Tuesday, August 11, 2026

The Snapshot

Tuesday, August 11, 2026.  Chump smuggled out of Air Force One, Homeland Security targeting our troops and our troops families for deportation, the deeply unpopular Pete Hegseth continues struggling and unable to perform his job, Blanche refuses to assist New Mexico in their investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, and much more.





Chump's an embarrassment this morning.  Ben touches on Chump's departure from Turkey.  Lawrence O'Donnell addressed it last night. 




Top administration officials engaged in an elaborate deception to spirit President Trump out of Turkey during the NATO summit there last month, transporting him in a catering container to a military jet because of a threat against him and Air Force One from Iran, two senior U.S. officials said on Monday.

Mr. Trump and other officials had said publicly that he would be leaving Turkey on July 8 aboard one of the older versions of Air Force One rather than a luxury 747-8 donated by Qatar that he had flown in on. Mr. Trump told reporters at the time that he was making the switch for “old time’s sake.”

Mr. Trump boarded the older plane from the left-side door in view of cameras, and news organizations, including The New York Times, reported that he had traveled on it to Britain, where he switched back to the newer plane. The Times reported at the time that the decision was driven in part by concern about the security of the new plane donated by Qatar, which had not been equipped with all of the defensive capabilities of older versions.

But instead of flying out aboard that older, powder blue, modified 747, Mr. Trump was whisked off that plane via a catering container that had been lifted to the opposite side of the plane from where the journalists traveling with him boarded, one of the U.S. officials said. The president was then taken to a third plane, which he flew in secret to Britain, the official with knowledge of the matter said.


How embarrassing.

 The Iran War continues.  


The Iranians said on Monday that any deal with Oman on controlling shipping in the Strait of Hormuz would not lead to the waterway being fully reopened until the United States agreed to several of its demands.

These demands show that the Iranians believe they are winning and that the US consistently stopping the air campaign for negotiations demonstrates US weakness.
This has emboldened Tehran, which is now demanding compliance from the US.

Iran’s demands, as ridiculous as they are, show that they believe the United States is not capable of seeing any kind of military action through and has left little to no room for compromise.
Iran said on Sunday that a deal with Oman on new shipping routes through the Strait of Hormuz was in its final stages, but the waterway would not fully reopen until the United States met Iran’s demand.


President Donald Trump told senior aides he might weasel out on his demand for a nuclear agreement so he can declare victory in the war against Iran, The Wall Street Journal reported Sunday.

The word from U.S. officials indicated that Trump’s ad nauseam declarations that the war he started in February was all about preventing Iran from having a nuclear weapon may fall by the wayside.
The Journal reported that Trump would instead tie the war’s end to Iran fully reopening the Strait of Hormuz, a critical waterway that was open before the war, and that Iran effectively shut down after the U.S. and Israeli attacks.


Meanwhile, Todd Blanche and Chump tried to swindle the American people and perpetrate a fraud on te court when the came to an agreement over Chump's IRS lawsuit.  There should have been no case to begin with because he waited too long to file it.  But he filed it and wanted millions of dollars -- tax ayer dollars -- from the US government.  And Todd, ever the Toad, rushed to sign a deal.  First, there would be the fund for the January 6ers and then there would be promise that Chump and his sons would not be audited by the IRS.  Dave Jamieson and  Arthur Delaney (HUFFINGTON POST) report:

After the Trump administration announced an unprecedented settlement giving the president and his family immunity from tax audits, the union representing workers at the Internal Revenue Service realized they had a serious problem on their hands.

Many experts believe the immunity deal is flatly illegal. So auditors who honor it and give the Trumps preferential treatment could be violating their oath of office. But those who refuse could face discipline and retaliation, said Doreen Greenwald, president of the National Treasury Employees Union.

“It puts our IRS employees between a rock and a hard place,” Greenwald told HuffPost in an interview. “They take an oath of office to follow the law and to uphold the Constitution… Then they’ll have this order that is contrary to the law, and so it puts them in a very difficult position.” 

The union joined a lawsuit as plaintiffs against President Donald Trump’s Justice Department last week, arguing that the immunity deal puts its members in an “untenable” position: carry out an unlawful order or risk their jobs.




Let's move over to the Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth.  Prissy Pete has to answer some questions.  Alexander Willis (RAW STORY) notes:


Rep. Gabe Vasquez (D-NM) is demanding answers from the Trump administration over a mysterious plane crash he alleges the U.S. military "definitely had a role to play" in, a fight one journalist called Monday a "fight worth watching.”

On May 14, a medical transport aircraft crashed into the side of a mountain after its pilots “got disoriented,” Wired first reported – a crash that coincided with nearby military testing at the White Sands Missile Range in southern New Mexico. All four occupants died.
While the crash has not been decisively linked to the nearby military testing, Vasquez launched an effort to get to the bottom of the incident with a set of demands issued to Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. Specifically, Vasquez requested a joint briefing between Transportation and Defense officials to take questions regarding the incident.

US House Rep Vasquez should not have to demand answers.  These answer should have been provided back in May. Instead, it appears likely that there was a cover up. Pete has a pattern of not doing what he's supposed to.  Which leads us to our next issue, Jack Brook and Safiyah Riddle (INDEPENDENT) report

Democrats in Congress have launched an investigation into the Trump administration’s efforts to deport troops and their families following revelations that immigration authorities have detained more than 50 spouses and parents of active-duty military personnel.

In a letter sent Sunday evening to the Department of Homeland Security, the Defense Department, and the Department of Veterans Affairs, lawmakers pledged to examine whether the Pentagon and DHS are coordinating to deport service members and their immediate families.
"These efforts imperil military readiness, weaken service members’ morale, and betray America’s promises to the people who put their lives on the line for our nation," reads the letter, which was signed by more than 60 members of Congress.

[. . .]
"Donald Trump is breaking our country’s promises to service members by tearing apart dozens of military families who were promised immigration protections," said Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren. "That’s just plain cruel, and it’s hurting our military readiness and morale."

Warren is heading the inquiry alongside Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal, Illinois Sen. Tammy Duckworth, and several House Democrats.

An Associated Press investigation found that President Donald Trump's administration has rolled back protective measures for military households, abandoning a longstanding bipartisan consensus to advance its broader deportation efforts. Consequently, some service members have had to request leave or delay deployments to care for their children following the detention of their spouses.

Congress has to protect the troops because Hegseth won't.  As we noted last week when we first covered this story, not only would Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin not have stood for this, nor would Secretary Chuck Hagel, Secretary Leon Panetta or, for that matter, Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.  This is an outrage.  It creates stress for the service member that they shouldn't be under.  And since we lack a real Secretary of Defense, the troops have to depend upon Congress on this issue and so many more. 

Let's note this from Senator Elizabeth Warren's office:

Senate investigation revealed ICE has attempted to deport 282 veterans and their relatives; could be violating law that prevents the use of military against civilians

“Service members must have confidence that their sacrifices will be honored, not used against them or to target their loved ones.”

Text of Letter (PDF)

Washington, D.C. — U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), along with Representatives Chrissy Houlahan (D-Pa.), Maggie Goodlander (D-N.H.), Delia Ramirez (D-Ill.), and Lizzie Fletcher (D-Texas) led a bicameral letter pressing the Department of Defense (DoD), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Veterans Affairs (VA), U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on their efforts to coordinate to arrest, and detain, and deport hundreds of veterans and military families.In April 2025, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) rescinded its long-standing policy that treated military service a “significant mitigating factor” when deciding whether to pursue immigration enforcement, and replaced it with a new policy stating that military service alone “does not automatically exempt” non-citizens from enforcement actions. 

In September 2025, Senator Warren opened an investigation into the impacts of these policy changes on military families. The investigation revealed that ICE has attempted to deport 282 veterans and their relatives. But DHS refused to disclose the number of active-duty troops and their families who have been threatened by the administration’s policy.

But new reports indicate that DoDand DHS appear to be coordinating to convert military bases into “traps” for individuals this administration deems deportable and has  detained non-citizens during routine check-ins, visits, and drop-offs at or near military installations. At the same time, DoD has continued to recruit new service members with the promise of immigration protections. 

Recent reporting by the Associated Press reveals that, since January 2025, more than 50 parents and spouses of active-duty service members have been detained, and at least six have been deported. ICE’s statistics show that the agency has arrested 16 non-citizen armed forces members since the beginning of Fiscal Year 2026. Some service members have reportedly needed to take leave or delay deployment because ICE detained their families. 

“These efforts imperil military readiness, weaken service members’ morale, and betray America’s promises to the people who put their lives on the line for our nation,” wrote the lawmakers. Alarmingly, DoD has been reportedly targeting individuals at military installations, detaining them on military property, and turning them over to ICE — effectively converting military bases into “traps” for noncitizens. For example, a 22-year-old military wife was recently detained while attempting to obtain a military spouse I.D. Military officials allegedly called DHS and held her in a room until ICE agents arrived to take her to a detention center. 

“DoD’s participation in civil immigration enforcement activities raises both ethical and legal concerns, including potential violations of the Posse Comitatus Act, which prohibits using the armed forces of the military for civilian law enforcement,” wrote the lawmakers. 

The coalition warned that if service members were to be swept up in any of these enforcement actions, it could separately constitute a violation of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, which provides protections to all members of the United States military on active duty, including non-citizens, from civil actions—such as immigration proceedings—that interfere with their military duties. 

“Service members must have confidence that their sacrifices will be honored, not used against them or to target their loved ones,” wrote the lawmakers. “DoD’s new anti-immigrant practices risk deterring future recruits and damaging the credibility of military recruitment efforts—which promised to care for service members even after their time in uniform.”

The lawmakers requested that the agencies explain the enhanced coordination between DoD and DHS, restore long-standing immigration protections for family members of service members, and explain what steps they are taking to protect troops, veterans, and their families from unjust immigration enforcement by August 23, 2026.

The letter was signed by Senators Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.), Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), Andy Kim (D-N.J.), Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Patty Murray (D-Wash.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.), Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Brian Schatz (D-HI), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.), Peter Welch (D-Vt.), and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.).

Representatives Yassamin Ansari (D-Ariz.), Nanette Barragán (D-Calif.), André Carson (D-Ind.), Greg Casar (D-Texas), Sean Casten (D-Ill.), Joaquin Castro (D-Texas), Gil Cisneros (D-Calif.), Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-N.J.), Daniel Davis (D-Ill.), Madeleine Dean (D-Pa.), Diana DeGette (D-Colo.), Mark DeSaulnier (D-Calif.), Maxine Dexter (D-Ore.), Veronica Escobar (D-Texas), Bill Foster (D-Ill.), Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.), Chuy García (D-Ill.), Sylvia Garcia (D-Texas), Adelita Grijalva (D-Ariz.), Jonathan Jackson (D-Ill.), Hank Johnson (D-Ga.), Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), John Larson (D-Conn.), Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.), Seth Magaziner (D-R.I.), Seth Moulton (D-Mass.), Kevin Mullin (D-Calif.), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), Mike Quigley (D-Ill.), Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.), Lateefah Simon (D-Calif.), Marilyn Strickland (D-Wash.), Suhas Subramanyam (D-Va.), Mark Takano (D-Calif.), Dina Titus (D-Nev.), Marc Veasey (D-Texas), Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), and Gabe Vasquez (D-N.M.), joined in signing the letter.

The letter was endorsed by the Immigration Defenders Law Center, the Seattle Clemency Project, Common Defense, Repatriate Our Patriots, and League of United Latin American Citizens.

“It is hard to imagine a more profound betrayal than targeting service members, veterans, and military families for deportation,” said Jennie Pasquarella, interim executive director of the Seattle Clemency Project. “This administration is abandoning decades of bipartisan policies that recognized a simple truth: protecting those who serve makes our military stronger and our nation safer. Targeting the very communities that have sacrificed for this country is not just morally indefensible, it is a direct attack on military readiness, recruitment, and trust.”

“This administration has made a conscious decision to abandon its promises to military families and fail those who put their lives on the line for our nation,” said Amanda Schuft, director of legal services at Immigrant Defenders Law Center. “We have seen the devastating human cost firsthand. Our client, the father of an active-duty Army service member, was detained by ICE despite suffering from terminal renal failure, forcing his son to take leave from military service to plead for his release and provide evidence of his grave medical condition. The government ignored those pleas. After his health deteriorated in detention, our client was eventually released, only to die within weeks.”

“Family readiness directly impacts mission readiness. Behind every military spouse or parent in detention is a servicemember who could deploy at any moment. Without a strong homefront, we cannot have a ready force. Our government must honor its commitments to those who serve,” said Danitza G. James, MSW, President, Repatriate Our Patriots. 

Senator Warren has led the fight to hold the Trump administration accountable for mishandling military funds to pursue its cruel immigration agenda and has continuously fought for the safety and well-being of our servicemembers and veterans:

  • In May 2026, Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) released new answers from Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and the Department of Defense revealing the Pentagon’s financial support for the Trump administration’s cruel immigration agenda was far higher than initially reported by DoD.
  • In April 2026, Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), along with Representative Delia Ramirez (D-Ill.) and Representative Troy Carter (D-La.), urged the Inspectors General of the Departments of Homeland Security and State to open an investigation into the Trump administration’s attempts to deport people to countries they have no ties to. These deportations use the military to conduct the international deportation flights and detain noncitizens on U.S. military bases within the United States and overseas.
  • In March 2026, Senator Warren (D-Mass.) and Representative Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) led 52 members of Congress in a new investigation into potential corruption in government contracts stemming from the White House’s fast-tracked expansion of inhumane warehouse-based immigration detention facilities using a Navy contracting vehicle.
  • In March 2026, U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) released new data obtained from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) revealing that the Trump administration has attempted to deport hundreds of veterans and their family members after promising immigration protections at the time of recruitment. 
  • In January 2026, following a new report by the Congressional Budget Office revealing Trump’s domestic deployments of the National Guard and Marines have cost at least $589 million — more than double what Senator Warren’s bicameral investigation previously found — she called for the Trump administration to “answer for wasting more than half a billion taxpayer dollars.”
  • In December 2025, at a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee, U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) pressed Trump’s nominee to be Army General Counsel, on the deployment of the National Guard and reports that senior Judge Advocate General (JAG) officers have been sidelined after raising legal concerns about military operations.
  • In December 2025, Senator Warren (D-Mass.) and Representative John Garamendi (D-Calif.) co-led the release of a new report, along with 11 other members of Congress, revealing the Trump administration diverted more than $2 billion of military funds and resources from the Pentagon to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for immigration enforcement and its impact on readiness and morale. The report also revealed that the diversion of funds was happening at the expense of updates to barracks, maintenance hangers, and military construction projects in the Pacific.
  • In October 2025, Senator Warren (D-Mass.) joined colleagues in requesting that CBO provide an independent assessment of the projected costs associated with the Trump administration’s deployment of the National Guard to U.S. cities.
  • In September 2025, U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), and Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), along with Representatives Chrissy Houlahan (D-Pa.), Maggie Goodlander (D-N.H.), and Delia C. Ramirez (D-Ill.), led 55 members of Congress in opening a new investigation into the Trump administration’s arrest, detention, and deportation of non-citizen service members, veterans, and military families.  
  • In September 2025, Senator Warren (D-Mass.) led more than 60 members of Congress in opening a new investigation into the Trump administration’s practice of detaining and sending immigrants to countries where they have no citizenship or connections of any kind. These deportations use the military to conduct the international deportation flights and detain noncitizens on U.S. military bases within the United States and overseas.
  • In February 2025, Senators Warren (D-Mass.) and Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) pressed Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth on the military’s deployment of active-duty forces to the southern border and Guantanamo and the Department of Defense’s (DOD) new involvement in immigration detention and deportation.

###






Stockpiles of weapons?  They have apparently dwindled under Hegseth's 'leadership.'  Prissy Pete can't seem to manage costs.  Wasn't he ordering lobsters to waste tax payer money?  Yes, he was. Alexa Mae Asperin (FOX 11) reported March 11th:

A government watchdog report reveals the Pentagon, under Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, spent $6.9 million on lobster tails during a single month in late 2025.
The expenditure was part of a record-breaking $93.4 billion "use-it-or-lose-it" spree in September that included ribeye steaks, king crab, and luxury furniture.
Critics and lawmakers are slamming the optics of the spending, contrasting the "surf and turf" budget with the administration's public push for federal efficiency.


So he could have used that $93.4 billion to order more weapons.  But he didn't.  No, he wasted it.  He wasted $93.4 billion.  And now he's begging for more money.  And Congress isn't feeling like giving it to him.  Connor O'Brien and Mark Satter (POLITICO) report

In the year and a half since Pete Hegseth squeaked through his Senate confirmation, congressional Republicans have handed the Pentagon chief big wins — and defended some of his most controversial moves.

But now that GOP unity is splintering under the weight of President Donald Trump’s party-line push for the biggest defense budget in modern history.
Senators left town last week for their summer break no closer to enacting the crown jewel of Hegseth’s agenda, a $1.5 trillion defense budget that would stamp Trump’s mark across the military, from new battleshipsto a Golden Dome missile defense shield.

Hegseth hasn’t persuaded Republicans to steamroll Democrats and advance the record-breaking plan, despite regularly trekking to the Hill in recent weeks and hobnobbing with lawmakers. Instead, an increasingly vocal group of GOP lawmakers argue the administration hasn’t explained why Republicans should burn valuable political capital in pursuit of Trump’s vision — especially with the midterms just months away.

“So much of that additional defense funding is banking on not only a third, but potentially a fourth reconciliation [bill]," said Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska). “So what if that doesn't come? I’ve asked [Pentagon officials]: you have your F-35s, your Patriot missiles baked into that — what’s your plan B? And it’s been tough to get an answer.”



He wants a trillion and a half. And he spent 93.4 billion in September on lobsters and other items.  Now he's begging for more money for the next fiscal year.  The 2026 Fiscal Year budget was a record $1 trillion and now he's asking for more.  And maybe it's past time that Congress stops these last month of the fiscal year splurges on lobsters and other items.  If you haven't spent it -- on DoD -- then you didn't need it and needs to go back into the general fund. This is amazing that this spending splurge took place at a time when Chump was trumpeting his ridiculous and corrupt DOGE as a way to stop unnecessary spending by the government. 

Ahmad Austin Jr. (MEDIAITE) notes Hegseth's 'popularity' or lack thereof: 

During a segment on Monday’s CNN News Central, Enten highlighted the fact that Hegseth has become the least popular member of President Donald Trump’s cabinet. According to polling data from Quinnipiac and Fox News, Hegseth’s net approval rating was a staggering -22. Trailing behind Hegseth were Vice President JD Vance (-17), Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (-9), and Secretary of State Marco Rubio (-8).
“Pete Hegseth, as I said, the lowest of the low,” Enten said. “Twenty-two points underwater, and this has been something that’s been going on throughout the entire administration. He has been underwater in every single poll that I could find. That is his job disapproval rating being above his job approval rating, and Iran has not helped.”


Turning to Chump's roll dog from the 80s, 90s, 00s and 10s Jeffrey Epstein.


Chump thought he could escape his ties to Epstein.  He can't anymore than he can end the Iran War quickly.  John F. Harris (POLITICO) observes:

Seven years ago today, Jeffrey Epstein was found hanging in a Manhattan jail, and the usual reactions to a sudden, violent death were reversed.

It was the people who abhorred the convicted sex offender — his victims and all who sympathized with them — who were stricken with sadness and anger. Now, they feared, the full truth about this man and his odious life would never come out.
It was Epstein’s friends and far-reaching galaxy of influential associates who surely allowed themselves a quiet moment of relief back in 2019. Now, they had reason to hope, the full truth about this man and his odious life would never come out.

The anniversary of Epstein’s demise is occasion to note two paradoxes that have emerged over those seven years — and most vividly in recent months, as it has become clear Epstein was a more consequential figure, and more emblematic of a sordid age, even than we knew at the time. Both paradoxes come courtesy, however grudgingly or unintentionally, of Epstein’s one-time friend, President Donald Trump.

The first is the surprising degree to which the truth did indeed come out, and answers were not left hanging with Epstein in Cell 220 on the ninth floor of the Metropolitan Correctional Center.

Yes, there are important matters of detail that remain clouded by mystery. These include the precise details of how Epstein killed himself, in a supposedly secure facility, according to the official medical examiner’s conclusion (which some still doubt), as well as a full illumination of his relationship with Trump and why it apparently dissolved early in the 2000s. Many of the survivors of Epstein’s crimes also remain distraught and hungry for more answers.
But the nature of Epstein’s monstrously manipulative character, and the ease with which he ensnared some of the planet’s wealthiest and in many cases most accomplished people is now commonly understood — in a way that it almost certainly would not be if he had lived. Perhaps he would have reached a settlement with prosecutors, or gone to trial under rules of evidence focused narrowly on a few crimes rather than receiving scrutiny over the broad contours of his life. Any Epstein associates who exhaled in gratitude at his passing in 2019 had it exactly wrong — the ruin of reputations caused by this scandal was only beginning.


Meanwhile, an investigation into Epstein's crimes is taking place in New Mexico.


The US Justice Dept has been very little help to the investigation.  As a result, Vincent Rodriguez (KOAT) reports, "The New Mexico Department of Justice has announced it has filed a lawsuit in federal court against Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and the U.S. Department of Justice over files related to the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and the Zorro Ranch."  Terence Repelente (INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS TIMES) adds, "Attorney General Raúl Torrez filed a federal lawsuit seeking complete and unredacted records connected to Epstein and his New Mexico property, arguing that the documents are crucial to the state's criminal investigation. The suit was reportedly filed in Washington, DC, and accuses the Justice Department of stonewalling access to material that could identify witnesses, victims and alleged participants in crimes at the ranch."  On Wednesday, The Epstein Truth Commission issued an interim report.  John Rupolo (KOAT) notes:

The report states that five women and girls were abused at Zorro Ranch between 1996 and 2012, but the commission believes the number is higher.

"The commission has counted at least 30 other individuals who potentially were abused in New Mexico, people we cannot yet confirm in most cases because their names are blacked out of the federal record," the commission said.

Between 1992 and 2019, Epstein's aircraft made 227 flights into New Mexico, with Epstein himself on 140 of those flights.

"But the most important numbers on this slide are the ones that might be missing. Eighty of those flights that we have obtained on the lists contain no passenger information at all, and roughly 26 passengers appear as female first names or initials," the commission said.  


Ethan Manera (NEWSTALK ZB) notes New Zealand nationals Brice and Karen Gordon being noted in the interim report out of New Mexico: 

Now, an investigatory committee led by New Mexico lawmakers into Epstein’s crimes in the state has shed fresh light on the Gordons’ involvement in Epstein’s affairs. 

An interim report, released by the New Mexico Truth Commission, describes the Gordons as being in Epstein’s “inner circle” as employees at the ranch property, and details Brice Gordon’s involvement in supplying masseuses for Epstein. 

Epstein’s longtime pilot, Larry Visoski, testified at Ghislaine Maxwell’s sex trafficking trial in 2021 that Gordon told him he had “arranged for masseuses from a Santa Fe spa, Ten Thousand Waves, to visit Zorro Ranch to perform massages on Epstein,” the report said. 

It also references a 2007 FBI interview with Gordon, in which the New Zealander said he typically arranged Epstein’s masseuses whenever the financier stayed at the ranch. 


Newly confirmed Attorney General Blanche will no doubt continue attempting not to cooperate with New Mexico and their inquiry into Epstein and Zorro Ranch.  Jason Miciak (RAW STORY) reports:


Short and sweet, New Mexico — as is its duty and right — intends to investigate the crimes that may or may not have occurred at "Zorro Ranch," a sprawling estate 30 miles south of Santa Fe. But its investigation continues to stall due to roadblocks and uncooperative behavior by Blanche's DOJ, to the point that New Mexico feels it has little choice but to ask a judge to order the Justice Department to deliver some justice.

In response, according to MS Now, DOJ says any reluctance is due to its deeply sincere intent to preserve the victims' anonymity: "The Justice Department said it was not releasing some information the state requested because federal court orders ban disclosing “victim-identifying information carte blanche, and New Mexico has provided no lawful basis to justify such sweeping disclosures.”

Hang on.

"Carte blanche"? This is not the University of New Mexico's library seeking access to the information. It's the state cops. Federal court orders banning dissemination of victims' names surely don't encompass "all other American law enforcement."

Were that the only problem. See, New Mexico isn't even suing "just to get the names of the victims."

"Torrez said his office has made 10 separate requests for key information and has been ignored or denied. "We have heard repeatedly they will cooperate and what our team has experienced is anything but cooperation," he said.

Right.

And that's a much bigger problem for Blanche than may appear at first blush. Because it's one thing to go in front of a federal judge and say, "But we cannot give this stuff out to them, and we've told them that repeatedly for 18 months now," versus that same federal judge reading an email or hearing DOJ say, "Yes, we will be getting that to you shortly," and never coming around.

Torrez says it's the second, and judges are busy enough without having the hassle of ordering you to do what you promised. Especially when it appears you might have an especially nefarious reason for holding back. Occam grabs the gavel.


On Blanche's confirmation, Alex Welch (THE WRAP) notes:

Morning Joe co-host Mika Brzezinski said the nomination “essentially came down to one vote: Republican Senator Bill Cassidy,” which provoked a huge laugh from Scarborough.

“So he’ll be responsible in history for RFK Jr. and the lunacy there and the attorney general that will conduct more retribution campaigns than anyone else in American history as well,” Scarborough added.

The MS NOW anchor was referring to the February 2025 nomination for the U.S. Health Secretary, where Cassidy was the deciding vote in confirming Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in the position.

“Good on ya, Bill,” Scarborough sarcastically quipped.

Brzezinski continued her report, saying that Cassidy was “defending his tearful vote,” but Scarborough interrupted.

“No, there’s no defense of it, Bill!” he stated. “There’s no defense of RFK Jr. I really… seriously, what was it worth for you? We’ll find out.”






The following sites updated:





Trump has MIDNIGHT MELTDOWN over CRUSHING DEFEAT!!!

From "Pure Vandalism" to "No Video or Proof" of Vandalism, Trump's Self-Contradictory Lies!