Earlier this week, Senator Mazie Hirono's office issued the following:
February 26, 2020
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Senator Mazie K. Hirono (D-Hawaii), a member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, and Congressman Raúl M. Grijalva (D-Ariz.), Chair of the House Committee on Natural Resources sent a letter asking the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to investigate the Department of the Interior’s (DOI) grant and cooperative agreement review process.
The letter requests that GAO investigate DOI’s process for awarding grants and cooperative agreements, including what procedures govern the review process, the ways in which reviews differ from previous Administrations’ processes, and any scientific, economic, or jobs-related consequences this new process may produce.
This joint letter follows media reports of potential political interference in DOI-funded studies on health effects of mountaintop removal mining and the inspection program for offshore oil and gas production.
“Awards from DOI should be based on the merits to ensure the most productive use of taxpayer funding. We are concerned that this policy allows political appointees at the Department of the Interior to steer grant funds and cooperative agreements toward or away from certain recipients for reasons other than merit,” the lawmakers wrote.
A signed PDF of the letter can be downloaded here. The full text of the letter is below:
February 26, 2020
The Honorable Gene Dodaro
Comptroller General of the United States
Government Accountability Office
441 G St. NW
Washington, DC 20548
Dear Mr. Dodaro:
In December 2017, the Department of the Interior (DOI) issued guidance establishing a new process for approving discretionary grants and cooperative agreements. The guidance generally states that grants and cooperative agreements to certain categories of recipients, such as universities and public interest groups, must receive high-level scrutiny by political appointees within Interior prior to approval. The guidance further threatens retaliation against grant and cooperative agreement programs that do not comply, stating in bold type, “Instances circumventing the Secretarial priorities or the review process will cause greater scrutiny and will result in slowing down the approval process for all awards.”
Awards from DOI should be based on the merits to ensure the most productive use of taxpayer funding. We are concerned that this policy allows political appointees at the Department of the Interior to steer grant funds and cooperative agreements toward or away from certain recipients for reasons other than merit. For example, DOI ordered the National Academies of Sciences to halt a study on the health effects of mountaintop removal mining on local communities, the findings of which would have likely undermined the administration's goal of expanding domestic fossil fuel production.
We are requesting that GAO examine Interior’s grants and cooperative agreements review process, including
- a delineation of the overall grants and cooperative agreements approval process and what has changed;
- policies, procedures, and controls governing the grant and cooperative agreement process;
- trends in funding grants or cooperative agreement awards, including an analysis of grants and cooperative agreements that have been subject to this expanded level of review;
- impacts of changes to the grants and cooperative agreements process, including economic impacts and impacts of denying and delaying awards on jobs;
- whether grant and cooperative agreement funds have been redirected; and
- information on the timeliness of reviews and outcomes.
Sincerely,
###
