Saturday, September 08, 2007

Ruth's Report

Ruth: As Congress prepares to betray the people who put them in office, it is worth noting that they only are able to do that because they are so far removed from the people. The Democrats appear to think there is so much fear and anger over Ralph Nader's presidential run in 2000 that the Democratic Party will go along with anything. It is, of course, a misreading in the same way that blaming the 2000 election on Mr. Nader is a misreading.

The constant whine that a Democrat lost because a third party candidate ran is a cry that resonates less and less although a number of childish commentators still attempt to push that lie. It honestly reminds me of a child who comes in second in a race throwing a fit and insisting she or he would have won if that other child had not been in the race.

The longer they go to the well on that, the more obvious it becomes. The other big fear they run on is the Bully Boy who, if the Constitution is followed, leaves office in January of 2009. Which leaves one to wonder exactly what they plan to run on after the immediate future?

Having repeatedly spent 2007 and their majorities in both houses of Congress to betray voters on the issue that swept them into office, Iraq, it will be very interesting to watch them yet again trot out the "trust us" pledges. I also find it interesting how little reporters seem to know.

Democrats in Congress who want to force a withdrawal of most combat troops don't have the votes. To pass a law mandating a withdrawal by a certain date, they'd need more Republican support, and most Republicans reject the idea.

Nancy A. Youssef and Renee Renee Schoof's "Despite Iraq reports, troops' future is set" (McClatchy Newspapers) wrote the above indicating that they never paid attention in high school civics class or they rushed through the writing of their piece. The Democrats do have the votes. They do not have the votes to override a presidential veto. But Congress has the powers to end the illegal war. One way was explained by former U.S. Senator Mike Gravel who is currently running for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination. Speaking with Diane Rehm on the August 8, 2007 broadcast of NPR's The Diane Rehm Show, Senator Gravel explained how you end the illegal war:


Real simple. You see, they do a cloture vote. Oh one cloture vote, two, can't do it. Stop. Or an override veto. Can't do it? Stop. That's ridiculous. The rules permit to have a vote on cloture every single day, seven days a week, and all the way through this August recess which they're all taking -- and then when the bill comes back vetoed they can repeat it every single day and, I promise you, Diane, that in twenty, forty days we will have a law on the books to withdraw the troops from Iraq. Now time is fleeting. This could have been done by Labor Day and all, I mean all the troops, would come home by Christmas.

It is a rather "simple" point and it is rather distressing that Ms. Youssef and Ms. Schoof do not bother to report it and instead go with the simplistic version which pushes the notion that, even if the Democrats wanted to end the illegal war, their hands are tied. The only ones tying the hands of Congressional Democrats are the very weak leaders. The ones providing them cover include Ms. Youssef and Ms. Schoof. Recently, McClatchy Newspapers felt the need to respond to online criticism of an article. The article was not noted here because, C.I. explained, "it was so ridiculous and potentially offensive." Yes, it was. McClatchy Newspapers electing to announce that US military deaths were falling backed up by their creative accounting was embarrassing.

In August, the original article written by Youssef, which I will not link to because we do not link to trash, argued, US military deaths fell to fifty-seven in Iraq. Fifty-seven would certainly be news especially since the reported figure of US deaths, reported by the US military, stands at 84. I am sorry that Ms. Youssef feels she was called a partisan hack for her bad reporting. I have no idea whether she is or is not a partisan hack. I would tend to doubt she is a water carrier for the administration because, while reporting from Iraq, she showed independence. Of course, partisan hacks do not simply have to be Republicans. Possibly she is a partisan hack carrying water for Democratic Congressional leadership?

Knowing her motive or motives is not necessary to call out bad reporting. What she wrote was bad reporting. She arrived at that figure of fifty-seven by eliminating all deaths announced, by the U.S. military, as "non-combat deaths." That allowed her to erase the deaths of twenty-seven U.S. service members who died in Iraq in August.

A question Ms. Youssef might need to consider is whether PTSD is a combat related illness or not? I asked Elaine and she said she certainly considers it a combat related illness in the veterans she treats and she could not imagine any psychologist who would classify it as a non-combat related illness. Some of the twenty-seven Ms. Youssef elected to eliminate may have died of suicide. Were that true, they died in a combat zone as a result of what they were witnessing. It is very doubtful, for instance, that the cancellation of The King of Queens stateside promoted the deaths.

It is equally true that Ms. Youssef appears to have no knowledge of how the twenty-seven died. She knows that they are dead, beyond that she is accepting the word of the U.S. military that the deaths were non-combat related. She is accepting the word of a U.S. military that went along with the hiding of returning bodies, refusing to allow the coffins to be photographed arriving at Dover.

Along with blindly accepting that twenty-seven deaths classified as "non-combat related" by the U.S. military are unimportant, Ms. Youssef is also so very trusting about the deaths of
Sergeant Matthew L. Tallman, Chief Warrant Officer Paul J. Flynn, Captain Corry Paul Tyler,
Specialist Rickey L. Bell, Corporal Jeremy P. Bouffard, Specialist Tyler R. Seideman, Captain Derek A. Dobogai, Staff Sergeant Jason L. Paton, Sergeant Garrett I. McLead, Specialist Jessy G. Pollard, Corporal Phillip J. Brodnick, Specialist Michael A. Hook, Corporal Joshua S. Harmon, and Corporal Nathan C. Hubbard. Those fourteen U.S. service members died in Multaka At-Ta'mim on August 22nd. How did they die? Like any of the twenty-seven Ms. Youssef designates as not worthy of counting, the U.S. military noted the deaths were 'under investigation.' The helicopter they were traveling in crashed. Ms. Youssef does not know if it was shot down. The U.S. military tends to stall on helicopter crashes and it may be six months, or more, before they fess up to the fact that a helicopter was shot down. In fact, prior to February 2007, pretty much all the press was running with the 'hard landings' nonsense and the U.S. military spin that 'insurgents' did not have the capacities to shoot down helicopters. Of course, that is a known lie today. But Ms. Youssef was perfectly happy to grab on to the U.S. military's statement that the helicopter was not shot down. That is rather strange when the helicopter crash is classified as "under investigation."

I do not need to know Ms. Youssef's motives to know that she wrote a dumb article. I do not need to know her motives to find the article insulting. There were eight-four reported deaths of U.S. service members in Iraq in the month of August. For reasons unknown. Ms. Youssef elected to eliminate twenty-seven of those deaths from the count. McClatchy Newspapers has stated their reason was because those were non-combat related deaths. All the deaths were combat related, despite McClatchy Newspapers' ignorance. Now the eighty-four, or some of them, might have died had they been in the United States. They might have been involved in an accident on a highway, they might have been killed in a mugging. They could have died any number of ways, or they might not have, but the reality is they died while serving in Iraq.

My grandson Sheldon brought the article to my attention and asked to be mentioned by name. He is a bit jealous that his cousins Tracey and Jayson get mentioned in the reports. I only mention my grandchildren by name if they give permission. Sheldon was surfing the net this week and came across a blogger reacting to McClatchy Newspapers' explanation as 'good news.' They, the blogger told his readers, were responding.

Well, by all means, if the only issue here is whether or not old media and new media can have a conversation, call it a "success." If, like me, you tend to see the erasing of twenty-seven deaths as offensive, there is no "success" to be found in the fact that McClatchy Newspapers' 'explained.' Read through the explanation and find anything that indicates they are aware of how insulting their 'methodology' was to those who lost their lives, to the families of those who lost their lives.

In fact, try to detect anything that indicates any awareness of what death actually is. McClatchy Newspapers elected to render twenty-seven deaths as unimportant. They accepted the government spin on the helicopter crash, they accepted the classifications of "non-combat related" deaths without any proof. Mark Seibel 'explains,' "We've earned a reputation for not accepting something just because someone says it's true, so being accused of uncritical reporting stings." Mr. Seibel appears to fail to grasp that in accepting, without proof, the U.S. military classification of "non-combat related, under investigation," McClatchy Newspapers was "accepting something just because someone says it's true".

A real explanation might include exactly what Ms. Youssef feels those twenty-seven deaths are since they are not, in the count she produced, the results of war. Were they victims of a renegade picnic? Eighty-four U.S. service members died in Iraq in August and Ms. Youssef eliminates twenty-seven of those deaths apparently assigning herself the role of God because it certainly not the role of journalism to merely repeat spin. Nor is it evidence of a thinking person who might feel that some of the deaths were suicides and to assume that serving in a combat zone had nothing to do with one's decision to take their own life. Does Ms. Youssef feel the deaths were "accidents"? If a helicopter crashes in a war zone, it may have been shot down and there were, in facts, reports by some eye witnesses that the helicopter was shot down. Ms. Youssef elects to ignore that as well. She elects to classify those fourteen deaths "under investigation" as non-combat related.

If a blogger wants to applaud the 'engagement' between new media and old media over this matter, he appears to have other things on his mind than the illegal war. If McClatchy Newspapers wants to avoid being called on uncritical reporting, the easiest way to avoid that is to not practice uncritical reporting.

I do not know Ms. Youssef's motives. I do know she wrote an embarrassing, ill informed article. Nothing in the 'explanation' changes that.

The same press that, at the end of July and start of August, were applauding "only 72 deaths in the month of July" when the deaths were much higher did not bother, as C.I. pointed out, to note the fact this go round that the deaths for August rose to 84. Ms. Youssef, in fact, wrote about fifty-seven deaths in August. McClatchy Newspapers does not exist in a vacuum, they exist on a press landscape. If they wanted credit for the fine work they, including Ms. Youssef, often do, they must also accept the blame for the bad work they do. Pretending that Ms. Youssef's article was not a journalistic embarrassment does not bode well for the future of McClatchy Newspapers. Pretending that an 'excuse' is good news because it demonstrates 'engagement' does not bode well for the emerging new media.










Posted by at

Iraq and the lack of attention

What's today? September 8th. Why are we emphasizing that at the start? The CBS Evening News went to Iraq and, as usual, Katie Couric got slammed not for what she did or didn't do on camera but because of Bash the Bitch. Intead of critiquing (positively or negatively) what Couric did it was time for Bash the Bitch. So while Couric went to Iraq, what did others do?


Well the Los Angeles Times has staff in Iraq. What did they do this week? Eight US service members killed, they told you, on September 6th. The seven announced dead on Friday morning? They didn't write a story. In fact, as of right now, they haven't filed from Iraq since Thursday. Care to explain that?


What happened this past week, if you paid attention, was that more and more daily papers (the few with staff that's actually in Iraq as opposed to dashing in for a day) elected to drop their Iraq coverage. Now the US administration is selling that spin that things are better. So it sure is nice of the Los Angeles Times and the New York Times (who reported the eight deaths by halfing them into four mid-week) to repeatedly avoid covering Iraq from within the country.


While our allegedly brave and independent media critics of the left were playing yet another round of Bash the Bitch, did any of them take the time to note that Iraq coverage dropped off? That even the daily roundup stories went missing?

About that 'peaceful' Friday in Iraq, yesterday, Sahar Issa (McClatchy Newspapers) reports two police officers were shot dead in Kirkuk yesterday, a kidnapped victim was released in a Toyota and rushed to the police but the car was "booby trapped," exploded and killed one Kirkuk police officer, the explosion was followed by a combined gun and mortar attack that claimed the lives of 1 police officer and 1 civilian, Hadher Hasen Mohammed (a school principal), Jaber Hasen Mohammed (his brother) and Abid Hasen Khidir were shot dead outside of Kirkuk yesterday, and Sheikh Mohammed Abdulkathim al-Garaawi was shot dead in Kufa yesterday.
Reuters notes that on that 'peaceful' Friday, "a 40-year-old woman" was shot dead in front of her home in Diwaniya, 3 police officers were shot dead in Mosul and "a woman employee in the Communications Ministry" was shot dead in Hilla in front of her home. Just "another pleasant valley Fri-daaaay. Iraqis complain about how hard life it is and the press just don't understand . . . ."


David Corn has a book review in Sunday's New York Times that's already available online. While many at his current magazine offered non-stop fluff, he kept his nose down and covered his beat seriously. Though no applause for that came from the top of the magazine (though he was called out for . . . being right by the editor and publisher), his work has been noted outside the magazine by mainstream reporters and editors. The absence of recognition for actual reporting is another sign of the fluff that's driven so much of 'independent' media of late. He has another strong report up at the magazine and when it's reposted somewhere else, we'll note it.



From this morning's New York Times, we'll note Alissa J. Rubin's "7 U.S. Soldiers Killed in 2 Attacks in Sunni Areas of Iraq:"


Seven American soldiers were killed in two separate attacks, the military announced Friday, while Iraq's president said he would vote against carrying out the death sentence of a former defense minister, Gen. Sultan Hashim Ahmed.
[. . .]
In Anbar, these groups have continued to attack American soldiers, even though many of the local Sunni Arab sheiks have turned against the militants and are working with the American military. The attack occurred in the desert outside of Haditha, a town in the western part of the province.



The independent report to Congress by a 20-member panel found that the Iraq police force needed to be disbanded and that the Iraqi army would not be up to their task for at least 12 months and possibly 18. With more on the report, this is from Richard Larnder's "Iraqis Lack Basics of Battlefield Supply" (AP):



The commission's report, released Thursday, said U.S. and coalition forces often have to make sure the Iraqis have enough fuel even though the Iraqis took over responsibility for fuel distribution months ago.
The Iraqis don't take care of their equipment -- preventive maintenance is an "alien concept," the report said. A depot in Taji, 20 miles north of Baghdad, is stocked with vehicles, ammunition, boots and uniforms, yet the commission heard frequently of Iraqi troops being unable to get the gear.

I'm noting Bill Richardson's "Why We Should Exit Iraq Now" (Washington Post):

Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John Edwards have suggested that there is little difference among us on Iraq. This is not true: I am the only leading Democratic candidate committed to getting all our troops out and doing so quickly.
In the most recent debate, I asked the other candidates how many troops they would leave in Iraq and for what purposes. I got no answers. The American people need answers. If we elect a president who thinks that troops should stay in Iraq for years, they will stay for years -- a tragic mistake.
Clinton, Obama and Edwards reflect the inside-the-Beltway thinking that a complete withdrawal of all American forces somehow would be "irresponsible." On the contrary, the facts suggest that a rapid, complete withdrawal -- not a drawn-out, Vietnam-like process -- would be the most responsible and effective course of action.
Those who think we need to keep troops in Iraq misunderstand the Middle East. I have met and negotiated successfully with many regional leaders, including Saddam Hussein. I am convinced that only a complete withdrawal can sufficiently shift the politics of Iraq and its neighbors to break the deadlock that has been killing so many people for so long.

Richardson leaves out one important point about that debate. Moderator George Steph, looking at the stage and seeing (some) differences from times past, asked bi-racial Barack Obama about his race ("races" -- but George just saw "Black") and Hillary about her gender. Then George Steph was ready to move on. Apparently, George Steph either didn't notice that Bill Richardson is Mexican-American or else he assumed Chris Dodd, Joe Biden, Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel also were Latino. A common mistake? How does ABC miss that? The same way the rest of the horse racing does as they go on and on about the "firsts" noting Hillary's a woman and that Barack's bi-racial while ignoring the first Bill Richardson brings to the race for Democratic nomination. The theme of his op-ed is also the topic of a petition he's started online calling on Democratic candidates for the 2008 presidential nomination to explain their plans regarding Iraq and how many US troops they will be leaving behind in their plans?

Carl was the first to note Margaret Kimberley's "Freedom Rider: Media 'Disappear' Dennis Kucinich" (Freedom Rider, Black Agenda Report):

Ohio Congressman Dennis Kucinich is alive, well, and free to move about as he pleases. Yet corporate media treat him like brutal dictators disappearing the opposition. They don't want voters to know that a Democratic presidential candidate will defend the citizenship rights of Americans and human rights around the world.
Kucinich was mayor of a major city, Cleveland, Ohio. He is now a six-term member of Congress and a Democratic presidential candidate for the second time. His progressive views are firmly in the mainstream, but right wing propaganda labels them unpopular. Kucinich's demand for ethical corporate behavior makes the media nervous. If he became president their bosses would have to accept a government serving the needs of citizens instead of being only at the beck and call of corporate power. Like good minions everywhere, reporters make sure the higher ups remain happy.
Kucinich has sponsored a bill to impeach Vice President Cheney, opposes any further funding of the occupation of Iraq, advocates health care for all, and exposes the lies used to justify the planned killing of thousands in Iran. His choice to live up to the values that Democrats claim has earned him only scorn and derision from the media. They use a variety of methods to disappear him, including removing his image from photos, ignoring him during debates, and simply acting as if he doesn't exist.
During the ABC sponsored debate broadcast on August 19th, George Stephanopoulos did not ask Kucinich a single question until nearly 30 minutes had elapsed and then asked him fewer questions than he asked any other candidate. As if the blatant lack of attention were not bad enough, ABC literally took Kucinich out of the picture. ABC displayed an Associated Press photo on its website that purported to show the Democratic candidates, but Kucinich's image was no where to be seen.

Rachel notes two upcoming programs on WBAI (broadcasting out of NYC and available to online listeners as well)

Sunday, September 9, 11am-noon
THE NEXT HOUR
Celebrating the 50th anniversary of the publication of Jack Kerouac's "On the Road," with Regina Weinreich (Beat scholar and editor of Kerouac's collected haikus); Joyce Johnson (author of the Kerouac memoirs "Door Wide Open" and the newly re-issued "Minor Characters"); Tim Moran (editor of "You'll Be All Right," the newly published memoirs of first wife Edie Parker Kerouac; and John Leland (author of "Why Kerouac Matters"). Hosted by Janet Coleman.

Monday, September 10, 2-3pm
CAT RADIO CAFE
Writer Kate Christensen on "The Great Man," her novel on the afterlife of a famous painter; a trio of actors playing Palestinian brothers in "Masked," a play by Israeli playwright Ilan Hatsor; and members of New York City's Life Fund discuss a gala benefit. Hosted by Janet Coleman and David Dozer.

The following community sites have updated since Friday morning:

Rebecca's Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitude;
Cedric's Cedric's Big Mix;
Kat's Kat's Korner;
Betty's Thomas Friedman is a Great Man;
Mike's Mikey Likes It!;
Elaine's Like Maria Said Paz;
Wally's The Daily Jot;
and Trina's Trina's Kitchen


We'll close with this from Nancy A. Youssef Renee Renee Schoof's "Despite Iraq reports, troops' future is set" (McClatchy Newspapers):

No matter what Army Gen. David Petraeus tells Congress about the surge in Iraq on Monday, the course for U.S. troops there is already set: Next April, the 30,000 troops who were added this year will begin coming home.
Despite the dueling statistics, the media spin and the maneuvering on Capitol Hill and the campaign trail, no dramatic change in U.S. policy is likely before that, however.

The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.



















Posted by at

Friday, September 07, 2007

Iraq snapshot

Friday, September 7, 2007. Chaos and violence continue, the US military announces multiple deaths, the British announce a death, Riverbend makes it to Syria, Adam Kokesh gets arrested with Tina Richards for the 'crime' of posting fliers, Ali al-Fadhily reports on a battle that the press has missed thus far, and more.


Starting with war resisters. Daryl Shandro (Political Affairs) reports on how the influx of war resisters into Canada has created the need for new chapters to be created (they were -- Ottawa, Kingston, Hamilton and London) and shares how war resister Steve Yoczik spoke informatively and amusingly about his own experience to a group in Sudbury: "Steve waged a concerted bid to be kicked out of the army. Over a period of months, he deliberately failed between 50 and 100 physical tests. When it became obvious that the officers would not file three consecutive failing reports so as to have his status reviewed, Steve started to fail to appear for the tests and was flippant, if not outright insubordinate, if these absences brought any reporach. Steve figures he was gone for a while before anyone realized that he was AWOL. He found out about the War Resisters Support Campaign in Canada through a friend -- a model soldier and US patriot who disagreed so strongly with the war in Iraq that he fled to Canada rather than participate in it." Shandro notes Jeremy Hinzman and Brandon Hughey's appeals to Canada's Supreme Court and that the "continues to lobby for the political solution: these War Resisters must be given sanctuary under a separate immigration category, much like the US war resisters of the Vietnam era received under the Trudeau government. In Sudbuy we are now fielding a serious inquiry every week from War Resisters. These are people 'checking into' Toronot and then moving to their host city within hours or days. They are calling from Germany (military hosipital) and bases all over the continental U.S., and they are coming. In Toronto the serious inquiries are about three a week; arrivals, both anticipated and unanticipated, are becoming more and more frequent."

Ehren Watada is also resisting the Iraq War. In June 2006, he became the first known officer to publicly refuse to deploy the war (he cited the illegal nature of the war). In February of this year, Judge Toilet (aka John Head) presided over the court-martial of Watada. Watada had elected to go with a jury of his peers. Judge Toilet saw Watada's case was being made for him by the prosecution witness and attempted to flush justice by delcaring a mistrial -- over defense objection and over the initial objection of the prosecution -- Toilet had to coax the prosecution into seeing that what he was offering was a 'do over.' However, the Constitution does not allow for 'do overs' and, as National Lawyers Guild president Marjorie Cohn has noted, double-jeopardy had already attached. Currently, Watada is due to stand for another court-martial next month. The appeals process are ongoing. Judge Toilet has said there is no double-jeopary and that he can be impartial and should be allowed to sit on a second court-martial. Howls of laughter echo through the land at both assertions. Last month, we noted the Japanese American Citizens League (JACL)'s statement regarding Watada. On Wednesday, Caroline Aoyagi-Strom (New American Media) noted the JACL's statement and the struggle it took to get that weak statement and notes Mas Hashimoto declaring, "Today we are at a crossroads. What kind of organization are we going to be? We need to take a stand, a firm and dedicated stand." while Alan Nishi declares, "We should take a more solid stance than we have in the past." The stand taken thus far is to note that Watada has civil rights and that he is "protected from double jeopardy" and, as Aoyagi-Strom notes, JALC is now supposed "to help educate other groups on the controversial issue."



There is a growing movement of resistance within the US military which includes Timothy Richard, Robert Weiss, Phil McDowell, Steve Yoczik, Ross Spears, Zamesha Dominique, Jared Hood, James Burmeister, Eli Israel, Joshua Key, Ehren Watada, Terri Johnson, Carla Gomez, Luke Kamunen, Leif Kamunen, Leo Kamunen, Camilo Mejia, Kimberly Rivera, Dean Walcott, Linjamin Mull, Agustin Aguayo, Justin Colby, Marc Train, Abdullah Webster, Robert Zabala, Darrell Anderson, Kyle Snyder, Corey Glass, Jeremy Hinzman, Kevin Lee, Mark Wilkerson, Patrick Hart, Ricky Clousing, Ivan Brobeck, Aidan Delgado, Pablo Paredes, Carl Webb, Stephen Funk, Clifton Hicks, David Sanders, Dan Felushko,Brandon Hughey, Clifford Cornell, Joshua Despain, Joshua Casteel, Katherine Jashinski, Dale Bartell, Chris Teske, Matt Lowell, Jimmy Massey, Chris Capps, Tim Richard, Hart Viges, Michael Blake, Christopher Mogwai, Christian Kjar, Kyle Huwer, Vincent La Volpa, DeShawn Reed and Kevin Benderman. In total, forty-one US war resisters in Canada have applied for asylum.

Information on war resistance within the military can be found at The Objector, The G.I. Rights Hotline, Iraq Veterans Against the War and the War Resisters Support Campaign. Courage to Resist offers information on all public war resisters. Tom Joad maintains a list of known war resisters. The G.I. Rights Hotline link has been included in the snapshots forever now, but please note that this is a new website. The new website is still being upgarded (but working) and with the new website comes a new phone number (877) 4474487 which is "GI RGHTS" the name but missing the second "I". To make sure everyone's aware that there is a new number and a new (toll free) number, we'll included this notice in the snapshot all week. Again, The G.I. Rights Hotline is a new and improved (and new and improving) website that will begin replacing the old site.

Last month, NOW with David Brancaccio covered war resisters Agustin Aguayo and James Burmeister. Tonight (in most PBS markets, the program airs tonight) NOW with David Brancaccio examines the issue of sexual abuse in the military:


Roughly one in seven of America's active duty military soldiers is a woman, but a NOW investigation found that sexual assault and rape is widespread. One study of National Guard and Reserve forces found that almost one in four women had been assaulted or raped. Last year alone, almost 3,000 soldiers reported sexual assault and rape by other soldiers. On Friday, September 7 (check your local listings), in one of the only national television broadcasts of the issue, NOW features women who speak out for the first time about what happened. One woman recounts her ordeal of rape by her superior officer. Many more don't report the incidents for fear of how it will affect their careers. The shocking phenomenon has a label: military sexual trauma, or MST. NOW meets women courageously battling to overcome their MST, bringing light to an issue that's putting the army in shame. A NOW exclusive investigation. The NOW website at www.pbs.org/now will offer the latest statistics on MST and insight into the challenges of reporting sexual abuse in the military

Online, NOW with David Branccacio has a fact sheet regarding the percentages. Some that should immediately stand out include "60% of women have experienced military sexual trauma" and "23% of women have experienced military sexual assault." (27% of males have also "experienced military sexual trauma".) Also online, they interview (text) Kate Summers (Miles Foundation) about the issue and offer advice from Rev. Dorthy Mackey: "I encourage any survivor of sexual abuse in the military to immediately contact family or friends who love them. Tell them the complete sotry of the facts, have them record or get e-mails of the facts from the survivor. These friends and family who are not traumatized must be willing to act as guides/support and spokesperson for the survivor. Within the military system, the already traumatized survivor is lost. Once the covert or overt hostility begins, the survivor is multiply re-victimized." Rev. Mackey founded Survivors Take Action Against Abuse by Military Personnel, served nine years in the Air Force and, as she discussed with Amy Goodman (Democracy Now!) in July of 2004, was raped three times, "twice by military doctors during appointments. Rev. Mackey explained to Goodman, "So there's a lot more to this, and yet no one wants to invite those of us who know. And one of the moves on right now is to have the Pentagon itself establish a victim's advocacy office. I would hate to tell you, but from the Congressional Congress' own lips, the Women's Congressional Congress' own lips, they said, as we have been telling them, that rapists keep getting promoted into the senior ranks. Up into the Pentagon. And when you have the Pentagon itself, who has refused any recommendations in the last 16 years with 19 task forces of sexual misconduct, it's not being addressed. What's going to happen is the same that many of us who've lived through it have seen, and they will typically shut down these victims even more so. I mean, a nice term they really should do for this victim's advocacy office they're considering, call it the Pentagon's Lobotomy Shop, because that's what it will be for these victims."

More recently, Traci Hukill (The Progressive, January 2007) examined the issue and offered many important details such as: "Last year, the Pentagon received reports of 2,374 rapes or attempted rapes from all of its bases worldwide, about 40 percent more than the year before. But that's probably just a fraction of the real number. One reason the crime still goes unreported may lurk in the annual [Pentago] report: Last year, just seventy-nine servicemembers were court-martialed for sexual assault. Why bother reporting if nothing will happen to the perpetrator?"

The most famous example of sexual abuse and command rape during this illegal war is Suzanne Swift. Swift attempted to work through military channels. Nothing was done. Finally, 'help' was offering her a class on how women could work not to 'invite' rape and abuse. Swift self-checked out when she returned from Iraq. She was taken from her mother's home in handcuffs. The military wanted the entire matter to go away. Even their white wash investigation verified some of the details of assault. Instead of doing the honorable thing and immediately discharge Swift (with full benefits and an honorable discharge), the US military elected to punish her. Sarah Rich, her mother, continues to fight for her daughter and other victims of sexual assault. The US Congress continues to pretend that nothing happened to Swift and that, if it did, it's not like they have oversight of the military.

Not content to be useless, a number are gearing up for DC actions this month. Paul Schwartzman (Washington Post) reports that in Lafayette Square Thursday, the police staged a big rollout to disrupt a press conference and 'deal' with the very important 'crime' of sign posting. One police officer attempted to 'disarm' Tina Richards who held menacing glue (wheat paste). Schwartman reports, "A few feet away, Kristine Klein, 13, Richards's daughter, started crying. She said that another officer had grabbed her arm and pushed her. As Richards tried to call to her daughter from the cruiser, another officer closed the window." What a proud moment for DC police. They also nabbed Adam Kokesh and Ian Thompson. Don't you feel safer? The three were charged with "defacing public property." Descrating the Constitution is a-okay in DC which is why Bully Boy's still sitting pretty and not facing impeachment. But try to post a flier, and it's SWAT time. The Times of India quotes A.N.S.W.E.R.'s Brian Becker declaring, "The police suppressed the press conference. In the middle of the speeches, they grabbed the podium. Then, mounted police charged the media present to disperse them." The Times of India notes, "The charge caused a peaceful crowd of some 20 journalists and four or five protestors to scatter in terror, an AFP correspondent at the event in Layfayette Square said." The press conference was intended to get the word out on the actions in DC beginning September 15th with a march and a die-in. A.N.S.W.E.R. has a press release with photos and note the police officer pulling Kokesh's left arm behind his back to save the capital from . . . a posted flier. A video is posted on YouTube. You'll hear chatter about "a national security threat" as DC police swarm in. You'll see a police officer jerk Tina Richards by her arm repeatedly, call for "backup" over his radio before grabbing the bucket of paste. Backup takes a while to arrive (with sirens). Then a real idiot on horseback comes galloping up screeching, "Back up, folks, back up, back up, back up, back up" over and over like the idiot he is. The entire point was to disrupt the statements that Tina Richards was making to the press at the time.

Richards and Kokesh do not represent a minority view in the US. Nor are they in the minority around the world. A new BBC poll of 22 countries has found 39% say troops home right now and another "28% backed a gradual pull-out" while only 23% declared US troops should "stay until Iraq was safe".

And yet . . . yesterday came the news from the US Pentagon that the number of US forces in Iraq had reached 168,000 and were expected to rise to 172,000 shortly. Before Democrats won control of both houses in the US Congress in the November 2006 elections and before the US Congress was sworn in (January 2007) the number of US troops in Iraq was approximately 144,000. Robin Wright and Jonathan Weisman (Washington Post) report that US General and White House spokesperson David Petraeus is reportedly showing "a willingness to consider a drawdown of one brigade of between 3,500 and 4,500 US troops from Iraq early next year" and that Fancy Nancy Pelosi (Speaker of the House) and her right hand, Steny Hoyer, are yet again throwing in the towel with Hoyer stating, "Clearly we don't have the numbers to override the president's vetoes, as has been clearly demonstrated, nor do we expect to for a long time." Amy Goodman (Democracy Now!) also notes the cowardice in Congress: "On Capitol Hill, the Democratic leadership appears set to give up its efforts on setting a deadline for the withdrawal of troops from Iraq. The Senate is expected to vote on a bill later this month that would call for withdrawal to begin this year but it would include no language on when the troop withdrawal had to be completed." Susan Cornwell (Reuters) reports US Senator Dick Durbin gave a speech today where he declared: "This Congress can't give President (George W.) Bush another blank check for Iraq. I can't support an open-ended appropriation which allows this president to continue this failed policy." While it's great that Durbin realizes Congress did give Bully Boy a "blank check," he'll need more than straight talk to combat his own party's rush to cave again.

Outside the spineless DC bubble, Greg Mitchell (Editor & Publisher) quotes Cathy Fish, mother of John Fish III, explaining, "Three weeks ago I was hugging a happy loving wonderful son. And now as you can see . . . I've got pictures." John Fish committed sucide after returning from Iraq.


It's Friday which means news of violence trickles out slowly. So we'll start out with Ali al-Fadhily (IPS) reporting that Samarra has been the site of fighting between the US and Iraqis beginning August 26th when, an Iraqi explains, "there was fierce fighting between armed men and American forces in the Armooshiya district, and I saw Americans evacuate many of their soldiers by stretchers. As usual, Americans took revenge by bombing the district." Iman, an Iraqi woman, tells Fadhily that a US bombing "killed a woman with her seven children" and that the violence has been confirmed in a statement from the Muslim Scholars Association
while the associations Sheikh Taha tells al-Fadhily, "They think their crimes would stop Iraqis from demanding their rights for liberty and prosperity, but the results are always different from what the American leaders hope. They are only pushing more Iraqis to be armed against them, and you can see that the facts on the ground are the opposite of what they tell their people. Their soldiers are getting killed every day and they (U.S. military) are losing in Iraq."
In the small reported violence that will lead to many filing reports of "Yesterday in . . ." tomorrow . . .

Bombings?

Robert H. Reid (AP) reports in 'peaceful' Al Anbar Province, the 'model' Bully Boy touts, "two suspension bridges" were blown up and brought to five the number of bridges in Al Anbar Province blown up this year..

Shootings?

Hussein Kadhim (McClatchy Newspapers) reports Dwood Salman ("member of the municipality council") was shot dead outside of his home in Suleiman Beck.

Corpses?

Hussein Kadhim (McClatchy Newspapers) reports 8 corpses were discovered in Baghdad.

Today the US military announced: "Three Task Force Lightning Soldiers were killed in Nineveh province Thursday when an explosion occurred near their vehicle." And they announced: "Four Marines assigned to Multi National Force-West were killed Sept. 6 while conducting combat operations in Al Anbar Province." ICCC lists the total number for US service members who have died in the illegal war at 3760 and, for the month thus far, at 18. And four of the seven deaths were in Al Anbar Province, the 'model' province.

Today the UK Ministry of Defence announced: "It is with deep sadness that the MOD must confirm the death of a British soldier from the Parachute Regiment in Iraq on Wednesday 5, September 2007. The soldier sustained fatal injuries in the early hours of Wednesday while conducting routine operations". The death bringsthe number of United Kingdom troops killed in Iraq to 169.


In other news, the Online Predator has turned his attention away from underage girls and is now attacking Katie Couric online. One might wonder why he hates all women were it not for the howls of laughter at his latest blunder -- which should make everyone wonder about his previous 'facts' on Iran. Let's quote Pig Predator: "CBS is owned by General Electric. GE is working hard to get favorable trading status with any number of foreign trading partners. The U.S. trade representative is working hard on GE's behalf." GE owns NBC. Facts are tough, eh, Online Predator? [FYI, The Progressive's Matthew Rothschild -- who has not engaged in Bash the Bitch -- has posted the efforts CBS' Early Show took, while on location, to avoid allowing people against the illegal war to be on camera in the background.] So CBS Evening News went to Iraq and did any of the critics watch? Apparently not. Probably Piggy Pedophile tried to. He probably pulled the lever down on his GE toaster and got confused when no picture came on.

Yesterday, Katie Couric (CBS Evening News) interviewed Syrian president Bashar Assad who responded to the charges that the Syrian government was funding, training or whatever else the US military brass wants to offer as the current justification for the failure of the illegal war (it failed because it was illegal), "What do they do, those terrorists in Iraq? They kill civilians, they create chaos. What interest have Syria in having chaos in Iraq? Chaos is contagious. If we help the chaos in Iraq, this means we we work against our interest. So we do our best to control our borders, first of all for Syrians; second, for the Iraqis; third, for the region." This morning Amy Goodman (Democracy Now!) reported that "Israeli Air Force jets purportedly entered Syrian airspace" and Syria fired back. So you might think some of the 'critics' would take a moment to check out yesterday's interview with the president of Syria. However, you would be wrong.

Couric interviewed Assad and Iraq was the topic. Assad explained that Syria pays "the price for the chaos in Iraq today," criticized the US administration for attempting to respond to political situations with military non-answers, and observed, "It's getting worse every day, nothing is better. Sometimes it gets better, but it's like a flash in the pan; it just disappears, it's transient. We're talking about the result, the chaos is worse, the killing is worse than before. . . ." Assad also declared his belief that US troops should leave Iraq pointing out that "after four years . . . every day is getting worse than before. So I cannot say that American forces will bring stability to Iraq."

It's cute the way another round of Bash the Bitch allows alleged 'media critics' to ignore the fact that one of the biggest complaints about network news is the decrease in international coverage but a whole crowd ignored an interview on Iraq with the president of one of Iraq's neighboring countries. Same way they didn't appear to notice the slack off in coverage from Iraq by Los Angeles Times and New York Times correspondents this week (most noticeable today).

Syria is where Riverbend is now. The Iraqi blogger of Baghdad Burning recounts how she and her family waited and waited for the safest time to make their journey and she writes:

The tears had stopped about an hour after we'd left Baghdad. Just seeing the dirty streets, the ruins of buildings and houses, the smoke-filled horizon all helped me realize how fortunate I was to have a chance for something safer.
By the time we were out of Baghdad, my heart was no longer aching as it had been while we were still leaving it. The cars around us on the border were making me nervous. I hated being in the middle of so many possibly explosive vehicles. A part of me wanted to study the faces of the people around me, mostly families, and the other part of me, the one that's been trained to stay out of trouble the last four years, told me to keep my eyes to myself- it was almost over.
It was finally our turn. I sat stiffly in the car and waited as money passed hands; our passports were looked over and finally stamped. We were ushered along and the driver smiled with satisfaction, "It's been an easy trip, Alhamdulillah," he said cheerfully.
As we crossed the border and saw the last of the Iraqi flags, the tears began again. The car was silent except for the prattling of the driver who was telling us stories of escapades he had while crossing the border. I sneaked a look at my mother sitting beside me and her tears were flowing as well. There was simply nothing to say as we left Iraq. I wanted to sob, but I didn't want to seem like a baby. I didn't want the driver to think I was ungrateful for the chance to leave what had become a hellish place over the last four and a half years.


Riverbend and her family join over 4 million Iraqi refugees (internal and external) whom the illegal war has 'liberated'. Relief Web released a new study today on the refugee crisis
noting that their numbers increase "[a]s the security situation continues to deteriorate inside Iraq, human displacement escalates to levels unparalleled in the region" and that it threatens the entire region. The report notes: "The exodus of Iraq's professionals has led to severe brain drain, hitting the health, education, and government sectors particularly hard. This will have serious implications for Iraq's ability to rebuild the country when the violence decreases. Internal displacement is resulting in ethnic and sectarian homogenization of the country, and displaced communities are increasingly vulnerable to violence, kidnappings, and control by militias. Displacement is both a consequence and a cause of sectarian polarization in the country. Jordan and Syria now face internal security threats related to the immense economic burden of hosting the Iraqi populations, new sectarian demographics, tension among host and refugee populations as well as across sectarian divides, the potential of increased regime opposition, and the possibility that refugees will be recruited into armed militias if humanitarian assistance isn't sufficient to meet their needs."



Unrelated note, Michael Ratner (Center for Constitutional Rights, co-host of Law and Disorder) has a website entitled Just Left. Community member Jonah noted that we plug things in the snapshot from time to time and asked if that could be worked in.

iraq
ehren watada
now with david branccacio
pbs
democracy now
amy goodman
adam kokesh
iraq veterans against the war
riverbend
the washington post
Posted by at

Iraq snapshot

Friday, September 7, 2007.  Chaos and violence continue, the US military announces multiple deaths, the British announce a death, Riverbend makes it to Syria, Adam Kokesh gets arrested with Tina Richards for the 'crime' of posting fliers, Ali al-Fadhily reports on a battle that the press has missed thus far, and more.
 
 
Starting with war resisters.  Daryl Shandro (Political Affairs) reports on how the influx of war resisters into Canada has created the need for new chapters to be created (they were -- Ottawa, Kingston, Hamilton and London) and shares how war resister Steve Yoczik spoke informatively and amusingly about his own experience to a group in Sudbury: "Steve waged a concerted bid to be kicked out of the army.  Over a period of months, he deliberately failed between 50 and 100 physical tests.  When it became obvious that the officers would not file three consecutive failing reports so as to have his status reviewed, Steve started to fail to appear for the tests and was flippant, if not outright insubordinate, if these absences brought any reporach.  Steve figures he was gone for a while before anyone realized that he was AWOL.  He found out about the War Resisters Support Campaign in Canada through a friend -- a model soldier and US patriot who disagreed so strongly with the war in Iraq that he fled to Canada rather than participate in it."  Shandro notes Jeremy Hinzman and Brandon Hughey's appeals to Canada's Supreme Court and that the  "continues to lobby for the political solution: these War Resisters must be given sanctuary under a separate immigration category, much like the US war resisters of the Vietnam era received under the Trudeau government.  In Sudbuy we are now fielding a serious inquiry every week from War Resisters.  These are people 'checking into' Toronot and then moving to their host city within hours or days.  They are calling from Germany (military hosipital) and bases all over the continental U.S., and they are coming.  In Toronto the serious inquiries are about three a week; arrivals, both anticipated and unanticipated, are becoming more and more frequent."
 
Ehren Watada is also resisting the Iraq War.  In June 2006, he became the first known officer to publicly refuse to deploy the war (he cited the illegal nature of the war).  In February of this year, Judge Toilet (aka John Head) presided over the court-martial of Watada.  Watada had elected to go with a jury of his peers.  Judge Toilet saw Watada's case was being made for him by the prosecution witness and attempted to flush justice by delcaring a mistrial -- over defense objection and over the initial objection of the prosecution -- Toilet had to coax the prosecution into seeing that what he was offering was a 'do over.'  However, the Constitution does not allow for 'do overs' and, as National Lawyers Guild president Marjorie Cohn has noted, double-jeopardy had already attached.  Currently, Watada is due to stand for another court-martial next month.  The appeals process are ongoing.  Judge Toilet has said there is no double-jeopary and that he can be impartial and should be allowed to sit on a second court-martial.  Howls of laughter echo through the land at both assertions.  Last month, we noted the  Japanese American Citizens League (JACL)'s statement regarding Watada.  On Wednesday, Caroline Aoyagi-Strom (New American Media) noted the JACL's statement and the struggle it took to get that weak statement and notes Mas Hashimoto declaring, "Today we are at a crossroads.  What kind of organization are we going to be?  We need to take a stand, a firm and dedicated stand." while Alan Nishi declares, "We should take a more solid stance than we have in the past."  The stand taken thus far is to note that Watada has civil rights and that he is "protected from double jeopardy" and, as Aoyagi-Strom notes, JALC is now supposed "to help educate other groups on the controversial issue."
 
 
 
There is a growing movement of resistance within the US military which includes Timothy Richard, Robert Weiss, Phil McDowell, Steve Yoczik, Ross Spears, Zamesha Dominique, Jared Hood, James Burmeister, Eli Israel, Joshua Key, Ehren Watada, Terri Johnson, Carla Gomez, Luke Kamunen, Leif Kamunen, Leo Kamunen, Camilo Mejia, Kimberly Rivera, Dean Walcott, Linjamin Mull, Agustin Aguayo, Justin Colby, Marc Train, Abdullah Webster, Robert Zabala, Darrell Anderson, Kyle Snyder, Corey Glass, Jeremy Hinzman, Kevin Lee, Mark Wilkerson, Patrick Hart, Ricky Clousing, Ivan Brobeck, Aidan Delgado, Pablo Paredes, Carl Webb, Stephen Funk, Clifton Hicks, David Sanders, Dan Felushko,Brandon Hughey, Clifford Cornell, Joshua Despain, Joshua Casteel, Katherine Jashinski, Dale Bartell, Chris Teske, Matt Lowell, Jimmy Massey, Chris Capps, Tim Richard, Hart Viges, Michael Blake, Christopher Mogwai, Christian Kjar, Kyle Huwer, Vincent La Volpa, DeShawn Reed and Kevin Benderman. In total, forty-one US war resisters in Canada have applied for asylum.

Information on war resistance within the military can be found at The Objector, The G.I. Rights Hotline, Iraq Veterans Against the War and the War Resisters Support Campaign. Courage to Resist offers information on all public war resisters. Tom Joad maintains a list of known war resisters.  The G.I. Rights Hotline link has been included in the snapshots forever now, but please note that this is a new website.  The new website is still being upgarded (but working) and with the new website comes a new phone number (877) 4474487 which is "GI RGHTS" the name but missing the second "I".  To make sure everyone's aware that there is a new number and a new (toll free) number, we'll included this notice in the snapshot all week.  Again, The G.I. Rights Hotline is a new and improved (and new and improving) website that will begin replacing the old site.
 
Last month, NOW with David Brancaccio covered war resisters Agustin Aguayo and James Burmeister.  Tonight (in most PBS markets, the program airs tonight) NOW with David Brancaccio examines the issue of sexual abuse in the military:
 
 
Roughly one in seven of America's active duty military soldiers is a woman, but a NOW investigation found that sexual assault and rape is widespread. One study of National Guard and Reserve forces found that almost one in four women had been assaulted or raped. Last year alone, almost 3,000 soldiers reported sexual assault and rape by other soldiers.

On Friday, September 7 (check your local listings), in one of the only national television broadcasts of the issue, NOW features women who speak out for the first time about what happened. One woman recounts her ordeal of rape by her superior officer. Many more don't report the incidents for fear of how it will affect their careers. The shocking phenomenon has a label: military sexual trauma, or MST.

NOW meets women courageously battling to overcome their MST, bringing light to an issue that's putting the army in shame. A NOW exclusive investigation. The NOW website at www.pbs.org/now will offer the latest statistics on MST and insight into the challenges of reporting sexual abuse in the military
 
Online, NOW with David Branccacio has a fact sheet regarding the  percentages. Some that should immediately stand out include "60% of women have experienced military sexual trauma" and "23% of women have experienced military sexual assault." (27% of males have also "experienced military sexual trauma".)  Also online, they interview (text) Kate Summers (Miles Foundation) about the issue and offer advice from Rev. Dorthy Mackey: "I encourage any survivor of sexual abuse in the military to immediately contact family or friends who love them.  Tell them the complete sotry of the facts, have them record or get e-mails of the facts from the survivor.  These friends and family who are not traumatized must be willing to act as guides/support and spokesperson for the survivor.  Within the military system, the already traumatized survivor is lost.  Once the covert or overt hostility begins, the survivor is multiply re-victimized."  Rev. Mackey founded Survivors Take Action Against Abuse by Military Personnel, served nine years in the Air Force and, as she discussed with Amy Goodman (Democracy Now!) in July of 2004, was raped three times, "twice by military doctors during appointments.  Rev. Mackey explained to Goodman, "So there's a lot more to this, and yet no one wants to invite those of us who know.  And one of the moves on right now is to have the Pentagon itself establish a victim's advocacy office.  I would hate to tell you, but from the Congressional Congress' own lips, the Women's Congressional Congress' own lips, they said, as we have been telling them, that rapists keep getting promoted into the senior ranks.  Up into the Pentagon.  And when you have the Pentagon itself, who has refused any recommendations in the last 16 years with 19 task forces of sexual misconduct, it's not being addressed.  What's going to happen is the same that many of us who've lived through it have seen, and they will typically shut down these victims even more so.  I mean, a nice term they really should do for this victim's advocacy office they're considering, call it the Pentagon's Lobotomy Shop, because that's what it will be for these victims."
 
More recently, Traci Hukill (The Progressive, January 2007) examined the issue and offered many important details such as: "Last year, the Pentagon received reports of 2,374 rapes or attempted rapes from all of its bases worldwide, about 40 percent more than the year before.  But that's probably just a fraction of the real number. One reason the crime still goes unreported may lurk in the annual [Pentago] report: Last year, just seventy-nine servicemembers were court-martialed for sexual assault.  Why bother reporting if nothing will happen to the perpetrator?"
 
The most famous example of sexual abuse and command rape during this illegal war is Suzanne Swift.  Swift attempted to work through military channels.  Nothing was done.  Finally, 'help' was offering her a class on how women could work not to 'invite' rape and abuse.  Swift self-checked out when she returned from Iraq.  She was taken from her mother's home in handcuffs.  The military wanted the entire matter to go away.  Even their white wash investigation verified some of the details of assault.  Instead of doing the honorable thing and immediately discharge Swift (with full benefits and an honorable discharge), the US military elected to punish her.  Sarah Rich, her mother, continues to fight for her daughter and other victims of sexual assault.  The US Congress continues to pretend that nothing happened to Swift and that, if it did, it's not like they have oversight of the military. 
 
Not content to be useless, a number are gearing up for DC actions this month.  Paul Schwartzman (Washington Post) reports that in Lafayette Square Thursday, the police staged a big rollout to disrupt a press conference and 'deal' with the very important 'crime' of sign posting.   One police officer attempted to 'disarm'  Tina Richards who held menacing glue (wheat paste).  Schwartman reports, "A few feet away, Kristine Klein, 13, Richards's daughter, started crying.  She said that another officer had grabbed her arm and pushed her.  As Richards tried to call to her daughter from the cruiser, another officer closed the window."  What a proud moment for DC police.  They also nabbed Adam Kokesh and Ian Thompson.  Don't you feel safer?  The three were charged with "defacing public property."  Descrating the Constitution is a-okay in DC which is why Bully Boy's still sitting pretty and not facing impeachment.  But try to post a flier, and it's SWAT time.  The Times of India quotes A.N.S.W.E.R.'s Brian Becker declaring, "The police suppressed the press conference.  In the middle of the speeches, they grabbed the podium.  Then, mounted police charged the media present to disperse them."  The Times of India notes, "The charge caused a peaceful crowd of some 20 journalists and four or five protestors to scatter in terror, an AFP correspondent at the event in Layfayette Square said."  The press conference was intended to get the word out on the actions in DC beginning September 15th with a march and a die-in.  A.N.S.W.E.R. has a press release with photos and note the police officer pulling Kokesh's left arm behind his back to save the capital from . . . a posted flier.  A video is posted on YouTube.  You'll hear chatter about "a national security threat" as DC police swarm in.  You'll see a police officer jerk Tina Richards by her arm repeatedly, call for "backup" over his radio before grabbing the bucket of paste.  Backup takes a while to arrive (with sirens).  Then a real idiot on horseback comes galloping up screeching, "Back up, folks, back up, back up, back up, back up" over and over like the idiot he is.  The entire point was to disrupt the statements that Tina Richards was making to the press at the time.
 
Richards and Kokesh do not represent a minority view in the US.  Nor are they in the minority around the world.  A new BBC poll of 22 countries has found 39% say troops home right now and another "28% backed a gradual pull-out" while only 23% declared US troops should "stay until Iraq was safe".
 
And yet . . . yesterday came the news from the US Pentagon that the number of US forces in Iraq had reached 168,000 and were expected to rise to 172,000 shortly.  Before Democrats won control of both houses in the US Congress in the November 2006 elections and before the US Congress was sworn in (January 2007) the number of US troops in Iraq was approximately 144,000.  Robin Wright and Jonathan Weisman (Washington Post) report that US General and White House spokesperson David Petraeus is reportedly showing "a willingness to consider a drawdown of one brigade of between 3,500 and 4,500 US troops from Iraq early next year" and that Fancy Nancy Pelosi (Speaker of the House) and her right hand, Steny Hoyer, are yet again throwing in the towel with Hoyer stating, "Clearly we don't have the numbers to override the president's vetoes, as has been clearly demonstrated, nor do we expect to for a long time."   Amy Goodman (Democracy Now!) also notes the cowardice in Congress: "On Capitol Hill, the Democratic leadership appears set to give up its efforts on setting a deadline for the withdrawal of troops from Iraq. The Senate is expected to vote on a bill later this month that would call for withdrawal to begin this year but it would include no language on when the troop withdrawal had to be completed."  Susan Cornwell (Reuters) reports US Senator Dick Durbin gave a speech today where he declared: "This Congress can't give President (George W.) Bush another blank check for Iraq. I can't support an open-ended appropriation which allows this president to continue this failed policy."  While it's great that Durbin realizes Congress did give Bully Boy a "blank check," he'll need more than straight talk to combat his own party's rush to cave again.
 
Outside the spineless DC bubble, Greg Mitchell (Editor & Publisher) quotes Cathy Fish, mother of John Fish III, explaining, "Three weeks ago I was hugging a happy loving wonderful son.  And now as you can see . . . I've got pictures."  John Fish committed sucide after returning from Iraq.
 
 
It's Friday which means news of violence trickles out slowly.  So we'll start out with Ali al-Fadhily (IPS) reporting that Samarra has been the site of fighting between the US and Iraqis beginning August 26th when, an Iraqi explains, "there was fierce fighting between armed men and American forces in the Armooshiya district, and I saw Americans evacuate many of their soldiers by stretchers. As usual, Americans took revenge by bombing the district."  Iman, an Iraqi woman, tells Fadhily that a US bombing "killed a woman with her seven children" and that the violence has been confirmed in a statement from the Muslim Scholars Association
while the associations Sheikh Taha tells al-Fadhily, "They think their crimes would stop Iraqis from demanding their rights for liberty and prosperity, but the results are always different from what the American leaders hope. They are only pushing more Iraqis to be armed against them, and you can see that the facts on the ground are the opposite of what they tell their people. Their soldiers are getting killed every day and they (U.S. military) are losing in Iraq."
In the small reported violence that will lead to many filing reports of "Yesterday in . . ." tomorrow . . .
 
Bombings?

Robert H. Reid (AP) reports in 'peaceful' Al Anbar Province, the 'model' Bully Boy touts, "two suspension bridges" were blown up and brought to five the number of bridges in Al Anbar Province blown up this year..
 
Shootings?
 
Hussein Kadhim (McClatchy Newspapers) reports Dwood Salman ("member of the municipality council") was shot dead outside of his home in Suleiman Beck.
 
Corpses?
 
Hussein Kadhim (McClatchy Newspapers) reports 8 corpses were discovered in Baghdad.
 
Today the US military announced: "Three Task Force Lightning Soldiers were killed in Nineveh province Thursday when an explosion occurred near their vehicle." And they announced: "Four Marines assigned to Multi National Force-West were killed Sept. 6 while conducting combat operations in Al Anbar Province." ICCC lists the total number for US service members who have died in the illegal war at 3760 and, for the month thus far, at 18. And four of the seven deaths were in Al Anbar Province, the 'model' province.
 
Today the UK Ministry of Defence announced: "It is with deep sadness that the MOD must confirm the death of a British soldier from the Parachute Regiment in Iraq on Wednesday 5, September 2007.  The soldier sustained fatal injuries in the early hours of Wednesday while conducting routine operations".  The death bringsthe number of United Kingdom troops killed in Iraq to 169.
 
 
In other news, the Online Predator has turned his attention away from underage girls and is now attacking Katie Couric online.  One might wonder why he hates all women were it not for the howls of laughter at his latest blunder -- which should make everyone wonder about his previous 'facts' on Iran.  Let's quote Pig Predator:  "CBS is owned by General Electric.  GE is working hard to get favorable trading status with any number of foreign trading partners.  The U.S. trade representative is working hard on GE's behalf." GE owns NBC.  Facts are tough, eh, Online Predator?  [FYI, The Progressive's Matthew Rothschild -- who has not engaged in Bash the Bitch -- has posted the efforts CBS' Early Show took, while on location, to avoid allowing people against the illegal war to be on camera in the background.]  So CBS Evening News went to Iraq and did any of the critics watch?  Apparently not.  Probably Piggy Pedophile tried to.  He probably pulled the lever down on his GE toaster and got confused when no picture came on. 
 
Yesterday, Katie Couric (CBS Evening News) interviewed Syrian president Bashar Assad who responded to the charges that the Syrian government was funding, training or whatever else the US military brass wants to offer as the current justification for the failure of the illegal war (it failed because it was illegal), "What do they do, those terrorists in Iraq?  They kill civilians, they create chaos.  What interest have Syria in having chaos in Iraq?  Chaos is contagious.  If we help the chaos in Iraq, this means we we work against our interest.  So we do our best to control our borders, first of all for Syrians; second, for the Iraqis; third, for the region."  This morning Amy Goodman (Democracy Now!) reported that "Israeli Air Force jets purportedly entered Syrian airspace" and Syria fired back.  So you might think some of the 'critics' would take a moment to check out yesterday's interview with the president of Syria.  However, you would be wrong.
 
Couric interviewed Assad and Iraq was the topic.  Assad explained that Syria pays "the price for the chaos in Iraq today,"  criticized the US administration for attempting to respond to political situations with military non-answers, and observed, "It's getting worse every day, nothing is better.  Sometimes it gets better, but it's like a flash in the pan; it just disappears, it's transient.  We're talking about the result, the chaos is worse, the killing is worse than before. . . ."  Assad also declared his belief that US troops should leave Iraq pointing out that "after four years . . .  every day is getting worse than before.  So I cannot say that American forces will bring stability to Iraq."
 
It's cute the way another round of Bash the Bitch allows alleged 'media critics' to ignore the fact that one of the biggest complaints about network news is the decrease in international coverage but a whole crowd ignored an interview on Iraq with the president of one of Iraq's neighboring countries.  Same way they didn't appear to notice the slack off in coverage from Iraq by Los Angeles Times and New York Times correspondents this week (most noticeable today).
 
Syria is where Riverbend is now.  The Iraqi blogger of Baghdad Burning recounts how she and her family waited and waited for the safest time to make their journey and she writes:
 
The tears had stopped about an hour after we'd left Baghdad. Just seeing the dirty streets, the ruins of buildings and houses, the smoke-filled horizon all helped me realize how fortunate I was to have a chance for something safer.

By the time we were out of Baghdad, my heart was no longer aching as it had been while we were still leaving it. The cars around us on the border were making me nervous. I hated being in the middle of so many possibly explosive vehicles. A part of me wanted to study the faces of the people around me, mostly families, and the other part of me, the one that's been trained to stay out of trouble the last four years, told me to keep my eyes to myself- it was almost over.

It was finally our turn. I sat stiffly in the car and waited as money passed hands; our passports were looked over and finally stamped. We were ushered along and the driver smiled with satisfaction, "It's been an easy trip, Alhamdulillah," he said cheerfully.

As we crossed the border and saw the last of the Iraqi flags, the tears began again. The car was silent except for the prattling of the driver who was telling us stories of escapades he had while crossing the border. I sneaked a look at my mother sitting beside me and her tears were flowing as well. There was simply nothing to say as we left Iraq. I wanted to sob, but I didn't want to seem like a baby. I didn't want the driver to think I was ungrateful for the chance to leave what had become a hellish place over the last four and a half years.
 
 
Riverbend and her family join over 4 million Iraqi refugees (internal and external) whom the illegal war has 'liberated'.  Relief Web released a new study today on the refugee crisis
noting that their numbers increase "[a]s the security situation continues to deteriorate inside Iraq, human displacement escalates to levels unparalleled in the region" and that it threatens the entire region.  The report notes: "The exodus of Iraq's professionals has led to severe brain drain, hitting the health, education, and government sectors particularly hard. This will have serious implications for Iraq's ability to rebuild the country when the violence decreases. Internal displacement is resulting in ethnic and sectarian homogenization of the country, and displaced communities are increasingly vulnerable to violence, kidnappings, and control by militias. Displacement is both a consequence and a cause of sectarian polarization in the country. Jordan and Syria now face internal security threats related to the immense economic burden of hosting the Iraqi populations, new sectarian demographics, tension among host and refugee populations as well as across sectarian divides, the potential of increased regime opposition, and the possibility that refugees will be recruited into armed militias if humanitarian assistance isn't sufficient to meet their needs."
 
 
 
Unrelated note, Michael Ratner (Center for Constitutional Rights, co-host of Law and Disorder) has a website entitled Just Left.  Community member Jonah noted that we plug things in the snapshot from time to time and asked if that could be worked in.
 
 

Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows.
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
Posted by at

Other Items

NOW with David Brancaccio begins airing on most PBS stations tonight:

Women in the U.S. military assaulted and raped by fellow soldiers - a shocking investigation. Next on NOW Roughly one in seven of America's active duty military soldiers is a woman, but a NOW investigation found that sexual assault and rape is widespread. One study of National Guard and Reserve forces found that almost one in four women had been assaulted or raped. Last year alone, almost 3,000 soldiers reported sexual assault and rape by other soldiers. On Friday, September 7 (check your local listings), in one of the only national television broadcasts of the issue, NOW features women who speak out for the first time about what happened. One woman recounts her ordeal of rape by her superior officer. Many more don't report the incidents for fear of how it will affect their careers. The shocking phenomenon has a label: military sexual trauma, or MST. NOW meets women courageously battling to overcome their MST, bringing light to an issue that's putting the army in shame. A NOW exclusive investigation.
The NOW website at www.pbs.org/now will offer the latest statistics on MST and insight into the challenges of reporting sexual abuse in the military
---------------------------------------------------
NEXT WEEK: A NOW HOUR-LONG SPECIAL, "Third Time Around" (NOW #337)
On the heels of a much-anticipated progress report in Washington, NOW travels to Iraq for an exclusive, hard look at the war through the eyes of the U.S. men and women fighting an elusive enemy that prefers roadside bombs to pitched battles. We first met the Third Infantry's First Brigade from Georgia's Ft. Stewart in January, only weeks before they headed back to Iraq for the third deployment in four years. They left behind newborn babies, young children, fiancées and wives. As the long months of the "surge" unfold, we see them fighting in the country's volatile Anbar province, while back at home their newborns become toddlers, and birthdays and anniversaries come and go.
"I think my biggest hope for this next year is just for it to go quickly and smoothly. I don't want anything major to happen to any of my guys or the rest of the squad or platoon," Soldier Michael Murphy tells NOW.
"My biggest concern is just to make it home with ten fingers and toes."
What are the personal and political costs of constant redeployment? Is the war effort at a turning point, or a breaking point?
"Do American soldiers think that this is a war worth fighting? Do they think this is a war we can win?" Andrew Krepenevich, a former army officer who now runs a Washington think tank told NOW.
"In a sense, you're battling not only for the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people, but the heart and mind of the American soldier."
"Third Time Around", an hour long NOW special, airs Friday, September 14. (Check local listings).
* A preview of the September 14 special: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGC9IrhOC90
* The original NOW episode where we first meet the soldiers: http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/303/
* A web-exclusive video extension featuring Ft. Stewart soldiers and their spouses: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gi9zazc0plA


Kara notes Marilou Johanek's "Bush's PR campaign in Iraq won't sway public opinion on war" (Toledo Blade):

THE publicity from Iraq was custom-ordered by the White House. It showed the commander in chief in shirt sleeves standing with troops cheering "hooah." President Bush was smiling broadly with an arm around a beaming soldier in a military base in the heart of the Anbar province.
The heavily fortified facility, about 120 miles west of Baghdad, is home to roughly 10,000 American troops. Mr. Bush was pictured bonding with some of those he sent to the sandbox from hell. The intent of his surprise visit was to impress the world with a personal appearance with soldiers in the war zone - which contrasts with a competing worldwide impression that he is their worst enemy.
But just days before Congress hears from Gen. David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker on how well the so-called troop "surge" is working, the Bush Administration is preoccupied with image-making. Anything - like surprise presidential visits - that deflects reality in Iraq is fair game.

No, the p.r. won't sway the people. But the people do not appear to be represented in Congress.
It's going to be really interesting to see Dems campaigning for election to Congress offering promises of what they will do when the public is very aware that they were given control of both houses in the November 2006 elections and that they chose to do nothing. Repeatedly.

The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.


Posted by at
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)