A year after a sweeping government reorganization began, the agencies charged with protecting the United States against terrorist attacks remain troubled by high-level turnover, overlapping responsibilities and bureaucratic rivalry, former and current officials say.
Progress has been made, most of the officials say, toward one critical goal: the sharing of terrorist threat information from all agencies at the National Counterterrorism Center. But many argue that the biggest restructuring of spy agencies in half a century has bloated the bureaucracy, adding boxes to the government organization chart without producing clearly defined roles.
The above is from Scott Shane's "Year Into Revamped Spying, Troubles and Some Progress" in this morning's New York Times which treats the whole thing as nothing more than an intramural playoff. Insiders then and now plus Susan Collins (Republican) and a kook from the Heritage Foundation get to weigh in. (No, no Democratic Senator weighs in and no equivalent from the center or left to Heritage is to be found in the article -- the Times calls this "balance.")
There's an NSA hearing today, though you might not know it from reading this morning's paper.
Lloyd notes Ruth Conniff's "Fat Tuesday for Disaster Profiteers" (Ruth Conniff's Online Column, The Progressive):
As a depleted population struggled to celebrate Mardi Gras in New Orleans, new reports emerged about corporate cronyism and disaster profiteering under the Bush Administration.
"Six months after Hurricane Katrina battered the Gulf Coast, government contracts have gone to politically connected corporations with track records of fraud and violations of worker rights," says a report by the Gulf Coast Commission on Reconstruction Equity.
"The Gulf Coast has been besieged by large corporate profiteers, while many workers don't even receive their wages," said the Reverend Nelson Johnson, president of Interfaith Worker Justice.
At the same time Johnson’s group was calling its press conference on the damage done by cronyism in New Orleans, the New York Times reported that the Army has decided to pay Halliburton nearly all $2.41 billion in disputed costs on its controversial no-bid contract to rebuild Iraq. The Army is paying the bill "even though the Pentagon's own auditors had identified more than $250 million in charges as potentially excessive or unjustified," the Times reports.
The Bush Administration seems to be applying the same wasteful, crony-capitalist model in both Iraq and New Orleans.
Cindy notes Thom Hartman's "When Americans No Longer Own America" (Common Dreams):
The Dubai Ports World deal is waking Americans up to a painful reality: So-called "conservatives" and "flat world" globalists have bankrupted our nation for their own bag of silver, and in the process are selling off America.
Through a combination of the "Fast Track" authority pushed for by Reagan and GHW Bush, sweetheart trade deals involving "most favored nation status" for dictatorships like China, and Clinton pushing us into NAFTA and the WTO (via GATT), we've abandoned the principles of tariff-based trade that built American industry and kept us strong for over 200 years.
The old concept was that if there was a dollar's worth of labor in a pair of shoes made in the USA, and somebody wanted to import shoes from China where there may only be ten cents worth of labor in those shoes, we'd level the playing field for labor by putting a 90-cent import tariff on each pair of shoes. Companies could choose to make their products here or overseas, but the ultimate cost of labor would be the same.
Then came the flat-worlders, led by misguided true believers and promoted by multinational corporations. Do away with those tariffs, they said, because they "restrain trade." Let everything in, and tax nothing. The result has been an explosion of cheap goods coming into our nation, and the loss of millions of good manufacturing jobs and thousands of manufacturing companies. Entire industry sectors have been wiped out.
There's already an e-mail (on the previous entry) stating that the Times does cover the port issue raised in the Washington Post (Jonathan Weisman's article, see previous entry). No, it doesn't. It does intramural in Carl Hulse and David E. Sanger's article. Once again, they're focused on official reactions -- what will Frist do! They don't explore the issue and they don't even summarize it well. They do round up a lot of adminstration people and a lot of Republicans. (Hillary Clinton, senator from New York, in case the Times forgot, held a press conference. They get to that in the fourth to last paragraph of the long article.) There are issues to be covered, issues that matter. The paper of record is too busy being a stenographer to the powerful to cover the issue.
Read the two articles. Read the Times first and see what you walk away with. (I'm guessing the official talking points from officials -- mainly Republicans.) Read the Post. You'll have an understanding of what the Coast Guard found -- not what officials say was found or what they feel about what was found or . . . That's not to suggest that the Post is the voice of the people. We don't have a major daily that is. That is to say that on this story, the Post is covering it and the Times is falling back to its usual routine of reducing an issue (sidelining it) and instead focusing on official-speak. If a national problem occurs and no official speaks, does it make a sound? Not in the paper of record. (Also, in answer to the question in the e-mail about this, I didn't find those articles from the Post, Martha noted both of them -- and is credited for that.)
I noted in the previous entry:
News that deserves to be treated as such and covered as such. (I'm not seeing either issue getting an article devoted to it in this morning's New York Times -- though I haven't read the briefs -- national or international. The Times' ports "coverage" appears more interested in a poll -- big surprise.)
It does. You get the officials talking points from Hulse and Sanger and you get a poll summary from Elisabeth Bumiller and a new trainee in the Elite Fluff Patrol squad. The issues the Coast Guard's 'released papers' were actually concerned with aren't addressed. How official spokesperson (Republicans for the majority of the article) want to spin them gets huge play. Reality? The paper's not so concerned with that.
As noted last night:
Remember that the Senate holds another NSA warrentless, illegal spying hearing. Want to listen? Tuesday Pacifica will air the NSA hearings, gavel to gavel, live.
Be sure to listen if you're able. And if you listen to Democracy Now! but it doesn't air on on the usual radio station you listen to as a result of the above, remember that you can hear, watch or read transcripts at the website.
The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.
the new york times
scott shane
carl hulse
david e. sanger
the washington post
ruth conniff
thom hartman
jonathan weisman
nsa
fisa
government snooping
government spying
snoopgate
pacifica
pacifica radio
Tuesday, February 28, 2006
"U.S. Is Settling Detainee's Suit in 9/11 Sweep" (Nina Bernstein)
The federal government has agreed to pay $300,000 to settle a lawsuit brought by an Egyptian who was among dozens of Muslim men swept up in the New York area after 9/11, held for months in a federal detention center in Brooklyn and deported after being cleared of links to terrorism.
[. . .]
In all, 762 noncitizens were arrested in the weeks after 9/11, mostly on immigration violations, according to government records. Mr. Elmaghraby and Mr. Iqbal were among 184 identified as being "of high interest" to investigators and held in maximum-security conditions, in Brooklyn and elsewhere, until the F.B.I. cleared them of terrorist links. Virtually all were Muslims or from Arab countries.
The above is from Nina Bernstein's "U.S. Is Settling Detainee's Suit in 9/11 Sweep" in this morning's New York Times. Settling? Of course they're settling. They don't want John Ashcroft, among others, on the witness stand being cross examined while under oath.
These were the roundups that no one wanted to see. Muslim men targeted for being Muslim. If all viewers of Monday Night Football had been instructed by the government to 'come forward' and speak to the government, people would have been outraged. Instead, most people refused to say a word or act like anything was happening when Muslim males were targeted with similar requests. If you've forgotten (or ignored) that recent time period, you may not be aware that one of the few groups resisting the US government's efforts to target Muslims were local police departments who saw the administration's efforts as not helpful, harming community outreach efforts the departments had in place and offering nothing solid to work with.
They weren't the only groups resisting. But when any state or local group offers resistance to the administration today, it's still treated as news -- relatively few press outlets found the local police departments resistance's news worthy of large coverage at the time.
For instance, Martha notes Jonathan Weisman's "Coast Guard Saw 'Intelligence Gaps' on Ports" (Washington Post) which is news and deserves attention (the kind that the police departments complaints and resistance deserved but didn't get). From the article:
The U.S. Coast Guard, in charge of reviewing security at ports operated by a Dubai maritime company, warned the Bush administration it could not rule out that the company's assets could be used for terrorist operations, according to a document released yesterday by a Senate committee.
State-owned Dubai Ports World plans to complete its takeover of London-based Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co. (P&O) on Thursday, assuming ownership of operations at six major U.S. ports even as it pledges to hold off on asserting control while the Bush administration reviews the national security implications of the deal. The White House has strongly argued that a preliminary review showed that the sale would pose no threat to national security.
But in a Dec. 13 intelligence assessment of the company and its owners in the United Arab Emirates, the Coast Guard warned: "There are many intelligence gaps, concerning the potential for DPW or P&O assets to support terrorist operations, that preclude" the completion of a thorough threat assessment of the merger.
Or take another item Martha notes, Christopher Lee's "Court Blocks DOD's New Rules for Workers: Collective Bargaining Hurt, Judge Says" (Washington Post):
A federal judge blocked the Defense Department from implementing much of its new personnel system yesterday, handing the Bush administration a major setback in its efforts to streamline work rules and install pay-for-performance systems in federal workplaces.
In a 77-page decision, U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that the Pentagon's National Security Personnel System (NSPS) fails to ensure collective bargaining rights, does not provide an independent third-party review of labor relations decisions and would leave employees without a fair process for appealing disciplinary actions.
News that deserves to be treated as such and covered as such. (I'm not seeing either issue getting an article devoted to it in this morning's New York Times -- though I haven't read the briefs -- national or international. The Times' ports "coverage" appears more interested in a poll -- big surprise.)
Don't forget, Senate hearings on the NSA air today on Pacifica radio.
Remember to listen, watch or read Democracy Now! today.
The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.
the new york times
nina bernstein
the washington post
jonathan weisman
christopher lee
[. . .]
In all, 762 noncitizens were arrested in the weeks after 9/11, mostly on immigration violations, according to government records. Mr. Elmaghraby and Mr. Iqbal were among 184 identified as being "of high interest" to investigators and held in maximum-security conditions, in Brooklyn and elsewhere, until the F.B.I. cleared them of terrorist links. Virtually all were Muslims or from Arab countries.
The above is from Nina Bernstein's "U.S. Is Settling Detainee's Suit in 9/11 Sweep" in this morning's New York Times. Settling? Of course they're settling. They don't want John Ashcroft, among others, on the witness stand being cross examined while under oath.
These were the roundups that no one wanted to see. Muslim men targeted for being Muslim. If all viewers of Monday Night Football had been instructed by the government to 'come forward' and speak to the government, people would have been outraged. Instead, most people refused to say a word or act like anything was happening when Muslim males were targeted with similar requests. If you've forgotten (or ignored) that recent time period, you may not be aware that one of the few groups resisting the US government's efforts to target Muslims were local police departments who saw the administration's efforts as not helpful, harming community outreach efforts the departments had in place and offering nothing solid to work with.
They weren't the only groups resisting. But when any state or local group offers resistance to the administration today, it's still treated as news -- relatively few press outlets found the local police departments resistance's news worthy of large coverage at the time.
For instance, Martha notes Jonathan Weisman's "Coast Guard Saw 'Intelligence Gaps' on Ports" (Washington Post) which is news and deserves attention (the kind that the police departments complaints and resistance deserved but didn't get). From the article:
The U.S. Coast Guard, in charge of reviewing security at ports operated by a Dubai maritime company, warned the Bush administration it could not rule out that the company's assets could be used for terrorist operations, according to a document released yesterday by a Senate committee.
State-owned Dubai Ports World plans to complete its takeover of London-based Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co. (P&O) on Thursday, assuming ownership of operations at six major U.S. ports even as it pledges to hold off on asserting control while the Bush administration reviews the national security implications of the deal. The White House has strongly argued that a preliminary review showed that the sale would pose no threat to national security.
But in a Dec. 13 intelligence assessment of the company and its owners in the United Arab Emirates, the Coast Guard warned: "There are many intelligence gaps, concerning the potential for DPW or P&O assets to support terrorist operations, that preclude" the completion of a thorough threat assessment of the merger.
Or take another item Martha notes, Christopher Lee's "Court Blocks DOD's New Rules for Workers: Collective Bargaining Hurt, Judge Says" (Washington Post):
A federal judge blocked the Defense Department from implementing much of its new personnel system yesterday, handing the Bush administration a major setback in its efforts to streamline work rules and install pay-for-performance systems in federal workplaces.
In a 77-page decision, U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that the Pentagon's National Security Personnel System (NSPS) fails to ensure collective bargaining rights, does not provide an independent third-party review of labor relations decisions and would leave employees without a fair process for appealing disciplinary actions.
News that deserves to be treated as such and covered as such. (I'm not seeing either issue getting an article devoted to it in this morning's New York Times -- though I haven't read the briefs -- national or international. The Times' ports "coverage" appears more interested in a poll -- big surprise.)
Don't forget, Senate hearings on the NSA air today on Pacifica radio.
Remember to listen, watch or read Democracy Now! today.
The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.
the new york times
nina bernstein
the washington post
jonathan weisman
christopher lee
Monday, February 27, 2006
Octavia Butler, NSA hearing on Pacifica Tuesday, Michael Ratner week
Science Fiction Writer Octavia Butler, 58, Dies
And science fiction writer Octavia Butler has died at the age of 58. She died on Friday night after a fall outside her home in Washington state. Her best-known work included "Parable of the Talents" and "Kindred." Butler was considered to be one of the first African-American women to break into the world of science fiction. Jane Jewell, of the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America, said "She is a world-class science fiction writer in her own right. She was one of the first and one of the best to discuss gender and race in science fiction." Butler joined us four months ago on Democracy Now:
OCTAVIA BUTLER: "I'm going to read a verse or two. And keep in mind these were written early in the 1990s. But I think they apply forever, actually. This first one, I have a character in the books who is, well, someone who is taking the country fascist and who manages to get elected President and, who oddly enough, comes from Texas. And here is one of the things that my character is inspired to write about, this sort of situation. She says:
"Choose your leaders with wisdom and forethought. To be led by a coward is to be controlled by all that the coward fears. To be led by a fool is to be led by the opportunists who control the fool. To be led by a thief is to offer up your most precious treasures to be stolen. To be led by a liar is to ask to be lied to. To be led by a tyrant is to sell yourself and those you love into slavery."
The above item is from today's Democracy Now! Headlines and my apologies to Ty. Octavia Butler is a favorite author of his and this should have been noted earlier today. I had intended for it be noted and in the e-mail attempts (to e-mail the post), it was; however, those never made it and I ended up dictating the entry over and forgetting the item.
I'm tired, so this is a talking entry.
Bruce wondered what online page I went to for the excerpt of Lewis Lapham's "The Case For Impeachment" that was in this entry? I didn't read it online. Chad e-mailed the heads up that a portion was available online. I dictated that from the print version of Harper's Magazine. On the essay (which is wonderful), Lily e-mails about another site calling Lapham's a first or something. I haven't seen the entry she's speaking of. Hopefully, they're not saying that. Elizabeth Holtzman's "The Impeachment of George W. Bush" advocated the impeachment of Bully Boy (and was also wonderful). Click here for the contents of that issue (available to all, subscriber or nonsubscribe) and you'll see the cover. The Nation made that the cover story of their January 30, 2006 issue. Again, I haven't read the entry (and don't have time to). But if someone was saying Lapham's article was a first for a magazine, it's not the first for the year. I'm sure there were other cover articles as well before Holtzman's.
Both are wonderful articles and approach the impeachment differently. Lewis is writing an essay in his own wonderful way and Holtzman is doing the same in her way. Robert Scheer was advocating it in 2003. (He wasn't the only one.) In terms of magazines making it a cover story, at least this year, The Nation did that awhile back. (I can't say how many issues ago because they always arrive late -- and usually in twos or threes -- I never did receive the Frances Lappe Moore issue. That's not a slam at The Nation. It's a mail issue, not a magazine one. I have The Progressive delivered to a friend's residence and, as a result, it arrives on time. The only magazine that does -- and again, not a slam at any magazine, it's a mail issue.)
I'm not trying to take anything away from Lapham. I'm not even sure Lapham was called the first. And it doesn't really matter if he was to this community. What does matter in this community is that we recognize that Lapham continues this year's tradition of cover articles calling on impeachment.
In terms of confusion, I'm not surprised Bruce's is confused. The entry that did make it to the site was rushed (hence forgetting Ty's highlight) and there's no sentence stating "This is from the magazine." My apologies for that. It's a strong issue and Stan's already e-mailed about an essay "Liberalism, Torture and The Ticking Bomb" by David Luhan. Stan wonders what the Judith N. Shklar quote is from? I'm surprised it isn't credited. I'm not sure, but I believe it's from the introduction to Ordinary Vices. I'll check on that later this week. I haven't read the entire essay yet. But the quote appears to be from Ordinary Vices.
Bruce found this announcement online at Harper's:
HARPER'S MAGAZINE
presents
Is There a Case for Impeachment?
a public forum featuring
Lewish H. Lapham
Rep. John J. Conyers (D-MI)
Michael Ratner
Elizabeth Holtzman
John Dean
Moderated by
Sam Seder
Thursday, March 2
8:00 p.m.
Town Hall
123 West 43rd Street
New York, NY
$10.00
Tickets are available at
The Town Hall box office
or through Ticketmaster
(212) 307-4100
www.ticketmaster.com
Press contact for this event: Giulia Melucci.
See, it really was Michael Ratner day. (See earlier entry.) Maybe it's Michael Ratner week?
Ruth noted this:
New Orleans 1973 to Guantánamo 2006
A discussion on torture at the hands of the United States government.
WHAT: New Yorkers Unite to Fight U.S. Torture from New Orleans to Abu Ghraib and Guantánamo
WHEN: March 3, 2006,
6:30 to 8:30 PM
WHERE: Riverside Church,
91 Claremont Ave.
Room 9T
(1 block west of Broadway)
WHO:
Gita Gutierrez, CCR attorney representing Guantànamo detainees
John Bowman and Harold Taylor, Black Panthers tortured by New Orleans Law Enforcement in 1973
Henry “Hank” Jones, CDHR
Wayne Thompson, CDHR
Dr. Ron Daniels, Institute of the Black World 21st Century
Michael Ratner, CCR President
Bill Goodman, CCR Legal Director
Staying on Michael Ratner but moving to the Center for Constitutional Rights, Jonah was at work and attempted to find a new book online at WBAI's pledge drive premiums. He couldn't find it. (Did you contribute anyway, Jonah? I'm just teasing.) He heard about it during the broadcast of Law and Disorder and went through "seven pages of premiums" looking and "used the search function too." The book is Articles of Impeachment Against George W. Bush and you can order it online. (Or you could have called WBAI, it's not even a toll call for you, Jonah.) If it wasn't on the seven pages of premiums, that's because, according to Ruth, it's brand new. This was the first day WBAI was offering it. Ruth says it's $9.99 plus shipping and that you can send it to Congress members of your choice at a discount rate. Don't want to order online? See if there's not an address you can send a check or money order too or ask your bookstore of choice to special order it for you. The book's put out by the Center for Constitutional Rights.
Remember that the Senate holds another NSA warrentless, illegal spying hearing. Want to listen? Tuesday Pacifica will air the NSA hearings, gavel to gavel, live. WBAI is still doing fundraising. I would guess that they would cover it but Rachel says they have nothing up about it currently.
NSA Surveillance Hearing Special Coverage Feb 28, 2006
SPECIAL LIVE COVERAGE:Pacifica Radio will broadcast: President Bush surveillance coverage of the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings on the National Security Agency activities.
The Senate Judiciary Committee holds its second hearing into President Bush's authorization of warrantless wiretaps within the United States of America. Breaks will include expert analysis and anchor commentary.
TENTATIVE SCHEDULE:
9:00-9:30 AM EST Pre-show
9:30 AM - 1:00 PM EST Hearings
1:00 PM - 2:00 P.M. EST Post-show Wrap-up
PUBLIC LINKS:
Live public audio streams will be made available via Pacifica.org. Please check back during the scheduled broadcast for the various links. Audio streams will be made available at the following formats: 24k mp3pro; 48k mp3pro; and 44k ogg.
ANCHORED BY: Larry Bensky, Pacifica National Affairs Correspondent
Elizabeth de la Vega, former federal prosecutor for more than 20 years.
During her tenure, she was a member of the Organized Crime Strike Force and Chief of the San Jose Branch of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of California.
DESCRIPTION OF EVENT:
The Senate Judiciary Committee holds its second hearing into President Bush's authorization of warrantless wiretaps within the United States of America. Breaks will include expert analysis and anchor commentary.
LIST OF GUESTS:
Confirmed guests:
American University Political Science Professor,Clarence Lusane
Invited:
Ann Beeson, Associate Legal Director of the American Civil Liberties Union
Mark Danner, Staff Writer, The New Yorker;
Professor, UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism
U.S. Representative John Conyers, (D-Michigan)
Others TBA
WITNESSES:
The Honorable James Woolsey
Vice President Global Strategic Security Division
Booz Allen Hamilton
McLean, VA
Harold Hongju Koh
Dean Yale Law School
New Haven, CT
Ken Gormley
Associate Professor of Constitutional Law
Duquesne University School of Law
Pittsburgh, PA
Doug W. Kmiec
Professor Pepperdine University School of Law
Malibu, CA
Bruce Fein, Esq.
Fein & Fein
Washington, DC
Robert F. Turner
Associate Director
Center for National Security Law
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, VA
Robert Levy, Esq.
Senior Fellow in Constitutional Studies
CATO Institute
Washington, DC
FOR PACIFICA AND AFFILIATE STATIONS
LIVE DISTRIBUTION:
Ku Satellite Right Channeloraudioport.org/live [use the right channel link]
DOWNLOAD [after program]:
A recording of the wrap-up will available in Audioport for download by 4:00 PM EST;
TYPE: Events and Speeches; FILE NAME: NSAHearing2:28_02_06
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
contact Kirsten Thomas, Exec. Producer
[Note that Kirsten Thomas' cell phone number is included if you visit the link. I'm not comfortable posting her cell number even if it is a business cell phone. Our point in posting this is to get the word out. So it's all been included except for her cell number. I'm less concerned about an e-mail address and she deserves her production credit so we'll include that.]
Trevor advises that there's a new site for Pacifica (in addition to the ones already permalinked on the left, always on the left). We'll note it here but I'm too tired to go into the template tonight and add it so I'll do that later this week. (If it's not done by Saturday, flood me with e-mails.)
In addition to the ways to listen already noted above, and in addition to broadcast radio if you live in an area that carries Pacifica, you can also check these sites:
KPFA listen live · visit online (Berkeley, Larry Bensky is anchoring and he announced on air Sunday that KPFA would carry the hearings and it starts at 6:00 a.m. Pacific time)
KPFK listen live · visit online (Los Angeles, Zach says no word at the website on whether they're carrying it or not)
KPFT listen live · visit online (Houston, Ruth noted they are carrying it and that it will start at eight am central time for those in that area; people listening online, do the math if you're not in the central time zone)
WBAI listen live · visit online (New York, New York)
WPFW listen live · visit online (DC, Barbara says no word on the hearings at the website yet)
And we'll note this as well:
Our Affiliate Stations · Does Your Local Community Station Want to Join Our Family, click here to find out more!
If there's a Pacifica station you normally listen to (online or broadcast) make that your first choice. If it ends up not carrying the hearings, you can try another Pacifica station or the main Pacifica website and listen online.
Will Democracy Now! air tomorrow? Has it ever not aired? Even from Ground Zero, on September 11th it aired. It will air tomorrow so if it's not aired on a radio station you normally listen to it on, catch it on TV or catch it at the website. It's the program's ten year anniversary so, suggestion, how about if we all make an effort to get the word out to at least ten people, between now and the end of March, about the show? Ten new people you've never told about the show.
democracy now
octavia butler
the third estate sunday review
nsa
fisa
government snooping
government spying
snoopgate
pacifica
pacifica radio
radio
wbai
kpfa
kpft
wpfw
kpfk
michael ratner
center for constitutional rights
law and disorder
lewis lapham
elizabeth holtzman
ruths public radio report
And science fiction writer Octavia Butler has died at the age of 58. She died on Friday night after a fall outside her home in Washington state. Her best-known work included "Parable of the Talents" and "Kindred." Butler was considered to be one of the first African-American women to break into the world of science fiction. Jane Jewell, of the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America, said "She is a world-class science fiction writer in her own right. She was one of the first and one of the best to discuss gender and race in science fiction." Butler joined us four months ago on Democracy Now:
OCTAVIA BUTLER: "I'm going to read a verse or two. And keep in mind these were written early in the 1990s. But I think they apply forever, actually. This first one, I have a character in the books who is, well, someone who is taking the country fascist and who manages to get elected President and, who oddly enough, comes from Texas. And here is one of the things that my character is inspired to write about, this sort of situation. She says:
"Choose your leaders with wisdom and forethought. To be led by a coward is to be controlled by all that the coward fears. To be led by a fool is to be led by the opportunists who control the fool. To be led by a thief is to offer up your most precious treasures to be stolen. To be led by a liar is to ask to be lied to. To be led by a tyrant is to sell yourself and those you love into slavery."
The above item is from today's Democracy Now! Headlines and my apologies to Ty. Octavia Butler is a favorite author of his and this should have been noted earlier today. I had intended for it be noted and in the e-mail attempts (to e-mail the post), it was; however, those never made it and I ended up dictating the entry over and forgetting the item.
I'm tired, so this is a talking entry.
Bruce wondered what online page I went to for the excerpt of Lewis Lapham's "The Case For Impeachment" that was in this entry? I didn't read it online. Chad e-mailed the heads up that a portion was available online. I dictated that from the print version of Harper's Magazine. On the essay (which is wonderful), Lily e-mails about another site calling Lapham's a first or something. I haven't seen the entry she's speaking of. Hopefully, they're not saying that. Elizabeth Holtzman's "The Impeachment of George W. Bush" advocated the impeachment of Bully Boy (and was also wonderful). Click here for the contents of that issue (available to all, subscriber or nonsubscribe) and you'll see the cover. The Nation made that the cover story of their January 30, 2006 issue. Again, I haven't read the entry (and don't have time to). But if someone was saying Lapham's article was a first for a magazine, it's not the first for the year. I'm sure there were other cover articles as well before Holtzman's.
Both are wonderful articles and approach the impeachment differently. Lewis is writing an essay in his own wonderful way and Holtzman is doing the same in her way. Robert Scheer was advocating it in 2003. (He wasn't the only one.) In terms of magazines making it a cover story, at least this year, The Nation did that awhile back. (I can't say how many issues ago because they always arrive late -- and usually in twos or threes -- I never did receive the Frances Lappe Moore issue. That's not a slam at The Nation. It's a mail issue, not a magazine one. I have The Progressive delivered to a friend's residence and, as a result, it arrives on time. The only magazine that does -- and again, not a slam at any magazine, it's a mail issue.)
I'm not trying to take anything away from Lapham. I'm not even sure Lapham was called the first. And it doesn't really matter if he was to this community. What does matter in this community is that we recognize that Lapham continues this year's tradition of cover articles calling on impeachment.
In terms of confusion, I'm not surprised Bruce's is confused. The entry that did make it to the site was rushed (hence forgetting Ty's highlight) and there's no sentence stating "This is from the magazine." My apologies for that. It's a strong issue and Stan's already e-mailed about an essay "Liberalism, Torture and The Ticking Bomb" by David Luhan. Stan wonders what the Judith N. Shklar quote is from? I'm surprised it isn't credited. I'm not sure, but I believe it's from the introduction to Ordinary Vices. I'll check on that later this week. I haven't read the entire essay yet. But the quote appears to be from Ordinary Vices.
Bruce found this announcement online at Harper's:
HARPER'S MAGAZINE
presents
Is There a Case for Impeachment?
a public forum featuring
Lewish H. Lapham
Rep. John J. Conyers (D-MI)
Michael Ratner
Elizabeth Holtzman
John Dean
Moderated by
Sam Seder
Thursday, March 2
8:00 p.m.
Town Hall
123 West 43rd Street
New York, NY
$10.00
Tickets are available at
The Town Hall box office
or through Ticketmaster
(212) 307-4100
www.ticketmaster.com
Press contact for this event: Giulia Melucci.
See, it really was Michael Ratner day. (See earlier entry.) Maybe it's Michael Ratner week?
Ruth noted this:
New Orleans 1973 to Guantánamo 2006
A discussion on torture at the hands of the United States government.
WHAT: New Yorkers Unite to Fight U.S. Torture from New Orleans to Abu Ghraib and Guantánamo
WHEN: March 3, 2006,
6:30 to 8:30 PM
WHERE: Riverside Church,
91 Claremont Ave.
Room 9T
(1 block west of Broadway)
WHO:
Gita Gutierrez, CCR attorney representing Guantànamo detainees
John Bowman and Harold Taylor, Black Panthers tortured by New Orleans Law Enforcement in 1973
Henry “Hank” Jones, CDHR
Wayne Thompson, CDHR
Dr. Ron Daniels, Institute of the Black World 21st Century
Michael Ratner, CCR President
Bill Goodman, CCR Legal Director
Staying on Michael Ratner but moving to the Center for Constitutional Rights, Jonah was at work and attempted to find a new book online at WBAI's pledge drive premiums. He couldn't find it. (Did you contribute anyway, Jonah? I'm just teasing.) He heard about it during the broadcast of Law and Disorder and went through "seven pages of premiums" looking and "used the search function too." The book is Articles of Impeachment Against George W. Bush and you can order it online. (Or you could have called WBAI, it's not even a toll call for you, Jonah.) If it wasn't on the seven pages of premiums, that's because, according to Ruth, it's brand new. This was the first day WBAI was offering it. Ruth says it's $9.99 plus shipping and that you can send it to Congress members of your choice at a discount rate. Don't want to order online? See if there's not an address you can send a check or money order too or ask your bookstore of choice to special order it for you. The book's put out by the Center for Constitutional Rights.
Remember that the Senate holds another NSA warrentless, illegal spying hearing. Want to listen? Tuesday Pacifica will air the NSA hearings, gavel to gavel, live. WBAI is still doing fundraising. I would guess that they would cover it but Rachel says they have nothing up about it currently.
NSA Surveillance Hearing Special Coverage Feb 28, 2006
SPECIAL LIVE COVERAGE:Pacifica Radio will broadcast: President Bush surveillance coverage of the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings on the National Security Agency activities.
The Senate Judiciary Committee holds its second hearing into President Bush's authorization of warrantless wiretaps within the United States of America. Breaks will include expert analysis and anchor commentary.
TENTATIVE SCHEDULE:
9:00-9:30 AM EST Pre-show
9:30 AM - 1:00 PM EST Hearings
1:00 PM - 2:00 P.M. EST Post-show Wrap-up
PUBLIC LINKS:
Live public audio streams will be made available via Pacifica.org. Please check back during the scheduled broadcast for the various links. Audio streams will be made available at the following formats: 24k mp3pro; 48k mp3pro; and 44k ogg.
ANCHORED BY: Larry Bensky, Pacifica National Affairs Correspondent
Elizabeth de la Vega, former federal prosecutor for more than 20 years.
During her tenure, she was a member of the Organized Crime Strike Force and Chief of the San Jose Branch of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of California.
DESCRIPTION OF EVENT:
The Senate Judiciary Committee holds its second hearing into President Bush's authorization of warrantless wiretaps within the United States of America. Breaks will include expert analysis and anchor commentary.
LIST OF GUESTS:
Confirmed guests:
American University Political Science Professor,Clarence Lusane
Invited:
Ann Beeson, Associate Legal Director of the American Civil Liberties Union
Mark Danner, Staff Writer, The New Yorker;
Professor, UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism
U.S. Representative John Conyers, (D-Michigan)
Others TBA
WITNESSES:
The Honorable James Woolsey
Vice President Global Strategic Security Division
Booz Allen Hamilton
McLean, VA
Harold Hongju Koh
Dean Yale Law School
New Haven, CT
Ken Gormley
Associate Professor of Constitutional Law
Duquesne University School of Law
Pittsburgh, PA
Doug W. Kmiec
Professor Pepperdine University School of Law
Malibu, CA
Bruce Fein, Esq.
Fein & Fein
Washington, DC
Robert F. Turner
Associate Director
Center for National Security Law
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, VA
Robert Levy, Esq.
Senior Fellow in Constitutional Studies
CATO Institute
Washington, DC
FOR PACIFICA AND AFFILIATE STATIONS
LIVE DISTRIBUTION:
Ku Satellite Right Channeloraudioport.org/live [use the right channel link]
DOWNLOAD [after program]:
A recording of the wrap-up will available in Audioport for download by 4:00 PM EST;
TYPE: Events and Speeches; FILE NAME: NSAHearing2:28_02_06
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
contact Kirsten Thomas, Exec. Producer
[Note that Kirsten Thomas' cell phone number is included if you visit the link. I'm not comfortable posting her cell number even if it is a business cell phone. Our point in posting this is to get the word out. So it's all been included except for her cell number. I'm less concerned about an e-mail address and she deserves her production credit so we'll include that.]
Trevor advises that there's a new site for Pacifica (in addition to the ones already permalinked on the left, always on the left). We'll note it here but I'm too tired to go into the template tonight and add it so I'll do that later this week. (If it's not done by Saturday, flood me with e-mails.)
In addition to the ways to listen already noted above, and in addition to broadcast radio if you live in an area that carries Pacifica, you can also check these sites:
KPFA listen live · visit online (Berkeley, Larry Bensky is anchoring and he announced on air Sunday that KPFA would carry the hearings and it starts at 6:00 a.m. Pacific time)
KPFK listen live · visit online (Los Angeles, Zach says no word at the website on whether they're carrying it or not)
KPFT listen live · visit online (Houston, Ruth noted they are carrying it and that it will start at eight am central time for those in that area; people listening online, do the math if you're not in the central time zone)
WBAI listen live · visit online (New York, New York)
WPFW listen live · visit online (DC, Barbara says no word on the hearings at the website yet)
And we'll note this as well:
Our Affiliate Stations · Does Your Local Community Station Want to Join Our Family, click here to find out more!
If there's a Pacifica station you normally listen to (online or broadcast) make that your first choice. If it ends up not carrying the hearings, you can try another Pacifica station or the main Pacifica website and listen online.
Will Democracy Now! air tomorrow? Has it ever not aired? Even from Ground Zero, on September 11th it aired. It will air tomorrow so if it's not aired on a radio station you normally listen to it on, catch it on TV or catch it at the website. It's the program's ten year anniversary so, suggestion, how about if we all make an effort to get the word out to at least ten people, between now and the end of March, about the show? Ten new people you've never told about the show.
democracy now
octavia butler
the third estate sunday review
nsa
fisa
government snooping
government spying
snoopgate
pacifica
pacifica radio
radio
wbai
kpfa
kpft
wpfw
kpfk
michael ratner
center for constitutional rights
law and disorder
lewis lapham
elizabeth holtzman
ruths public radio report
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)