Tuesday, October 28, 2025

The Snapshot

Tuesday, October 28, 2025.  Chump's shutdown continues as he flames out in Japan, ICE continues to attack the people, the economy is tanking and so much more.


Let's wake up with Ben's news for the morning.


Last night, Trina also noted Donald Chump's attack on the American people while he's giving money to Argentina:




The U.S. Department of Agriculture has posted a notice on its website saying federal food aid will not go out on Nov. 1, raising the stakes for families nationwide as the government shutdown drags on.

The new notice comes after the Trump administration said it would not tap roughly $5 billion in contingency funds to keep benefits through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, commonly referred to as SNAP, flowing into November. That program helps about 1 in 8 Americans buy groceries.

But he can give our money -- our tax dollars -- to Argentina (at least $20 billion, possibly $40 billion).  You cover your house bills first.  You have money after that, give it to charity, help a friend, donate it, whatever.  But you have to pay your own bills first. 

USDA -- I believe in violation of The Hatch Act -- tries to blame this on Democrats.

No, this is Chump's shutdown.  He's the president.  Republicans also control the House and Senate.  This is their shutdown.  Democrats are the only ones fighting for We The People and they are fighting to stop cuts to healthcare that will make all of our monthly premiums soar.  Chump and the GOP (other than Marjorie Taylor Greene) don't care about that.  They're more focused on Chump's tax cuts for the extremely wealthy.



Great news for vegans: The cost of beef has skyrocketed, and President Donald Trump has made American cattle ranchers hoof-stomping mad with policies that appear decidedly America-last.

While U.S. consumers wrestle with record-high ground beef prices – $6.63 per pound in August, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics – and steak restaurants boost prices, Trump has proposed helping his far-right, Trump-like pal, Argentine President Javier Milei, by quadrupling the amount of Argentine beef coming into America.

That would likely do little to help consumers, while hurting cattle ranchers already struggling with a reduced domestic herd size brought on by everything from drought to inflated feeding costs. 

The National Cattlemen’s Beef Association CEO Colin Woodall called out Trump’s pro-Argentina plan in no uncertain terms: “This plan only creates chaos at a critical time of the year for American cattle producers, while doing nothing to lower grocery store prices. … Argentina also has a history of foot-and-mouth disease, which, if brought to the United States, could decimate our domestic livestock production.”

I generally place anything involving foot-and-mouth disease in the “bad” category.

Cattle ranchers don't like it.  Mike Davis (WITCHITA EAGLE) notes:


President Donald Trump has proposed importing beef from Argentina amid efforts to ease food prices and inflation driven by drought and livestock disease. Agricultural leaders have criticized the plan, warning it could undermine the domestic cattle industry. Sen. Deb Fischer (R-NE) said the move would harm ranchers vital to Nebraska’s economy.
Producer groups have argued that expanding imports rather than supporting domestic production could worsen financial strain for cattle operations already facing volatile markets.
Trump said, "We would buy some beef from Argentina." He added, "If we do that, that will bring our beef prices down."
Fischer wrote, "I’ve also been sounding the alarm on the bleak state of our ag economy and the negative impacts facing Nebraska’s ag industry—the economic driver of our state." She added, "Bottom line: if the goal is addressing beef prices at the grocery store, this isn’t the way. Right now, government intervention in the beef market will hurt our cattle ranchers."


Yesterday, US Senator Ruben Gallego issued the following:

WASHINGTON – Today, Senator Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) and 15 Senate colleagues wrote to U.S. Trade Representative Ambassador Greer calling out the Trump administration’s harmful and undeveloped plan to import more beef from Argentina, which will harm American ranchers.  

“We write in strong opposition to the Administration’s undeveloped plan to increase imports of Argentinian beef,” the Senators wrote. “This announcement has already had tangible market impacts felt by cattle producers across the country, at a time when cattle producers are looking for long-term stability to rebuild their herds. Rather than reward Argentina’s president and agricultural producers, we encourage you to focus on policies that support American farmers and ranchers and that bring down costs for all Americans.”

To meaningfully lower prices for American families, the Senators called on the Trump Administration to end the chaotic, across-the-board tariffs that are driving market instability and increasing costs.  

“In addition, we are concerned that this plan could also introduce serious animal health threats that further cripple U.S. cattle production at a time of low cattle supply…” they continued. “…these animal health threats would pose severe risks to U.S. livestock production, disrupt domestic and international trade, and have far-reaching economic consequences across rural communities and the agricultural supply chain.”

“Instead of introducing additional volatility into the market, we urge you to implement a trade policy that uses targeted tariffs and other tools to ensure U.S. producers can fairly compete in the global marketplace while also ensuring Americans have access to healthy, affordable foods,” the Senators concluded.

Read the full letter HERE.    

Last week, Senator Gallego called on Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to reconsider further aid to Argentina and focus instead on restoring and expanding export markets for U.S. farmers.

10/27/25


He's pissing off the ranchers and the farmers, pretty much everyone.  Now in a Bush administration or a Ford administration or a Reagan administration, this is where a cabinet member would stand up and say to the American people, "I feel your pain."  And they might be believed.  But all chump has is millionaires so they just look ridiculous. 


Scott Bessent—worth an estimated $600 million according to Forbes—wasn’t well-received when he identified himself as a fellow soybean farmer suffering under China’s boycott.

The Secretary of the Treasury appeared on This Week Sunday, and spoke to host Martha Raddatz about the U.S. relationship with China alongside the impacts of tariffs, and shared that he related with the struggles of the working man more than people realized.

Predictably, the former hedge fund manager’s self-identification as “actually a soybean farmer” wasn’t lapped up by the masses, who were quick to fact check him online.

Talking about how President Trump has stated his wish to see “our farmers to be taken care of,“ Raddatz added: “China has been boycotting American soybeans and American farmers have really suffered.”

She asked: “Do you see a real light at the end of the tunnel there, they may allow soybeans again?”

Multimillionaire Bessent earnestly responded: “Well, Martha, in case you don’t know it, I’m actually a soybean farmer. So, I have—I have felt this pain, too.”


And the country erupted in laugher.



As Stephanie Ruhle pointed out last night on THE LAST HOUR (MSNBC),  "For clarification, Secretary Bessent himself is not a farmer.  What he actually means is he collects rent on farm land that he owns in North Dakota. "
 

According to The New York Times, Bessent — a former hedge fund manager whose net worth is estimated to top $500 million — owns as much as $25 million worth of corn and soybean farmland in North Dakota that he rents out to farmers, netting him more than $1 million a year.

Sen. Andy Kim (D-NJ) wrote, “Bessent is hoping Americans don’t know he’s worth over $500M. He doesn’t know the first thing about the pain farmers are feeling from this administration’s reckless actions.” 


As the Chump created shutdown continues, Chump is not even in the US.  Kind of like Republicans in the House of Representatives have had a two months break thanks to Speaker of the Closet Mike Johnson.  No, Chump's overseas.  THE NEW YORK TIMES notes:

  • Japan visit: President Trump met Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi of Japan on Tuesday as part of his six-day trip to Asia. The visit was heavy on flattery, but the leaders signaled no breakthrough in ongoing trade negotiations. Trump was set to meet on Tuesday evening with business leaders from several top Japanese companies. Read more ›


  • He can't even get that right.  And long before Chump skipped over to Asia, people were calling for him to address the SNAP benefits.  Senator Alex Padilla's office issued this on October 23rd, for example:

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Senators Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff (both D-Calif.) joined Senators Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), and Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), as well as 41 other colleagues, in calling on the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to release the billions of dollars at its disposal to ensure Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits continue in November. The letter to USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins comes as the Trump Administration’s refusal to provide SNAP funding will force at least 25 states, including California, to delay essential food benefits at the start of next month.

    Approximately 40 million low-income Americans — including 5.5 million Californians — depend on SNAP benefits to help afford their groceries, which has only grown more important amid skyrocketing food prices under President Trump. In response to USDA’s withholding of SNAP funding, Governor Gavin Newsom announced yesterday that he will deploy the California National Guard to support food banks across the state, similar to the emergency role the Guard played to facilitate nutrition assistance during the COVID-19 pandemic. California will also fast-track over $80 million in state support to protect these vital benefits.

    “We were deeply disturbed to hear that the USDA has instructed states to stop processing SNAP benefits for November and were surprised by your recent comments that the program will ‘run out of money in two weeks,’” wrote the Senators. “In fact, the USDA has several tools available which would enable SNAP benefits to be paid through or close to the end of November.”

    “In the event that more resources are needed than what is available in contingency funding, the USDA should explore all legal means to augment funds to pay the full amount of SNAP benefits in November. Americans are already struggling with the rising cost of groceries, and they cannot afford a sudden lapse in grocery assistance,” continued the Senators. “We urge you to immediately communicate to states and committees of jurisdiction the USDA’s plans to disburse the contingency funding to state agencies and utilize all available legal authorities so that American families can get benefits without interruption. Democrats remain at the table and ready to negotiate reopening the government.”

    The Democratic Senators raised the alarm about USDA’s failure to use available funding to continue SNAP, urging USDA to comply with the law by using contingency funding available for SNAP. They also urged USDA to use its interchange authority under 7 U.S.C. 2257 that allows the agency to transfer funds from other USDA nutrition programs to SNAP, which they recently used to transfer funding to the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), to protect important benefits during the government shutdown.

    In addition to Padilla, Schiff, Booker, Klobuchar, and Luján, the letter was also signed by Senators Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.), Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-Del.), Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), Chris Coons (D-Del.), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.), Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.), Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), Tim Kaine (D-Va.), Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), Andy Kim (D-N.J.), Angus King (I-Maine), Edward Markey (D-Mass.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), Patty Murray (D-Wash.), Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.), Gary Peters (D-Mich.), Jack Reed (D-R.I.), Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.), Tina Smith (D-Minn.), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.), Mark Warner (D-Va.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Peter Welch (D-Vt.), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.).

    Earlier this year, Senator Padilla joined a spotlight forum titled “Hunger by Design ­— The GOP’s Assault on SNAP” to question witnesses and expose President Trump and Republicans’ cruel budget proposal that cut nearly $200 billion in SNAP benefits while giving tax cuts to billionaires. He also repeatedly slammed Republicans’ billionaire-first budget reconciliation bill that is gutting critical programs like SNAP and devastating families in California and across the country. In June, Padilla joined the entire Senate Democratic Caucus in calling on Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) to reverse course on Republicans’ plan to take health care and food assistance away from millions of Americans — including seniors, children, people with disabilities, and veterans — to pay for tax breaks for ultra-wealthy Americans.

    Full text of the letter is available here and below:

    Dear Secretary Rollins,

    The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is our nation’s largest food assistance program, serving 42 million people, including 16 million children, 8 million seniors, and 4 million people with disabilities. Any halt in SNAP funding will have devastating impacts for program beneficiaries, increasing food insecurity and undermining family budgets. Given the critical importance of SNAP benefits, the USDA must take all steps possible to ensure that families do not go hungry.

    We were deeply disturbed to hear that the USDA has instructed states to stop processing SNAP benefits for November and were surprised by your recent comments that the program will “run out of money in two weeks.” In fact, the USDA has several tools available which would enable SNAP benefits to be paid through or close to the end of November. First, the USDA must, at a minimum under the law, use the contingency funding that is available for SNAP, as noted by USDA officials. Second, the USDA has interchange authority under 7 U.S.C. 2257 that permits the transfer of funds from other USDA nutrition programs. In fact, this authority was recently used by the USDA when it transferred money from child nutrition programs to the WIC account to maintain WIC benefits during the shutdown. In the event that more resources are needed than what is available in contingency funding, the USDA should explore all legal means to augment funds to pay the full amount of SNAP benefits in November.

    Americans are already struggling with the rising cost of groceries, and they cannot afford a sudden lapse in grocery assistance. We urge you to immediately communicate to states and committees of jurisdiction the USDA’s plans to disburse the contingency funding to state agencies and utilize all available legal authorities so that American families can get benefits without interruption. Democrats remain at the table and ready to negotiate reopening the government.

    Sincerely,

    ###


    Chump doesn't know how to inspire and he doesn't know how to lead.  He only knows how to inflict pain and destroy.   Hugh Cameron (NEWSWEEK) reports:


    Labor market weakness, inflation and growing debt challenges are taking their toll on consumers’ financial health and pushing them to seek legal advice at near-historic rates, according to a new report from legal service provider LegalShield.

    The report says that bankruptcy inquiries surged 17 percent in the third quarter of the year, continuing an upward trend that began in late 2021. This helped to push the Consumer Stress Legal Index up 4.4 percent between June and September, capping off seven consecutive months of increases and reaching its highest level since March 2020.
    To compile its figures, LegalShield tracks roughly 150,000 monthly calls to lawyers, with levels of demand for various legal services used to create its index of consumer stress.

    “We’re seeing families hit crisis mode heading into the holidays—especially around unsecured debt and rising housing costs,” LegalShield’s senior vice president of consumer analytics Matt Layton told Newsweek.

    Why It Matters
    Despite robust gross domestic product growth in the second quarter and early signs of an especially impressive corporate earnings season, there are concerns that the majority of Americans are missing out on the benefits of any economic expansion that may be occurring. Surveys charting consumer confidence continue to register declines, revealing widespread pessimism among households about their financial outlook and the economy as a whole.



    New topic.  Someone's concerned I won't be believed.  He e-mailed the public account to note Robert Alexander's report for NEWSWEEK:

    A federal court in Chicago has ordered sweeping new limits on U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations in the Midwest, ruling that agents repeatedly violated federal law and a binding consent decree by arresting people without warrants.

    The decision issued October 7 by U.S. District Judge Jeffrey I. Cummings extends court oversight of the agency until February 2, 2026, and warns that officers who disregard the order could face contempt or criminal referral.
    [. . .]
    The ruling marks a rare judicial rebuke of federal immigration enforcement, signaling that ICE agents themselves can be held legally accountable for overstepping constitutional limits. By extending a consent decree and imposing new oversight measures, Cummings effectively transformed what had been an internal policy dispute into a test of whether federal courts can police the enforcers of immigration law.

    The decision reinforces due process protections for immigrants and citizens alike, curbing warrantless arrests and asserting that even federal agents must answer to the same legal standards they are sworn to uphold.


    I wasn't aware of the article.  But we'd made the same conclusion here weeks ago.  Because it's the law.  And they can lie all they want -- the administration -- but it is the law.  Thank you to the e-mailer who hoped that would help others grasp what was going on (it may help some) and was also afraid that a deluge of e-mail attacks might make me shift my opinion.  On the latter, I don't.  If I'm right, I'm right.  The SOFA is a good example, Thanksgiving 2008, I poured over it (it was released late that day) and provided an analysis of it.  I stuck by it.  Many said I had it wrong and that there could be no other SOFA.  Of course there could be -- and of course the administration tried to do one, the only thing that stopped a new SOFA was Nouri al-Maliki was demanding more US troops on the ground than Barack Obama was willing to guarantee.  Had other given or had both to a number in the middle, there would have been another SOFA.  And, yes, we covered the hearings when the US government, in 2012, attempted to renegotiate the SOFA.  People would e-mail -- including bloggers and others -- we'll leave it at others -- telling me I was wrong.  I wasn't.  They never understood what the SOFA was.  It was to keep US troops on the ground.  It replaced the UN mandate.  That was a yearly agreement.  Each year, Nouri had to lie to the Iraqi people and circumvent the Parliament in order to renew it.  He was taking a lot of heat.  So the SOFA replaced that and it was four years (not one year) so that he wouldn't be under pressure every year.

    But again, thank you for caring.  That was sweet of you.

    ICE is out of control.  Rachel Maddow addressed this last night on MS NOW (soon to be, trying to get used to it).

     




    A federal agent blatantly violated a court order against using excessive force against journalists and protesters last Thursday by pointing a gun in a veteran’s face, saying “Bang, bang” and “You’re dead, liberal.”

    The Chicago Headline Club, a nonprofit representing journalists in the Chicago area, filed a complaint in federal court after the incident, which took place in the city’s Little Village neighborhood. Local residents had gathered to observe and protest a large presence of federal agents in the area, and Border Patrol chief Gregory Bovino did not respond well or care to take the earlier court order into consideration.

    According to the complaint, combat veteran Chris Gentry was “lawfully standing on the side of the road voicing his opposition as agents were driving by in their vehicles.” That’s when an agent pointed a gun at him and threatened to kill him.

    That was just one of many shocking incidents that day. Bovino also allegedly threw a tear gas canister into a crowd of protesters, who, according to the complaint, were not violent or committing any crimes. Some of the protesters attempted to talk to Bovino and other federal agents there and were rebuffed. Bovino and his colleagues instead shoved several people and threw more tear gas canisters at them, according to the complaint.


    They are out of control.  There is no oversight.  They break the law regularly and are not disciplined in any manner.  They're thugs.  I had one whine to me in an e-mail over the weekend.  He wrote that he thought I cared.  I'd warned what was going to happen to the agents -- they'll take their own lives in a few year or they'll self medicate with drugs or they'll do intensive therapy to process what they've done to other human beings.

    I do care.  But I've told you not to touch the stove.  I'm not your parent.  But I've told you.  I can't monitor you every moment of the day.  You're grown up, I warned you, now I'm done.  

    You know what you're doing is wrong or you and the other ICE agents wouldn't e-mail this site.  You know it's wrong.  The smart thing to do would be to quit.  The right thing to do would be to become a whistleblower and go to Congress to let them know what's actually going on.  But not everyone has that kind of bravery.  So you should just quit.  Stop breaking the law and stop harming human beings.

    But I've said that over and over.  

    And at this point, ICE has earned its bad image and you need to decide for yourself what you're going to do about it. 


    Federal agents carrying out President Trump’s crackdown on illegal immigration have repeatedly clashed with protesters and bystanders across the Chicago area in recent weeks. Sometimes, the agents have used tear gas, drawing criticism and bringing new attention to the chemical irritant that has been used by American law enforcement officers for decades.

    Generally, police officials say tear gas can help bring unruly crowds under control without hand-to-hand violence between officers and demonstrators, and with a lower risk of serious injury. But the chemicals can also have serious health effects, and police agencies have often been accused of using tear gas without justification or without giving sufficient warnings.


    Think about that.  Now think about this,   Luke Reevey (INDEPENDENT) reports:


    Chaos erupted in a Chicago neighbourhood after ICE agents fired tear gas on a residential street during an immigration raid, moments before the start of a children’s Halloween parade.

    Footage shows residents in Old Irving Park confronting federal agents who had several suspects pinned to the ground on Saturday (October 25), as tear gas enveloped the area.


     


    Wally's "THIS JUST IN! MAYBE SOME DAY PULTE WILL LEARN TO WIPE HIMSELF!" went up and the following sites updated: