Friday, April 12, 2019

Some Tweets from Sharyl Attkisson


  • You say "tomato"-- I say "tomahto."
  • Gallup: The country that views our US leadership most favorably-- is a Muslim country. Find out which one Sunday
  • VOTE: New poll now at How do you view Julian Assange? Also, see results of our last unscientific poll: "Is The Swamp being drained?" Look for black rectangle on left sidebar or scroll down on mobile site.
  • Go to home page (pick a local station or DC). But scroll down to EXPLORE MORE line, scroll right to NEWS block, click into it and we are third item there. Thanks
  • In my opinion, some media won't give much attention to stories like my cover story this week because they make so much $$ off pharmaceutical ads. Check it out Sunday
  • Sunday: Do prescription drug ads on TV disclose the risks properly? New information on what the FDA is doing since we began investigating.
  • Delighted to have on again Sunday! How to watch online, on demand or on TV here:
  • Prescription TV Drug ads-- and Iran's alleged deception. Watch Sunday's We won't waste your time rehashing news you've already heard all week.
  • Sad and mysterious case
  • 3-The PR documents specifically discussed ways to discredit, target and smear WikiLeaks and Assange. Three were discredited by sex claims alleged in the media but never prosecuted, including a key WikiLeaks associate Jacob Appelbaum.
  • 4-Read more here about the mysterious stories behind the story of Assange, WikiLeaks, rape accusations and smears.
  • In case they aren't showing up on your feed, if you're interested in Assange-related background, look for my last 4 Tweets. Thanks
  • 1-Whatever the truth about Julian Assange’s innocence or guilt on a number of accusations, we know one thing for sure: he, WikiLeaks and their associates were targeted by a powerful smear campaign which is documented in the 2010 internal documents of a government contractor.
  • 2-Government contractors circulated this dossier in 2010, a wide-ranging strategy to combat “The WikiLeaks Threat,” to “sabotage or discredit” WikiLeaks supporters using “social media exploitation” and “disinformation.”
     
  • Hello!
  • Sorry it fell through.
  • (Unless you watch each week) ;)
  • In just a moment-- a few things you probably didn't know about the case involving Assange...
  • I would amend your sentiment a tad. Because political and corporate interests control Wikipedia pages (including my biography) there are times when anybody can *note* write anything because these page-watchers "volunteer editors" delete the info if they don't want it there.
  • Looks like small crowd at the moment.
  • Thank you, , for coming to the border. This is not a partisan issue. It's not a Republican or Democrat issue. It's an issue of public safety, border security and national security, and not just for Arizona but the entire country.
  • For example, There are at least two possibilities. Either: Assange has lied and The Russians supplied him with internal Democrat emails/info for WikiLeaks. = ( with nonAmerican) Or Assange has told the truth and it was somebody else. Not the Russians.
  • Today's
  • Is it possible that Assange has info that some who are heralding his arrest wouldn't like told? What do you think?
  • And...We partnered with Pioneer Institute to see how easy it is to comparison shop for medical procedures and uncovered astounding price disparities.
  • How long have our politicians been arguing about reducing health care costs, only managing to come up with proposals to spread high costs to different groups? Meantime, they quietly fixed it in Montana in a way nobody in DC seems to even be considering.
  • GOVT. SPYING on journalists From an overview of the forensic evidence to how the propagandist's false "back space key" narrative came about, your questions about Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI are answered here: