No, I don't see the point of this either

Reading through e-mails in the public account, I found a Tweet someone e-mailed about.

1.  Dr. Thomas Hoke Retweeted

    🇺🇸~Lori~ 🇺🇸 ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ #WWG1WGA‏ @TrumpsGAGirl 16h16 hours ago

   AMERICAN’S were saved & Terrorist’s died...That’s the Job of a True Commander In Chief... And anyone taking issue with Pres. Trump’s response in protecting US needs to GTHO... YOU don’t deserve the FREEDOM OUR Country & OUR Soldiers selflessly provide!

    Turning Point USA

   />

   0:16

   318K views

   193 replies3,848 retweets5,653 likes

    

    

Donald Trump's a true commander in chief? 

That's an opinion and I'm sure the woman can make her case for it. 

But the logical flaw -- which goes beyond opinion -- is Hillary and Benghazi.


Hillary Clinton was not president.  There is much that went wrong with regards to Benghazi and I've called her out for her testimony (did so on the day she testified to Congress) but she was Secretary of State, not president.  She did not have the role of commander in chief.

She also didn't go on every network the following Sunday and tell lies -- that was Susan Rice.  They wanted Hillary to do that but she was too smart to be their patsy.

There are many things I call Hillary out for but I agree with the e-mailer this is deliberately dishonest.

If the woman had Barack's picture in place of Hillary's they'd have a stronger argument.  Instead, everyone's probably just scratching their heads over this Tweet and thinking, "Does this woman know that Hillary wasn't the president?"