Thursday, August 24, 2006

Other Items

Of all the words that President Bush used at his news conference this week to defend his policies in Iraq, the one that did not pass his lips was "progress."
For three years, the president tried to reassure Americans that more progress was being made in Iraq than they realized. But with Iraq either in civil war or on the brink of it, Bush dropped the unseen-progress argument in favor of the contention that things could be even worse.

The above is not from the New York Times. It's certainly not from a piece by rooting-tooting Jim Rutenberg. Tom notes it. It's from Peter Baker's "Bush's New Iraq Argument: It Could Be Worse" (Washington Post).

It could be worse. That's what we shoot for now. And, if you think about it, that's just another side to the fear card. Fear was played up to lead a nation into an illegal war and fear's going to be used to attempt to keep the war going. Even though the Times tries to turn their most recent poll into an election guide, the reality (which they tenderly side-step) is that the nation's turned against the war. It's going to take more than fear and cheerleading to change the tide of public opinion.

But, as the next highlight points out, some are already hard at work, attempting to do just that.
Keesha notes Ron Jacobs' "The Liberal Warmongers are at It Again" (CounterPunch):

The liberal warmongers are at it again. In Sunday's (August 20, 2006) Washington Post, Neal Pollack and Daniel Byman of the Brookings Institution and Georgetown's Center for Peace and Security Studies offer an analysis and prescription for an Iraq that they believe is already in a state of civil war. Ignoring the fundamental reason that this situation exists--the US occupation of the country--these two men tell the reader that the growing sectarian violence in Iraq will be even more dangerous should it spill over Iraq's borders. Furthermore, they argue, the latter will eventually occur. This fact alone means that US responsibilities in the region will increase, not lessen.
Prior to this prognostication, the two men write that it would take close to a half-million soldiers to "quash an all-out civil war there." There is no other alternative offered by these imperial apologists, and this statement is qualified by stating that this is more than the US has already committed. It's not that Pollack and Byman actually call for US troops to be mobilized for these increasing "responsibilities." It's that they write as if there were no alternatives, since in their minds the so-called responsibilities are not ones that Washington chooses to undertake because it sees its empire as being essential to the peace of the world. Unsaid in this do-gooder approach is that the only peace Washington and its apologists (neocon to neoliberal and beyond) want is one that benefits Washington and its corporate masters. If that peace takes a world war, then by god, that's what will have to happen, but only because its for the world's good.
Meanwhile, from another corner of the imperial ring, on that same Sunday John McCain called for many more US troops in Iraq. During a conversation on "Meet the Press," Mr. McCain said that the US must win in Iraq. Otherwise, he added, there would be chaos in the region. If I had been sitting in the interviewer's chair in the NBC studio that morning, I would have had to ask Mr. McCain what word he might use to define the current situation in Iraq. Democracy? Peaceful transition? Order? From where I sit, the current situation in Iraq is the definition of chaos. The addition of more US troops would only create more, especially since Mr. McCain wants them to go after not only the Sunni and secular insurgency; he also wants them to go after the Shia militias. Now that's a recipe for calm.


The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.




Posted by at

NYT: Plays 'who matters?' (the same game J. M. Laughner played)

So the New York Times (and CBS) did a poll to test the mood of the country, Carl Hulse and Marjorie Connelly wrote it, someone titled it "Poll Shows a Shift in Opinion on Iraq War" and the thing that still stands out is that of the follow up interviews the Times decides to note (the only individuals who are quoted in this story) you've got two Republicans and one independent. Be careful when you set your coffee cup down, the table is obviously tilted.

(This is the same poll we noted in yesterday's snapshot.)

Otherwise? The Times still 'reports' on Saddam's trial, if you can call it that. How did he get the chemical weapons he used? Who supported him? The date "1987" should probably be in the headline. Oh well, maybe in two decades China or another nation can lead a crimes against humanity inquiry into what was done at Waco or in Philadephia to MOVE? For now, we're all supposed to pretend like these trials are about things that were unknown until a few years ago and done by lone gunman Saddam with no knowledge (and certainly no support) from the world community. But if weren't for the Times lousy trial coverage, we wouldn't even have an Iraq article today (the drums are beating for war with Iran at the paper, in case anyone missed it) so, from Damien Cave's jury duty report today, we'll note the following:

In Baquba on Wednesday, eight people were killed, including the owner of an ice cream shop, in clashes that broke out in several areas of the city, the authorities said. A roadside bomb in Falluja, the site of several large battles between American troops and insurgents, killed two Iraqi civilians, wounded four and damaged an American tank, according to the police.
In Baghdad, at least 15 people were found dead, many showing signs of torture, according to Interior Ministry and hospital officials.
An American serviceman died from his injuries after combat in Mosul, the United States military said in a statement. The Iraqi Army said it had killed one militant and arrested 29 others throughout the country since Tuesday.
Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki also offered his most specific plans to date for the transfer of authority to Iraqi forces. Though additional American troops were required recently to secure the capital, he said Iraqi forces were on track to handle security within a matter of months.

Martha notes Josh White's "Marine Called Haditha Shootings Appropriate" (Washington Post) and it's about how the military had J.M. Laughner do an investigation into the November 19, 2005 slaughter early on and he didn't see anything of concern. That attitude comes through the loudest at the end of the article:

"It made sense, that they had ran out of the car and then they engaged," Laughner said. When asked if anyone ever hinted that the situation that day was considered inappropriate or if something bad had happened, Laughner answered: "No, just that a Marine died. That is the only bad thing."

Some lives have value and some don't. Laughner sees two dozen corpses and is asked if anything "bad" happened. He responds: "No, just that a Marine died."

Mia notes (and it fits in here) Francis A. Boyle's "Statement on Behalf of Lt. Ehren Watada" (CounterPunch):

Today the peoples of the world are likewise asking themselves: Where are the "good" Americans? Well, there are some good Americans. They are getting prosecuted for protesting against illegal U.S. military interventions and war crimes around the world. First Lieutenant Ehren Watada is America's equivalent to Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Vaclav Havel, Andrei Sakharov, Wei Jingsheng, Aung San Suu Kyi, and others. He is the archetypal American Hero whom we should be bringing into our schools and teaching our children to emulate, not those wholesale purveyors of gratuitous violence and bloodshed adulated by the U.S. government, America's power elite, the mainstream corporate news media, and its interlocked entertainment industry.
In international legal terms, the Bush Jr. administration itself should now be viewed as constituting an ongoing criminal conspiracy under international criminal law in violation of the Nuremberg Charter, the Nuremberg Judgment, and the Nuremberg Principles, because of its formulation and undertaking of wars of aggression, crimes against peace, crimes against humanity, and war crimes that are legally akin to those perpetrated by the former Nazi regime in Germany.

The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.









Posted by at

Wednesday, August 23, 2006

Iraq snapshot

Wednesday, August 23, 2006 chaos and violence continue in Iraq, Ehren Watada's father Bob continues traveling and speaking to raise awareness about his son's case, a new poll by the New York Times continues to demonstrate the trend of Americans turning against the war and another witness in the military inquiry into the death of Jake Kovco blasts the way the investigation was conducted.
 
Today Bob Watada spoke with Philip Maldari on  KPFA's The Morning Show about his son Ehren Watada, the first known officer to publicly refuse to deploy to Iraq.  Bob Watada spoke of the potential consequences that his son could face but noted that Ehren was aware of the consenquences, that there's " a real crisis in this country," and that even "knowing that he may got to jail" his son knew he had to take the stand he did an refuse to deploy.  Bob Watada spoke of how his son's discovery of the lies that led a nation into an illegal war changed everything: "When he found out what was going on in Iraq, the president lying to the people, lying to Congress, lying to the military," he knew that he couldn't go to Iraq both for himself and for those who'd be serving under him.
 
Bob Watada spoke of the expectation that the US military will use Ehren Watada as an example in an effort clamp down on the dissent within the military. And, in answer to Maldari's question of what can be done, he spoke of the importance of public opinion in his son's case: "If the military sees that there is a large swell of public opinion on behalf of Lt. Ehren Watada, they're going to think twice about what they're doing."
 
The importance of public support/action was also demonstrated in the calls.  One that stands out is caller Alden, WWII veteran, in The Underwater Demolition, spoke of being stationed in Hawaii and  "about March of '46 the word came through that all the G.I.s were going to be sent back into China to start a war against the new Chinese government.  Following this, a couple of days later, there was about 10,000 GIs in Honolulu protesting,  saying 'We are going home' and about three days later another one, ten-to-twelve thousand G.I.s saying 'We are going home' and that stopped it.  And that was what was going on back in those days and I'm just so supportive and feel completely what Watada is doing and the way he put it and the father and the way he puts it -- that is just outstanding."
 
 
 
Bob Watada is attempting to raise awareness of his son's case and upcoming events include:
 
Wed. 8/23
7-9:30pm Reception & Educational Event
St. Paul's Church, 405 S. 10th St,
San Jose
Contact: Rose Takamoto 408-725-2933

Thu. 8/24
noon-3pm World Can't Wait­Youth & Students Conference
San Francisco (site TBA)
Contact: Jessalyn Gagui 415-286-3408

7pm Reception & Educational Event
Newman Center, 5900 Newman Ct.,
Sacramento
Contact: Sacramento-Yolo Peace Action 916-448-7157
 
Fri. 8/25
10-11:30am
No. Cal. Japanese
Christian Theological Forum
Berkeley Methodist United Church-
chapel
1710 Carleton St/McGee in Berkeley
Contact: Laura Takeuchi 510-848-3614

7-10pm
Film Screening & Speakers
Santa Cruz Veterans Building
Contact: Sharon Kufeldt 650-799-1070

Sat. 8/26 7-9pm
Educational & Cultural Event
Berkeley Friends
Church; 1600 Sacramento St.,
Berkeley
Contact: Betty Kano 510-684-0239

Sun. 8/27 4-6pm Speaking Event
AFSC building, 65-Ninth St., SF
Contact: Martha Hubert 415-647-1119
 
 
A complete list of the events Bob Watada will be taking part in can be found here.
 
We will again note: : Cedric (Cedric's Big Mix) is advising those calling Donald Rumsfeld (703-545-6700) or mailing him (1000 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1000) to say: "Hands off Ehren Watada! Let him go." Billie advises that you can use public@defenselink.mil to e-mail the Pentagon. She suggests "Re: Ehren Watad" or "ATTN: DONALD RUMSFELD." Courage to Resist and ThankYouLt.org. will continue to offer resources, ideas and inspiration. Get the word out.
 
Of the various stops he's made so far to speak of his son, Bob Watada said, "It's been really postive here in the Bay Area.  Just about everywhere we've gone, we've had packed crowds. . .  The other day I had somebody who came up before the program started and said he was a veteran and he didn't really think he could support me or my son. . .  . At the end of the evening he came up to me and said 'Whatever you need, whatever your son needs, I want to help you out.'"
 
 
In other peace news, Cindy Sheehan will rejoin Camp Casey III after "several days" reports the Associated Press.  Sheehan is back in the Providence Health Center in Waco "recovering . . . after having a hysterctomy" on Tuesday. Next week, Sheehan is scheduled to be in Salt Lake City participating with the city's mayor Rocky Anderson and others in protesting Bully Boy's August 31st speech (during a trip on which Condi Rice is accompanying him).
 
That's how Sheehan plans to end the month, at the beginning of the month she went to Jordan with Ann Wright, Tom Hayden, Medea Benjamin, Geal Murphy, Jodie Evans, Diane Wilson and others to meet with Iraqi legislators.  Eric Horsting (Washington Beachcomber) reports that also on the trip was filmmaker David Rothmiller who shot footage "to create campaign material for Jeeni Criscenzo, a Democratic candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives from the 49th district in California."
 
As the November elections approach, many get edgy and itchy.  A new poll by the New York Times and CBS News continues to note the shift in public opinion of the illegal war.  Summarizing the poll, Carl Hulse and Marjorie Connelly (New York Times) note of those surveyed: 51 percent "saw no link between the war in Iraq and the broader antiterror effort"; 53% said the "war was a mistake"; 62% agreed that things in Iraq could be rated "somewhat or very badly"; 46 percent felt the Bully Boy "had concentrated too much on Iraq".  Hulse and Connelly's article also features comments from three follow up interviews.  Those views worthy of being noted?  Two Republicans and a self-described independent.
 
In Iraq, the violence and the chaos, to no one's surprise, continues.
 
Bombings?
 
In the Baghdad, city of so-called crackdowns, a roadside bomb (possibly targeting Jawad  al-Bolani, the Interior Minister) claimed the lives of two civilians and left others wounded according to the Associated Press.  AFP notes that a roadside bomb killed two civilians "between Basra and Nasiriyah."  KUNA reports that "[a] car exploded . . . near an army special ops check-point in Dorra" and "that the explosion resulted in several deaths and injuries among the special ops troops in the area."   In Mosul, the AP reports, one woman was killed and ten people were wounded by a suicide bomber while, in Falljua, a roadside bomb claimed two lives and left twelve wounded.
 
Shootings? 
 
The AP reports that "1st Lt. Hassanein Saadi al-Zerjawi . . . was gunned down in a drive-by shooting in Amarah".  Reuters notes that eight people were shot dead in Baquba and a police officer shot dead in al-Hay. AFP notes that, in Kut, "two civilians were shot dead" with a child and one other adult wounded.
 
Corpses?
 
AFP reports that six corpses were found beneath a bridge "between the two volatile cities of Mahmudiyah and Latifyah" and three were discovered in Baquba.
 
In Australia, the military inquiry into the April 21st death in Baghdad of Jake Kovco continues.  The most recent developments revolve around Soldier 47's testimony.  Australia's ABC reports that Soldier 47, "[a] military police investigator" went to Baghdad from Melbourne to investigate the death of Jake Kovco  and that "he was informed on the day of Pte Kovco's death to deploy immediately to Baghdad." AAP notes that during Soldier 47 three hour, video-link testimony (from Baghdad), he "detailed a litany of miscommunication and army bungles surrounding the death of the Victorian soldier who was shot in his Baghdad barracks room on April 21."  The Daily Telegraph reports of the testiomony that "he was also angerd and surprised that Pte Kovco's body had been flown from Baghdad to Kuwait agains the orgers of the military police's special investigations branch" and "frustrated that forensic evidence was lost when the body had been washed and treated while Pte Kovco's clothes had been destroyed." ABC New South Wales notes that Soldier 47 voiced his frustration over being "told he could not view notes made by Private Kovco's room-mates" and finding out that "the room-mates were in Kuwait, not Baghdad, so he could not immediately interview them."  Tracy Ong (The Australian) reports that Soldier 47 gave up custody of Jake Kovco's body because a) he wanted to "get to the scene of the shooting" and because "certain integrites had already been compromised" (see "forensic evidence was lost" two sentences prior).
 
Soldier 47's testimony of frustration and anger over the investigation echoes Major Mark Willetts testimony yesterday where he complained about being refused access to the room Kovco died in (Willetts was "the officer in charge of the immediate investigation") and feeling that Jake Kovco's two roommates were being less than fully forthcoming.
 
In addition, ABC notes that Soldier 30 is asserting that "some of the claims made about his troops during the course of the inquiry are simply not true" specifically he refutes Soldier 21's claim that "quick draw" games were played with weapons. Two weeks ago, Soldier 30 (who spoke today as he spoke then -- via video-link from Baghdad) asserted that he had given orders that the death/crime scene not be preserved for morale issues  Soldier 21, the section commander,  is most famous for issuing a statement following the death of Jake Kovco that he heard a cry (in the barracks) of "Allah Akbar" which translates as "God is great."  When Soldier 21 testified to the inquiry earlier this month, he renounced that assertion.  Then, as
Sydney 2GB reported, "He told the inquiry it had become unclear whether he'd in fact heard the comment."
 
In other legal news, on April 26th, Hashim Ibrahim Awad died in Hamdania after being allegedly kidnapped by US troops.  Charged with kidnapping and the killing were the "Pendelton Eight" -- Saul H. Lopezromo, Derek I. Lewis, Henry D. Lever, Lawrence G. Hutchins II, Trent D. Thomas, Tyler Jackson,  Marshall Magincadla, and Jerry E. Schumate Jr.   Thomas Watkins (AP) reports that four of the eight want to skip the Article 32 hearing and instead "proceed straight to trial." Reportedly, John Jodka III's attorney was the one who made the request first (and did so on Friday) which isn't in the AP report.  Reportedly not all involved were informed of the request when it was first made. Jerry E. Shumate was the last to join the four in making the request.  Watkins reports that the military has denied the request and the Article 32 hearing could start as early as August 28th.  But Gidget Fuentes (Navy Times) reports the schedule for the hearings as: September 12th: Jerry E. Shumate Jr.; September 25th: Marshall L. Magincalda, Robert B. Pennington, John J. Jodka, Melson J. Bacos; and October 18th: Lawrence G. Hutchins, Trent D. Thomas and Tyler A. Jackson. 
 
 
 
 
 
The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.
 
 
 

Get your email and more, right on the new Yahoo.com
Posted by at
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)