Thursday, February 13, 2025. What the press missed about Chump's announcement in front of King Abdullah II, DSA's gunning for Hakeem Jeffries (and lying again), Jill Stein's campaign has been revealed as the fraud we all knew it was, and much more.
Let's start this morning with the campaign of known grifter Jill Stein.
Jill Stein’s campaign manager just admitted what anyone with half a brain knew all along—their real mission was to help elect Donald Trump. Fu*k Jill Stein and anyone who supported her
— Republicans Against Trumpism (@rpsagainsttrump.bsky.social) February 11, 2025 at 9:46 AM
[image or embed]
It was all performative. It was all pretense. And now that they've put Chump back in the White House, they admit to it and see it as a success.
.
They had so much help . . . from non-Democrats. Remember when Kyle and Krystal were pimping Jill Stein? THE VANGUARD boys. Amy Goodman
So many, many more. In fact, you just have to look at who trashed Medhi Hasan for asking actual questions in the interview he did with Jill and little "Butchy" Ware -- I forget his real first name but so has he.
Immigrants are suffering now, LGBTQ+ people are suffering now, the country is suffering now and it's only going to get worse but the Green Party, via Jill's campaign manager, has made clear that they did the right thing --- what they'd planned to do all along -- by putting Chump back into the White House.
There are not your friends.
THE VANGUARD's blowing sloppy kisses to Saagar.
That's how they're helping the country?
A known homophobe and transphobe and they're blowing kisses to him.
I remember when nut job Marianne Williamson went on Bill Maher's podcast as part of her never ending and always failing bid to et the 2024 presidential nomination.
I do not watch trash TV. That's how I have never stumbled across Bill Maher on any network -- not COMEDY CENTRAL, not ABC, not HBO.
But THE VANGUARD boyz watch Bill and they did some clips of Marianne's visit to Bill's podcast and praised her.
For?
When Bill Maher started trashing trans people, Marianne did the right thing.
That's what Zac and Gavin insisted.
The wrong thing?
To defend trans people. No, Marianne stayed silent and "focused" and ignored it and just made the points she wanted to make.
Zac and Gavin, I try to be kind due to your young age but surely even you now realize that Marianne was never, ever going to get the nomination and that it was surely more important for Marianne to stand up to transphobia in that moment in time.
If she had, she might have even got some support.
Ava and I covered this at THIRD -- see "Media: Marianne's campaigning for right wingers, Cornel's trying to destroy The Green Party." How her 2020 effort found her embracing LGBTQ+ rights and doing it over and over -- including on Twitter -- but how in her campaign for 2024, she wasn't just silent in the face of attacks on trans people, she was also silent on Twitter and every platform.
Let's be really clear that after her actions during the AIDS crisis, Marianne will always have a lot to answer for.
But she went to Krystal and Kyle's wedding and that's all that mattered, right?
The Green Party has now made clear that the whole point of Jill Stein's campaign was to get Chump back in the White House.
That should lead to outrage. People should be outraged over the soft ball interview that Amy and Juan conducted with Jill and Little Butchy.
Her whole goal -- as many of us pointed out in real time -- was to hand the White House to Chump. Her own children who opposed her run noted that was her goal. Now her campaign manager has admitted it as well.
A lot of people have to answer for that.
And again don't come at me with numbers. I hate the stupid idiots who think they understand campaign politics. How many campaigns have you been a part of? How many classes did you take in campaign politics (international relations and campaign politics were the two fields of poli sci I emphasized for my undergraduate and my graduate work). Jill was there to poison perception -- the same thing Amy Goodman did every day on DEMOCRACY NOW!
As I have noted repeatedly: We have the numbers. Forget the Greens, forget the closet Socialists. We have the numbers. We can elect Democrats. But we have to turn out.
That's why the GOP, every damn year, is focused nation-wide and state-wide on how to reduce our access to the ballot. Because we have the numbers.
That's why, if we turn out, we win.
Jill Stein's garbage and Rahsida's and all the closet case Socialists was about defeating Kamala. They had to create the perception that she wasn't worth voting for to try to keep some people home. Voting's hard for a lot of people. There are those with children -- not just young children, trying havind middle school kids in sports and other school activities -- there are those who can't drive themselves, there are those who work the graveyard shift. There are so many things so many peoople are dealing with.
And if I've stayed up all night in the hospital with a loved one and I can now go home to sleep right away or I can go vote? I'm tired, I'm drifting off and if you're giving me any reason to think my vote doesn't matter or the person's not going to fight for me, I'm going home to sleep.
That's what they did, they poisoned the well. They screwed with perception. And still Chump didn't get 50% of the vote. Because Kamala ran a great campaign and I'm not in the mood for a closet case named Sam Seder to say otherwise.
Yesterday's snapshot led to whining in the public e-mail. "So we can't even criticize Hakeem Jeffries?"
If you're asking me, what you can't do is read. I don't know why that is? Could be a learning disorder (I'm dyslexic) or maybe you're just too damn lazy. But clearly you can't read:
We were calling out the trickery that the usual con artists were pulling. They couldn't attack Hakeem with the truth so they selectively edited a statement from a public press conference. And this is how stupid the DSA thinks Americans are -- a public press conference. They didn't expect that anyone would pull it up to see what they done. Tabitha did right away. And she documented on camera which is why we put her video in there.
In a minute, we'll be noting an issue regarding Gaza that apparently everyone missed. My excuse is that I don't cover it anymore. But every day there's so much to cover. Yesterday, what I missed was how useless DSA is.
Yes, I noted their edit but I was on the phone with a friend discussing it last night when I talked about how wasteful DSA is (he's a former DSA-er, by the way) and how they distract from real issues and pointed out what a waste of time attacks on Hakeem were. And how Hakeem is not losing his job and --
Yeah, that's what I forgot in my rush yesterday.
Hakeem is the Minority Leader. That vote already went down. They're trying to bloody him -- the DSA is -- and they're pretending that they can take him down.
No, they can't.
And their notion seems to be that AOC then replaces him.
No.
The Democratic Party, bound and determined to win the 2026 mid-terms, is not going to put AOC in charge of the House Democrats. She's a Socialist. She and DSA are having problems but she remains a Socialist. And I'm so sorry for the Ed Wood crowd of the left but Socialism doesn't get votes.
That's your fault if you are a DSA-er because you hide and lie. It's your job to educate the American people on Socialism, not mine. You hide and you lie and you trick.
Again, the SEP doesn't hide in a closet. Other Socialists don't hide in closets.
But this is one more example of what a waste of time DSA is. They decided to selectively edit Hakeem speaking to make him look bad and sew dissension and told the idiots stupid enough to believe them that it was time for Hakeem to go!!!!
Hakeem's not going anywhere. He's the Minority Leader. That could change in a year or two. But he's the leader.
There's so much that we need to work on to save our country. Instead, we've go the DSA conning people into believing they can knock Hakeem out and replace him with a Socialist like AOC or Rahsida or Greg Casar.
And we noted Greg all the time. The minute Rashida ran into trouble we posted everything her office issued. When Cori Bush ran into trouble, the same.
The difference now is that DSA actively worked to destroy to Kamala's campaign.
If they'd done that to Hillary (and to a degree, they did), I would've just shrugged and focused on the next election. But this wasn't an unknown. We knew it was Chump or Kamala, we knew Chump was a convicted criminal who led an insurrection against the country and who would rule out of hate and fear and try to destroy our country.
That's the difference now. I love the Michigan Green Party but I've ignored everything they've sent in the last two weeks. I'm just not in the mood.
I was happy to promote all on the left. Up until you worked to destroy our country.
Chump was not an unknown. He was a very real threat and when we needed to pull together? A number of you worked instead to put him back in the White House.
That's unforgivable.
What you have done to this country is unforgivable. The lives that are being destroyed because of your actions and lies is unforgivable.
This is not "Oh my preferred candidate didn't win!" This is: You actively worked to put this country into a dangerous situation that could lead to our destruction.
That is not forgivable.
Some e-mails to the public account say that Hakeem's got to go because he's complaining in private about pressure being put on him.
Oh, the horror!
He's complaining?
I feel so insulted!!!!
Of course he's complaining. We're his boss. We're on his ass. We're demanding he get to work.
I don't know what kind of Frank Capra lunatic world you live in (one that lets you overlook the fact that Capra was a government snitch, for one thing) but politicians complain about the people they represent all the time. And that's fine. As long as they get that we're the boss, not them.
This isn't, 'Hey, if you can, stay about 15 minutes late and try to get three or four calls done.' This is: You work for us, start defending us.
And if he's pissed -- he may not be, that's an anonymouse story -- great. And work to get him more pissed so he knows he has to answer to us. That is politics.
Let's note Rachel Maddow from last night on MSNBC.
I'm trying to let the Gaza Freaks cover Gaza. I did my part and I'm not really in the mood these days. But I was on the phone last night with a friend (news producer -- not at MSNBC) and he was asking my thoughts on a recent event. I shared my take. He said no one covered that. A huge event at the White House and no one covered it. So I said I'd mention it here (he's a TV producer, the moment has passed, they've moved on as TV does).
Pablo R. Suanzes (EL MUNDO) reports:
The US President insists that it is easy, "and two million people is a small number," while Abdullah avoids committing but also contradicting him to avoid losing $1.5 billion in annual aid.
Faces of circumstance, uncomfortable silences, and evasions. King Abdullah II of Jordan traveled to Washington this week, met with Donald Trump at the White House, and has a lot at stake. And that's why the situation could not have been more uncomfortable when the President of the United States, in response to journalists' questions, insisted on his plans for the Gaza Strip, which include Jordan, an important ally in the region, voluntarily or involuntarily hosting millions of Gazans, who would be illegally expelled from their land forever, as Trump said this past weekend, without considering their right to return.
Trump reiterated on Tuesday that Washington will take control of Gaza and will not back down. With what authority will all this be done? "With that of the United States," he stated. "It's not something complex to do. And with the United States in control of that piece of land, a fairly large piece of land, we will have stability in the Middle East for the first time," Trump declared from the Oval Office.
When pressed, given that he described it in terms of real estate operation, if it was part of his plans to do business personally, the President stated that it was not because "I have had a great career in the real estate sector," he said laughing. "We are not going to buy, there is nothing to buy. It is a devastated place. We are going to take control, manage [Gaza], preserve it, and give it value. It could be a diamond," he added, attacking Hamas, whom he described as "bullies and weak" and reiterating that they have a clear ultimatum to continue releasing the Israeli hostages from October 7.
There was reporting soon after that the White House had not done “even the most basic planning to examine the feasibility of the idea.” Instead, Trump just blurted out his radical thought, failing to even alert the State Department or the Pentagon in advance.
As confusion reigned at the White House, Trump apparently thought he could help clear things up with a 107-word missive published to his social media platform. In it, the Republican said Gaza “would be turned over to the United States” — he didn’t say how, when or why — and Palestinians would be “resettled” in some other countries that he didn’t identify.
A day later, after threatening to cut off U.S. aid to Jordan and Egypt, Trump met with Jordan’s King Abdullah II at the White House, and went even further.
President Donald Trump’s attack on South Africa has brought relations between Washington and Pretoria to their lowest point since sanctions were imposed on the previous apartheid government in 1986.
In South Africa, this row comes seven months into a coalition government that is testing the ability of the former liberation movement, the African National Congress (ANC), to work with its partner, the strongly pro-Western Democratic Alliance (DA), which represents about 90% of white voters.
Ramaphosa’s ANC chose the DA over the third and fourth largest parties, which are black, anti-Western breakaways from the ANC that accuse the president of failing to address historic black land claims. Under this intense political pressure, the ANC produced an Expropriation Act it hoped would satisfy all sides.
The coalition government’s success depends on whether it can restore economic growth and reverse rising joblessness after 15 years of stagnation.
If anyone feels noting the above three stories on South Africa is 'a little much,' maybe they went to school with Eoin Higgins?
Because the above is not minor. His whole attitude reeks of White privilege. Such as when he's failing to grasp that Thiel's support of Ron Paul was not despite of Paul's well known racism but actually because of the politician's well known racism. Equally true, he never notes the racist connection of rich supporters of Donald Chump to South Africa. Or that, for example, Elon leaves South Africa because apartheid is falling. Instead, he -- and Thiel -- just happen o leave South Africa, the country that has allowed them to benefit their entire life from their White skin while discriminating against Black people. The attacks on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion is briefly noted in terms of when Musk took over Twitter and was appalled by the diversity he sees in the company's work force. Higgins treats it as a quirk when, in fact, it's a built-in factory feature of three White men (Musk, Thiel and Sacks) spending their formative years in an apartheid state that fed and deepened their bigotry and hate.
Isaiah's THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS "Lincoln Hater" and "I Have Two Daddies" went up last night. The following sites updated: