VOTE: New poll now at http://sharylattkisson.com
How do you view Julian Assange?
Also, see results of our last unscientific poll: "Is The Swamp being drained?"
Look for black rectangle on left sidebar or scroll down on mobile site.
So many of you have asked: When are you going to team up with @SharylAttkisson? That day has arrived. Watch us together on @FullMeasureNews Sunday at 10a ET, when I report on the existence of a previously undisclosed…
3-The PR documents specifically discussed ways to discredit, target and smear WikiLeaks and Assange. Three were discredited by sex claims alleged in the media but never prosecuted, including a key WikiLeaks associate Jacob Appelbaum.
1-Whatever the truth about Julian Assange’s innocence or guilt on a number of accusations, we know one thing for sure: he, WikiLeaks and their associates were targeted by a powerful smear campaign which is documented in the 2010 internal documents of a government contractor.
2-Government contractors circulated this dossier in 2010, a wide-ranging strategy to combat “The WikiLeaks Threat,” to “sabotage or discredit” WikiLeaks supporters using “social media exploitation” and “disinformation.”
"fell through"? The talk by @SharylAttkisson to our crowd after her book a few years ago was one of our best events. She did my morning and evening show -- 5 hours of being interviewed -- then she wowed the crowd with anecdotes and analysis. It was one of my favorite events ever. …
I would amend your sentiment a tad. Because political and corporate interests control Wikipedia pages (including my biography) there are times when anybody can *note* write anything because these page-watchers "volunteer editors" delete the info if they don't want it there.
Replying to @SharylAttkisson
Ha! I tell all my students that if they want to use Wikipedia for a source, they better find a second source to back it up. Therefore, they might as will not even use it. Anyone can write anything on Wikipedia.
Thank you, @VP, for coming to the border.
This is not a partisan issue. It's not a Republican or Democrat issue. It's an issue of public safety, border security and national security, and not just for Arizona but the entire country.
There are at least two possibilities.
Assange has lied and The Russians supplied him with internal Democrat emails/info for WikiLeaks. = (#RussiaCollusion with nonAmerican)
Or Assange has told the truth and it was somebody else. Not the Russians.
How long have our politicians been arguing about reducing health care costs, only managing to come up with proposals to spread high costs to different groups? Meantime, they quietly fixed it in Montana in a way nobody in DC seems to even be considering.