Saturday, June 15, 2013

Nutty Naomi Wolf

feminist naomi wolf

That's Isaiah's  The World Today Just Nuts "'Feminist' Naomi Wolf speaks" from October 25, 2009.  And the nutty Naomi just gets nuttier.


Naomi Wolf, Jew for Jesus, weighs in to let us know, she's been having some scary thoughts!!!!!

Keep popping those pills, Naomi, your in-laws really want custody, so keep popping those pills and keep acting crazy, you've exhausted the patience of your ex and your in-laws want your children.

In her self-medicated haze, Naomi's seeing things and what she's seeing, these signs, tell her whistle-blower Ed Snowden isn't really a whistle-blower.

What is he?

A CIA agent trying to trick the world.

Proof?

Well, he doesn't act like a whistle-blower.

Oh, we're back to that are we?

Naomi, of course, burned her final feminist bridges when she decided she could determine whether or not someone was a rape victim by how they acted.

Now the zaftig zany not only knows how a rape victim acts but she knows how a whistle-blower acts as well!

Here's the only 'act' Naomi knows: A man walking out.

Naomi's experienced that over and over throughout her life.  If she were honest, she'd admit that all the men who've walked out on her -- and they've all walked on her -- were different and walked out in different ways.

And rape is an act of violence that happens to a person and it will impact each person differently.  Whistle-blowing is an act that makes a person a whistle-blower.  There is no way to determine who a whistle-blower is.  Naomi's watched Minority Report zonked out on pills one time too many.

Could Ed Snowden not be what he seems?

On one level, I'm sure he's not.  If I've got a camera on me and I'm speaking to the press, I'm much more focused and much more collected than I would be otherwise.  In an interview, I perform.  I would assume that to some degree -- because I'm nothing exceptional -- that most people do to some degree.

So I don't believe that the videotape of Ed is 100% Ed.  I'm also aware that there are pieces written about me that shock friends -- in a good way or a bad way -- because they don't recognize the person on the page.  The thing captured on the page isn't a person.  You can't capture a person in anything short of a novel -- because you need that much space and you need to be allowed to invent to truly capture a person.

But in terms of what Ed Snowden's saying and the basics, yeah, he sound believable.  I'm sure that when the cameras are off, his hair's probably not always so neat and he probably has some ratty t-shirt that he loves and still wears although it should probably be trashed because it's falling apart.

That doesn't make him fake or false.

I have no idea what happened to Naomi, maybe she's doubling up on meds, who knows?

Naomi being Naomi she has to be bitchy.  And here's why you should blow her off:

 In stories that intelligence services are advancing (I would call the prostitutes-with-the-secret-service such a story), there are great sexy or sex-related mediagenic visuals that keep being dropped in, to keep media focus on the issue. That very pretty pole-dancing Facebooking girlfriend who appeared for, well, no reason in the media coverage…and who keeps leaking commentary, so her picture can be recycled in the press…really, she happens to pole-dance?


She wrote that.  Bitchy Naomi wrote it.

It's the equivalent of Dick Durbin sneering about "a security guard."

Who the hell does Naomi think she is?

And I don't believe the woman's a 'pole dancer' either.  There's nothing wrong with being a stripper.  But I believe the woman is a trained dancer who dances with a troupe.  I haven't been following that because the woman's not part of the story.

But Naomi can't pass up any chance to trash women.  So this woman whose name most of us don't even know, is dragged through the mud by Naomi as a "pole dancer."  Naomi is not a feminist.  She's a bitchy little girl who hated Mommy because Mommy took Daddy from her.  That's her whole pathetic life story and it repeats in every damn relationship she has and goes to why she is so very toxic and so very dangerous for women.

Ed Snowden's a whistle-blower.  If Naomi can put down the pills and come up with a valid reason why he's not, I might make the time to listen.  But I have no interest in indulging her chemically fueled fantasies.  She insists she's not calling into question Glenn Greenwald's reporting.

Seriously?  That's exactly what she's doing.  She's saying Ed Snowden is a con man, a double agent, and the Glenn was played for a sap.  How is that not calling into question his reporting?  If Naomi's in a sharing mood, she should get her ass to an NA meeting and start getting the help she so desperately needs.








The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.