In the US, the race for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination continues. Rape enabler Deval Patrick has entered the ring. SLATE's Jim Newell offers:
Deval Patrick
If only theories mattered.
Unlike certain would-be candidates considering
entrances into the race whose names rhyme with Doomberg and Pillory, the
former Massachusetts governor can, at least, draw up a plausible theory
on paper for his newly launched candidacy. The field still lacks a
formidable center-left consensus candidate who can bridge the party from
Joe Biden on one end and Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders on the
other. Pete Buttigieg is trying to do it, but his base is too lily-white
to break out after New Hampshire. Patrick—who, like Buttigieg, is
trying to push against both the center and the left in his early messaging—would,
in theory, have some purchase in New Hampshire, given his history as
governor of the neighboring state to which many Granite Staters commute,
and, in theory, translate that into a strong finish in South Carolina,
where he could, again in theory,
have a relative advantage as a black American. Aren’t these neat
theories? Can’t you see how an unemployed consultant needing a paycheck
might excitably pitch it to Patrick? How wealthy donors, in a lather
about Elizabeth Warren, might be taken with it? It’s so neat, so
consultant-driven, and so pitchable to dumb donors that the Surge is
comfortable predicting that Patrick is doomed to go absolutely nowhere. To wit.
Search results
- My goodness. No no and no again. This is a dealbreaker for me. Deval Patrick's former brother-in-law gets prison time in rape, kidnapping
- In 2014, Deval Patrick fired the head of the state’s Sex Offender Registry Board because she questioned why Patrick’s brother in law wasn’t required to register for a 1993 spousal rape conviction. #Trump2020
- https://twitter.com/mldauber/status/1194992096022683648 … In 2014 Deval Patrick fired leaders of his state's Sex Offender Registry for trying to force his brother in law to register due to being convicted of rape in California in 1993. In 2019, that same rapist was sentenced to 6 years for another rape....
https://twitter.com/mldauber/status/1194992096022683648 …
In 2014 Deval Patrick fired leaders of his state's Sex Offender Registry for trying to force his brother in law to register due to being convicted of rape in California in 1993.
In 2019, that same rapist was sentenced to 6 years for another rape....
For those confused by "family matter,'' refer to this HEAVY article and how the response by Deval's campaign was to insist this was a family matter and the children!!!! the poor children!!!! They never knew and now they did wah!!! Wah!!!! Wah!!!!
If you're convicted of a crime -- and, yes, rape is a crime, don't whine that your children found out about it because of the press. You were convicted of a crime. That was a public case. Maybe you talk to your children about it. But you don't whine, "They reported on my being convicted!!!! Oh the babies, the poor little babies!!!"
Grow the hell up.
And we don't need a rape enabler, a rape apologist, running for the White House. Any person even aware of optics would be insisting Deval drop out. That months after this rapist brother-in-law was sentenced Deval is thinking of running speaks of something far worse than mere arrogance.
- People out here stannin for Deval Patrick? Please go sit the f**k on down. Deval Patrick fired the leader's of the Sex Offender Registry in his state in 2014. Why? Tried to register his bro-in-law as a sex offender. Dude raped Deval's sister. Spousal rape. CANCELLED
Meanwhile, at IN THESE TIMES, Branko Marcetik maintains:
Once known as the lone, forthright voice of liberalism
on cable news, MSNBC began a lurch to the center in 2015 with its new
chairman, Andrew Lack, going on a conservative pundit hiring spree and
shedding the network’s “Lean Forward” branding.
Even so, MSNBC is positioned to have an outsized influence on the 2020 Democratic presidential primary. According to the Norman Lear Center, liberals watch MSNBC at (respectively) three and 10 times the rate of more moderate and conservative viewers. After Fox News, MSNBC is the most-watched cable news network, beating out CNN. What’s more, the median age of MSNBC’s audience is 65—and older voters turn out in high numbers in primary contests.
Even so, MSNBC is positioned to have an outsized influence on the 2020 Democratic presidential primary. According to the Norman Lear Center, liberals watch MSNBC at (respectively) three and 10 times the rate of more moderate and conservative viewers. After Fox News, MSNBC is the most-watched cable news network, beating out CNN. What’s more, the median age of MSNBC’s audience is 65—and older voters turn out in high numbers in primary contests.
To understand how MSNBC may be shaping the 2020 election, In These Times analyzed the network’s August and September coverage
of the Democratic presidential contest’s leading candidates—Sen. Bernie
Sanders, former Vice President Joe Biden and Sen. Elizabeth Warren. We
focused on the network’s flagship primetime shows: The 11th Hour
with Brian Williams, All In with Chris Hayes, The Beat with Ari Melber,
Hardball with Chris Matthews, The Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell and The Rachel Maddow Show.
In These Times tallied how often the three candidates were discussed and logged whether the coverage was positive, negative or neutral. For example, while poll results by themselves (whether favorable or unfavorable to a candidate) were simply logged as neutral, commentary about a candidate “surging” was logged as positive and “stagnant” as negative. Clips and previews for upcoming segments were not included.
The coverage quickly revealed a pattern. Over the two months, these six programs focused on Biden, often to the exclusion of Warren and Sanders. Sanders received not only the least total coverage (less than one-third of Biden’s), but the most negative. As to the substance, MSNBC’s reporting revolved around poll results and so-called electability.
In These Times tallied how often the three candidates were discussed and logged whether the coverage was positive, negative or neutral. For example, while poll results by themselves (whether favorable or unfavorable to a candidate) were simply logged as neutral, commentary about a candidate “surging” was logged as positive and “stagnant” as negative. Clips and previews for upcoming segments were not included.
The coverage quickly revealed a pattern. Over the two months, these six programs focused on Biden, often to the exclusion of Warren and Sanders. Sanders received not only the least total coverage (less than one-third of Biden’s), but the most negative. As to the substance, MSNBC’s reporting revolved around poll results and so-called electability.
Let's hope they did better with their number crunching than they did with their research on MSNBC's 'history.'
It was never a liberal channel. After hitting the gutter with Mike Savage's hiring, they tried to regroup with Keith Olbermann. Keith was a known sexist who never would have survived in today's #MeToo culture. We didn't quote him, we didn't note him. He was supposedly the biggest liberal on TV (he wasn't). He gets Rachel Maddow on the channel. That would be the same Rachel that supported the Iraq War. That would be the same Rachel who then got an AIR AMERICA show (UNFILTERED) in 2004 where she -- like Al Franken -- would argue that you couldn't talk about withdrawal of US troops from Iraq and the troops were already there so you do nothing. You certainly don't invite on antiwar activists. The closest UNFILTERED came to an antiwar activist was Arianna Huffington -- and even with Arianna they were struggling.
Randi Rhodes would rightly mock and call out Rachel's big Iraq special that she did on MSNBC.
MSNBC got rid of Cenk Uygur in 2011. (Cenk is not a liberal but he was too much for MSNBC.) MSNBC launched one attack after another on Cindy Sheehan -- including Norah O'Donnell's hideous June 2006 attack. MSNBC couldn't find war resisters when other networks could.
They were always loud, they were just never left.
In Iraq, the protests continue.
#Iraq
Today in city Kut south east of #Baghdad, AlAmareh province
People protest against Iran regime puppets
#العراق_ينتقض #IraqProtests
A new development?
A lion joins Iraq’s protests http://dlvr.it/RJLQg0
- MEANWHILE IN #IRAQ Iraqi protesters bring LION to the protesting areas after security forces intervened protests with Police dogs.
Some may think that's comic or cute. It's not, it's stupid.
The lion is placed in danger, absolutely.
More to the point, tear gas and sonic booms are taking place. How is the lion going to react to that? If the lion panics -- a natural response -- might the lion harms people around -- such as the protesters.
Just the fact that danger is possible from this incredibly stupid move could provide the government with cover to shut down the protests.
This was beyond stupid.
Over 310 protesters have been killed in the last month with another 15,000 injured. And into that climate, you're bringing an animal?
Beyond stupid.
In other news, Ali Choukeir (24 MATINS) reports:
Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani said authorities must respond quickly to the demands of the protesters who have thronged Baghdad and cities across the mainly Shiite south since early October in an outpouring of anger over rampant corruption and lack of jobs.
“If those in power think that they can evade the benefits of real reform by stalling and procrastination, they are delusional,” Sistani said in his weekly sermon, delivered by a representative in the Shiite holy city of Karbala
“What comes after these protests will not be the same as before, and they should be aware of that.”
Mustafa Habib reports:
Breaking: In a tough speech, the senior cleric in #Iraq Ali #Sistani slaps the whole political class:- "I support the demonstrations & condemned the killing-Kidnapping of protesters, and the govt has not implemented any real demand of the #IraqProtests so far. (1)
Mustafa Habib's reporting frequently appears at NIQASH and they have a number of reports on the protests throughout Iraq on their home page.
The following sites updated:
Joe Henry's Next Second Chance
1 hour ago
THIRD’s Highlights
6 hours ago
Another rape because of Deval Patrick
6 hours ago
Deval Patrick = rape enabler
6 hours ago
TV and Mo'nique
6 hours ago
Mike Flugennock is correct
8 hours ago
The farce drags along
9 hours ago
It's pretty obvious: Medicare For All
9 hours ago
Thursday Reads
11 hours ago
Bolivia Does Not Exist
15 hours ago
Featured Panelists: November 15, 2019
17 hours ago
