Leyla Qasim, a female Kurdish activist from Khanaqien, was executed by hanging by the former Iraqi Ba’athist regime for her political activism in the struggle for Kurdish freedom.
Along with her four male colleagues, Ms. Qasim, 22, was executed in one of Baghdad’s notorious prisons on May 12, 1974, after she had been arrested by the former regime’s security forces.
A student of sociology at the University of Baghdad, the political activist is highly regarded as one of the most courageous Kurdish female fighters and member of the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) Student Union of Kurdistan.
KDP President Massoud Barzani in his speech at the opening of the Barzani National Memorial explained that while she was in prison, she refused an offer of pardon by writing a letter to then Iraqi President, Ahmed Hassan al-Bakr.
Barzan recounted that she stated, “I would prefer execution over requesting a pardon from Ahmed Hassan al-Bakr. I would only ask for forgiveness from [General Mustafa] Barzani and my nation for not fulfilling my duties.”
Leyla Qasim was sixteen years old as Abdul Rahman Arif was overthrown by Ba'ath party leader, General Ahmed Hassan al-Bakr in 1968.[2]
Leyla was disturbed by the violent takeover in the capital. During the
late 1960s, Leyla and Çiyako wrote pamphlets on the horrors of the Ba'ath party including the new leader, Saddam Hussein, whom they described as being against Kurdish independence.
Leyla spoke to several Kurds in the Kurdistan Region about the Ba'ath regime and the loose morals of the members. Leyla was told that her words were inspiring sedition.
On 28 April 1974 she was detained together with four others and accused of attempting to hijack a plane.[3] She was arrested, tortured and, in Baghdad on 12 May 1974, ultimately hanged after a show trial, broadcast throughout Iraq.[4] She was accused of having planned to kill Saddam Hussein.[5] She was the first woman to be hanged by the Iraqi Ba'ath party.[6][7] Executed along with Qasim were also Jawad Hamawandi, Nariman Fuad Masti, Hassan Hama Rashid and Azad Sleman Miran.[8]
She was remembered on Twitter.
📌Leyla Qasim was remembered on the 49th anniversary of her execution on Friday. She was the first woman executed by the Iraqi state and is an icon of the Kurdish liberation struggle.#LeylaQasim | #jinjiyanazadihttps://t.co/ofPrwZxmko
22 years old #LeylaQasim, a Kurdish Fayli from Khanaqin, executed by Ba’athist regime in 12th May 1974 along with 4 other Kurdish men, Layla was a member of Kurdistan Students Union #KDP fighting for Kurdish rights. pic.twitter.com/lt94xOFnqY
Today marks the 49th anniversary of the execution of one of the Kurdish women symbols, #LeylaQasim, who was executed by the Ba'athist regime. Layla in the last words says: ‘Kill me, but you should know that through my death thousands of Kurds will awake from a deep sleep. pic.twitter.com/9NqVbx0Zhz
— Sarwan Wllatzheri (@SarwanBarzani_) May 12, 2023
Between 25 and 35 million
Kurds inhabit a mountainous region straddling the borders of Turkey,
Iraq, Syria, Iran and Armenia. They make up the fourth-largest ethnic
group in the Middle East, but they have never obtained a permanent
nation state.
[. . .]
In
the early 20th Century, many Kurds began to consider the creation of a
homeland - generally referred to as "Kurdistan". After World War One and
the defeat of the Ottoman Empire, the victorious Western allies made
provision for a Kurdish state in the 1920 Treaty of Sevres.
Such
hopes were dashed three years later, however, when the Treaty of
Lausanne, which set the boundaries of modern Turkey, made no provision
for a Kurdish state and left Kurds with minority status in their
respective countries. Over the next 80 years, any move by Kurds to set
up an independent state was brutally quashed.
Meanwhile in the reality-free world that hate merchants like Tulsi Gabbard attempt to create, history is ignored. Kimberly Kaye (LGBTQ NATION) notes "Mrs. Nash":
She was an esteemed laundress, baker, bruja, and midwife
with a penchant for wearing low necklines on her hand-stitched gowns. So
the shock hit harder than a 19th-century cannonball when, upon her
death, Fort Lincoln’s residents discovered “Mrs. Nash’ — valued friend
of famed Colonel George Custer and his wife and a thrice-married military bride herself — had been assigned male at birth.
So much for “we can always tell.”
“Mrs. Nash,” whose birth name has been lost to time, was a Mexican immigrant
first mentioned by historical records in the late 1880s. Reconstruction
was underway, the Plains Wars raging, and Nash had reportedly landed a
paying gig helping drive oxen across the Santa Fe Trail.
Friday, May 12, 2023. A 'think' tank tells us the US military can leave Iraq . . . in five years, there's a campaign to save the TV show THE WINCHESTERS, someone let Sabby Sabs know that typing a lie does not make the lie true, and much more.
You'd think Ava and I having written, 17 years ago, of SUPERNATURAL, that "it's like really bad gay porn where the leads forget to take their clothes off" would keep us off certain request lists. You'd think it.
THE CW is a piece of crap network today run on the cheap and desperate. They'll either commit to real programming or go down the toilet quickly -- real programming isn't Chip and Joanna or their ilk on a non HGTV channel. I have no idea why THE WINCHESTERS can't easily move to HBO (which needs new programming but is part of the problem due to new ownership) or PARAMOUNT+ which is still butt hurt over the survey that they sent to some subscribers earlier this week (results? If it's not STAR TREK and it's not Sarah Michelle Geller's WOLFPACK, subscribers aren't impressed) -- since it's a WB and CBS co-production. Jensen and company are attempting to save THE WINCHESTERS -- the SUPERNATURAL spin-off that THE CW announced was axed yesterday. I'm happy to note the campaign to save the show and we'll even open the snapshot with it.
It’s been 20 years since the start of the US-led invasion which toppled
the then president Saddam Hussein – launched under the false premise of
Iraq owning weapons of mass destruction. What followed were years of
violence, including a sectarian civil war, frequent terrorist attacks by
al-Qaida and, eventually, the emergence of Islamic State. About 300,000 civilians died in the conflict over the past 20 years and much of Iraq was left devastated.
Baghdad’s face is constantly changing: concrete blast walls coming down,
new co-working spaces popping up, the banks of the Tigris River being
redeveloped and a building boom under way. Young people have transformed
grey walls into colourful murals, or empty buildings into restaurants
and it is on this generation of people in their late teens and early 20s
that so many hopes are being pinned.
In the capital, Baghdad, they are students and
ballet instructors, artists and amputees who lost limbs during the heavy
years of conflict, entrepreneurs and business owners. Many were born
into war, and are now torn between two choices: “My generation either
wants to leave Iraq and start over elsewhere, or otherwise stay here and
invest, rebuild and move our country forward,” says Anwar Ahmed, a
23-year-old environmentalist. “Personally, I believe Baghdad needs me –
and even when it’s not always easy, I think I need it too.”
Of
course, she adds, metropolitan Baghdad with its 8 million residents
does not necessarily always speak for the rest of the country – but
“here’s where change starts”.
First, I missed the memo too -- the one on "300,000" -- that started showing up over and over this year. It's over a million dead and it was over a million before Bully Boy Bush left the White House.
Second, if they can leave Iraq, good for thm. The US military can't leave. All these years later, the US military can't leave.
The US government's Operation Inherent Resolve announced this morning:
Live Fire Exercises In Iraq For May
By CJTF-OIR Public Affairs
BAGHDAD, Iraq – On May 2, 2023, Coalition service members
will be conducting aerial operational exercises in or near the Erbil
region in Iraq to validate weapons systems and maintain crew proficiency
and readiness.
These exercises ensure the Coalition’s continued capability to
support our partner forces and protect our Coalition forces. Extensive
planning and proper safety measures are taken before and during live
fire rehearsals in order to protect the Coalition and the local
population.
Combined Joint Task Force – Operation Inherent Resolve advises,
assists, and enables partner forces to secure the lasting defeat of ISIS
and to enable the establishment of enduring security cooperation
frameworks.
UPDATE: On May 3, 2023, Coalition service members will be conducting
aerial operational exercises in or near the Erbil region in Iraq to
validate weapons systems and maintain crew proficiency and readiness.
UPDATE: On May 4, 2023, Coalition service members will be conducting
ground and aerial operational exercises in or near the Erbil and
Khalidiyah regions in Iraq to validate weapons systems and maintain crew
proficiency and readiness.
UPDATE: On May 5, 2023, Coalition service members will be conducting
aerial operational exercises in or near the Erbil region in Iraq to
validate weapons systems and maintain crew proficiency and readiness.
UPDATE: On May 6, 2023, Coalition service members will be conducting
aerial operational exercises in or near the Erbil region in Iraq to
validate weapons systems and maintain crew proficiency and readiness.
UPDATE: On May 7, 2023, Coalition service members will be conducting
ground operational exercises in or near the Mosul region in Iraq to
validate weapons systems and maintain crew proficiency and readiness.
UPDATE: On May 8, 2023, Coalition service members will be conducting
aerial operational exercises in or near the Mosul region in Iraq to
validate weapons systems and maintain crew proficiency and readiness.
UPDATE: On May 9, 2023, Coalition service members will be conducting
aerial operational exercises in or near the Mosul region in Iraq to
validate weapons systems and maintain crew proficiency and readiness.
UPDATE: On May 10, 2023, Coalition service members will be conducting
aerial operational exercises in or near the Sulaymaniyah region in Iraq
to validate weapons systems and maintain crew proficiency and
readiness.
UPDATE: On May 11, 2023, Coalition service members will be conducting
aerial operational exercises in or near the Erbil region in Iraq to
validate weapons systems and maintain crew proficiency and readiness.
UPDATE: On May 12, 2023, Coalition service members will be conducting
ground defense operational exercises in or near Baghdad, Iraq to
validate weapons systems and maintain crew proficiency and readiness.
They're not going anywhere. This wave of the war started in 2003 and it still hasn't ended. Over at the latest non-thinking think-tank (Quincy Institute For 'Responsible' Statecraft), Steven Simon and Adam Weinstein presented their best effort (which is really sad) regarding Iraq. It's entitled "How To Withdraw From Iraq in Five Years."
In five years.
The 'think'-tank is telling us how the US military can leave Iraq in . . . five years.
When Barack Obama became president, some thought US troops were coming home. "We want to end the Iraq War and we want to end it now!" he thundered on the 2008 campaign trail over and over. But didn't happen, did it. Let's
drop back to the February 8, 2012 snapshot:
We
covered the November 30th [2011] House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on
the MiddleEast and South Asia in the December 1st snapshot
and noted that Ranking Member Gary Ackerman had several questions. He
declared, "Number one, does the government of Iraq -- whose personnel
we intend to train -- support the [police training] program?
Interviews with senior Iaqi officials by the Special Inspector General
show utter didain for the program. When the Iraqis sugest that we take
our money and do things instead that are good for the United States. I
think that might be a clue." The State Dept's Brooke Darby faced that
Subcommittee. Ranking Member Gary Ackerman noted that the US had
already spent 8 years training the Iraq police force and wanted Darby
to answer as to whether it would take another 8 years before that
training was complete? Her reply was, "I'm not prepared to put a time
limit on it." She could and did talk up Deputy Minister of the
Ministry of Interior Adnan al-Asadi as a great friend to the US
government. But Ackerman and Subcommittee Chair Steve Chabot had
already noted Adnan al-Asadi, but not by name. That's the Iraqi
official, for example, Ackerman was referring to who made the
suggestion "that we take our money and do things instead that are good
for the United States." He made that remark to SIGIR Stuart Bowen.
Brooke
Darby noted that he didn't deny that comment or retract it; however,
she had spoken with him and he felt US trainers and training from the
US was needed. The big question was never asked in the hearing: If the
US government wants to know about this $500 million it is about to
spend covering the 2012 training of the Ministry of the Interior's
police, why are they talking to the Deputy Minister?
Ranking Member Gary Ackerman: When will they be willing to stand up without us?
Brooke Darby: I wish I could answer that question.
Ranking Member Gary Ackerman: Then why are we spending money if we don't have the answer?
[long pause]
Ranking
Member Gary Ackerman: You know, this is turning into what happens after
a bar mitzvah or a Jewish wedding. It's called "a Jewish goodbye."
Everybody keeps saying goodbye but nobody leaves.
That was 2011. It's eleven years later and Quincy wants to tell us how the US can leave . . . in five more years.
Ackerman: "It's called 'a Jewish goodbye.' Everybody keeps saying goodbye but nobody leaves."
True then, true all these years later.
The US media sold the war on Iraq with lies. All this time later, the media works overtime to either lie or be silent when it comes to the American Taliban. Ari Drennan (MEDIA MATTERS) calls out THE WASHINGTON POST for lying and selling hatred:
Reporting on a Washington Post/KFF poll that ran on the Post’s front page
on Monday morning promised “political jet fuel for Republicans in state
legislatures and Congress who are pushing measures restricting
curriculum, sports participation and medical care,” a self-fulfilling
prophecy enabled by the Post’s own oversimplified, hyperbolic framing.
The first question reported
in the story asked whether someone’s gender can differ from their sex
assigned at birth, a theoretical topic far removed from the actual GOP
policies concerning trans people, which have included bans on public
bathroom access, exclusions from athletic competition, and prohibitions
on gender-affirming care for adults.
Summarizing the poll, the authors wrote that “certainly for now, the
new Post-KFF poll finds, Republican lawmakers have the wind at their
backs on much of their anti-transgender legislative agenda.”
Indeed, in the only question concerning laws
discriminating against trans people, the Washington Post/KFF poll found
overwhelming majorities support protections for trans people in housing
(74%), employment (73%), and K-12 schools (69%). However, these were
not the conclusions that the Post chose to highlight in bizarrely
claiming that “most Americans support anti-trans policies favored by
GOP.”
The misleading framing of the Post’s story lent itself to coverage by Fox News, which used it to attack former college trans athlete Lia Thomas — who last competed 14 months ago and whose record in the 1,650-yard freestyle has since been broken by a cisgender swimmer — and to claim that Republicans are fighting for women’s sex-based rights instead of working to criminalize abortion. The poll was subsequently used by Fox News to defend a Texas bill that would criminalize gender-affirming care for minors and to argue that trans equality is being pushed by “marginal extremist individuals who are left-wing activists”
While the inclusion of trans people in public life has become a
matter of fierce debate in the last couple years, history shows the
danger of framing like that adopted by the Post. As pointed out by The American Independent writer Oliver Willis,
a 1961 Gallup poll found that what the Post would call “most Americans”
believed that the sit-in protests against racial segregation would
“hurt” the integration movement.
At a time when the position of much of the right
is that “transgenderism must be eradicated from public life entirely,”
The Washington Post’s poll analysis presenting attacks on trans people
as politically popular is, in fact, adding “jet fuel” to the fire being
stoked by the GOP.
THE WASHINGTON POST publishes their lies and FOX "NEWS" presents it on air as proof. We saw the same with Iraq. THE NEW YORK TIMES published the lies, then president of vice Dick Cheney went on NBC's MEET THE PRESS waving the 'report' by THE TIMES as proof.
There was a time, boys and girls, when John Stauber would have called such things out -- and did. But he's gone over to the dark side. As Rebecca's noted, "john stauber is the 21st century david horowitz."
The American Taliban is bent on destroying democracy and the nation itself. Some of the hate merchants are betting on Ron DeSantis -- alleged governor of Florida who fails at that task but thinks he should be president of the United States.
According to the Orlando Sentinel, DeSantis’
board has “created a code enforcement system that could issue fines to
Walt Disney World, which is known for meticulous care of its grounds,”
which would include imposing fines for code violations of up to $500 per
day, all determined by a group of newly-appointed code enforcement
officers, who would answer to the new administrator the board had
selected (along with a substantial pay increase). The new program “would
also authorize foreclosures on any liens.”
This increasingly bizarre mess started just over a year ago, with a milquetoast press release issued by the then-CEO Bob Chapek —
regarding the Parental Rights in Education bill (dubbed the “Don’t Say
Gay” bill by many of its critics) after it passed. Many other companies
criticized the legislation in far harsher terms before it passed, and
Disney didn’t actually do anything about the bill after that press release, but it was enough to trigger DeSantis’ ire.
Well,
more accurately, the Disney corporation presented an irresistible
target for DeSantis’ presidential ambitions, helping him secure some of
that sweet, sweet Fox News airtime as he sought to portray himself as a
warrior knight of the culture wars. As DeSantis admitted in his book, he
directed the GOP-controlled Florida legislature to rush through a bill
targeting Disney: an ill-conceived, unconstitutional effort to
repeal outright the Reedy Creek Improvement District (RCID), the
special taxing district for Disney’s property that stretches across
Orange and Osceola County.
DeSantis’ Cinderella Castle coup attempt was derailed by RCID’s outstanding municipal bond debt of over $1 billion that
would become the debt of the county taxpayers if RCID was dissolved — a
politically unpalatable development — so during the 2023 legislative
session, his minions in the legislature rushed forward another bill that kept
the main structure of RCID intact and took control of the board away
from Disney and granted that appointment power to the governor.
But before DeSantis’ new puppet board could seize the reins, Disney and the existing RCID board entered into a new development agreement (a
common legal instrument in Florida real estate development),
essentially freezing the existing system in place, prohibiting the
incoming board from using the Disney name or characters, and otherwise
sharply limiting their power — all done at a publicly-announced,
open-to-the-public RCID meeting that was recorded in the county public
records.
Disney
has filed suit in federal court, arguing that the plain language in an
incredibly long list of comments by DeSantis and his allies proves their
retaliatory intent, and therefore a violation of the First Amendment,
in addition to other claims based on contract law. First Amendment
jurisprudence has long held that the government cannot take otherwise
legal action (and the RCID repeal and board takeover violate other
provisions of Florida law) against a taxpayer as retaliation against the exercise of that taxpayer’s free speech rights.
B-b-b-but Jonathan Turley says!!!!
Jonathan
Turley doesn't know what he's talking about.
Sidebar, what
should a university do with a tenured professor if they find out that he
or she has actively participated in a cabal, an actual conspiracy -- as
legally defined? Pretend Ann Coulter could be a professor, for
example, and that back in the 90s when she was one of the 'elves'
working to overthrow then-President Bill Clinton, when that reality came
out, she could lose her job -- whether she had tenure or not. Tenure
makes you untouchable in a lot of ways but deceiving the public can
invalidate that.
At any
rate, Jonathan doesn't know what he's talking about. He's a mouthpiece
for the right-wing. It's gotten so bad that he no longer even does a
pretense that he's left. In addition to the legal issues, there's also
the harm Ronnie's doing to his own image. Dean Baker (TRIBUNE NEWS SERVICES) observes:
In
the good old days, we used to think that in a democracy, we should have
a level playing field. This meant that candidates made their case to
the voters and did their best to get supporters out to vote. Elections
were hard fought and often nasty, but the idea was that the person who
could get the most votes won.
Florida
Gov. Ron DeSantis doesn’t think this will work for him. He seems to
need the power of Florida’s government to help him advance his political
career.
That
is the story of his battle with Walt Disney Co. It is crucial to be
clear about the issue here. Florida arguably has been overly generous in
its subsidies to Disney, most notably ceding control over a chunk of
the state’s territory to Disney. People who live in the area near
Florida’s Disney World don’t vote for city or county officials; their
community is governed by Disney.
This
is an arrangement that dates back more than 50 years. Florida never
should have offered this sort of concession to attract Disney. Arguably,
it should be looking to take it back now.
But
that is not the issue here. DeSantis has made it clear that he is not
going after Disney because he thinks the state has been too generous
with the company. He is going after Disney because it publicly disagrees
with his politics.
DeSantis
is saying that he has the right to use the power of Florida’s
government to attack Disney for political reasons. And the issue is not
just Disney.
By
attacking Disney, one of the most influential companies in the country,
DeSantis is sending a warning. He is prepared to use the power of the
state’s government against any company or individual that might oppose
his political ambitions. Apparently, DeSantis is worried about his
prospects in fair elections. He feels he needs the power of the
government at his back to move ahead in politics.
And, of
course, among Republicans, he's harming himself. He's trying to pull
the MAGA vote away from Donald Trump but he's mainly just running off
what would be termed "reasonable Republicans" by some. They're not
really thrilled with his anti-business stance and stunts.
Jonathan can't tell you about that because it's not part of the on-message talking points delivered each morning.
Little
Ronnie and Swirley Turley are idiots who don't remember when Florida's
reputation found the state struggling to bring in tourists. I do. Lose
DISNEY and Florida will suffer. Florida has always been
tourism-dependent when it came to the economy. Getting DISNEY WORLD in
1971 was a major boost. It even helped them when Florida was seen as
too lawless, dangerous and with a heavy criminal element. In other
words, Ronnie, I'm not really sure that pissing off the people in charge
of creative entertainment is the way to go. You'll never win and all
you have to do is give the studios a reason to explore crime and Florida
and you'll see those tourist dollars taper off yet again. A gritty
reboot of MIAMI VICE, for example, could do a lot of harm to what would be left -- without DISNEY -- of the tourist industry.
Little Ronnie's an idiot. Jonathan Turley's just a media whore paid by FOX "NEWS."
when she came forward about Biden. You were silent. Why are you so concerned now?
Just typing something doesn't make it true. She grasps that, right?
Joshua Rhett Miller (NY POST) May 8, 2020 [Click on the link, Sabby, use the mouse -- okay, just stand up in the coffee house and ask someone to come over and help you with your laptop, Sabby]:
Rep.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez believes “something happened” between former
Vice President Joe Biden and a former staffer accusing him of sexual
assault some 27 years ago — although the allegations are not
“clear-cut,” she said.
Ocasio-Cortez, speaking to National Public Radio Thursday,
warned against rushing to judgment and urged due process regarding Tara
Reade’s claim that the Democratic presidential hopeful sexually
harassed her while working as an aide for Biden in 1993.
“There
have been investigative journalists that have corroborated certain
aspects of her account — that is undeniable — [and] have raised
questions about other aspects of her account,” Ocasio-Cortez said.
So, Sabby, are you a liar or just an idiot?
I
think you (a) are too stupid to remember recent history (or any) and
(b) that you're eager to attack AOC and you have a base of idiots who
believe you're little con game so you think you can type anything. It's
not that easy, Sabby. You were wrong. Don't correct it, that way
we'll know you lied intentionally.
Blogs and kisses -- as Tracey would say when doing her Arianna impersonation -- blogs and kisses.
And
that was spotted on Tara's feed -- Tara Reed reTweeted it. Another
reason never to support Tara. I've noted she made a credible case
and I've noted that even really awful and disgusting people -- who
leech off others and never repay them -- can be raped or assaulted. But
it's not my job to defend racists and transphobes so, as I've noted
before, Tara's on her own.
And
she should be.
AOC spoke out in her defense and Tara -- an ungrateful
attention whore -- rewards that by . . . reTweeting a dishonest attack.
Well if Tara couldn't be dishonest, she might never get to speak. Take a moment and ponder what a glorious world that would be.
As long as I'm fact checking, Jonathan Turley:
Today, I will testify on free speech protections before the Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Accountability. The hearing is entitled “Censorship Laundering: How the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Enables the Silencing of Dissent.”
No, you didn't. You testified at the House Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations and Accountability.
That's
the subcommittee that Marjorie Taylor Greene should be removed from for
applauding a leaker posting classified material online to show off --
yes, I know Majorie emphasized that he was a "White" "Christian" and
that apparently matters to her more than the rules in place for handling
classified information. That's why she needs to be removed from the
committee and any other one that might require her to handle classified
material.
