elon Musk, SpaceX CEO, became public. In response, Mr. Musk mocked accusers on Twitter with a series of lewd “jokes.” Mr. Musk’s reaction reportedly alarmed some SpaceX employees, who responded with a public letter calling on the company to “[p]ublicly address” and “explicitly separate itself from” Mr. Musk’s behavior. According to the NLRB, SpaceX responded by firing eight workers who had been involved with the letter.

The fired workers then turned to the NLRB for help, filing charges against SpaceX for “commit[ing] an unfair labor practice” by firing the employees while they engaged in “protected concerted activity at work.”

Shortly after President Trump took office, Mr. Musk took over as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), and reportedly took a special interest in the NLRB — an agency that had repeatedly found violations against Mr. Musk’s companies over the years. DOGE reportedly visited NLRB offices and extracted huge amounts of private data from its internal systems, which set off oversight alarm bells in Congress.

Earlier this year, despite there being no changes in the facts of this case or the law, the NLRB announced that it did not have jurisdiction over SpaceX and that the National Mediation Board (NMB) did. The NLRB had previously charged SpaceX with illegally firing workers critical of Mr. Musk. In doing so, the NLRB effectively killed the case, because the NMB’s governing law does not protect the same kinds of concerted activities as NLRB.

“The NLRB’s decision to dismiss the charges on jurisdictional grounds was based on questionable legal reasoning,” wrote the senators.

The NLRB deferred to the NMB’s determination that SpaceX was a “carrier by air” because its rockets travel through the air before reaching space. The NMB -– and by extension the NLRB — also argued SpaceX is a “carrier by air transporting mail for or under contract with the United States Government” because letters sometimes hitch a ride to and from the ISS on SpaceX rockets and SpaceX holds contracts with NASA, which “involve” delivering these letters.

The senators raised concerns given the Trump administration’s record of corruption and allowing former lobbyists and industry insiders to operate as key officials in charge of the executive branch agencies responsible for regulating their former allies.

“By dismissing its case against SpaceX under highly questionable circumstances, the NLRB has added to the cloud of corruption surrounding Mr. Musk and the Trump Administration,” wrote the senators.

The senators asked the NLRB to explain its justification for dismissing the charges against SpaceX, and explain whether the agency communicated with Mr. Musk or his representatives regarding the case by April 29, 2026.

The American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) endorsed this letter.

###



The following sites updated:


Diana Ross Live 2026 🡆 The Best Years of My Life 🡄 Mar 11 ⬘ Sugar Land, Texas

Diana Ross - It's My House

My Song (Too Far Gone) - Cher

Hegseth Screws Trump with 25th Amendment Evidence

P. P. Arnold - Angel of the morning (1968)

The Atlantic: Kash Patel's behavior alarms FBI colleagues; FBI denies report

Fiona Apple - Parting Gift (Official HD Video)

‘Clueless buffoons’: USAID whistleblower reveals true damage DOGE did to critical agency

Sade - By Your Side - Official - 2000

TOP 3 Things Congress MUST DO Next Week

Diana Ross | Remember Me (4K HD)

Dear Caitlyn Jenner, We Do Not Care; Paul Gosar's Drunk as a Skunk, RFK Jr. Is Racist, and More!

Alicia Keys - Girl on Fire (Official Video)

White House in CHAOS After Bombshell Melania and Epstein Allegations and FBI PANICS

Stevie Nicks - Has Anyone Ever Written Anything For You

🚨Melania’s DARK PAST Surfaces as WITNESS TELLS ALL!!

Mary J. Blige - Want Love [Official Video]

Trump Allies Continue to Detach as He Loses Power | Explainer

Carly Simon - Holding Me Tonight (Official Video)

BREAKING: Morale for America's Military TANKS as Trump ABANDONS Service Members Overseas

Belles with Dolly Parton - Son of Jolene (Official Performance Video)

Jack Schlossberg on Trump, Dark Money, and Why He's Running for Congress

Keri Hilson - BAE (Official Lyric Video)

Kara Swisher: Tech Bros, Body Hacking, and the Wellness Industrial Complex | Prof G Conversations

Give Up - Diana Ross

Kennedy Center whistleblower tells all on SHADY Trump admin takeover, $2 million seats near Trump

Olivia Rodrigo - drop dead (Official Music Video)

Trump's 'execution agenda' appealed to SCOTUS: Melber on legal reform, Kevin Liles Intv

Sabrina Carpenter & Madonna: Coachella 2026 'Like A Prayer'


That video got pulled.  Here's another but it's not of "Like A Prayer."





Trump CRASHES OUT on AIR FORCE ONE as IRAN PLAN BACKFIRES!!!

Madonna - I Feel So Free (Official Visualizer)

Trump PANICS as Hormuz STAYS CLOSED!!!

Tyla - SHE DID IT AGAIN (Official Music Video) ft. Zara Larsson

Tracking the Trump family’s business deals and profits in his 2nd term

DIONNE WARWICK - ARE YOU THERE (WITH ANOTHER GIRL) (LIVE FRENCH TV 1967)

Trump PANICS As Iran CALLS HIS BLUFF On Fake Deal

Diana Ross & The Supremes "In And Out Of Love" on The Ed Sullivan Show

Trump Caught Kissing Erika Kirk in Front of Everyone

Sonny & Cher "Living For You" 1966 Promo Film

BOMBSHELL Patel Leak Just EXPOSED THE TRUTH

Sec. Kennedy GRILLED Over Trump’s MENTAL HEALTH

‘What kind of DELUSIONAL reality are we living in?’: Manosphere bros SICK of Trump as MAGA fractures

LAUREN BOEBERT THINKS ENOUGH TIME HAS GONE BY SO SHE’S BACK!

ICE Agent CHARGED With ASSAULT After Minnesota INVASION

🚨Bondi gets INSTANT KARMA after VIOLATING SUBPOENA!!!

🚨 Trump term NEARS COLLAPSE as WORLD CUP Disaster HITS MeidasTouch 6.29M subscribers Join

Friday, April 17, 2026

‘Global LAUGHING STOCK’: Nicolle STINGS Hegseth for reciting FAKE BIBLE VERSE at prayer service

Why Trump’s Delusions Are So Dangerous: Therapist | The Daily Beast Podcast

Paranoid freak-out, excessive drinking: Report describes erratic Kash Patel leading FBI

Trump gives DISASTER SPEECH before SILENT CROWD…in PHOENIX!!

Trump DESTROYED by GLOBAL REBUKE He DIDN'T SEE COMING

Pentagon defends Hegseth's use of 'Pulp Fiction prayer'

'He's so out of touch': Fmr. Sen. Boxer reacts to Trump's 'corner store' comment

Trump DOJ TARGETS KEY Rights in SHOCKING New Move

Did JD Vance Just Blow Up His 2028 Run? | Pivot

Trump in TERROR as IMPEACHMENT GETS PREPARED!!!!

MAGA Mike SHUTS DOWN Vote as Trump LOSES TRILLIONS?!!!

EMBARRASSMENT in store for Trump attending event set to honor Epstein reporting

Sen. Duckworth: "I'm here to call bullshit on the President of the United States."

How Trump Is Spectacularly Self-Sabotaging | The Daily Beast Podcast Livestream

RFK Jr. NEEDS To Be Stopped

THEY WANT A SOFT LANDING… I SAY H£LL NO!

Trump Lets It Slip and Stuns Everyone

Trump Gives Iran EVERYTHING in Negotiations as Americans are FURIOUS

Senator WARNS ME About NEW Trump ELECTION THREAT…

Ain’t This DoorDash Grandma???

🚨RFK JR CRACKS under CROSS EXAM at HEARING!!!

They Are Not Properly Feeding The Brave Soldiers That Are Risking Their Lives For This Country!!

Fox News COLLAPSES ON AIR as Trump HITS LOWEST in HISTORY!!!!

Jesus now blasphemed every day in the WH: Joe appalled by reciting of film adaptation of Bible verse

Trump FULLY SURRENDERS to Iran giving them HORMUZ FOREVER!!!

 

The Snapshot

Friday, April 17, 2026.  Chump continues to destroy the economy, US service members on ships are not getting quality meals or enough to eat, Senator Patty Murray demanded to know the cost of this war, CNN analyzes Jeffrey Epstein with the help of a former profiler and former prosecutor, Minnesota stands up for its citizens yet again, and much more.


The economy is not good.  Laura Boast (MONEYWISE) notes:

Now the U.S. and Israel’s war in Iran is expected to make inflation worse, according to a report published by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in March 2026 (6).
The OECD predicts that America could have the highest inflation in the G7 by the end of this year, in large part due to the war and the ongoing impact of Trump’s tariff policy.

Here are the report’s projected 2026 inflation rates for G7 countries:

U.S. 4.2% (up from 2.6% in 2025, according to its calculation)
U.K. 4% (up from 3.4%)
Germany 2.9% (up from 2.3%)
Canada 2.4% (up from 2.1%)
Italy 2.4% (up from 1.6%)
Japan 2.4% (the outlier, down from 3.2%)
France 1.8% (up from 0.9%)
If these projections are to be believed, some of the very staples Trump said were getting cheaper are getting more expensive.
Here’s why.
The OECD warns that inflation could spike as the Middle East conflict disrupts supply chains and the normal flow of trade. The longer it drags on, the worse things could get.

In particular, energy prices are an issue: Trump can no longer claim the cost of energy is down.


Marco Quiroz-Gutierrez (FORTUNE) notes that the Iran War is already impacting farmers:

With the planting season ending in six weeks, skyrocketing fertilizer prices are forcing farmers into an impossible choice: cut back and lose crop yield or stay the course and lose money.

A survey published Tuesday of 5,700 farmers conducted by the Farm Bureau shows that around 70% of farmers are unable to afford all the fertilizer they need, while nearly six in 10 said their finances have worsened due to the rising cost of both fertilizer and fuel. 
The new data comes as the Iran war has strangled the global supply chain as Iran exerts its control over the Strait of Hormuz, through which one-third of the global fertilizer shipments flowed before the war. While more than 20 commercial ships passed through the strait over the past several days—an improvement from earlier this month when Iran essentially shut down the strait—it’s unclear whether the flow of ships will improve as the war drags on well nearing its seventh week, despite a ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran signed last week, and a potential extension on the way.  
As a result, prices for the three major fertilizers farmers use (nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium), have all increased by double digits, according to Josh Linville, vice president of fertilizer at financial services firm StoneX Group

[. . .]

The clock is ticking. These farmers have only until the middle of May when planting season ends to decide whether they will scale back on their fertilizer use—which in the long run could lead to lower crop yields—or absorb the elevated costs and potentially lose money on their harvest. Otherwise, some farmers may even choose to sit out the season and potentially add debt through borrowing to make ends meet, Bryan Hansel, chief revenue officer at regenerative agriculture company Holganix, told Fortune.

“This is heart-wrenching for farmers to decide, do I lose money, or do I cut fertilizer, or, like, what do I do?” he said.

This is a serious issue.  As Ryan Mancini (THE HILL) reports:

A new survey revealed that a majority of U.S. farmworkers say they cannot afford fertilizer due to rising costs caused by the U.S.-Israeli conflict in Iran.

The survey released by the American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF) on Tuesday shows that 70 percent say fertilizer is too expensive and has left them unable to purchase the fertilizer they need. The AFBF also found that 94 percent of respondents say their financial situation has worsened or remained the same, compared to 6 percent who say their financial situations improved.

And, again as FORTUNE noted, the clock is ticking.  They've got weeks to make a decision.  Brandon Gomez (CNBC) points out, "When farmers cut fertilizer use or shift acreage, it raises the risk of lower crop yields and reduced overall production. With large portions of the South, Northeast and West unable to fully fertilize crops, the Farm Bureau suggests those risks are building."

The farmers suffer and the consumers will suffer.  Some of the suffering going on right now can be traced elsewhere, however.  Take tomatoes.  Greg Iacurci (CNBC) notes:

Prices for fresh tomatoes have soared in recent months, largely on the back of tariffs, higher energy costs triggered by the , and weather-related supply shocks, according to agricultural economists.

The average retail price of field-grown tomatoes jumped to about $2.26 per pound in March, the highest level in more than eight years, according to data tracked by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Consumers saw prices for fresh tomatoes spike about 15% in the month of March alone, following a 6% increase in February, according to the consumer price index, an inflation barometer.
The monthly inflation rate for tomatoes in March was the largest for any consumer good or service, outside of energy commodities like gasoline and fuel oil, which have risen sharply due to an oil supply shock tied to the ongoing conflict in the Middle East.

Overall, fresh tomato prices are up 23% over the past year, according to CPI data.

So it's not just Chump's war of choice destroying the economy and sending prices soaring, it's also his tariffs.   Greg Iacurci notes that "the US imports about 70% of its tomato supply — and Mexico accounts for about 90% of U.S. imports of fresh tomatoes" and that "the Trump administration levied tariffs of about 17% on fresh tomatoes from Mexico starting in July."  Ah, yes, the tariffs.  The tariffs that Chump swore would lower prices but instead caused prices to increase.  And increase some more.   Jeremy Phillips (24/7 WALL ST.) observes:

Overall grocery inflation slowed to 1.9% in March 2026, but this masks the real threat: tariffs and diesel prices are stacking to create an inflationary perfect storm on fresh produce—tomatoes spiked 22% due to a 17% tariff on Mexican imports while WTI crude jumped from $71 to $114 per barrel in five weeks, hitting perishable foods on the grocery store perimeter first as diesel tracks oil upward.

This emerging squeeze applies to any household buying fresh produce, dairy, and meat in 2026—particularly those without the income buffer to absorb price hikes on perimeter items—while the relief from egg and butter discounts masks deeper structural cost pressures that have not yet fully traveled through the supply chain.


Things are bad financially. Chump failed the American consumers in 2025 and it appears he's failing them in 2026.  Samuel O'Brient (BUSINESS INSIDER) notes that 

Anthony Scaramucci thinks economic pain isn't coming for the US. It's already here.
The former White House communications director added his voice to calls from prominent economists such as Mark Zandi, who have raised concerns about a recession recently, highlighting the fragile state of the economy and the impact of Donald Trump's policies.

"If you're asking me, 'Are we currently in a recession?' I believe, after 37 years on Wall Street, that we already are in one," he told Business Insider in an interview this week.

A number of people would agree with Scaramucci.  And don't believe Chump's lie that the IRS tax refund is going to save Americans.  Last night on THE 11TH HOUR WITH STEPHANIE RUHLE, Stephanie spoke with Brendan Greeley and Natasha Sarin about the reality of the tax returns. 







On MEIDASTOUCH NEWS, this morning, Ben notes the Iran War -- still ongoing, Donald's spin on Israel and Lebanon and much more.



Dan F. was alarmed when his daughter, a Marine aboard the USS Tripoli, a warship deployed to fight the Iran war, sent him a photo of a meal served on the ship. A lunch tray, two-thirds empty, carried one small scoop of shredded meat and a single folded tortilla.

A picture of a mid-April dinner on the USS Abraham Lincoln, shared by a service member with his family, was similarly unappetizing – a small handful of boiled carrots, a dry meat patty and a gray slab of processed meat.

Dan and other military family members worried that their loved ones deployed to the Middle East are going hungry are filling boxes with items they hope could help service members ride out prolonged deployments in the Middle East – homemade fudge, Jolly Ranchers, crossword puzzle books, playing cards, toothpaste, Girl Scout cookies and fresh socks. But mail delivery to military ZIP codes across the Middle East has been indefinitely suspended as of April, and packages in transit now hang in limbo.


Where's the money?  This is supposed to be budgeted in.  Did one of Chump's cronies get the supply contract?  Who's stealing from the US taxpayers and making money off short changing our service members?  There needs to be a Congressional investigation.  

There won't be right now because Congress -- both houses -- are controlled by idiots who believe that they serve Chump and not the American people.  This is why we have to turn out in the midterms and vote Democrat.  We need oversight of the government and we need accountability and we are not getting that from our Republican controlled Congress.


These are among the things hurting Chump in the polls.  There's also the war on immigrants, The Epstein Scandal, and other issues that allow Chump to now claim to have won in a landslide.  He didn't win the 2024 election in a landslide (he won by 1.5% of the popular vote).  Jermaine Hall (LEVEL) announces Chump's "landslide the world's most unpopular man:"

In America, there is constant polling to gauge the president's popularity. Recent results show Trump’s public standing sinking to some of the weakest levels of his presidency, with disapproval consistently outpacing approval by double‑digit margins. A YouGov/Economist survey reported a net approval of –23, with 58% disapproving of his performance and only 35% approving, marking a new low driven by erosion among his own 2024 voters. Meanwhile, The Economist’s tracking average places his approval at 37% and disapproval at 56%, reinforcing a sustained pattern of majority‑level unfavorability.

Results like those would send most presidents off to rethink and re-engage on policies.  Not Chump.  No a Chump's a chump for life.  The con artist thinks he can still pull a con over on the American people.  Jarrett Renshaw, Jacob Bogage and Steve Holland (REUTERS) report the 'big plan' Chump's devised, "U.S. President Donald Trump will look to brush off concerns about the economy and the sagging political prospects of his Republican Party during a campaign-style swing through the battleground states of Nevada and Arizona this week, as the war with Iran pushes gasoline prices higher."  That's a right, a nation already choking on Chump's lies are being fed more lies.  

Speaking of lies, remember when Chump claimed that the US was fine on weapons and had all they needed to fight Iran?  We noted that wasn't the case because it wasn't.  SEEKING ALPHA notes, "Senior Pentagon officials held talks with top executives of several companies, including General Motors (GM) and Ford (F), to discuss production of weapons and other military supplies, The Wall Street Journal reported. The officials also approached GE Aerospace (GE) and machinery maker Oshkosh (OSK), according to people familiar with the discussions."


Chump remains in trouble for posting an image of himself as Christ.  The blasphemous image followed days and days of Chump attacking Pope Leo.  Zoe Engels (MEDIAITE) reports that Chump got questioned about his attacks on the Pope yesterday:

 
Thursday afternoon, a reporter asked Trump about his motivations for “fighting” with the Pope and whether he’s worried it’s “upsetting” his “image” in an unfinished question quickly cut off by the president.

“No, no, I have to do what’s right,” he said. “The pope has to understand that, very simple. I have nothing against the pope. His brother is MAGA all the way. I like his brother, Louis [Prevost].

The reporter pressed again: “Why are you fighting with him?”

“I’m not fighting with him,” Trump claimed. “The pope made a statement. He says Iran can have a nuclear weapon. I say Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. If the pope looked at the 42,000 people that were killed over the last 2-3 months as a protester with no weapons, no nothing. I mean, you take a look at that. So, I can disagree with the pope. I have the right to disagree with the pope.”



It was this great sin of certainty that was on full display this week in Trump’s now-deleted Truth Social post in which he lambasted Pope Leo XIV, accusing the pontiff of being “weak” on crime and “terrible on foreign policy.” The president claimed the only reason Pope Leo was named head of the Catholic Church was because the church thought that would be the best way to deal with Trump, stating, “If I wasn’t in the White House, Leo wouldn’t be in the Vatican.” The rant was accompanied by an AI-generated image of Trump appearing as Jesus Christ, surrounded by an American flag, bald eagles, the Statue of Liberty, and figures resembling … Power Rangers? Facing fierce backlash, Trump has since claimed the image was not meant to depict him as Jesus but as a doctor in biblical robes because, in his words, “I do make people better. I make people a lot better.”
Trump’s rant was a reaction to Leo’s condemnation of his administration’s recent military misadventures, which have included a genocidal threat to wipe out Iran’s civilization. It’s not hard to imagine this catching Leo’s attention. Indeed, during his Palm Sunday homily the pope declared, “God does not listen” to the prayers of those who wage war. His homily was in reference to rhetoric from Trump and his Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, who have claimed the war in Iran has been carried out “under the protection of divine providence.” But as crazy as Trump’s Jesus-like grandeur may be, it was his administration’s reported behavior earlier this year that gives real pause for concern.
In January, Cardinal Christophe Pierre, then papal nuncio—the Vatican’s ambassador to the U.S.—was invited to the Pentagon for a meeting with Elbridge Colby, the U.S. undersecretary of war for policy. The invite was a response to the pope’s then-fresh comments lamenting the growing use of force to resolve diplomatic disputes. The meeting turned tense after Colby appealed to the papal nuncio to align the Vatican with Washington’s policies. When the cardinal declared that Pope Leo would continue to follow his own course guided by church values, a Pentagon official invoked the Avignon papacy of the fourteenth century, when the French king appointed his own “antipope” in reaction to Rome. The invocation was read as a clear threat: If Leo did not start toeing the Trump line, the president might be forced to appoint his own rival pope.
Like many threats from the Trump administration, one to appoint a pontiff was not well thought through. Like all holy leaders, popes strive to be living allegories of their faith. Many throughout history have fallen short, but one spiritual responsibility of the pope is to serve as a unifying spiritual figure for over 1.3 billion believers for the Catholic Church. What sets the pope apart from other Christian leaders is that Catholics believe in papal infallibility; that when he speaks ex cathedra on doctrines of faith and morals, his words are inspired directly by God (JD Vance, take notice).


For CNN, Aaron Blake does a lengthy analysis of the issues:

And despite Republicans like Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Vice President JD Vance arguing that the pope should stick to theology while politicians stick to politics, the Trump administration appears increasingly bent on casting the Iran conflict as a holy war blessed by God.

That makes for an awkward argument: While Pope Leo shouldn’t judge wars, Trump and Hegseth are allowed to judge God’s will.

Here’s a brief recap (with a tip of the cap to CNN’s Zachary B. Wolf, who has been documenting this for weeks):

  • Hegseth has said the military strikes are being “carried out under the protection of divine providence.”
  • He has quoted a Psalm which says, “Blessed be the Lord, my rock, who trains my hands for war and my fingers for battle.”
  • At a Christian service at the Pentagon recently, Hegseth cited imprecatory psalms — basically, prayers seeking God’s retribution against foes — which included asking for God to “break the teeth of the ungodly” and for God’s “overwhelming violence of action against those who deserve no mercy.”
  • At another service Wednesday, the Defense secretary recited a vengeful prayer he said was shared with him that appears to echo a notorious Samuel L. Jackson character’s monologue in “Pulp Fiction.”
  • He on Thursday suggestively cited a pair of rescue missions of American airmen as “miracles, you might say.”
  • Hegseth previously drew parallels between one of those rescues and Jesus’ resurrection.
  • Trump has punctuated his own remarks by saying, “glory be to GOD.”
  • And the president later wagered that God supports the war because “God wants to see people taken care of.”

The pope appears to have noticed this trend.

Mere minutes after Hegseth’s comments at the briefing Thursday morning, Pope Leo posted a pointed comment from a speech he had just delivered in Bamenda, Cameroon.

“Jesus told us blessed are the peacemakers,” the pope said. “But woe to those who manipulate religion and the very name of God for their own military, economic or political gain — dragging that which is sacred into darkness and filth.”


Turning to Chump's pal Jeffrey Epstein who died behind bars awaiting a trial on sex trafficking.  Daniel Hampton (RAW STORY) notes Chump mentioned his former friend yesterday, "President Donald Trump appeared to casually dismiss survivors of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell on Thursday during a brief gathering with reporters, referring to them as 'victims, or whatever.'  Trump took questions from reporters outside the White House when he was asked whether he believes there should be a public hearing for more Epstein survivors."  In a second piece, Daniel Hampton notes some of the reaction to Chump's comments:

"First, he's lying — no one refused to go under oath," wrote progressive political commentator Aaron Parnas on X. "The survivors said it's not their responsibility to testify in front of Congress when they've already spoken to the FBI. Second, 'victims or whatever' is one of the most derogatory things the President could say."

Political commentator Polly Sigh went further, pointing out that at least one of Epstein's survivors had accused Trump himself of rape.

"He's also lying about them refusing to go under oath," she wrote. "They spoke with the FBI — including the woman who accused Trump of raping her when she was a child."

MeidasTouch summed up the reaction bluntly: "Trump is now lying about the Epstein survivors, or as he calls them, 'the victims or whatever.'" 

One commenter drew a sharp contrast with Trump's recent self-portrayal. "He may have depicted himself as Jesus," wrote NHL analyst Mike Rifkin on X, "but he is the devil." He called Trump's dismissal a "disgusting thing to say."

Yesterday, CNN did a lengthy segment on Epstein.  They had a prosector and a profiler on to discuss Epstein and they also spoke with survivor Danielle Bensky. 




Any Donald Trump presidency inevitably evolves into a constellation of scandals, with him at the center of a scurrilous universe, as controversies orbit near him and then away, only to return again.

Trump can't stop that. So he tries to capitalize on it, using one scandal to distract from another. The Epstein files are a humiliating mess? Let's go to war with Iran! The war with Iran became a quagmire? Let's pick a fight with the pope!

We know it. We see it. But the way the Epstein files scandal – centered on millions of documents about Trump's former pal, the dead convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epsteincame back into our celestial view was astounding.Any Donald Trump presidency inevitably evolves into a constellation of scandals, with him at the center of a scurrilous universe, as controversies orbit near him and then away, only to return again.

Trump can't stop that. So he tries to capitalize on it, using one scandal to distract from another. The Epstein files are a humiliating mess? Let's go to war with Iran! The war with Iran became a quagmire? Let's pick a fight with the pope!

We know it. We see it. But the way the Epstein files scandal – centered on millions of documents about Trump's former pal, the dead convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epsteincame back into our celestial view was astounding.


And entering from the far, far right is crazy Alien Musk's even crazier father.  Steve Charnock (METRO) notes:


The always controversial figure of Errol Musk – father of Elon – has resurfaced with another eyebrow-raising take. This time the South African’s claiming that Jeffrey Epstein is still alive.

The 79-year-old made the comments during a primetime interview on Russian state television.
Asked, for some reason, about Epstein, Errol dismissed the official account of his death outright, leaning into long-running conspiracy theories about what exactly happened to the paedophile financier.

Convicted sex offender Epstein was found dead in his New York prison cell on August 10, 2019. He was, at the time, awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges in a case that drew global attention and endless – ongoing – scrutiny.




Turning to ICE, Minnesota continues to lead the way for the nation with how to respond to and handle ICE.  Dan Mangan (CNBC) reports:


An Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent has been charged with two counts of assault related to a road rage incident by state prosecutors in Minnesota, who have issued a nationwide warrant for his arrest.

The ICE agent, Gregory Donnell Morgan Jr., is accused of pointing his duty gun at the heads of two people in another car on Feb. 5 as he tried to pass them while illegally driving in his unmarked SUV on the shoulder of a highway in Minneapolis, prosecutors said Thursday at a press conference.
The incident came on the heels of the killings in January of two U.S. citizens, Renee Good and Alex Pretti, by federal agents in Minneapolis, amid the Trump administration's controversial Operation Metro Surge immigration enforcement actions in the Twin Cities.

Those killings remain under investigation by local prosecutors.

Morgan "is the first federal agent charged in connection with what happened here in Operation Metro Surge," Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty said in announcing the charges of second-degree assault against the agent.



State prosecutors allege that Morgan pulled up to a vehicle while driving an unmarked SUV and “pointed his duty weapon directly at both victims while continuing to drive illegally on the shoulder” of a highway on Feb. 4, prompting the driver to call 911.

[Hennepin County Attorney Mary] Moriarty said the Hennepin County Attorney's Office believes that "illegally driving on a shoulder, pulling up to a car and pointing a gun at the heads of two community members who are not doing anything at the time is well beyond the scope of [a federal agent's] authority."
She also accused Morgan of trying to evade traffic when the victim “briefly moved their vehicle into the shoulder to slow him down.” Morgan then allegedly pulled his vehicle adjacent to the victim's before opening the window and pointing his weapon at the driver and passenger.

Morgan allegedly told investigators that he and his partner were en route to the Whipple Federal Building following their shift and "admitted that he drew his firearm after the victim’s vehicle had already rejoined the normal flow of traffic, corroborating details from interviews with the victim” and video evidence from the scene, Moriarty said, slamming the behavior as "extremely dangerous."

“Driving while pointing a weapon out of your moving vehicle at the victims, who were in another moving vehicle, could have led to yet another disastrous incident in a community that has already suffered too many,” she declared.

In news out of Texas, ICE appears to have targeted a woman because she is an interpreter.  Brooke Migdon (PEOPLE) reports:


Meenu Batra, a longtime immigration court interpreter in South Texas, was detained by federal agents last month in what her legal team claims was a calculated action meant to intimidate her.
Batra, 53, has lived in Cameron County, Texas — the state’s southernmost county, along the U.S.-Mexico border — since 2002, and has worked as a court interpreter for more than 20 years. She is the state’s only licensed interpreter for Hindi, Punjabi, or Urdu, according to the Texas Observer, the first outlet to report on Batra’s detention.

Batra, who immigrated to the U.S. from India 35 years ago, had been planning to visit her adult children in Austin, Texas, after a work trip to Milwaukee in mid-March. But she never made it to either; at around 5 p.m. on March 17, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents detained her at a South Texas airport.
In a sworn statement, filed as part of a petition arguing her detention is unlawful, Batra said the people who arrested her did not have visible badges and were not wearing uniforms. One of the agents, she said, had asked her if she knew she was in the country illegally and that she had a deportation order, according to the Texas Observer. Batra told the agents that her work authorization was valid for another four years and that a New Jersey immigration judge had granted her temporary legal status years earlier.


Let's note this from Senator Patty Murray's office.

White House Budget Director Refuses to Tell Public About Iran War Costs: “We don’t have that figure right now.”

ICYMI: Senator Murray on President Trump’s FY27 Budget Request

***WATCH: Senator Murray’s full exchange with Russ Vought***

Washington, D.C. — Today—at a Senate Budget Committee hearing with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Russ Vought on President Trump’s fiscal year 2027 budget request—U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), a senior member and former chair of the Senate Budget Committee and Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, slammed Trump’s proposal to slash domestic investments to help pay for a defense spending increase of roughly half a trillion dollars. She pressed Director Vought on the astronomical request for war funding and on what President Trump’s war of choice in Iran has already cost American taxpayers.

In opening comments, Senator Murray said:

“A budget is really an expression of our morals and our values, and frankly, looking at Trump’s latest budget, I don’t see it as a very moral budget. We’re cutting tens of billions of dollars from housing, and health care, and education so we can spend half a trillion dollars more to fund Trump’s foreign wars.

“We should be sending more funding to our schools right here in America, not, in my opinion, buying more missiles that Trump could fire on schools in Iran. We should be building bridges here in America, not destroying them in Iran. And we should be bringing down energy costs, not blowing money on wars that send gas prices for our constituents through the roof.

“So, Director Vought, it will not shock you to hear that I believe that this budget is morally bankrupt. And also, by any objective measure, deeply irresponsible, because it will rob our families and burden our grandkids with mountains of new debt—and for what? For what? So Trump has more bombs he can threaten to ‘end civilizations’ with? 

“And also, this budget robs states like mine. It zeros out funding for Howard Hanson dam, once again shortchanges the Hanford cleanup. And now, just to be clear, I rejected those cuts in our last funding bills. I will do it again, as many times as it takes.

“But there is, in my opinion, only one place for this budget—and that is in the trash bin.”

[DEFENSE REQUEST]

Senator Murray called out the absurdity of Vought and Trump’s proposal to gut domestic investments to help pay for a half trillion dollar increase in war funding, and she pressed Vought on reporting that he privately opposed the increase and warned about its deficit impacts. Vought sidestepped the question, and despite his constant claims that he cares deeply about “fiscal responsibility,” Vought said he “fully support[s]” President Trump’s deficit-exploding budget request.

___________________________

MURRAY: But having said that, I do have some questions for you. You and President Trump are asking for $450 billion in new defense spending. To be clear, that is the largest increase since World War II—and that does not include money you reportedly still plan to request for the war in Iran. What is the total dollar amount requested for defense spending in FY27—including annual appropriations and reconciliation funds?

VOUGHT: $1.5 trillion, Senator, a combination between the appropriations and the mandatory. We are trying to increase the amount that you would fund through the appropriations, but we don’t want the full increase to have to be born in the appropriations process.

MURRAY: So $1.5 trillion.What is the total dollar amount requested for non-defense spending in FY27?

VOUGHT: $660 billion.

MURRAY: And what is the overall cut to non-defense programs you are proposing?

VOUGHT: 10 percent, $70 billion.

MURRAY: $70 billion—we look at that as about $81 billion, frankly. So let me just say this, Director Vought, you count yourself a spending hawk—and here you are, arguing for a gob smacking $1.5 trillion defense budget. I read that you disagreed with the president on his $1.5 trillion request—warning him that it would explode the deficit. Did you warn the president or administration officials that spending this much on defense would explode the deficit?

VOUGHT: Senator, I fully support this budget. We go through a long policy process. It’s needed for the Department of War. It’s one time, it’s made—it’s designed to have paradigm shifting investments, like I mentioned in my opening comments, to be able to fund now what this president is willing to do, multi-year agreements, and it’s necessary to keep us safe. I mean, I’ve never been more confident that an administration is doing whatever it can to be efficient at the Department of War, but there are bills that need to be paid with regard to drones and munitions and planes.

MURRAY: Well, you can do your political statement later. I will just say for the record that people at home need to understand this president is proposing that we cut over $73 billion in our domestic funding for things like education and health care, that are critical for our economy, for our families, for the future of our country, to help pay for a truly jaw-dropping half a trillion dollars in increase in defense spending. So I just think that we have to all recognize what is going on here and be smart about how we put together a budget as we go forward.

[IRAN WAR COSTS]

Pressed by Senator Murray, Director Vought again refused to provide any information—even a rough estimate—about how many taxpayer dollars have already been spent on President Trump’s reckless war in Iran.

___________________________

MURRAY: So let me just ask you, we’re here to talk about next year’s budget obviously, but as we talk about it, this administration is spending billions on the war in Iran as we speak. I heard Senator Merkley ask you a question. I just want to confirm this: you have no idea, none, much has been spent on the war so far?

VOUGHT: We don’t have that figure right now, I think in part, cause it’s fluctuating on a day in, day out basis, but it’s one of the reasons we want to—are studiously reviewing—

MURRAY: You can’t even give us a range?

VOUGHT: No, I’m not going to give you a range cause I don’t want to be inaccurate.

MURRAY: You’re just not going to tell us, because you don’t want us to know how much is being spent. We have a responsibility here, Senator Merkley mentioned that. We have to know how much is spent so we can put our budgets together, so we can make our annual appropriations. And I just find it outrageous that as director, you’re not willing to tell us what those costs are. It’s your job to know.

[BIPARTISAN APPROPRIATIONS PROCESS]

Director Vought also refused to disavow earlier comments he’s made calling for a less bipartisan appropriations process.

___________________________

MURRAY: Let me also ask you, you said that ‘the appropriations process has to be less bipartisan.’ Do you stand by that statement?

VOUGHT: Well, that was coming at a time during the rescissions process in which the use of a statutory process was derided by one side as a shot against the bipartisan appropriations process. And it’s not. You pass appropriations bills right now, and they have to get 60 votes to—you all are famously making that point to the country right now, but you also have a congressionally enacted statute that allows us to use rescissions with the majority vote.

MURRAY: Let me just tell you this. As a member of the Appropriations [Committee]—long standing—we work out very difficult differences between each other, and if we can’t trust at the end of the day that a deal is a deal, when we reach those bipartisan agreements, that is going to make it truly impossible for Congress to do its job. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

VOUGHT: Can I respond to that?

CHAIRMAN: Certainly. Chairman’s time, go ahead.

VOUGHT: We had a deal with regard to a bipartisanly negotiated DHS bill that would have funded DHS, and that was walked away from.

MURRAY: Let me make it very clear, I was at the table working on negotiating that. We worked really hard to come to an agreement. Obviously, we are not there yet. The Senate has now passed twice a bill to make progress on that, the House has not taken it up. I will take a backseat to no one on working hard to get the funding done that we need to get done. Thank you.

###


And lastly let's note this from THE BLACK COMMENTATOR:

The                       Black Commentator

             

 Issue                           #1083

             

             

 is                           now Online

              April 16, 2026
           

           
           

Read                         issue 1083

                       

Our email address                 is BlackCommentator@gmail.com

           

Our voicemail                 number is 856.823.1739




The following sites updated: