Friday, May 29, 2026

The Snapshot

Friday, May 29, 2026.  Chump spins a deal is coming but in the meantime the war drags on, the US economy is doing awful under Chump (no blaming Joe Biden for this), Chump sues THE WALL STREET JOURNAL again over their months old report on the birthday card Chump made for his best bud Jeffrey Epstein, Pam da Bimbo Bondi is set to appear before the House Oversight Committee today, news of Don Jr's crony corruption emerges, and much more. 


Ben covers the news of Chump's conceding to Tehran in the latest version of a deal.




Three months after President Trump launched war on Iran, his seemingly haphazard approach to the conflict is bewildering allies at home and abroad as he veers between diplomatic dealing, military strikes and increasingly far-fetched ideas.

It is possible that Mr. Trump is near a breakthrough in the form of what both sides call an interim agreement that would reopen the Strait of Hormuz and begin detailed talks on Iran’s nuclear program. But U.S. officials said on Thursday that Mr. Trump had not yet signed off on the agreement, and several others like it have fallen apart.

Now let's turn to Chump's war on the economy.   


Though con man Chump would love to believe the country believes him when he blames inflation on Joe Biden, that's not the case.  Groceries and gas and energy are all much more expensive over a year and a half into Chump's reign than they were under Joe.  In fact, Alicia Wallace (CNN) notes inflation is at a three year high.  Economic professors D. Brian Blank and Brandy Hadley (THE CONVERSATION) explain:


Americans don’t need a press release to know that inflation is rising. Gasoline is above $4 per gallon amid the ongoing conflict in the Middle East and closure of the Strait of Hormuz, and the release of key price data on May 28, 2026, underscores why policymakers are worried these pressures could spread into the broader economy.

The report offered a mixed but still uncomfortable picture. The month-to-month rise was softer than expected, but the change year over year still points to concern: a 3.8% jump from a year earlier, the fastest pace since 2021, and a less volatile index that excludes food and energy up 3.3%.

This increase suggests inflation isn’t limited to gasoline. Housing, utilities and recreational spending are also keeping underlying inflation elevated, even as other data shows a slowing economy and weaker income growth.


Yeah and it's all happening under Chump.  And it was his tariffs that first wrecked the economy and his war of choice on Iran that destroyed the economy.  No pinning this on Joe Biden.  The economy was recovering (from COVID and Chump's first term) under Joe.  No blaming this on Joe.  It's Donald Chump's economy.  No one else is to blame.  Adam Lynch has some bad news for Chump:

Economist and public policy scholar Justin Wolfers says Republicans and President Donald Trump have not only set themselves up for a brutal midterm, but voters will probably be holding them accountable for high inflation and fuel prices for years.

“There is a bomb that has hit the world economy and to any of us who watch the economy, there's no question that the economy today is different than it was in February,” Wolfers told podcaster Jacqueline Cole.
The damage Trump and the GOP have done doesn’t amount to a dip or a drop. It’s much bigger than that — and more permanent. Wolfers described it more as a “crater” resulting from Trump’s bomb

“Okay, so we'll start with the oil prices. Oil prices today are higher than they were — they’re about $100 a barrel. They were $60, but I can see oil price futures, which tells me how long oil prices will be higher than they would otherwise be and the answer is ‘for several years,’” said Wolfers. “It could be that they think this conflict goes on for longer or they think that this conflict is laying the ground for future conflicts. But get used to it. Energy is more expensive and will be for a while.”


The combination of forces bearing down on Trump’s economy spells trouble for Republicans in the upcoming midterms. The president’s economic approval rating is at an all-time low. Gas prices have been stuck above $4 per gallon for weeks due to the war with Iran, according to AAA. Yields on long-term government debt and mortgage rates have spiked as inflation rose — and are now being further stoked by rising energy costs and mounting piles of government debt.

Chump elected to go to war on Iran with the belief that it would be a two week or so operation.  Yesterday ended three months of ongoing war.  And it's still not over.  He thought he could do this on the quick and that it wouldn't harm GOP chances in the midterms..  Monday, it will be June.  Midterms take place at the start of November.   

"He's walking away with a nuclear Iran," Joe Scarborough declared today on MS NOW's MORNING JOE. 



Jake Sullivan points out that every new 'deal' Chump comes up with gives Iran a little more.  And its continuation, the war's continuation, just continues to kill the US economy. 



There's a call for North Carolina lawmakers to do more to help college graduates as they enter the workforce.

ABC News finds that the unemployment rate for recent college graduates sits at 5.6 percent, which is notably higher than the overall unemployment rate.

The New York Federal Reserve calls the job market for grads this year "challenging."

Annabelle Rosse received her diploma from NC State earlier this month and wants to call Raleigh home.

Her immediate family is planning to move overseas and she'll be here on her own building a life.

Rosse says she's struggled to find a job in this economy.

"It's definitely a little bit shaky. Definitely a bit unstable in terms of there's not a lot of opportunities out there and if there are, they want you to have a multitude of experiences," she said.

At FORBES, Bill Conerly notes the failing consumer confidence, "The Index of Consumer Sentiment, has been published by the University of Michigan since 1952, but has never been as low as the May 2026 level. Both of the major subcomponents, current conditions and expected conditions, fell."  


Again, no blaming Joe Biden for this.  It's all on Chump.  Steve Benen (MS NOW) points out:

Donald Trump and his allies, on a nearly daily basis, tell the public the current American economy is the “greatest” ever. During one of JD Vance’s recent Fox News appearances, the vice president celebrated the “Trump boom.” A week earlier, Peter Navarro, a leading White House voice on trade and economic policy, told Fox News that the U.S. economy was “perfect.”

Widespread polling shows broad dissatisfaction with current economic conditions. Team Trump seems to think incessant happy talk can change public attitudes.

The problem for White House officials isn’t just that their rhetoric appears wildly out of touch, it’s also that reality keeps getting in the way of their claims.
[. . .]

This not what Americans were told to expect. As recently as August, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confidently predicted to a national television audience that the U.S. economy is “really going to pick up in the fourth quarter” of 2025. It did not, and as the spring of 2026 continues, Americans are still waiting for conditions to really “pick up.”
Similarly, in early September, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said during a CNBC interview that Americans will see robust growth “six months from now.”

That was eight months ago. He’s still wrong.

What’s more, earlier this year, Lutnick predicted, “I think we’re going to grow more than 5% GDP this quarter.” As of Thursday morning, we now know that growth in the first quarter was actually 1.6% — roughly a third of his prediction.


In other news, David Edwards (RAW STORY) reports that Chump has filed another lawsuit against the press.  This time?  THE WALL STREET JOURNAL and he's filing it (again) over their coverage of Jeffrey Epstein and Chump -- Two roll dogs in love and lust:


President Donald Trump has refiled his $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal — and to bolster his case, he's leaning on a key witness interview conducted by Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, the president's own former personal attorney.

In an amended complaint filed Tuesday in federal court in Miami, Trump's lawyers cited a July 2025 interview with Ghislaine Maxwell as evidence that the Journal's reporting was false. What the filing doesn't mention is that the interview was conducted by Blanche who was serving as Deputy Attorney General at the time and has since been elevated to Acting Attorney General — and who granted Maxwell limited immunity to participate.
The lawsuit centers on a July 2025 Wall Street Journal story reporting that a bawdy birthday letter bearing Trump's name was included in a 2003 album Maxwell compiled to celebrate Jeffrey Epstein's 50th birthday. The letter, the Journal reported, featured a typewritten note framed by a hand-drawn outline of a naked woman, with a signature mimicking pubic hair. Trump has denied writing it.

The amended complaint argues Maxwell's statements to federal investigators undercut the Journal's reporting. "Maxwell has stated, subject to penalty of perjury for lying to a federal officer, that she did not remember President Trump submitting a letter for Epstein's 50th birthday," the filing reads.

Penalty of perjury for lying?  Maxwell lied throughout the interview with Blanche. November 18, Brian Bennett (TIME) reported:


On a Friday night in August, a top Trump official announced on X that he was releasing the transcript of his interview with Jeffrey Epstein conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell. "Except for the names of victims, every word is included. Nothing removed. Nothing hidden," wrote Todd Blanche, Trump’s Deputy Attorney General and former personal lawyer.

The transcript, which showed Maxwell saying she didn’t recall ever seeing Donald Trump at Epstein’s house, did little to quell the furor among Trump's base around allegations that it was covering up damaging information on Epstein. Now the interview and the Justice Department’s actions around it are coming under renewed scrutiny in the wake of emails released by Congress last week, including one from 2011 in which Epstein apparently told Maxwell that Trump had previously spent “hours” at his house.
Maxwell is serving 20 years in prison for conspiring with Epstein to sexually abuse minors over the course of a decade. Blanche interviewed Maxwell in Tallahassee, Fl., on July 24 and 25. Days after the interview, Maxwell was transferred from a low-security federal prison in Florida to an all-women minimum-security prison northeast of Houston called Federal Prison Camp Bryan. The Department of Justice did not respond to a request for comment for this story.
[. . .]

During the interview, Blanche asked Maxwell about Trump and Epstein’s relationship. “I don't think they were close friends or I certainly never witnessed the President in any of -- I don't recall ever seeing him in his house, for instance,” Maxwell said. “I actually never saw the President in any type of massage setting. I never witnessed the President in any inappropriate setting in any way,” she said.  Maxwell had been told she could face consequences if she lied. During the interview, Blanche told Maxwell if she says something that’s not true, “we can bring a prosecution against you for what's called false statements.” 

In an email released last week and dated April 2, 2011, Epstein appears to have written to Maxwell: “i want you to realize that that dog that hasn’t barked is trump. [VICTIM] spent hours at my house with him .. he has never once been mentioned.” Maxwell replied: “I have been thinking about that…”



During the interview, Maxwell repeatedly claims that she did not introduce Epstein to any minors over the course of their relationship together. Some attorneys have also questioned the validity of Maxwell’s words, as she has in the past been charged with perjury for lying under oath.

[. . .]

She also claimed that neither she nor Epstein ever poached workers from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate, which was down the street from Epstein’s Palm Beach home. 

“I’ve never recruited a masseuse from Mar-a-Lago,” Maxwell said, despite the accusations of the late Virginia Giuffre, who claims she was recruited at 16 by Maxwell from working at Mar-a-Lago and then later paid to have sex with Prince Andrew. Though Giuffre was never named in the interview, Maxwell denies Giuffre’s claims. 
Maxwell’s words contradict those of the President, though, who told reporters late last month that Epstein “stole” young women who worked at his Mar-a-Lago beach club spa, which led to Trump banning Epstein from his estate.

[. . .]

The family of Virginia Giuffre said they were “outraged” about the interview and that the information directly contradicts her conviction of child sex trafficking.

“During DAG Todd Blanche’s bizarre interview, [Maxwell] is never challenged about her court-proven lies, providing her a platform to rewrite history,” the family said in a statement released on Saturday. “This travesty of injustice entirely invalidates the experiences of the many brave survivors who put their safety, security, and lives on the line to ensure [Maxwell’s] conviction, including our sister.”


A federal judge dismissed the lawsuit last month, ruling he couldn’t claim the paper published the story with actual malice. Then Trump refiled and ran into another stumbling block on May 13, when U.S. District Judge Darrin Gayles ruled that he couldn’t use the discovery process in his claims that the newspaper defamed him. In the new lawsuit, Trump’s lawyers wrote that the Journal’s reporters tried to “falsely pass off as fact that President Trump, in 2003, wrote, drew, and signed this letter” but “failed to show proof.”
Trump’s reasoning for the lawsuit is hollow, especially considering that the House Oversight Committee included the birthday book, complete with the drawing from Trump, in a September release of Epstein materials from his estate. It’s more likely that Trump is trying to shake down the Journal for a big settlement and intimidate its owners, the Murdoch family, into favorable coverage.

It’s a pattern that Trump has followed against other media companies, which ended up forking over money that supposedly is going to Trump’s presidential library. Trump also has pending defamation lawsuits against The New York Times for $15 billion and the BBC for $10 billion. It seems that he won’t stop until he’s made them pay for reporting that he doesn’t like.



Still on Epstein but let's bring in Pam da Bimbo Bondi.





Survivors of the disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein have little faith former U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi’s upcoming appearance before a congressional committee will help address any of their unanswered questions about the Justice Department’s release of the Epstein files. 
Bondi — who was removed as attorney general earlier this year — is set to appear before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on Friday about DOJ’s handling of the documents.
Danielle Bensky, a 2004-2005 Epstein survivor, told NewsNation she has a list of questions about the release, including the decision-making process surrounding redactions. 

“Why are perpetrators and abusers redacted, when survivors’ personal information including addresses, phone numbers, intimate details of abuse and nude photos were released. Why was the release deadline delayed, if not for the protection of victims? What was the point of the slow rollout? Who were the lawyers involved in charge of redacting? The list goes on,” Bensky said. 

She told NewsNation in February she was improperly named in a release of 3.5 million documents and called the DOJ’s handling of the case “egregious.” 

Bensky added that leaving her name unredacted felt like an attempt to discredit her and other victims.  
Bensky said she — as well as the 14 other survivors she talked with — were never contacted by the DOJ prior to the release earlier this year.  


That's later today that da Bimbo Bondi is expected to appear before the House Oversight Committee.  She is no longer Attorney General -- Chump fired her April 2nd.  Life has not gone well for da Bimbo.  She's currently being treated for thyroid cancer.  And she's facing a complaint.  Tom Latchem (DAILY BEAST) notes:

Former U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi has been hit with a damning new ethics complaint demanding she be investigated and possibly disbarred.

The complaint was lodged on Wednesday with the Florida Bar by Peggy Quince, 78, a retired chief justice of the Florida Supreme Court, and is backed by more than 120 judges, law professors, and attorneys.

It is their second attempt after the Florida Bar rejected an earlier bid last June, while Bondi, 60, was still in office, on the grounds that it does not investigate sitting federal appointees. President Donald Trump, 79, fired her in April, removing that hurdle.
The coalition—backed by Lawyers Defending American Democracy, the Democracy Defenders Fund, and Lawyers for the Rule of Law—says Bondi strong-armed DOJ lawyers into compromising their ethics or losing their jobs. “No one lawyer is above the law,” Quince said in a statement.

Much of the complaint zeroes in on Bondi’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files. It accuses Bondi of misleading the public about a supposed “client list” she once claimed was on her desk, then bungling the document release so badly that unredacted names, birth dates, and even nude photos of the disgraced financier’s victims spilled out.

Lawyers for the survivors branded one January dump “the single most egregious violation of victim privacy in one day in United States history,” with Virginia Canter, chief counsel at the Democracy Defenders Fund, saying, “Lawyers have been disbarred for less.”



The complaint also charges that Bondi waved through prosecutions lacking probable cause against Trump’s foes—among them former FBI director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James, whose cases a federal judge threw out in November—and against protesters swept up at immigration raids. Comey was re-indicted in late April on a different charge, under her replacement, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, who was formerly Trump’s personal attorney.

THE LOS ANGELES TIMES' Ben Wieder explains differences between how da Bimbo will present and respond as opposed to the way others have been required to do:


For one, the former attorney general will not be under oath in a sworn deposition but will provide a transcribed interview, which is voluntary. Bondi’s interview with the committee will happen behind closed doors with members of the committee and staff and will not be filmed. The committee says it plans to release a transcript soon after the hearing.

And Bondi will be represented at her interview by Assistant Atty. Gen. Harmeet Dhillon, which legal experts say raises the prospects that the Department of Justice could direct Bondi to not answer some questions posed by the committee.

Former Atty. Gen. William Barr, former President Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton all gave sworn depositions.

Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), the chair of the committee, rejected the Clintons’ offer to provide a transcribed interview, rather than sit for a deposition, out of concern that someone giving a transcribed interview could “refuse to answer whatever questions he wanted for whatever reasons he wanted.”


Julie K Brown serves up some reality on why Bondi has questions to answer:

Pam Bondi has a lot of explaining to do.

In July 2025, she and FBI Director Kash Patel announced that the Epstein case was closed, and there was no evidence of additional crimes committed by Epstein or others associated with him.

Case closed.

Let me say this in another way: One of the most prolific sex offenders in history — someone who made millions and perhaps even billions of dollars — without any real investigation into his finances or his businesses and associates — basically committed all this crimes all by himself.

He created a worldwide criminal syndicate in which no one was involved except for two people: him and Ghislaine Maxwell.

Even Bondi isn’t stupid enough to believe this. She knows that, over the decades since Epstein served jail time in his nice office in Florida that he was still manipulating the levers of power.
There is plenty of evidence that the FBI knew that Epstein was involved in a myriad of crimes over the years. In the years after his arrest in Florida — when Bondi was attorney general [for the state of Florida] — more victims were coming forward, alleging for example, that other men were involved. Lawsuits were filed. Depositions were taken.





Turning to Chump's corruption, Edith Olmsted (THE NEW REPUBLIC) notes:

A top White House adviser intervened to send a massive defense loan to a company linked to Donald Trump Jr., ProPublica reported Thursday.

In November, the Pentagon announced a $620 million loan to Vulcan Elements, a start-up manufacturer of rare earth elements. Just three months earlier, Don Jr.’s venture capital firm 1789 Capital had purchased a large stake in the company. When the Defense Department deal first came together, those involved were quick to deny allegations of political favoritism.
But in fact, the deal was reportedly the work of the White House.

The massive loan was personally directed by Peter Navarro, a White House adviser who is also a friend of the president’s son, according to interviews and DOD records obtained by ProPublica. Of the many companies being considered to receive funding, Vulcan was the only one that garnered the attention of one of the president’s top aides, one Pentagon official told ProPublica.
Defense officials were instructed to move at a rapid pace to see that the loan was processed, and it went through within a matter of weeks, according to another Pentagon official who spoke to ProPublica. “The call came from the White House: We have to get this done,” the person said.


Crony corruption.  Don Junior handed millions.  Let's move to Robert Faturechi's PRO-PUBLICA article:


The deal is one of many actions by the Trump administration that have helped companies in which the Trump family holds stakes. Government contracts and other benefits have gone to various Trump-linked companies, prompting allegations of self-dealing by Democratic lawmakers and good government experts. But ProPublica’s reporting on the Vulcan loan represents the first time the awarding of a contract from a federal agency has been directly linked to White House intervention.

The loan was a massive financial commitment from the Pentagon in its effort to fund companies that could help the U.S. reduce dependence on China’s critical mineral supply chains. The deal was a dramatic win for Vulcan, a North Carolina rare-earth magnet company launched just two years earlier. Estimates of its valuation grew tenfold after the deal was announced. It was also a win for Trump Jr.’s venture capital firm, which took a stake of undisclosed size in Vulcan about three months before the Pentagon announced the deal.
And there may be more good news on the way for the president’s eldest son. Among other companies under review for a Pentagon loan was a drone parts manufacturer that Trump Jr. advises and owns a stake in, according to one of the defense officials who spoke to ProPublica. 

 Navarro, who served as trade adviser in Trump’s first term, and Trump Jr. have formed a close bond in recent years. The president’s son visited Navarro in prison while he served time for defying a subpoena from lawmakers investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot. Trump Jr. was one of the small group of people Navarro dedicated his latest book to for having “my back when it was against the wall.” And a week before the Vulcan deal was announced, Trump Jr. hosted Navarro — now the president’s senior counselor for trade and manufacturing — on his streaming show, encouraging his nearly 2 million subscribers to buy Navarro’s book. That interview was not long after word came down from Navarro to Pentagon staff to make the massive loan to Vulcan, one of the defense officials involved in the deal said.





Let's wind down with this from Senator Patty Murray's office:

Government Accountability Office (GAO) announces investigation into transfer of defaulted student loan portfolio from Education Department (ED) to Treasury Department, other interagency agreements

Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senators Patty Murray (D-WA), Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP), and Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Ranking Member of the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies, received a response to their request from the Government Accountability Office (GAO), an independent government watchdog, confirming the expansion of its investigation into the Department of Education’s (ED) transfer of critical programs to other agencies through interagency agreements (IAAs), including the transfer of student loan default collections to the Department of the Treasury. Following a letter from Senators Murray, Warren, Sanders, and Baldwin, GAO previously confirmed it had initiated an investigation into ED’s transfer of grant programs for career and technical education and adult education to the Department of Labor.

“These illegal agreements jeopardize the resources students and families rely on and weaken our nation’s education system,” said Senator Murray. “The GAO’s investigation is an important step in protecting the programs that serve our students and the rights they are entitled to by law. I’ll keep fighting back to ensure our students and schools receive all the support they deserve.”

Last summer, the Trump administration formalized an IAA moving the day-to-day management of career and technical education and adult education grant programs, like Perkins V and AEFLA, from ED to the Labor Department. The Administration has since entered into nine other IAAs moving the administration of large parts of the Department of Education to other federal agencies. On February 19, the senators asked GAO to investigate the agreements’ impacts on program costs, timely access to funding, access to services, and quality of technical assistance for grantees.

On March 11, the GAO confirmed it had opened an investigation into ED’s transfer of grant programs to the Department of Labor and other agencies, writing: “GAO accepts your request as work that is within the scope of its authority.” 

Now, GAO is expanding its probe. In the new letter, GAO wrote that it has initiated work in response to the lawmakers’ February request for a review of the impacts of ED’s IAAs and that it intends to initiate additional workstreams reviewing other IAAs announced by ED, including the transfer of student loan default collections from ED to the Treasury Department.

The full text of the letter is available HERE.

###








Trump GOES INTO HIDING and Prepares FULL SURRENDER!!!

HOW ABOUT YOU GO TRY AND SAVE ALL THE PREDATORS IN CHURCH!

🚨Trump STUNNED as Judges DECLARE “FRAUD ON THE COURT”

Erin Brockovich on AI data centers: 'People aren't being heard'

Who's Most Likely? Live Show - Matteo Lane & Nick Smith - I Never Liked You 122

Sen. Cory Booker: ICE detention center a ‘moral stain,' opposes more funding

Rep. Stansbury: I visited Zorro Ranch, here's what I found

MAGAS SAY THEY ARE LEAVING CALIFORNIA AND GUESS WHAT? WE DO NOT CARE!

“Y’all Were Riding That Jock.” Roland TORCHES Megyn Kelly’s Trump Remorse

Ep 21: Kevin Hart Protected Everyone Except His Own People DL Hughley DL Hughley

Thursday, May 28, 2026

Epstein survivor on Pam Bondi deposition: ‘Who is she protecting?’

Don Jr Caught RED HANDED doing the UNTHINKABLE

Trump’s ‘snake’ story is coming back to bite America

Lawrence: The tortured soul of Trump's lying & incompetent Treasury Secy. was on display again today

BREAKING: I Spoke to the Fmr. Federal Judges FIGHTING BACK Against Trump

'She’s definitely getting different or you could say favorable treatment': Fmr. Prosecutor on Bondi

Why the DOJ is Targeting Trump Accuser E. Jean Carroll

Controversy At 60 Minutes: Bari Weiss Latest

Trump PANICS as GOP TOWN HALL Goes OFF THE RAILS!!

Trump FAILS TO STOP Fmr. AG From TESTIFYING in Epstein Probe

Trump GOES MISSING after STRIKES LAUNCHED!!

Trump BLINDSIDED as ACTS SUDDENLY QUIT!!

Trump HUMILIATED After 35 Judges SOUND ALARM On His FRAUD!!

OH SH*T: Anderson Cooper Emotionally QUITS, Then Colleague INSTANTLY DOES TOO!

Trump BLINDSIDED by 35 JUDGE Filing…DECLARING “FRAUD ON THE COURT”

“It’s an odd choice”: NYT Reporter on the ballooning costs of Reflecting Pool renovations

Republican Revolt?

Inside Grindr's Secret Power Network in Trump's Washington

They’re LYING About Thomas Massie!

BREAKING: HISTORIC Corruption Exposed in Trump White House as Investigations Set to BEGIN

FURIOUS Judge DEMANDS Trump TURN OVER RECORDS NOW!!!

Another GOP Congressman TURNS ON TRUMP Over Slush Fund

FURIOUS World Leaders TURN THE SCREWS in Trump in NEW ALLIANCE

Leftists Want Voters To Vote For Cori Bush, But Here’s Why They May Not!!

Trump PANICS as US TROOPS EXPOSE Him IN THE ACT!!!

“This is not a legitimate perjury case”: Fmr. Prosecutor on E. Jean Carroll Investigation

Trump’s DARK PAST SURFACES at WORST TIME in HIS LIFE!!!!

 

The Snapshot

Thursday, May 28, 2026.  Chumps strikes Iran again, his slush fund is universally despised as is Todd Blanche, the economy remains in the toilet, and much more.










Iran said it had retaliated on Thursday against the United States by targeting an unnamed American base in response to strikes in southern Iran, escalating tensions amid negotiations to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and end the war.

In recent days, Washington and Tehran have suggested that they were close to agreeing on a narrow agreement to allow commercial shipping to resume in the strait. But on Wednesday, U.S. forces launched new strikes and President Trump reiterated that he did not want the waterway to be under Iranian control.

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards said on Thursday that it had targeted a base where the U.S. strikes originated but did not say where that was or how it had been attacked. The guards warned that further U.S. strikes would be met by an even “more decisive” response.

On Thursday morning, the Kuwaiti military said that its air defenses had intercepted hostile drones and missiles, but did not specify the origin or extent of the attack. The United States has five military bases in Kuwait.

Hours earlier, American forces conducted strikes in southern Iran, the second round of attacks this week. The United States knocked down four attack drones that a U.S. official said Iran had launched over the Strait of Hormuz.



Iran said it targeted an American airbase Thursday, a response to new U.S. attacks that it called a “blatant violation” of both the shaky ceasefire between the two countries and international law.

The latest military exchange, which appeared to draw in the United States’ ally of Kuwait, raised further doubts about diplomatic efforts to end the war and reopen the crucial Strait of Hormuz.

Hours earlier, President Donald Trump signaled an agreement between the two sides wasn’t close, and that he would not be rushed by either international economic pressure or the political pressure of upcoming midterm elections.  

Iran’s chokehold on the Strait of Hormuz — which it has effectively shut off in response to the U.S.-Israeli attack late February — has caused a global economic shock, with prices rising for oil, natural gas, fertilizer and other essential goods.

Trump also warned Oman, another U.S. ally in the region, against partnering with Iran to jointly control the Strait. “Oman will behave just like everybody else or we’ll have to blow them up,” he said during a Cabinet meeting, before adding, “They understand that. They’ll be fine.”


Chump is a con man, grifter and liar and he's assembled people like him to staff the administration.  Which is how we get Pete Hegseth and others who lie about the amount of weapons.  We called it out at the start of the Iran War -- they were running out of weapons.  Ben Finley (AP) reports now:

U.S. military contractors need at least three years to replenish stockpiles of three key weapons systems used heavily in the Iran war, according to an analysis released Wednesday, adding to concerns that American forces would have limited firepower in any future conflict with China.
The weapons systems are Tomahawk cruise missiles, which are used to strike targets deep inside enemy territory, and Patriot and THAAD interceptors that defend against incoming missiles and drones.

“The United States has enough munitions for any plausible scenario in the Iran war, but the depleted inventories have created a window of vulnerability for a potential Western Pacific conflict,” the Center for Strategic and International Studies said in its new report, provided to The Associated Press. “The time needed to rebuild those inventories has thus become a major concern.”


The US and Israel are "burning through" their supply of Tomahawk and interceptor missiles in their war on Iran, alarming some in the Pentagon.

According to officials speaking to the Washington Post, the US has fired more than 850 Tomahawk cruise missiles in four weeks of its war with Iran.

Only a few hundred of the cruise missiles are manufactured each year and while the Pentagon does not publicly disclose its numbers, one official told the news outlet the number of Tomahawks left in the Middle East is “alarmingly low”.

Tomahawks can travel more than 1,000 miles, which allows the US military to hit targets in Iran without sending pilots into a hostile airspace.

It has only gotten worse since then.  


And as Ben Finley notes in his new report, the issue is not money, the issue is the time it takes to manufacture Tomahawks.  


Chump can't focus on the war -- not even in a cabinet meeting.  David Edwards (RAW STORY) notes


President Donald Trump spent roughly 10 minutes of a high-stakes cabinet meeting on Wednesday — convened amid delicate negotiations to end the U.S. war with Iran — ranting about his efforts to renovate the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, falsely claiming predecessors wasted "hundreds of millions" on the landmark and repeatedly comparing it to a swimming pool.
"From 1922 on, it really never worked," Trump told cabinet members, calling the pool — which he repeatedly referred to as a "reflecting lake" — an embarrassment. "It was filthy dirty. It was Biden."

[. . .]
Trump claimed the project would cost "like $10,000,000, maybe $12,000,000." But federal records show the no-bid contract awarded to Atlantic Industrial Coatings — a Virginia firm Trump chose because it had worked on pools at his golf club — has already climbed to $13.1 million, more than seven times his original estimate of $1.8 million. Critics also note that Trump's plan does not address the pool's faulty filtration system, which has caused chronic leaks for decades.





Turning to Chump's slush fund, Malcolm Ferguson (THE NEW REPUBLIC) reports

GOP Representative Mike Flood had yet another disastrous town hall in Norfolk, Nebraska, on Tuesday, as his constituents drowned him out with grievances regarding the war on Iran, the White House ballroom, Jeffrey Epstein, and President Trump’s “anti-weaponization” slush fund.
[. . .]

The only thing Flood seemed to fully agree with the crowd on was Trump’s $1.8 billion slush fund—a shameless plan to direct billions of taxpayer dollars to Trump’s supporters who felt wronged or targeted by the Biden administration—even those who attacked Capitol Police on January 6.

“I do not think we should be creating a fund for people that commit physical violence against law enforcement,” he said. “The Senate is opening an oversight effort. And we in the House have to determine whether we do the same in the Judiciary Committee or in the Oversight Committee. I clearly think Congress needs to have an oversight role in this before I can sign off or support this.”

The slush fund is deeply unpopular.  With Americans period.  Alexander Willis (RAW STORY) notes:

President Donald Trump’s $1.7 billion “anti-weaponization fund” is even more disliked among voters than previously known, according to new internal GOP polling that has circulated among prominent GOP organizations “in recent days,” sending several Republican operatives into an all-out panic, Zeteo reported Wednesday.
“This could really f--- us,” a “well-connected national GOP consultant” told Zeteo, speaking on the condition of anonymity. “Why do you think everyone’s so upset?”
[. . .]
“Far too many Americans now view President Trump as corrupt, and that is going to be a significant hurdle for Republicans this year at a time when the voters want to be hearing about how you are making life easier and cheaper for them or how you’re making the country safe – not about a f------ ballroom,” said a former Trump administration official familiar with the internal polling, speaking with Zeteo on the condition of anonymity.

“This fund business just adds to that perception. And Donald Trump isn’t the one whose name is on the ballot this year, so he’s not going to be the one who really loses from his decisions or rhetoric.”


Chump shares the blame for this move with Acting Attorney General and Acting Fool Todd Blanche.  Blanche knows that Chump did not have grounds for a lawsuit.  As Dan Abrams pointed out early on in the discussion, Chump's IRS leak took place in his first term so, when he started saying he was going to sue this past January, the two year limit to file any kind of lawsuit had passed.  Chump got into trouble with a judge who questioned how he could sue the government and be the one deciding on settling with him?  He was the prosecutor and the defendant.  Then Chump announced he was withdrawing his lawsuit (which would not have been allowed to go through to begin with) and instead taking $1.776 billion for a fund that would be overseen by people picked out by Blanche and that Chump could fire at will who would award it to those poor January 6th insurrectionists who had faced trials and jail time for attacking the Capitol police and terrorizing Josh Hawley and assorted other members of Congress.  Oh, and the cherry on top, Chump and his family can never be audited by the IRS and any ongoing audits would cease.  Even the editorial board of THE NEW YORK POST is aghast, "The Trump Justice Department settlement of the Trump IRS lawsuit looks terrible.  A blanket guarantee that the prez and his family will never ever face an IRS audit? A $1.8 billon 'anti-weaponization fund,' courtesy of the taxpayers, to be doled out to people who claim they were victimized by Biden-era 'lawfare' -- with no evident need to even show evidence?" 


The shocker is that, suddenly, congressional Republicans have taken a stand against the madness that has infected the Justice Department (one strain of it, at least). Democrats — and virtually every other human with a brain and a pulse — were immediately outraged last week when the DoJ unveiled a $1.776 billion (get it? 1776??) “anti-weaponization” fund that would serve as a cash trough for January 6 rioters, including those who were convicted of seditious conspiracy and assaulted police officers, among others. Don’t fret, though. As Blanche confidently reassured CNN’s Paula Reid, “Just to be clear, people who hurt police get money all the time, okay?” (Okay, name one.)

But outrage from the minority party in Congress mostly generates rhetoric and headlines. It takes the party in power to actually do something. And late last week, initial tremors from congressional Republicans swelled into a full-blown earthquake. Republican Senate Majority Leader John Thune tiptoed cautiously at first toward dissent, noting that he was “not a big fan” of the fund and that “our members have very legitimate questions” about it. One of those members, Senator Thom Tillis, phrased it better: “I think it’s stupid on stilts.”


The situation devolved quickly for Blanche. The New York Times reported the acting AG’s frantic effort to reassure Senate Republicans — who may someday vote on his confirmation — went quite poorly. According to the Times, the meeting turned into “a two-hour blowup in which dozens of Republican senators vented their anger and concern about the president’s fund at Mr. Blanche. They questioned its legal basis, whom it would pay and how the process would work. And they made it clear they wanted no part of the plan, the product of a deal struck between Mr. Trump’s lawyers and his own administration.” Senator Ted Cruz confirmed that Republican lawmakers were “screaming” at Blanche and that the Trump administration’s slush fund could provoke “a full-on revolt in the Senate.”

Now Blanche finds himself in a tricky spot. He can’t stand behind the slush fund and still realistically hope to be confirmed by the Senate as attorney general, should he be nominated. Republicans hold a 53-47 edge, but already at least four Republican senators are on record against the fund in its current iteration. So Blanche will either have to stick with the scheme and sacrifice his own shot at the top job — unlikely, given that he has already shown he’ll do whatever it takes to advance — or have to back off. Whether that means modifying the plan or abandoning it altogether, it’s increasingly unlikely the slush fund will become reality as presently constituted.




Liz Oyer, former pardon attorney at the Justice Department, called it a criminal conspiracy. Former deputy U.S. solicitor general Philip Allen Lacovara wrote that it looks like “a classic example of a ‘collusive settlement,'” which is “a species of fraud” that “[m]ost typically … involve[s] self-interested deals in which a person with insurance agrees to settle a bogus claim or commits to an unreasonable payment in the home of foisting the costs on an insurance company.” 

And as Anna Bower and Eric Columbus of Lawfare noted, if payouts are made to Trump-aligned individuals and companies, including people pardoned for crimes associated with the riot at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, it could violate the Antideficiency Act, which makes “a federal crime to ‘knowingly and willfully‘ spend money not appropriated by Congress.”

Second, although Trump is operating as if he is above the law, there is room for future courts to find liability for “creative crimes” he commits while in the White House. In giving Trump criminal immunity for official acts in July of 2024, the Supreme Court made clear that former presidents can still be prosecuted for crimes involving unofficial acts. This could theoretically cover even actions taken by Trump to minimize his personal tax liability.

During Trump’s first term, even the friendly majority on the Supreme Court refused to protect his personal accounting firm from having to turn over his tax returns to a number of congressional committees. In 2022, it refused to block a lower court ruling that Trump must disclose his tax returns and other financial records to the House Ways and Means Committee.

Those decisions signal a potential willingness on the part of five justices to recognize a sliver of accountability for presidents even after their disastrous criminal immunity decision in Trump v. U.S.

Third, Trump’s self-serving deal for IRS immunity might not hold up in the long run. The real question right now is not whether Trump has the constitutional authority to grant himself tax immunity and extend it to his sons and his business (he doesn’t), but whether voters will one day elect an administration willing to bring cases ostensibly covered by the addendum. If that happens, Trump’s defense team would undoubtedly seek to have them thrown out under the terms of the addendum. In response, the government would argue that the addendum should be given no weight because Trump had no legal authority to grant himself such immunity in the first place. The whole thing is bogus, so any attempt to use it as a valid legal defense is bogus, too.






Blanche is infamous for saying "I love you, sir" to Chump.  Kiss up or latent behavior -- who knows?  But it's not the behavior of an Attorney General.  And, sadly, that's no longer one of the big problems facing Blanche.  Colin Kalmbacher (LAW & CRIME) reports:

Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche is now the subject of a bar complaint filed with authorities in New York, according to a nonprofit government watchdog that is requesting an investigation.

The 11-page complaint is premised on Blanche's role in the Trump administration's failed efforts to prosecute Kilmar Abrego Garcia for human smuggling in the Tennessee federal court system.
"Blanche's conduct potentially violated numerous Rules of Professional Conduct," the complaint reads. "Blanche's conduct in connection with the Abrego Garcia matter is a serious abuse of public office, undermines the integrity of the Department of Justice, and erodes public confidence in the legal profession and in the fair administration of justice."
Earlier this month, U.S. District Judge Waverly Crenshaw Jr., a Barack Obama appointee, determined the evidence before the court "sadly reflects an abuse of prosecuting power." The court went on to dismiss the indictment – finding the prosecution vindictive and selective.

"The Court does not reach its conclusion lightly," Crenshaw wrote in the memorandum opinion. "The objective evidence here shows that, absent Abrego's successful lawsuit challenging his removal to El Salvador, the Government would not have brought this prosecution."


Back to Chump's war of choice.  Senator Tammy Baldwin notes the impact this war is having on farmers:

WISCONSIN – Today, U.S. Senator Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) visited two farms in Janesville and Sharon to hear from Wisconsin farmers about how President Trump’s war of choice in Iran is jacking up the cost of fertilizer and fuel and hurting their operations. Senator Baldwin visited Rebout Farms in Janesville, Wisconsin, which raises 4,200 acres of corn, soybeans and wheat in Rock County, and Frontier Farms in Sharon, Wisconsin, which specializes in soybeans, corn, and winter wheat.

“Wisconsin farmers work hard to produce world-class products that feed the world and power our rural economies. On top of Donald Trump’s reckless trade war that shut off places to sell their products and jacked up costs, Wisconsin’s farmers are now paying record high costs for diesel and fertilizer in the middle of spring planting because of this illegal war in Iran,” said Senator Baldwin. “Today, I visited two Wisconsin farms to understand how Donald Trump’s war of choice has created even more headwinds for Wisconsin farmers. This much is clear: this war needs to end.” 

One-third?of the world’s fertilizer passes through the Strait of Hormuz, and since the attacks on the shipping lane, prices have gone up?25%. Diesel prices have?also?jumped?75%?in the last?three?months, dramatically increasing?farmers’?costs?to?operate?their machinery.?Senator Baldwin has?repeatedly forced votes?in the Senate to end Trump’s war in Iran that is hurting Wisconsin farmers, families, and servicemembers. Senator Baldwin also leads bipartisan legislation that would provide American producers with more accurate information on prices for fertilizer and fertilizer products in response to longstanding concerns over rising input costs.

###




As Americans confront a surge in prices at the pump, another inflation wave is headed for the grocery store.
A combination of factors including bad weather, tariffs and a dwindling cattle herd are already pushing up grocery prices at an above-average pace. In April, they rose by the most in nearly four years, and economists say the impact of the Iran war and a potential El Niño weather pattern will only add to pressures into 2027.

The hit to US household finances from higher grocery bills is set to intensify just ahead of the November midterm elections, amplifying affordability as a defining issue. And to a greater extent than the surge in gas prices, the slower-moving food shock will be difficult to reverse quickly because the size of autumn harvests is determined by planting decisions made in the spring.

“It’s going to be a challenging year,” said Ricky Volpe, an agribusiness professor at California Polytechnic State University who previously worked at the US Department of Agriculture’s Economic Research Service. “Food is going to become less affordable, and consumers should be prepared for it.”


Let's wind down with this from Senator Elizabeth Warren's office:

“If we overhaul our tax code and tax AI, we can use that money to build a country that works for everyone.”

“The American people deserve to share in the success of this technology.”

Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) published an op-ed in TIME making the case that any solution to the problems posed by AI must include taxing AI and investing in people.

Specifically, the senator calls for overhauling the rigged tax code, including by taxing the wealthy and making corporations pay their fair share, to ensure the economic gains from AI benefit all Americans. The senator also calls for a new tax on AI companies that would tax the energy usage of data centers powering AI.

Read the full op-ed here and below:

TIME - Why We Need to Tax AI
May 27, 2026 

Americans are hanging on by their fingernails in an economy that funnels wealth to the ultra-rich and leaves crumbs for working people. AI threatens to supercharge this divide: tech executives have warned that AI could lead to “a level of wealth concentration that will break society” and create a “permanent underclass.”

I refuse to accept that future. Building an economy that works for all of us will require multiple policy responses. But it starts by acknowledging: it’s time to tax AI and invest in people.

AI holds tremendous promise. At the same time, Americans are rightly concerned that AI could further rig our economy. The technology is creating dozens of tech billionaires, while companies are laying off workers in the name of AI. Meanwhile, AI data centers are jacking up utility bills; for families living near large data centers, electricity costs have skyrocketed by as much as 267% over the past five years. It’s no surprise that Americans are showing up at town meetings to protest data centers and communities across the country are fighting for data center moratoriums.

Big Tech CEOs say this is only the beginning, predicting that AI will soon automate most white-collar tasks. Yes, some of this may be hyperbole. But there is no denying that AI is already changing the labor market. And because health care is often tied to a job, an AI wave could cost a family more than a lost paycheck. Even those whose jobs and insurance remain intact could be hit: experts warn that the hype around AI is fueling a financial bubble that threatens another economic crash.

Policymakers undoubtedly need to regulate AI and protect against its worst-case harms, like cyber attacks, which could impact our financial system and national security. We must also tackle the problem of AI’s accelerating demand for energy and ensure that families’ utility bills don’t skyrocket. And we need greater scrutiny of the murky world of private credit that finances a big chunk of AI deals so they don’t topple our economy.

But any response to a looming AI crisis must also tackle our rigged tax code.

Taxing AI is one way we make sure the winnings from AI benefit all Americans, rather than channeling them only to the wealthy few. If millions of people lose their jobs to AI, we’ll need the funds to deliver universal health care so those workers are not bankrupted by a visit to the doctor. If AI transforms the future of work, we'll need to invest in free education and apprenticeships and a new jobs guarantee so that all Americans have good-paying work. And while workers get back on their feet, we’ll need the revenue to bolster unemployment insurance to keep families afloat. The only way we can get there is by overhauling our tax code.

We can start by making corporations pay their fair share. Right now, companies pay payroll taxes for their workers but get tax breaks for investing in technology—effectively, a tax penalty for hiring human beings and a tax break for buying equipment. In an AI world, that means our tax code is incentivizing corporations to fire people and replace them with AI. That’s wrong. We need to level the playing field by raising taxes on corporations and capital gains and closing corporate loopholes. One way to tackle those loopholes? Strengthen the minimum tax for billionaire corporations, which I helped pass into law.

But there’s more. Some of the wealthiest individuals in America get away with paying lower tax rates than a Boston public school teacher because our system taxes income but not wealth. AI billionaires are running the same playbook: get rich off massive stock valuations and avoid paying the taxes that would be owed if those funds were earned as salary. If it wasn’t clear before, there’s no question in a world of AI: we need a wealth tax. Jeff Bezos and Sam Altman shouldn’t pay lower tax rates than the workers they fire.

Rethinking our tax code must also include going to the source: that means taxing AI companies directly, which can start with taxing AI data centers. The majority of AI data centers are controlled or operated by trillion-dollar companies. By imposing a reasonable excise tax on the energy used by data centers, families could recoup some of the gains of AI, while America continues to stay competitive in the AI race. A well-designed tax would focus on the companies that can afford it and scale with AI’s impact: the bigger the data center, the more they pay.

We can't be afraid to consider even bigger and bolder proposals to tax AI too, including ideas that sound radical today but may quickly become common sense. Because here’s what I see clearly: if we overhaul our tax code and tax AI, we can use that money to build a country that works for everyone. A country where health care is treated as a human right, where every American is guaranteed a good job, and where education isn’t a privilege reserved for the wealthy. That’s what I believe taxing AI promises.

AI was trained on human creativity and intelligence, AI was funded in part by federal investments in scientific research, and AI is powered by data centers that are built on American land and use our shared electric grid. The American people deserve to share in the success of this technology. And I’m willing to work with anyone to get it done.

###


The following sites -- plus Ruth's "Chump's grift entitled The Board of Peace" and Elaine's "Who is Chump sleeping with?" -- updated: