The
 Russian military operation in Ukraine highlights that the world has 
reached a dangerous fork in the road. It is critically important for 
people in the United States, who are receiving the bulk of their 
information from the capitalist media that functions as an echo chamber 
for the U.S. government, to know that the current crisis is the 
byproduct of a long effort by the United States to establish absolute 
domination throughout Europe. The U.S. policy is aimed at undermining 
Russia’s security by surrounding it with advanced missiles that can 
reach their Russian targets in less than 10 minutes. 
For the last three months, the Russian government simultaneously 
called for negotiations about their security concerns while at the same 
time amassing troops at the Russia-Ukraine border and at the border of 
Ukraine and Belarus. Putin announced that Russia would militarily 
intervene in Ukraine after the United States and NATO rejected their 
fundamental demands that Ukraine not be incorporated into NATO and that 
Ukraine, which shares a 1,200-mile border with Russia, not be used as a 
staging ground for advanced missiles that target Russia. 
In essence, Putin and Russia were demanding that Ukraine be a neutral
 country and never a member of NATO. It was precisely through the 
territory of Ukraine that Russia was subjected to the Nazi invasion of 
World War Two and earlier invasions by Western powers. In World War Two,
 when Ukraine and Russia were one country (the Soviet Union), more than 
27 million people died resisting the Nazi invasion of their homelands. 
At this critical moment, it is imperative that the U.S. government 
change its reckless, provocative stance of encircling Russia and 
relentlessly expanding NATO eastward. Since the dissolution of the 
Soviet Union in 1991, the United States has attempted to incorporate 
almost every former Soviet/Russian European ally into NATO, which is an 
offensive military alliance. 
After having all of its demands rejected by the United States and 
NATO, the Russian government decided to invade Ukraine. As of this 
moment, major military operations are underway. The Russian government 
said it will not occupy Ukraine but that it intends to carry out the 
“demilitarization” and “de-Nazification” of the country. It is unclear 
what these terms actually mean. In some segments of the Ukrainian state –
 particularly the police and military – there is considerable Nazi 
influence. In the political life of Ukraine, the power of fascist groups
 has waned considerably in recent years and they do not exercise 
decisive influence inside of the administration of President Zelenskyy. 
The United States and European powers have vowed to impose a total 
sanctions regime on Russia, cutting the country off from the world 
economy and targeting its most vital industries. An initial volley of 
sanctions was announced by Biden today. These target some of the largest
 banks and corporations in Russia and are especially aimed at limiting 
Russia’s ability to access foreign currency and high tech markets. A 
series of sanctions have already been imposed since 2014, with Russia’s 
incorporation of Crimea after the U.S.-backed coup in Kiev. More 
measures are likely to follow. Taken together, the events of the last 
two days constitute a profound and historic rupture in the existing 
geopolitical order and will have cascading consequences for years to 
come.
A preventable tragedy 
The deadly fighting currently raging across Ukraine is a tragedy. In 
any war, the working class of the nations involved are the ones to bear 
the brunt of the hardship and suffering. From 1922 until the dissolution
 of the Soviet Union the peoples of Ukraine and Russia lived in peace. 
They were partners in a socialist planned economy and together they 
defeated the fascist, Nazi invasion of 1941 at the cost of 27 million 
Soviet lives. The bourgeois-led counter-revolution that dissolved the 
Soviet Union separated the peoples and republics. This animus and 
hostility that followed was the predictable outcome of the end of 
socialism and the beginning of capitalist competition. 
While we do not support the Russian invasion, we reserve our 
strongest condemnation for the U.S. government, which rejected Russia’s 
legitimate security concerns in the region, with total intransigence 
that they knew could provoke such a war. This is the consequence of 
decades of U.S.-NATO bullying and humiliating Russia. The Party for 
Socialism and Liberation demands that the U.S. government and its allies
 in the imperialist NATO military alliance immediately cease their 
provocative behavior designed to escalate the crisis and provide 
security guarantees that can be the foundation for the restoration of 
peace – the cornerstone of which must be a pledge to end NATO expansion.
 This is what can bring relief to the people of Ukraine. 
A highly explosive situation has been developing in Eastern Europe 
not only in recent weeks and months, but for many years. What happened 
last night and the terrible violence to come was preventable, but 
decisions made by NATO powers at every key juncture since the end of the
 Cold War set the region on a collision course that was bound to come to
 a head sooner or later.
Since the breakup of the Soviet Union and the socialist camp of 
Eastern Europe, the imperialist NATO military alliance has steadily 
expanded eastward, absorbing 14 formerly socialist states between 1999 
and 2020. Three of these countries — Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia — 
were former republics of the Soviet Union itself. In 2008, a war broke 
out between Russia and Western-allied Georgia after Georgian forces 
attacked the pro-Russia breakaway region of South Ossetia. 
In 2014, a coup supported by the West took place in Ukraine that 
replaced the neutral government of Viktor Yanukovych with a staunchly 
anti-Russia government. This coup created the essential preconditions 
for the current crisis and war. It did not come out of nowhere in the 
last few months. Under the Trump administration, the United States 
withdrew from the Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces Treaty and the Open 
Skies Treaty, which were cornerstones of the arms control architecture 
of Europe. 
Actions elsewhere in the world compounded the tensions. In 2011, NATO
 carried out the destruction of Libya on the basis of UN Security 
Council resolution 1973 – which Russia allowed to pass based on false 
assurances from the West that it would not be used to justify a regime 
change operation. Around the same time, a civil war broke out in Syria, a
 close Russian ally. Russia intervened in Syria militarily to prevent 
U.S.-backed reactionary fundamentalist forces from seizing control of 
the country. 
A turning point in world politics
The speech given by Vladimir Putin last night announcing the invasion
 made it clear that he was prepared for an intense and long-term 
confrontation with the West. Starting with the NATO bombing of 
Yugoslavia in 1999, Putin listed a litany of aggressive actions by the 
West and called on all segments of Russian society – military and 
non-military – to do their part in the coming mobilization, which 
undoubtedly will involve profound economic turmoil inside of Russia. 
Putin’s intention appears to be to change the balance of forces in 
Europe and turn the geopolitical tide with a major military 
intervention. 
The plight of ethnic Russians, especially those in the Donbas region 
of Eastern Ukraine, factored heavily into the speech delivered by Putin,
 which was directed towards the Russian public. Putin has been outspoken
 in recent days about his opposition to the Soviet policy on 
nationalities and considers the creation of modern Ukraine to have been a
 grave error on the part of Vladimir Lenin. As the PSL pointed out in 
our Feb. 22 statement:
“[T]he policy promoted by Lenin was the cornerstone of maintaining 
peaceful relations and unity among the peoples of the Soviet Union from 
the Russian Revolution until the beginning of the USSR’s collapse. By 
organizing the new, socialist state along the lines of the right to 
self-determination, Lenin was striking a blow at what was called “Great 
Russian chauvinism” — the domination of the Russian state and the 
Russian nationality in the territory of the just-overthrown Russian 
empire. Along with the administrative transfer of territories, this was a
 way of ensuring that the peoples of the newly formed socialist state 
could live together in peace and equality, replacing the brutal 
domination characteristic of the Czar’s regime. The principle of 
self-determination laid the basis for multinational unity that was the 
foundation of the Soviet Union’s great successes — for instance, 4.5 
million Ukrainians fought alongside Russians to defeat fascism in World 
War II.” 
There is no guarantee that Russia’s effort to reverse the 
geopolitical situation in its favor will succeed. So far, the events of 
the past several days have allowed U.S. imperialism to secure key 
objectives. The critical NordStream 2 pipeline that would have brought 
massive amounts of Russian gas into the European market is no longer 
going forward. NATO troops have been and will continue to flood into the
 Eastern European members of the alliance, including the Baltic 
countries that share a border with Russia. Just today, the Pentagon 
announced that it was sending 7,000 additional soldiers to Europe. While
 Russia clearly aims to install a friendly government in power in Kiev, 
public support inside of Ukraine for the country’s membership in NATO – 
which has never been a completely dominant position – will undoubtedly 
surge in the aftermath of the invasion.
The conflict currently exploding in Ukraine and rippling throughout 
the region and the entire world is hugely dangerous. The reckless and 
provocative actions of the U.S. government and its allies must cease 
immediately. The economic warfare being unleashed against Russia – which
 will first and foremost affect the country’s working class – will only 
deepen the crisis, as would troop deployments anywhere in Europe. 
Recognizing that Russia has legitimate security concerns does not 
require an endorsement of all its military actions, nor Putin’s 
suggestion that Ukraine has no basis to exist as an independent county, 
nor his larger geopolitical strategies. The role of the U.S. anti-war 
movement is not to follow the line of countries in conflict with U.S. 
imperialism, but to present an independent program of peace and 
solidarity and anti-imperialism.
The menace of war can only be defeated by international solidarity 
among the peoples of the world and a resolute struggle against U.S. 
imperialism, which must demand the abolition of NATO. No war on Russia!