Monday, December 30, 2013

Nouri attacks Anbar

Al Mada reports 44 MPs with the Motahidon Alliance have submitted their resignations to Speaker of Parliament Osama al-Nujaifi because of today's attacks on the protesters in Anbar.  Deputy Prime Minister Saleh al-Mutlaq is stating all MPs from the Iraqiya bloc should resign right now to trigger an immediate election.

Saleh came into Parliament (and to his Deputy Prime Minister post) because Iraqiya won the 2010 elections.  He's now estranged from Iraqiya which will most likely not be a major grouping in the planned April 30, 2014 elections. (Barring a decision on the part of al-Nujaifi -- among others -- to run on the Iraqiya ticket, Iraqiya will not be a major entity in the elections.)   He is correct that resignations could trigger an immediate (say within 30 days) election per the Constitution but when in Nouri al-Maliki's two terms as prime minister has the government followed the Constitution?

al-Mutleq also reveals that the government has cut off all internet and telephone communication for and among Anbar residents.

All Iraq News notes the spokesperson for the Motahidon Alliance held a press conference and stated that the resignations are taking place and "that the war in Anbar is unconstitutional and violate all patriotic terms."

What's going on in Anbar?

Nouri's thugs are attacking the peaceful protest sites in Falluja and Ramadi.

Al Mada cites an Anabar police source explaining Nour had the army storm Falluja following tank shellings and mortars being shot at the protesters.  The source states an unknown number of people are wounded and dead.

If this surprises you then you're one of many the western media has failed as they have refused to report Nouri al-Maliki's threat made on television Friday that he would not allow the protesters to stage another Friday sit-in and that he would burn the tents in the squares down.

When Americans have their panties and boxers in a wad, they expect the whole damn world to care.

Let an Occupy site be closed down and it's the end of constitutional government in the United States.  Let a bunch of people go to a political convention (I'm talking in the '00s and not the 60s) with violent slogans and a skirmish ensue and, damn, they want the whole world to know.

But, funny, the left in America that I'm referring haven't said one damn word in defense of the Iraqi protesters.

The hideous Amy Goodman did a segment allegedly on Iraq on her Friday show.

It never mentioned the ongoing protests which have now passed the one year mark.

Her stupid AFP reporter (WG Dunlap) can't be bothered with even Tweeting on the protests and Raed Jarrar has not written a Tweet on Iraq since March.  He's Tweeted non-stop.  He just isn't interested in Iraq.

He's ignored the increase in violence and everything else.

But there he was on Friday, as Ava and I noted in "Media: The Collapse of Indymedia and its Queen," offering generic statements (that couldn't even name the prime minister), the sort a student who failed to do the assigned reading might offer, generalized and vague and never touching on a single even in Iraq that took place this year -- not a protest, not an attack, not provincial elections, nothing.  As we noted:

Jarrar left Iraq long ago physically and apparently mentally and emotionally.
For example, in December, Raed offered  22 Tweets and re-Tweets.  Exempting the ones promoting his appearance on Friday's Democracy Now!, how many Tweets or re-Tweets were about Iraq?
Only one.  And it was a re-Tweet.  Iraq's had a huge resurgence in violence in the last two years. December's already at least the second most violent month (based on deaths) of the year.  But Raed never took the time to write a 160 characters or less Tweet on that.
If you go through his Tweets from September through November, you'll find no Tweet or re-Tweet on Iraq.
In fact, you have to drop back to May 1st to find the term "Iraq" on Raed's Twitter feed.  That's when he reTweets about an attack on a US Iraq War veteran.
1145 people died from violence in Iraq in the month of July.  That is currently monthly total record (though December is not over yet).  Raed didn't Tweet about it.
In fact, you have to go back to March -- the 10th anniversary of the start of the illegal war -- to find Raed Tweeting about Iraq and then it's more about "pre-2003" than anything else.


It wasn't a discussion of Iraq at all.  It was just another marking time moment from Amy Goodman where she disinforms the country -- or the small number in the US that still follow her after she sold war on Libya and tried to sell war on Syria (read Ava and my piece if that's news to you).


And always Goody Whore begs for money.

Ava and I note her December 26th e-mail appeal as well as her begging every visitor to donate $10 bucks -- why doesn't she donate the over $100,000 a year she gets for serving on the 'board' of Democracy Now! -- please note, when you serve on a board, you get a payment of some form.  This payment is not for her on air duties. This over $100,000 a year (noted in Charles Davis' "The Exploited Laborers of the Liberal Media") is just for serving on the board.

How does she justify even a dime?

You do a segment supposedly on Iraq Friday.

All hell breaks loose on Monday at the protest sites.

Your viewers and listeners have no idea what's going on because despite the protests going on continuously since December 21, 2012, you and your guests failed to even raise the topic -- failed to raise it, let alone discuss it.

How does that level of 'journalism' deserve donations?

We'll go over the horrors in Anbar in the snapshot tonight.

For now, let's look at other violence in Iraq.


National Iraqi News Agency reports 2 Mosul bombing targeted MP Jassim Mohammed Hussein and left at least two of his bodyguards injured,  two children were kidnapped in Kirkuk, an armed attack in Balad left Lt Col Nouri al-Azzawi injured, a Qayyarah sticky bombing left army Colonel Raad Yassin Amash killed, 1 Baijia suicide  car bomber took his own life and that of 1 police officer and the police officer's son, a Mosul car bombing left 4 people dead and four people injured, a Kirkuk car bombing left six people injured, an armed clash in Falluja left 8 people dead and forty injured, Sheikh Qais al-Jubouri was shot dead in Muqdadiya, a Baquba bombing left two police members injured, an al-Hamdania attack left 1 Kurdish force and 1 woman dead, an attack on a Mosul federal police checkpoint left 1 police member dead, a Mosul garage bombing left three people injured, a Tikrit car bombing targeting the Vice Chair of Salahuddin Province  left four of his bodyguards injured , and a Tuz Khormato car bombing claimed the lives of 2 police members and left four more injured.  All Iraq News adds a Kirkuk motorcyle bombing left four children injured, 3 corpses of Iraqi soldiers were discovered dumped in the streets of Beiji, an armed attack in Shurqat left 5 Iraqi soldiers dead, and a mayor and 1 teacher walking in Mosul were shot dead,



Early Monday morning, we finally finished with The Third Estate Sunday Review and here's the new content:



  • Truest statement of the week
  • Truest statement of the week II
  • A note to our readers
  • 2013 Person of the Year
  • Media: The Collapse of Indymedia and its Queen
  • 2013 Outlet of the Year
  • 2013 Illegal Downloader of the Year
  • 2013 Ingrate of the year
  • 2013 Creep of the Year
  • 2013 Trend: Closeted, Butch, Black Lesbians
  • 2013's Dupe Of The Year
  • TV Program of 2013
  • Jim's World
  • Nelson Mandela's victory is sweeter when it's not ...
  • Mandela, sanitized (Mumia Abu-Jamal)



  • Highlights









  • The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.













    Sunday, December 29, 2013

    I Hate The War

    At Third, we're still working.

    We still don't have the editorial.

    We've got to go person of the year (already selected), creep of the year (ibid) and download of the year (ibid).  I'm being vague on the categories, FYI.

    But the point being, Jim's saying it will be two more hours so in this 15 minute break, I'm doing a very quick entry.

    First up, Iraq Body Count.

    Saturday 28 December: 25 killed

    Ramadi: 6 by gunfire.
    Mosul: 6 policemen in separate attacks, 1 professor by gunfire.
    Tikrit: 4 policemen by gunfire.
    Ramadi: 1 body.
    Falluja: 3 policemen by gunfire.
    Shirqat: 3 family members by gunfire.
    Sowaidan Balherquat: 1 policeman by gunfire.

    December casualties so far: 910 civilians killed.

     Over 9,400 killed this year.


    Sunday 29 December: 20 killed

    Baghdad: 7 by gunfire.
    Abu Ghraib: 4 Sahwa members by gunfire.
    Mosul: 3 by gunfire.
    Baquba: 1 by IED.
    Beiji: 1 policeman by gunfire.
    Muqdadiya: 2 by gunfire.
    Iskandariya: 1 by IED.
    Hajaj: 1 Sahwa member by suicide car bomber.

    December casualties so far: 930 civilians killed.

    Over 9,400 killed this year. 


    I have not read any Arabic press since this morning and don't want to.

    That's not complaining about the Arabic press.  It does a much better job covering Iraq than the English language press.

    But this goes to some complaints that have been coming in.

    They are valid complaints.

    A number of you are upset and/or bothered that you're not getting entries up by 9:00 or 10:00 am during the week.

    As one community member (rightly) wrote Thursday, "It's one thing when you're on a campus and talking about Syria but clearly you're not doing any speaking this week."

    That is correct.

    I was already tired of being online and I haven't hidden that.

    We will be moving to one entry a morning.

    And it will be in the morning.

    At some point, in January, I hope to go back to an early morning post.

    But last week?

    Like today, I don't want to read about Iraq.

    I spend more time thinking of other things to do than I do actually reading.

    I'm sorry but Nouri's insane and he's harming people and it's only going to get worse.  Especially with his threat to burn the tents in the protest sqaures.

    I do not wake up thinking, "What's going on in Iraq today?"

    I wake up in fear of what Nouri's done this time.

    I dream about death now.  If it's not Iraqis, I've got dead people who were friends showing up in my dreams to tell me Iraq's about to really be set on fire.

    There is no escaping Iraq but I do try to avoid it.

    And I'm sorry for being that way but I pull up a page in fear of what Nouri's done now.

    Hawija?

    We spent days calling it out before it happened.  It was obvious that Nouri was going to resort to violence.


    And we called it out and I yelled and screamed on the phone to friends in the administration to do something and the White House didn't do a damn thing.

    So with Nouri gearing up to let the streets bleed again, I just dread logging on to the computer.  Most mornings, a friend will call about their outlet and I'll finally boot up the laptop after I promise to note whatever they wanted noted.  At that point, I'll force myself to find out what violence Nouri is causing, what hatred he's breeding.

    Yesterday, Nouri's thugs went into MP Ahmed al-Alwani's home, killing people, wounding people (including children) and arresting the MP despite the legal immunity from arrest that he enjoys as a Member of Parliament.  Those deaths are not counted the IBC tally noted above. Speaker of Parliament Osama al-Nujaifi was calling for an investigation into the arrest..


    Tamim al-Jubouri (Al Mada) reports today that the Parliamentary committee tasked with investigating the arrest was unable to do so.  Nouri's SWAT forces refuse to allow these Members of Parliament to leave Baghdad to travel to Anbar and speak to witnesses.  All Iraq News adds that Nouri's spokesperson has denied rumors that he will release al-Alwani.

    Did the State Dept condemn the arrest?

    Of course not.

    They don't give a s**t.

    They really don't.  There are some who do, some individuals.  But the position of the Department itself?

    They don't give a s**t about human rights.

    What do they care about?

    Try to remember that Jen Psaki felt the need to issue a December 25th press release.

    On Christmas Day, the worthless trash wanted to issue a press release on Iraq.

    And Dumb Ass Jen said what?  "We strongly support the efforts by all parties to reach a mutually satisfactory agreement to increase oil exports . . ."

    Psaki, like her betters in the administration, only gives a damn one thing: Oil.

    And they wonder why people see them as such disgusting whores?


    The treachery and whoring from this administration is disgusting and Barack's no longer impersonating Richard Nixon, he's inhabiting him.







    It's over, I'm done writing songs about love
    There's a war going on
    So I'm holding my gun with a strap and a glove
    And I'm writing a song about war
    And it goes
    Na na na na na na na
    I hate the war
    Na na na na na na na
    I hate the war
    Na na na na na na na
    I hate the war
    Oh oh oh oh
    -- "I Hate The War" (written by Greg Goldberg, on The Ballet's Mattachine!)


    The number of US service members the Dept of Defense states died in the Iraq War is [PDF format warning] 4489.



    The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.






















    Prof Boyle Schools Harvard President Faust About Prejudice

    Francis A. Boyle is an attorney and a professor of international law.  He's also the author of many books including, most recently, United Ireland, Human Rights and International Law

    Professor Boyle Schools Harvard President Faust About Prejudice



    Dec. 27, 2013


    Dear President Faust:


    I notice your condemnation of the ASA Boycott against Israel in today's New York Times. I note for the record that Harvard has never once apologized to those of us Harvard Alums who participated in good faith in the Harvard Divestment/Disinvestment Campaign against Israel when your predecessor Larry Summers accused us of being anti-Semitic-- a charge which he refused to defend against me as related below. As a matter of fact, Harvard is so notoriously anti-Palestinian that the late, great Edward Said refused to accept Harvard's top chair in Comparative Literature when Harvard offered it to him. As a loyal Harvard alum I spent an entire evening with Edward at a Chinese Restaurant in Manhattan trying to convince Edward to take this Chair. I thought it would be good for Harvard to have Edward teaching there. As a lawyer and a law professor, I can be quite persuasive. But Edward would have none of my arguments. As Edward saw it, Harvard was so anti-Palestinian that Harvard would have thwarted his intellectual creativity to move there. So Edward stayed at Columbia. Of course Edward was right. And the anti-Palestinian tenor and orientation of Harvard has certainly gotten far worse since when Edward and I were both students at Harvard. Harvard should be doing something about its own longstanding bigotry and racism against the Palestinians. Not criticizing those of us trying to help the Palestinians suffering from Israeli persecution, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and outright genocide.


    Yours very truly,

    Francis A. Boyle
    Professor of Law


    Harvard: JDMCL, AM, PHD, CFIA, Teaching Fellow


    Francis A. Boyle
    Law Building
    504 E. Pennsylvania Ave.
    Champaign, IL 61820 USA


    ************************************

    sent by Francis Boyle - Jul 30, 2007


    The Cowardice of Harvard's Larry Summers


    I'm not going to go through the subsequent history of the divestment/disinvestment movement, except to say that in the late summer of 2002 the President of Harvard, Larry Summers accused those of us Harvard alumni involved in the Harvard divestment campaign of being anti-Semitic.

    After he made these charges, WBUR Radio Station in Boston, which is a National Public Radio affiliate, called me up and said: "We would like you to debate Summers for one hour on these charges, live." And I said, "I'd be happy to do so." They then called up Summers and he refused to debate me.

    Summers did not have the courage, the integrity, or the principles to back up his scurrilous charges. Eventually Harvard fired Summers because of his attempt to impose his Neo-Conservative agenda on Harvard, and in particular his other scurrilous charge that women are dumber than men when it comes to math and science. Well as a Harvard alumnus I say: Good riddance to Larry Summers! (laughter).

    Debating Dershowitz

    WBUR then called me back and said, "Well, since Summers won't debate you, would you debate Alan Dershowitz?" And I said, "Sure." So we had a debate for one hour, live on the radio. And there is a link that you can hear this debate if you want to. I still think it's the best debate out there on this whole issue of Israeli apartheid. Again that would be WBUR Radio Station, Boston, 25 September 2002.

    The problem with the debate, of course, is that Dershowitz knows nothing about international law and human rights. So he immediately started out by saying "well, there's nothing similar to the apartheid regime in South Africa and what Israel is doing to the Palestinians."

    Well the problem with that is that Dershowitz did not know anything at all about even the existence of the Apartheid Convention. That is our second Handout for tonight. [See Handout 2 reprinted below.]

    The definition of apartheid is set out in the Apartheid Convention of 1973.

    And this is taken from my book Defending Civil Resistance Under International Law, Trial Materials on South Africa, published in 1987, that we used successfully to defend anti-apartheid resistors in the United States. If you take a look at the definition of apartheid here found in Article 2, you will see that Israel has inflicted each and every act of apartheid set out in Article 2 on the Palestinians, except an outright ban on marriages between Israelis and Palestinians. But even there they have barred Palestinians living in occupied Palestine who marry Israeli citizens from moving into Israel, and thus defeat the right of family reunification that of course the world supported when Jews were emigrating from the Soviet Union.

    Israel: An Apartheid State

    Again you don't have to take my word for it. There's an excellent essay today on Counterpunch.org by the leading Israeli human rights advocate Shulamit Aloni saying basically: "Yes we have an apartheid state in Israel." Indeed, there are roads in the West Bank for Jews only.

    Palestinians can't ride there and now they're introducing new legislation that Jews cannot even ride Palestinians in their cars.

    This lead my colleague and friend Professor John Dugard who is the U.N. Special rapporteur for human rights in Palestine to write an essay earlier this fall that you can get on Google, saying that in fact Israeli apartheid against the Palestinians is worse than the apartheid that the Afrikaners inflicted on the Blacks in South Africa. Professor Duguard should know.

    He was one of a handful of courageous, white, international lawyers living in South Africa at the time who publicly and internationally condemned apartheid against Blacks at risk to his own life. Indeed, when I was litigating anti-apartheid cases on South Africa, we used Professor Duguard's book on Human Rights and the South African Legal Order as the definitive work explaining what apartheid is all about.

    So Professor Duguard has recently made this statement. Of course President Carter has recently made this statement in his book that Israel is an apartheid state. And certainly if you look at that definition of the Apartheid Convention, right there in front of you, it's clear - there are objective criteria. Indeed if you read my Palestinian book I have a Bibliography at the end with the facts right there based on reputable human rights reports, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, etc. Many of them were also compiled and discussed by my friend Professor Norman Finklestein in his book Beyond Chutzpah, which I'd encourage you to read.

    Francis A. Boyle

    **********************************

    On Point Radio - Sep 25, 2007 broadcast

    Across the country, the push for divestment has spread to more than 40 campuses. The movement condemns Israel for human rights abuses against the Palestinians. Hundreds of big-name academics have signed on, but so far no university has moved to divest.

    The current debate isn't the first time divestment has been used on college campuses as a means to effect social and political change. In the 1980s, the South African divestment campaign helped end apartheid.

    Do you see parallels with the apartheid debate? Has Israel become a trendy target?

    Guests:

    Francis Boyle, professor of international law at The University of Illinois College of Law

    Alan Dershowitz, professor at Harvard Law School

    Taufiq Rahim, student at Princeton University