So let's shorthand Scott Shane's article that hits the New York Times today but has been addressed at length on various Pacifica Radio programs since February (Shane gets in the required plug for his own paper in today's article). The article's entitled "National Archives Pact Let C.I.A. Withdraw Public Documents" and it addresses a secret pact made betweenthe CIA and the National Archives to take documents that the public has long had access to and secretly refuse to allow the public access. The agreement made between Michael J. Kurtz and the CIA (which of course remains an organization in the article as opposed to a name) was similar to the one Kurtz also made with the Air Force (in 2002). Those requesting the documents would not be given them nor would they be told that the access was prevented by an agreement with the CIA because (like the paper's own attitude), Kurtz agreed to keep them out of it. The news comes to light when John W. Carlin is replaced as the head of the archives by Allen Weinstein. Carlin claims he knew nothing of the plan. (Krutz reportedly informed Carlin of the agreement made with the CIA.)
Note that Martha recommends Christopher Lee's "Archives Pledges to End Secret Agreements" (Washington Post) on the same subject. Lee's article also states (though Martha feels states it more firmly) that the program began in 1999 but the agreement was not made until 2001.
Robin notes this section from Shane's article:
Mr. Weinstein said he would not permit such agreements in the future. If the withdrawal of previously declassified documents becomes necessary, he said, it will be conducted "with transparency," including disclosure of the number of documents removed.
Asked about Mr. Weinstein's statement, Paul Gimigliano, a C.I.A. spokesman, said, "Working very closely over the years with the National Archives, C.I.A.'s goal has been to ensure the greatest possible public access to material that has been properly declassified."
Robin wonders why the official statement by the CIA "end of story's it" as opposed to noting other known instances where the CIA says one thing but reality is another? The Times never takes a hard line with the CIA. With the FBI, sure, but not the CIA. There's never been a public statement by the CIA that the paper's not been willing to spin and look the other.
Though there's an effort to make the connection between the CIA's actions and the Air Force's, there's no need for the article to offer any tie to anything that hasn't already made. For instance, in today's paper, Julia Preston offers "Citing Security, C.I.A. Seeks Suit's Dismissal" which details a lawsuit over (apparently) health access. Apparently because the CIA is screaming national security in a case that a woman has brought against the CIA who employed her husband. (We'll assume that much can be taken as a "known" since the lawsuit has continued.) Her husband had a New York Stock Exchange license and " was in the securities business" when he was recruited to work for the CIA undercover. The woman's lawyer is prevented from speaking to her over a non-secure phone, is not allowed to travel to the foreign country she is currently in "because he would break the rules by bringing classified information back into the United States" and her lawyer, Mark S. Zaid, asserts "that the C.I.A. was blocking him from having a legal conversation with the woman." Both stories would benefit from the Times providing perspective both upon the CIA and upon how "national security" claims are used and misused. But that's a road the paper prefers not to travel down. They've always been fine with minimizing with regards to that agency. (Running with spin and not reporting on official reports predates Gary Webb though that may be the example that comes to many minds.) Stories never advance on this topic in the paper of record, they just dwindle and fade from memory.
[If the Gary Webb story is new to you, click here for one article by Parry and click here for Parry discussing the Webb story with Amy Goodman on Democracy Now! In addition, check out Parry's book Lost History.]
Mia notes Norman Solomon's latest, "Why Won't Moveon.org Oppose the Bombing of Iran?" (CounterPunch):
MoveOn.org sent out an email with the subject line "Don't Nuke Iran" to three million people on April 12. "There is one place where all of us can agree: Americans don't support a pre-emptive nuclear attack on Iran, and Congress must act to prevent the president from launching one before it's too late," the message said. And: "Please take a moment to add your name to our petition to stop a nuclear attack on Iran."
The petition's two sentences only convey opposition to a "nuclear" attack on Iran: "Congress and President Bush must rule out attacking Iran with nuclear weapons. Even the threat of a nuclear attack eliminates some of the best options we have for diplomacy, and the consequences could be catastrophic."
In MoveOn's mass email letter, the only reference to a non-nuclear attack on Iran came in a solitary sentence without any followup: "Even a conventional attack would likely be a disaster."
"Likely" be a disaster? Is there any U.S. military attack on Iran that plausibly would not be a disaster?
There's no way around the conclusion that the signers of the letter ("Eli, Joan, Nita, Marika and the MoveOn.org Political Action Team") chose to avoid committing themselves -- and avoid devoting MoveOn resources -- to categorical opposition to bombing Iran.
And Keesha notes this from PEN (People's Email Network):
ONLY OUR VOICES CAN STOP AN EVEN BIGGER DISASTER THAN IRAQ IN IRAN
The good news is that some key members of Congress are now speaking out for talks and diplomacy, instead of war as a first resort. So your personal messages are having an impact. Even Tony Blair has declared that Great Britain will NOT participate in an attack on Iran. The bad news is that credible voices are reporting that the Bush administration has ALREADY decided to do just that. Well, maybe they'll just have to UN-decide.
It is time for Congress to reassert their authority under the Constitution as the controlling voice on the declaration of war, and tell this administration that an attack on Iran is NOT on the table, and especially not a nuclear one. We cannot stand idly by while the Bush administration plunges us deeper into a quagmire we never should have entered in the first place.
ACTION PAGE: http://www.clearwaterforcongress.com/petitions/pnum248.php
[. . .]
If you would like to get alerts like these, you can do so at http://www.usalone.com/in.htm
Rod passes on today's scheduled topic for Democracy Now!:
* The case of Frank Jude: We go to Milwaukee where an all-white jury has acquitted three white police officers charged with brutally beating an African-American man.
The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.
the new york times
scott shane
julia preston
the washington post
christopher lee
robert parry
amy goodman
democracy now
frank jude
norman solomon
pen
peoples email network
Tuesday, April 18, 2006
Monday, April 17, 2006
Jane Fonda on Cover to Cover with Denny Smithson (KPFA, KPFB, KFCF)

Jess here, Jane Fonda there (to the left or above depending upon browser) and Jane Fonda on air. Drawing by Isaiah. I'm giving a heads up. KPFA today. 6:00 pm Eastern, 5:00 pm Central, 4:00 pm Mountain and 3:00 Pacific:
Cover to Cover with Denny Smithson
One of the most recognizable women of our time, America knows Jane Fonda as actress, activist, feminist, wife, and workout guru. In her extraordinary memoir, Fonda divides her life into three acts: her childhood, early films, and first marriage make up act one; her growing career in film, marriage to Ted Turner, and involvement in the Vietnam War belong to act two; and the third act belongs to the future, in which she hopes to "begin living consciously," and inspire others who can learn from her experiences. Fonda reveals intimate details and universal truths that she hopes "can provide a lens through which others can see their lives and how they can live them a little differently."
That's KPFA and you can listen online, for free, or you can listen over the airwaves in the Berkeley area on KPFA (94.1 FM) and probably on KPFB (89.3 FM) in Berkeley as well as
KFCF (88.1 FM) in Fresno.
****UPDATE by C.I. (Replacing Jess' update). There was a mistake with where Jess got his informantion. Jane Fonda will be on next Monday. Apparently the announcement was up on the main website and if you click here for the archived broadcast, you'll see Fonda listed as a today's guest (a mix up, it happens and it's not the end of the world). She's a guest next Monday. I didn't catch the show so I don't know who the guest was today but it wasn't Fonda..
Cover to Cover is a half hour broadcast that covers book. So you should check it out and if you did and didn't hear Fonda (six e-mails on that as I write), she's the guest next Monday. (We'll do a reminder then.)
The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.
kpfa
jane fonda
cover to cover with denny smithson
kpfb
kfcf
Democracy Now: Sam gardiner on Iran, Lilli Gruber on Berlusconi; NYT . . .
L.A. Protesters Commemorate Death of Teen Protester
In Los Angeles, 5,000 people marched on Saturday to call for immigrant rights and to mark the death of Anthony Soltero. Soltero was the 14-year-old middle school student who shot and killed himself two weeks ago shortly after taking part in a school walk out to protest proposed anti-immigration legislation. According to his family, the school's vice principal threatened Soltero that he could be sent to jail for three years for missing class because of the immigration protest. The school has disputed the family's claims. Anthony Soltero's mother spoke on Saturday. Meanwhile the New York Times reports hundreds of immigrants who have taken part in recent protests have been fired from their jobs.
HRW: Special Prosecutor Needed to Investigate Rumsfeld
Human Rights Watch is calling for a special prosecutor to be appointed to investigate whether Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is criminally liable for the torture of a detainee at Guantanamo Bay. According to an Army Inspector Generals report obtained by the online magazine Salon.com, Rumsfeld was personally involved in the abusive interrogation of a Saudi man named Mohammad al-Qahtani. The report reveals Rumsfeld communicated weekly about the interrogation of Kahtani with Maj. Gen. Geoffrey Miller at Guantanamo. Joanne Mariner of Human Rights Watch said, "The question at this point is not whether Secretary Rumsfeld should resign, it's whether he should be indicted." Human Rights Watch maintains Rumsfeld could be liable under the legal principle that holds a superior responsible for crimes committed by his subordinates when he knew or should have known that crimes were being committed, but fails to stop them.
U.S. Broke Human Rights Law By Arming Iraqi Militias
In news on Iraq, an internal State Department review has determined U.S. officials are doling out millions of dollars of arms and ammunition to Iraqi police units without ensuring the units are complying with U.S. laws that ban taxpayer-financed assistance for foreign security forces engaged in human-rights violations. The Chicago Tribune reports officials failed to take steps to comply with the laws over the past two years, amid mounting reports of torture and murder by Shiite-dominated Iraqi security forces. Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy crafted the law in the early 1990s after disclosures of widespread abuse by U.S.-supported forces in Latin America.
Pro-Democracy Protests Expand in Nepal
In Nepal, pro-democracy protests and strikes have entered their 12th day. On Sunday over 30,000 people defied a government ban on public gatherings and demonstrated in the capital of Katmandu in some of the largest protests to date. Meanwhile the general strike is being felt throughout the country. Widespread fuel and food shortages have been reported. And the nation's banks have closed in support of the general strike. On Saturday police beat and detained a number of journalists protesting curbs on press freedom.
Neo-Naxi Supremacist Convicted In WMD Case
In Tennessee, a white supremacist with Neo-Nazi ties has been convicted of attempting to acquire Sarin nerve and C-4 explosives in order to blow up government buildings. The man, Demetrius Van Crocker, once told an FBI informant that he dreamed of riding a motorcycle to Washington D.C. and setting off a dirty nuclear bomb while the House and Senate were in session. Crocker also said he wanted to get a helicopter license so he could bomb or spray poison gas on the African-American neighborhoods in Jackson Tennessee. Crocker was arrested after he bought nerve gas from an undercover agent. His attorney argued Crocker was prone to exaggeration and was a victim of entrapment. Despite the serious charges, the national press has ignored the story. The New York Times, Washington Post or Los Angeles Times have yet to report on Crocker's arrest or conviction. A recent report by the Southern Poverty Law Center found that the radical right has attempted to carry out at least 60 terrorist plots since the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing that killed 168 people.
The above five items are from today's Democracy Now! Headlines and were selected by Mavis, Brandon, Wil, Tori and Susan. Democracy Now! ("always informing you," as Marcia says):
Headlines for April 17, 2006
- HRW: Special Prosecutor Needed to Investigate Rumsfeld
- Gen. Richard Myers: It is "Wrong" to Criticize Rumsfeld
- Sen. Lugar Calls for Direct Negotiations with Iran
- Six Die in Tel Aviv Suicide Bombing
- U.S. Broke Human Rights Law By Arming Iraqi Militias
- Report: U.S. Military is Planning a "Second Liberation of Baghdad"
- U.S. Investigating Civilian Casualties in Afghanistan
- California Teacher Board Divests From Firms Tied to Sudan
- Ex-ExxonMobil CEO Earned $150,000 Per Day
- All-White Jury Acquits Officers in Vicious Beating
- Police Arrest 17 at University of Virginia Sit-In
Retired Colonel Sam Gardiner on Iran War Plans: "The Issue is Not Whether the Military Option Would Be Used But Who Approved the Start of Operations Already"
Retired Air Force Colonel Sam Gardiner says a military operation has already begun inside Iran. Gardiner says, "It's a very serious question about the constitutional framework under which we are now conducting military operations in Iran." We also speak with Gardiner about what he calls the "unprecedented" revolt against Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld within the military.
Fmr. Top Italian News Anchor Lilli Gruber on the Italy Elections, Media Monopoly and Beating Berlusconi for a Seat in European Parliament
Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi continues to refuse to concede defeat in the country's general elections. We speak with Lilli Gruber, a former top TV news anchor in Italy who resigned from national broadcaster RAI, criticizing Berlusconi's media influence as an "unresolved conflict of interest." She ran against Berlusconi in 2004 for a seat in European Parliament and won.
Jailed Palestinian Professor Sami Al-Arian to Be Deported After Prosecutors Fail to Convict Him on a Single Charge
Federal authorities have decided to deport Palestinian activist and professor Sami Al-Arian after failing to convict him on charges he helped lead the Palestinian militant group Islamic Jihad. We speak with reporter John Sugg who has been tracking the case for over a decade.
Iraq? The Times of India reports that at least 31 Iraqis died on Sunday with an additional 32 wounded. In Baghdad today, Xinhua reports, the corpse of Taha al-Mutlak, brother of Salih al-Mutlak ("top Sunni policitian"), was found. Also in Baghdad, a gun battle between the Iraqi army and the resistance has resulted in seven civilians wounded and one killed according to the Associated Press.. Still in Baghdad, Reuters notes, a doctor was kidnapped. Still in Baghdad, back to Reuters, the corpses of 12 were found -- seven had bullet holes, three had signs indicating torture. The Associated Press is reporting a bomb exploded today in Ramadi "in front of a U.S. observation post." Deutsche Presse-Agentur reports that Jebail has seen the death of at least three Iraqis and the injury of 10 more. The three dead? Two children and a woman. The cause? "Pacification." They, and the ones wounded, according to "security force spokesman" Mustafa Karrim, were guilty of being in their homes.
And back to Reuters, back to Baghdad for "IRAQ: Baghdadis say curfew prevents access to medical care:"
Residents of the Iraqi capital are complaining that a recently-imposed government curfew, aimed at deterring ongoing violence, is hampering access to medical care.
"My son had stomach pains two days ago, but I couldn't take him to the hospital because we're prohibited from leaving our homes -- even for medical emergencies," said Baghdad resident and father of four Abu Muhammad, 47.
With a curfew imposed from 11pm until 6am, no resident is allowed to venture outside between these times, while security forces have the right to shoot violators on sight. Anyone requiring medical assistance, therefore, must wait overnight to seek help.
Highlights? (Commentary of sorts after highlights.) Lloyd asks if we can note the most recent broadcast of Progressive Radio Show. We can and will (Lloyd, remind me if we don't add that to the permalinks by this weekend that's been on the to-do list for too long).
Houzahn Mahmoud is interviewed by Matthew Rothschild:
An Iraqi feminist, Houzahn Mahmoud heads the British chapter of the Organization for Women's Freedom in iraq. She talks of the new Dark Age for Iraqi women and says neither the Islamists nor the Americans provide any hope.
Link takes you to an online version of the broadcast (in full, it's not abridged). In terms of broadcasting today, on a similar topic, remember what Cindy highlighted on KPFA today (time in Pacific):
1:00 pm
Women's Magazine
Women correspondents who covered the war in Iraq will join us by phone. May Ying Welch, freelancing with Al-Jezeera, Marie Colvin of the Sunday Times London, Hannah Allam with Knight Ridder and others will talk about the perspective that women bring to the coverage of the war. Marking the 57th anniversary of KPFA we host former programmers from KPFA Women's Department in the 1970's through the 1990's.
Staying on the same themes (women and peace), Julie notes "Four Nobel Prize Winners Honored With Global Women's Rights Awards" (Feminist Wire Daily):
At a star-studded ceremony at the Beverly Hills Hotel on Tuesday, the Feminist Majority Foundation honored four of the seven living women Nobel Peace Prize winners for their work for women's rights. "These are obviously extraordinary people. All the more so when you realize how hard it is to win a Nobel Prize... Of the 758 Nobel Prize winners, only 33 have been women, and only 12 have been awarded the Peace Prize," said host Salma Hayek in her opening address. Actor-director Hayek co-hosted the event with Mavis and Jay Leno.
The award, inspired by Eleanor Roosevelt's human rights and peace work, was presented to Nobel Prize Laureates Shirin Ebadi (2003) of Iran, Jody Williams (1997) of the United States, Betty Williams (1997) of Northern Ireland, and Rigoberta Menchu Tum (1992) of Guatemala. As the laureates took the stage, they were greeted with an overwhelming standing ovation.
Wait! We're still on peace (a topic that always needs attention). Lewis notes this from CODEPINK:
Stop Nuclear War With Iran! We weren't able to stop the last war, but we must stop the next one
NOW! The United Nations, which is the mandated to uphold international law, must speak out against the Bush Administration's plans. Let's send a collective letter to Secretary General Kofi Annan imploring him to denounce this threat and call for a diplomatic solution. Click here to sign on and/or send your own, and pass it to friends and family around the world. Let's let the Bush administration and Kofi Annan know that the world is demanding an end to this madness!
We noted an event on May 1st last week. We can note it again (true of any event). So we're highlighting it now and if you'd like it noted more, e-mail. Francisco notes Selene Rivera's "Group Calls for 'A Day Without an Immigrant'" (Pacific News Service):
Activists with the March 25th Coalition, organizers of the massive immigration rights protest which took place in Los Angeles two weeks ago, are now calling for an economic boycott to take place next month.
Organizers are asking the public to stay home from work, keep their kids out of school and to refrain from shopping or purchasing anything on May 1st -- International Workers' Day.
"It will be a day without immigrants," said Javier Rodriguez, one of the main organizers of both the protest rally and the proposed boycott.
"The arguments against [the immigrant community] claim we abuse the economy of this country... And if this is in fact the case, then that day we will see a resurgence of the economy," said Rodriguez.
Brenda wonders why I was so shocked that the New York Times (reporting section) is promoting a war on Iran? I just was. Rebecca has said repeatedly that each morning, I wake up with hope for the paper. I usually dismiss that; however, today I was very excited to grab the paper . . . and then I read it.
Mid-day Saturday, I'd spoken with a friend who was very upset about the potential war on Iran. What the administration does (how low they'll go) doesn't surprise me. But the paper?
After their shameful "reporting" in the lead up to the (illegal) war on Iraq, after the mea culpa, I guess I honestly expected that somehow it would change. That was a dumb thought on my part. War pornographer Michael Gordon and William J. Broad were writing partners with Judith Miller. No, most people don't know their names. No, few besides Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzalez would ever call any of them on their reporting.
Staying on that for a minute. Judith Miller wasn't the problem. She was part of the problem. But there's been no change at all in the way the Times will maket/sell this impending war.
So this morning, I was going through the e-mails and the paper, turning to stories members were e-mailing about, and it was just the worst edition. I hadn't intended to comment on the Iran reporting or even read it. But there are so many problems with every story that ran this morning. From Sengupta wondering/fretting over the state of the monarchy and whether or not politicians will able to curb the spirit of democracy to every other article that members highlighted. (After those entries, I was done with the paper.)
The word, conveyed on the phone, is that the reporters think they are being "realistic." (Not Sengupta, I'm referring to Iran coverage.) "Realistic." Hmm.
Instead of thinking what might happen or what could happen, why not fix the bad reporting? 'We weren't appropriately skeptical' or whatever the mea culpa said -- well how has that changed? Not one damn bit.
This goes beyond a fact check but to contextual critiques of how they are selling the war -- and they are, again, selling it. They can kid themselves that they're being "realistic." They aren't. "Realistic" has nothing to do with their approach which takes official claims and assertions (usually whispered) and throws them on the front page as fact.
Look at the anonymice. Take just the "European diplomat." How does that help the understanding of the story? It doesn't. It's not about the story. The only detail the anonymice provide is FEAR. It's scare time and Broad's ready to scare up another war. Here's a proposal for the Times: When the administration wants a war, you only give anonymity to those who aren't lusting for the war also. It's so self-serving and a reporter with half a brain would grasp that.
That hawks thrive in the reporting circles at the paper is not a surprise. That having seen Miller burned for this behavior, they don't even try to cover their rears . . . But why should they? The country knows one name and one name only: "JUDITH MILLER."
William J. Broad? Michael Gordon? Co-writers of controversial Miller stories with claims that never bore out. Let's remember, the faulty story about trailers found in Iraq that BullyBoy would claim (falsely) as WMD? That article was written by Judith Miller AND William J. Broad.
But it was Miller Time and everyone else got to slink off. (The way Dexy Filkins thinks he'll be able to but I'm told that's not quite the way it will play out.)
So learn from the coverage that prompted the mea culpa? Why should they? Why should Gordon or Broad care or worry? They got a pass. Miller's gone and we're all supposed to believe that she was the problem.
So, point, this morning, a number of members (over ten, less than twenty) wrote in about that article. And I just couldn't believe it once I'd read it. I haven't read this morning's entries but I did ask the friend I'm dictating this too about them because I was afraid I'd broken the work-safe policy with my own words. (I was furious this morning.) Apparently, I didn't.
But the Times (reporting section) wants to sell this war. It was a shock. It's not now. I was wrong to think they'd actually learned something from a shameful episode that's not all that long ago. But why should they when the uninformed went after Miller and let her males co-writers off? Bash-the-bitch is always the popular game and a lot of men skate free as a result. The paper can't own its mistakes and neither can Gordon, so I was stupid to have been surprised this morning. (But I honestly was -- surprised and stupid.)
The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.
democracy now
amy goodman
juan gonzalez
codepink
matthew rothschild
feminist wire
kpfa
womens magazine
iraq
the new york times
william j. broad
michael gordon
sex and politics and screeds and attitude
the third estate sunday review
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.
In Los Angeles, 5,000 people marched on Saturday to call for immigrant rights and to mark the death of Anthony Soltero. Soltero was the 14-year-old middle school student who shot and killed himself two weeks ago shortly after taking part in a school walk out to protest proposed anti-immigration legislation. According to his family, the school's vice principal threatened Soltero that he could be sent to jail for three years for missing class because of the immigration protest. The school has disputed the family's claims. Anthony Soltero's mother spoke on Saturday. Meanwhile the New York Times reports hundreds of immigrants who have taken part in recent protests have been fired from their jobs.
HRW: Special Prosecutor Needed to Investigate Rumsfeld
Human Rights Watch is calling for a special prosecutor to be appointed to investigate whether Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is criminally liable for the torture of a detainee at Guantanamo Bay. According to an Army Inspector Generals report obtained by the online magazine Salon.com, Rumsfeld was personally involved in the abusive interrogation of a Saudi man named Mohammad al-Qahtani. The report reveals Rumsfeld communicated weekly about the interrogation of Kahtani with Maj. Gen. Geoffrey Miller at Guantanamo. Joanne Mariner of Human Rights Watch said, "The question at this point is not whether Secretary Rumsfeld should resign, it's whether he should be indicted." Human Rights Watch maintains Rumsfeld could be liable under the legal principle that holds a superior responsible for crimes committed by his subordinates when he knew or should have known that crimes were being committed, but fails to stop them.
U.S. Broke Human Rights Law By Arming Iraqi Militias
In news on Iraq, an internal State Department review has determined U.S. officials are doling out millions of dollars of arms and ammunition to Iraqi police units without ensuring the units are complying with U.S. laws that ban taxpayer-financed assistance for foreign security forces engaged in human-rights violations. The Chicago Tribune reports officials failed to take steps to comply with the laws over the past two years, amid mounting reports of torture and murder by Shiite-dominated Iraqi security forces. Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy crafted the law in the early 1990s after disclosures of widespread abuse by U.S.-supported forces in Latin America.
Pro-Democracy Protests Expand in Nepal
In Nepal, pro-democracy protests and strikes have entered their 12th day. On Sunday over 30,000 people defied a government ban on public gatherings and demonstrated in the capital of Katmandu in some of the largest protests to date. Meanwhile the general strike is being felt throughout the country. Widespread fuel and food shortages have been reported. And the nation's banks have closed in support of the general strike. On Saturday police beat and detained a number of journalists protesting curbs on press freedom.
Neo-Naxi Supremacist Convicted In WMD Case
In Tennessee, a white supremacist with Neo-Nazi ties has been convicted of attempting to acquire Sarin nerve and C-4 explosives in order to blow up government buildings. The man, Demetrius Van Crocker, once told an FBI informant that he dreamed of riding a motorcycle to Washington D.C. and setting off a dirty nuclear bomb while the House and Senate were in session. Crocker also said he wanted to get a helicopter license so he could bomb or spray poison gas on the African-American neighborhoods in Jackson Tennessee. Crocker was arrested after he bought nerve gas from an undercover agent. His attorney argued Crocker was prone to exaggeration and was a victim of entrapment. Despite the serious charges, the national press has ignored the story. The New York Times, Washington Post or Los Angeles Times have yet to report on Crocker's arrest or conviction. A recent report by the Southern Poverty Law Center found that the radical right has attempted to carry out at least 60 terrorist plots since the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing that killed 168 people.
The above five items are from today's Democracy Now! Headlines and were selected by Mavis, Brandon, Wil, Tori and Susan. Democracy Now! ("always informing you," as Marcia says):
Headlines for April 17, 2006
- HRW: Special Prosecutor Needed to Investigate Rumsfeld
- Gen. Richard Myers: It is "Wrong" to Criticize Rumsfeld
- Sen. Lugar Calls for Direct Negotiations with Iran
- Six Die in Tel Aviv Suicide Bombing
- U.S. Broke Human Rights Law By Arming Iraqi Militias
- Report: U.S. Military is Planning a "Second Liberation of Baghdad"
- U.S. Investigating Civilian Casualties in Afghanistan
- California Teacher Board Divests From Firms Tied to Sudan
- Ex-ExxonMobil CEO Earned $150,000 Per Day
- All-White Jury Acquits Officers in Vicious Beating
- Police Arrest 17 at University of Virginia Sit-In
Retired Colonel Sam Gardiner on Iran War Plans: "The Issue is Not Whether the Military Option Would Be Used But Who Approved the Start of Operations Already"
Retired Air Force Colonel Sam Gardiner says a military operation has already begun inside Iran. Gardiner says, "It's a very serious question about the constitutional framework under which we are now conducting military operations in Iran." We also speak with Gardiner about what he calls the "unprecedented" revolt against Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld within the military.
Fmr. Top Italian News Anchor Lilli Gruber on the Italy Elections, Media Monopoly and Beating Berlusconi for a Seat in European Parliament
Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi continues to refuse to concede defeat in the country's general elections. We speak with Lilli Gruber, a former top TV news anchor in Italy who resigned from national broadcaster RAI, criticizing Berlusconi's media influence as an "unresolved conflict of interest." She ran against Berlusconi in 2004 for a seat in European Parliament and won.
Jailed Palestinian Professor Sami Al-Arian to Be Deported After Prosecutors Fail to Convict Him on a Single Charge
Federal authorities have decided to deport Palestinian activist and professor Sami Al-Arian after failing to convict him on charges he helped lead the Palestinian militant group Islamic Jihad. We speak with reporter John Sugg who has been tracking the case for over a decade.
Iraq? The Times of India reports that at least 31 Iraqis died on Sunday with an additional 32 wounded. In Baghdad today, Xinhua reports, the corpse of Taha al-Mutlak, brother of Salih al-Mutlak ("top Sunni policitian"), was found. Also in Baghdad, a gun battle between the Iraqi army and the resistance has resulted in seven civilians wounded and one killed according to the Associated Press.. Still in Baghdad, Reuters notes, a doctor was kidnapped. Still in Baghdad, back to Reuters, the corpses of 12 were found -- seven had bullet holes, three had signs indicating torture. The Associated Press is reporting a bomb exploded today in Ramadi "in front of a U.S. observation post." Deutsche Presse-Agentur reports that Jebail has seen the death of at least three Iraqis and the injury of 10 more. The three dead? Two children and a woman. The cause? "Pacification." They, and the ones wounded, according to "security force spokesman" Mustafa Karrim, were guilty of being in their homes.
And back to Reuters, back to Baghdad for "IRAQ: Baghdadis say curfew prevents access to medical care:"
Residents of the Iraqi capital are complaining that a recently-imposed government curfew, aimed at deterring ongoing violence, is hampering access to medical care.
"My son had stomach pains two days ago, but I couldn't take him to the hospital because we're prohibited from leaving our homes -- even for medical emergencies," said Baghdad resident and father of four Abu Muhammad, 47.
With a curfew imposed from 11pm until 6am, no resident is allowed to venture outside between these times, while security forces have the right to shoot violators on sight. Anyone requiring medical assistance, therefore, must wait overnight to seek help.
Highlights? (Commentary of sorts after highlights.) Lloyd asks if we can note the most recent broadcast of Progressive Radio Show. We can and will (Lloyd, remind me if we don't add that to the permalinks by this weekend that's been on the to-do list for too long).
Houzahn Mahmoud is interviewed by Matthew Rothschild:
An Iraqi feminist, Houzahn Mahmoud heads the British chapter of the Organization for Women's Freedom in iraq. She talks of the new Dark Age for Iraqi women and says neither the Islamists nor the Americans provide any hope.
Link takes you to an online version of the broadcast (in full, it's not abridged). In terms of broadcasting today, on a similar topic, remember what Cindy highlighted on KPFA today (time in Pacific):
1:00 pm
Women's Magazine
Women correspondents who covered the war in Iraq will join us by phone. May Ying Welch, freelancing with Al-Jezeera, Marie Colvin of the Sunday Times London, Hannah Allam with Knight Ridder and others will talk about the perspective that women bring to the coverage of the war. Marking the 57th anniversary of KPFA we host former programmers from KPFA Women's Department in the 1970's through the 1990's.
Staying on the same themes (women and peace), Julie notes "Four Nobel Prize Winners Honored With Global Women's Rights Awards" (Feminist Wire Daily):
At a star-studded ceremony at the Beverly Hills Hotel on Tuesday, the Feminist Majority Foundation honored four of the seven living women Nobel Peace Prize winners for their work for women's rights. "These are obviously extraordinary people. All the more so when you realize how hard it is to win a Nobel Prize... Of the 758 Nobel Prize winners, only 33 have been women, and only 12 have been awarded the Peace Prize," said host Salma Hayek in her opening address. Actor-director Hayek co-hosted the event with Mavis and Jay Leno.
The award, inspired by Eleanor Roosevelt's human rights and peace work, was presented to Nobel Prize Laureates Shirin Ebadi (2003) of Iran, Jody Williams (1997) of the United States, Betty Williams (1997) of Northern Ireland, and Rigoberta Menchu Tum (1992) of Guatemala. As the laureates took the stage, they were greeted with an overwhelming standing ovation.
Wait! We're still on peace (a topic that always needs attention). Lewis notes this from CODEPINK:
We noted an event on May 1st last week. We can note it again (true of any event). So we're highlighting it now and if you'd like it noted more, e-mail. Francisco notes Selene Rivera's "Group Calls for 'A Day Without an Immigrant'" (Pacific News Service):
Activists with the March 25th Coalition, organizers of the massive immigration rights protest which took place in Los Angeles two weeks ago, are now calling for an economic boycott to take place next month.
Organizers are asking the public to stay home from work, keep their kids out of school and to refrain from shopping or purchasing anything on May 1st -- International Workers' Day.
"It will be a day without immigrants," said Javier Rodriguez, one of the main organizers of both the protest rally and the proposed boycott.
"The arguments against [the immigrant community] claim we abuse the economy of this country... And if this is in fact the case, then that day we will see a resurgence of the economy," said Rodriguez.
Brenda wonders why I was so shocked that the New York Times (reporting section) is promoting a war on Iran? I just was. Rebecca has said repeatedly that each morning, I wake up with hope for the paper. I usually dismiss that; however, today I was very excited to grab the paper . . . and then I read it.
Mid-day Saturday, I'd spoken with a friend who was very upset about the potential war on Iran. What the administration does (how low they'll go) doesn't surprise me. But the paper?
After their shameful "reporting" in the lead up to the (illegal) war on Iraq, after the mea culpa, I guess I honestly expected that somehow it would change. That was a dumb thought on my part. War pornographer Michael Gordon and William J. Broad were writing partners with Judith Miller. No, most people don't know their names. No, few besides Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzalez would ever call any of them on their reporting.
Staying on that for a minute. Judith Miller wasn't the problem. She was part of the problem. But there's been no change at all in the way the Times will maket/sell this impending war.
So this morning, I was going through the e-mails and the paper, turning to stories members were e-mailing about, and it was just the worst edition. I hadn't intended to comment on the Iran reporting or even read it. But there are so many problems with every story that ran this morning. From Sengupta wondering/fretting over the state of the monarchy and whether or not politicians will able to curb the spirit of democracy to every other article that members highlighted. (After those entries, I was done with the paper.)
The word, conveyed on the phone, is that the reporters think they are being "realistic." (Not Sengupta, I'm referring to Iran coverage.) "Realistic." Hmm.
Instead of thinking what might happen or what could happen, why not fix the bad reporting? 'We weren't appropriately skeptical' or whatever the mea culpa said -- well how has that changed? Not one damn bit.
This goes beyond a fact check but to contextual critiques of how they are selling the war -- and they are, again, selling it. They can kid themselves that they're being "realistic." They aren't. "Realistic" has nothing to do with their approach which takes official claims and assertions (usually whispered) and throws them on the front page as fact.
Look at the anonymice. Take just the "European diplomat." How does that help the understanding of the story? It doesn't. It's not about the story. The only detail the anonymice provide is FEAR. It's scare time and Broad's ready to scare up another war. Here's a proposal for the Times: When the administration wants a war, you only give anonymity to those who aren't lusting for the war also. It's so self-serving and a reporter with half a brain would grasp that.
That hawks thrive in the reporting circles at the paper is not a surprise. That having seen Miller burned for this behavior, they don't even try to cover their rears . . . But why should they? The country knows one name and one name only: "JUDITH MILLER."
William J. Broad? Michael Gordon? Co-writers of controversial Miller stories with claims that never bore out. Let's remember, the faulty story about trailers found in Iraq that BullyBoy would claim (falsely) as WMD? That article was written by Judith Miller AND William J. Broad.
But it was Miller Time and everyone else got to slink off. (The way Dexy Filkins thinks he'll be able to but I'm told that's not quite the way it will play out.)
So learn from the coverage that prompted the mea culpa? Why should they? Why should Gordon or Broad care or worry? They got a pass. Miller's gone and we're all supposed to believe that she was the problem.
So, point, this morning, a number of members (over ten, less than twenty) wrote in about that article. And I just couldn't believe it once I'd read it. I haven't read this morning's entries but I did ask the friend I'm dictating this too about them because I was afraid I'd broken the work-safe policy with my own words. (I was furious this morning.) Apparently, I didn't.
But the Times (reporting section) wants to sell this war. It was a shock. It's not now. I was wrong to think they'd actually learned something from a shameful episode that's not all that long ago. But why should they when the uninformed went after Miller and let her males co-writers off? Bash-the-bitch is always the popular game and a lot of men skate free as a result. The paper can't own its mistakes and neither can Gordon, so I was stupid to have been surprised this morning. (But I honestly was -- surprised and stupid.)
The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.
democracy now
amy goodman
juan gonzalez
codepink
matthew rothschild
feminist wire
kpfa
womens magazine
iraq
the new york times
william j. broad
michael gordon
sex and politics and screeds and attitude
the third estate sunday review
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)