Sunday, March 16, 2014

Hejira

At a time when Nouri al-Maliki is committing legally defined War Crimes in Anbar Province (most specifically with the use of collective punishment), the US Embassy in Baghdad proudly announces the US government continues to arm him:

March 16, 2014
The United States continues to accelerate delivery of weapons and ammunition to Iraq consistent with our Strategic Framework Agreement and long-term security partnership. These deliveries are made in response to specific Iraqi requests and pursuant to a holistic counter-terrorism policy that incorporates political, economic, and security measures. On the security side, it is essential that Iraqi Security Forces (ISF) are equipped with modern and effective weaponry given the serious threat the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) now poses to Iraq and the region.
The United States is determined to help the ISF respond to this threat and protect the population in coordination with local leaders and tribes. Earlier this month, the United States delivered nearly 100 Hellfire missiles together with hundreds of thousands of rounds of ammunition and M4 rifles. These deliveries addressed a critical assessment of needs conducted jointly by Iraq and U.S. security experts, and were the latest in a series of deliveries bringing critical supplies to Iraq.
Since mid-January, more than eleven million rounds of ammunition, thousands of machine guns, sniper rifles, M16s and M4 rifles, thousands of flares, grenades and other weapons have been delivered to the ISF. Additional deliveries are scheduled in coming weeks, pursuant to the U.S. Foreign Military Sales program with attendant transparency and accountability measures.

The United States looks forward to working closely with Iraqi leaders and military commanders to determine and address additional critical equipment needs over the coming weeks. We will also continue to encourage all Iraqi leaders to work together to effectively implement the holistic counter-terrorism strategy in Anbar province, as reflected in the Council of Ministers February 18 program – with a focus on mobilizing the population against ISIL and other extremist groups.


As Human Rights Watch's Erin Evers noted in "US Missing the Boat on Halting Iraq Arms Sales:"

The US has long supported the Iraqi government with arms, though the Iraqi government has committed serious, widespread abuses against its own people in the name of counterterrorism. That has proven ineffective in combating terrorism but has stoked resentment. Psaki acknowledged that the US has “providedthe Iraqi military and security forces with more than $15 billion in equipment, services, and training,” and recently delivered to Iraq “Hellfire missiles and hundreds of small arms along with large quantities of small arms and tank ammunition,” but did not address the copious evidence giving cause for concern that Iraq will use these weapons to continue abuses.
The State Department’s own 2012 Human Rights report noted that “Human rights violations committed by [Iraqi Security Forces] personnel were rarely investigated, and perpetrators were seldom punished,” and that the government “did not take widespread action to reform security forces to improve human rights.”
The new Human Rights Watch research about the treatment of women in Iraq’s criminal justice system, for example, shows that security forces frequently subject detained women to torture and ill-treatment, including the threat of sexual abuse. In early January, Anbar residents told us that the army’s mortar fire on residential neighborhoods had killed at least 25 residents in the first few days of fighting in Fallujah.

In November, we documented how Iraqi security forces, including agents from Special Weapons and Tactics [SWAT] in the Counterterrorism Service [CTS]—precisely the security forces who, along with the army, are at the forefront of the fighting in Anbar—abused residents by surrounding and closing off majority Sunni neighborhoods, illegally raiding homes and carrying out mass arrests. Since 2010 we have repeatedly reported that security forces including SWAT, Federal Police, and the army use unlawful force against peaceful protesters; carry out illegal arrests, interrogations, and detentions, and systematically use torture during interrogations.


But the US government overlooks the laws, domestic and international, to continue funding thug Nouri.

The alleged purpose of the assault on Nouri was to confront the violence killing so many Iraqis.

(All pretend not to notice that Baghdad had more violence in 2013 than Ramadi.)

It has failed to do so.

Through Saturday, Iraq Body Count counts 496 violent deaths.

The violence isn't ending.

Today it continues.   National Iraqi News Agency reports a suicide car bomber in Hammam al-Aleedl took his own life and the lives of 2 police members and 1 military officer while leaving six more people injured, a suicide car bomber "south of Mosul" took his own life and the life of 1 Iraqi soldier while leaving three more soldiers injured, a Tuz Khurmatu roadside bombing left nine people injured, a Mosul battle left 2 police members dead, an Abu Ghraib sticky bombing left 1 person dead, Joint Operations Command announced they killed 4 suspects "near Fallujah," a Qudis battle left 2 Iraqi soldiers dead, a Meshahda sticky bombing left 2 Sahwa dead, 1 person was shot dead in Kazimiyah, 1 Iraqi soldier was shot dead in Bob al-Sham, 1 "member of the Intelligence" was shot dead in Abu Ghraib, and 3 corpses were discovered dumped in Diyala River ("gunshots in different parts of their bodies").  All Iraq News adds that 3 corpses were discovered dumped in the Euphrates river, 1 truck driver was shot dead in Basra.


All Iraq News reports:

The United States of America expressed its readiness to mediate between the Federal Government and Kurdistan Regional Government to settle the disputes related to 2014 State Budget.

The media office of the Second Deputy Premier of KRG, MP Arif Tayfur, of the Kurdistani Alliance reported in a statement received by AIN "Tayfur hosted the US Deputy Assistant Secretary for Iraq and Iran Affairs, Brett Macrik, and his accompanying delegation at his office where they discussed the recent political situations in Iraq and regional arena.''



How's that going to help?

Am I wrong -- and I well may be -- but is Tuesday not the final reading of this bill to Parliament?

So despite weeks and weeks of objections from many blocs in Parliament -- most famously the Kurds -- the US government says it can get involved just as time runs out?








I'm traveling in some vehicle
I'm sitting in some cafe
A defector from the petty wars
That shell shock love away
-- "Hejira," written by Joni Mitchell, first appears on her album of the same name

 The number of US service members the Dept of Defense states died in the Iraq War is [PDF format warning] 4489.

On this week's Law and Disorder Radio,  an hour long program that airs Monday mornings at 9:00 a.m. EST on WBAI and around the country throughout the week, hosted by attorneys Heidi Boghosian, Michael S. Smith and Michael Ratner (Center for Constitutional Rights) topics  addressed include the illegal spying, the war on Ukraine with Ajamu Baracka,  and professor Mark Taylor discusses the nomination of Dego Adegbile -- but probably won't do so honestly, honest requires noting it was a stupid nomination.


It was a stupid nomination.

I believe Mumia is innocent.  And I take a lot of crap for that belief.  So I'm fully aware that, though I believe he's innocent, a number of people disagree.

This makes Dego Adegbile a controversial nominee.

One that was not going to pass.  Democrats and Republicans are opposed to Adegbile and, in an election year, it's not just individual Democratic senators up for re-election that are nervous, party leaders are nervous.

It was a stupid move and it needs to be called that.

It was going to be an iffy nomination in a non-election year but in a mid-term election?

I don't feels sorry for the Dems that people are saying they may lose control of the Senate.

They've failed use their power while they've been in charge of it.  They've failed to fight for the people.

But even I wouldn't have tossed a controversial nominee like this to them during an election year.

They have no spine, they have no backbone.  This is not a new discovery.

So it was stupid and hurtful for Barack to nominate Adegbile.

Repeating, I believe Mumia Abu Jabal is innocent.

But I don't lie to myself that even 50% of America agrees with my belief on that.  A lot of work and raising awareness has allowed the numbers to increase.

And then this happens.

And the hosts probably don't even get how this hurts Mumia.

Because it does.

It gives a new sense of outrage to those who want to keep Mumia behind bars.

The opponents of releasing Mumia had nothing but old and tired arguments.

And now Barack tosses out fresh meat to anger this crowd.

It doesn't help Mumia one bit.

We're still working on Third.

The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.






 













Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Brett McGurk’s Remarks Iraq Counterterrorism Conference


From June 7, 2012, this is Isaiah's The World Today Just Nuts "Standing Behind McGurk" from back in the days when the White House was insisting that they would stand behind Brett McGurk and his nomination to be US Ambassador to Iraq.


standing behind mcgurk

Stephen Beecroft became the US Ambassador to Iraq instead.   Brett is now a point person on Iraq for the State Dept.  Nouri's 2-day failed conference ended Thursday.  This is the speech Brett delivered.




Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Brett McGurk’s Remarks Iraq Counterterrorism Conference

March 12, 2014
Introduction


Prime Minister Maliki, Foreign Minister Zebari, Mr. Chief Justice, Deputy Prime Ministers, parliamentarians, ministers, ambassadors, distinguished participants, thank you for inviting me to speak this morning.
At the outset, on behalf of the United States, I would like to express my heartfelt condolences for the thousands of Iraqis who have lost their lives in acts of terror and extremism over the past decade. I would also like to commemorate the hundreds of thousands of Americans who fought here, many of whom died here, or were wounded here, to give Iraq and its people a chance to build a better future.


Our partnership with Iraq – which, under the Strategic Framework Agreement, is permanent – was built on this shared purpose and sacrifice. We will never forget those who have lost their lives, and we all must continue to work to provide aid and comfort to those who have been wounded in body and spirit. It is pursuant to this shared sacrifice that we now confront together the many challenges before us – first and foremost, the challenge of international terrorism and its impact on Iraq.


In my brief remarks, I would like to define the challenge from terrorism in Iraq; the strategy for combatting it; and the international response that is required.


Defining the Challenge – ISIL


Terrorism in all of its forms and manifestations constitutes one of the most serious threats to international peace and security. And in Iraq, the government and people are confronting one of the most serious terrorist threats in the world. Foremost among these threats is the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).
ISIL is well known to the United States. It is a manifestation of al Qa’ida in Iraq (AQI), which was led shortly after the fall of Saddam Hussein by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. Zarqawi launched a sectarian campaign of mass murder in Iraq, fueled by suicide attacks against population centers, prominent clerics, and holy places.



Together, the Government and people of Iraq, with support from the United States, degraded AQI to the extent that it no longer posed a serious threat to the stability of the Iraqi state. Today, however, AQI – through ISIL and its other offshoot, the al-Nusrah front in Syria – is seeking resurgence in the region.



These networks constitute a direct threat to the region and to the entire world. Here in Iraq, vehicle and suicide bombs have risen steadily over the past 14 months, nearly all of them attributable to ISIL. Suicide bombs in particular are a primary tactic used by ISIL to instill fear in the population and take innocent life, targeting markets, restaurants, mosques, and even playgrounds.


We assess that nearly all of the 30 suicide bombers per month in Iraq are foreign fighters who enter Iraq from Syria. Just last week, ISIL boasted about attacks north of Baghdad by suicide bombers from countries across the Middle East region and in Europe. In short, this is an acute international crisis, requiring a coordinated and comprehensive response at the local, national, regional, and international level.


Define the Strategy – Holistic


Here in Iraq, ISIL’s strategy is to collapse state authority, create a vacuum, and establish a self-governing safe haven from which to expand operations throughout the region. It is attacking Sunnis, Shias, Kurds, Christians, Turkmen, Yazidis, Shabaks – all in an effort to tear the delicate fabric of this ancient land.
This is clear proof that ISIL takes innocent life regardless of identity or politics – and sectarian or political divisions must never be an excuse for terrorist acts. At the same time, all of those responsible for combatting terrorism must strive to create a political context and environment that deprives terrorists of oxygen.


In this regard, the United States has encouraged the Government of Iraq to develop a holistic strategy to isolate ISIL from the population. This requires a combination of political, security, economic, and cultural measures – focused on mobilizing the population from the bottom-up to protect local communities and force terrorist groups into non-populated areas where they can be captured and killed.


We know how difficult it can be to synchronize political, security, and economic measures – but this is the only strategy that will work over the long-term. In this regard, we are encouraged by the 13-point plan enacted on by Iraq’s Council of Ministers on February 18. Among other things, this plan calls for:




  • Incorporating 10,000 fighters from local tribes into the security structure of the state to protect the local population;
  • Allocating $17 million for families displaced from the fighting and now residing outside of Anbar province;
  • Allocating $17 million for those internally displaced within Anbar province;
  • Allocating nearly $1 million for restoring damaged property; and,
  • Addressing local grievances through an inclusive political process.


The United States will continue to work with the Government of Iraq to encourage rapid and effective implementation of this program. We will also encourage all Iraqi leaders to build a united and national front against ISIL – comprising local leaders and national leaders, especially during this season of elections.
We will further call on the Government and the entire international community to support the heroic efforts of UNAMI in responding to the humanitarian situation in Anbar province and ensure that those displaced from fighting are cared for, and ultimately able to return to their homes once the fighting is over.


Finally, the United States will continue to provide security assistance to the Iraqi forces who are bravely confronting ISIL in the field. We know as well as anyone how difficult this enemy can be, and our experts assess that ISIL is better funded, better armed, and better trained, than the AQI that we confronted years ago.



U.S. assistance includes weapons and security equipment – which we have surged since the first of the year – information sharing, operational advice, and military training. This support, provided pursuant to our Strategic Framework Agreement and in line with a holistic strategy, will be ongoing and steadfast.


We will also continue to note when tactics are counter-productive. In Anbar province, for example, defeating ISIL will require methodical, synchronized, and patient efforts. ISIL and other extremists will only gain from missteps, such as imprecise operations, indiscriminate arrests, or mobilization of militia groups.


Accordingly, we are encouraged that the Government of Iraq has reiterated its commitment to the approach outlined in the February 18 Council of Ministers’ resolution: to mobilize the local population in the fight against ISIL, and to avoid tactics that might further exacerbate the security situation.


Pursuant to this plan, the United States will stand with the Government and people of Iraq as they work to isolate ISIL and restore stability to populated areas.


Regional Situation


Iraq cannot operate in isolation from the region, and the ongoing conflict in Syria continues to have a dangerously destabilizing impact on Iraq. Syria is now an incubator of extremism on both sides of the sectarian divide. But this conflict is not primarily a clash between the Shia and Sunni branches of Islam – rather, it is a clash between extremists within each branch, and the vast majority of moderates who seek to realize the promise of economic and political modernization.


The United States stands strongly on the side of moderates on all sides, and we seek to work with the international community to isolate extremists regardless of sectarian affiliation. Indeed, we have absolutely no interest in taking sides in a sectarian contest, whether in Syria, Iraq, or anywhere else in the region.


As President Obama has stated:  “What we are trying to do is take sides against extremists of all sorts and in favor of people who are in favor of moderation, tolerance, representative government, and over the long term, stability and prosperity for the people of Syria.”


In pursuit of that objective, we renew the call to all regional states and throughout the world to police and deter the travel of anyone seeking to fight in Syria. These foreign fighters, if they are not killed in Syria, will inevitably return home, or travel to neighboring states – especially Iraq – to conduct acts of terrorism.


There is now an international consensus, backed by the UN Security Council in Resolution 2139 which, among other things: “demands that all foreign fighters immediately withdraw from Syria” regardless of cause or affiliation.


In line with this Security Council demand, we hope that Iraq can take actively deter its young people from fighting in Syria on either side of the conflict. This young generation is desperately needed in Iraq to rebuild its own country. 


Finally, we will continue to encourage Iraq and all states in the region to strictly adhere to UN Security Council Resolutions regarding the transit of weapons to terrorist groups, or to and from designated states; the financing of international terrorist networks; the transit of terrorist leaders across borders, or their safe haven within borders; and media incitement or glorification of terrorist acts.


Conclusion


Iraq faces enormous challenges over the months ahead but we must never lose sight of the potential. In Iraq today, Sunnis, Shia, Christians, and Kurds, are engaged daily in a democratic political process, interacting with one another peacefully – albeit, sometimes, noisily – to resolve extremely difficult issues.


Terrorist groups for ten years have sought to ensure this democratic experiment failed – but thus far, it is they who have failed. Iraq now faces a general election in six weeks, and with support from the United States, the United Nations, and the rest of the world, we can help the Iraqi people continue on their democratic path, and defeat once and for all the terrorists groups who seek to derail it.



Thank you again for the opportunity to address this conference, and I look forward to the discussions to come.















UChicago Neo-Nazi Neo-Cons: Obama, Nuland & Ukraine (Francis A. Boyle)


 Francis A. Boyle is an attorney and a professor of international law.  He's also the author of many books including, most recently, United Ireland, Human Rights and International Law.


UChicago Neo-Nazi Neo-Cons: Obama, Nuland & Ukraine

 by Francis A. Boyle

It is now a matter of public record that immediately after the terrible tragedy of 11 September 2001, U.S. Secretary of War Donald Rumsfeld and his pro-Israeli Neo-Conservative Deputy Paul Wolfowitz began to plot, plan, scheme and conspire to wage a war of aggression against Iraq by manipulating the tragic events of September 11th in order to provide a pretext for doing so. Of course Iraq had nothing at all to do with September 11th or supporting Al-Qaeda. But that made no difference to Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, their Undersecretary of War Douglas Feith, and the numerous other pro-Israeli Neo-Cons inhabiting the Bush Jr. administration.
 
 
 
              These pro-Israeli Neo-Cons had been schooled in the
Machiavellian/Hobbist/Nietzschean theories of Professor Leo Strauss who taught political philosophy at the University of Chicago in its Department of Political Science for many years. The best exposé of Strauss's pernicious theories on law, politics, government, for elitism, and against democracy can be found in two scholarly books by the Canadian Professor of Political Philosophy Shadia B. Drury: The Political Ideas of Leo Strauss (1988); Leo Strauss and the American Right (1999). I entered the University of Chicago in September of 1968 shortly after Strauss had retired. But I was trained in Chicago's Political Science Department by Strauss's foremost protégé, co-author, and later literary executor Joseph Cropsey.


 
Based upon my personal experience as an alumnus of Chicago's Political Science Department (A.B., 1971, in Political Science), I concur completely with Professor Drury's devastating critique of Strauss. I also agree with her penetrating analysis of the degradation of the American political process that has been inflicted by Chicago's Straussian Neo-Con cabal. Strauss was a protégé of Nazi Law Professor Carl Schmitt, who justified every hideous
atrocity that Hitler and the Nazis inflicted on anyone, including the Jews.
Chicago’s Neo-Cons are Neo-Nazis.


 
            The University of Chicago routinely trained me and innumerable other students to become ruthless and unprincipled Machiavellians. That is precisely why so many neophyte Neo-Con students gravitated towards the University of Chicago or towards Chicago Alumni at other universities. Years later, the University of Chicago became the "brains" behind the Bush Jr. Empire and his Ashcroft Police State. Attorney General John Ashcroft received his law degree from the Neo-Con University of Chicago Law School in 1967. 

Many of his lawyers at the Bush Jr. Department of Injustice were members of the right-wing, racist, bigoted, reactionary, elitist, war-mongering, and
totalitarian Federalist Society (A.K.A.:"Feddies"), which originated in part at
the Neo-Con University of Chicago Law School. There Barack Obama would teach constitutional law. Feddies wrote the USA Patriot Act (USAPA) I and the draft for USAPA II, which constitute the blueprints for establishing an American
Police State. Meanwhile, the Department of Injustice's own F.B.I. is still
covering up the U.S. governmental origins of the post 11 September 2001 anthrax attacks on Washington D.C. that enabled Ashcroft and his Feddies to stampede the U.S. Congress into passing USAPA I into law.
 

           Integrally related to and overlapping with the Feddies are members of the
University of Chicago Law School Movement of Law-and-Kick-Them-in-the-Groin-Economics, which in turn was founded upon the Market Fundamentalism of Milton Friedman, now deceased  but long-time Professor of
Economics at the University of Chicago. Friedman and his "Chicago Boys" have raped, robbed, looted, plundered, and pillaged economies and their respective peoples all over the developing world, especially People of Color, and now here in the United States. This Chicago gang of academic con-artists and charlatans are proponents of the Nazi Doctrine of "useless eaters" that was condemned by the Nuremberg Judgment (1946). Pursuant to Friedman's philosophy of Market Fundamentalism, the "privatization" of Iraq and its Oil Industry are already underway for the primary benefit of the U.S. energy companies (e.g., Halliburton , formerly under Bush Jr.'s Vice President Dick Cheney) that had already interpenetrated the Bush Jr. administration as well as the Bush Family itself. Enron.
 


           Although miseducated at Yale and Harvard Business School, the "Ivies" proved to be too liberal for Bush Jr. and his fundamentalist Christian supporters, whose pointman and spear-carrier in the Bush Jr. administration was Ashcroft, a Fundie himself. The Neo-Cons and the Fundies contracted an "unholy alliance" in support of Bush Jr. For their own different reasons, both gangs also worked hand-in-hand to support Israel's genocidal Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, an internationally acknowledged war criminal.


 
According to his own public estimate and boast in a 26 February 2003 speech before the American Enterprise Institute (another front-organization for
Straussian Neo-Cons), President Bush Jr. hired about 20 Straussians to occupy
key positions in his administration, intentionally taking offices where they
could push American foreign policy in favor of Israel and against its chosen
enemies such as Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, and the Palestinians. Most of the
Straussian Neo-Cons in the Bush Jr. administration and elsewhere were and still are Israel-firsters: What is "good" for Israel is by definition "good" for the
United States. Dual loyalties indeed. These same principles hold true for the
not-so-closet Neo-Cons in the Obama administration: e.g., Rahm Emanuel, Larry Summers, Elena Kagan, Dennis Ross, Cass Sunstein (married to Samantha Power), Victoria Nuland, etc.
 


           In addition, it was the Chicago Straussian cabal of pro-Israeli Neo-Cons who set up a special "intelligence" unit within the Pentagon that was responsible for manufacturing many of the bald-faced lies, deceptions, half-truths, and sheer propaganda that the Bush Jr. administration then disseminated to the lap-dog U.S. news media in order to generate public support for a war of aggression against Iraq for the benefit of Israel and in order to steal Iraq's oil. To paraphrase advice Machiavelli once rendered to his Prince in Chapter XVIII of that book: Those who want to deceive will always find those willing to be deceived. As I can attest from my personal experience as an alumnus of the University of Chicago Department of Political Science, the Bible of Chicago's Neo-Con Straussian cabal is Machiavelli's The Prince. We students had to know our Machiavelli by heart and rote at the University of Chicago.
 


           As for the University of Chicago overall, its New Testament is Allan Bloom's The Closing of the American Mind (1987). Of course Bloom was another protégé of Strauss (and thus the intellectual grandson of Nazi Law Professor Carl Schmitt), as well as a mentor to Wolfowitz. In his Bloom-biographical novel Ravelstein (2000) Saul Bellow, longtime member of the University of Chicago Faculty, outed his self-styled friend Bloom as a hedonist, pederast, and most promiscuous homosexual who died of AIDS. All this was common knowledge at the University of Chicago, where Bloom was and is still worshiped on a pedestal and his elitist screed against democratic education in America still revered as gospel truth.
 

In Ravelstein Wolfowitz appeared as Bloom's protégé Philip Gorman, leaking national security secrets to his mentor during the Bush Sr. war against Iraq.  Strauss hovered around the novel as Bloom's mentor and guru Professor Davarr.  Strauss/Davarr is really the eminence grise of Ravelstein. With friends like Bellow, Bloom did not need enemies. On the basis of Ravelstein alone, Wolfowitz warranted criminal investigation by the F.B.I.
 


Immediately after the Bush Jr. administrations wanton aggression against Iraq, the University of Chicago chose the occasion to officially celebrate its
Straussian Neo-Con cabal responsible therefore, highlighting Wolfowitz Ph.D.
'72, Ahmad Chalabi, Ph.D. '69 (the CIA's Iraqi puppet), Abram Shulsky, A.M. '68, Ph.D. '72 (head of the Pentagon's special "intelligence" unit), Zalmay
Khalilzad, Ph.D. '79 (Bush Jr.'s roving pro-consul for Afghanistan and then
Iraq), as well as faculty members Bellow, X '39, and Bloom, A.B. '49, A.M. '53,
Ph.D. '55, together with Strauss. According to the June 2003 University of
Chicago Magazine, Bloom's rant "helped popularize Straussian ideals of
democracy." It is correct to assert that Bloom's book helped to popularize
Straussian "ideas," but they were blatantly anti-democratic, Machiavellian,
Hobbist, Nietzschean, and elitist to begin with. Only the University of Chicago
would have the unmitigated Orwellian gall to publicly assert that Strauss and
Bloom cared one whit about democracy, let alone comprehended the "ideals of
democracy."
 


Does anyone seriously believe that a pro-Israeli Chicago/Strauss/Bloom product such as Wolfowitz could care less about democracy in the United States let alone in Iraq? Or for that matter anyone in the Bush Jr. administration? After they stole the 2000 presidential election from the American People in Florida and before the Republican-controlled U.S. Supreme Court, some of whom were/are Feddies? Justice Clarence Thomas is a Straussian to boot. For eight years the Neo-Cons, Fundies, Feddies, and Con-Artists of the Bush Jr. administration did everything humanly possible to build an American Police State. So far University of Chicago Constitutional Law Teacher President Barack Obama has failed and refused to deconstruct and dismantle their totalitarian handiwork. To the contrary, the Obama administration has defended and justified in court almost every hideous atrocity that the Bush Jr. administration perpetrated on international law, human rights, civil rights, civil liberties, the U.S. Constitution, and the Bill of Rights.
 


At the behest of its Straussian Neo-Con Political Science Department, in 1979 the entire University of Chicago went out of its way to grant the "first Albert Pick Jr. Award for Outstanding Contributions to International Understanding" to Robert McNamara, who was personally responsible for exterminating 3 million Vietnamese and 58,000 men of my generation. In other words, the University of Chicago itself maliciously strove to rehabilitate one of the greatest international war criminals in the post-World War II era. History shall always record that the University of Chicago gratuitously honored Bob
Half-an-Eichmann McNamara.
 


Do not send your children to the University of Chicago where they will grow up to become warmongers like Wolfowitz and totalitarians like Ashcroft and politicians like Obama! The University of Chicago is an intellectual and moral cesspool. As J.D. Rockefeller, the Original Robber Baron and Funder of the University of Chicago once commented about his progeny: “It’s the best investment I ever made.”  Still is.
 


 
Francis A. Boyle
Law Building
504 E. Pennsylvania Ave.
Champaign, IL 61820 USA