Statement: “A media person blatantly lying to cover something up wouldn’t be a good thing.”
Reaction in real world: “Yeah that’s probably true.”
Reaction in Political/Media Twitter: “You’re clearly a horrible person for saying that.”
- I truly think Joy Reid's "hacking" claims deserve to be dispassionately considered. What's troubling tho is the instantaneous defense of her among media elites, even as the facts of her allegations are being called into question: https://www.thedailybeast.com/claims-by-joy-reids-cybersecurity-expert-fall-apart … https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/04/experts-question-joy-reids-claim-of-being-hacked.html …
- I was at the @DenverPressClub dinner last nite. It was a room full of good people trying under tough circumstances to preserve journalism & media credibility in one of the fastest growing cities. When the media industry so publicly defends potential lying, it hurts those efforts.
- This kind of response is an attempt to pretend the issue isn't about lying. At issue is both the posts & the potential lying about "hacking." The potential lying is a huge issue - trying to pretend that's not an issue is, unto itself, yet more dishonesty. https://www.thedailybeast.com/claims-by-joy-reids-cybersecurity-expert-fall-apart …
- There is no form of class solidarity more powerful than the solidarity between a TV host and a pundit desperate to be booked for some airtime.
- Imagine if pundits mobilized as forcefully for universal health care or tougher Wall Street regulations as they have mobilized to defend Joy Reid.