Wednesday, June 24, 2026

The Snapshot

Wednesday, June 24, 2026.  Chump lies desperately to avoid admitting he lost the war, the American people have had enough and the bulk of them say the Iran War was not worth it, they also look down on Chump as three new polls document, our courts can no longer take the Justice Dept at its word, Epstein remains an issue, Senate Democrats call out the Republican assault on reproductive rights, and much more. 


Ben notes on MEIDASTOUCH NEWS this morning Chump losing it early this morning on social media again.


Chump lost the war and is now trying to spin it -- and everything else -- into a win.


President Trump was eager on Tuesday morning to announce the latest concession that he says his negotiators extracted from Iran, writing on social media that the country had agreed to allow the “highest level Nuclear Inspections long into the future (Infinity!!!).”

But he omitted the fact that as a signatory to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, Iran is required to allow in international inspectors. And his statement came after the Iranians had insisted that there were no plans to allow inspectors into the three major nuclear sites the United States bombed a year ago — and where just about all the nation’s enriched uranium is stored.

The previous day, Vice President JD Vance, leaving the negotiating site at a Swiss resort, said Iran had agreed that if Iranian assets were unfrozen, the United States and Qatari officials would oversee the process and the money would be used to buy American farm products. The Iranians denied that, too, saying that the 14-point memorandum of understanding they had signed with the Americans did not require them to do so.

Negotiating with Iran has always been an extraordinary challenge. But until recently, one rule of diplomatic bargaining has usually held: “Nothing is agreed until everything is agreed.” That is how the United States and Iran traditionally have left themselves some trading space, and fine-tuned wording to satisfy the many critics at home who will have to be sold on any agreement. In 2015, when details of the inner-sanctum negotiations leaked, American officials complained bitterly, saying that the news reports were making it harder to get to a final deal.



As the war continues, the cost increases.  And Congressional Republicans appear to struggle with what they would be voting on.  Daniel Hampton (RAW STORY) explains

House Republican appropriators are publicly breaking with the Trump White House over what they call a "risky and uncoordinated" strategy to fund the U.S. military, warning that the administration is trying to push critical defense spending through a party-line reconciliation bill that may never reach the president's desk.
In an official addendum to the chamber's defense funding bill obtained by Politico, House appropriators warned that the White House is attempting to fund critical efforts, including weapons and military equipment, through the reconciliation process rather than using it to supplement regular government funding bills. The two vehicles operate on "entirely separate tracks, with different timelines, committees of jurisdiction, and approval processes," appropriators noted.
The rebuke singles out Trump's decision to split funding for the F-35 fighter jet, the most expensive weapons program in Pentagon history, between the annual government funding bill and the reconciliation package.
Analysts said last month the Pentagon's decision to split defense spending between the base budget and a reconciliation package has left members of Congress uncertain about what they're even voting to fund, with one expert calling the situation "symbolic of the disorder and chaos."


Alexander Bolton (THE HILL) notes Republicans in the Senate are not confused:

President Trump and Republican senators are headed for a collision Wednesday, when they will be meeting on Capitol Hill to discuss two major sources of strain: the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE America) Act and the Iran peace deal.

Republican senators are bracing themselves for an unpredictable, and potentially heated, discussion as tensions have been building with the president for weeks.
The meeting will give Trump’s critics within the GOP conference a chance to air their grievances like they did during an explosive meeting with acting Attorney General Todd Blanche last month.




The Iran War further destroyed the US economy.  And Americans have noticed.  Alicia Civita (LATIN TIMES) notes:

Most Americans disapprove of President Donald Trump's handling of the war with Iran, according to a new poll released by the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research, even as his overall job approval rating remains largely unchanged.

The survey comes at a pivotal moment in the conflict, as Trump has shifted from threatening military action against Tehran to suggesting that a new agreement with Iran has been reached. Despite that diplomatic opening, public opinion remains overwhelmingly negative regarding the administration's management of the war.
According to the poll, 65% of U.S. adults disapprove of Trump's handling of issues involving Iran, highlighting widespread skepticism about the conflict that began on Feb. 28. The findings underscore the political challenges facing the president as he attempts to reshape public perceptions of the war while simultaneously pursuing negotiations with Tehran.
[. . .]
Americans' views on Iran closely mirror their broader assessment of Trump's presidency. The AP-NORC survey found the president's overall approval rating stands at 37%, essentially unchanged from previous polling.



A new national poll shows President Donald Trump‘s approval rating at 30 percent, the lowest level recorded in the survey’s recent trend and a figure that, if reflected more broadly, would place him in territory historically associated with difficult midterm environments for incumbent presidents.
The June 16-20 American Research Group survey found that 66 percent of Americans disapprove of Trump’s job performance, while just 30 percent approve. The poll of 1,100 adults carries a theoretical margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
The findings come as economic pessimism deepens across the electorate and as both parties begin positioning themselves for the 2026 midterm elections, where voter perceptions of the economy are expected to play a central role.


 Jason Lange (REUTERS) notes a third poll -- still with bad news for Chump:

 Just one in four Americans believes President Donald Trump's war with Iran was worth its costs and a majority worry that a truce with Tehran is unlikely to last, a Reuters/Ipsos poll found.

The five-day poll, which closed on Monday, also showed the war weighing heavily on Trump's popularity, with his approval rating dropping to 34%, a return to the lowest level of the Republican's second term that was last touched in an April survey.
[. . .]
Only 24% of Americans think the war with Iran was worth the costs, the Reuters/Ipsos poll showed. Half of poll respondents said the conflict was not worth it and the rest were unsure.

Some 63% of Americans think it unlikely that the deal Trump signed will lead to lasting peace between the two countries. About half of Republicans and eight in 10 Democrats said the deal was unlikely to deliver peace. Just 18% of Americans — including 10% of Democrats and 34% of Republicans — see lasting peace as likely.



Americans see the damage Chump has done.  They know he lost the war, they know we suffer because of the war he started.  Heather Digby Parton (SALON) notes that Chump's looking for a win to distract from his failures with the Iran War: 


As the smoke from the agreement clears, a consensus has emerged — even among MAGA media, as Salon’s Sophia Tesfaye has explained — that the U.S. has suffered a profound defeat. This is largely because Trump had no strategy beyond assuming that bombing Iran and killing some members of the nation’s leadership would instantly lead to unconditional surrender and new leadership, which would then welcome Western businesses eager to build resorts on the Strait of Hormuz. For his part, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu apparently assumed that once Trump was committed to the war, he would not back off and would instead escalate as necessary to achieve the goal of regime change. Neither of them understood who and what they were dealing with, and the result is that the U.S. is weaker, Iran is stronger and Israel is even more isolated.
With peace talks having concluded in Switzerland, American delegation’s leader, Vice President JD Vance, proclaimed them a “successful foundation” for a comprehensive agreement. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced waivers so that Iran could immediately resume selling its oil. But will any of this really mean anything? Both the U.S. and Iran know that, at this point, neither country’s signature on a treaty is worth the paper it’s printed on. 
For his part, Trump has already declared victory. He is clearly eager to move on from what is undoubtedly the worst foreign policy failure of his presidency — and one of the worst in U.S. history. But since his psyche is so fragile, he will not be able to admit that to himself. Trump will need to bag himself a “win” as soon as possible to erase his defeat in the minds of the MAGA faithful — and to quiet the voices in his head screaming that he has screwed up once again. 
 
Senators are saying that they need to review and sign off on any 'deal' or 'treaty' or 'memo of understanding' or 'chain letter' that Chump signs with Iran.  Chump will probably attempt to blow them off.  But it's getting harder for him to get away with doing that.  For example, Kaia Hubbard (CBS NEWS) reports:

The Senate on Tuesday approved a House-passed resolution aimed at reining in President Trump on Iran, marking the first time such a measure has made it through both chambers and signifying a rare rebuke of the president's handling of the conflict.
In a 50 to 48 vote, four Republicans — Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Rand Paul of Kentucky — joined the bulk of Senate Democrats in support of the measure. One Democrat, Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, opposed. Two Republicans — Mitch McConnell and Dave McCormick — did not vote.
The resolution directs the president to "remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran," unless Congress declares war or authorizes the use of military force. But the measure is a concurrent resolution, which doesn't carry the force of law and doesn't require the president's signature, meaning it is largely symbolic.



Some Democratic senators, including Tim Kaine, have argued that passage of a war powers resolution is necessary, even after the US reached an agreement with Iran and amid ongoing negotiations with Tehran.
“I think it’s a good time to have the vote to say, ‘Hey, if we’re really in a period of maybe some stability here, let’s not just allow it to start up again without Congress being involved in that decision,” he told reporters last week.








America is not on board with the deranged and demented Donald Chump.  John Avlon (ROLLING STONE) observes:

As our 80-year-old Mad King goes on midnight social media revenge benders from the White House, attacking the pope after attacking Iran, enriching his family by billions and comparing himself to Jesus, some of his supporters are now panicking and asking, "Who could have seen this coming?" 
The answer, of course, is any sentient being not blinded by partisanship who lived through the first four years of Trump's presidency, which included more than 30,000 lies, a mismanaged pandemic that killed a million Americans, and culminated with his attempt to overturn an election on the back of a big lie that led to an attack on our Capitol.  
The dangers were so obvious that even the Founding Fathers could see them coming a quarter of a millennium ago. 
The U.S. Constitution was designed to protect the rights of the people against the rise of a would-be tyrant. The founders understood they were embarking on a rebellious project that had never succeeded before. As John Adams scowled, "There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide." Their aim was to build a structure that could withstand the forces that destroyed democracies in the past. 
That's why the founders explicitly warned about the dangers of a demagogue, the poison of hyperpartisanship, the corrosive effects of corruption and foreign influence, the politicization of religion, and the erosion of the separation of powers. 


Chump is a liar and he's turned the federal government into liars.  Homeland Security lied over and over about who they were taking in and why and they broke the law and lied about that.  The Justice Department is no longer believed in court.  Todd Blanche has said that the 'weaponization' slush fund is dead.  He's said that publicly and to Congress.  Yet because of the lies this administration has repeatedly told the courts, a judge is demanding that he provide a sworn statement, in writing, that the slush fund is dead and not coming back to life.  And he won't do it.  Because he's lying.  They're planning to bring back the 'weaponization' slush fund.  Todd Blanche is a liar.  And under Chump, he fits right in with the rest of the administration.  Leah Berenson (THE AMAZING TIMES) writes:

Federal judges don’t usually ask the government to prove itself. For most of American legal history, they didn’t need to. When a Department of Justice attorney stood before a court and made a statement, that statement carried a kind of institutional weight – the word of the United States government, delivered by lawyers who understood their ethical obligations ran to the court as much as to their client. That assumption held through administrations of both parties, through wars, political scandals, and constitutional crises. It has not held through this one.
Over the past eighteen months, something has shifted in federal courtrooms across the country. Judges in Virginia, Rhode Island, Minnesota, Florida, Manhattan, and Washington, D.C., have stopped treating the Justice Department’s representations as a reliable baseline. They are demanding paperwork. They are ordering preservation of internal communications. They are referring DOJ attorneys for disciplinary proceedings. Some are raising the possibility of contempt. The unwritten compact between the courts and the executive branch’s lawyers, that the government says what it means and means what it says, is under active pressure in ways that legal observers say have no recent precedent.
The most visible flashpoint right now involves a $1.776 billion fund, Trump legal documents, and a Virginia federal judge who is not satisfied with words.
U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema, sitting in the Eastern District of Virginia, extended her block on the Trump administration’s nearly $1.8 billion compensation fund in mid-June 2026, while simultaneously requesting that the Department of Justice submit a sworn declaration indicating it was not moving forward with the fund, signed by both the acting attorney general and the Treasury secretary.
The fund itself was controversial from the moment it was announced. The Justice Department set up the $1.776 billion fund, overseen by a five-member commission, to dole out payments to those who could show they were victims of “lawfare” and “weaponization,” terms Trump and his allies have used to describe investigations and criminal cases against them. The roughly 1,500 January 6 rioters Trump pardoned upon his return to the White House in 2025 are among those most likely to profit from the fund, which Trump’s DOJ established as part of a settlement stemming from the president’s $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS over the leak of his tax returns.
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche had told Congress that the fund was not moving ahead, but Judge Brinkema said the Justice Department would have a week to confirm that assertion with a sworn statement if it wanted to halt her injunction. The judge’s reasoning was straightforward. Brinkema expressed concern over Trump’s own public comments and Blanche’s refusal to commit to rescinding the fund in writing, noting that the president’s statements “carry a lot of weight” and represent “a pretty good indicator that there will be some incentive or motive to make it happen.”
Blanche had already refused to make that commitment in writing when asked to do so by Democratic lawmakers, and Trump repeatedly expressed his support for the concept of the fund, prompting questions about whether the administration was actually abandoning it.

We need to all grasp this.  The Justice Dept cannot be trusted.  The courts can't trust it.  They have lied non-stop over and over to the courts -- and to the grand juries -- and this has happened with no remorse on the part of the president of the United States.  Chump is not fit to be president.  

And it is a mark of shame that our own federal government cannot be trusted by the courts at present.  They have lied repeatedly.  It is outrageous.  




Twenty-three state attorneys general filed a scathing brief Monday calling Trump's settled IRS lawsuit a "collusive sham" that fraudulently used the courts to funnel taxpayer money to the president's allies and immunize the Trump family from federal investigations.
The brief, filed in the Southern District of Florida and led by California Attorney General Rob Bonta, urges the court to reopen the case and grant "all necessary and appropriate relief" to "rectify the fraud perpetrated upon the Court and deter future misconduct by those who have sworn to faithfully uphold and support the rule of law."
The attorneys general argued that Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, Trump's own former personal lawyer, rushed the settlement through two days before the parties were due to answer a judge's questions about whether the lawsuit was even a legitimate dispute. Rather than respond, they say, Blanche executed agreements creating a $1.776 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund" and a sweeping immunity addendum that bars the government from ever investigating the Trumps' tax returns, then kept both documents off the court docket until after the case was closed.
"Put simply, the parties’ conduct has revealed that the litigation was nothing more than a corrupt effort to 'defile the court itself' through a collusive sham lawsuit," the brief stated.



The US Justice Department made an illegal deal with President Donald Trump to immunize him, his family and his businesses from audits or other federal probes related to past filings, a group of tax experts and former Internal Revenue Service officials told a judge.
The settlement, part of a broader agreement to resolve Trump’s controversial $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS over a leak of his private data, violates a clause in the Constitution barring presidents from receiving any non-salary compensation, the group said in a filing Monday in federal court in Miami.
“The termination of tax audits alone could save his businesses $100 million or more,” according to the group, which includes former IRS Commissioner John Koskinen and former Assistant Attorney General for the Tax Division Kathryn Keneally. “This appears to be a special deal just for President Trump, as DOJ is continuing to defend other cases involving similar leaks of taxpayer information.”
US District Judge Kathleen Williams, who had earlier closed the case after it settled, is considering reopening it to investigate whether the president and the Justice Department defrauded the court by filing a “collusive” lawsuit. It’s the latest fallout from the Justice Department’s controversial settlement with Trump, the first president to sue his own government.



Let's turn to news of the late Jeffrey Epstein -- pedophile and friend of Donald Chump for many decades.



The top news story every day should be that JD “Vladimir Futon” Vance led a secret staff meeting in the SITUATION ROOM nearly a year ago to discuss how to better cover up the Epstein Files to protect Trump, rather than seeking justice for any of the victims and survivors. Aside from the egregious misuse of the Situation Room, we know the entire administration is involved.
Of course, that’s kind of tough with so much of the media under Trump’s sway while he continues to bully anyone who dares to tell the truth about him or ask any questions that might force him to think about things he doesn’t want to think about.
We now know that FBI was told that Trump Tower was a “hunting ground” for “recruiters” to find young women for him to have sex with. And thanks to yet more bombshell reporting, we’ve also learned that at least three million more pages of Epstein documents are still being held back by acting AG Todd “Trumpsimp” Blanche, who seems super excited to be the first to go to prison for Trump.
Blanche will once again face questioning by the Senate, and I was fortunate to grab a moment with my Senator, Ron Wyden (D-OR), on Friday after a press conference centered around Juneteenth and Pride.
“Sen. Chutzpah” is the ranking Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee and also sits on the Senate Intelligence Committee, among his many other responsibilities. He promised me last year that he’d never give up on Epstein, and he continues to deliver on that promise, as evidenced by his most recent questioning of Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. He also ripped Bessent over the latest Trump grift that was created to enrich his two older adult sons.
As Wyden and I walked out of the press conference, I quietly asked him about the Situation Room meeting. “Wasn’t that something?” he replied.
“So, what people want to see is accountability,” I said. “Do we have to wait until Democrats get the majority back before that happens?”
“Nope!” Sen. Chutzpah immediately responded. He then told me that more hearings were coming, and specifically mentioned Blanche.

In other Epstein news, Robert Davis (RAW STORY) notes:

A legal expert claimed to have uncovered a "clear admission" by President Donald Trump's Department of Justice that it broke the rules to help convicted sex criminal Ghislaine Maxwell get into a minimum security prison.
Liz Oyer, a former Obama administration pardon attorney, argued in a new Substack essay that Trump's DOJ deliberately changed long-standing Bureau of Prisons policies on inmate classifications, thereby allowing Maxwell to communicate directly with the Attorney General's office. She described the change as "highly sus," given how closely Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and Maxwell seemed to work together to facilitate the transfer.
"In doing my research for this post, I came across what sure looks like a clear admission that rules were broken," Oyer wrote, adding that the Change Notice associated with the new Bureau of Prisons policy was "pretty incredible" to read.
"It empowers the Attorney General 'to designate or redesignate the place of a prisoner’s imprisonment' at his discretion. In other words, the AG can simply direct BOP staff to place a specific prisoner in a specific facility—without regard for any of the established rules," Oyer surmised. "That means that Blanche now has the authority to send Maxwell to any prison in the country (if this holds up against legal challenges). He could potentially even transfer her to home confinement or a halfway house in the community."



The horrors that took place on Epstein Island are a matter of record, but this year, we’ve learned so much more about Epstein’s other covert trafficking property where men, women, and children were abused and at least two foreign women went missing.
New Mexico’s Zorro Ranch is home to many secrets, but despite Tr*mp’s best efforts at allegedly derailing the investigation into the property, the New Mexico DOJ is going all the way in.
Last week, members of the legislative subcommittee to probe into Zorro Ranch sent a number of subpoenas to high-level banks, warning that even the richest and most powerful Epstein clients and associates will be called to task as the investigation continues.
The property known as “Playboy Ranch” saw victims pass through for over 20 years with no one the wiser, thanks to the ranch’s remote location near the state border. When an initial investigation into the 8,000 acre territory was shelved in 2019 after New York prosecutors took the case over from New Mexico state investigators, the site laid fallow for years… until this February, when New Mexico House of Representatives formed the New Mexico House Truth Commission, a bipartisan subcommittee determined to seek answers around Epstein’s crimes specifically at Zorro Ranch.
Epstein associates Ghislaine Maxwell and Lesley Groff have remained tight-lipped about what went down at Playboy Ranch, but the New Mexico DOJ is taking a different route with these subpoenas: they’re following the money.
Not only are JP Morgan and Deutsche Bank getting subpoenaed: investigators are also calling on Google, Peter Thiel’s PayPal, travel booking site Expedia, and phone companies AT&T and Verizon to lock down any records having to do with Epstein’s New Mexico property.
In light of the continuing cover-up concerning Epstein’s personal relationship to Tr*mp, investigators are making a smart move. Individuals might be able to be persuaded—or threatened—into walking back testimony (*cough* Howard Lutnick) but bank statements don’t lie.


Let's wind down with this from Senator Patty Murray's office:

***WATCH: Video of full forum***

***WATCH and READ: Senator Murray’s opening remarks***

Washington, D.C. — Today — ahead of the four-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s disastrous decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization overturning the constitutional right to abortion—U.S. Senators Patty Murray (D-WA), a senior member and former chair of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP), Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Tina Smith (D-MN), and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) hosted a spotlight forum titled Post Dobbs Chaos: Republicans’ War on Reproductive Health Care. At the forum, Senate Democrats heard from panelists who have suffered the consequences of the Dobbs decision and subsequent Republican abortion bans firsthand. They discussed how the Trump administration and Republicans are sowing chaos for women and health care providers across the country through ongoing attacks on reproductive rights and women’s health care, alongside escalating efforts to enact a nationwide abortion ban.

“The Dobbs decision was just the beginning of Republicans’ war on women’s reproductive rights—their goal has always been a national abortion ban. Republicans are hoping we don’t notice, but from trying to get mifepristone classified as a water contaminant to defunding Planned Parenthood, we can see clear as day that Republicans are working to enact a national abortion ban,” said Senator Murray. “Republicans have already caused enormous damage, shuttering women’s health clinics across the country, forcing women to carry dangerous pregnancies to term, and decimating access to maternal health care. But Democrats will continue to push for legislation to protect women and health care providers. That’s why we are uplifting the stories of women across the country who have suffered from Republicans’ abortion bans and the providers who are trying their best to care for them. We will keep fighting to restore the right to abortion for every woman in all 50 states.”

The senators’ spotlight forum comes after more than a year of Republican trifecta control of government, during which the Trump administration and Republicans in Congress have repeatedly attacked the reproductive health care American women depend on, creating widespread disruption and turmoil for patients and providers alike. Last year, Republicans in Congress pushed through their Big Ugly Bill that defunded Planned Parenthood and is kicking millions of Americans off Medicaid. Last year, the Trump administration withheld millions in Title X funding, putting more than 840,000 people at risk of losing access to family planning and preventive health care. This year, the administration further destabilized the Title X program by delaying the standard application process for new grants.

Throughout 2025 and into 2026, Republicans intensified their campaign to eliminate access to mifepristone—an FDA-approved abortion medication—through sham hearings, politically motivated reviews, conspiracy theories, attempts to weaponize environmental laws, and by continued efforts to secure abortion restrictions through the courts. More recently, the Trump Department of Justice announced, and later walked back, a $1.7 billion slush fund that could compensate anti-abortion extremists convicted of assaulting abortion clinic staff and violating the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act—notably, despite widespread bipartisan condemnation, Trump refuses to rule out establishment of the fund. At the same time, the Trump administration has abandoned enforcement of the FACE Act, further emboldening those who threaten patients, providers, and access to reproductive health care.

“At my 20-week scan, I received the devastating news of my life, our daughter had anencephaly. Her brain and skull would never fully develop. Nothing could save her. She was 100% incompatible with life. She was going to die. The only question was, when, and whether she would die inside my body, before I knew it, putting my own life at risk. I thought for sure that I would be granted an ‘exception.’ I thought my doctors could show Halo and I compassion. I was wrong. When I asked what my options were, I was told I didn’t have any. Because Texas has an abortion ban. The one person I trusted with my life, my doctor, my healthcare provider, had her hands tied by the State. Helping me could have sent her to jail. … I had no rights to my own body. I was a vessel for the state,” Samantha Casiano, former plaintiff, Zurawski v. State of Texas, said during her testimony. “My daughter, Halo, lived a few agonizing hours before she passed away. While she was still here, her eyes started to bleed. She was like a fish pulled from water gasping for air. She changed colors in front of us, pink, red, blue, purple, until she was gone. That trauma is permanently imprinted in my memory. Because under Texas’s cruel abortion ban, I was forced to give birth to a baby every doctor knew would not survive, and then walk out of that hospital as if nothing happened, like she was never here. It was like sending my child into a war we all knew she would lose. It was cruel. It was inhumane. … Many women do not know this is happening to them until it happens. Right now, as we sit here there is a woman out there reliving my nightmare. I want her to know she is not alone. I see you. I hear you. I stand with you. … I will give my last breath as Halo did to make sure that happens.”

“We found out our baby had a lethal genetic anomaly affecting bone development. Soon my baby’s bones would begin to break in utero at my slightest movement — like bending down to pick up my three-year-old son. At birth, their rib cage would be too small to support lung function. We were told our baby would suffocate at their first breath without immediate extreme medical intervention. This diagnosis came 25 days after Texas’s extreme heartbeat bill, SB8, went into effect. … At the end of the appointment, I was handed a printout of my own medical records with the advice to seek a second opinion — outside of Texas,” Kaitlyn Kash, former plaintiff, Zurawski v. State of Texas, said during her testimony. “A few months later I was pregnant again, but my third and fourth pregnancies ended in miscarriage. I needed medication — the same medication used in medical abortions — to help my body pass the fetal tissue and prevent infection that could jeopardize my future fertility. Because of the fear and confusion surrounding these laws, my prescription was challenged. I was treated like an addict looking for drugs instead of a mother losing her child — navigating a broken, frightened healthcare system while actively bleeding, while grieving, until I was finally able to obtain it through an online pharmacy. My husband and I then chose IVF. Eleven months later, we finally welcomed our second child — the result of my fourth pregnancy in less than two years. As I lay there holding my baby on my chest, I thought — we made it. That feeling was short-lived. My placenta wasn’t delivering. I needed a D&C — a procedure used to clear tissue from the uterus, and yes, also used in abortions. My doctor said it needed to happen quickly. … Fifty minutes after my daughter’s birth, I started violently throwing up and shaking. … I lost consciousness. When I woke up, I was told I had lost half my blood volume. I was told I was ‘lucky’ I still had my uterus. … I wish I could tell you I have bad luck. I would love for my story to be a lightning strike. But it’s not. Every part of what happened to me happens to families across this country every single day. … You do not get to know the healthcare you need until you need it. You can be against abortion for yourself. You can never choose it. But you cannot restrict access to a category of medical care without consequences that reach every pregnant person in this country. Every woman you have ever loved — your daughters, your sisters, your nieces, your granddaughters. These bans force unimaginable pain and push hundreds of thousands of women into impossible situations they never saw coming. Trust me. I never imagined it either.”

“Four years after Dobbs, we are still dealing with a massive public health crisis. People still need abortions. They are still getting abortions. The difference is that they now have to travel farther, wait longer, spend more money, and overcome more obstacles to obtain the same healthcare. Those costs do not disappear. They are absorbed by patients, families, providers, and abortion funds,” Megan Jeyifo, Executive Director, Chicago Abortion Fund, said during her testimony. “The total spent on abortion funding has tripled since Dobbs, from just over $16 million to more than $48 million. Every day, we hear from people trying to make thoughtful decisions about whether to start or grow their families while navigating rising costs, unstable housing, inadequate childcare, and shrinking social safety nets. Federal and state policy decisions shape those realities. For many of the people we serve, the decision to have an abortion is inseparable from the economic conditions in which they are raising children and planning their futures. … Many of the women who built this movement have told me they never imagined their children and grandchildren would come of age with fewer abortion rights than the ones they themselves fought to secure. Four years into a new post-Roe era, I cannot pretend things are not sometimes very dark. When we spent a weekend just last month wondering whether access to medication abortion through telehealth and the mail might be dramatically curtailed for millions of people across the country, that was hard. And we know that fight—and others like it—are still coming.”

“Maine is one of the most rural states in the nation, with 40% of its population living in rural communities where access to healthcare can be difficult and, in some cases, out of reach. Indeed, in many of Maine’s rural communities, access to reproductive healthcare has effectively disappeared. A severe shortage of family planning and reproductive health providers, combined with the closure of hospital labor and delivery units across the state, has left many patients with few or no local options for care. As OB/GYN providers have left these regions, existing gaps in care have only deepened in my state,” said Evelyn Kieltyka, Senior Vice President of Program Services, Maine Family Planning. “Maine Family Planning tried to meet the state’s health care crisis head-on by expanding into primary care and offering wellness and preventive services, treatment for acute and chronic conditions, and geriatric care. However, because our primary care model was designed to serve Medicaid patients, we were forced to discontinue these services after we lost Medicaid funding. … Maine is facing a significant shortage of labor and delivery services. Since 2015, 12 rural hospitals have closed their labor and delivery units, and another closure is under consideration this year. To help address this gap, MFP was exploring collaborations with the remaining birthing centers to provide prenatal and postpartum care. These partnerships could have saved patients hundreds of miles of travel, as well as lost wages and childcare expenses. However, without Medicaid funding, MFP cannot consider this type of expansion. … MFP is sending a clear message to the current administration: We refuse to compromise the services and care we offer to our patients. Our clinics offer life-changing care, life-saving care, and we’re not giving up. Congress has the power to restore Medicaid funding to family planning providers who also offer abortion care. I ask that you do everything in your power to do so. The health and well-being of Mainers and their families, as well as that of patients across the country, depends on it.”

“Across the country, around 550 Planned Parenthood health centers provide birth control, cancer screenings, wellness exams, STI testing and treatment, and abortion, where legal. Planned Parenthood health centers see everyone — no matter who you are, where you live, or what problems you’re facing. In many communities, they’re the only providers of reproductive health care. … This week marks four years since the Dobbs decision. It also marks nearly one year since President Trump and Republicans in Congress ‘defunded’ Planned Parenthood by aiming to block most Medicaid patients from using their insurance at Planned Parenthood health centers. These things didn’t happen by accident. They are part of the anti-abortion movement’s coordinated, decades-long plan to make it harder for everyone, everywhere to get an abortion. And the consequences have been devastating,” said Alexis McGill Johnson, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Federation of America. “Last November, visits for birth control pills were down by 20 percent compared to the same period the previous year. STI testing declined by 11 percent. And in December, breast exam visits declined by 25 percent. That means cancers undetected and STIs untreated. Patients unable to plan for their families and their futures. This crisis is on top of the crisis caused by the Dobbs decision. 20 states now ban abortion. And bans do not stop abortion — they add burdens to those seeking them and those providing them. These cowards are continuing to push their agenda regardless of the human cost. … Planned Parenthood organizations are staying vigilant against this threat — along with threats to mifepristone, Title X, and more.”

“Today is a grim anniversary for America, marking four years since Trump’s MAGA Supreme Court stole women’s rights to control their own bodies,” said Leader Schumer. “Dobbs will go down as one of the worst, most devastating decisions in American history—but for Republicans, it was just the start of their all-out assault on reproductive freedom. Women seeking basic health care are being treated as criminals, doctors are being threatened with jail time for providing it, and families are being destroyed by Republicans who don’t trust women to make the decisions that are right for them and their families. This isn’t care; it’s control. Not protection, but punishment. Republicans created this health care crisis, and they made it worse a year ago when they passed their ‘Big, Ugly Bill’ and enacted the largest health care cuts in history. Democrats are fighting back to restore and protect abortion rights nationwide.”

“It’s been four years since women lost their constitutionally protected right to abortion. Since then, Americans and their doctors have been forced to navigate a patchwork of bans and restrictions on abortion that have resulted in women bleeding out in parking lots, travelling across state lines for care, or being forced to wait weeks to terminate unviable pregnancies,” said Senator Baldwin. “27 million women still live in states under abortion bans and I remain committed to telling their stories until we can restore the rights and freedoms every American deserves to make their own decisions about their own body.”

“Republicans’ long crusade against women’s reproductive freedoms has created national chaos that is a mortal threat to women’s health. I’m grateful to the panelists today who are helping shine a light on the stories of women across this country who continue to be denied lifesaving medical care and basic human rights,” said Senator Smith. “The four-year anniversary of the Dobbs decision is a moment for us to recommit to the fight, and especially to the effort to ensure mifepristone remains accessible and available no matter where you live. I will not stop organizing and fighting until women’s freedoms can be exercised equally in all parts of this country.”

“Four years ago, the Supreme Court stripped Americans of the freedom to make their own reproductive healthcare decisions—putting that power in the hands of politicians. The Trump Administration and Republicans across the country are leading a campaign of assault against women’s healthcare, restricting access to critical, often life-saving care. We need action now—I remain committed to never stop fighting for reproductive justice, abortion access, and the simple, foundational right to choose your own healthcare,” said Senator Blumenthal.

“Four years after Dobbs, women are worse off. They are traveling farther, paying more, and facing greater barriers to care. Since Idaho imposed a restrictive abortion ban, more than one-third of the state’s OB-GYNs have left – and women are forced to seek care elsewhere. This strains care in states like Washington that have continued to protect abortion rights. I will continue fighting to restore abortion protections for patients and doctors nationwide,” said Senator Cantwell.

“We must keep working to pass legislation to protect women and their families in the aftermath of Roe v. Wade,” said Senator Cortez Masto. “That’s why I’ve introduced legislation with Senator Murray and others to protect women who cross state lines to get abortions, as well as the providers who care for them. I’m fighting to ensure Nevada and other pro-choice states can continue taking care of women and families who need help.”

“When Trump’s hand-picked Justices on the Supreme Court threw out our constitutional right to choose, they did more than ban abortion—they put women in danger,” said Senator Duckworth. “They crushed the dreams of hopeful parents—including our nation’s servicemembers and Veterans—who live in abortion-ban states and rely on IVF to build their families. They increased the maternal mortality rate because doctors are afraid to provide lifesaving care to pregnant women who are bleeding out or suffering deadly infections. There is simply nothing ‘pro-life’ about Trump ending Roe v. Wade. Nothing.”

“Four years ago, the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority abandoned the long-standing constitutional protections recognized in Roe v. Wade, dragging women’s rights half a century backward. The Trump Administration and Republicans in Congress and states across the country have used this as a mandate to attack reproductive freedoms at every level,” said Senator Durbin. “But the fight is far from over, and I will continue to push back against these harmful restrictions on women’s health care and autonomy.”

“Four years after the Supreme Court’s disastrous Dobbs decision, women across our country continue to suffer devastating consequences. From restricting lifesaving emergency care to forcing patients to travel across state lines for essential services, Republicans’ war on women and our bodily autonomy doesn’t just undermine the fundamental right to healthcare—it endangers millions of lives,” said Senator Hirono. “As the Trump regime continues to attack our basic rights and freedoms, I will do everything in my power to restore and expand access to abortion and family planning services nationwide, and fiercely protect healthcare providers and the patients they serve.”

“By stripping women of our hard-earned reproductive freedoms and jeopardizing access to life-saving health care, the Supreme Court’s outrageous Dobbs decision set back decades of hard-fought progress,” said Senator Shaheen. “Four years later, our fundamental rights are still under attack. The testimonies we heard at the forum are powerful reminders of what we’ve lost since the Dobbs decision and what continues to be at stake in the fight to restore access to the full range of reproductive health care.”

Senator Murray is a longtime leader in the fight to protect and expand access to reproductive health care and abortion rights, and she has led Congressional efforts to fight back after the Supreme Court’s disastrous decision overturning Roe v. Wade. Murray has introduced more than a dozen pieces of legislation to protect reproductive rights from further attacks, protect providers, and help ensure women get the care they need; Murray has led efforts to push for passage of these bills on the Senate floor multiple times over the last four years.

###




The following sites plus Stan's "THE LONG KISS GOODNIGHT," Ruth's "Chump has no sense of style" and Mike's "Chump fades Miss Sassy irritates" --  updated: