Thursday, November 12, 2026

The Snapshot

Thursday, November 12, 2026.  Chump and his allies attempt to bully Congress with threats of prosecution for exercising the powers the Constitution grants Congress, Priss Pot Pete Hegseth disgraces himself in front of THE TOMB OF THE UNKNOWN SOLDIER, AG Toad Blanche gets smacked around by a judge over Blanche's inability to follow the law, and much more. 




Chump and his administration are attempting to bully the newly elected incoming Democratic majorities in the House and the Senate.  Ana Ceballos (LOS ANGELES TIMES) reports: 

The White House’s top lawyer is raising the possibility of criminal investigations into House Democrats, arguing that the inquiries they plan to open into President Trump and administration officials could themselves break the law.
Will Scharf, the White House counsel, made the warning in a letter dated Monday to Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Long Beach), who is in line to lead the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, when Democrats take control of the chamber in January.
“We are monitoring the abusive and capricious threats that are now proliferating from Democrat legislators who seek to abuse the legislative process to intimidate and to interfere with the lawful functioning of government,” Scharf wrote.

Monitor whatever you want, you freak, THE CONSTITUTION is the supreme law of the land and you're not only attempting to bypass it, you're also making legal threats in an attempt to intimidate.  If the Justice Dept had a real Attorney General -- and not fat boy Toad Blanche -- you might be facing a sit-down-and-come-to-Jesus moment.  Yesterday, the Democrats on the House Oversight Committee issued the following statement:

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Today, Rep. Robert Garcia, Ranking Member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, released the following statement after the White House sent a letter to Oversight Democrats threatening to infringe upon the Committee’s constitutionally protected right to conduct congressional oversight.
"It appears Donald Trump has something to hide. Let's be clear: Congress' authority comes from Article I of the Constitution, not from the permission of the White House. Congress has wide latitude to conduct investigations and oversight, an authority inherent in the power to legislate.
The American people voted overwhelmingly for us to pass laws to root out corruption and abuse. The Trump Administration continues to weaponize the government with threats of unconstitutional attacks on Congress. We are a co-equal branch of government and will not be deterred by baseless threats from a weaponized DOJ or from the President’s lawyers," said Ranking Member Robert Garcia.
###

As Mike noted last night the administration is staffed with bullies and you have to stand up to bullies. 







Some legal experts also criticized Scharf's letter Wednesday, with Deborah Pearlstein, director of Princeton University's Program in Law and Public Policy, describing it on Bluesky as "a particularly ham-fisted stab at intimidation" that's "worth the paper it's written on, not more."


Erik De La Garza (RAW STORY) notes legal expert Elie Honig's take: 

CNN senior legal analyst Elie Honig delivered a blistering assessment Wednesday of the Trump administration’s attempts to portray congressional investigations by Democrats as potential criminal activity, calling the legal arguments advanced by two top administration lawyers "quite embarrassing."
"No, this is not a thing. No, this is not a crime. No, this is not anything even remotely close to a crime," Honig told CNN’s Brianna Keilar.
[. . .]
Honig said Democrats have discussed aggressively wielding subpoena powers after last week’s election victory, including promises to "throw subpoenas out like Mardi Gras beads."
But he flatly rejected suggestions that such rhetoric constitutes criminal threats or extortion.
“Not even close,” Honig said Wednesday. “All of this is core First Amendment protected political speech.” The CNN legal analyst and former federal prosecutor then took his criticism of the Trump administration a step further.
"It's actually quite embarrassing that experienced attorneys like Will Scharf and Todd Blanche are trying to say this is a crime," he added. "They have to know that it's not. This has to just be political posturing."


Accountability is long overdue.  Erin Banco and Jonathan Landay (REUTERS) report: 

Democrats in the US House of Representatives, who will control key committees next year, are preparing investigations into what they say was President Donald Trump’s politicization and gutting of US spy agencies, including whether analysts have censored themselves to avoid retaliation.
“There's absolutely evidence that analysts are hesitant to write on topics that they think might be controversial. There's absolutely evidence of a decline in morale in the analytic community because of the pressures that they are under,” US Representative Jim Himes, a Connecticut Democrat who will become chairman of the House intelligence committee in January, told Reuters on Tuesday.
There has been little scrutiny of the state of the US intelligence community by the Republican-run Congress during the first two years of Trump’s second term, during which the administration fired or forced out hundreds of officers and disrupted the production of analyses on key issues, including Iran.

That investigation might require testimony from former Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard who was last seen fleeing the administration right before it was revealed that as a member of Congress her controller was Guru Chris the head of her cult who regularly instructed her on how to vote and what to say publicly.  Banco and Landay note, "Former Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard last year cut her agency’s staff by about 40%."  


There is so much accountability that has been missing for the last two years.  Finya Swai (THE HILL) notes the journalist organization Reporters Without Borders:

Reporters Without Borders (RSF) is urging the incoming Congress to impeach Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chair Brendan Carr, accusing him of undermining press freedom by punishing news outlets critical of President Trump and his administration.
The organization, which advocates for journalists worldwide, claimed Carr has repeatedly used the FCC’s regulatory authority to pursue politically motivated investigations and influence media mergers in ways that benefit Trump and his allies.
“Few individuals have been more instrumental to the White House’s campaign to weaken the First Amendment than Brendan Carr,” Clayton Weimers, the executive director of RSF North America, said in a statement.
This is the first time RSF has called for the removal of a U.S. official, a step the group said was warranted by what it described as Carr’s persistent abuse of power. The group cited several of Carr’s high-profile clashes with major broadcasters, including ABC, as examples of the FCC’s alleged use of regulatory threats to influence news coverage.

And two US senators have grave concerns about gifts to the Secretary of Health and Human Services.  Zachary Leeman (MEDIAITE) explains: 

Senate Democrats have launched a new probe into Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the lavish gifts he’s received from a donor, The Wall Street Journal reported.
Kennedy received a number of gifts from donor Gavin de Becker in 2025, including use of his yacht in a summer “funded” by de Becker, according to people familiar with the matter. Sailing around Greece in a donor’s yacht was a previously unreported gift. Democrats are currently probing $250,000 in gifts Kennedy reportedly received, which include about $45,000 in airfare and use of a Washington, D.C. home.
The yacht trip in Greece was not included in previous financial disclosures.
“It seems abundantly clear that Mr. de Becker is a prohibited source and that you are not permitted to accept gifts from him while you serve as Secretary,” Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Sen. Angela Alsobrooks (D-MD) wrote to Kennedy in a letter. “Even if you consider him a friend, your relationship is not purely personal.”

And along with gifts, he needs to be investigated for his actions.  Isabel van Brugen (DAILY BEAST) notes:

The U.S. could soon lose its official designation as a nation that has eliminated measles as outbreaks intensify under President Donald Trump’s health secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Eight independent public health experts are meeting in Washington, D.C., this week to assess whether the country has experienced at least a year of uninterrupted measles transmission, the threshold for losing its elimination status.
The review comes as the U.S. faces its worst year for measles since 1991, raising scrutiny of Kennedy’s leadership and his efforts to reshape federal vaccine policy. Eight people have died from measles in the U.S. since the beginning of 2026, among them six in Pennsylvania, one in New York, and one in Wisconsin.
The panel advises the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), the World Health Organization’s regional office. Its recommendations will inform a final decision by the PAHO director.
The U.S. achieved measles elimination in 2000 following decades of vaccination efforts. International travel and growing vaccine hesitancy are thought to be behind its resurgence.
Kennedy, who leads the administration’s Make America Healthy Again initiative, has repeatedly cast doubt on vaccine safety. Since taking office last January, he has continued to promote misleading claims, including that the measles vaccine contains “aborted fetus debris.”


Meanwhile, Cross-Eyed Victoria Foxx looks closer and closer to losing the seat in Congress that has contained her bigoted butt for 11 terms. Luciana Perez Uribe Guinassi, Esther Frances and  Ronni Butts (THE STATE) reports: 

Republican U.S. Rep. Virginia Foxx narrowly trails her Democratic challenger after county election boards reviewed and counted more ballots in North Carolina.
The lead flipped back and forth Tuesday, as counties posted provisional ballot counts, but Chuck Hubbard’s lead ultimately stretched to 335 votes, extending his 99-vote lead from election night.
That 0.12% difference is well within the 1% margin for Foxx to request a recount. The candidates could also file formal challenges if they believe the vote count includes ineligible voters.



A Democrat is close to flipping a staunchly red district in North Carolina after he decided to run for office to fight for the rights of his LGBTQ+ daughter.
With more than 95% of votes counted, Chuck Hubbard currently leads 11-term anti-LGBTQ+ incumbent Virginia Foxx (R) by 325 votes in North Carolina’s Fifth Congressional District. According to NBC News, Foxx would need to win 64.3% of the remaining vote to catch up to Hubbard. S he beat Hubbard by 19 points in 2024.
A moving video of Hubbard at a town hall shows him explaining why LGBTQ+ issues are among the closest to his heart.
“The day Trump was elected the first time,” he said, “My daughter, Meredith, called me… crying and said, ‘Dad, every bit of progress we ever made is gonna be taken away from us. These people hate me… and they’re coming after me.'”
“That’s about as important as it gets,” he continued. “So I will do whatever, whenever, however I can to protect the LGBTQ community and make sure that they’re not bullied. Everybody deserves to be able to live their lives the way they want. You don’t get to tell me who to love. You don’t get to tell me how to dress, who to associate with, how to speak. These are core issues in the United States and the LGBTQ community. With MAGA folks in control, believe me, they are under threat.”


Cross-eyed Virginia may be out of Congress.  And we can all be thankful for that. 


A Democrat in the House who needs calling out?  Pete Aguilar.  Arthur Delaney (HUFFINGTON POST) reports that Aguilar is insisting that the 11 missing Democrats Tuesday when the vote to impeach Priss Pot Pete Hegseth would not have mattered had they been there:

“It’s disappointing, but even if we were at full attendance, it wouldn’t have changed the result,” the House Democratic Caucus chairman told HuffPost on Wednesday. 
The House approved a procedural motion to kill the impeachment resolution by referring it to a committee by a vote of 211 to 204, with 11 Democrats and seven Republicans missing the vote.
If the 11 Democrats had showed up, they could have given Democrats enough votes to defeat the resolution. But in that scenario, Aguilar said, Republicans would simply have held the vote upon until their absent members could be rounded up. 
“If everybody showed up on both sides, it still wouldn’t have impacted it. If only the Democrats showed up, Republicans would have held it open for a while,” Aguilar said. 

If everybody showed up on both sides?  I'm not worried about the Republicans.  I want to see the Democrats deliver.  And they didn't on Tuesday and there's no excuse for 11 of them missing the vote.  Had they shown up, they would have voted.  But they didn't show up.  And that reflects poorly on the Democrats and it reflects especially poorly on Hakeem Jeffries who wants to be the next Speaker of the House but who couldn't even get all the Dems to show up for the vote.  And he also didn't stall to buy the Dems time to get there.  But even Aguilar states that if the Dems has arrived the "Republicans would simply have held the vote until their absent members could be rounded up."  I don't doubt him that the GOP might have tried to hold it up.  But, again, that's what Hakeem should have been doing -- holding up the vote until the 11 Dems arrived. He didn't do that either.

We went from last week when voters delivered for the Democratic Party and gave them control of both houses and woo-hoo let's celebrate to the first vote that matters and the Dems lose because 11 of them didn't show up to vote.  That is not a good look and Aguilar looks like an idiot trying to mealy mouth it when he should be calling it out.  

Again, the American people have put their trust in the Democratic Party.  Before the new members are even sworn in, the party is already a disappointment. This cannot continue.





Democrats, fresh off their sweeping victories in last week’s elections, faced bitter criticism and recriminations on Wednesday from within their own ranks after 11 of their members missed a vote on the impeachment of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

The absences, which boosted Republicans’ successful effort to block the impeachment on Tuesday, cast a shadow over what was otherwise a triumphant week for Democrats that was supposed to be focused on savoring their electoral wins, welcoming new members and plotting out their agenda for when they take the helm of both chambers of Congress.

Instead, Representative Katherine Clark of Massachusetts, the No. 2 Democrat in charge of tracking votes among her members, began a closed-door party meeting on Wednesday morning scolding lawmakers who had been absent for the impeachment vote, as others chastised their colleagues in public.

“Show up and do your job,” Senator-elect Abdul El-Sayed, Democrat of Michigan, said bluntly on CNN Tuesday evening.

Representative Sydney Kamlager-Dove, Democrat of California, appeared to be seething as she left the Capitol following the vote Tuesday night, telling the MeidasTouch Network that Democrats had squandered the opportunity to push the impeachment charges forward over Republican opposition. “People should have gotten their raggedy selves up these steps to vote,” she said.


As shameful and embarrassing as that vote was for House Democrats, Priss Pot Pete brought more shame on the office of Sectary of Defense yesterday.









In commemoration of Veterans Day today, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth visited the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier at Arlington National Cemetery in Virginia, a monument that honors unidentified American service members who died in war.

Video captured Hegseth’s group of five people laughing near the monument. In response, one of the elite soldiers — tasked with helping maintain decorum at the monument literally 24 hours a day, 365 days a year — then turned and yelled to Hegseth’s group, “All visitors will maintain an atmosphere of silence and respect at all times!” The video clip of the interaction was broadcast nationwide by CNN.



Turning to Chump's old roll dog Jeffrey Epstein, the dead sex trafficker and pedophile remains in the news.  Caitlin Yilek (CBS NEWS) reports: 

Republican Rep. Thomas Massie has secured enough support to force a vote on legislation that would compel the release of the remaining Justice Department files related to Jeffrey Epstein. 
Massie launched a discharge petition over the summer to circumvent leadership and force a vote on the bill, known as the Epstein Files Transparency Act II. 
In order to bring the legislation to the floor, the discharge petition needs 218 signatures. It hit that threshold Wednesday. Four Republicans, including Massie, and all Democrats have added their names. The other Republicans who signed on are Reps. Brian Fitzgerald of Pennsylvania, Nancy Mace and Ralph Norman, both of South Carolina. 

Why do we need this?  Didn't The Epstein Transparency Act that passed both houses of Congress and was even signed by Chump call for all documents to be released?  Yes, it did.  But AG Toad Blanche doesn't follow the law.  He does what he wants and breaks the law.  He's withheld millions of pages.  So now Congress is going to attempt a new act of Congress to force him to follow the law.    

This as a judge is also attempting to do the same.  Brett Meiselas (MEIDASTOUCH NEWS) notes:

A federal judge has ordered Attorney General Todd Blanche to release previously unpublished handwritten FBI interview notes involving allegations of sexual abuse against Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, delivering one of three significant rulings in MeidasTouch host Katie Phang’s lawsuit over the Trump administration’s handling of the Epstein files.
Senior U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan issued three orders on November 9, rejecting the Justice Department’s attempt to delay producing records explaining its Epstein-files decisions, requiring a sworn accounting of foreign-language documents, and directing the publication of FBI notes that the department has withheld from public view.
The rulings represent another significant development in Phang’s legal effort to force the Justice Department to comply with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which required the attorney general to make covered unclassified Justice Department records public within 30 days of its November 19, 2025 enactment.
Nearly 11 months later, the department is still fighting over records that Phang argues should have been released long ago.








Let's wind down with this from Senator Elizabeth Warren:

Video of Remarks (YouTube)

Washington, D.C. — At the 2026 Popular Mandate conference, U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) urged Democrats to deliver on the populist economic policies that led them to an historic victory in the 2026 midterm election last week.

“Democrats won – and won big – by recognizing Americans’ economic pain, denouncing Washington corruption that has made a rigged economy worse, and pledging to upend this system,” said Senator Warren. “That is a powerfully important lesson going into this next Congress and the next presidential primary in 2028.”

Senator Warren pointed to the evidence that populism won across the country, including Senators-elect James Talarico, Sherrod Brown, Adam Hamilton, Abdul El-Sayed, Troy Jackson, Peggy Flanagan, and Julianna Stratton.

  • In Texas, James Talarico said bluntly that “the system is rigged” and pledged support for Senator Warren’s bipartisan bill with Republican Senator Josh Hawley to break up big medicine.
  • In Ohio, Sherrod Brown channeled voter fury against AI data centers and said, “A handful of corrupt billionaires think they can buy power and keep this rigged system working in their favor… We’re proving that our voice is louder than their money.”
  • In Kansas, Adam Hamilton won by calling for cracking down on corporate price gouging, stopping data centers from jacking up utility bills, and expanding Medicare.
  • In North Carolina, Roy Cooper rolled out an ad in the final weeks saying he would, “fight the insurance companies and take on the utility monopolies.”
  • In Iowa, Josh Turek put forward a serious plan to scrap the cap to tax the richest Americans so we can extend Social Security.
  • In Michigan, Abdul El-Sayed defended one of the most vulnerable Senate seats on the map with a full-on embrace of Medicare for All, a wealth tax for billionaires, and universal child care.

Senator Warren also laid out the task ahead, saying, “There are two massive barriers for Democrats to enact the change people want: First, the Senate filibuster. And second, Trump’s potential veto. But here’s the good news: we have tools to get where we need to be.”

She pointed to several ways Congress can make inroads now, including:

  • Working with President Trump and Republicans if they’re willing to deliver for families;
  • Pushing policies through reconciliation and spending bills “to pass big chunks of legislation that would improve people’s lives without a single Republican vote;”
  • Challenging Trump and Republicans to oppose popular legislation to crack down on Trump’s corruption;
  • And “hold(ing) Donald Trump and his cronies accountable for ripping off the American people.”

“Democrats are determined to make this economy and this government work for hard working people, and we have a plan for that: Part One: win the midterms. Part Two: Deliver big change. The time for Democrats to fight hard and produce results is now,” Senator Warren concluded in the speech.

Transcript: Senator Warren’s Speech at Popular Mandate Conference
November 10, 2026
As Prepared for Delivery 
Senator Elizabeth Warren: 

Intro

Thank you, Lindsay! It’s great to be with so many friends here at Popular Mandate!

One week after the 2026 midterms, the results are clear: Democrats won by fighting for populist economic policies.

In the most competitive 2026 races, in blue, purple, and red states, including places like Texas, Kansas, and South Carolina, Democrats won – and won big – by recognizing Americans’ economic pain, denouncing Washington corruption that has made a rigged economy worse, and pledging to upend this system.

That is a powerfully important lesson going into this next Congress and the next presidential primary in 2028. 

Recall how Donald Trump swept back into power in the first place. Sure, I get it, lots of dog whistles and ugly stuff, but that wasn’t all. Trump promised he would lower costs “on Day 1.” Every day, over and over again,Trump got out and bragged that he would quote “end inflation and make America affordable again.” In his first major interview after the election, Trump said, “I won on groceries. Very simple word, groceries.” 

Of course, Trump’s promises were empty. Instead of helping working people, Trump and Congressional Republicans took a wrecking ball to our economy, saying yes, yes, yes to every disastrous plan that he put in place. 

  • Cutting health care to finance tax breaks for rich people and giant corporations. 
  • Imposing chaotic and illegal tariffs. 
  • Launching a forever war. 

Every one of those actions increased the cost of nearly everything for American families. 

While he has been breaking the economy for regular people, Trump and his buddies have run the most corrupt administration in modern US history. Trump has turned the federal government into a corruption machine designed to rake in profits for himself, his family, and his cronies—and make everyone else pay the bill. 

Gas prices over $5 a gallon. Ground beef prices spiking to more than $7 a pound. Inflation surging from the one-two-punch of Trump’s trade wars and Iran war. Mortgage rates above 7 percent. Credit card interest and car loans squeezing families hard. 

But not everyone has felt the pressure. Corporate profits have skyrocketed to record levels while the share of income going to workers crashed to an all-time low. 

Given the economic disaster that Trump unleashed, many DC pundits want to chalk up this election to nothing more than a referendum on the Republican Party, because of Trump’s failures on inflation and Iran. And yes, this is surely part of the story. 

But those failures have a name – affordability. When the President said high prices mattered to him, he won. When he drove up prices and enriched himself instead of addressing those high costs, he lost. 

In the wake of these historic wins, now is the time to listen to voters. It’s time to be clear-eyed about what voters heard – and liked – from winning candidates. 

Populism Wins – Evidence 

I’m going to focus on the Senate races, because that’s where I’ve put a lot of my efforts over the past two years – and where Democrats performed better than anyone thought was possible. 

First, all kinds of Democrats who won were straightforward about the fact that the economy is rigged against working people. And they didn’t pull punches about whose fault that is. 

Take James Talarico, the first Democratic senator from Texas in thirty years. Week after week on the trail, Talarico said bluntly that “the system is rigged.” In the final stretch of his campaign, he called out Elon Musk for trying to buy a Senate seat. Talarico won by over 10 points – in Texas. The future governor of Texas, Gina Hinojosa, made a similar argument. She said, quote “The one fight in this country is about economic power.” 

In Ohio, my friend Sherrod Brown channeled voter fury against AI data centers. And when crypto bros and Big Tech billionaires tried to buy this Senate seat for the Republicans, Sherrod didn’t mince words. He said, “A handful of corrupt billionaires think they can buy power and keep this rigged system working in their favor, ”We’re proving that our voice is louder than their money.” And Sherrod was right. 

In Kansas, yes, Kansas, Adam Hamilton won by calling for cracking down on corporate price gouging, stopping data centers from jacking up utility bills, and expanding Medicare. And by the way, speaking of Kansas, Dr. Roger Marshall lost because voters rejected him nickeling and diming his struggling patients. It was a stark contrast that made clear which candidate would fight for you. 

Every winner made these arguments and made them loudly – Abdul El-Sayed, Troy Jackson, Peggy Flanagan, Juliana Stratton – the list goes on and on. Many of them did so in their primaries as well, beating DC establishment candidates who were just too damn timid to call out the rich and powerful. 

Now, you might be thinking that the rhetoric was fiery, but that doesn’t mean this is actually a different breed of Democrats headed to Washington. And in fact, there are some self-titled “strategists” in our party who are happy to have Democrats rail against billionaires at their rallies – but they expect softer, more middle-of-the-road, corporate-friendly economic policies once in office. According to this logic, it’s fine to call yourself a populist if it helps you win in the general election, but don’t rock the boat so much that you tip your wealthy donors or rich CEO buddies into the water. 

If we want a clue as to what these voters actually want from Congress, just look at what the winners actually promised to do. 

For the first time in over a decade, North Carolina will have a Democratic Senator. Roy Cooper’s campaign slogan was “Make Stuff Cost Less.” His ad in the final weeks said he would  “fight the insurance companies and take on the utility monopolies.” And Roy isn’t playing a part. He is a seasoned former attorney general, and his campaign plan to lower grocery prices called for blocking anti-competitive mergers and stopping companies from using algorithms to fix prices for food—pretty specific plans to favor customers over corporations. 

Also, for the first time in 18 years, Iowa will have a Democratic Senator: self-described prairie populist Josh Turek. Josh believes that (quote) “health care is a human right.” He proudly calls himself a moderate Democrat. And he is. But this moderate Democrat made clear he’s ready to fight the powerful on behalf of the people of Iowa. He’s ready to fight the monopolies that own your health insurance, your pharmacy, and your PBM. He’s talked about breaking up Big Ag monopolies and the right to repair your own stuff. And with cuts to Social Security looming, he put forward a serious plan to scrap the cap to tax the richest Americans so we can extend Social Security in the future. Strong—and very specific. 

James Talarico pledged support for my bipartisan bill with Republican Senator Josh Hawley to break up big medicine. Mary Peltola promised to ban price gouging and called to (quote) “block anti-competitive mergers that let grocery chains … (that) drive up prices.” Abdul El-Sayed criss-crossed Michigan and defended one of the most vulnerable Senate seats on the map with a full-on embrace of Medicare for All, a wealth tax for billionaires, and universal child care. 

Populism Wins – Private Equity in Housing 

I want to spend a minute telling you about one of my very favorite issues out on the campaign trail this year, because it offers an insight into what’s going on. 

One of the biggest economic issues in these elections was housing. Last summer, Congress passed the biggest housing affordability legislation in 30 years. It’s a terrific bill with dozens of provisions designed to build more housing and lower costs. But here’s my favorite part: the new law also stops private equity and these Wall Street investors from buying up huge numbers of homes. The idea is simple: homes are for families, not corporations. As we got to the final passage of the Housing bill, there was a big fight inside the beltway to get that provision into the housing bill, and to keep it there. But in the real world, out on the campaign trail, in high school gymnasiums and parking lot rallies, the cheers for dumping private equity were long and loud. The private equity portion of the bill was the most remembered and most beloved. 

In the final stretch of the midterms, candidates have debates. And one common gotcha question is: you’re a Democrat, so what do you agree with Trump on? Two answers in two states were exactly the same. Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan and Josh Turek in Iowa both said they agree with Donald Trump that we should get private equity out of housing. Shazam! 

This issue of private equity in housing caught fire in competitive races, including many House races. In New Mexico, Gabe Vasquez pushed back against private equity buying up manufactured housing. In Florida, Darren Soto made sure the Orlando voter guide included his vote in support of stopping “hedge funds from buying up many single-family homes.” In Iowa, Christina Bohannan told the Des Moines Register that she will take on corporate price gouging, including “the private equity firms that are buying up Iowa properties.” 

But that’s not all. Adam Hamilton and Annie Andrews, two of the biggest underdog races in the county, both campaigned on going even further to rein in private equity. They looked at the bill we passed in the summer and said, “Hey, that’s pretty good, but we should do more.” And they are right. Congress should do more to stop Wall Street from buying up homes and private equity’s looting. 

The Task Ahead 

So yes, we won big by naming what is wrong and convincing voters that we would take on a rigged system in order to fix it. 

But here’s the thing. It would be a tremendous breach of faith with the people who voted for us to spend the next two years ahead of the 2028 election railing against Trump and waiting for a future Democratic trifecta to deliver meaningful change. 

Democrats must spend the next two years fighting to deliver for working people now. Yes, even with Donald Trump in the White House. 

There are two massive barriers for Democrats to enact the change people want: First, the Senate filibuster. And second, Trump’s potential veto. But here’s the good news: we have tools to get where we need to be. 

First, I’m ready to team up with any Republican who’s heard the American people loud and clear. 

  • If Trump is serious about lowering costs, then let’s take him up on his promise to cap credit card interest rates and save families hundreds of dollars. 
  • Trump says he supports cracking down on corporate healthcare middlemen – we’ve got a bipartisan bill to get it done. 
  • Protect Social Security from benefit cuts? I have a plan with Republican Senator Moreno to force billionaires to pay into Social Security at the same rate as a public school teacher, making the program solvent for a generation. 
  • And now is the time for Congress to expand on our bipartisan ROAD to Housing bill and pass additional legislation to build more homes. 

Ready to go, Mr. President. Tell your Congressional team, and we’ll get this done. 

But hear this: if Republicans won’t join us, Democrats will move ahead without them. 

The reconciliation process allows us to pass big chunks of legislation that would improve people’s lives without a single Republican vote. Reverse the health care cuts the Republicans put in place, expand health care coverage, and fund universal childcare – all with a 51-vote majority in the Senate. And, to pay for it, we can start by reversing the tax breaks Trump and the Republicans handed out to millionaires and billionaires – again with 51 votes. A Democratic majority in Congress can also send the president a resolution that revokes his authority to wage war in Iran – again with 51 votes. 

And let’s not forget one of our most powerful tools: Democrats have power on spending bills that require our votes, and we should use it. No more funding for a forever war with Iran. Cancel the looming cuts to health insurance and nutrition benefits put in place by Republicans last summer. 

Next, where Democrats agree reconciliation is not an option, like with bills to ban stock trading by federal officials or crack down on Trump’s corruption in plain sight, Democrats should put the bills up for a vote. Let the Republicans decide if they want to stay tied to such corruption and, if they do, then let’s clear away Senate filibuster rules and pass the laws anyway. 

Look, I get it. These bills could still face a veto from Donald Trump. But for me, that’s not enough reason not to try. Democrats must deliver popular, meaningful legislation to Trump’s desk and dare him to veto it. 

  • Dare him to veto an increase in the minimum wage for hard-working Americans. 
  • Dare him to veto a ban on price gouging. 
  • Dare him to veto a ban on AI surveillance pricing. 
  • Dare him to veto a ban on stock trading 
  • Dare him to veto legislation that gets money out of politics so no one can buy our democracy. 

You can’t win what you don’t fight for. And if we don’t fight – if we hang back and sand down the edges of our economic agenda or trim our ambitions because we’re worried about what rich donors or giant corporations might think – then shame on us. I have already heard some Democrats accept defeat before we even tried fighting for progress. That breaks faith with the people who sent us here. Change can’t wait. We must deliver now. 

Finally, accountability. Congress has the power to hold Donald Trump and his cronies accountable for ripping off the American people to make themselves richer. Under the Trump Administration, the corruption has been massive—beyond anything seen in American history. 

Accountability is coming. If you’re a Wall Street executive, Big Tech CEOs, giant corporations that have been cheating people, you should be worried. And government officials who have put their own interests ahead of the public interest, should be worried too.

Democrats are determined to make this economy and this government work for hard-working people, and we have a plan for that: Part One: win the midterms. Part Two: Deliver big change. The time for Democrats to fight hard and produce results is now. 

###




The following sites updated: