In the US, the presidential election will be held November 5, 2024. Early voting will start sooner but the 'last day' of voting will be November 5, 2024. The Democratic Party's presidential nominee is Kamala Harris. Yesterday, she and her running mate Tim Walz spoke to the United Auto Workers (UAW) in Wayne, Michigan Local 900 chapter. Local 900 members are credited with being part of the driving force last year that brought about the negotiations with the Big Three automakers last year. Addressing the gathered, Kamala noted, "When you know what you stand for, you know what to fight for. We stand
for the people. We stand for the dignity of work. We stand for justice.
We stand for equality. And we will fight for all of it." Excerpt:
You need speeches up there, you need issues and positions up there. The website deserves a D grade currently. I'm not here to sugar coat or tell people good job when there's no good job being done. This might fly with younger people but it's not working for the elderly population.
There's another problem and maybe I should have started with that. ACT BLUE should not be able to pull focus from Kamala's designated campaign site unless they clearly and easily link to her website. "I felt trapped," one 74 year old woman stated. She searched for Kamala Harris' website and saw ACT BLUE official Kamala Harris website. She clicked. And she couldn't go anywhere. Well maybe she could, maybe if she chose a donation amount and then gave her credit card information, maybe then she could go somewhere beyong that huge STOP SIGN that ACT BLUE's website is.
At least on Kamala's official site, they can click a clearly noted "Close" and get off the begging for money page to look for actual content.
These are people who vote and these are people who grew up as voters being able to dash to the local campaign headquarters where there would be tons of printed pages with positions on this and on that, with biographical information, you name it. This is hurting another group, by the way. But we'll come back to that.
There's no content there. Elderly people especially want content. If they're visiting a website for a presidential candidate, they should find a plethora of information -- more information than they could ever want.
The other group. As I was dictating the above, I flashed on 1992 and how Bill Clinton -- if people were being honest -- got about ten more votes because of campaign literature. It was a Sunday and it started with a mother of one of my kids' classmates calling about an assignment. Could I help? Some of the kids had put off their assignment on the presidential election. It was Sunday, the campaign office was closed, the internet wasn't what it is today. I said sure, let's meet at our local campaign headquarters and I'd unlock it and we'd get some papers for the woman's child that he could use to write a report. She said that was great and thanked me and asked if it was okay for any other parent to come along? Sure, anyone she knew whose kid needed material for a paper could meet us up there. It ended up being ten parents and they honestly weren't planning on voting. It's California, we go blue. They were busy raising kids and busy living life. But the fact that they were able to go in, on a Sunday, to a closed campaign office to get material so their kids could turn in an assignment the next day made a difference.
So I'm thinking of those 1992 parents. And school's about to start up. And they're going to be parents whose kid put off an assignment and they're going to be trying to help their children at the last minute and the official Kamala Harris for President website is useless at this point. They're not going to find anything that will talk about climate change or reproductive rights.
The only reason the website appears to exist right now is for donations. And that's the complaint I've heard all week from the elderly.
As things shifted in the last decades, Ava and I noted that a politician's campaign website was their campaign office and it needed to be run as such. (We also used to look at all the presidential campaign websites and write about how good or bad a job they were doing.) Team Kamala needs to up their game and do so immediately. Elderly voters are being let down. And as school starts to start up, if the website isn't beefed up, you're going to find parents feeling let down because they should be able to visit the official website and find information their kids can use for papers or presentations at school.
Let's move on. Robert Kennedy Junior. It's been such a busy week that we've only had time to post the videos about his creepy staging of a crime in Central Park with the corpse of a young bear cub. We don't have time for it now.
We're noting his contest. Donate ten dollars to Junior and you can enter to be part of the "celebrity cruise"!!!! Celebrity?
Cheryl's not a celebrity and she may be the most well known of that list of losers. Zac? The second Shazam movie flopped, his HAROLD movie that opened last weekend is a flop. Who does that leave? The ONLYFA NS 'actress'? What you really see, if you pay attention, is the COVID crazies. I really don't understand those crazies. One of them, for example, could use COVID to come out -- to finally come out. He could say, "I can't get an erection so I've decided I'll sleep with men." COVID is the key that will finally let you come out of the closet. Your management team wouldn't let you in the '00s. Now it can be your time at last. You can use COVID to come out as the bottom you've been your whole life and you can pin it on COVID by using that false rumor that the shot makes some men unable to get erections.
If you want to take a trip with losers, Junior's serving it up. Some might see winning that contest as a victory, I'd see it as being consigned to hell.
AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now!, democracynow.org, The War and Peace Report. I’m Amy Goodman.
Israel is facing growing condemnation over the torture and rape of
Palestinian prisoners. Israel’s Channel 12 News aired shocking footage
of Israeli soldiers sexually abusing a Palestinian prisoner. The video
shows a group of blindfolded prisoners lying on the ground inside a
prison at Sde Teiman army base, which critics have compared to
Guantánamo. Israeli guards are then seen taking one man into a corner,
where the soldiers encircled him and reportedly sexually assaulted him.
Israel’s investigation of this incident is what led a group of far-right
Israeli protesters and lawmakers to break into two military bases last
week in an effort to prevent the soldiers from being questioned.
Meanwhile, a group of U.N. experts has warned Israel’s escalating use
of torture of jailed Palestinians is a crime against humanity. The
experts wrote, “Torture practices are irredeemably unlawful and
constitute international crimes, yet form part of the modus operandi of
Israel’s notorious detention and torture system,” unquote.
Meanwhile, the Israeli human rights group B’Tselem has published a major new report documenting how the Israeli prison system has become what B’Tselem calls a “network of torture camps.”
I want to turn to an interview conducted by B’Tselem of Ashraf
al-Muhtaseb, a father of five from Hebron and a wedding band manager.
While detained on the morning of November 18th last year, Ashraf had
prison guards storm his cell he shared with other men, claiming they
were looking for a radio.
ASHRAF AL-MUHTASEB:
[translated] One morning at 6:00, they raided our cell, about 15 guards
with a monstrous dog. Sometimes they made him attack sensitive body
parts. They attacked us all, kicking us and hitting us with sticks. I
was leaning against the wall behind others in the cell. They started
kicking me in the neck and ear. Unfortunately, I got a very hard blow to
my ear. I’ve completely lost my hearing on that side. I got four
fractures in my back ribs, three in my chest, and fractures in my hands
and other body parts.
AMY GOODMAN:
In another interview conducted by the Israeli human rights group
B’Tselem, 50-year-old Firas Hassan, an official in the Palestinian
Authority’s Ministry of Youth and Sports, describes not only being
beaten by prison guards while in detention, but hearing that their
brutal attack is being live-streamed for Itamar Ben-Gvir, the minister
of national security of Israel, to watch.
FIRAS HASSAN:
[translated] On November 9th, 2023, two prison forces, the District
Unit and the Initial Response Force, came into cell 14 we were in, on
wing 28. We were 10 Palestinians in the cell. The forces came in masked
and beat us for 50 minutes. They laughed while they hit us and
live-streamed it all. I understand Hebrew, and I heard one say, “We’re
live-streaming for Ben-Gvir, directly to Ben-Gvir.” They beat us in
various ways, with their hands and feet, and then brought in police
dogs, after they tied our hands behind our backs and blindfolded us.
AMY GOODMAN:
B’Tselem also spoke to Sari Huriyyah. He’s a 53-year-old real estate
lawyer and an Israeli citizen. He was arrested and detained over a
Facebook post November 4th last year. In this clip, Sari describes 'Abd
a-Rahman Mar'i, a 23-year-old man in the isolation cell next to him,
screaming in pain and later being brought out in a body bag.
SARI HURIYYAH:
[translated] He screamed in pain constantly, begging for the doctor.
The guard would come now and then and swear at him and tell him to shut
up. In the morning, the guards came to count us. One said, “Get up, you
animal. Get up, you dog.” They checked him, and the whole place went
silent. Finally, the doctor said, “There’s nothing to be done.” One of
the guards said to them, “My condolences.” And they all started
laughing. They put him in a black body bag and carried him out like
trash.
AMY GOODMAN:
We’re joined right now by Sarit Michaeli, international advocacy lead
for the Israeli human rights group B’Tselem. The group’s new report is titled “Welcome to Hell: The Israeli Prison System as a Network of Torture Camps.”
Sarit, thanks so much for being with us. Just as we listen to these horrifying accounts, please lay out your findings.
SARIT MICHAELI:
I think on a very fundamental level, Amy, our findings look at the
systemic, ongoing and state-sanctioned, government-sanctioned use of
torture and abuse in the Israeli prison system vis-à-vis Palestinians,
Palestinians who Israel considers to be — views as security prisoners.
Now, this is something that we have discussed in the past. I mean,
torture and abuse of Palestinian detainees in detention and
interrogations have occurred. They have been documented. But the level,
the degree, the scope, the scale of this phenomenon since October 7th
are simply unrelated to anything we’ve seen in the past.
And when we look at the way these people are treated — you showed
some of the testimonies. Some of the — many more testimonies are
actually available on our website,
and we are sharing them online. You see that, clearly, this isn’t the
actions of any sort of rogue element of the Israeli prison system. It’s a
government-sanctioned and also government-supported,
government-mandated policy. And that’s the central conclusion that we
have from all of the information that we’ve collected in recent months.
AMY GOODMAN:
If you can talk about Firas, who was describing not only being beaten
by the Israeli soldiers, but also the fact that this beating was being
live-streamed for the national security minister of Israel, Itamar
Ben-Gvir, to watch?
SARIT MICHAELI:
So, I just want to clarify: We know that the police say — or, sorry,
the prison guards were discussing this. Certainly, we have not — you
know, we clarified in our communications that we don’t know whether this
was indeed, like, literally live-streamed for Itamar Ben-Gvir or
whether it was more about the spirit of Itamar Ben-Gvir, because a lot
of the things we see on the ground today in the Israeli prison system
are directly related to the influence, to the spirit of Minister
Ben-Gvir.
I think it’s certainly not the case that Minister Ben-Gvir is the
only person responsible. Absolutely, the prime minister, Prime Minister
Netanyahu, who gave him all of his authority, is absolutely responsible
and culpable for this reality. But the Israeli government and Ben-Gvir
have shown again and again, since October 7th but also before October
7th, that they are hell-bent, that their intention is to cause this
deterioration to increase the pressure on Palestinian prisoners.
And this was — this has been done, and we saw these kinds of
developments even prior to October 7th. From the beginning of the tenure
of Minister Ben-Gvir as minister of national security, he has been
imposing his racist, his Kahanist agenda, both on the Israeli police,
with great success, unfortunately, and also on the Israeli Prison
Service. October 7th, the horror, the crimes committed against Israelis
on October 7th, served as a golden opportunity for Ben-Gvir to continue
to cynically manipulate the Israeli trauma, the Israeli fear and anger,
in order to push forward this agenda that he has been promoting even
beforehand.
So, I think one of the clear things that we’ve seen on the ground and
in the system since October 7th was that much of this Israeli policy,
at least the parts about starving prisoners, about cramping them all
together in large numbers in cells, canceling any possibility for them
to have any sort of sustenance, to buy additional food, for example, all
of these policies have been declared. They’ve been stated by the
Israeli government. They haven’t hid this. Ben-Gvir himself has been on
the media promoting these policies and showing — you know, having these,
like, show visits to visit prisoners that he claims are Nukhba — right?
— are Palestinian, are Hamas fighters from Gaza.
But what we have seen again and again, based on the testimonies that
we’ve taken, is that the Israeli policy wasn’t just applied Palestinian
Hamas suspects. We would argue, by the way, that this is absolutely,
categorically prohibited regardless of the crimes people have been
— have committed. Torture and this type of treatment is absolutely
prohibited. But Israel is claiming, and in some cases showing — right? —
performing, in a way. And this is — I think the incident that was
described in this testimony seems very much an example of this, not just
the kind of actual violence and ill-treatment and humiliation, but
making it very, very public. And this is something that is simply
chilling and is part of the really deep moral abyss that this report
exposes, I think, within our society today.
AMY GOODMAN:
The Israeli Supreme Court considered a petition yesterday to close a
desert military prison where soldiers have been accused of abusing
Palestinians, most recently this shocking video that aired on Israeli
News 12, the Channel 12, showing Israeli soldiers sexually abusing a
Palestinian prisoner. Talk about that video and what the Supreme Court
is calling for or if they’ve had a ruling yet.
SARIT MICHAELI:
Well, I think there’s a few things to unpack in this situation. I mean,
again, regardless of the specifics of this individual case — B’Tselem
hasn’t documented it; we’re not familiar enough with the details — I
think this is a moment within Israeli society where the old way of doing
things, which involved very often these sham investigations — right?
— pretending that we’re holding soldiers accountable for violations of
Palestinian rights and investigating suspected wrongdoing, this is
rejected, is being rejected by a growing — maybe majority, certainly
very large number of Israelis, who are simply not interested in any kind
of accountability, because they do not believe that the Palestinians
deserve any rights. And this is an interesting and quite disturbing and
very, very depressing situation to experience, because the power and the
violence released by the recent, for example, charging of far-right
activists into the Sde Teiman military base and into the Beit Lid
military base isn’t just going to harm, you know, the specific
investigative bodies that we are very critical of. This is an action
that is very concerted and coordinated by the Israeli far right in order
to scare off any type of law enforcement in Israeli society.
And this is why I think it’s so deeply connected to what we’ve seen
yesterday in the High Court. There is a High Court petition against Sde
Teiman. It’s being — it was presented by the Israeli — by the
Association for Civil Rights in Israel. And the state has, as is its
custom, denied that there is any wrongdoing in Sde Teiman. But there’s
also another kind of parallel development, which is that a far-right mob
has actually verbally charged the High Court justices yesterday in the
Israeli High Court and also tried to assault the lawyers acting on
behalf of ACRI. And I think this is an
excellent example of what has been happening to the gatekeepers in
Israel. This is an example of why these gatekeepers, who were meant to
protect against the type of abuses that we describe in this report, they
have been so scared off, they’ve been so weakened and paralyzed after
many, many years of these types of far-right and even quite centrist
assaults, that the type of reality that we exposed in the report is
allowed to go pretty much on as Minister Ben-Gvir pleases, with very
little resistance from the High Court, the other courts, from the
attorney general. Now, certainly, we have had, and we’re still extremely
critical of these institutions, of the Israeli court system, of the
Israeli attorney general, but we do expect them to stand up to this type
of abuse, to this type of official torture. And I think one of the
reasons why Ben-Gvir has been so successful in imposing his own agenda,
his racist, Kahanist agenda, is this weakness, the cowering of the
gatekeepers that have been weakened for so many years.
AMY GOODMAN:
And can you talk about the protests that took place in the last days
trying to prevent the Israeli soldiers or police from being questioned
about the sexual assault or the rape of a Palestinian prisoner?
SARIT MICHAELI:
Yeah. I mean, I think I should also maybe open this with one point of
light in the current reality, which is that since the publication of
B’Tselem’s report, and also since the publication and the exposure of
the story about these really horrific suspicions in Sde Teiman, there’s
been a very strong voice coming from Israelis who categorically oppose
this — not necessarily Israelis who are absolutely with B’Tselem on
everything, mainstream Israelis who know, who understand that if you are
a country that claims you’re a democracy — of course, we would take
great issue with this — then you cannot simply abuse people because you
suspect them or because you’ve accused them and even because you’ve
convicted them of perpetrating the most horrific crimes. This is simply
unacceptable. And people are saying this very openly in our society
today. These might not be the majority of Israelis, but it’s very
heartening to hear these voices again and again, as I said, also in
response to B’Tselem’s report.
But the story itself, the reason it got such prominence is because it
really is — it’s something that one did not expect to see up until,
really, the recent period. And I’m saying that even though, you know, as
I said, B’Tselem’s report also revealed additional cases of suspected
sexual and gender-based abuse. The story of the suspicions of sexual
abuse by soldiers in Sde Teiman has generated a mass public outcry, but
it’s also generated a mass response by proponents of the far right, of
the Kahanist movement in Israel, who simply do not want any kind of
action by Israeli soldiers against Palestinians to be subject of any
sort of accountability process. I mean, that’s the whole point. From
their perspective, they would like to have a completely open field in
terms of what they can do to Palestinians. And this is both for soldiers
and settlers. And anyone who tries to impose any, even the most
rudimentary, the most basic, level of accountability is attacked as an
enemy of the state, as a traitor.
And this brings us into quite an absurd situation, where bodies that
we, as I said, are extremely critical of — for example, the State
Attorney’s Office and also the Military Advocate General’s Office — are
now coming under fire, not for what we would argue is the correct
reason, the fact that they have enabled Israel to allow the army and
soldiers on the ground to use totally disproportionate force against
Palestinians. They’ve enabled almost everything that Israel has been
doing in Gaza in recent months — the mass killings, the starvation, the
horrific things we have done in Gaza. This is not what the far right is
criticizing these institutions for. The criticism is coming when — in
the very, very rare cases where there is an occasional investigation
when the Israeli investigative bodies simply don’t have any other
choice, I’m assuming. I’m only speculating, right? But the fact that
there is CCTV footage of this alleged assault
and the fact that the story has become so prominent and the possibility
of an internal whistleblower inside who reported this have left the
authorities really with no option other than to conduct this
investigation. Certainly, many other cases and the broad policy is not
investigated, but they are still attacked by the right for this tiny
foray into accountability.
AMY GOODMAN:
I want to go to yesterday’s briefing at the U.S. State Department,
where Matthew Miller is questioned about this issue. This is the
reporter Rabia Iclal Turan.
RABIA ICLAL TURAN:
Going back to Israel, Israeli media today released a video showing
Israeli soldiers raping a Palestinian detainee at Sde Teiman detention
camp. The footage was very disturbing. I know you have commented on the
reports about this detention center before, but we have now — we now
have a new evidence, which is video. Have you seen that video? And do
you have anything to say on that and also the reports of, you know, rape
—
MATTHEW MILLER: Yeah.
RABIA ICLAL TURAN: — in Israeli prisons?
MATTHEW MILLER:
So, we have seen the video. And reports of sexual abuse of detainees
are horrific. They ought to be investigated fully by the government of
Israel, by the IDF. Prisoners need to be
treated — prisoners’ human rights need to be respected in all cases. And
when there are alleged violations, the government of Israel needs to
take steps to investigate those who are alleged to have committed abuses
and, if appropriate, hold them accountable.
RABIA ICLAL TURAN:
And, actually, this is not the first rape incident we have been hearing
about Israeli prisons. And Israeli human rights group B’Tselem on
Monday released a report saying that Sde Teiman is only tip of the
iceberg and that, you know, Israeli detention centers turned into a
network of torture camps for Palestinian — Palestinians. Its report
cited testimonies from 55 Palestinian detainees. So, I know the Israelis
are investigating this, but would you support an independent
investigation into those allegations?
MATTHEW MILLER:
So, I would have to look at what the specific independent investigation
people are calling for and pass judgment on the merits. But, look,
there ought to be zero tolerance for sexual abuse, rape of any detainee,
period.
AMY GOODMAN:
So, that’s the State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller. Sarit
Michaeli, if you could talk about the significance of what he is saying,
and what you’re demanding at this point as the international advocacy
lead for the Israeli human rights group B’Tselem?
SARIT MICHAELI:
Yes, Amy. Well, I think the most important thing to clarify in terms of
our response to this is that Israel is not going to hold an
investigation into the conduct and into the policies in its detention
centers, for the pure reason, for the obvious reasons that these are
policies. They’re not the actions of rogue elements, as I said. They’re
not the actions of individuals who are going against the grain. They are
dictated by the management of the Israeli prison system and by the
government. They are supported by these bodies. And therefore, the only
options for investigations are individual cases that are either so
egregious that it would be impossible for the authorities to ignore them
because of international pressure or in cases where there is some sort
of documentation. And that is generally, I think — when you look at the
Israeli investigations, that is generally the way the Israeli
authorities work. The small, isolated, token investigations cover up for
broader policies.
And in this specific case, I think, from our perspective, we have, A,
not appealed — we have not requested Israeli investigations; B, we do
not expect any Israeli investigations to fundamentally alter the
situation. What we do expect is the international community to take
action. And in the report, we’ve appealed to all nations and also to all
relevant international institutions to look into the situation, to make
it — to make it stop. Specifically, we’ve also appealed to the
International Criminal Court, because these offenses that we list in our
report are war crimes. They also, we would argue, reach the magnitude
of crimes against humanity. And this is the responsibility of the
international community, including the United States government, to
address. It’s not just an intra-Israeli issue. Certainly, the Israeli
government in its current standing — I mean, it’s pretty blatantly
obvious that if the Israeli government is not able to hold an
investigation into such serious allegations of horrific abuse without a
mob of right-wing fanatics rushing, storming into two military bases,
then it’s blatant that Israel isn’t going to be able — willing or able
to address this broader policy of torture, you know, by order,
essentially, against Palestinians since October 7th.
AMY GOODMAN:
Sarit Michaeli, I want to thank you for being with us from Tel Aviv,
international advocacy lead for the Israeli human rights group B’Tselem.
We’ll link to your new report —
SARIT MICHAELI: Thank you very much.
AMY GOODMAN: — “Welcome to Hell: The Israeli Prison System as a Network of Torture Camps.”
Where's the video? Use the link. We posted it yesterday afternoon. A few hours later, YOUTUBE had done their censorship nonsense. I'm not posting a video in a snapshot that is a blank square before the snapshot goes up.
Well I'm blown away because in response to the above a Vance supporter e-mailed to insist his outrage. I'm amazed. Who knew Vance had a supporter. But the man didn't make a convincing case for an informed supporter, "J.D. Vance saw combat in Iraq and defused bombs. He was not a journalist in Iraq and he would never be part of a profession like that!"
For more on military service, you can refer to this video.