Thursday, July 11, 2013

Can someone drive NPR's Carrie Johnson to the free clinic?

Carrie Johnson fawns on public radio today.  The 'journalist' appears to believe she was interviewing Channing Tatum, why else for the nonsense questions?  I know Channing, he's a nice guy and a great actor.  But Johnson was supposedly doing an audio report for Morning Edition on a judge.  We didn't need her character profile and she may want to call the idiot judge "master" (and she does call him that) but the rest of us are shaking our heads and asking what the hell has happened to NPR and why does it never fail to disappoint?


Her awful interview is with weirdo Judge Royce Lamberth.

Lamberth is all that is wrong with this country and the government.

But don't expect Carrie to go there or to even ask one damn question.  Instead it's all fluff and it's so damn embarrassing.  She really has traded journalism for whoring, hasn't she?

Proving what a cheap whore she is, she has to try to trash Bill Clinton.


Carrie Whore:  And in 2000, he ruled that President Clinton himself violated the Privacy Act by releasing personal letters to allegedly undermine the credibility of Kathleen Willey, who accused the then-president of making unwanted sexual advances.

Is that pertinent?

I don't see how.  But if it is pertinent, so is this:
The appellate panel sharply criticized a lower court judge who asserted in a March 29 ruling that the president committed ''a criminal violation of the Privacy Act'' in releasing personal letters sent to him by Kathleen Willey, a former White House volunteer. 
[. . .] 
Today, the appellate judges -- Harry T. Edwards, Douglas H. Ginsburg and David S. Tatel -- said Judge Lamberth's ''sweeping pronouncements'' about supposed criminal activity were inappropriate and ''entirely superfluous.''


That is from David Stout's New York Times report from May 27, 2000.

I'm sorry, Carrie Johnson, I'm just not in the mood for your ____ whoring.  You never should have cited that nonsense to begin with but having done so in the midst of a 'retrospective' on the judge's career, having cited that ruling it was incumbent upon you to cite that the ruling was criticized by a higher court.

Didn't do that, did you?

What a trashy whore you are.  You're embarrassing even yourself, Carrie Johnson.  


When people say that NPR is 'liberal,' I always remember that NPR launched one attack after another on Bill Clinton when he was president and that, in the time since, it's always been trying to smear with some alleged sex scandal. 

If there was a reason to bring that up, it was due to the Privacy Act and how the idiot judge Lamberth doesn't give a damn about privacy or about honesty.

Remember James Rosen?  The Fox News reporter who was in the news in May?  He was spied on by the government.  And one of the accusations/claims was that Rosen was lying about only having learned of it.  We were told that Fox News was informed.  No, they weren't.  That was found out only after days of the White House LYING.  Fox News was never informed, Rosen was never informed.


The spying took place and the order was sealed for over two years.  And who was responsible for that?   Why Dumb Ass Judge Lamberth. 

If that's news to you, refer to Ryan Lizza's report for The New Yorker.

Here's Carrie Whore, "And he recently upset the media by approving a search warrant for the email and phone records of a Fox News reporter in a leak case."  No, the piece of crap upset the media because secret searches aren't supposed to take place and shouldn't be buried for two years. 

In fact, she's not just a whore, she's a dumb whore.

 Carrie Johnson:  Lamberth's infuriated both Republican and Democratic administrations.  He threw the Obama White House into uproar almost three years ago when he blocked it's move to expand stem-cell research.  And he recently upset the media by approving a search warrant for the email and phone records of a Fox News reporter in a leak case.  The judge who wears cowboy boots to stuffy legal events really doesn't have a problem with that.  In fact, earlier in your career people called you . . .

I'm sorry, she said he infuriated both Republican and Democratic administration and then, to back up her point, she cited a ruling that may have bothered Barack's White House and then she cited the media?  How stupid is she?

Pretty damn stupid.

He should never have been allowed to make the claims he did without being challenged.  He got an entire segment and he got praised for a Native American case -- despite the fact that the xenophobe repeatedly refers to them as "Indians" -- which I guess we should be grateful for -- after all, he might have been even more offensive and called them 'injuns.'


Judge Dumb Ass:  What I found that bothered me was the notion that the court was a rubber stamp because we were approving so much.  We're approving it because it should be approved because it's valid, what the government is doing here is what the government is the kinds of things we should be doing. [. . .]  And in the days following 9-11, I went to some of the most blood curdling meetings and briefings in my lifetime to hear some of the things that we were being told  might be the next follow up.  

Really?

Maybe that's why you don't put scared old men in charge of making decisions.  We suffered as a country because that idiot approved every damn thing and because he lied and because he's a nut job.  Not a maverick, a nut job.  There have been few judges (he's a Reagan appointee) in the last 20 years who have such a long record of their decisions being rebuked by higher courts.

He's retiring?  The headline there is, "Good News For America, Whack Job To Leave The Bench."




The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.






iraq iraq iraq iraq iraq iraq
Posted by at