My remarks will focus on one exposure issue that is very personal to me – the contaminated drinking water at Camp Lejeune in my home state of North Carolina. I know we’ll hear from several witnesses about this issue, but I’d also like to acknowledge two former Marines, Jerry, who is here today, and David Briscoe, who could not be here. They both lived on Camp Lejeune during the years the water was contaminated and have their own painful stories.
David, who lived on Camp Lejeune in the 1980s, was later diagnosed with cancer of the hard palate and underwent treatment that reduced his ability to eat, speak, and work. Jerry’s daughter, who was born on Camp Lejeune in 1975, was diagnosed with leukemia at the age of six and, tragically, died three years later. Jerry, I commend your personal strength in the face of such tragedy and appreciate you being here.
Unfortunately, Jerry’s and David’s heart-wrenching stories are not unique for veterans who served on Camp Lejeune between 1957 and 1987. The residents of Camp Lejeune didn’t know it at the time, but the water they were drinking, cooking with, and bathing in contained harmful chemicals – including TCE, PCE, benzene, and vinyl chloride -- which are known or probable human carcinogens.
Some of them are now living with rare cancers, like one of our witnesses today, Mike Partain. He is the son of a Marine, a former resident of Camp Lejeune, and one of over 20 former Lejeune residents diagnosed with rare male breast cancer at an unusually young age – he was just 39 years old. This condition usually strikes less than 2,000 men each year in the U.S. and most are over age 55.
Although a number of studies have suggested a possible link between the water at Camp Lejeune and these types of conditions, we still don’t have an answer about what made Jerry’s daughter, or Mike, or David sick or what has caused other former Lejeune residents to become ill.
The government’s role in scientific discovery is clear. Camp Lejeune was designated by the EPA as a National Priority List site. Under Title 42 of the US Code, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry is conducting a number of studies of the Camp Lejeune contamination. These studies include sophisticated computer modeling and future mortality and health surveys. It would have been valuable to have ATSDR here so that they could respond to testimony being given by our witnesses and answer questions from this Committee. Mr. Chairman, in order to strike a balance of scientific opinion on this important issue, I ask that ATSDR’s official response to the National Research Council’s report on Camp Lejeune be included in the record.
We have an obligation to figure out how much of these dangerous chemicals veterans and their families were exposed to at Camp Lejeune and what impact these exposures have had on their health. For these patriots who have endured unbearable heartache and suffering, they deserve no less than our best efforts to provide them with answers about why they are sick. Also, we must make sure that the claims these families have pending are not prematurely denied by the government before science has had the opportunity to provide more answers.
But, while we wait for the science, we must deal with the fact that many of these exposed veterans and their families continue to suffer from devastating conditions. It is simply not right for us to continue to tell our veterans and their families to just wait for another study. They have already waited two decades. We owe them much more than that.
Julio Herrera Velutini really wanted a pardon.
A billionaire banker from a prominent Venezuelan family, Mr. Herrera faced felony bribery charges in the United States and struck an unusually lenient plea deal in August 2025 for a misdemeanor campaign finance violation. But he felt that reduced charge was still a stain on his record.
So Mr. Herrera deployed his lawyer, Christopher M. Kise, the former Florida solicitor general who was on Mr. Trump’s personal legal team, to help with a plea for clemency. His 27-year-old daughter, Isabela Herrera, who is an American citizen, donated $3.5 million to a super PAC tied to Mr. Trump. But as of last fall, the pardon remained elusive.
Then the Herrera family hired Alina Habba, who had been one of Mr. Trump’s personal lawyers and at the time was an adviser at the Justice Department. They offered her $10 million a year for four years along with a range of bonuses. In total, including bonuses, she was guaranteed more than $50 million over four years, according to interviews and documents obtained by The New York Times.
Under the agreement, Ms. Habba would become general counsel at Concord Partners, a company that Ms. Herrera set up in late October 2025 in Florida. The company has no public profile and its business remains unclear even to some people associated with the Herrera business empire. Ms. Habba finalized her deal days after the company was registered, while she was still serving as U.S. attorney in New Jersey.
She formally began her work for Concord Partners on Jan. 1. Weeks later, Mr. Trump granted Mr. Herrera a full and unconditional pardon.
“The culture of overcharging within the defense industry that has driven this
behavior has come with significant costs to both readiness and the American taxpayer.”
Washington, D.C. — U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.), and Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) sent a bipartisan letter to Deputy Secretary of Defense Stephen Feinberg requesting the Department to hold defense contractors accountable and enforce the Pentagon’s August 18 directive on Supplier Cost and Pricing Transparency.
For decades, defense contractors have taken advantage of the Pentagon’s inability to prevent price gouging. The Department notoriously paid $436 for hammers and $640 for toilet seats in the 1980s. More recently, Boeing charged the Air Force a nearly 8,000% markup on lavatory soap dispensers.
“The culture of overcharging within the defense industry that has driven this behavior has come with significant costs to both readiness and the American taxpayer,” wrote the senators.
In August 2026, the Department issued a new directive on “Supplier Cost and Pricing Transparency” to improve access to contractors’ cost and pricing data and help the Pentagon’s contracting officers negotiate fair prices. The senators welcomed the effort but raised concerns that a key gap in the policy – applying a $10 million threshold for obtaining certified cost and pricing data – could leave the Department without access to critical information for more than 60 percent of its contracts. They urged the Pentagon to apply its new directive to lower-value contracts and use its existing authority to make contractors ineligible for awards when they refuse to provide requested data.
They also urged the Department to support Senator Warren’s bipartisan Stop Price Gouging in the Military Act as well as their Transparency in Contract Pricing Act in the Fiscal Year 2027 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). Both bills would better arm contracting officers with statutory backing during negotiations, improve pricing transparency, and ensure taxpayers get a fair deal.
“To ensure our understanding of how this directive ‘resets the Department’s expectations regarding supplier cost and pricing information,’ and how it will gain transparency through ‘modern information technology and current business best practices,’ we seek to clarify how the Department will gain such data from refusing companies, conduct consistent oversight, and hold non-compliant companies accountable,” concluded the senators.
The senators requested answers to their questions by November 3, 2026, to inform legislation aimed at strengthening pricing transparency, preventing contractor abuse, and protecting taxpayer dollars.
Senator Warren has long led bipartisan efforts to crack down on defense contractor price gouging and protect taxpayers:
- In July 2026, she pressed Deputy Defense Secretary Feinberg on conflicts of interest related to companies bidding on the major Golden Dome missile defense program.
- In June 2026, she further pressed DoD on the potential conflicts of interest surrounding lucrative DoD loans and deals following reporting that the White House allegedly intervened to secure an OSC loan to a Trump Jr. company.
- In March 2026, after DoD failed to answer most questions in her January letter, she pressed DoD and OSC on the processes in place to ensure DoD contracts and loans are awarded fairly to companies.
- In January 2026, she raised concerns about DoD and OSC handing out loans and contracts to companies with ties to the Trump family.
- In September 2025, she introduced the Transparency in Contract Pricing Act of 2025 to root out price gouging by military contractors.
- In March 2025, Senator Warren (D-Mass.) wrote to Deputy Defense Secretary Nominee Stephen Feinberg, urging him to recuse himself from all matters related to Ligado Networks. Mr. Feinberg’s private equity firm, Cerberus Capital Management, is heavily invested in Ligado, which has a pending $39 billion lawsuit against the Department of Defense (DoD) over highly sought-after telecommunications spectrum space that the military has said is “essential for its various satellite communications, radars and navigation systems” usage.
- In September 2023, she called for further transparency surrounding DoD’s OSC and how it is interpreting ethics restrictions.
- In June 2023, she reintroduced the Stop Price Gouging the Military Actto address widespread price gouging in the military.
- In June 2023, she reintroduced the Department of Defense Ethics and Anti-Corruption Act to strengthen ethics laws in DoD contracts.
- On May 25, 2023, Senators Warren, Sanders, Braun, and Grassley sent a letter to DoD urging an investigation into contractor price gouging.
- On May 25, 2023, Senator Warren and Representative John Garamendi sent letters to DoD, Boeing, and TransDigm on companies’ refusal to provide cost or pricing data.
###