Saturday, September 20, 2025

Gavin Newsom needs to sue Bill Essayli for making a frivolous and defamatory charge

Anchor baby Bill Essayli is in the news.  No, he's not being deported.  Nor are his parents.  When you sell your soul to the devil known as Chump, he doesn't deport you or your parents -- especially when you're ready to break the law for him.  Ty Roush (FORBES) reports:


Bill Essayli, the acting U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California, on Saturday said he referred Gov. Gavin Newsom to the Secret Service for a “full threat assessment,” after Newsom wrote on social media a jab targeting Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. 

“We have zero tolerance for direct or implicit threats against government officials,” Essayli wrote on X, adding he “referred this matter” to the Secret Service and requested a “full threat assessment,” though it’s not immediately clear what the assessment would entail.

Essayli responded to an earlier social media post from Newsom, who wrote, “Kristi Noem is going to have a bad day today,” before signing a series of bills protecting California’s immigrant population, including a ban on face coverings for federal agents and a requirement for officers to identify themselves.


A motion needs to be made for Essayli to be disbarred. 


He clearly is not qualified to hold public office (which we'll get back to) and he is clearly not qualified to practice the law.  

There is no threat -- direct or implicit -- in Gavin's Tweet.


I need to do backstory.  I've known Gavin for years and I've noted that here before.  Following the 2024 election, Gavin began podcasting.  I broke with him over that -- over the transphobia.  He's on his own.  If he runs for the Democratic Party's presidential slot, I will not campaign for him and I will not vote for him in the primary.  If he gets the nomination, I will campaign for him.  And vote for him.  And I will campaign and vote for whomever the nominee is.

But my last interaction with Gavin regarded that former hairdo which was ridiculous. I have not spoken to him in months and don't plan to.


From time to time, he's noted in a video I repost to this site.  Other than that, I haven't written about him since the break.


So this is not me sticking up for a friend.

This is me sticking up for the law and sticking up for responsive government.

 Bill Essayli is not qualified for the job he's 'holding.'  Again, we'll get to it.


There have been two or three attempts on Donald Chump's life in the last two years.  How is helping Chump or the Secret Service from Essayli to being making these frivolous charges that distract from the Secret Service's main duty?


Should he be fired?  I believe he has been.  But before we get to that, let's note how he's never really been up to the job to begin with.  From WIKIPEDIA:


The Los Angeles Times reported that Essayli struggled to secure convictions at grand juries for charges he brought against protestors during the June 2025 Los Angeles protests. By July 23, federal prosecutors brought 38 felony cases against protestors but secured only seven indictments, with many being dismissed or reduced to misdemeanor charges. Three federal law enforcement officers reported to the Times that they overheard a speakerphone conversation in the vicinity of the grand jury room in which Essayli screamed at a prosecutor to ignore the department's Justice Manual and instead to secure indictments as directed by Pam Bondi. The reporting said Essayli's low number of indictments raised concerns among legal experts over the strength of the cases he was filing.[16]

Now let's deal with 'firing.'  He's no longer the practicing attorney general overseeing California.  Pam Bondi named him that -- without Congressional approval -- on April 1st.  Sunday will be 173 days since April 1st.


Do we get the problem or do I need to do a slow walk through?  Think Alina Haba, if you're confused. 


Here's what the law in question says, per the US Justice Dept:


28 U.S. Code § 546

(c) A person appointed as United States attorney under this section may serve until the earlier of—

(1)
the qualification of a United States attorney for such district appointed by the President under section 541 of this title; or

(2)
the expiration of 120 days after appointment by the Attorney General under this section.


Get it?  His 'term' has expired.  Sunday will be 53 days after his term expired.  As a California tax payer and a US tax payer, I want him to pay for every day after 120 that he has (mis)used office space.  His term has expired.  We should not be paying for his office space of his 'on the job' transportation (his job is over).  


He has refused to follow laws and regulations which is why the cases he's brought have not resulted in convictions.  He has tossed aside the laws and regulations to serve at the whims of Bimbo Bondi.    That doesn't cut it.  And, again, he should be disbarred.  

Right now what needs to happen is Gavin Newsom needs to bring a lawsuit against him.  That way, when it moves to discovery, we can find out whether it's just  Essayli that's an idiot who doesn't understand the law and that's why he filed this frivolous claim against Gavin or whether Pam Bondi ordered  Essayli  to waste all of our time (and tax dollars and divert the attention of the Secret Service's resources to a non-issue).  

This is important all on its own.  But it also important in light of what's just emerged today.  Rebecca's covered that tonight with "corruption is always around chump."  Here's Ben covering the issue for MEIDASTOUCH NEWS. 

 

 

Maya Yang and Robert Mackey (GUARDIAN) explain:


The FBI reportedly recorded Donald Trump’s border czar Tom Homan accepting $50,000 in cash from undercover agents who were posing as business contractors last year.

A new report from MSNBC on Saturday reveals that the agents recorded Homan, six weeks before the 2024 election, allegedly promising to assist in securing government contracts across the border security industry during Trump’s second term.

Six sources familiar with the matter told MSNBC that the FBI and justice department – then run by Joe Biden’s administration – had intended to hold off and assess whether Homan would follow through on his alleged promises after he was appointed as Trump’s border czar. However, the investigation stalled after Trump took office, and in recent weeks, officials appointed by Trump decided to close the case, according to MSNBC.

[. . .]

Homan was captured on video accepting $50,000 in cash at a meeting spot in Texas on 20 September 2024, according to an internal summary of the case reviewed by MSNBC and sources who spoke to the outlet.

Four sources familiar with the matter told MSNBC that multiple federal officials believed they had a solid criminal case against Homan for conspiracy to commit bribery. However, since Homan was not a public official at the time he accepted the money and Trump had not yet become president, his actions did not meet the criteria for a standard bribery charge.

Officials eventually decided to continue monitoring Homan once he joined Trump’s second presidential administration. MSNBC reports that officials had been looking at four potential criminal charges including conspiracy, bribery and two kinds of fraud, before Trump’s new justice department shut down the investigation.


Pam Bimbo Bondi and Ka$h Patel need to explain to the American people how dropping the case was "justice."  Because what it looks like is they weren't interested in justice, they were just scratching one another's backs and practicing The Laws Are For Thee Not For Me. 

Now I wanted to cover other things as well but Isaiah's already done a comic on this corruption and I want to get it up here.  It'll be up one hour after this posts.


The following sites updated:


 

Diana Ross Remember Me Live At Caesars Palace1979 HQ

Diana Ross & Marvin Gaye-My Mistake (Was To Love You)

Chrissie Hynde - Dark Sunglasses

Russian activist Garry Kasparov warns Trump’s media crackdown echoes Put...

Blondie - Maria (Official Music Video)

🚨HIDDEN CAMERA Catches Trump Border Czar in MAJOR BRIBE?!!!

Patti LaBelle - If You Don't Know By Now

[His] DISLIKE OF DIVERSITY, AND LEGAL IMMIGRATION FROM BLACK COUNTRI...

Cher - The Music's No Good Without You (Royal Variety Performance, 11/28...

Trump has DISASTER SATURDAY as as CATASTROPHIC NEWS Hits

You Got A Friend- Diana Ross, Whitney Houston - 1992-

This is What Proves Trump’s Dementia: Psychologist | The Daily Beast Pod...

Sarah McLachlan - Wilderness (Official Visualizer)

Trump COVER UP gets QUICKLY EXPOSED at OFF THE RAILs Hearing

P.P. Arnold | 2025 Live Session - First Cut Is The Deepest, Angel Of The...

I've Got Nothing For Candace Owens...

Sade - No Ordinary Love (Live 2011)

Singer Sade inspires new #Sadegirl style

Sade - Your Love Is King (Live Aid 1985)

Chrissie Hynde - 'Me & Mrs Jones with k.d. lang' (Official Visualiser)

RAYE - WHERE IS MY HUSBAND! (Official Music Video)

Eric Swalwell Warns FCC Chairman: SAVE YOUR DOCUMENTS – YOU’RE GONNA NEE...

Martha Wainwright: Save the Country | The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fa...

[The Demagogue]'s Supporters Explode Over Free Speech

Diana Ross - I Just Called To Say I Love You (Live at the 57th Academy A...

Kimmel suspension and self-censorship set dangerous precedent, FCC commi...

Alicia Keys - If I Ain't Got You (Sessions at AOL)

Trump Faces BACKLASH After Jimmy Kimmel Cancellation

Aretha Franklin - Don't Play That Song (LIVE)

Rep. Stansbury: Week in Review

Dione Warwick - Walk On By, I Say A Little Prayer, Do You Know The Way T...

Oversight Dem: Epstein plea deal ‘smells to high heaven’

Annie Lennox - "Why? - For Gaza" Live - Together For Palestine

First They Came For The Comedians...

Carole King - It's Too Late (Live at Montreux, 1973)

Maga Wants Us CENSORED While They Do THIS Crap

Diana Ross and The Supremes - Mother Dear [Dean Martin Special - 1965]

All 9 Justices against MAGA censorship — if ABC defends Kimmel: 1st Am. ...

Sonny and Cher - It's gonna rain

Kelly Morrison Reads Letter From More Than 20 Epstein Survivors On The H...

EPSTEIN ETC.

MAGAS ASK FOR UNITY BUT REALLY WANT CAPITULATION!

The Venom They Want Sanitized: His Own Shocking Rhetoric Unmasked

Trump Is CANCELING EVERYTHING And He WON’T Stop Here

photos from the edge 19 - berkeley's student and working class history

photos from the edge 19 - berkeley's student and working class history
Is this email not displaying correctly?
View it in your browser.
photos from the edge 19
BERKELEY'S STUDENT AND WORKING CLASS HISTORY
By David Bacon
https://davidbaconrealitycheck.blogspot.com/2025/09/photos-from-edge-19-berkeleys-student.html

Berkeley's famous leftwing politics was a product of the civil rights and student movements of the 1960s, and students left the local high school campus to join the thousands in San Francisco protesting racism in hiring at the Sheraton Palace Hotel, and later the auto dealerships on Cadillac Row.  When student leader Tracy Sims was suspended on their return, the students struck the school to win her reinstatement.  Radical photographer Paul Richards took a famous photograph of Sims in a voter registration demonstration, one of the many causes she championed.  

That protest tradition continued into the 1990s, when students blew out of class at Berkeley High to fight Proposition 187, which would have made education and health care illegal for undocumented immigrants.  That walkout was one of many immigrant rights demonstrations that followed in the years since.

But Berkeley also has a working class history that is much less discussed.  In the years after World War 2 it was an industrial city, with factories along the edge of the bay.  After the wreckage of deindustrialization of the 1980s and 90s, the biggest one left was the huge Pacific Steel foundry on Second Street.  As long as it was up and running, the workers there were militant strikers for better contracts, and supporters of the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa.  In the foundry's final years they fought the plant's impending closure, and marched against a "silent" immigration raid in which over 200 workers lost their jobs.  Today Pacific Steel is an empty shell covered in graffiti, waiting for a developer with deep enough pockets to clean up the contaminated soil beneath it and build condos or biotech labs.

Meanwhile, the city's working class protests surrounded what became its largest employer, the University of California.  Many bitter strikes swept through the campus, finally winning union rights and contracts over the years.  The same working class upsurge brought fast food workers into marches down Bancroft Way, part of the national movement for $15 an hour and a union.  When the pandemic hit, the workers of the city, especially immigrants and workers of color, made the coffee, dumped the garbage bins, and did the essential tasks that made life possible for everyone else.

Berkeley's activist students and workers are the real reason why the city's progressive politics became well known.  Their history today is celebrated in the poetry of Rafael Jesus Gonzalez, founder of the Mexican and Chicano Studies program at Laney College and the city's first poet laureate.  In Lompoc Federal Prison for trying to block a test of the MX Missile at Vandenberg Airforce Base, he wrote (https://marshhawkpress.org/rafael-jesus-gonzalez-the-gasp/):

I am here for the unfinished song,
the uncompleted dance,
the healing,
the dreadful fakes of love.
      I am here for life
             & I will not go away.

This history will be celebrated in an exhibit, "Berkeley's Latino Community" organized by the Berkeley Historical Society and Museum, starting September 21 at 2pm, at 1931 Center Street.  Some of the following photographs are part of the exhibit.






Mexican and Chicano students lead a blowout at Berkeley High School in protest of Proposition 187, which would have prevented undocumented students from going to school and their families from receiving healthcare.  Blowing out of classes is a form of protest with a long history at the school.




Before a meeting of the Berkeley City Council activists and public officials protest efforts to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) and Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) for immigrants.




Rafael Jesus Gonzalez, Berkeley Poet Laureate.




Antoniio Junio, a journeyman molder at Macauley Foundry, learned his trade at the Subic Bay Naval Base in  the Philippines.






Workers at Pacific Steel go on strike to win a better union contract.










A protest at Pacific Steel against the threatened closure of the foundry, which led to the loss of hundreds of union jobs, most of which were held by Latino and Black workers.  Ignacio Dela Fuente, leader of the Molders Union, and Calvin King, chief union steward at the plant, led the protests.












Workers from Pacific Steel march from City Hall to the foundry on Second Street, protesting the firing of hundreds of workers because of their immigration status.  Then-council member Jesse Arreguin was one of many public officials who spoke at the workers' rally at city hall.  Metzli Blanco Castaño, daughter of a fired worker, spoke in front of the plant.




Incarnacion "Chon" Rivera drove a truck picking up recycled trash for the Ecology Center during the coronavirus crisis, an "essential" job.




Martin ran the espresso machine in the first months of the pandemic, when there were no masks, and he made one out of a paper towel.




Latino workers laying asphalt for new paving on Jefferson Street.




A Mexican worker sets tiles in the yard of a Berkeley house.






Fast food workers march down Bancroft Way to protest discrimination against Latinos and demanding better wages.








A march at the University of California to protest injustice against Latino and other blue collar campus workers.














Day laborer Fidel Antonio negotiates with a local gardener on Hearst Street, where many workers wait for jobs.  He and other day laborers eat lunch at the Multicultural Instiute, before he goes back to his one-room home.

 


IN CAMPS, UNDER TREES AND EVICTED

Farmworkers and people living close to the line in Northern California
 
An exhibition of photographs by David Bacon
 
September 13 - December 15


Peter J. Shields Library, UC Davis
First Floor
100 North West Quad, Davis, CA 95616
 
Shield Library Parking: UCD Parking Lot 10
 

EN CAMPAMENTOS, BAJO LOS ÁRBOLES Y DESALOJADOS

Trabajadores agrícolas y personas que viven cerca de la línea en el norte de California

Una exposición de fotografías de David Bacon

13 de septiembre - 15 de diciembre


Biblioteca Peter J. Shields, UC Davis
Primer piso
100 North West Quad, Davis, CA 95616

Estacionamiento de la Biblioteca Shield: Estacionamiento UCD Lote 10

 



"The Military Response to Sanctuary Cities and Immigrants' Right to Work
Letters and Politics:  Mitch Jeserich interviews David Bacon:
KPFA, June 10, 2025
https://kpfa.org/episode/letters-and-politics-june-10-2025/

 



Immigrant Workers and the Recent History of Immigration Raids
A presentation by David Bacon at the UCLA Latin American Institute, with photographs and transcript.
3/11/25

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FlsyWTBWso
 

David Bacon @photos4justice on the daily lives and ongoing struggles (both personal and political) of farmworkers - interview on Against the Grain with C.S. Soong
 

BOOKS - LIBROS

More Than a Wall / Mas que un muro
El Colegio de la Frontera Norte
https://david-bacon-photography.square.site/product/more-than-a-wall-mas-que-un-muro/1?cp=true&sa=true&sbp=false&q=false

 
In the Fields of the North / En los campos del norte
University of California Press / Colegio de la Frontera Norte

ucpress.edu/9780520296077
En Mexico:  https://www.colef.mx

The Right to Stay Home:  How US Policy Drives Mexican Migration  (Beacon Press, 2013)
http://www.beacon.org/productdetails.cfm?PC=2328

El Derecho a Quedarse en Casa  (Critica - Planeta de Libros)
http://www.planetadelibros.com.mx/el-derecho-a-quedarse-en-casa-libro-205607.html

Illegal People -- How Globalization Creates Migration and Criminalizes Immigrants  (Beacon Press, 2008)
Recipient: C.L.R. James Award, best book of 2007-2008

http://www.beacon.org/Illegal-People-P780.aspx

Communities Without Borders (Cornell University/ILR Press, 2006)
https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9780801473074/communities-without-borders/#bookTabs=1

The Children of NAFTA, Labor Wars on the U.S./Mexico Border (University of California, 2004)
https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520244726/the-children-of-nafta

Hijos de Libre Comercio (El Viejo Topo)
http://www.tienda.elviejotopo.com/prestashop/capitalismo/1080-hijos-del-libre-comercio-deslocalizaciones-y-precariedad-9788496356368.html



WORK AND SOCIAL JUSTICE:
The David Bacon Archive exhibition at Stanford Libraries

https://exhibits.stanford.edu/bacon/browse
For a catalog: (https://web.stanford.edu/dept/spec_coll/NonVendorPubOrderform2017.pdf)

 

THE REALITY CHECK - David Bacon blog
http://davidbaconrealitycheck.blogspot.com

For more articles and images, see  http://dbacon.igc.org and
https://www.flickr.com/photos/56646659@N05/albums
 
 
BROOKE ANDERSON PODCAST #8
�� LISTEN: https://linktr.ee/thatshowthelightgetsinpodcast (or anywhere you get your podcasts)
 

MAS QUE UN MURO
Cinco Entrivistas sobre la exposicion en el Museo Nacional de las Culturas del Mundo, CDMX:


Part 1:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6eix0HEStpc
Part 2:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FO4IIBPs06U
Part 3:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHtY-fgtsjs
Part 4:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xm_MNrEX2Mw
Part 5:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpwSuBbgAQs

 


Pacific Media Workers Guild, CWA Local 39521, adopted a resolution supporting the Labor Call for a Ceasefire in Gaza:  https://mediaworkers.org/guild-joins-calls-for-immediate-ceasefire-in-gaza/

WHEN WE SPOKE OUT AGAINST WAR
Unearthing the history of protest against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan
Photographs © by David Bacon

https://www.flickr.com/photos/56646659@N05/52759801492/in/album-72177720306862427/
 


 

Copyright © 2025 David Bacon Photographs and Stories, All rights reserved.
you're on this list because of your interest in david bacon's photographs and stories
Our mailing address is:
David Bacon Photographs and Stories
address on request
OaklandCa 94601

Making the Case: EPSTEIN ETC.

Friday, September 19, 2025

'Right out of Goodfellas': Cruz defies Trump on Kimmel, calls out 'mafio...

Rep. Crockett to Acosta: Epstein Didn’t Need a Deal, He Needed Prison

THE VIOLENT LEFT!!! | Armageddon Update

LIVID! Jimmy Kimmel EXPLODES at ABC, Wants Out!

BLACK MAGA TELLS LIES TO JUSTIFY [THE DEMAGOGUE]’S RACISM REGARDING DEI!

PARTIAL EPSTEIN CLIENT LIST REVEALED: Kash Patel Forced to Admit to Exis...

'I’m not silencing my voice': Governors speak out amid rising threats to...

Trump Has Shown Us Who He Is. Time For Us To Show The American People An...

The Fee of Racism is Costing MAGA Everything

Trump FIRES US ATTORNEY For Refusing to Bring FALSE CHARGES Against NY AG

Trump confesses he’s using FCC to stifle unfavorable coverage

Fox News PANICS ON AIR as Trump makes STUNNING ADMISSION

Jimmy Kimmel’s Removal Proves America Is Now a "Full Oligarchy" | Pivot

Leading Liar JD Vance: Called Trump ‘Noxious,’ Cried ‘Fascist,’ Now Gasl...

JIMMY KIMMEL: CANCELED

All HAVOC BREAKS LOOSE as Trump GETS BUSTED on FILM

🚨Judge INSTANTLY DISMISSES Trump’s NY TIMES LAWSUIT!!!

GOP Political Theater: Dems Boxed In As Republicans Push Sanitized ...

Murray, Blumenthal Lead Colleagues in Demanding Information from DHS on Mistreatment of Pregnant Women in ICE Detention

 

Murray, Blumenthal Lead Colleagues in Demanding Information from DHS on Mistreatment of Pregnant Women in ICE Detention

Senate Judiciary Committee report: Trump Administration appears to have ended presumption of release, is detaining more and more pregnant women in facilities ill-equipped to manage their well-being and safety;

ICYMI: Senator Murray Leads Colleagues in Reintroducing Legislation to Prevent the Shackling and Mistreatment of Pregnant Women in ICE and CBP Custody

***LETTER HERE***

Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), a senior member and former Chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pension (HELP) Committee, and Senator Blumenthal (D-CT), a member of the Judiciary Committee, led 27 of their Senate colleagues in a new letter expressing grave concerns about the prevalence and treatment of pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention. In their letter to U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, the lawmakers urgently requested that ICE stop detaining pregnant women absent exceptional circumstances, and asked the Department to provide information about the number of pregnant women in its custody and the treatment of pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women who are in ICE detention—as well as answers to a long list of additional oversight questions no later than September 26th.

A Government Accountability Office (GAO) study published in 2020 found that between 2016 and 2018, ICE detained pregnant women over 4,600 times. As Congress increased its oversight into the detention of pregnant women, that number dropped to just 158 pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women detained in the first half of Fiscal Year 2024. After President Trump took office this year, the Administration stopped providing reports to Congress on the number of pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women in their custody.

“We write to express grave concerns about the prevalence and treatment of pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention. A recent Senate Judiciary Committee site visit and media reports point to the alarming detention of a significant number of pregnant women in ICE custody. We urgently request that ICE cease detaining pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women absent exceptional circumstances and that the agency provide information about the number and treatment of pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women in its custody,” the senators wrote. In their letter, the senators referenced reporting on 911 calls recorded from ICE facilities involving pregnant women in “distress, bleeding or suffering severe pain,” as well as a recent Senate Judiciary Committee staff visit to the South Louisiana ICE Processing Center in Basile, LA that found 14 pregnant women—a shockingly large number—detained at the time of the visit, with many of them receiving little to no medical care.

“Medical research links ICE detention to high rates of pregnancy complications, with physicians finding serious risks to both fetal and maternal health.  These already serious risks are heightened by the deteriorating conditions inside detention facilities, including severe overcrowding, reports of inadequate food and water, and lack of emergency medical care,” the senators continued. “At this time, we do not know how many pregnant women are in ICE custody, whether U.S. citizen babies have been born in ICE custody, and what provisions have been made for mothers’ and children’s health, safety, and wellbeing.”

“ICE’s own standards are unambiguous on the detention, monitoring, and treatment of pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women in detention. ICE Directive 11032.4, Identification and Monitoring of Pregnant, Postpartum, or Nursing Individuals (2021 Pregnancy Directive), states that ICE should not detain pregnant, postpartum, or nursing individuals except under very limited circumstances,” the senators wrote. “If detention of these individuals is deemed absolutely necessary, the directive provides detailed requirements for ensuring that they are monitored closely, kept in suitable facilities, and given access to both routine and emergency health care… Given the urgent nature of pregnant women’s health and safety needs, we request that you ensure all detention facilities are in full compliance with current law and the 2021 Pregnancy Directive.”

Senator Murray has long fought against the mistreatment of pregnant women in detention, and leads legislation—the Stop Shackling and Detaining Pregnant Women Act—that would provide permanent safeguards for pregnant and postpartum women in ICE and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) custody. She first introduced the legislation in 2018 during the 115th Congress, and reintroduced it in 2019—on the heels of a Washington Post report about a woman in ICE custody whose pregnancy ended in a stillbirth after she went into labor prematurely—2023, and 2025 alongside Congresswoman Sylvia Garcia (D, TX-29), who leads companion legislation in the House of Representatives.

“In defiance of medical evidence counseling against their detention, ICE is horrifically detaining pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women in conditions that compromise their physical and mental health,” said Jennifer Ibañez Whitlock, Senior Policy Counsel for the National Immigration Law Center. “It is clear that ICE is ill-prepared to meet even the minimum healthcare and safety standards for pregnant women in their custody. The National Immigration Law Center calls on Secretary Noem to immediately halt the detention of pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women, resume transparent reporting, and ensure full compliance with federal law and agency directives. The health and dignity of these women must no longer be compromised.”

“U.S. policy makes clear that pregnant, postpartum, and lactating women should not be detained — yet ICE continues to ignore these protections,” said Zain Lakhani, Director of Migrant Rights and Justice at the Women’s Refugee Commission. “We continue to hear reports of pregnant women being held in dangerous conditions without adequate food or medical care, putting their health and lives at risk. These harms are occurring in a black box, where we know precious little about immigrant women’s access to healthcare and nutrition. We thank Senators Murray and Blumenthal for demanding that the Department of Homeland Security end this inhumane practice and call for vital transparency around their access to services. Together we must shine a light on detention conditions and ensure these women and their babies are treated with safety, dignity, and humanity.”

In addition to Murray and Blumenthal, the following 27 senators also signed onto the letter to Secretary Noem: Michael Bennet (D-CO), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Maria Cantwell (D-WA), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NM), Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), Richard Durbin (D-IL), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), John Hickenlooper (D-CO), Mazie Hirono (D-HI), Andy Kim (D-NJ), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Ben Ray Luján (D-NM), Ed Markey (D-MA), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Alex Padilla (D-CA), Jack Reed (D-RI), Jacky Rosen (D-NV), Brian Schatz (D-HI), Adam Schiff (D-CA), Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Tina Smith (D-MN), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Raphael Warnock (D-GA), Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Peter Welch (D-VT), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), and Ron Wyden (D-OR).

The full text of the letter is available HERE and below.

Secretary Noem:

We write to express grave concerns about the prevalence and treatment of pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention. A recent Senate Judiciary Committee site visit and media reports point to the alarming detention of a significant number of pregnant women in ICE custody. We urgently request that ICE cease detaining pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women absent exceptional circumstances and that the agency provide information about the number and treatment of pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women in its custody.

Medical research links ICE detention to high rates of pregnancy complications, with physicians finding serious risks to both fetal and maternal health. These already serious risks are heightened by the deteriorating conditions inside detention facilities, including severe overcrowding, reports of inadequate food and water, and lack of emergency medical care. According to one media investigation, since January 2025, at least four 911 calls have been recorded from ICE detention facilities involving pregnant women in “distress, bleeding or suffering severe pain”– including one involving a facility staff member. A recent Senate Judiciary Committee staff visit to the South Louisiana ICE Processing Center in Basile, Louisiana revealed that 14 pregnant women—a shockingly large number—were detained at the time of the visit. Women reported receiving little to no medical care and insufficient nutrition; some reported having never been seen by a physician in the facility, despite efforts to get care. The report shares an anecdote of “a pregnant woman who had a miscarriage while detained and was allegedly still bleeding when she was deported.”

Since the start of the Trump administration, accurate information about the number of pregnant women in ICE custody has been difficult to ascertain. Until this year, ICE provided semiannual reports to Congress on the number and treatment of pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women in immigration detention; however this previously required reporting has now ceased. Moreover, the effective closure of the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties and Office of the Immigration Detention Ombudsman means that there is little visibility and independent oversight of the treatment of vulnerable populations, including pregnant women.  At this time, we do not know how many pregnant women are in ICE custody, whether U.S. citizen babies have been born in ICE custody, and what provisions have been made for mothers’ and children’s health, safety, and wellbeing.

ICE’s own standards are unambiguous on the detention, monitoring, and treatment of pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women in detention. ICE Directive 11032.4, Identification and Monitoring of Pregnant, Postpartum, or Nursing Individuals (2021 Pregnancy Directive), states that ICE should not detain pregnant, postpartum, or nursing individuals except under very limited circumstances.  If detention of these individuals is deemed absolutely necessary, the directive provides detailed requirements for ensuring that they are monitored closely, kept in suitable facilities, and given access to both routine and emergency health care. ICE recently reaffirmed its commitment to the health and safety of detained pregnant women in the 2025 revisions to its National Detention Standards.

In response to our concerns that pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women may not be receiving necessary monitoring, health care, and treatment, we request answers to the following questions by September 26, 2025.

  1. As of the date of receipt of this letter, how many women currently in ICE custody are known to be pregnant, postpartum, and nursing? Please provide totals for each category. How many of those women currently are in their third trimester of pregnancy? For the purposes of defining “postpartum,” please use the number of women in the one-year period following the end of pregnancy.
  2. Section 5.4 of the 2021 Pregnancy Directive requires that pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women receive weekly evaluations to determine whether continued detention is appropriate.
    1. What is the process for conducting these evaluations and what criteria are used? From January 1, 2025 to the date of receipt of this letter, how many pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women have been released pursuant to one of these screenings? Who is conducting these evaluations and are they reported to ICE headquarters? If yes, what office?
    2. From January 1, 2025 to the date of receipt of this letter, how many have remained in ICE custody? Of those pregnant women who received determinations to remain in custody, how many were in their third trimester?
  3. Have any women given birth in ICE facilities from January 1, 2025 to the date of receipt of this letter, including both live and stillborn births? If so, how many live and stillborn births and in which facilities? In that same time frame, how many miscarriages have occurred?
  4. All children born on U.S. soil, including at ICE detention facilities, are U.S. citizens. For any child born in ICE custody, what is the process for allowing their mothers to secure U.S. birth certificates and other vital documents? Have any women been deported before having an opportunity to seek and obtain a birth certificate for their child?
  5. How many pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women have been deported since January 1, 2025? Please provide the monthly total.
  6. Section 2 of the 2021 Pregnancy Directive requires that pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women be detained in facilities that are suitable for their physical and mental health needs.
    1. What ICE facilities currently detain pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women? Please provide a list by facility name and location.
    2. What are the criteria for determining if a facility is suitable for pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women? Of the pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women in ICE custody, how many were detained in facilities that have been deemed suitable according to these criteria from January 1, 2025 to the date of receipt of this letter? What ICE office determined those facilities were suitable and when was that determination made?
    3. How many women since January 1, 2025 have been transferred into a suitable facility once it is discovered that they are pregnant, postpartum, and nursing? How many of these transfers occurred because the woman was pregnant?
  7. Since January 1, 2025, how many approved referrals for offsite obstetrics and gynecology services have been completed? How many inpatient hospitalizations related to active labor and birth for ICE detainees have occurred since January 1, 2025?
  8. Please describe pregnant women’s access to prenatal and postnatal health care in all ICE facilities that detain pregnant women, including routine medical examinations, treatment for pregnancy complications, and access to medical specialists such as OB/GYNs.
  9. Please describe the provisions for ensuring safe labor and delivery, including an opportunity for mother and child to bond immediately after birth.
  10. Current law (Section 528 of P.L. 118-47) and Section 2.3 of the 2021 Pregnancy Directive severely curtails the use of restraints on pregnant women at any time and prohibits them entirely during active labor and delivery.  If restraints are used, documented medical approval is required. Since January 1, 2025, have any pregnant women been placed in restraints? If yes, how many and at which locations have restraints been used on pregnant women?
  11. Please describe any provisions for ensuring that pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women have access to a diet that meets the U.S. government recommended dietary guidelines for pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women, which includes including fruits, dairy products, vegetables, to support a healthy pregnancy and ensure their safety after birth.

Given the urgent nature of pregnant women’s health and safety needs, we request that you ensure all detention facilities are in full compliance with current law and the 2021 Pregnancy Directive. We also request as a sign of your agency’s commitment to the care of all individuals in your custody that you immediately resume semiannual reporting on Pregnant, Postpartum, and Lactating Individuals in Immigration Detention.

We look forward to receipt of this reporting and responses to our questions.

###

Trump has DISASTER FRIDAY as Melania is REPULSED IN PUBLIC

LIVE: House Democrats hold a press conference

SICKLY Trump PUT IN HIS PLACE as Newsom GOES TO END HIS TERM

The Snapshot

Friday, September 19, 2025.  The Epstien-Maxwell abuse remains a story and applause and credit to Lawrence O'Donnell and PEOPLE magazine even if we can't credit a lot of other people and outlets, the Republicans have made clear to America that they do not side with the survivors and they made that clear in public if anyone was paying attention, Chump's attack on Jimmy Kimmel exposes everything that's wrong with media consolidation, government abuse and Chump The Tyrant himself.

Let's start with Lawrence O'Donnell from last night on MSNBC.



A few comments on the video.  When he arrived in England, Donald Chump was sporting natural skin on his face.  Yes, his heavily made up hands were to be noted -- and as Marcia's pointed out probably hideous to shake hands with him.  But his face was pretty much natural.  At some point, Chump needed his make up so it's good he packed it.  I always do.  Most women do.  Good to see Chump's just like most women.  How does MAGA handle that, by the way?  Their hero in face make up, their vice president in eye liner?  And let's all eye how MAGA pretends the two wimps are manly.

Donald Chump can't escape his friends Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein and this despite one of them being dead (Epstein) and the other being in prison (Maxwell).  Both, like Donald, are convicted felons and possibly, back in the day, when the three were fooling so many, they laughed about what they were getting away with?  Now Epstein and Maxwell are forever attached to Donald as though he stepped on them and can't rub them off the bottom of his shoe. 


Wednesday night Lawrence continued to shine a light on the survivors.  He did so again last night.  In the video above, he highlights a new statement from the survivors and let's put it in text form as well:


Statement by Jess Michaels, Rachel Benavidez, Danielle Bensky, Marijke Chartouni, Annie Farmer, Marina Lacerda, Lara Blume McGee, Amanda Roberts, Sky Roberts, Sharlene Rochard, Ashley Rubright and Liz Stein
Survivors of the crimes of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Mawell
We are struggling to understand what this means.  Even the limited information that has been made public includes accounts such as Virginia Giuffre's report that Epstein trafficked her to other individuals besides himself.
We are shocked by the testimony of FBI Director Kash Patel before the United States Senate and the House Oversight Committee.  Director Patel said that in the FBI's Jeffrey Epstein case fil there is "no credible information, none . . . that he trafficked to other individuals."  
We are struggling to understand what this means.  Even the limited information that has been made public includes accounts such as Virginia Giuffre's report that Epstein trafficked her to other individuals beside himself.  We also understand, as Representative Thomas Massie pointed out during the House Oversight hearing, that the are FBI reports documenting witness interviews in which victims of Epstein and Maxwell named at least 20 other men they were trafficked to. 
Director Patel's testimony raises more questions than answers.  For years he has railed bout the incompleteness of previous investigations.  He is right about that: previous investigations were indeed incomplete.  So what is his plan to make sure that a thorough and unbiased investigation is conducted at last?
He seems to acknowledge that the FBI FD-302 reports, naming other men to whom Epstein-Maxwell victims were trafficked, are real.  So will he release those reports to the House Oversight Committee and to the public?  He seems to imply that officials in previous administrations deemed those reports not to be credible.  He has not read the reports himself; he has not spoken to the victims himself; and yet he plans to defer to unnamed officials from prior administrations who treated the reports as not credible?  How can this be?  Those previous administrations are the ones that Kash Patel spent years accusing of a cover-up.  Now he will pass the buck to them to decide that information about other men in the Epstein-Maxwell trafficking ring is not even worth following up on?  There are victims and witnesses who to this day, have still not been interviewed.  Will they continue to be ignored?  Survivors deserve better, and so does the public.  We deserve answers to questions like these:
*Do the FBI and the Justice Department have a plan to conduct a proper investigation at last?  What is that plan?
*Will you release the FD-302 forms containing   witness accounts of men to whom Epstein and Maxwell trafficked women and girls?
*Who were the officials in previous administrations who deemed the FD-302 reports not credible?  Why are you deferring to that decision without reading the reports or interviewing the witnesses yourself? 
*Given the number of times that survivors of Epstein-Maxwell abuse have been betrayed by the justice system, how will you ensure an unbiased and truth-seeking process that survivors can trust? 
Director Patel testified that the "original sin" of the Epstein case was the unconscionable non-prosecution deal that US Attorney Alex Acosta gave Epstein, and the "limited" investigation Acosta conducted. 
As head of the FBI, Director Patel can work now to remedy that, in a way that finally centers survivor voices and finally pursues the whole truth.  The public demands it; the victims deserve it; and our system of justice without fear or favor requires it.  Survivors are waiting. 

That's a powerful statement and an important one.  We're going to comment on it in a few seconds more but our main comment for right now is that Lawrence highlighted it.  In full.

That statements is news.  It's news even if the news media ignores it.

Which, for the record, they have.  Look for any outlet that covered it. 


Did any other print or online outlets cover it.  We know Lawrence covered it.  But where's THE WASHINGTON POST, THE NEW YORK TIMES, DAILY BEAST, go down the list.  Jake Tapper did post it to his Instagram

Where are the others?

Yesterday, we were going to focus on one or maybe two hearings.  The one I planned to focus on wa the Wednesday hearing Ka$h Patel appeared before, the House Judiciary Committee hearing.  Tuesday, he appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee and we covered that in Wednesday's snapshot.


But Chump and FCC chose Wednesday to remind the American people of how government can be weaponized and crimes can be committed as long as you have people to serve you, people like NEXSTAR who have benefitted from media consolidation and want to benefit even more.  It's a cautionary tale of how corruption and greed does not benefit democracy.  We all saw what a threat they are to the American way.  

And the good news there is that Chump's overplaying his hand and accelerating his own political demise.

My problem was Friday morning.  How do I cover the Wednesday hearing?

Ari did a great job on MSNBC covering the hearing.



And another aspect is covered by many -- probably  Lisandra Gomez-Tate (2PARAGRAPHS) does it best when she notes:


Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday voted against four efforts from Democrats to subpoena records related to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Note: Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) was the only Republican on the House Judiciary Committee to vote in favor of the motions.
One of the four efforts was made by Democratic Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett (D-TX), who filed a motion to subpoena the director of Bureau of Prisons to testify and answer questions regarding the recent transfer of Epstein’s former partner, convicted sex offender Ghislaine Maxwell, from a prison in Florida to a lower security facility in Texas.

[NOTE: Maxwell was transferred after being interviewed by President Donald Trump‘s deputy attorney general Todd Blanche (Trump’s former personal criminal defense attorney). The Department of Justice has not opened a new investigation into the Epstein case or Maxwell, who is currently serving a 20-year sentence.]

The House Republicans who voted to table Crockett’s motion to subpoena the Bureau of Prisons director, also voted against Congresswoman Mary Gay Scanlan‘s (D-PA) motion to subpoena “suspicious activity reports related to Epstein and Maxwell.”

Chump can't pull free of them but Republicans in Congress can certainly run interference for him.  Why is that?  

Antonio Pequeño IV (FORBES) also  reports the Committee voted along party lines with the exception of Republican Thomas Massie, the Committee chaired by Republican Jim Jordan aka studying the boys in the showers as Isaiah's noted in February 21, 2024's  "Jim Jordan Has More Free Time"

jim jordan



Isaiah's latest THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS "Jim Jordan Has More Free Time." US House Rep Jim Jordan sits in the locker room looking off in the distance while declaring, "Eye on the prize. Eye on the prize." One man by the lockers points out, "Jim Jordan is staring right into the boys' showers." The second man explains, "At this point, with his Alexander Smirnov embarrassment, he figures what does he have to lose?"  Isaiah archives his comics at THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS.    



If I'm covering it and especially if I'm covering it late, I need to pick up something no one's noting about the hearing.

And fortunately, there is so much corruption in the Republican Party that I'm able to do that.

The American people and the survivors need to understand that the Republicans in Congress -- with few exceptions -- are trying to trick them, trying to deceive them.

It's happening right in front of our eyes and no one's noting it.

Wednesday's hearing was a sham.

Right before our eyes.

I'm really not sure why someone who is currently and actively accused of covering up the sexual abuse of young men is allowed to preside over a hearing about the sexual abuse of girls and young women.  Can someone explain that to me?

What Jim Jordan has done is say that the survivors are lying.  I'm referring to the survivors, the college males, who say he covered up and enabled their abuse.  I'm referring to the brother of a survivor that Jordan called and begged him -- to the point of crying on the phone -- to publicly say that his own brother was lying.

These are serious accusations and they have not been dismissed.  So why the hell is he allowed to preside over this.

I would argue it's a conflict of interest.  But you can give him the benefit of the doubt and pretend that all the male survivors are lying.  You can do that.  Even if you do, though?  It's still the appearance of a conflict of interest.

MAGA, you clung to Chump because he and the Republican Party was going to ensure justice for children and young adults who were the victims of sexual abuse.

But Republicans in the House are letting this Committee be chaired by a man accused of enabling the abuse of young men -- of enabling it for years and of denying his enabling.

He shouldn't be on this Committee, let alone serving as Chair.  It is a clear conflict of interest.

And it's a lot worse -- Jordan's alleged involvement -- than what you've heard of in the press.  

In June, HBO  began airing a documentary entitled SURVIVING OHIO STATE.  Ava and I reviewed it in "Media: Truth Molested Versus Truth Told:"


Fortunately, HBO started airing a strong, new documentary last week SURVIVING OHIO STATE. The documentary about the assault and abuse of male athletes at Ohio State for several decades is produced by  Eva Orner (who also directed), David Glasser, George Clooney, Grant Heslov, Joshua Rofe and Steven J. Berger.

 

Survivors talk on camera about how they were abused and assaulted by Dr Richard Strauss.  They talk about it and they talk about how wrestling coach Russ Hellickson and assistant coach Jim Jordan knew about the abuse and laughed at it and looked the other way.  Multiple players discuss how they went to Hellickson and asked him to stand with them as they went public and he said he would.  But Jim wouldn't.  Jim was now US House Rep Jim Jordan.  Suddenly, Russ wanted nothing to do with the men that he had hailed as his sons and Jim was too busy doing things like calling one of the accusers brothers up on the phone and begging him -- in tears -- to come forward and accuse his brother of lying in order to save Jim's reputation.  

 

Watching, we were reminded of a man who was the envy of a huge number of straight men at one point because of whom he was married to. The man who is still alive was a college athlete in another state in an earlier time and he was pimped out to men.  He even managed to turn it into a career starter.  And he was happy to do it because he says he's bi (he's gay).  He'll be dead soon and he'll die a disgrace (he's already disgraced himself once this year).  

 

He was able to get away with his act because of attitudes about gay people.  He didn't seem gay, right?  And athletes are big and strong.

 

Male.

 

Male athletes are meat.  That's the attitude.  They can endure anything. They can take being ripped off by universities that basically own their bodies for four years.  They can take this and that.  And nobody better ever complain because you're not supposed to think, you're supposed to be an animal -- on the field and off. 

"Our coaches knew," one survivor explains in the new documentary.   Another explains, "We had guys complaining about Dr. Strauss to Jim Jordan."

A female coach did take it seriously and did lodge complaints and concerns about what Strauss was doing with the young men.

 

What was he doing?

 

"One of the wrestlers said, 'Dude, why does this guy have to constantly check our nuts, check our dicks."

 Another explains how Jim Jordan at one point says, "If he ever did that to me, I'd snap his neck like a stick of dry balsa wood." 

  

At other times, the future member of Congress downplayed it.  He told one wrestler, "It's Strauss.  You know what he does."


And this came in reply to the wrestler complaining that the team doctor was now in the locker room with the team, taking showers with the team, masturbating in the showers.  

He was allowed a locker in every male team's locker room.  He took several showers a day.  When he would shower, he wouldn't turn to the wall where the nozzle was, he'd put his back to the wall so he could study the young males.  As one survivor explains, "He's showering three times a day.  He's sporting erections.  He's masturbating."

And Jim Jordan and Russ Hellickson looked the other way.  They were supposed to protect the students.  They were legally obligated to protect them -- in loco parentis.  They failed.  And, years later, they won't grow the hell up and admit that they failed these men.

 

They always knew and they looked the other way.

 

A survivor explains he goes to Strauss and tells the doctor, "'My foot is sore.  My foot is sore.'  And the first thing he says to me is 'Drop your trousers'."  Another explains, "I got in there and showed him my bleeding ear and the first thing Dr Strauss said was, 'Drop your shorts'."

 

Documentaries, when they're truthful, can make a difference.  The Ohio State athletes never really had their day in the court of public opinion because this was the first case that really addressed how colleges and universities prey on young men.  They make millions off them but will dump them in a minute due to a sports' injury.  The survivors of Strauss talk about being on scholarships and how Strauss and his 'physicals' decided whether or not they played.  We're not used to seeing the college 'beasts' as potential victims.  They had that wall to break through with this scandal.  

 

Their stories are consistent and address what they witnessed and what they experienced.  

 

That's the great thing about truth -- it usually comes out.  Sometimes it comes out too late.  Sometimes, it's dismissed initially.  But it does usually come out and it slowly leaks into our national consciousness and national conversation.   


That piece struck a chord with a lot of readers.  Among those who responded?  Several survivors of that college abuse scandal.  We followed up some of those e-mails with phone calls. The allegations are much worse against Jim Jordan than what the press has covered.

But grasp that even with what has been covered, Jordan is accused of breaking the law.  It was his duty to protect these young males and he knew about the abuse and refused to protect them.  That makes him an accomplice.  Per the law, he is an accomplice to the abuse.

And Republicans in the House are letting him not only sit on this Committee but also chair it?

The survivors, in fact the entire American public, needs to grasp what is going down.

A hearing asking question about sexual abuse is being chaired by someone accused of covering sexual abuse.  Reminder, in July, Corky Siemaszko (NBC NEWS) reported:


Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, one of the Republican Party’s top inquisitors in Congress, is expected to be deposed Friday about allegations that he failed to protect the wrestlers he once coached at Ohio State University from a sexual predator, four plaintiffs in lawsuits against the university told NBC News.

Jordan, who was the assistant wrestling coach at the university from 1986 to 1994 before he got into politics, has repeatedly and publicly denied any knowledge that the team’s doctor, Richard Strauss, was preying on the athletes.

It will be the first time Jordan has be questioned under oath by lawyers representing hundreds of former OSU students, both athletes and nonathletes, who are suing the school for damages in federal court in the Southern District of Ohio. Jordan is not a defendant, but he is referred to in some of the lawsuits alleging he was aware of the abuse.


If you want the answers in a hearing, you don't put someone accused of  covering up the same sort of crime on the Committee, let alone in charge of it.

You only do that, if you want a cover up.

He should not be allowed to chair these hearings nor, for that matter, even sit in on them.  It's a clear ethical violation.  


Here's another reminder.  Coaches can't hide behind "horseplay."  If they physically touch a player in an inappropriate way, they can't hide behind "horseplay."  If a player were to have told Jordan specifically what the doctor was doing and Jordan had laughed and ran his hands along the male's crotch saying "Like this?," "horseplay" wouldn't excuse that.  


I'm sure Jim never let it go that far, right?  That he didn't just observe but also participated? Because Jim laying his hands on a boy's crotch would have been participating.  We all get that, right?  And surely the answer to that would be no, right?

He needs to be kicked off the Committee immediately.  It's already an insult to the survivors of Epstein and Maxwell that he's been on the Committee so far but a line needs to be drawn in the sand immediately that, going forward, he doesn't chair any committee on Epstein, Maxwell or sexual abuse. 

Failure to draw that line is the GOP making clear that they don't really care about going after abusers and pedophiles.

 
The Jimmy Kimmel story remains an important one.  Chump's actions are illegal and an abuse of the office.  This is a story of how media consolidation hurts us all (NEXSTAR already has too many stations -- so many that announcing it won't carry a program can get the program cancelled).  It's a story of reality -- the 'cancellers' are almost always right-wingers.  Ask Morgan Fairchild if the left was screaming for FLAMINGO ROAD to be pulled from the airwaves?  (No, it wasn't it was the right-wing 'Moral' Majority.)  And, again, Chump's overreach is exposing him for the tyrant he truly is.  

But let's note some other takes on it.




ADDED:  

The Black Commentator Issue #1055 is now Online
 
September 18, 2025

     

Read issue 1055

Our email address is BlackCommentator@gmail.com

Our voicemail number is 856.823.1739

The Black Commentator | P.O. Box 2635A weekly publication dedicated to economic justice, social justice and peace.,
Tarpon Springs, FL 34688-2635
The following sites updated: