Saturday, October 03, 2009

Parliament bomb threat and continued delays in GI bill checks

A bomb scare forced the evacuation Saturday of the Iraqi parliament building after explosives-sniffing dogs alerted authorities to a possible threat an hour before lawmakers were to meet.
The Iraqi government issued no statement about whether explosives were found in the building, citing an ongoing investigation. The evacuation only heightened concerns about security breaches in Iraqi government buildings, which were targeted in August by coordinated bombings that killed 100 people and injured hundreds of others.
Five members of parliament told McClatchy that they learned of the threat when security guards blocked them from entering the hall where they were scheduled to discuss two contentious topics: rewriting Iraqi election law and a corruption investigation in the Electricity Ministry. The area was evacuated, the politicians said, and the session was postponed to Sunday.


The above is from Mohammed al Dulaimy's "Bomb scare forces evacuation of Iraqi parliament" (McClatchy Newspapers) on what happened following a bomb sniffing dog detecting some 'issue' in an area of Parliament which was 'confirmed' with other dogs. Meanwhile, Anthony Shadid explores explosions of a personal sort in "In Anbar, U.S.-Allied Tribal Chiefs Feel Deep Sense of Abandonment" (Washington Post)where Sahwa ("Awakening," "Sons Of Iraq") like Raed Sabah express sentiments of betrayal:

"The Americans left without even saying goodbye. Not one of them," Sabah said in his villa in Ramadi, the capital of Anbar, once the cradle of Iraq's insurgency. "Even when we called them, we got a message that the line had been disconnected."
Nowhere is the U.S. departure from Iraq more visible than in Anbar, where the 27 bases and outposts less than a year ago have dwindled to three today. Far less money is being spent. Since November, more than two-thirds of combat troops have departed. In their wake is a blend of cynicism and bitterness, frustration and fear among many of the tribal leaders who fought with the troops against the insurgents, a tableau of emotion that may color the American legacy in a region that has stood as the U.S. military's single greatest success in the war. Pragmatism, the Americans call their departure. Desertion, their erstwhile allies answer.
As the United States leaves the province, acknowledged Col. Matthew Lopez, the Marine commander here, "you're going to have individuals who are unhappy."
Sabah freely admits he is one of them.
"We stood by them, we carried out their requests, we let no one hurt them," he said in a rushed clump of words, near certificates of appreciation from the Marines and the U.S. Army that gather dust in a mother-of-pearl cabinet. "They weren't supposed to abandon us."


Laith Hammoudi (McClatchy Newspapers) reports a Baghdad sticky bombing claimed the life of 1 person and left three more injured. Reuters adds that a Ramadi sticky bombing injured Haditha Mayor Abdul Razaq Jubair and two of his body guards and an armed skirmish in Kirkuk led to one person being injured.


Turning to the US where Micah Snead tells Christin Ayers (7News), "We fought enough in the last couple of years, we shouldn't have to come home and fight for benefits." He's referring to the GI Bill which is supposed to be covering college, books and living expenses for veterans. Veterans who believed this would be the case, registered. And yet the government checks do not arrive for many. Tomas Dinges (New Jersey Star-Ledger) speaks to Iraq War veteran Dave Durga:

He has reached out to his parents for $1,400 for September's rent and another couple hundred dollars for the 12 books required for his study in political science. "You have schoolwork to focus on, and then bills pile up, and then you have to focus on that," said Durga, 24. "It becomes a frustration."
The Department of Veterans Affairs will attempt to remedy situations like Durga's by disbursing emergency payments today of up to $3,000. The money will go to nearly 25,000 veterans around the country who have not received the portion of the educational benefit that provides money for books and housing.

Emma Brown (Washington Post) adds:

As of last week, fewer than 10 percent of the 251,000 veterans who had applied for GI Bill benefits had actually received checks, forcing thousands to use savings or take out personal loans to make ends meet.
At the agency's regional office in the District, about 300 veterans waited at noon in chairs and on the floor for a chance to apply for and receive the checks, which were announced a week ago by Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki.
"I've been stressing," said Gabriel Albanes, 23, who deployed twice to Iraq as a Marine and is now a student at Northern Virginia Community College. "I gotta pay rent next month, and I have a part-time job but it's not going to cover it."

That's going to be it. The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.


mcclatchy newspapers
mohammed al dulaimy



Ehren Watada

Ehren Watada was discharged from the military yesterday. Scott Fontaine (The News Tribune) reports:

Watada, through his lawyer, declined all requests for interviews and public appearances. Kagan said his client doesn't fear retribution from the Army and made no agreements to stay silent, but after three years of national attention, he "wants to reclaim his privacy and anonymity."
"I know it will be disappointing to supporters and media representatives," Kagan wrote in an e-mail, "but he no longer wishes to be a 'story'."
Kagan added that Watada's actions and beliefs are well-known at this point, and his client has nothing to add.
Watada, a 31-year-old Hawaii native, plans to attend law school. Kagan added that his client wanted to thank his supporters and acknowledges not everyone agrees with his actions.


ehren watada
1st Lt Ehren Watada was the first officer to publicly refuse to deploy to Iraq stating that it was an illegal and immoral war. In "Anti-war activists look at other cases," Fontaine examines reaction to Ehren's victory:

"We're very happy for Ehren," said Seth Manzel, an Iraq veteran who runs the antiwar Coffee Strong café in Lakewood. "We think this is proof that people can follow their conscience and not be punished for it."
Watada became a hero for many who disagreed with the war in Iraq. Rallies and vigils near the gates of Fort Lewis to support the officer drew hundreds, including Hollywood actor Sean Penn. Protesters at other anti-war rallies over the past few years sometimes held banner-sized photos of Watada.
The nonprofit group Iraq Veterans Against the War has consistently supported Watada, and an article prominently displayed on the organization's Web page speaks of his "exemplary moral courage."


Yesterday's snapshot critiqued Free Speech Radio News' embarrassing coverage. 3 visitors e-mailing the public account are confused.

So let's walk through slowly. If Friday's Democracy Now! had included the same headline by Amy Goodman, it would have been accurate. That's because regardless of when you catch Democracy Now! (if you do), Goodman broadcasts that live in the morning (7:00 a.m. EST). Friday morning, Ehren Watada was not discharged. Friday morning at seven a.m., he was scheduled to be discharged. FSRN airs at various times but airs first on KPFA in the afternoon. It airs on KPFA at 3:30 p.m. . . . in the Bay Area. That's Pacific. EST? 6:30 p.m.

A program airing at six thirty p.m. EST? It has no excuse for saying that Ehren Watada was scheduled to be discharged that day. At 6:30 pm, "that day" is over.

I called Fort Lewis' Public Affairs office a few minutes before 4:00 pm EST because our last speaking thing on Iraq started at four p.m. That was 3:00 pm. Central, 1:00 p.m. Pacific. I was told that his papers had been processed and he was discharged.

I made the call because there was no way we could have a Friday snapshot without mentioning Ehren on the day he was due to be discharged and, due to his historic fight and the fact that we were going into the weekend, "scheduled to be discharged" wasn't going to cut it for my standards for the Iraq snapshots. Now for news standards, it certainly wasn't going to cut it. But we're not news here. Due to the failure of the press, we are reporting many things here but that's not what I set out to do or intended.

I did know that when we finished at six p.m. EST, it might be difficult to get an answer from the Public Affairs office (which would still be open due to the time change) because many news outlets might be seeking comments. I also knew I had to finish the snapshot. (All but the Ehren section was dictated prior to 4:00 pm. EST.) And didn't have a great deal of time.

So after we finished speaking, we headed to the airport. I was holding Rebecca's baby as we were walking to the plane (her husband's plane) and dictating the snapshot. There's a portion that will be picked up on Monday because a link was supposed to have been inserted but it wasn't or the link didn't work. That happens. It's no biggie. And I appreciate the three friends who type up those snapshots.

But there was no excuse for a Friday afternoon and evening radio program to state Ehren was scheduled to be discharged. You can say that in the morning. At the end of the day, you need to know what happened and, more importantly, your audience needs to know.

Last week they had plenty of time to report on a Glenn Beck party. That was stupid and that was disgraceful. And I do agree with everything Elaine wrote on that earlier this week including that those 'protestors'? They should be ashamed of themselves. This was a local story first of all. No place on any national radar. Second of all, it was a 'hometown kid makes good.' It had nothing to do with politics -- other than the politics of money -- and it was really tacky that people would show up to protest that. Whether it's Glenn Beck or Ida NeverHeardOfHer, when someone gets a hometown honor, that's really nothing to protest. That's really sad that some people feel the need to protest that. Same people who, of course, never protest Barack's continued Iraq War. Those demonstrators? All they demonstrated was bad manners.

Glenn Beck's a TV personality. The left continues to give him far more power than he has. The reason for that is their own unhappiness with the current administration which requires that they invent scary boogey men to run from instead of facing the reality of what's coming out of the White House: No change.

Glenn Beck's not the issue, Glenn Beck was never the issue. But by making him the issue, we aren't supposed to have time to notice every broken promise from Barack Obama.

It's a distraction and those participating in that so-called 'protest' showed bad manners and ignorance.

And for those who don't listen to FSRN and are lost in the illustration, NBC's Today could have said Friday morning that Ehren was scheduled to be discharged Friday and that wouldn't have been a problem. But when the evening news rolled around, had Brian Williams said Ehren was scheduled to be discharged, it would have been wrong. Ehren had been discharged.

The following community sites have updated since yesterday's morning:



Cedric's Big Mix
Tin foil super-star
1 hour ago

The Daily Jot
THIS JUST IN! GOING FOR THE ALUMINUM!
1 hour ago

Thomas Friedman is a Great Man
Barbra
19 hours ago

Mikey Likes It!
Olympic Loss
19 hours ago

Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitude
help barbra have a number 1 album 5 decades in a row
19 hours ago

SICKOFITRADLZ
Ambassador Melanne Verveer
19 hours ago

Trina's Kitchen
Pizza in the Kitchen
19 hours ago

Ruth's Report
Melanee Verveer, Barbra Streisand
19 hours ago

Oh Boy It Never Ends
Stats
19 hours ago

Like Maria Said Paz
Love Is The Answer
19 hours ago

Ann's Mega Dub
Love Is The Answer
19 hours ago

Kat's Korner (of The Common Ills)
Music and oh-the-years-weren't-kind-to-Rush
19 hours ago

The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.


ehren watada







thomas friedman is a great man






oh boy it never ends

Friday, October 02, 2009

Iraq snapshot

Tuesday, October 2, 2009.  Chaos and violence continue, the US military announces another death, Angelina Jolie urges the world not to forget Iraqi refugees, Cindy Sheehan urges the world to neither forget nor accept these continued wars, Ehren Watada historic struggle results in a victory, and more.
 
The US military announced: "CAMP VICTORY, Iraq – A Multi-National Corps-Iraq Soldier was killed today in an indirect fire attack on Camp Liberty. Release of the identity of the Soldier is being withheld pending notification of the next of kin. The name of the deceased service member will be announced through the U.S. Department of Defense Official Web site at http://www.defenselink.mil/. The announcements are made on the Web site no earlier than 24 hours after notification of the service member's primary next of kin. The incident is currently under investigation." The announcement brings to 4348 the number of US service members killed in Iraq since the start of the illegal war. Sun Yunlong (Xinhua) adds, "The term 'indirect fire' in the U.S. military statements usually refers to rocket or mortar attack." Iran's Press TV notes (two hours ago) that the US military released this statement today (not Thursday as dated) and they note 127 US service members have died in Iraq so far this year. Chelsea J. Carter (AP) also notes the announcement was made Friday and that AP's count of 238 deaths for the month of September.
 
In other violence, Sahar Issa (McClatchy Newspapers) reports a Baghdad roadside bombing which wounded four people and a Baghdad sticky bombing which wounded two people.  In addition, Issa notes an attack on a religious minority, Faraj Khairi Bek who is both a Yazidi prince and Zummar's chief of police.  His home was blown up today in Mosul.  Issa also notes an attack on a mosque in Nineveh Province which claimed the life of 1 Imam and wounded four people.
 
This morning on The Diane Rehm Show, Susan Page filled in as guest host and was joined for the second hour by Jonathan S. Landay (McClatchy Newspapers), David Loyn (BBC) and Barbara Slavin (Washington Times).

Susan Page: In Iraq this week, we had the prime minister announce a broad coalition for the elections in January, a little bit of a change in strategy on his part, Jonathan.
 
Jonathan S. Landay: Absolutely.  This is a man who led a party called the Dawa Party, which was a conservative Shi'ite party, aligned with the other Shi'ite parties in Iraq.  And what he seems to be doing, what al-Maliki seems to be doing, is trying to harness what is a very uh uh growing disastisfication, discontent with reglious parties in Iraq among many Iraqis who see the religious parties as being part and parcel of the violence that was unleased after the 2003 US interven -- invasion.  Uh, he-he calls his new party State of Law bloc, he's casting it as being uh sectarian -- non-sectarian, secular and embracing not just uh Shi'ites but also Sunnis as well as Kurds and other minorities in Iraq.  The thing though being, at this point really, it doesn't appear that there are any real major leaders from those other uh uh uh groups uh that have joined his party.  Nevertheless he-he himself went up to Kurdistan to try and bring the major Kurdish parties into his coalition.  Right now that may not be happening because there's still no agreement on what -- on the future of Kirkuk -- the oil-rich that the Kurds and the Arabs all claim.  And-and he's also facing opposition from a conservative Shi'ite bloc that has the backing of many of Iraq's Shi'ite religious leaders.
 
Susan Page: Meanwhile we heard from General Odierno who's the US commander in Iraq about troop levels.  Barbara, what did he say about when more Americans could come home?
 
Barbara Slavin: Well, he had a pretty optimistic report and one thing also is good.  Apparently, civilian casualties are down for Iraq in this month. After a pretty horrific -- rather in September compared to August when there was horrific bombings.  That seems to have stopped. At least for now, or at least it is less than it was.  So Odierno, is saying he can bring back an additional 4,000 troops by the end of the year that he hadn't expected  [C.I. note, as he said to Congress Wednesday and he declared at the Pentagon yesterday this so-called 'addtional troops' was already planned -- it was also already announced.].  There are about 124,000 troops in Iraq right now so that would still bring the US down to about 120,000. 
 
We're stopping there on Barabra and Odierno.  Where she's getting her information, I do not know.  I was at the hearing and I was even at the press conference.  We've reported what Odierno said.  I don't make a point to disagree when we do the transcripts but she's getting her information from where?  She wasn't present and she's completely heard wrong.  Did Odierno give an optimistic view to the US Congress?  That's a judgment call.  And if you're just going by the prepared statement (prepared by him and the White House) you are correct.  But if you were actually at the hearing of the House Armed Forces Committee and you heard the testimony from Odierno, you know the general did issue qualifiers.  Of course for the public to know that, it would require the press cover it.  There were very few members of the press at the hearing.  And that number thinned significantly by 30 minutes into the hearing.  I'm not calling Barbara a liar.  Nor do I believe she meant to spin Odierno's testimony.  But she does not know what he said.  And she's as uninformed on that as anyone dependant upon the press because the press did not report on Odierno's testimony. To do that, they would have been required to have been present and if I get in a really nasty mood about this topic, I may start naming the people who had bylines on 'reports' about the hearing but they weren't actually present. 
 
No offense to Barbara Slavin and, repeating, I am not accusing of her lying or attempting to shade or spin the truth.  I am stating the press reports she's relying to be informed are inaccurate.  Odierno repeatedly stressed that he did have the power to speed up . . . and he did have the power to slow down.  Reporters (reporting on the hearing) intentionally lied or just heard what they wanted to.  As someone who takes notes throughout any hearing (sometimes just to stay awake), I know what was said.  I know his qualifiers, I know when he squirmed, I know his nervous tic when he doesn't want to answer a question fully.  And anyone present for the entire hearing -- his first Congressional appearance as the top US commander in Iraq -- would know those things to.  However, most of the press corp skipped it and the few that showed thinned out by the first half-hour. (Added: You can stream the entire thing online at the committee website here.  I've called a staffer to make sure my impressions weren't me being off the wall.  No, his qualifiers were very clear.)
 
Susan Page: Although 50,000 troops still is a significant presence there. 
 
Barbara Slavin: It is, but you know, most of these people will be trainers, will be sort of working in liason capacity with Iraqis and the Iraqis are very much taking the lead now on -- on policing their own country.
 
Barbara's second remarks quoted in full?  I don't agree with them at all.  I'm not going to comment on them.  She's entitled to her opinion.  But the point prior to that, of cutting off her response, wasn't that I was disagreeing.  It was that the observations she was offering were incorrect.  They were based on the (limited) press coverage (of the first minutes of the hearing -- often due to the fact that Odierno's opening remarks were distributed to the press).  The press coverage was incorrect.  I am not going to allow that to appear here without noting it was wrong.  I could have been at home, I could be traveling (for fun), anything. Instead, I was -- Kat, Ava, Wally and I  were -- in that hearing from the start to the end.  We know what happened and we know the press didn't report it accurately. If I had to waste my time, I'm not going to further waste my time by having my already wasted time further wasted by allowing a 'recounting' of events when the summary is completely incorrect.  Repeating, I am not calling Barara a liar or stating she was attempting to deceive.  I am stating she was wrong and her errors are from the (limited) press coverage. 
She, like anyone else, has a right to expect that press coverage is accurate.  It wasn't.  Kat covered the hearing again last night, noting humorous exchanges -- did anyone but Kat report that Stephen Colbert was mentioned in the hearing?  No.  Why?  Because the (limited) press had long ago left.  The same reason that Carol Shea-Porter's questions about contractors -- see yesterday's snapshot -- didn't make the press. (And yesterday's snapshot stated it was October 1st -- correct -- and Monday -- incorrect.  That was an error when it was typed.)  For more on the hearing, Wednesday's snapshot and Kat's Wednesday post covered it last nightUPI notes that Odierno notes yesterday's press conference and notes that 50,000 by next September, according to Odierno, will result from a judgment call as that time approaches.  The spin that many in the press created is not reality.  It does do its part to ensure that an already weak peace movement doesn't grow any stronger -- which, after all, is the point.
 
Peace Mom Cindy Sheehan knows the Iraq War has not ended (despite Barack's promise to end it in 16 months and then in 10 months) and that there is an undeclared war on Pakistan and the war in Afghanistan.  Cindy (Cindy's Soapbox) writes:
 

I know that you are only fulfilling your campaign promises to increase the violence in Afghanistan and Pakistan and I notice that not a significant amount of troops have been withdrawn from Iraq. However, even with your hostile rhetoric and promises to escalate the violence, many people voted for you because they believed you were the peace candidate.

Since the election, you have betrayed the progressive base that gave you victory on many occasions already, but the cause that keeps many of us motivated is the continued carnage in the Middle East. What bothers me even more, especially, is the fact that the so-called anti-war movement has given you a nine-month free pass and thousands of people have died, including hundreds of our own troops.

Since you took office, 125 of our irreplaceable young have been killed in what you called a "dumb war" in Iraq and 223 in what I call the "other dumb war," Afghanistan. I have been waiting for a mother of one of those needlessly killed troops to demand a meeting with you to ask you: for "What Noble Cause?" her child was sacrificed.

No such mother has come forward and since your rhetoric is eerily similar to the Bush regime and you are reportedly considering strategies for Afghanistan before you condemn more than the 21,000 troops you have already condemned, I am requesting that you meet with a contingent of the true Peace Movement that will be assembling outside your house this Monday, October 5th at noon.

 
Yesterday, Nouri al-Maliki, thug of the occupation and holding the honorary title of Prime Minister, announced that he was putting together his own slate of oddballs and never chosen because this slate would allow him to be prime minister if the slate was successful in elections expected to take place in January.   Steven Lee Myers (New York Times) observes that "few" of those on Nouri's slate "are truly national leaders likely to lure major blocs of votes."  Mohammad al Dulaimy (McClatchy Newspapers) explains, "The announcement, made from a heavily guarded Baghdad hotel and broadcast live on television, ended weeks of speculation over whether Maliki's State of Law bloc would join the Iraqi National Alliance, a more Islamist faction that includes the largest Shiite party and supporters of rebel cleric Muqtada al Sadr." Alsumaria (link has video of the speech) explains, "Al Maliki pursues efforts to join 30 new political entities and parties to 40 other entities and political figures into the State of Law Coalition that gathers prominent figures mainly first deputy speaker Sheikh Khaled Al Attiye and a number of ministers including Oil Minister Hussein Al Shahristani, and ministers of Education, Health, Tourism, Labor, Immigrants, Youth and Sports as well as Parliament affairs." Jamal Hashim (Xinhua) reports on Nouri's speech which used terms such as "historic" -- offering a window into the deep pool of vanity overlooding Nouri's psyche. Gina Chon (Wall St. Journal) slaps some cold water on the fantasies, "The prime minister will face tough competition in the Shiite south. He enjoyed a surge in popularity there following a military offensive against Shiite militants in the spring of 2008. Since then, Iraqis have grown frustrated with lagging basic services, such as adequate clean water. Mr. Maliki also has been criticized for recent security lapses, including those related to the August bombings."  Ben Lando (Time magazine) offers an overview:
 
Now, with State of Law, he must go toe-to-toe with the Iraqi National Alliance (INA) which, in the shape-shifting politics of Iraq, is the current manifestation of the coalition that Maliki rode to power in 2006. To stay in charge of Iraq, Maliki must defeat his former coalition allies in what are expected to be tough elections on January 16. [. . .]   
INA is a formidable organization. Its predominant partners are the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq -- the largest Shi'ite political party now led by Ammar al-Hakim, the son of the recently departed and revered cleric Abdulaziz al-Hakim -- and the militant Moqtada al-Sadr's party, which has its pulse on the much of the country's poor and frustrated Shi'a underclass. (Read how the shoe-thrower put Maliki in a sensitive spot.)
 
Caesar Ahmed (Los Angeles Times) speaks with a variety of Iraqis on the street in Baghdad about Nouri's slate.
 
Academy Award winning actress Angelina Jolie is also the UNHCR Goodwill Ambassador.  Today, visiting Syria, she issued a call for the world not to forget the Iraqi refugees who have been forced to flee their own country for safety. The UNHCR notes:
 
Tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians have returned to their country from Syria and other nearby countries over the past year, but many more are unable or unwilling to return to a country still rocked by violence. As the Iraqi story has largely disappeared from global headlines, so has the plight of the refugees.
Jolie, returning to visit Iraqi refugees in the poorest suburbs of the Syrian capital of Damascus after a 2007 visit, said these refugees still needed vital help and support. "Most Iraqi refugees cannot return to Iraq in view of the severe trauma they experienced there, the uncertainty linked to the coming Iraqi elections, the security issues and the lack of basic services. They will, therefore, be in need of continued support from the international community."    
The acclaimed American actress, travelling with her partner Brad Pitt, was welcomed into the homes of two Iraqi families in the Jaramana district of southern Damascus. The first family, grouping seven people, fled to Syria in 2006, while the second family, members of a minority religious group, fled to Iraq in July this year after a son, Waleed,* was twice abducted and his mother, Hoda,* physically abused. The family patriarch, Fares,* had to pay US$25,000 in ransom the first time Waleed was abducted.             
The second time, both son and mother were snatched, and Fares had to find US$40,000. The two were released, but they had suffered a terrible ordeal, including torture. "I was assaulted every day for 13 days by up to 10 men," Hoda* recalled, her voice trembling. "I wanted to kill myself and the only reason I decided not to go ahead is because of my children," she added.          
On the release of Hoda and Waleed, the family fled to Syria.
 
RadarOnline offers photos of Angelina's visit to Syria. 
 
This afternoon Fort Lewis's Media Relations department announced that Ehren Watada had completed his out processing and was discharged from the US military. We're going to stay with this topic for a bit because (a) it is important and (b) it is historical.  1st Lt Watada was the first officer to publicly refuse to deploy to Iraq.  As Ann noted last night, "there are people who have no idea what a brave thing he did."  Ehren Watada was informed he would be deploying to Iraq in June 2005.  He had not given much thought to Iraq.  To prepare for the deployment, his superior advised him to study up on the war so that he could answer any questions that might come up from those serving under him.  He started researching the basics about the country itself, topography and geography and continuing through the history up to the current war.  He came across the Downing Street Memos which exposed that the 'intelligence' for the Iraq War was fixed.  He was now firmly convinced that the Iraq War was illegal and immoral.  From eager to serve in Iraq to realizing he'd be violating his oath to the Constitution, Ehren was now confronted with a decision.  He could keep his mouth shut and just do as he was told.  Or he could take a stand which would risk the wrath of the military as well as a portion of the public.
 
Ehren's mother, Carolyn Ho, has explained what happened next many times as she's spoken to raise awareness of her son's case.  WBAI's Law and Disorder shared one of her talks on their January 22, 2007 broadcast. Carolyn Ho explained it was the new year, January 2006, and her son called her.  He explained that he had something to tell her, he'd decided decided he wouldn't deploy to Iraq when the time came.  She was very upset and asked him if he understood what might result from his decision?  Ehren told her that he had no choide, he'd taken an oath to the Constitution, this was what he had to do and he was going to inform his superiors. 
 
Ehren didn't hestitate to inform his superiors.  This was in January 2006.  They at first attempted to change his mind.  He could not be budged.  So they stated they wanted to work something out.  They brainstormed together.  Ehren came up with ideas including, he could deploy to the Afghanistan War instead, he could resign (his service contract expired in December 2006).  His superiors appeared to be eager to consider every possibility; however, they were just attempting to stall.  They appear to have thought that if they put him off and put him off, when the day to deploy came, he'd just shrug his shoulders and deploy.
 
They did not know Ehren.  June 7, 2006 ("the day before his 28th birthday," Carolyn Ho likes to remind), Ehren went public with his refusal to deploy. Jake Armstrong (Pasadena Weekly) notes Ehren stated to participate in the Iraq War would be participating in war crimes.
 
In August 2006, an Article 32 hearing was held. Watada's defense called three witnesses, Francis A. Boyle of the University of Illinois' College of Law, Champagne; Denis Halliday, the former Assistant Secretary General of the UN; and retired Colonel Ann Wright. These three witnesses addressed the issue of the war, it's legality, and the responsibilities of a service member to disobey any order that they believed was unlawful. The testimony was necessary because Watada's refusing to participate in the illegal war due to the fact that he feels it is (a) illegal and (b) immoral. Many weeks and weeks later, the finding was released: the military would proceed with a court-martial.

On Monday, February 5, 2007, Watada's court-martial began. It continued on Tuesday when the prosecution argued their case. Wednesday, Watada was to take the stand in his semi-defense. Judge Toilet (John Head) presided and when the prosecution was losing, Toilet decided to flush the lost by declaring a mistrial over defense objection in his attempt to give the prosecution a do-over. Head was insisting then that a court-martial would begin against Watada in a few weeks when no court-martial could begin.

January 4, 2007, Head oversaw a pre-trial hearing. Head also oversaw a stipulation that the prosecution prepared and Watada signed. Head waived the stipulation through. Then the court-martial begins and Ehren's clearly winning. The prosecution's own military witnesses are becoming a problem for the prosecution. It's Wednesday and Watada's finally going to take the stand. Head suddenly starts insisting there's a problem with the stipulation. Watada states he has no problem with it. Well the prosecution has a problem with it and may move to a mistrial, Judge Toilet declares.

The prosecution prepared the stipulation and they're confused by Head's actions but state they're not calling for a mistrial or lodging an objection. That's on the record. Head then keeps pushing for a mistrial and the prosecution finally gets that Head is attempting to give them a do-over, at which point, they call for a mistrial.

The case has already started. Witnesses have been heard from. Double-jeopardy has attached. The defense isn't calling for a mistrial and Head rules a mistrial over defense objection and attempts to immediately schedule a new trial. Bob Chapman (Global Research) observes, "With little fanfare the Army at Fort Lewis, Wash., accepted the resignation of the 1966 Kalari High School graduate, and he will be discharged the first week in October."  With little fanfare indeed.  And to those 'lefty' sites that want to smear opposition of Barack Obama's ObamaBigBusinessCare passed off as something to do with "health care"?  I'd say before you accuse anyone of racism, you might take a look at your own damn ass -- which, Red or not, appears highly racist when you claim to be "anti-war" and yet 'forget' all damn week to note Ehren Watada. 
 
And, related, like Elaine, I was disgusted that Free Speech Radio News had time for a ceremony for Glenn Beck but not time to cover Ehren Watada.  Today they sort of cover him (link has audio and text):
 
Lt. Ehren Watada, the first US Army officer to refuse to serve in the war in Iraq, will finally be allowed to resign from the US Army today at Fort Lewis in Washington. Mark Taylor-Canfield has more from Seattle.
Spokespersons at Fort Lewis have confirmed that First Lt. Ehren Watada will be allowed to resign from the US Army.  In 2003, Lt. Watada was the first US military officer to refuse to serve in Iraq, which he claims is an illegal war. In 2007 his court marshal was declared a mistrial by a civilian judge. Watada's enlistment was supposed to be up two years ago but he has not been allowed to leave the service.
According to Watada's attorney, Kenneth Kagan, he will receive a "less than honorable discharge."  Watada took a leading role in the anti-war movement, speaking out publicly against the war, and criticizing President George W. Bush at the Veterans For Peace national convention in Seattle in 2006. Watada has been under a military imposed gag order since his original court marshal proceedings. Mark Taylor-Canfield, FSRN, Seattle.
 
Sort of?  Two hours before that aired, I'd confirmed on the phone that he'd been discharged and his paper's processed but they're broadcasting, two hours later, that he is supposed to be discharged.  People, it's one damn call.  You pick up the phone, you call public affairs at Fort Lewis and you explain what you need.  So to find people who love and people who hate Glenn Beck, FSRN can do some work.  But when they finally note this historic development, they're left with nothing really to say.  Not "will be," was.  News.  You're the ones claiming to be reporters, not me.  I rejected that years ago.  You're the ones begging for money, not me, I think it's incumbent upon you to do the work that makes someone feel money is well spent. (For those note catching the connection between the two -- both events, Ehren's historic day and that party for Beck took place in the Seattle region.  One got an actual report and one got a brief headline.  What did our 'independent' news program give us a report on?  Glenn Beck's party. Look next for FSRN to woo Suzy for audio reports or possibly Cindy Adams.)
 
TV notes. NOW on PBS explores Afghanistan which they wrongly dub "the forgotten war." Washington Week is not airing this week. Most PBS stations will be airing The National Parks: America's Best Idea, Ken Burns' latest documentary. Washington Week will return next week.  Meanwhile Bonnie Erbe will sit down with Linda Chavez, Kim Gandy, Tara Setmayer and Patricia Sosa to discuss the week's events on PBS' To The Contrary. Check local listings, on many stations, it begins airing tonight. And turning to broadcast TV, Sunday CBS' 60 Minutes offers:

The Swindler
To understand how Bernard Madoff could have done what he did, listen to so-called "mini-Madoff" Ponzi schemer Marc Dreier tell Steve Kroft in his first television interview how he scammed $400 million. | Watch Video


130 Million Tons of Waste
If coal ash is safe to spread under a golf course or be used in carpets, why are the residents of Kingston, Tenn., being told to stay out of a river where the material was spilled last December? Lesley Stahl reports. | Watch Video


The Great Migration
Scott Pelley visits Kenya, the site of the great wildebeest migration, and looks at the threats to this natural spectacle comprised of over a million animals.


60 Minutes, this Sunday, Oct. 4, at 7 p.m. ET/PT.

 
 
 

US service member announced dead from "indirect fire"

The US military announced: "CAMP VICTORY, Iraq – A Multi-National Corps-Iraq Soldier was killed today in an indirect fire attack on Camp Liberty. Release of the identity of the Soldier is being withheld pending notification of the next of kin. The name of the deceased service member will be announced through the U.S. Department of Defense Official Web site at http://www.defenselink.mil/. The announcements are made on the Web site no earlier than 24 hours after notification of the service member’s primary next of kin. The incident is currently under investigation." The announcement brings to 4348 the number of US service members killed in Iraq since the start of the illegal war. Sun Yunlong (Xinhua) adds, "The term 'indirect fire' in the U.S. military statements usually refers to rocket or mortar attack." Iran's Press TV notes (two hours ago) that the US military released this statement today (not Thursday as dated) and they note 127 US service members have died in Iraq so far this year. Chelsea J. Carter (AP) also notes the announcement was made Friday and that AP's count of 238 deaths for the month of September.

Now might be a good time to note Ross Johnson's "Students Protest U.S. Involvement in Iraq" (New University):

Thousands of people converged at the intersection of Olympic and Broadway in downtown Los Angeles to protest the American-led invasion and occupation of Iraq.
On Saturday, Oct. 27, the crowd was led up Broadway, and later Main Street, toward the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse by a Penske flatbed truck weighed down with activists. On the bed were stacks of speakers broadcasting the voices of the organizers, chanting, 'What do we want?' The crowd followed, bellowing 'Out of Iraq now!' over and over, slowly shuffling behind banners reading 'Iraq Veterans Against the War,' 'US Out of Iraq!' and 'Alto A La Guerra!'
The towering skyscrapers of downtown Los Angeles provided a stunning backdrop for a man paralyzed from the chest down from wounds he received during the Vietnam War.
He held an American flag from his wheelchair as a friend pushed him along the route, and his words echoed off the walls of City Hall, 'This is my 40th year in a wheelchair, and the same government that put me in this wheelchair is putting other young men and women in wheelchairs for a war that makes no sense.' The surrounding concrete amplified the cheers of the crowd for blocks around at his last words: 'We will create a beautiful, beautiful country someday.'

Out of Iraq Now? That was in 2007. The new motto is: "Out of Iraq Now . . . or, you know, whenever. No biggie." You can see it practiced on the shows that sell the illegal wars like Democracy Now! where you get a bunch of political closet cases who can't call out Barack Obama. Listen to little wimp-ass Davy Zirin this morning, Mr. I'm a Big Bad Radical in private all but kissing Barry O's ass on the air. Listen to Juan intro the new 'film' by Robert and grasp how tentative his wording is and how they never were at loss for words with Bush. They're all pathetic and only getting increasingly so. Amy Goodman being the worst of all.

The Iraq War hasn't ended but their interest did long ago. We should pass legislation: If you attempt to make money off a war, you have to remain focused on it. Goody certainly has played Last Journalist Standing a number of idiots mistakenly give her credit for 'covering' Iraq today when she lost interest in 2006.

Out of Iraq Now . . . or, you know, whenever. No biggie.

Two US service members dead this week. No biggie. Who the hell cares about them? You think Amy Goodman gives a damn or Naomi Klein who's so giddy over the economic crisis that she sounds like Cheney and Rumsfeld after 9-11 demanding "Wrap it up!"?

The wars aren't ending and a good reason for that goes to our Closeted 'leaders' who've always tricked and fooled. The tricksters aren't really about ending the wars. They're about using an illegal war and anything else to advance their own private agenda -- an agenda they believe they must keep private (lack of popular support) and can (what do the people matter anyway?).

Each time there's another death in Iraq, grasp that Bully Boy Bush was only one person playing the American public. He had many others eager to trick and deceive. "And," as Carole King sings in "You Still Want Her" (Touch The Sky), "that's how you get taken in."

The real story of Iraq is the greed that allowed it to start in the first place and which allows it to continue. An Iraqi correspondent for McClatchy Newspapers offers "Officials take bribes, the Government Makes Reports:"

The Iraqi Integrity Commission recently issued the results of a June 2009 poll in which it surveyed 3,500 Iraqi citizens who conducted formal business at 40 different governmental departments in Baghdad.
First of all, I will not make any comment on why the commission that is supposed to fight corruption in the country is making polls. But the results showed that 79 percent of those surveyed were forced to pay bribes and another 20 percent offered payments to officials.


Rebecca's favorite musical artist is Barbra Streisand who has a new album just out this week.

Having trouble viewing this message? Click here | Add to your address book

http://lists-columbia.sonybmgemail.com/t/4397927/4036146/317117/0/


http://lists-columbia.sonybmgemail.com/t/4397927/4036146/346127/0/

Live From The Villave Vanguard
Barbra Streisand's once in a lifetime performance at the Village Vanguard is now up on BarbraStreisand.com. The singer's intimate performance, attended by only a selected lucky few, is the the first at a night club since 1961. The Vanguard performance features a selection of songs from Love Is The Answer (Available Now) including: "Here's To Life" , "If You Go Away" , "In The Wee Small Hours Of The Morning" , "Make Someone Happy" & "Some Other Time". WATCH IT NOW!

http://lists-columbia.sonybmgemail.com/t/4397927/4036146/329246/0/





http://lists-columbia.sonybmgemail.com/t/4397927/4036146/349340/0/
Love Is The Answer - Send Us Your Reviews
Fans will be pleased to know that Barbra's 63rd album, Love Is The Answer, was released yesterday!

We're giving fans the chance to write a review -- and have it posted on BarbraStreisand.com

If you got the album, add your review by visiting the news item here and posting it as a comment.

Buy from iTunes | Deluxe
Buy from Amazon | Deluxe
Buy from Barbrastreisand.com

Read More »


Can't get enough Barbra Streisand? Visit the official pages:
http://lists-columbia.sonybmgemail.com/t/4397927/4036146/317112/0/Facebook http://lists-columbia.sonybmgemail.com/t/4397927/4036146/317113/0/Myspace http://lists-columbia.sonybmgemail.com/t/4397927/4036146/317115/0/iTunes http://lists-columbia.sonybmgemail.com/t/4397927/4036146/329248/0/Amazon http://lists-columbia.sonybmgemail.com/t/4397927/4036146/317117/0/Official Site


Kat plans to have her review of Love Is The Answer posted here on Sunday.

TV notes. NOW on PBS explores Afghanistan which they wrongly dub "the forgotten war." Washington Week is not airing this week. Most PBS stations will be airing The National Parks: America's Best Idea, Ken Burns' latest documentary. Washington Week will return next week.
Meanwhile Bonnie Erbe will sit down with Linda Chavez, Kim Gandy, Tara Setmayer and Patricia Sosa to discuss the week's events on PBS' To The Contrary. Check local listings, on many stations, it begins airing tonight. And turning to broadcast TV, Sunday CBS' 60 Minutes offers:

The Swindler
To understand how Bernard Madoff could have done what he did, listen to so-called "mini-Madoff" Ponzi schemer Marc Dreier tell Steve Kroft in his first television interview how he scammed $400 million. | Watch Video


130 Million Tons of Waste
If coal ash is safe to spread under a golf course or be used in carpets, why are the residents of Kingston, Tenn., being told to stay out of a river where the material was spilled last December? Lesley Stahl reports. | Watch Video


The Great Migration
Scott Pelley visits Kenya, the site of the great wildebeest migration, and looks at the threats to this natural spectacle comprised of over a million animals.


60 Minutes, this Sunday, Oct. 4, at 7 p.m. ET/PT.


Turning to public radio, The Diane Rehm Show begins airing on most NPR stations and streaming online at 10:00 am EST this morning. For the first hour (domestic), Diane's panelists are Naftali Bendavid (Wall St. Journal), Shailagh Murray (Washington Post) and Karen Tumulty (Time magazine). The second hour (international), the panelists are Jonathan S. Landay (McClatchy Newspapers), David Loyn (BBC) and Barbara Slavin (Washington Times).



The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.









60 minutes
cbs news
pbs
to the contrary
bonnie erbe
npr
the diane rehm show

Nouri's Coat of Many Colors

State of Law embraces 40 parties or organizations, and Mr. Maliki and his aides on Thursday invited still more to join. Those who appeared with Mr. Maliki included Shiites and Sunnis, Kurds and Christians. On the stage and in the hall, the headdresses of tribal leaders significantly outnumbered the turbans of clerics, a significant shift, given the religious and sectarian roots of Mr. Maliki's own party, Dawa.
Few of those who joined him, however, are truly national leaders likely to lure major blocs of votes. The coalition did recruit several current ministers and government officials and peeled away several politicians previously allied with Ayad Allawi, who served as interim prime minister for a year after the American invasion and occupation.

That's from Steven Lee Myers' report (New York Times)
on the rag-tag, patchwork coalition of left-overs Nouri al-Maliki announced he'd stitched together yesterday. Ned Parker and Raheem Salman (Los Angeles Times) add:


Although Maliki attracted some prominent Sunni personalities to his list, the most sought-after -- such as Sheik Ahmed abu Risha, one of the most powerful figures in the western province of Anbar, or members of the Arab nationalist Hadba slate in Nineveh province in the north -- have held out.
Among the Sunni figures joining Maliki was Sheik Ali Hatem Sulaiman, from the largest tribal group in Anbar, the former heart of Iraq's Sunni insurgency. Sulaiman, like other tribal sheiks who have sought a common understanding with Maliki, views the prime minister as representing the best of the Shiite religious parties who rose to power after 2003.

Last week, Nouri announced he would be announcing his own slate of candidates. Yesterday was the big roll out. Mohammad al Dulaimy (McClatchy Newspapers) explains, "The announcement, made from a heavily guarded Baghdad hotel and broadcast live on television, ended weeks of speculation over whether Maliki's State of Law bloc would join the Iraqi National Alliance, a more Islamist faction that includes the largest Shiite party and supporters of rebel cleric Muqtada al Sadr." Alsumaria (link has video of the speech) explains, "Al Maliki pursues efforts to join 30 new political entities and parties to 40 other entities and political figures into the State of Law Coalition that gathers prominent figures mainly first deputy speaker Sheikh Khaled Al Attiye and a number of ministers including Oil Minister Hussein Al Shahristani, and ministers of Education, Health, Tourism, Labor, Immigrants, Youth and Sports as well as Parliament affairs." Jamal Hashim (Xinhua) reports on Nouri's speech:

"Today we announce the formation of the State of Law Coalition to contest in the January 16 elections, to build a powerful, secure and independent federal state that would guarantee the people' rights and freedoms, based on justice, equality and the law," Maliki told dozens of politicians and reporters at a gathering held at the al-Rasheed Hotel.
"The birth of State of Law Coalition represents a historic turnout and a typical development in establishing a modern Iraq state based on patriotic principles, far from the policies of marginalization, discrimination and tyranny," Maliki said.
The Iraqi prime minister also called for establishing a "strong central government that has the power of making decisions, which relies on the constitution and dialogue to settle the country's problems."
"We reaffirm that sovereignty, security, foreign policy and running the country's natural wealth will be the responsibility of the central government," Maliki elaborated the coalition's view on the future of Iraq after the landmark elections due in January.

Gina Chon (Wall St. Journal) points out
, "The prime minister will face tough competition in the Shiite south. He enjoyed a surge in popularity there following a military offensive against Shiite militants in the spring of 2008. Since then, Iraqis have grown frustrated with lagging basic services, such as adequate clean water. Mr. Maliki also has been criticized for recent security lapses, including those related to the August bombings."

Title of entry's a nod to Dolly Parton's song.

The following community sites updated last night:



The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.











thomas friedman is a great man






oh boy it never ends

Thursday, October 01, 2009

I Hate The War

How much is an Iraqi life worth? Very little to nothing apparently:


U.S. Marine Sgt. Jermaine Nelson was reduced in rank to lance corporal, but will face no other punishment for his role in the slaying of four unarmed captives in Iraq five years ago.
Nelson, 28, was given the light sentence on Wednesday after he agreed to plead guilty to two counts of dereliction of duty in exchange for dismissal of a murder charge.

That's from Mark Walker's "MILITARY: Nelson gets reduction in rank for Fallujah killing" (North County Times) and Steve Liewer (San Diego Union-Tirbune) notes:

Experts in military law said this final chapter of the Fallujah case also vindicated the legal strategy that Nelson and Sgts. Jose Nazario and Ryan Weemer took. The three Marines agreed to not testify against each other.

"They lawyered up early and got good legal advice," said Gary Solis, a former military attorney from San Diego who now teaches law at Georgetown University. "It was recognized: Hang tough, because the government has very little evidence."

Did you miss that part of the Marine code? Break the law, murder people and then agree that you're above the law and will not testify against one another.

Did you miss it?

You know, of course, that three civilians in a civilian court would not have gotten away with that. The judge would have imposed punishments. A military judge didn't do so, didn't stop the little clique. So the military approved it. That is how history will record it. Four Iraqis were killed, murdered, execution style and the US 'justice system' failed. Iraqi lives, we've seen, mean nothing. We've seen that repeatedly.

Four Iraqis are dead and a so-called law professor can't address life and death but cream his shorts over how the law was circumvented. Because, after all, it's just smoke and mirrors and cool tricks, it's not like this is life and death and certainly no one important was lost, right?

A law professor to busy being amused and bemused by the circumventing of justice to take a moment and note four people died as a result of the actions or that justice just went down the toilet.

It's over, I'm done writing songs about love
There's a war going on
So I'm holding my gun with a strap and a glove
And I'm writing a song about war
And it goes
Na na na na na na na
I hate the war
Na na na na na na na
I hate the war
Na na na na na na na
I hate the war
Oh oh oh oh
-- "I Hate The War" (written by Greg Goldberg, on The Ballet's Mattachine!)

Last Thursday, ICCC's number of US troops killed in Iraq since the start of the illegal war was 4346. Tonight? 4347.

The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.






Iraq snapshot

Monday, October 1, 2009.  Chaos and violence continue, the US military announces a death, nearly 300 Iraqis were reported dead in the month of September (the actual number is higher),  a member of Congress wonders 'since we knew that we were having trouble with the contractors that were supposed to be doing the safe wiring, why was the decision made not to inspect the contractors' facilities?,' General Ray Odierno talks about the United States long-term involvement in Iraq, and more.
 
Late yesterday, the US miltary announced: "FORWARD OPERATING BASE DELTA, Iraq – A Soldier assigned to Multi-National Corps – Iraq died of a non-combat related injury Sept. 29. The Soldier's name is being withheld pending notification of next of kin. The name of the service member will be announced through the U.S. Department of Defense Official Web site at http://www.defenselink.mil/releases. The announcements are made on the Web site no earlier than 24 hours after notification of the service member's primary next of kin. The incident is currently under investigation." The name of the fallen soldier is Army Cpl Ross Vogel III. WGAL reports that Mary Wiley told them her son died in Iraq while on his third deployment and that his survivors include two sons and a wife. DoD announced today that the 27-year-old died in Kut and that Ross Vogel was assigned to the 67th Signal Battalion, 35th Signal Brigade, Fort Gordon, Ga."  Randy Key (WJBF) add, "Specialist Vogel enlisted in the Army in 2001, and has spent most of his career at Fort Gordon, with the 35th Signal Brigade, first with the Headquarters, 67th Signal Battalion, then the 518th Tactical Installation Networking Company, and a second assignment to the 67th Signal Battalion."
 
The announcement brings the number of US service members killed in the Iraq since the start of the illegal war to 4347. The month of September saw 10 announced deaths. Thus far.

Thus far. If you're scratching your head, you're late to the party. I don't believe all the food's been put away yet in the kitchen, so go in there and help yourself. Those who arrived on time are fully aware that the US military often announces deaths from month X many days after month X has ended. It was a way to keep the death count for the month a little lower while reporters were still polishing their end of the month reflection pieces. Those really don't run these days, few papers even offer their own coverage of Iraq. The US military pulled the stunt most recently at the start of August allowing many outlets to offer "ONLY 7 US TROOPS KILLED IN JULY!" headlines. After the record 'low' was trumpeted, the US military made their announcement of, oh, yeah, we had an eighth death last month. The New York Times always gets punked. They ran with 7 for July and then started applauding August's 'only' 7 (August actually had seven deaths) and acted like they hadn't (wrongly) made a big deal out of the number seven when 'reporting' on July.

The monthly toll for September may rise above 10. That noted, if the number ten sticks, it was the sixth deadliest month of the year for US service members stationed in Iraq. And, for the record, if the number was 1 we still wouldn't run with 'only 1.' There's no 'only' when someone deployed to another country dies while serving. Shame on any who imply otherwise.
 
Monthly toll on Iraqis killed?  All deaths aren't reported.  Let's focus on the few that do get reported.  September 1st through September 5th saw 29 deaths reported and 167 reported injured ("Tuesday (Sept. 1st) saw 3 people reported dead and five wounded. Wednesday saw 6 reported dead and eleven wounded. Thursday saw 14 reported dead and 129 injured. Friday saw one reported death and ten reported injured. Saturday saw 5 reported deaths and twelve reported wounded."). September 6th through September 12th saw 136 reported dead and 230 reported injured ("On Sunday, there were 24 reported deaths and 7 reported wounded, Monday 26 dead and 44 wounded, Tuesday 27 dead and 42 wounded, Wednesday 13 dead and 38 wounded, Thursday 31 dead and 75 wounded, Friday 4 dead and 7 wounded and Saturday 11 dead and 27 wounded.") September 13th through September 19th saw 61 reported dead and 114 reported injured ("Sunday saw 23 people reported dead and 24 wounded, Monday saw 9 reported dead and 19 reported injured, Tuesday saw 5 reported dead and 11 reported wounded, Wednesday saw 1 person reported dead and 4 reported injured, Thursday saw 10 reported dead and 31 reported injured, Friday saw 7 reported dead and 23 reported wounded and Saturday saw 6 people reported dead and 2 reported injured."). September 20th through September 26th saw 31 reported deaths and 21 people reported wounded ("Last Sunday 1 person was reported killed in Iraq and 6 injured. Monday and Tuesday, we're supposed to believe that no one was killed in Iraq. Reality, the press just had other things to do. Wednesday, the numbers were 7 dead and six injured. Thursday saw two people reported wounded. Friday was 16 dead and 7 wounded. Saturday saw 7 reported deaths. In all, 31 reported deaths and 21 people reported injured.")  As September wound down, Sunday saw 5 reported deaths and 17 reported injured, Monday saw 25 reported dead and 44 reported wounded, Tuesday saw 3 reported dead and 5 reported wounded, and Wednesday saw 7 reported dead and 20 reported wounded for a total in the final September week of 40 reported deaths and 86 reported wounded.  For the month? 297 reported injured and 618 reported wounded.  At least.  ICCC does a valuable job reporting on the US service member death toll.  They do a lousy job of Iraqis.  Their total is 158 deaths.  The number is 297 and they actually include more outlets -- at least in their linking -- on violence.  The 297 is all McClatchy, Reuters, some US outlets plus China's Xinhua. Our total is 297 and our total is an undercount and we're not going to pretend it's not.  But our total is much higher than ICCC.  And not only is our tally higher, so is the official tally from the Iraqi government. AFP reports that they list the total number of deaths for the month of September to be 203. Lower than our 297, higher than ICCC. While the Iraqi 'government' tries to get you focused on the Iraqi civilian tally (125 -- they're stressing it could be seen as spitting on Iraqi Security Forces), the Red Cross' Juan-Pedro Schaerer explains to Reuters of the sitaution in Iraq, "There is a lack of respect for human life. Even if security has improved a lot ... you still have dozens of people killed on a daily basis."
 
Turning to political news, Iraq has elections scheduled for January 2010.  However, with no law passed yet, "scheduled" may not be the correct term.  They 'hope,' hope to hold elections in January. Friday Alsumaria reported that Nouri has revealed he's creating his own coalition and "will announce" it in the next week. The coalition will be Dawlat al-Qanun (State of Law) and will be a mixed coalition as Nouri attempts to paint himself more secularist due to the January 2009 elections in 14 of Iraq's 18 provinces indicating that fundamentalists were not popular with the people. It is now next week.  Gina Chon (Wall St. Journal) reveals his coalition is made up over 40 parties (many of them minor) with Sunni tribal leaders in the mix. Al Jazeera quotes the self-aggrandizing al-Maliki declaring today, "The formation of this alliance makrs a historic turning point in the process of rebuilding the modern Iraqi state."  Aamer Madhani (USA Today) speaks to Iraqi MP Safoua al-Suhail who has joined his coalition and she says, "I think it says something that this list can include (Shiite) Islamists, Sunnis and a secular liberal democrat like me."  Anthony Shadid (Washington Post) notes Nouri's slate "failed to draw the Sunni support that many had expected it would.  He lost the backing of Mahmoud al-Mashhadari, the vitriolic former parliament speaker, and more importantly, Ahmed Abu Risha, whose borther led the U.S.-baked counterinsurgency in western Iraq.  Nor did he win ovre more established Sunni or securlar blocs or parties that could have delivered him broader support in Sunni provinces".  Ned Parker and Raheem Salman (Los Angeles Times) observe Nouri has "put himself in competition with fellow Shiite Muslims of his onetime political ally, the Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council." SIIC is, of course, focusing on non-sectarian issues such as the corruption of those in currently in charge.  Suadad al-Salhy, Muhanad Mohammed, Khalid al-Ansary, Mohammed Abbas, Missy Ryan and Myra MacDonald (Reuters) note that "in facing off against ISCI, Maliki will battle a well-funded and well-organised party. His group also lacks several Iraqi political heavy-hitters who have not yet joined a coalition and whose support could be crucial."  Mohammed al Dulaimy (McClatchy Newspapers) explains, "Iraqis who are more familiar with Maliki the longtime Islamist are wary of his reincarnation as a populist."  al Dulaimy quotes political analyst Haider al Musaiw stating, "Maliki has changed.  The change is a result of the failure of the Islamist parties, and (he's) bending to the people's increasing demands for the return of secular rule."  Nouri created his own slate after SIIC refused to guarantee him that, if their slate won, they would make him Prime Minister again. 
 
Yesterday, the top US commander, Gen Ray Odierno, testified to the US House Armed Services Committee.  Ranking Member Howard McKeon asked for a walk through of the Iraqi political process since their elections are different.
 
General Ray Odierno: I'll wal -- Congressman, I'll walk you through in general terms.  First, the el - by the [Iraqi] Constitution, the election is supposed to occur no later than the 31st of January. Right now, it's scheduled for the 16th of January. Again, pending the passing of the election law. Once the election is completed, they take 45 days to certify the results of the election. And so what happens is we'll have hundreds of international observers -- maybe thousands, there's going to be quite a few international observers -- as well as the Iraqi High Electoral Commission will certify the results, they will take all complaints and then they will deem the elections to be credible, legitimate or not.  That takes forty-five days.  Once that happens, you then have thirty days to begin the formation of seating the Council of Representatives. You then have another thirty days to then select the leadership, the presidency, and then you have another time period to select the prime minister and then the Speaker [of Parliament]. So within that time period, we expect that it will take from January to June or so, maybe July, to seat the new government.  In 2005, following the elections, the government -- the elections were in December and the government was seated in May of 2005 [C.I. note, he means May of 2006]. This is the Parliamentary system of government and it just takes time for them to do this.  So it's -- there is timelines on it, they will follow those timelines strictly, but it will take time to seat that government.
 
 
That was from yesterday's hearing.  We'll drop back to it for an exchange that took place at the end of the hearing.
 
US House Rep Carol Shea-Porter: I wanted to talk to you about a conversation I had with General [David] Petraeus earlier this year when I was talking about the electrocution deaths of some of our soldiers.  And I was told there was Operation Task Force Safe and that they were going to be doing the investigation. And I believe that the investigation was supposed to end right about now.  But again comes some horrible news about a former American military man who came as a contractor to Iraq, Mr. [Adam] Hermanson, he was recently electrocuted.  So I had a couple of questions for you, General --
 
Gen Ray Odierno: Sure.
 
US House Rep Carol Shea-Porter: First of all, was his facility inspected or were you only inspecting the facilities that soldiers occupied?
 
Gen Ray Odierno: Yeah -- it was not inspected.  Uh, what happens is -- as a contractor -- it's the responsibility of the contractor to ensure they have adequate facilities so we were not inspecting those facilities. However, since that incident, we have sent Task Force Safe over to first outline to all the contractors what's expected of them in terms of proper safety requirements and-and we've also offered them any assistance that they might need, with Task Force Safe, to go look at all of their facilities to ensure that they're in line with what we believe to be safe -- safe structures.
 
US House Rep Carol Shea-Porter: Okay, since we knew that we were having trouble with the contractors that were supposed to be doing the safe wiring, why was the decision made not to inspect the contractors' facilities?'
 
General Ray Odierno: Yeah, I'm not sure we made a conscious decision not to inspect them.  I think what we focused on was, uh, the Department of Defense personnel uh and uh I think as we continue to expand this, um, we will look -- but there are some contractual issues that we have to work through so we asked the lawyers to take a look at this to see what we can and can't do because of the fact that they are contractors.  So we are working our way through this now. This obviously highlighted a problem that we all didn't understand at the time and so we continue to work it.  And what I'm telling you is we're working this problem now but we have to go through some legal reviews and other things.  We have offered some initial assistance just to make sure we don't have any repeated offenses in that specific contractor but there are many other contractors that have facilities that in some cases aren't even under Department of Defense and I don't even remember but I think this one wasn't under Department of Defense either. I think it was under a Department of State contract as well so that throws in a whole nother issue about how we do this.  But we're working through this because we want to get rid of the bureaucracy so we save the lives of the people who are going there to work.  And that's important to us.
 
US House Rep Carol Shea-Porter: Well these men and women serve this country as well. And I really don't understand it because I know that many of them had access to the medical care that the military was providing so clearly there was some crossing over there if they felt comfortable not even reimubrsing, as you recall, I'm sure.  So I just can't understand what happened there.  Were there any other services provided for the people in those buildings?  
 
General Ray Odierno:  I'll have to -- I'll have to get back with you.
 
US House Rep Carol Shea-Porter: Okay. If you could do that, I would appreciate that.
 
General Ray Odierno: I will.
 
US House Rep Carol Shea-Porter: I have one last question.  Can you comment on why the Department of Defense has declined to investigate the apparent electrocution of the American Department of Defense contractor?
 
Gen Ray Odierno: Again, I have to -- I have to go ahead and take a look at that and see exactly what happened, okay?  I'll get you an answer back on that.
 
US House Rep Carol Shea-Porter: I would appreciate that, General, because I feel very certain that when that family sent their loved one over to serve this country, they expected that we would do what we could to protect all of them --
 
Gen Ray Odierno: Sure  
 
US House Rep Carol Shea-Porter:  -- whether they were in uniform or whether they were serving as civilians.
 
 
For background on Adam Hermason, we'll drop back to the September 9th snapshot: "Kimberly Hefling (AP) reports that State Dept contractor (Triple Canopy) Adam Hermanson is dead at the age of 25 from 'showering in Baghdad'.  Janine Hermanson states her husband died September 1st and that she was told it was from electrocution." Jermey Scahill (writing at The Nation) reported:
 
Hermanson's family suspects that Adam may have died as a result of faulty electrical wiring. And they have good reason to think that--at least sixteen US soldiers and two contractors have died from electrocution. The Pentagon's largest contractor in Iraq, KBR (a former Halliburton subsidiary), has for months been at the center of a Congressional investigation into the electrocution deaths because the company has the massive LOGCAP contract and is responsible for almost all of the electrical wiring in US-run facilities in Iraq. The eighteen soldiers and contractors died as a result of KBR's "shoddy work," according to Senator Frank Lautenberg.
 
 
Janine Hermanson: I just don't understand.  It's not like he was killed by a bullet or killed by a roadside bomb. He was taking a shower.
 
Scott Schaffer: A wife asking questions about the death of her husband in Iraq.
 
Marisa Burke: His accident that had nothing to do with combat and why this widow now wants the government to investigate.  It's our top story on Newswatch 16 at 6:00.  Good evening everyone, I'm Marisa Burke.
 
Scott Schaffer: And I'm Scott Schaffer.  It is a Newswatch 16 exclusive.  A woman in Northumberland County is mourning her husband's death earlier this month in Iraq. He was electrocuted and she says it's not the first time it's happened to contractors working overseas. Newswatch's Jim Hamill, live tonight in our central Pennsylvania newsroom with a story you'll see only on 16.  Jim?
 
Jim Hamill: Scott, Adam Hermanson was doing what many of us do every day when he died: Taking a shower.  But Hermanson was far from home working as a security contractor in Baghdad's Green Zone. Now his wife and her family want to know who is responsible for his untimely death.
 
Janine Hermanson: I'm going to keep fighting for him.  He fought for me and now it's my turn to fight for him.
 
Jim Hamill: These days Janine Hermanson lives with her parents near Muncy.  Her late husband's belongings sit [covered from the elements] on the back proch. Earlier this month Adam Hermanson died while working as a security examiner in Iraq.  The military medical  examiner told Janine it appears Adam was electrocuted in the shower.
 
Janine Hermanson: It's been a month now and they still don't know who had the contract or contracts on his facility.
 
Jim Hamill: Janine says the couple planned to buy a home in the Muncy area when Adam finished working for the firm Triple Canopy. Now she spends hours every day trying to find out what went wrong? Her father says Adam did not deserve to die like this.
 
John Sivak: Our poor daughter.  No husband.  25-years-old.  This is insanity.
 
Jim Hamill: Janine showed us pictures of Adam.  Both served in the Air Force, it's where they met.  Following his death, Janine tells us she isn't getting straight answers from company officials or military officials or not only that. But Janine has learned Adam's case would make the 19th electrocution death in Iraq since 2003.  That includes service members and contractors.  Senator Bob Casey told us in a phone interview he's been working on this issue since early 2008 and is filing an amendment that would require inspections on any contract work paid for by tax payers.
 
Senator Bob Casey: It's disturbing and troubling to me that we have to file an amendment like this.  This should already be part of what the army does anyway.
 
Jim Hamill: As for Janine, she doesn't plan on giving up on her quest for answers.
 
Janine Hermanson: I'm going to make sure that I find out who's responsible and make this stop. I'm tired of people not talking to me.  You know, I have every right to know what happened to my husband.
 
Jim Hamill: Now Senator Casey says that amendment could take months to pass. The State Dept is investigating. And Triple Canopy, the company Adam Hermanson was working for, says it cannot comment until an investigation is complete. Jim Hamill, Newswatch 16, live in the central Pennsylvania newsroom.
 
 
Yesterday, Brett R. Crossley (Daily Item) noted Adam Hermanson had deployed to Iraq three times while serving in the Air Force as well as one tour in Uzbekistan. His obituary notes his motto was: "Live on day at a time, but to the fullest."
 
We covered Wednesday's hearing in yesterday's snapshot and Kat covered it last night.  There are a few other exchanges I'd like to highlight and hopefully we can note at least one more tomorrow. Gen Ray Odierno spoke today at a Pentagon briefing and declared, "I'm not sure we will ever see anyone declare victory in Iraq because, first off, I'm not sure we'll know for ten years or five years."  He declared that he expected the number of US troops in Iraq not to dip below 120,000 before the end of 2009.  In reply to a question from Luiz Martinez (ABC News), Odierno confirmed what the press appeared to miss yesterday, the October draw-down "was one that was planned."  This was not a new draw-down.  Responding to the Voice of America's Al Pessin, Odierno replied, "I think the help I'm describing is that within the context of the strategic framework agreement, that it covers many different areas, from education, technological, security.  And so it has to [be] about providing long-term assistance for developing systems.  For example, from the military side.  Also developing economic capacity, developing educational capacity, medical capacity -- all of those things.  And I think, as we do that, that helps to build their institutions.  So that's what I see happening beyond 2011."  Beyond 2011, pay attention, Odierno just listed things the US will be doing for Iraq including on "the military side."  The earlier quote, "I'm not sure we will ever see anyone declare victory in Iraq because, first off, I'm not sure we'll know for ten years or five years"? Odierno said after it, "And that's why I tell that the engagement after 2011 is as simportant as our continued engagements prior to 2011.  Again, I don't mean military engagement necessarily." He's referring back to that  list of engagments of which military is one.   "I mean," he continued, "engagement across the spectrum of our government, in order to help them continue to build into a stable institution."
 
 
 
 
Turning to some of today's reported violence . . .
 
Bombings?
 
Sahar Issa (McClatchy Newspapers) reports a Baghdad roadside bombing which wounded six people (three were police officers), a rocket attack near Baghdad International Airport and a Mosul roadside bombing. Reuters notes a Falluja car bombing claimed 1 life and left another person injured.
 
Shootings and arrests?
 
Sahar Issa (McClatchy Newspapers) reports police shot 1 suspect in Mosul. Reuters states the man was suspected of kidnapping and he was shot dead in a "sting."  If accurate, that would mean the person who could have led them to the hostage is now dead.  Iraqi Justice, will be right back.  Reuters notes that, in Baghad, Khalid Masur Ismail was arrested "alleged financer of the Shi'ite militia group Kata'bi Hezbollah".
 
Corpses?
 
Sahar Issa (McClatchy Newspapers) reports 1 corpse discovered with gun "shots to the head".
 
In legal news, Avery Fellow (Courthouse News Service) reports US District Judge Ricardo Urbina has ruled US citizen Shawqi Ahmad Omar can be turned over to the Iraqi custody.  Emma Schwartz (US News & World Reports) reported last year, "Born to Jordanian parents in Kuwait, Omar was once a member of the Minnesota National Guard. In 2004, however, he was captured during a military raid on his Baghdad home, where the government alleges he was harboring an Iraqi insurgent and four Jordanian fighters. The military alleges Omar ran a kidnapping ring targeting foreigners and that he was close to the late insurgent leader Abu Musab Zarqawi. Indeed, Omar was even charged in a Jordanian indictment along with Zarqawi in an alleged chemical plot. Omar says he is innocent and came to Iraq to look for reconstruction work. The United States says it wants Omar to face justice in the Iraqi system, but a federal appeals court held that he could not immediately be transferred to the Iraqis without further review." 
 
At Make Them Accountable, Caro asks if everyone remembers when Barack Obama 'had to' be the nominee "because he'd bring transparency to the political process in Washington?" She then goes on to highlight Brent Budowsky (The Hill) wondering if there's a "secret deal" between Barack and the insurance companies.  Meanwhile David Finkel's The Good Soldiers came out earlier this month.  Daniel Okrent examines the release in "'The Good Soldiers' - Book review" (Fortune):

Let me be direct. "The Good Soldiers" by David Finkel (Sarah Crichton Books/FSG) is the most honest, most painful, and most brilliantly rendered account of modern war I've ever read. I got no exercise at all the day I gulped down its 284 riveting pages.
Early in 2007, Finkel, a Washington Post reporter, embedded himself with the Second Battalion, 16th Infantry Regiment of the Fourth Infantry Brigade Combat Team, First Infantry Division -- colloquially, the 2-16. Its 800 men and women were among the troops who were meant to stabilize Iraq. They were a wave in the surge.
 
Meanwhile Christine Dempsey (Hartford Courant) reports on Iraq Veterans Against the War's Jeff Bartos who was among the approximately 200 demonstrators who were arrested at the G20 summit. Yesterday Bartos had the charges dropped in an agreement that will find him doing community service. He tells Dempsey, "I'm pretty satisfied with it. A, it lets me do something that I do anyway, which is nonprofit work. B, it clears my name of any charges. And C, I don't have to go back to Pittsburgh."
 
With Aimee Allison, David Solnit authored the seminal Army Of None -- a must read and, sadly, one of the few books of this era you can say that about. (It's a wonderful book.) David Solnit notes an action taking place later this month:

Here are five things you can do to make the October 24th Global Climate Action Day rock the Bay.   

It's shaping up to be amazing-- bikes, surfers, localized BART actions and a spoken word/poets/writers read out. But we really need your help and the world really needs the US climate justice movement to turn the "street heat" way up! 


1) Email your groups, networks and friends. See email below-- add a personal/organizational note.   

2) Get out postcards and put up posters. We have lots of cool postcards and posters by the end of the week. Get postcards at the Global Exchange office or at any Mob. for Climate Justice West/Oct 24th Meet or call David 510 967-7377. 

3) Attend a mobilizing meeting. The schedule of open planning meetings is below and we need YOU!
              
4) Plan to participate. Can you take on doing Public Education/Action at your BART Station/transit hub? Sign up to be one of 350 bikers or surfers (BYOB)? Can you volunteer on the day of to take on one of many needed tasks--come to a meeting or send an email to     

5) Form a climate action affinity group with 5-25 of your friends, neighbors, folks from you organization or union, etc to participate in Oct 24 together, and plan to participate in the Nov 30 Global Day of Nonviolent Climate Justice Civil Disobedience and Protest. Sign up online at:                

BeyondTalk.net 


BAY AREA OCT 24 MEET SCHEDULE              



Thursday, October 1 6pm outreach, 7pm general

Global Exchange 2017 Mission St. at 16th(16th St BART), 2nd Floor, SF        



Tuesday October 6 6:30-8:30                

2211 Mission St Apt C., San Francisco     

near SE corner of Mission and 18th, towards 19th (16th St BART)    



Wednesday October 14 6:30

Global Exchange 2017 Mission St. at 16th(16th St BART), 2nd Floor, SF    



Wednesday October 21 6:30 

Global Exchange 2017 Mission St. at 16th(16th St BART), 2nd Floor, SF            

Tuesday October 27 Debrief/November 30/Next Steps

Global Exchange 2017 Mission St. at 16th(16th St BART), 2nd Floor, SF