Friday, March 20, 2009

The sixth anniversary in broadcast

Today the US military announced: "BAGHDAD -- A Multi-National Divsion- Center Soldier died March 19 from non-combat related causes. The name of the deceased is being withheld pending notification of next of kin and release by the Department of Defense. The incident is under investigation." The announcement brings to 4260 the number of US service members killed in Iraq since the start of the illegal war. Another death and on the sixth anniversary. This as the Seattle Times reports that next month there will be ceremonies for South Dakota's Army National Guard's 300 members who are deploying to Iraq ("for a year"). No, the Iraq War has not ended, no the US service members have not all come home.

It's a cute little lie. One that continues the Iraq War. One that allows a new wave of Operation Happy Talk to result in the absurd CBS poll Rebecca called out last night. It allows us to ignore the dead, the dying, the wounded, the suffering. The US started that illegal war but we have so many more pressing things to do than address what our government's actions are responsible for. Or that's how it plays out as Barack pursues the third term of George W. Bush. He was speechifying yesterday, with both teleprompters, and you knew it was the sixth anniversary of the start of the Iraq War because he worked it in -- in such a way as to let the whole world know just how 'important' it was to him, "I've also said that we are going to end the Iraq war, which is going to save us money during that period of time." Poor Barry, all tuckered out from having to say so much about Iraq. He's not ending the illegal war. He is insulting the disabled and challenged and the White House can't walk back that. It is the sort of remark one expects from Bully Boy Bush but there's no difference between George W. and Barack. Want to walk it back? How about an apology to everyone Barry insulted and their families? How about he takes his ass down to Philadelphia and gives one of those meaningless, pretty word speeches? Or does he not realize that as offensive as his little 'joke' was, it's all the more offensive when so many Americans are returning from Iraq and Afghanistan with disabilities?

What a moron. How tasteless, how tacky and how non-presidential. At some point (possibly in the near future) when Barry gives one of his turn-to-the-right, turn-to-the-left speeches, those cameras are going to pull back enough to show the American people (the bulk of whom are unaware) the teleprompters causing Barry to go rubber-neck throughout every speech. Until then, most Americans don't notice because, if it didn't beam its way onto their TV screens, it simply didn't happen.

And the Iraq War didn't happen. Or it didn't on NBC Nightly News or ABC World News Tonight. They had other things to do. Including flirt with destroying a photogenic TV journalist. Last night, the sort of shift took place that causes loud howls of laughter and, in the eighties, led to one of the most famous TV faces being drummed out of TV journalism. No one caught it because no one pays attention. Ava and I may cover it Sunday. Or we may be kind and just laugh privately.

"It's so deadly now for U.S. troops," Lara Logan reported on The CBS Evening News with Katie Couric yesterday (link has video and text), "that even rebuilding work has to be done at night. U.S. engineers work in the dark to repair a bridge that was blown up by terrorists." She was reporting from Mosul and, no, that doesn't sound like the Iraq War is ending. But that report didn't make it on ABC or NBC so those watching their evening broadcasts were fed 'comfort food' passed off as news. That was only one of the disturbing bits of reality Logan offered. Another was this, "What you can't see in Mosul are the Iraqi soldiers who captured the suspect and then handed him over to their U.S. counterparts. They asked not to be identified, for fear of being killed." The Iraqi soldiers are scared to be seen on camera. For fear of being killed.

And the spin is supposed to be "Iraq War Over, Rejoice!" It's an important report and Mosul overtook Baghdad for violence last year though few bothered to notice. (That does not mean things turned to milk & honey in Baghdad. It means Mosul grew ever more violent.)

Along with CBS Evening News, the only other broadcast news to offer Iraq coverage was PBS. The NewsHour's Ray Suarez moderated an Iraq roundtable (link has text and audio) and we'll note this section:

RAY SUAREZ: Let's go to some of our viewer questions. Armeney writes from Okemos, Mich.: "What's the probability that Shiite-Sunni strains will reemerge when the Americans downsize their forces? Will al-Qaeda in Iraq prey upon Sunni discontent to strike back at the Shiite government?" Ambassador, why don't you take that first?

FEISTAL ISTRABADI: Well, I mean, you know, this of course is the $64,000 question. I don't think any serious observer of the Iraqi security and armed forces believe that they're going to be ready in June of this year or by the end of next year to provide security in Iraq. And what happens when the Americans withdraw?
If I can comment on what was said a moment ago about Maliki taking on the militias in Basra; what he has done is taken on the Jaish al-Mahdi, the Sadrists - what we often call the Sadrist militia in Basra and in Baghdad. He has not yet taken on the militia of his principal coalition partner, in Baghdad, that is to say the militia of the Supreme Council - the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq, the Badr brigade. And it's not clear that he can because much of the security forces are in the hands of the Badr brigade militia hierarchy.
So we don't really have a taking on of militias in Iraq. What we have is a choosing of which militias are going to be in ascendancy in Iraq. And this is a real problem.
When American forces start to withdraw, if you still have several militias intact, which can get back to the business of slaughtering the other side's civilians, which is what we had in 2006 and 2007 - and that's my real fear for the future of Iraq in the immediate post-withdrawal.

That's an excerpt. The roundtable was very in depth. (We noted another section last night.)
For the record, disarming the militias? Also a benchmark. For those playing on the home editions, that would be benchmark seven (disarming) and benchmark thirteen was ensuring that the militias do not have "control of local security." And these benchmarks? They are not supposed to be 'near' them today. The 'surge' was done to create the political space for the 18 benchmarks to be achieved. All of the 18 were supposed to have been achieved before January 1st. They were not. That is why the 'surge' was a failure.

The Brookings Idiots (see previous entry) want to LIE to you and pretend things were achieved and are being achieved. The 18 benchmarks weren't open-ended. They had a due date. The 'surge' was a failure. The puppet government of Nouri al-Maliki failed (and continues to fail). That's reality and it's reality Americans need to grasp as they sit on their fat asses and say, "I'm okay with the Iraq War dragging on . . . Now that the cutey Barry Obama is in charge. Go Bam-Bam!"

What's that? You're not sitting on your fat ass? Your ass isn't even fat? Well prove it.
Saturday, those wanting to call out the illegal war can join with groups such as The National Assembly to End the Wars, the ANSWER coalition, World Can't Wait and Iraq Veterans Against the War -- all are taking part in a real action. Iraq Veterans Against the War explains:

IVAW's Afghanistan Resolution and National Mobilization March 21st
As an organization of service men and women who have served in Iraq, Afghanistan, stateside, and around the world, members of Iraq Veterans Against the War have seen the impact that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have had on the people of these occupied countries and our fellow service members and veterans, as well as the cost of the wars at home and abroad. In recognition that our struggle to withdraw troops from Iraq and demand reparations for the Iraqi people is only part of the struggle to right the wrongs being committed in our name, Iraq Veterans Against the War has voted to adopt an official resolution calling for the immediate withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan and reparations for the Afghan people. (To read the full resolution, click here.)
To that end, Iraq Veterans Against the War will be joining a national coalition which is being mobilized to march on the Pentagon, March 21st, to demand the immediate withdrawal of troops from Iraq and Afghanistan and further our mission and goals in solidarity with the national anti-war movement. This demonstration will be the first opportunity to show President Obama and the new administration that our struggle was not only against the Bush administration - and that we will not sit around and hope that troops are removed under his rule, but that we will demand they be removed immediately.
For more information on the March 21st March on the Pentagon, and additional events being organized in San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Orlando, to include transportation, meetings, and how you can get involved, please visit: www.pentagonmarch.org or www.answercoalition.org.

We'll come back to Iraq in a moment. Public broadcasting notes. NOW on PBS looks at the economy:

How the economic collapse is creating a health care calamity.
Losing your job is a blow not just to your income, but also to your health insurance. Many can't afford high COBRA premiums, much less private insurance. And the sputtering economy is making a bad situation tragic.
NOW travels to Nevada, where a huge budget deficit, spiking unemployment, and cuts in Medicaid and other public services are forcing people to gamble with their own lives. Recently, the only public hospital in Las Vegas had to shut its doors to cancer patients and pregnant women. Should the government be helping out?
NOW shares the human stories behind the distressing numbers, and investigates possible solutions and responses with insight from Dr. Howard Dean, former Vermont governor and chairman of the Democratic National Committee.
With the economic disaster blowing holes in society's health care safety net, who's left to catch our fall?

Washington Week also focuses on the economy and Gwen sits down with Jackie Calmes (New York Times), Doyle McManus (Los Angeles Times), Alexis Simendinger (National Journal) and Pierre Thomas (ABC News).

Bill Moyers Journal offers Socialist historian Mike Davis (who will hopefully speak of more than the economy), a segment billed as "American Dissidents: Against the Tide, From Thomas Paine to Ralph Nader" (and we may crucify this, Ava and I, on Sunday -- Ralph? Ralph whom Bill couldn't have on throughout 2008 when he was running for president?) and Marta Pelaez of Family Violence Prevention Services. Will Bill's commentary this week note the illegal war or will he be one more voice of silence? Tune in tonight. (Or catch it online -- transcript, audio and video are the options and Moyers' program is the only PBS one that strives to serve all segments online.)

All three begin airing on most PBS stations tonight. Some air later in the week or repeat later in the week. Check your local listings for times and air dates (and you can use the links to find out the air dates in your areas -- "Where do I watch?" is the title at Washington Week, I believe and there are similar links at the other two shows as well). Moving over to commercial broadcast TV, Sunday, on CBS' 60 Minutes:

President Obama
The president discusses the most pressing issues of his first two months in office, including the economy, the bailouts, his budget and America's involvement in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Steve Kroft will talk to Barack Obama in the Oval Office for the interview, expected to be longer than any other he has granted.
Mr. Ayers And Mr. Lopez
Discovered living on the streets by Los Angeles Times newspaper columnist Steve Lopez, mentally ill musician Nathaniel Ayers has become the subject of a book by Lopez and now a Hollywood film. Morley Safer reports. | Watch Video

Back to Iraq and what friends are calling about (and asking, "How could you have missed . . .!") MADRE released the following:

Unleashing a Campaign of Violence
- Since the US invasion of 2003, Iraqi women have endured a public campaign of harassment, beatings, abduction, rape, and assassinations.
- The main perpetrators are militia fighters who see violence against women as a way to enforce their vision of Iraq as an Islamist state.
- Anyone perceived to challenge that vision is in danger from the militias. Women professionals, artists, intellectuals, lesbians, and human rights activists have been specifically targeted.

Revoking Women's Rights
- The largest Islamist militias are the armed wings of Iraqi political parties brought to power by the US.
- In 2003, US authorities hand-picked Islamist leaders to sit on the Iraqi Governing Council. The Council was presented in the US as the gateway to Iraqi democracy, yet these US appointees openly declared their intent to restrict women's rights.
- Once empowered, Islamists quickly moved to rescind Iraq's 1959 family law which guaranteed women equal rights in crucial areas of life.
- They also produced a constitution—with strong backing from the US—that discriminates against women in numerous ways.

Arming the Killers
- In 2005, under a policy called the "Salvador Option," the Pentagon began providing money, weapons, and military training to Shiite militias known to attack women wherever they patrolled.
- Since early 2007, the US has also funded Sunni militias, including groups that murder women who do not dress or behave to their liking.

Fighting Back
- Six years of occupation have demonstrated that the Bush Administration's rhetoric about "liberating" Iraqi women was never more than an excuse for invading Iraq.
- President Obama has pledged to draw down US military presence in Iraq but plans to leave as many as 50,000 troops through 2011.
- A recent poll shows that more than 80% of Iraqis support US withdrawal from Iraq.

- Half-measures and partial reduction of US military forces are inadequate. MADRE calls on the Obama Administration to:

1. Withdraw all US troops, US-paid foreign mercenaries and contractors.

2. Immediately close all US military bases and turn them over to Iraq.

3. Renounce all efforts to control Iraq's oil resources.

4. Assume responsibility for the humanitarian crisis that the US has caused in Iraq.

5. Fund an Iraqi-led reconstruction process and uphold UN Security Council Resolution 1325, which calls for the full participation of women in all phases of reconstruction.

Partners for Peace
- Many Iraqi women and men reject both the violence of US occupation and the repression of Islamist ideologues boosted to power by the occupation.
- These Iraqis have a vision of a multi-cultural, pluralistic Iraq grounded in genuine democracy and human rights. They share the broad progressive values of many in the anti-war movement and they deserve our support.
Learn more about Iraqi women demanding peace and women's human rights and MADRE's partnership with the Organization of Women's Freedom in Iraq.

That I will note. I'm not interested in their weak-ass, fall to your knees and beg Barack to do something b.s. online letter. Get off your knees, quit being so damn weak. Translation, "You make it so easy, don't you? Waiting for some Batman to come and save you." (Michelle Pfeiffer, Batman Returns. C.I. note: Quote corrected.)

Will England finally get the public inquiry into the Iraq War so many want? Nigel Morris' "Whistle-blower urges Iraq war public inquiry" (Independent of London):

A large number of secret documents detailing government blunders over Iraq remain buried in Whitehall, a Foreign Office whistle-blower said yesterday as he called for a full public inquiry into the war.
Carne Ross, formerly Britain's top Iraq specialist at the United Nations, protested that the Butler and Hutton inquiries had not fully examined the events leading to military action in 2003. He told MPs, who are investigating leaks and whistle-blowing by civil servants, that the intelligence available to the Foreign Office made it "very clear" that Saddam Hussein did not possess weapons of mass destruction. But he protested that he was not given a proper chance to raise his worries with ministers in the build-up to war.
Mr Ross resigned in 2004 as a civil servant after giving anonymous evidence to the Butler inquiry and is now an independent diplomat.

BBC adds:

Former senior defence intelligence expert Brian Jones also made the case for an inquiry into the war, claiming nothing had changed as a result of the Hutton and Butler probes.
He told MPs: "Having seen all that has happened since the Iraq war and the evidence that has come from the various inquiries, beyond a very small group of MPs who have, as it were, seen through some of the nonsense, for someone like me it has been very disappointing."
Mr Jones, a former colleague of Dr David Kelly, became a whistleblower in 2004 when he said intelligence chiefs ignored warnings from their own experts that they could not be certain Iraq had chemical and biological weapons.
He told MPs he had formally complained about a dossier on Saddam's alleged weapons as he feared the intelligence community would be "crucified" after its publication.
He said he was "surprised" that MPs did not spot its flaws by themselves, telling the committee: "I don't think it needed someone of my expertise to look at the dossier and see the difference between the prime minister's foreword and what was in the main body of the dossier."

Heather Lockwood's "Student Protesters Arrested on Sixth Anniversary of Iraq War" (Scripps Howard Foundation Wire) reports on some DC actions yesterday:

Dancing down the sidewalks to loud funk music, DC Students for a Democratic Society, protested "the war machine" as they were followed by police officers in cars, on horseback and on motorcycles.
The group of a few hundred carried signs that said "Funk the war" and "Student power against empire."
D.C. police arrested at least two protesters, one for spraying graffiti on a wall, but did not respond to calls for further details.
"Basically the message is war is a waste of our youth," said Lehana Penaramda, a sophomore at Walt Whitman High School in Bethesda, Md.

Kristy Kuhn's "Veterans say Iraq war is occupation, not liberation" (Deseret News):

The United States' presence in Iraq is not a liberation -- it is nothing short of an occupation.
That was the message from Iraq war veterans who spoke to a small group of 12 people who gathered at the Salt Lake Main Library on Thursday night for a public forum on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
"It's not even covert; it's overt -- it's an occupation," said Andy Figorski, who served two deployments in Iraq between 2004 and 2007.
The veterans said that the occupation was never about helping the Iraqi people but was, instead, engineered to line the pocketbooks of a group of "profit-mongers" while the American soldiers pay the ultimate price.
"People are getting extraordinarily rich off the blood of the soldiers," said Jeff Key.

And staying with IVAW, Chris Vaughn's "Iraq veteran becomes activist against the war" (Fort Worth Star-Telegram) reports on Dustin Alan Parks:

Dustin Alan Parks is accustomed to the angry stares.
He listens to the snide comments, the outrage, the insults. Traitor. Terrorist. Pinko.
But Parks, in many ways, welcomes the hostility, virtually inviting it in a place like Texas. All he has to do is wear his favorite T-shirt -- "Support G.I. Resistance."
"I’m a tad confrontational," he concedes.
Parks, 23, a combat veteran and card-carrying proselytizer for Iraq Veterans Against the War, uses the impromptu discussions to engage people in something more than a reflexive insult or stereotype, to try to get them to understand why he, as a soldier who served in Iraq, wants nothing more than the end to a war he no longer believes in.
Not that it always works.
"It backfires all the time," he said. "People think I’m some punk-ass kid, anti-war, anti-military, all about peace and love. I’m not against the military, and I love America."
On Saturday, Parks takes his newfound activism to a new and much more public stage.
He organized what he calls the Rock Bottom Peace March at 10 a.m. in General Worth Square in downtown Fort Worth, just one day after the sixth anniversary of the U.S. launching of an invasion of Iraq.
In Fort Worth, home to tens of thousands of veterans, a naval air station and a handful of major defense contractors, one never knows what an anti-war rally will draw. Parks hopes for a few hundred people.

I don't know that it will help but we will note that event in today's snapshot and, fingers crossed for luck, tomorrow in the morning (I may forget). We have focused on Saturday's action for months now and stuck with that because it makes more sense -- when so few are paying attention -- to get the word out on one event. Dustin's event may be part of the local actions tomorrow. I'm not sure on that. But it is in the Dallas - Fort Worth area and we do have a large number of community members in that and surrounding regions. We'll promote it and check your inbox for today's gina & kirsta round-robin which breaks down state-by-state what actions are going on. (If there's another D - FW action tomorrow, I am not saying, "Do Dustin's instead!" Participate in any action that feels right to you but we will include the above action in today's snapshot.)

The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.





the cbs evening news with katie couric
the newshour
ray suarez
60 minutes
pbs
 washington week
now on pbs




The sixth anniversary in print

OUR TROOPS AND IRAQIS ARE STILL DYING
An Open Letter to the Peace/Anti-War Movement from
Iraq Veterans Against the War, Military Families Speak Out, and Veterans For Peace
After six years of war and the historic election of a new President, we as veterans, military and Gold Star families felt an urgent need to reach out to the larger peace/anti-war movements to make our position on Iraq clear during this time of political and economic uncertainty. Iraq Veterans Against the War, Military Families Speak Out and Veterans For Peace continue to stand together in our demand to Bring the Troops Home Now! We ask all those who have stood with us in the past to stay faithful to the cause.
President Obama has announced a plan to gradually reduce troop levels in Iraq. Many in the peace/anti-war movements are breathing a sigh of relief, and suggesting that it is time for us to scale back our efforts to bring an end to the occupation of Iraq. But for our troops on the ground, their families and the Iraqi people, the nightmare continues. They need all of us to stay in the struggle. IVAW, MFSO and VFP have been long united in our call for an immediate and complete end to the occupation of Iraq and will not shift our stance under any circumstances.
President Obama's plan will result in more casualties and suffering for U.S. troops, their families and Iraqis. To the American public facing hard times here at home, two and a half more years of occupation may not sound like that long -- but for our troops and their families it means two and a half more years of fear, pain, and separation in a war and occupation based on lies. Hundreds of the troops deployed in the next two and a half years will not come home alive. Many more will return forever scarred by deep wounds to their bodies, minds, and spirits. Well over a million Iraqis have died as a result of this war -- many more will be killed as the occupation continues.
We cannot afford the cost of empire. Today we are in the midst of the worst economic crisis most of us have seen in our lifetimes. Yet our government continues to allow the occupation to drain $10 billion a month from our nation's coffers. Meanwhile, veterans and military families struggle to put food on the table and get decent housing and adequate medical care. Women and men who risked their lives for this country are often forced to fight tooth and nail to get health care from an underfunded and overburdened Veterans Administration. Hundreds of thousands of veterans are homeless.
The occupation of Iraq is the source of the violence not the solution. Living under occupation the people of Iraq are held back from taking control of their own lives to determine their destiny. The continued U.S. military presence there is a cause of the violence they face, not its solution. U.S. continued interference contradicts the principles of democracy and self-determination our country was founded on.
IVAW, MFSO and VFP will continue to keep pressure on Congress and the President to bring all our troops home from Iraq NOW, ensure that veterans receive the care they need and deserve, and that the U.S. provides resources to rebuild a country we destroyed. But we cannot do that alone. We need your help to reach out to the vast majority of the American people who are completely isolated from the realities of this war. Please don't abandon this struggle or shift your position before the occupation is over and our veterans and the Iraqi people are on the path to healing.
Iraq Veterans Against the War (IVAW) was founded by Iraq war veterans in July 2004 at the annual convention of Veterans for Peace (VFP) in Boston to give a voice to the large number of active duty service people and veterans who are against this war, but are under various pressures to remain silent. From its inception, IVAW has called for: Immediate withdrawal of all occupying forces in Iraq; reparations for the human and structural damages Iraq has suffered, and stopping the corporate pillaging of Iraq so that their people can control their own lives and future; and dull benefits, adequate healthcare (including mental health), and other supports for returning servicemen and women. IVAW's membership includes recent veterans and active duty servicemen and women from all branches of military service, National Guard members, and reservists who have served in the United States military since September 11, 2001.
Military Families Speak Out is an organization of people opposed to the war in Iraq who have relatives or loved ones who are currently in the military or who have served in the military since the buildup to the Iraq war in the fall of 2002. Formed by two families in November of 2002, MFSO now has over 4,000 member families. MFSO's national chapter, Gold Star Families Speak Out includes families whose loved ones have died as a result of the war in Iraq.
Founded in 1985, Veterans for Peace is a national organization of men and women veterans of all eras and duty stations spanning the Spanish Civil War (1936-39), World War II, the Korean, Vietnam, Gulf and current Iraq wars as well as other conflicts cold or hot. It has chapters in nearly every state in the union and is headquartered in St. Louis, MO. Our collective experience tells us wars are easy to start and hard to stop and that those hurt are often the innocent. Thus, other means of problem solving are necessary. Veterans For Peace is an official Non- Governmental Organization (NGO) represented at the U.N.



The above joint statement is from Iraq Veterans Against the War, Military Families Speak Out and Veterans for Peace. You can find it here at IVAW. We're opening with that because it's an important statement and it's far more than print journalism can muster.

The New York Times can't offer an article filed from Iraq -- despite all the millions spent to keep reporters for the paper in the Baghdad compound. Despite it being the sixth anniversary of the start of the illegal war. Despite the fact that the 'savior' of the paper is only now learning of new economic problems with the not-quite-bookeper-of-record.

Online, you can find Jennifer Mascia and Jason Grant's "A Day of Protests, Against Iraq War and A.I.G." which does not reflect at all the reports I've heard of the protest and which further demonstrates how unimportant online is to the New York Times. The whole news industry is striving to move online. The paper's not concerned with even basic facts that appear online. Not only do they bungle the protest, they also refer to "Sonsara Taylor" -- that would be Sunsara Taylor. The only section that checks out with accounts that have been relayed to me is this section:

Matthis Chiroux, a 25-year-old Army veteran from Alabama who said he has served in Germany, Japan and Afghanistan, but faced disciplinary proceedings because he refused to serve in Iraq, expressed impatience with the new president.
"Obama's policies just confirmed to me that the president may have changed, but the war is the same," Mr. Chiroux said. "Just because we have a black president now, doesn't mean that we don't have a racist war."

Some version of the above may make the NYC edition. The national edition skips it and offers in the print "City Beat" ("City Beat" is the NYT blog the above appears at online) a 'pressing' story on taverns. Iraq does pop up on A25 -- mainly to indicate that there's no fact checking for the print version either. Jason Campbell, Mikey O'Hanlon, Jeremy Shapiro and Amy Unikewicz serve up "The States of Iraq and Afghanistan" because yesterday was the sixth anniversary of the start of the illegal war in Iraq and in Afghanistan. What's that? It wasn't the anniversary of the start of the Afghanistan War? Oh. Well can't expect Brookings' Mental Midgets to know too much, now can you? The column is a chart -- meaning not a lot of text had to be offered but it's Brookings so you know they screwed that up as well:

As President Obama looks to reduce the number of troops in Iraq -- and the Baghdad government has achieved 7 of the 11 "Iraq index" benchmarks we have laid out, which include steps like establishing provincial election laws and enacting pension and amnesty laws -- the situation in Afghani . . .

Stop it. That's all we need. They're liars and they're damn liars. The "Iraq index" is the benchmarks. Success is measured by them being carried out. There has been little improvement and that is why the 'surge' is judged a failure. Even on the provincial elections, the Brookings Idiots want you to be so stupid you assumed that Iraq's 18 provinces held provincial elections. That did not happen. January 31st, 14 of Iraq's 18 provinces held elections. And, no, there was no exception to the benchmark. Later this spring, the Kurdish region should hold provincial elections -- should. It may change. The KRG is in tremendous political upheaval right now and for Iraq's security or 'security' that couldn't happen at a worse time. It's amazing that the think-tankers of Brookings don't know a word about that. (Or more likely, don't care to share.) And if the KRG holds their provincial elections, Kirkuk is still left out and, note, the benchmarks made no exception for Kirkuk. It didn't say, "Everywhere but Kirkuk." (For those scoring with the home version, benchmark five covers provincial elections.)

We could explain how the 'pension laws' is wrong as well but I don't intend to waste my entire morning on Brookings. We will note "wrong." Not difference of opinion, wrong. This is not, "Brookings likes what's been done but C.I. doesn't!" This is, "The benchmark says X will be done and X wasn't done."

Anthony Shadid gets credit for covering Iraq, loses it for failing to make clear that there are 18 provinces in Iraq and 18 provinces did not hold elections January 31st. Panning for gold (and holding our nose as his presses his into Nouri al-Maliki's crotch), we can extract this from "New Alliances In Iraq Cross Sectarian Lines" (Washington Post):

Forgoing the slogans of his Islamist past for a platform of law and order, his party won a majority of seats on the council in Basra, Iraq's second-largest city, and emerged as the single biggest bloc in Baghdad and four other provinces in the south, which has a Shiite Muslim majority. In most provinces, though, his party must make coalitions if it hopes to help determine who will fill the governorship and other key provincial positions.
Saleh al-Mutlak, a leading secular Sunni Arab politician known for his nationalism and strident opposition to the U.S. occupation, said his supporters will ally with Maliki in four provinces: Diyala, Salahuddin, Baghdad and Babil. Mutlak heads the Iraqi National Dialogue Front, but his supporters ran under different labels in provincial contests. Mutlak said Ayad Allawi, a former prime minister who led a secular list in the campaign, will also join the alliances.
The convergence of their interests is a stark contrast to the alliances that followed elections in 2005, which Sunni Arabs largely boycotted. Their refusal to vote gave religious Shiites and Kurds disproportionate power in provinces such as Baghdad, Diyala and Nineveh, all with substantial Sunni populations. In predominantly Shiite southern Iraq and Sunni western Iraq, power coalesced around ostensibly religious parties, whose members built their appeal on clandestine organizations in exile, underground networks under Hussein, support from Iran and other neighbors and, occasionally, the end of a militiaman's gun.

If you need something more in depth, refer to Hayder Al-Khoei's "Strange Bedfellows" (Eye Raki) from last month:

It is precisely this weird dynamic nature of Iraqi politics, I think, that makes Iraq such an interesting subject for foreign scholars. For some Iraqis its just downright funny. The Iraqi Army, on direct orders from its Commander-in-Chief, spent three months last year fighting, and more importantly defeating, the "outlaws" (a fancy name Maliki decided to give the Sadrist Mehdi Army) in Basra, Baghdad and Amara but now the Sadrists are willing to form coalitions in the south just for the sake of seeing Hakim on the losing side. Allawi who was given harsh treatment, to put gently, by Hakim's followers has suddenly decided it would be a good thing to work with Hakim.
Perhaps these rounds of negotiations show that rivalry between the Sadrists and Hakims has previously been underestimated. It is true that the Mehdi Army has clashed with the Badr Brigade on previous occasions, most spectacularly in Kerbala when the Sadrists tried to take over the shrines, but these clashes could be seen as petty when compared to the battle, or rather war, that raged between Maliki and Sadr's Mehdi Army.
When the Mehdi Army burnt down the offices of Badr and Hakim across Iraq the Badr gunmen inside the buildings were given strict orders to evacuate and offer no resistance. The rivalry between Sadr and Hakim must now be so bitter that Sadr prefers to join Maliki, the man who destroyed the Mehdi Army, and ignore Hakim, the man who has shown restraint and caution towards the Mehdi Army.
Although the Sadrists were beaten by Hakim in some of the southern provinces they will be able to effectively marginalise SIIC once they complete the deal with Maliki. It will be back to the drawing board for Hakim and rumours are already spreading about plans to undercut the local provinces with social welfare programmes. Also the $2.4 billion allocated to the provincial authorities will need to be cleared through the Finance Ministry, which is controlled by SIIC.
Maliki and Sadr will need to be careful to make sure they do not step on SIIC's toes because no one knows what will happen if they are pushed into a corner. There is fresh talk of assassinations and newly discovered "Nejadiyat" (named after the Iranian President) IED's in Najaf and the last thing anyone, not least Maliki himself, needs is bloodshed. Although that is highly unlikely to be the work of the high ranking officials in SIIC the fear is from rogue elements in the party and disgruntled players who may not necessarily take their orders from Baghdad.

Iraq is supposed to hold Parliamentary elections in December. They have yet to make an initial deadline for voting so December's elections may be postponed. Barack Obama promised one brigade a month withdrawn from Iraq when he was trying to pretend he gave a damn about ending the illegal war. He got the nomination and dropped that. He also began lying that he said he always insisted that he would listen to commanders on the ground. He continues that lie to this day.

As Ava and I noted March 1st of Barack's reinvention and continued damned lie, that's not what he said. What he said was he would determine the withdrawal and the rate of it. He would allow the commanders to offer input on how to execute it. He said withdrawal (and the rate) was the mission and the commander-in-chief sets the mission. (He was largely spitting back Hillary's words. This was in their final debate and, as usual, Hillary had answered first so Barack stole her words.) Read Hillary's response before, read Charlie's question, read Barack's response. Then marvel over how the Christ-child nevr gets called out.

[C.I. note added: Barack's long delay in starting the drawdown is due to the elections. That's the connection between the two above.]

Iraq War milestones and Gregg Zoroya (USA Today) reports on the unemployment rate for veterans:

The economic downturn is hitting Iraq and Afghanistan veterans harder than other workers -- one in nine are now out of work -- and may be encouraging some troops to remain in the service, according to Labor Department records and military officials.
The 11.2% jobless rate for veterans who served in Iraq and Afghanistan and who are 18 and older rose 4 percentage points in the past year. That's significantly higher than the corresponding 8.8% rate for non-veterans in the same age group, says Labor Department economist Jim Walker.
Army records show the service has hit 152% of its re-enlistment goal this year. "Obviously the economy plays a big role in people's decisions," says Lt. Col. Christopher Garver, an Army spokesman.

At The Christian Science Monitor, Howard LaFranchi offers "Six years in Iraq: three American stories:"

When Ms. Naar-Obed returned from Iraq in 2004, she brought with her news that would shake America and the world – reports from Iraqis of abuse in the US detention facility in Abu Ghraib.
"My hope was that whatever pressure I could bring to bear, either [in Iraq] or by speaking out about it when I was back home, would help put an end to the abuses we were hearing about," says Naar-Obed, who has spent several months of every year since 2002 in Iraq.
Once again in Iraq, Naar-Obed is impressed not by any progress she sees, but by the challenges Iraq still faces. Iraq’s sectarian tensions eased when ethnic cleansing led to migration and segregation. But the underlying tensions among Sunnis, Shiites, and Kurds remain.
"There may be a current marked reduction in violent acts [because of the new segregation of sectarian populations], but there has been little in the way of political or personal reconciliation," she says by phone and e-mail.
Currently in the Kurdish north, she says she senses "great fear and concern about what will happen when the walls that physically separate people come down, and when the forces that keep those walls erected leave."

We noted the Grannies Peace Brigade's press release last night and will note it again here:

PEACE GRANNIES ARRESTED
IN TIMES SQUARE WEDNESDAY, OCT. 18
Relax, everyone! The New York City police are solidly on the job these days. With rapists, murderers, bank robbers and dope peddlers, not to mention corporate thieves, rampant throughout the City, they made a significant dent in the crime statistics yesterday, March 18, when they arrested seven grandmothers aged 67 to 90 in Times Square.
Grannies being herded into a paddy wagon after arrest March 18, 2009 (photo by Eva-Lee Baird)
The grannies, all members of the Granny Peace Brigade, were sent to jail while protesting at the Times Square recruiting station. Their arrest occurred during what is believed to be the first antiwar protest of the Obama Administration, in an attempt to urge the President to reconsider his decision to retain 50,000 troops in Iraq after the official withdrawal scheduled to be completed in the next 18 months and his order for 17,000 more troops sent to Afghanistan. The women feel strongly that these measures will only result in increased death and destruction for Americans, Iraqis and Afghanis and further solidify anti-American feeling throughout the world. Said 94-year-old Brigadier Marie Runyon, "Peace can only be achieved through diplomacy and humanitarian aid." The Granny Peace Brigade women are mostly strong supporters of Barack Obama but were responding to his request that his constituency pressure him to do the right thing when they feel he is on the wrong path.
The Brigade is not new to demonstrating at the Times Square recruiting station -- eighteen of the grannies were arrested and jailed on Oct. 17, 2005, when they attempted to enlist in the military to replace America's grandchildren in harm's way in Iraq. After a six-day trial in criminal court, they were acquitted.
The seven grannies were arrested at approximately 1:45 p.m. and taken to the Midtown South police precinct. They were not all released until early the next morning, a total of approximately 12 hours. Some of them became shaky and weak after many hours of not eating, but were given no food for another hour and a half.
Prior to the arrest, about 50 grannies and their supporters gathered on Military Island at which a press conference was held including speeches by mayoral candidate Rev. Billy, legendary Broadway actress and activist Vinie Burrows (one of the original 18 granny jailbirds), and a young member of Iraq Veterans Against the War, Matthis Chiroux. A sister group, the Raging Grannies, performed some of their original anti-war songs.
During the press conference, grandmothers wrapped yellow police crime scene tape around the ramp near the recruiting center, after which a group, some in wheelchairs and hanging on to walkers, assembled on the ramp leading to the center.
crime scene in Times Square (photo by Masahiro Hosoda)
The team of Norman Siegel and Earl Ward, who successfully defended the grannies in 2005, will represent them in their current case, for which the grandmothers are profoundly grateful. Siegel, currently a candidate for New York City Public Advocate, is a favorite of the ladies for his continuous support of them.

The Kurdistan Regional Government notes:

President Barzani meets EU's foreign policy chief Javier Solana in Brussels

Brussels, Belgium (KRG.org) - As part of an extensive European tour, Kurdistan Region President Masoud Barzani visited Brussels on Wednesday. During his one-day visit, Mr Barzani met Mr Javier Solana, the European Union's High Representative for Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP).

The President and Mr Solana exchanged views on the latest developments in Iraq and on issues of particular interest to the Kurdistan Region. President Barzani expressed his appreciation for the European Union’s commitment to a federal and democratic Iraq and urged the EU to encourage trade and investment in the Kurdistan Region as a gateway to all of the country.

Earlier in the day President Barzani welcomed a delegation of the Iraqi federal parliament and met Iraq's ambassador to Belgium.

The President’s visit to Brussels and his European tour are part of the Kurdistan Region’s efforts to encourage international support for Iraq’s political process and to attract foreign investment to the Kurdistan Region. Earlier this month he visited Italy, the Vatican, Germany and the UK.

Dr Fuad Hussein, Chief of Staff of the Kurdistan Region Presidency, and Mr Burhan Jaf, Head of the KRG Mission to the EU, were part of the President’s delegation in Brussels.





Community sites that updated last night is an issue in the e-mails:

That's how it reads at Isaiah and Stan's blogs. A number of you are asking why Marcia didn't write? First, she's more than welcome to take a night off. Some of you note that she did write last night. Her post is "Dumb F**k Danny Sphincter and more" and it went up at her usual time (or around the usual time). Isaiah and Stan are not 'blocking' her post. That's a Blogger/Blogspot issue and Ruth and Marcia both noted the problems with Blogger/Blogspot last night. Recapping, Marcia doesn't have to blog anytime she doesn't want to or doesn't have the time, Marcia did blog last night, Isaiah and Stan are not 'censoring' her by refusing to list her post.


The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.






















oh boy it never ends

Thursday, March 19, 2009

I Hate The War

What I saw in December of last year was an ambivalence similar to what I've seen in a lot of previous trips. On the one hand, security is much better. And Iraqis, much more than I've heard before, were ready for U.S. troops to go. On the other hand, when you push hard, you still see a lot of uncertainty because the political stability, which the surge aimed to create space for, that political stability still isn't really there.
There is more political activity than there has been before. Prime Minister Maliki, his party did well in provincial elections because he was seen as having cracked down in Baghdad and Basra and created more stability.
But services aren't being delivered and people still worry about jobs and about their future. And there are still some bombs going off. So you have a combination of more eagerness for U.S. troops to leave and uncertainty and worry, especially in certain communities like the Sunni, about what will happen when those troops really start to go.


That's Trudy Rubin (Philadephia Inquirer) speaking on the roundtable Ray Suarez moderated for The NewsHour (PBS) did on Iraq. Click here for transcript and audio. I'm looking at the e-mails and if you're praising TV coverage, you are praising local coverage more often than not. The commercial broadcast networks have really disappointed. I haven't seen any of that myself but I'll watch it shortly or early tomorrow morning. That has been the pattern, though.

Among the many things today/night was a small thing tonight where a woman sang the Rolling Stones classic "As Tears Go By" which I love but have never connected it to or seen it as a song that would work for an event like that. It worked very well. I think most people were choked up by it (I was crying, my eyes are watering now just thinking back on it).

"But all I hear is the sound of rain falling on the ground, I sit and watch as tears go by."

Credit goes to the singer and the remarks she made before she started singing. Explaining her own personal loss in this illegal war.

Demonstrations took place today and will continue through the weekend. The Grannies Peace Brigade got an early start on standing up this week and here's what happened Wednesday:


PEACE GRANNIES ARRESTED
IN TIMES SQUARE WEDNESDAY, OCT. 18
Relax, everyone! The New York City police are solidly on the job these days. With rapists, murderers, bank robbers and dope peddlers, not to mention corporate thieves, rampant throughout the City, they made a significant dent in the crime statistics yesterday, March 18, when they arrested seven grandmothers aged 67 to 90 in Times Square.
Grannies being herded into a paddy wagon after arrest March 18, 2009 (photo by Eva-Lee Baird)
The grannies, all members of the Granny Peace Brigade, were sent to jail while protesting at the Times Square recruiting station. Their arrest occurred during what is believed to be the first antiwar protest of the Obama Administration, in an attempt to urge the President to reconsider his decision to retain 50,000 troops in Iraq after the official withdrawal scheduled to be completed in the next 18 months and his order for 17,000 more troops sent to Afghanistan. The women feel strongly that these measures will only result in increased death and destruction for Americans, Iraqis and Afghanis and further solidify anti-American feeling throughout the world. Said 94-year-old Brigadier Marie Runyon, "Peace can only be achieved through diplomacy and humanitarian aid." The Granny Peace Brigade women are mostly strong supporters of Barack Obama but were responding to his request that his constituency pressure him to do the right thing when they feel he is on the wrong path.
The Brigade is not new to demonstrating at the Times Square recruiting station -- eighteen of the grannies were arrested and jailed on Oct. 17, 2005, when they attempted to enlist in the military to replace America's grandchildren in harm's way in Iraq. After a six-day trial in criminal court, they were acquitted.
The seven grannies were arrested at approximately 1:45 p.m. and taken to the Midtown South police precinct. They were not all released until early the next morning, a total of approximately 12 hours. Some of them became shaky and weak after many hours of not eating, but were given no food for another hour and a half.
Prior to the arrest, about 50 grannies and their supporters gathered on Military Island at which a press conference was held including speeches by mayoral candidate Rev. Billy, legendary Broadway actress and activist Vinie Burrows (one of the original 18 granny jailbirds), and a young member of Iraq Veterans Against the War, Matthis Chiroux. A sister group, the Raging Grannies, performed some of their original anti-war songs.
During the press conference, grandmothers wrapped yellow police crime scene tape around the ramp near the recruiting center, after which a group, some in wheelchairs and hanging on to walkers, assembled on the ramp leading to the center.
crime scene in Times Square (photo by Masahiro Hosoda)
The team of Norman Siegel and Earl Ward, who successfully defended the grannies in 2005, will represent them in their current case, for which the grandmothers are profoundly grateful. Siegel, currently a candidate for New York City Public Advocate, is a favorite of the ladies for his continuous support of them.


Good to know that the police made time to go after the Grannies Peace Brigade. Until GPB (Raging Grannies) sent their press release, I had wrongly assumed that actual crime still took place in NYC. Someone who has the time might want to go through Thursday's crime reports tomorrow and find out how many robberies, murders, rapes, etc took place Thursday. All day Thursday because crimes before the Grannies were harassed should have been occupying the police's time and crimes after the harassment might have been prevented had the police been doing their actual jobs.

I will bet anyone that Thursday was not a crime-free day in NYC.

So it was the sixth anniversary of the illegal war and if you took part in something, you noted it. If you didn't, judging by the e-mails, it was more difficult. PBS has a lot of praise for the roundtable (even though most of you take issue with the guests -- I'm not surprised by that, it wasn't my dream lineup either) so I'll toss out that some stations are in fundraising. If you appreciated The NewsHour's work and you have something to give, consider doing so. If you don't have it, don't sweat it. If you do decide to give, consider making it clear that you're giving for the Iraq coverage today and that you didn't feel served by broadcast networks.

It's over, I'm done writing songs about love
There's a war going on
So I'm holding my gun with a strap and a glove
And I'm writing a song about war
And it goes
Na na na na na na na
I hate the war
Na na na na na na na
I hate the war
Na na na na na na na
I hate the war
Oh oh oh oh
-- "I Hate The War" (written by Greg Goldberg, on The Ballet's Mattachine!)

Last Thursday, ICCC's number of US troops killed in Iraq since the start of the illegal war was 4257. Tonight? 4259.

I'd planned to cover Congress and the illegal war but I just can't get the woman singing "As Tears Go By" out of my head and, some of you will grasp this, you can only cry so many times in one night before your make up's not the only thing f**ked up. I really can't be bloodshot all day tomorrow. So I'm just going to stop here, have one more cry and then get focused on figuring out tomorrow's schedule.

The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.




the newshour
ray suarez