Wednesday, September 03, 2025

The Snapshot

Wednesday, September 3, 2025.  Epstein survivors to hold press conference this morning, Speaker of the Closet Mike Johnson thinks he can trick people, Chump can't escape the Epstein topic anymore than he can stop the decaying of his own flesh, and much more.


At the end of the 80s, Donald Chump began his friendships with sex traffickers and pedophiles Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.  This friendship lasted until at least 2007.  Chump was very cozy with Epstein and having recently moved Ghislaine Maxwell to Club Fed in Bryan, Texas, he clearly remains tight with Maxwell.  

If you don't get just how disgusting the deal he made with Ghislaine was or just how Todd Blanche refused to ask questions of Maxwell during their two days of 'interviews,' make a point to stream the video below from THE LAST WORD WITH LAWRENCE O'DONNELL.


We should all be appalled at the way Todd Blanche kissed the ass of a convicted felon serving a 20 year sentence for sex trafficking.  A convicted felon was allowed to lie repeatedly and was never once challenged.  But she was laughed with, Blanche laughed with her and made her feel comfortable as she lied non-stop.

Last night, Ben did a very important report for MEIDASTOUCH NEWS.






The reason it feels like Congress doesn’t exist anymore is because it functionally doesn’t, but also because this summer vacation was extended. House Republicans tucked tail and left early after fearing the possibility of having to vote for transparency about the biggest underage sex ring in U.S. history, which gives you a good sense of where we are with that party right now.

House Speaker Mike Johnson had six weeks to figure out how to manage the intra-party rebellion over the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. Republican members were still getting an earful at home, so ducking a vote wasn’t practical. But Johnson needed to uphold his prime directive of acting as a human shield for the president and keeping his name out of any revelations.

So after weeks of rumination, here’s what Johnson came up with: a resolution, hastily added to the week’s floor voting schedule on Monday, that would “direct” the House Oversight Committee to continue investigating the federal cases against Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, which is already in progress. In other words, Johnson would have the House vote to do something it is effectively already doing.

The word you may be grasping for is “misdirection.”

This resolution is being floated for a vote to keep people away from a bipartisan bill from Reps. Ro Khanna (D-CA) and Tom Massie (R-KY), which would directly compel the relevant government agencies to release all relevant files. Yesterday, Khanna and Massie launched the discharge petition process for their bill. If it gets signatures from a majority of House members, that bill will have to come to the floor, and the co-authors say they already have that many in hand. They’re holding a press conference this morning with victims of Epstein’s sex ring.

Johnson’s gambit is to claim that he’s already giving supporters of releasing the files a vote, so they shouldn’t have to sign onto the discharge petition. That is the hard sell that both the House Republican leadership and the White House, which is apparently whipping members to not sign onto the discharge petition, are making.

This is as much about Johnson controlling what gets on his House floor (which could trigger other bypass attempts, like on a congressional stock trading ban), but it’s based on a misimpression that the “attaboy Oversight Committee” resolution is the same as the Khanna-Massie bill.

Let's stop for a moment to deal with something of a housekeeping issue.


Why would I post that -- as I did yesterday?

It was not  private video when I posted it.

I also was asked to post it by a friend with PBS.  

At some point, PBS decided to pull it.  I have no idea why  I woke up to find a ton of e-mails this morning about that video and why did I post it?

I posted it mainly because a PBS friend asked me to.

I probably won't post their stuff anymore.

I want to support PBS -- we've increased posting them here since Chump cut off funding.

But I didn't like this crap when b.s. artist Katie Halper pulled it.  I certainly don't like it when PBS pulls this nonsense.


If you search the title of the PBS video in GOOGLE, you'll get this.




And clicking on that takes you to the renamed reports "What’s in the batch of Epstein files just released by a House committee" at THE NEWSHOUR.  Here's the transcript of the video they released and then a few hour later killed.


  • Amna Nawaz:

    Welcome to the "News Hour."

    Congress is back in Washington tonight, and the clock is already ticking. Lawmakers have less than one month to avoid a government shutdown.

  • Geoff Bennett:

    On the table, a fierce fight over billions in spending cuts, some 30,000 pages worth of Jeffrey Epstein-related files that Republicans just posted tonight online, and the Senate moving to fast-track President Trump's nominees.

    Our congressional correspondent, Lisa Desjardins, joins us now.

    So, Lisa, it's always great to see you.

    Let's start with the possible government shutdown at the end of the month. We are weeks away. How likely is it?

  • Lisa Desjardins:

    It is possible.

    Let's take people through exactly how this is going to work, what we know. First of all, the deadline is September 30 to fund most of government. Now, any deal needs 60 Senate votes. So, of course, that means likely at least seven Democrats would have to get on board.

    Now, that's led to this situation where, of course, Democrats know they have leverage here. They don't have leverage in a lot of cases. House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries today told reporters, including myself, that he's looking for a bipartisan solution. But what that really means is, he wants some concessions.

  • Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY):

    That spending bill has to be both bipartisan, a product of negotiation, and it's got to serve the interests of the American people in terms of their health, safety, national security, and economic well-being.

  • Lisa Desjardins:

    Health, safety, national security, economic, that covers everything. So, there's a lot on the table for him.

    And this is the man really to watch, Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer. It's his vote that Republicans will need to get a funding bill through, or it could be his decision to try to go all the way to a government shutdown. It is very much on the table, a risky decision for Democrats either way.

    The pressure is on them to stand up to President Trump, try and get some policy changes. But some Democrats say a shutdown might benefit Trump.

  • Geoff Bennett:

    And why are they feeling the pressure this week, Lisa?

  • Lisa Desjardins:

    Right.

    It seems like the 30th is a long way away. It's not. One reason is because, in the middle of the month, there will be a recess, a full week. So really it's just about two or three weeks they have. And, remember, they're only in town three days a week mostly.

  • Geoff Bennett:

    Let's talk about the other big news tonight.

    The House Oversight Committee released tens of thousands of pages of documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. There had been Republicans calling for more transparency, and this appears to be a step in that direction?

  • Lisa Desjardins:

    Right.

    And a reminder, we're talking about Jeffrey Epstein. He's the financier accused of sex crimes. His conspirator, Ghislaine Maxwell, was sent to prison for those crimes. He also was connected with many high-profile individuals, friends with Donald Trump, though Trump has disavowed him since.

    Here's what we got tonight, documents like this, 33,000-plus pages of them. But I want to point out, this document, our producer Matt Loffman quickly figured out, is public. This is not something that is special to the Department of Justice. This is something you could find on the Supreme Court's Web site. This is Ghislaine Maxwell's — part of her appeal case.

    So a lot of this are legal documents. Going through them, we really don't know how much of it is new. But I am told from House Oversight Republicans that these are all the documents that DOJ has given them so far.

    Democrats have said, first of all, that these 34,000 documents is just 1 percent of the total. Now, Republicans are worried about something else going on. That's a bipartisan effort by two — two Republican — two members of Congress, Democratic Representative Ro Khanna there on the right and then Thomas Massie of Kentucky. They are trying to make an end run around House leadership to force release of all documents, make them all public.

    But the question is if the votes are there. And, today, Speaker Johnson made it clear he doesn't want that effort. And I think this release tonight is an attempt to try and take votes away from that end run, so a lot in play. Do we know that much more about Jeffrey Epstein tonight? Not yet. We will see.

  • Geoff Bennett:

    Yes. Well, more to come on that front.


  • Again, I don't have time for people's bulls**t or their cowrdice.

    I counted fifty e-mails in the public account.  I don't have time for that, Martha and Shirley don't have time for that.  If you make my life harder, I don't give a damn about you.

    I'll get a call from at least two PBS friends when this goes up and I know they'll have 101 excuses.  But I don't give a damn.  You've made my morning harder and it's just not worth it to me to promote you or your work if you're going to be a little coward and pull it.  Related.  It's Wednesday.  Will Ava and I do a piece at THIRD?  Probably not.  Everyone else got Labor Day weekend off.  But were supposed to now do -- on a Wednesday -- a media piece?  I've got enough on my plate.  It's Wednesday  We'll do one this weekend but neither of us is in the mood to spend three to four hours writing a piece today.


    Let's get back to Epstein and Maxwell.  Nicole Charky-Chami (RAW STORY) noted yesterday:


    Republican Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) plans to take steps Tuesday to push for a vote to release the Jeffrey Epstein files — and suggested a shadowy billionaire in the famous "black book" is out to get him.

    Lawmakers are back from summer recess, and Massie and Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) were expected to file a discharge petition aimed at compelling the Department of Justice to fully release all files related to the disgraced financier's case. The bipartisan effort is underway from the House Oversight Committee to uncover the files despite pushback from Republican leaders.
    "Jobs, the economy, those are always the big issues, but you really can't solve any of that if this place is corrupt," Massie told CNN.
    CNN reporter Manu Raju asked, "What do you mean, if this place is corrupt?"

    "Well, I mean, if they're going to cover up for rich and powerful and politically connected people, which is still what is happening right now here," Massie said.

    Massie, who has faced off with House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) and the Trump administration over calling for the release of the files, continues to face attacks.

    "Look, I got three billionaires right now running ads against me in Kentucky, and one of them is in Epstein's black book. So I'm not worried about it," Massie said. "I've already poked the hornet's nest here, and, you know, once you're in for a penny, you're in for a pound. We're going to get these files released."


    First, Isn't Alien Musk financing commercials against Massie, by the way.  Musk had a very tight relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. 

    Second, "we're going to get these files released"? 

    Not if Speaker of the Closet Mike Johnson has anything to say about it.  Ailia Zehra noted Johnson does want a discharge effort to succeed:

    House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) pushed back Tuesday against the bipartisan effort led by Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) to force release of the files related to convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, dismissing the effort as "meaningless."

    “I would describe virtually everything Thomas Massie says related to this issue as meaningless. That’s my response," he told reporters on Capitol Hill Tuesday.



    House GOP leaders on Tuesday morning added to this week’s House schedule a vote on a resolution directing the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee to continue its investigation into matters surrounding convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

    The addition comes as leaders contend with an alternative push to force a vote on a bill that would direct the Trump administration to release more Epstein material.


    What's going on?  The discharge voice would demand all the paperwork.  Speaker of the Closet Johnson won't be able to run interference on behalf of the White House if the discharge option is implemented.  The only way he can cover for Donald Chump is by ensuring that the House votes to continue down the same road.  That would be the wasted road that resulted in the Dept of (Mis)Justice releasing to Congress last month . . . papers already publicly available as the Democrats on the House Oversight Committee noted in a press release yesterday:

    Washington, D.C. — Rep. Robert Garcia, Ranking Member of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, issued the following statement after Chairman James Comer released to the public the partial batch of Epstein files from the Department of Justice, consisting largely of already public information. The original partial release failed to meet the Department’s legal obligation to provide the full, unredacted documents to the Committee while protecting victims and censoring child sexual abuse materials. 

    “The 33,000 pages of Epstein documents James Comer has decided to ‘release’ were already mostly public information. To the American people – don’t let this fool you.

    After careful review, Oversight Democrats have found that 97% of the documents received from the Department of Justice were already public. There is no mention of any client list or anything that improves transparency or justice for victims.

    House Republicans are trying to make a spectacle of releasing already-public documents. Pam Bondi has said the client list was on her desk. She could release it right now if she wanted to. 

    While Comer tries to give cover to Trump by re-releasing public documents, House Democrats are fighting for real transparency. Pam Bondi must comply with our subpoena immediately, and release all of the documents. The American people demand it.”

    Oversight Committee Democrats’ initial review revealed that of the 33,295 pages of documents released to the Committee, only three percent contained any new information. The remaining 97% of pages included information previously released by the Department of Justice, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement or the Palm Beach County State Attorney’s office.

    These include: 

    • Video from the Metropolitan Correctional Center from the night of Epstein’s death 
    • Supreme Court filings from Ghislaine Maxwell
    • Court filings from U.S. v. Maxwell
    • Court transcript from U.S. v. Maxwell
    • A Department of Justice Office of Inspector General Report on Epstein’s death
    • A memo from Attorney General Pamela Bondi to FBI Director Kash Patel on releasing the Epstein files 
    • Communications between the Bureau of Prisons and the Department of Justice regarding the death of Epstein 
    • Police reports and court filings from Epstein’s criminal case in Florida

    The only new disclosure:

    • Less than 1,000 pages from the Customs and Border Protection’s log of flight locations of the Epstein plane from 2000-2014 and forms consistent with reentry back to the U.S. 

    ###




    Johnson thinks he can con people.  I don't know about that.  

     

    This morning MEIDASTOUCH NEWS already has a video up about the press conference later this morning and Ben notes that MTN will be streaming it live on YOUTUBE. The press conference is supposed to start around 10:30 this morning EST.

     



    Yesterday, NBC NEWS spoke with some Epstein survivors.






    On Tuesday, US President Donald Trump made a first public official appearance in the Oval Office after a short disappearance this weekend, with many remarking on his 'rough' look.

    About 45 minutes late for his own 2 p.m. Oval Office press conference to announce that U.S. Space Command will be located in Alabama, reversing a Biden-era decision to keep it at its temporary headquarters in Colorado, he kept his speech unusually short. While Trump is often very late for his scheduled events, this one comes after 'death' rumors swirled over the weekend, with many questioning the President's health.
    One liberal political commentator pointed out, "He looks rough and more orange than normal. Wonder if the press will ask the important question of why he was absent for a week." It comes after a Trump body double conspiracy theory emerged.

    [. . .]

    More users began to point out Trump's look as he made the announcement. "His eyes are still funky. Somethings wrong," one person said. Another added, "Looks like it took an extra 50 minutes to make him look alert and camera ready."

    Another person pointed out that Trump's hands has more makeup than usual, as he has been warned lately about the bruises on his hands being a warning sign of something worse. "He looks rough. Extra hand makeup applied," they wrote.


     


    Marcia covers Chump's health and did so again last night in "Chump "looks like a ham left out in the sun"."  There's a story that popped up and she either missed it or it popped up after she wrote so we'll note it here.  Matt Richards (OK!) reports:


    Donald Trump sparked more concerns over his health during a Tuesday, September 2, interview with Scott Jennings.

    “I’m always disappointed in him,” a very stuffy Trump said when discussing Russian President Vladimir Putin. “He and I always had a great relationship. Very disappointed. Thousands of people are dying.”
    [. . .]

    X users were quick to pipe in, with one saying it “backs the stroke hypothesis” as “stroke patients can sound ‘nasally’ due to dysarthria and muscle weakness impacting the soft palate.”

    “They sound ‘strained,’ ‘hoarse’ and ‘nasal or hyponasal,’” they continued. “So his voice actually continues to support the mild stroke position.”

    “He’s struggling to breathe,” another person said. “Respiratory issues are indicative of a stroke. This along with his edema (swelling of the ankles) and cardiac problems are signs that the end is imminent.”

    Another person surmised Trump has COVID, which would he explain why “he sounds congested."


    Let's talk about Jane Fonda.  In the 80s, as she built her Workout franchise -- and made a lot of money for the CED and, later, Campaign for California, certain Republicans got a British rag to run a lie (the publication knew it was a lie) that she'd had a heart attack.  The day after that lie hit the press, Jane showed up at one of her studios and invited the press as she led a Workout class to show that, no, she had not had a heart attack.  

    So where was Chump's workout?  No where to be found.  If he had a stroke -- and he may have -- or if he didn't, nothing he did in public on Tuesday dispels those rumors.

    Jane grasped that certain right-wingers in this country feared her popularity and the money she was raising for solid causes.  So she put an end to the lie immediately by providing proof that she was healthy and photos ran in papers around the world while videos of that morning's workout made all the news programs like GOOD MORNING AMERICA.

    That's how she ended a lie.


    Somehow, Chump either didn't care that much about what people were saying about him (which is a first for him) or he's unable to prove he didn't have a stroke.

    I have no idea.  I've never been one of his groupies so I have no reason to lie for him.  



    Let's wind down with this from Senator Elizabeth Warren's office:

    Washington, D.C. — Following a new D.C. District Court ruling in the landmark antitrust case involving Google, U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) released the following statement:

    “The court previously ruled that Google’s search business is an illegal monopoly, but now the judge’s remedies fail to hold Google accountable for breaking the law. Instead of restoring competition and ending Google’s dominance, this ruling is a slap on the wrist for unlawful behavior that warranted the breakup of this tech giant.

    “Now it’s up to the Trump Justice Department and state attorneys general to appeal or risk emboldening even more lawbreaking by Big Tech monopolies.

    “While the Trump Justice Department considers an appeal to break up Google, YouTube and Google executives are negotiating with Trump’s lawyers to settle a dubious case for potentially millions of dollars and raising serious concerns of corruption in plain sight.”

    ###




    The following sites updated: